Next Article in Journal
Influence of Different Selenium Biofortification Methods on Structural Features and Antioxidant Bioactivities of Pleurotus geesteranus Polysaccharides
Previous Article in Journal
Mineral-Fortified and Sodium-Reduced Pimento-Paste-Stuffed Spanish-Style Manzanilla Olives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Impact Assessment of Spatial Mismatch Between Grain Production and Consumption on Non-Point Source Pollution and Carbon Emissions from Grain Production in China

1
College of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
2
Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany
3
Department of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt University of Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2026, 15(10), 1659; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15101659
Submission received: 8 April 2026 / Revised: 5 May 2026 / Accepted: 6 May 2026 / Published: 9 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Food Security and Sustainability)

Abstract

The spatial mismatch between grain production and consumption (SMGPC) significantly affects the non-point source pollution and carbon emissions from grain production (NPCE). Based on provincial panel data in China from 2000 to 2023, this study explored the direct impact and transmission mechanism of the SMGPC on the NPCE using fixed-effect and mediating-effect models. The results showed that China’s SMGPC intensified significantly during 2000–2023. The average SMGPC degree increased with fluctuations, with positive mismatch strengthening in the northern region and negative mismatch deepening in the southern region. All four NPCE indicators—non-point source pollution per unit sown area (NPA), carbon emissions per unit sown area (CEA), non-point source pollution per unit yield (NPY), and carbon emissions per unit yield (CEY)—peaked in 2016 and declined thereafter. The NPA and CEA showed net increases, whereas the NPY and CEY exhibited net decreases, presenting a similar spatial pattern of “high in the eastern region, low in the central and western regions”. The SMGPC degree drove NPCE indicators with obvious heterogeneity: it increased all NPCE indicators in the negative mismatch region but increased the NPA and CEA while reducing the NPY and CEY in the positive mismatch region. Moreover, cultivated land management scale and chemical fertilizer application intensity significantly mediated the relationship between the SMGPC and the NPCE. The findings offer guidance for optimizing grain production layout and promoting a green agricultural transformation.
Keywords: spatial mismatch; grain production and consumption; non-point source pollution; carbon emissions; China spatial mismatch; grain production and consumption; non-point source pollution; carbon emissions; China

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, H.; Sieber, S. Impact Assessment of Spatial Mismatch Between Grain Production and Consumption on Non-Point Source Pollution and Carbon Emissions from Grain Production in China. Foods 2026, 15, 1659. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15101659

AMA Style

Yang H, Sieber S. Impact Assessment of Spatial Mismatch Between Grain Production and Consumption on Non-Point Source Pollution and Carbon Emissions from Grain Production in China. Foods. 2026; 15(10):1659. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15101659

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Hui, and Stefan Sieber. 2026. "Impact Assessment of Spatial Mismatch Between Grain Production and Consumption on Non-Point Source Pollution and Carbon Emissions from Grain Production in China" Foods 15, no. 10: 1659. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15101659

APA Style

Yang, H., & Sieber, S. (2026). Impact Assessment of Spatial Mismatch Between Grain Production and Consumption on Non-Point Source Pollution and Carbon Emissions from Grain Production in China. Foods, 15(10), 1659. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15101659

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop