Next Article in Journal
Fuzzy–Monte Carlo-Based Assessment for Enhanced Urban Transport Planning in Amman, Jordan
Next Article in Special Issue
The Role of Spare Parts Supply Chains in the Success of New Computer Technology Products
Previous Article in Journal
A Holistic Human-Based Approach to Last-Mile Delivery: Stakeholder-Based Evaluation of Logistics Strategies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Circular Strategic Options for Ethanol Supply Chain Resilience Under Uncertainties Using a Composition of Probabilities Group Decision Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Weathering the Storm: Dynamic Capabilities and Supply Chain Agility in Supply Chain Resilience

The Belk College of Business, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Logistics 2025, 9(4), 136; https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics9040136
Submission received: 31 July 2025 / Revised: 16 September 2025 / Accepted: 19 September 2025 / Published: 25 September 2025

Abstract

Background: Despite growing interest in supply chain resilience (SCRes), theoretical overlap between dynamic capabilities (DC) and supply chain agility (SCA) has complicated empirical analysis of their distinct roles. Additionally, the contextual role of information asymmetry in shaping resilience remains underexplored. This study addresses both issues by modeling DC hierarchically and examining IA as a moderator. Methods: Data were collected through a cross-sectional survey of 157 U.S.-based supply chain professionals. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to examine the relationships among DC, SCA, IA, and SCRes. Results: SCA was a strong, direct predictor of SCRes. In contrast, DC showed no direct effect in the full model; however, in a hierarchical component model (HCM), DC, a higher-order construct, emerged as significant predictor of SCRes. IA exerted a dual negative influence: it directly weakened SCRes and negatively moderated the relationship between DC and SCRes. Conclusions: This study makes two novel contributions. First, it resolves ambiguity between DC and SCA by empirically modeling DC as a higher-order construct that encompasses but remains distinct from SCA. Second, it introduces IA as a multidimensional barrier to resilience, demonstrating its direct and interactive effects. These findings provide new insight into capability design and contextual adaptation for SCRes in uncertain, information-constrained environments.
Keywords: dynamic capabilities; supply chain agility; supply chain resilience; information asymmetry dynamic capabilities; supply chain agility; supply chain resilience; information asymmetry

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Legg, M.; Silver, R.A.; Park, S. Weathering the Storm: Dynamic Capabilities and Supply Chain Agility in Supply Chain Resilience. Logistics 2025, 9, 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics9040136

AMA Style

Legg M, Silver RA, Park S. Weathering the Storm: Dynamic Capabilities and Supply Chain Agility in Supply Chain Resilience. Logistics. 2025; 9(4):136. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics9040136

Chicago/Turabian Style

Legg, Marie, Reginald A. Silver, and Sungjune Park. 2025. "Weathering the Storm: Dynamic Capabilities and Supply Chain Agility in Supply Chain Resilience" Logistics 9, no. 4: 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics9040136

APA Style

Legg, M., Silver, R. A., & Park, S. (2025). Weathering the Storm: Dynamic Capabilities and Supply Chain Agility in Supply Chain Resilience. Logistics, 9(4), 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics9040136

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop