Melissopalynological Characterization of North Algerian Honeys
1
Laboratory Research on Biological Systems and Geomatics, Faculty of Nature and Life, University of Mascara, 29000, Mascara, Algeria
2
Laboratory of Experimental Biotoxicology, Biodepollution and Phytoremediation, University of Es-Senia, 31000, Oran, Algeria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2013, 2(1), 83-89; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods2010083
Submission received: 5 January 2013
/
Revised: 11 February 2013
/
Accepted: 16 February 2013
/
Published: 7 March 2013
Abstract
:A pollen analysis of Algerian honey was conducted on a total of 10 honey samples. The samples were prepared using the methodology described by Louveaux et al., that was then further adapted by Ohe et al. The samples were subsequently observed using light microscopy. A total of 36 pollen taxa were discovered and could be identified in the analyzed honey samples. Seventy percent of the studied samples belonged to the group ofmonofloral honeys represented by Eucalyptus globulus, Thymus vulgaris, Citrus sp. and Lavandula angustifolia. Multifloral honeys comprised 30% of the honey samples, with pollen grains of Lavandula stoechas (28.49%) standing out as the most prevalent. Based on cluster analysis, two different groups of honey were observed according to different pollen types found in the samples. The identified pollen spectrum of honey confirmed their botanical origin.
1. Introduction
Honey, apart from a variety of stable elements, contains floral pollen grains that are collected by honeybees along with the nectar. The presence of the floral pollen grains affords the possibility of identifying the botanical and geographical origin of honey [1].
Diversity of vegetation in Algeria makes possible diversification of honey production. The apiculture in Algeria is widely practiced in the mountainous region (Kabylie, Aurès mountains), in the coastal plains (Mitidja), in the interior plains (Mascara) and in the valleys of large wadis (Soummam), the deserted areas of the highlands and the southern region of the country being the only exceptions to honey production [2]. The botanical origin of honey is one of the most important parameters of honey quality [3,4,5]. The quality of honey depends on the melliferous plants that bees use in their nourishment [6]. The nectar obtained from different melliferous plants has different characteristics and applications, both in medicine and in the food industry [4].
Taxa of pollen are used to indicate the floral nectar sources utilized by bees to produce honey [7,8,9,10] and are also an essential tool to indicate the geographic origin of the honey [11,12].
The aim of this work was to provide information on the geographical and botanical origin of the honey samples collected and to identify the nectar sources foraged by the bees.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sample Collection
Ten samples of honeys produced in two regions of northern Algeria were collected from beekeepers in 2006. The samples were stored in a refrigerator in airtight plastic containers until analysis; these samples were of different floral types (unifloral and multifloral honey).
2.2. Pollen Analysis
The melissopalynological characteristics, both qualitative and quantitative, were studied following Louveaux et al. [13] and Ohe et al. [14]. Ten grams of honey were dissolved in 20 mL of distilled water. This mixture was divided into two centrifuge tubes of 15 mL, and centrifuged for about 5 min; at 3000 tr/min. Distilled water was again added to the sediment, repeating the previous operation. Approximately 5 mL of glycerine-water 1:1 were added to the sediment, and it was left to rest for 30 min. After this time, the sample was centrifuged. The sediment was removed with the aid of a stylet, embedded in glycerine jelly and deposited on a microscopic slide, sealing with paraffin wax. The identification of each pollen grain in the treated honey sample was performed with the aid of a pollen atlas [15], and other published floras [16,17,18,19], which gave brief descriptions of the observed pollen in the samples.
The frequency classes of pollen grains are given as predominant pollen (>45%), secondary pollen (16%–45%), important minor pollen (3%–15%) and minor pollen (1%–3%) [13].
2.3. Statistical Analysis
To classify the samples, a cluster analysis was applied. This analysis can classify the data in groups of similarity (clusters) [20].
Cluster analysis is comprised of a series of multivariate methods that are used to find true groups of data or stations. In clustering, the objects are grouped such that similar objects fall into the same class.
Cluster analysis was displayed in order to find similarities between the honey samples. In order to do so, Euclidean’s hierarchical cluster method for pattern recognition was used.
3. Results and Discussion
The result of 10 studied samples in this work shows that only four pollen types presented frequency higher than 45%; the main botanical species for honey production in Algeria are found to be Eucalyptus globulus, Thymus vulgaris, Citrus sp. and Lavandula angustifolia, (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Somatorium of the pollen frequency of the identified plant species in ten samples of Algerian honeys.
Figure 1.
Somatorium of the pollen frequency of the identified plant species in ten samples of Algerian honeys.
Honey sample 1, from the locality Ménaouer, contained pollen grains from Thymus vulgaris at a percentage of nearly 58%; thus, the pollen of this species is dominant, suggesting that this plant is the chief source of pollen and nectar in bee foraging.
Honey sample 5, from the locality Freguig, has Lavandula angustifolia as the predominant pollen. Of the ten samples, three (S8, S9 and S10) presented very high percentages of Eucalyptus globulus; in two samples (S2 and S7), Citrus was predominant (Table 1).
| Pollen Taxa/Family | Samples | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meneour | Guetna | Makda | Hacine | Freguig | Ain fares | Bouguirat | Sidi ali | Sirat | Hadjadj | |
| (S1) | (S2) | (S3) | (S4) | (S5) | (S6) | (S7) | (S8) | (S9) | (S10) | |
| Acaia sp. (Mimosaceae) | 15.6 | |||||||||
| Artemisia sp. (Composeae) | 14 | |||||||||
| Asparagus sp. (Liliaceae) | 9.37 | 8.99 | ||||||||
| Calendula arvensis (Composeae) | 7.02 | 7.5 | ||||||||
| Calycotum spinosa (Papilionaceae) | 10.1 | |||||||||
| Ceratonia siliqua (Fabaceae) | 15.62 | |||||||||
| Cistus sp. (Cistaceae) | 1.5 | |||||||||
| Citrus sp. (Rutaceae) | 46 | 45 | 62.5 | |||||||
| Convolvolus arvensis (Convolvulaceae) | 2.5 | |||||||||
| Cupressus sp. (Cupressaceae) | 3.08 | |||||||||
| Eucalyptus camaludensis (Myrtaceae) | 12 | 6.98 | 12 | 5 | ||||||
| Eucalyptus globulus (Myrtaceae) | 86.2 | 52.4 | 80.22 | |||||||
| Eucalyptus resinifera (Myrtaceae) | 18 | |||||||||
| Eucalyptus sp. (Myrtaceae) | 15 | 20 | 22.96 | 9.88 | 0.57 | |||||
| Fraxinus sp. (Oleaceae) | 14.84 | |||||||||
| Fucus indica (Cactaceae) | 1.98 | |||||||||
| Lavandula angustifolia (Lamiaceae) | 60.33 | |||||||||
| Lavandula stoechas (Lamiaceae) | 21 | 35.98 | ||||||||
| Malva sp. (Malvaceae) | 0.43 | 1.19 | ||||||||
| Muscari comosum (Liliaceae) | 0.78 | |||||||||
| Olea europea (Oleaceae) | 0.18 | |||||||||
| Oxalis sp. (Oxalidaceae) | 3.5 | |||||||||
| Papaver rhoeas (Papaveraceae) | 2.26 | 1.76 | 3.5 | |||||||
| Pastinaca sativa (Apiaceae) | 11.98 | 15 | 15 | 5.97 | 7.78 | |||||
| Pinus sp. (Pinaceae) | 6.5 | 1.95 | 0.11 | |||||||
| Pistacia lentiscus (Anacardiaceae) | 5.98 | 9.26 | 0.14 | |||||||
| Prunus spinosa (Rosaceae) | 4.44 | |||||||||
| Punica granatum (Pinucaceae) | 5 | |||||||||
| Quercus ilex (Fagaceae) | 2.05 | |||||||||
| Quercus sp. (Fagaceae) | 3.02 | |||||||||
| Quercus suber (Fagaceae) | 1.02 | |||||||||
| Rosmarinus officinalis (Lamiaceae) | 18.95 | 2.51 | ||||||||
| Senecio jacobea (Asteraceae) | 0.59 | |||||||||
| Sinapis arvensis (Brassicaceae) | 9 | 9.52 | 10.44 | |||||||
| Tamarix sp. (Tamaricaceae) | 7.03 | |||||||||
| Thymus vulgaris (Lamiaceae) | 57.91 | |||||||||
Quantitative analysis has shown low pollen concentrations in the studied honey samples, 5 samples belonged to the I class of representativity (under-represented honeys, with less than 20,000 pollen grains in 10 g honey), 5 to the II class (normal honeys, with 20,000 to 100,000 PG/10 g). Our results are quite in agreement with Ouchemoukh et al. [21]; these authors found in their study of 11 Algerian samples lower PG/10 g values, ranging from 20 × 103 until 40 × 103. Their samples were collected in various regions of the province Bejaia.
The results of a study by Makhloufi et al. [16] on the pollen richness of 66 Algerian honeys found the values for the PG/10 g for the classes I, II, III and V to be, respectively, 33%, 40.9%, 22.7% and 3%.
The results of qualitative pollen analysis indicate the diversity of resources utilized by honeybees in the region of investigation. The botanical families Myrtaceae, Rutaceae and Lamiaceae were most frequently found in the samples.
Out of 66 Algerian honeys analyzed by Makhloufi et al. [22], the main botanical species for Algerian honeys were found to be Eucalyptus sp., Umbelliferae (above all Pimpinella), Hedysarum, Cruciferae, Compositae (mainly Carduus), Trifolium sp. and, to a lesser extent, Echium, Rubus and Citrus.
With the dendogram that corresponds to the geographical origin of the honey samples, it was possible to distinguish two different groups (Figure 2). The first group is composed of honey produced in Ain fares; the second cluster clearly creates two separate subgroups. The first subgroup includes the stations Guetna, Hacine and Bouguirat, with Citrus sp. being the most common plant species pollen in the samples of these stations. The second includes the stations Sidi ali, Hadjadj and Sirat, a representative amount of Eucalyptus globulus occurred in these samples. The botanical composition of regional honey depends on the climatic conditions during the apicultural period.
Figure 2.
Dendrogram of cluster analysis.
4. Conclusion
From the 10 studied samples, a total of 36 taxa of nectariferous honey plants were identified. The specific richness of the investigated honey varied from 1 to 9 taxa. The melissopalynological analyses showed that the most dominating pollens in honey samples were Myrtaceae, Rutaceae and Lamiaceae. Cluster analysis distinguishes two different groups of Algerian honey.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Stawiarz, E.; Wroblewska, A. Melissopalynological analysis of multifloral honeys from the sandomierska upland aera of Poland. J. Apic. Sci. 2010, 54, 1. [Google Scholar]
- Hussein, M.H. Beekeeping in Africa. I—North, East, North-East and West African countries. Apiacta 2001, 36, 1–92. [Google Scholar]
- Tucak, Z.; Puškadija, Z.; Bešlo, D.; Bukvić, Ž.; Milanković, Z. Chemical Organicleptic Honey Determination in Honey—Herbs in the Region Slavonia and Baranja; University of Ljubljana: Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1998; pp. 299–302. [Google Scholar]
- Tucak, Z.; Tucak, A.; Puškadija, Z.; Tucak, M. Nutritious healing composition of some kinds of honey in Eastern Croatia. Agriculture 2000, 6, 129–132. [Google Scholar]
- Tucak, Z.; Periškić, M.; Bešlo, D.; Tucak, I. Influence of the beehive type on the quality of honey. Coll. Antropol. 2004, 28, 463–467. [Google Scholar]
- Ozturk, F.; Erkan, C. Bee plants of Van Lake Basin (Turkey). Int. J. Bot. 2010, 6, 101–106. [Google Scholar]
- Lieux, M.H. Dominant pollen types recovered from commercial Louisiana honeys. Econ. Bot. 1975, 29, 78–96. [Google Scholar]
- Lieux, M.H. Secondary pollen types characteristic of Louisiana honeys. Econ. Bot. 1977, 31, 111–119. [Google Scholar]
- Louveaux, J.; Maurizio, A.; Vorwohl, G. Methods of melissopalynology. Bee World 1970, 51, 125–131. [Google Scholar]
- Sawyer, R. Honey Identification; Cardiff Academic Press: Cardiff, UK, 1988; p. 350. [Google Scholar]
- Lieux, M.H. A melissopalynological study of 54 Louisiana (U.S.A.) honeys. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 1972, 13, 95–124. [Google Scholar]
- Jones, G.D.; Goodman, D.K.; Clarke, R.T. Alcohol Dilution of Honey. In Proceedings of 9th International Palynological Congress, Houston, TX, USA, 23–28 June 1996; pp. 453–458.
- Louveaux, J.; Maurizio, A.; Vorwohl, G. Methods of melissopalynology. Bee World 1978, 59, 139–153. [Google Scholar]
- Ohe Von Der, W.; Persano Oddo, L.; Piana, M.; Morlot, M.; Martin, P. Harmonized methods of melissopalynology. Apidologie 2004, 35, 18–25. [Google Scholar]
- Bernard, J.; Reille, M. Nouvelles analyses polliniques dans l’Atlas de Marrakech, Maroc. Pollen Spores 1987, 2, 225–240, in French. [Google Scholar]
- Makhloufi, C.; Kerkvliet, D.; Ricciardelli d’albore, G.; Choukri, A.; Samar, R. Characterization of Algerian honeys by palynological and physico-chemical methods. Apidologie 2010, 41, 509–521. [Google Scholar]
- Maurizio, A.; Louveaux, J. Pollens de Plantes Mellifères d’Europe; Union des Groupements Apicoles Français: Paris, France, 1965. [Google Scholar]
- Ricciardelli d’Albore, G. Textbook of Melissopalynology; Apimondia: Bucharest, Romania, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Ricciardelli d’Albore, G. Mediterranean Melissopalynology; Institute of Agricultural Entomology, University of Perugia: Perugia, Italy, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Simeonov, V.; Wolska, L.; Kuczynska, A.; Gurwin, J.; Tsakovski, S.; Protasowicki, M.; Namiesnik, J. Sediment-quality assessment by intelligent data analysis. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2007, 26, 323–331. [Google Scholar]
- Ouchemoukh, S.; Louaileche, H.; Schweizer, P. Physicochemical characteristics and pollen spectrum of some Algerian honeys. Food Control. 2007, 18, 52–58. [Google Scholar]
- Makhloufi, C.; Schweizer, P.; Azouzi, C.; Persano Oddo, L.; Choukri, A.; Hocine, L.; Ricciardelli d’Albore, G. Some properties of Algerian honey. Apiacta 2007, 42, 73–80. [Google Scholar]
© 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Nair, S.; Meddah, B.; Aoues, A. Melissopalynological Characterization of North Algerian Honeys. Foods 2013, 2, 83-89. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods2010083
AMA Style
Nair S, Meddah B, Aoues A. Melissopalynological Characterization of North Algerian Honeys. Foods. 2013; 2(1):83-89. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods2010083
Chicago/Turabian StyleNair, Samira, Boumedienne Meddah, and Abdelkader Aoues. 2013. "Melissopalynological Characterization of North Algerian Honeys" Foods 2, no. 1: 83-89. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods2010083
APA StyleNair, S., Meddah, B., & Aoues, A. (2013). Melissopalynological Characterization of North Algerian Honeys. Foods, 2(1), 83-89. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods2010083
