Next Article in Journal
Effect of Combined Pretreatments on Yield and Quality of Cold-Pressed Pomegranate Seed Oil
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Water Activity on Physical Stability and Bioactive Compound Retention in Yellow Pitaya (Selenicereus megalanthus) Pulp Powder
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chemometric Differentiation of Organic Honeys from Southeastern Türkiye Based on Free Amino Acid and Phenolic Profiles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Honey and Bee Products: Characterization, Bioactivities, and Authenticity

by
Sandra M. Osés
* and
Maria Teresa Sancho
Department of Biotechnology and Food Science, Universidad de Burgos (University of Burgos), Pza. Misael Bañuelos s/n, 09001 Burgos, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2026, 15(4), 647; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15040647
Submission received: 27 January 2026 / Accepted: 9 February 2026 / Published: 11 February 2026
Bee products, including honey, bee pollen, propolis, royal jelly, bee bread, and bee brood, are appreciated by consumers due to their sensory characteristics and health-promoting functions [1,2]. The fundamental step in establishing the therapeutic potential of honey and other apicultural products is to define their physicochemical, biological, and nutritional properties [3,4,5,6]. But also, to verify the authenticity of the products by different analytical techniques, as honey and other bee products can be adulterated [7,8,9]. In this context, the Special Issue, entitled “Honey and Bee Products: Characterization, Bioactivities and Authenticity”, contains nine research papers and one review. These articles highlight the importance of honey characterization to avoid adulteration. Fraudulent practices compromise the quality and authenticity of honey on a global scale, making studies on its potential biological properties and other bee products important for beekeepers and consumers.
Honey authenticity was assessed by different analytical techniques, each capable of discerning its botanical and geographical origins. Gürbüz and Kivrak demonstrated that an integrated approach—combining free amino acids and phenolic profiles (UPLC-ESI-MS/MS) with supervised chemometric methods—provided a successful and reliable model for determining the geographical origin of organic honeys from southeastern Türkiye. Barbarić et al. used GC-MS to reveal a unique volatile profile, distinguishing linden honeydew honey from other honeydew varieties. Their samples exhibited strong antimicrobial activities and good wound-healing capabilities, indicating that this honey possessed promising bioactive properties and dermatological potential. Dua et al. generated a database of isotopic signatures of Indian honey, where Δδ13CP-H values (>+1‰ equivalent to C4 sugar < −7%) were proposed as indicators of C3 adulteration. Honrado et al. used cytochrome C oxidase I (COI) metabarcoding to assess the honey bee source of European honeys. This technique showed high sensitivity. Honey’s entomological origins were accurately identified. It was C-lineage honey bees that mainly produced commercial honeys from northwestern Europe. Therefore, the entomological origin could be an indicator of adulteration for honeys with a protected designation of origin (PDO). Tasić et al. characterized Serbian honeys, revealing differences in their composition and quality. Irregular contents of sucrose, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, acidity, and diastase activity could indicate adulteration.
Another important point of this Special Issue is the study of the biological properties of different bee products. Mokhtar et al. underlined the apicultural and ecological importance of Vachellia tortilis and Ziziphus spina-christi honeys in arid regions and reviewed the therapeutic value of these honeys from the United Arab Emirates. González-Montiel assessed the content of bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of emulsions with propolis extracts during simulated in vitro digestion, showing a good emulsion stability that helped protect the bioactive compounds. Osés et al. evaluated the antimicrobial activity of honey from different botanical origins, concluding that all the honeys exhibited a high anti-Staphylococcus aureus activity and that catalase activity could be considered a possible marker of the antimicrobial activity of honeys against S. aureus. Tongchai et al. studied the food safety and antioxidant activity of worker honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) broods from Northern Thailand. The results showed that it is a safe, sustainable, and nutritious food with considerable antioxidants. Cavallero et al. studied Italian polyfloral bee pollen, showing good antioxidant, antiradical, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory activities that could alleviate the inflammatory responses of various chronic pulmonary conditions.
To conclude, this Special Issue highlights three pivotal themes: the importance of bee product characterization to avoid fraud, the necessity of using different analytical techniques to detect honey adulterations, and the relevance of studying the potential biological properties of bee products. All papers can help promote local beekeeping in each area and add economic value to bee products. This Special Issue features a collection of high-quality original research and reviews, providing readers with significant insights into the field.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M.O.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M.O.; writing—review and editing, M.T.S. and S.M.O.; supervision, M.T.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Gürbüz, S.; Kıvrak, Ş. Chemometric Differentiation of Organic Honeys from Southeastern Türkiye Based on Free Amino Acid and Phenolic Profiles. Foods 2025, 14, 3105. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14173105.
  • Barbarić, A.; Saftić Martinović, L.; Marijanović, Z.; Juretić, L.; Jurič, A.; Petrović, D.; Šoljić, V.; Gobin, I. Integrated Chemical and Biological Evaluation of Linden Honeydew Honey from Bosnia and Herzegovina: Composition and Cellular Effects. Foods 2025, 14, 1668. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14101668.
  • Dua, A.; Bahman, S.; Kelly, S.; Dogra, S.; Sharma, K. Authentication of Indian Honey Based on Carbon Stable Isotope Ratio Analysis—Verification of Indian Regulatory Criteria. Foods 2025, 14, 1289. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14081289.
  • Honrado, M.; Quaresma, A.; Henriques, D.; Pinto, M.A.; Amaral, J.S. COI Metabarcoding as a Novel Approach for Assessing the Honey Bee Source of European Honey. Foods 2025, 14, 419. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14030419.
  • Tasić, A.; Pezo, L.; Lončar, B.; Pešić, M.B.; Tešić, Ž.; Kalaba, M. Assessing the Impact of Botanical Origins, Harvest Years, and Geographical Variability on the Physicochemical Quality of Serbian Honey. Foods 2024, 13, 1530. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13101530.
  • Mokhtar, F.A.; Elhawary, S.S.; Fakhry, A.M.; Almoalla, A.A.; Alyammahi, K.M.; Belaid, Y.; Abdelazim, K.; Zabady, A.H.; Yassin, H.A.; Elnahas, H.M.; et al. Ecological, Apicultural, and Therapeutic Value of Vachellia tortilis and Ziziphus spina-christi Honeys in the United Arab Emirates: A Model for Sustainable Use in Arid Ecosystems. Foods 2025, 14, 2859. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14162859.
  • González Montiel, L.; León-López, A.; García-Ceja, A.; Franco-Fernández, M.J.; Pérez-Soto, E.; Cenobio-Galindo, A.J.; Campos-Montiel, R.G.; Aguirre-Álvarez, G. Stability, Content of Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Emulsions with Propolis Extracts during Simulated In Vitro Digestion. Foods 2024, 13, 779. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13050779.
  • Osés, S.M.; Rodríguez, C.; Valencia, O.; Fernández-Muiño, M.A.; Sancho, M.T. Relationships among Hydrogen Peroxide Concentration, Catalase, Glucose Oxidase, and Antimicrobial Activities of Honeys. Foods 2024, 13, 1344. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13091344.
  • Tongchai, P.; Yadoung, S.; Sutan, K.; Kawichai, S.; Danmek, K.; Maitip, J.; Ghosh, S.; Jung, C.; Chuttong, B.; Hongsibsong, S. Antioxidant Capacity, Phytochemicals, Minerals, and Chemical Pollutants in Worker Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Broods from Northern Thailand: A Safe and Sustainable Food Source. Foods 2024, 13, 1998. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13131998.
  • Cavallero, A.; Vidotto, F.; Sbrana, C.; Peres Fabbri, L.; Petroni, G.; Gabriele, M. Antioxidant-Rich Polyfloral Bee Pollen Exerts Antimicrobial Activity and Anti-Inflammatory Effect in A549 Lung Epithelial Cells by Modulating the NF-κB Pathway. Foods 2025, 14, 802. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14050802.

References

  1. Giampieri, F.; Quiles, J.L.; Cianciosi, D.; Forbes-Hernández, T.Y.; Orantes-Bermejo, F.J.; Alvarez-Suarez, J.M.; Battino, M. Bee products: An emblematic example of underutilized sources of bioactive compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 6833–6848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kieliszek, M.; Piwowarek, K.; Kot, A.M.; Wojtczuk, M.; Roszko, M..; Bryta, M.; Petkoska, A.T. Recent advances and opportunities related to the use of bee products in food processing. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 11, 4372–4397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bogdanov, S.; Jurendic, T.; Sieber, R.; Gallmann, P. Honey for Nutrition and Health: A Review. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2008, 27, 677–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Escuredo, O.; Miguez, M.; Fernandez-Gonzalez, M.; Seijo, M.C. Nutritional value and antioxidant activity of honeys produced in a European Atlantic area. Food Chem. 2013, 138, 851–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Denisow, B.; Denisow-Pietrzyk, M. Biological and therapeutic properties of bee pollen: A review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 4303–4309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ramadan, M.F.; Al-Ghamdi, A. Bioactive compounds and health-promoting properties of royal jelly: A review. J. Funct. Foods 2012, 4, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mădaş, M.M.; Mărghitaş, L.A.; Dezmirean, D.S.; Bobiş, O.; Abbas, O.; Danthine, S.; Francis, F.; Haubruge, E.; Nguyen, B.K. Labeling regulations and quality control of honey origin: A Review. Food Rev. Int. 2020, 36, 215–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Z.; Ren, P.; Wu, Y.; He, Q. Recent advances in analytical techniques for the detection of adulteration and authenticity of bee products—A review. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2021, 38, 533–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pastor, K.; Dolasevic, S.; Nastic, N. Authentication of propolis: Integrating chemical profiling, data analysis and international standardization. A review. Foods 2025, 14, 4259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Osés, S.M.; Sancho, M.T. Honey and Bee Products: Characterization, Bioactivities, and Authenticity. Foods 2026, 15, 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15040647

AMA Style

Osés SM, Sancho MT. Honey and Bee Products: Characterization, Bioactivities, and Authenticity. Foods. 2026; 15(4):647. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15040647

Chicago/Turabian Style

Osés, Sandra M., and Maria Teresa Sancho. 2026. "Honey and Bee Products: Characterization, Bioactivities, and Authenticity" Foods 15, no. 4: 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15040647

APA Style

Osés, S. M., & Sancho, M. T. (2026). Honey and Bee Products: Characterization, Bioactivities, and Authenticity. Foods, 15(4), 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15040647

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop