This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Proteolytic Tenderization of Pork Loin with Papain and Bromelain and Its Physicochemical and Sensory Effects
by
Mihai Cătălin Ciobotaru
Mihai Cătălin Ciobotaru ,
Bianca-Georgiana Anchidin
Bianca-Georgiana Anchidin
,
Diana-Remina Manoliu
Diana-Remina Manoliu ,
Marius Mihai Ciobanu
Marius Mihai Ciobanu *
and
Paul-Corneliu Boișteanu
Paul-Corneliu Boișteanu
“Ion Ionescu de la Brad” Iasi University of Life Sciences, 3 Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, 700490 Iasi, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2026, 15(12), 2160; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15122160 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 8 May 2026
/
Revised: 9 June 2026
/
Accepted: 11 June 2026
/
Published: 15 June 2026
Abstract
Improving tenderness in whole-muscle pork products remains a technological challenge, particularly when natural processing strategies are preferred over conventional additives, as texture is regarded as one of the most important quality attributes influencing consumer perception and acceptance of meat products. This study investigated whether two plant proteases, papain and bromelain, incorporated into a red algae-based brine containing Palmaria palmata could enhance the quality of injected pork loin without compromising microbiological safety or sensory acceptance. Seven batches were produced: a control sample and six enzyme-treated samples containing papain or bromelain at 0.015%, 0.030%, and 0.045%. Overall, the enzymatic treatments had a limited effect on proximate composition. However, a modest decrease in fat content was observed, from 3.09% in the control sample to 2.70–2.82% in the samples treated with the highest concentrations of papain and bromelain (0.045%). In contrast, instrumental color and texture were strongly affected. Enzyme-treated samples became lighter, less red, and less saturated, with redness decreasing from 13.07 in the control to 5.19–6.66 in the highest-dose treatments and total color differences reaching 8.66. The most relevant effect was observed in texture, where papain and bromelain markedly reduced shear force, shear work, hardness, gumminess, and chewiness; shear force decreased from 26.22 N/cm2 in the control to 10.78 N/cm2 and 9.38 N/cm2 in the batches treated with the highest enzyme concentrations. During refrigerated storage, total viable counts increased gradually but remained low, with a maximum of 4.56 × 102 CFU/g, while Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., and Listeria monocytogenes were not detected. Sensory analysis further showed that enzymatic treatment improved perceived tenderness and juiciness without reducing overall acceptability. These findings indicate that papain and bromelain can be used as natural tenderizing tools in injected pork loin, offering a promising route toward cleaner-label meat products with improved texture and preserved microbiological quality.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Ciobotaru, M.C.; Anchidin, B.-G.; Manoliu, D.-R.; Ciobanu, M.M.; Boișteanu, P.-C.
Proteolytic Tenderization of Pork Loin with Papain and Bromelain and Its Physicochemical and Sensory Effects. Foods 2026, 15, 2160.
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15122160
AMA Style
Ciobotaru MC, Anchidin B-G, Manoliu D-R, Ciobanu MM, Boișteanu P-C.
Proteolytic Tenderization of Pork Loin with Papain and Bromelain and Its Physicochemical and Sensory Effects. Foods. 2026; 15(12):2160.
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15122160
Chicago/Turabian Style
Ciobotaru, Mihai Cătălin, Bianca-Georgiana Anchidin, Diana-Remina Manoliu, Marius Mihai Ciobanu, and Paul-Corneliu Boișteanu.
2026. "Proteolytic Tenderization of Pork Loin with Papain and Bromelain and Its Physicochemical and Sensory Effects" Foods 15, no. 12: 2160.
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15122160
APA Style
Ciobotaru, M. C., Anchidin, B.-G., Manoliu, D.-R., Ciobanu, M. M., & Boișteanu, P.-C.
(2026). Proteolytic Tenderization of Pork Loin with Papain and Bromelain and Its Physicochemical and Sensory Effects. Foods, 15(12), 2160.
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15122160
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.