Next Article in Journal
Quantitative Analysis Model for the Powder Content of Zanthoxylum bungeanum Based on IncepSpect-CBAM
Previous Article in Journal
Predicting Sweetness Intensity and Uncovering Quantitative Interactions of Mixed Sweeteners: A Machine Learning Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bioactive, Functional, and Technological Properties of Gluten-Free Pasta Enriched with Mango (Mangifera indica L.) Leaf Powder
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 15
Issue 1
10.3390/foods15010168
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Valorization and Environmental Impacts of Pecan Waste: A Critical Review

by
Jean Louis Yannick Omotonoko
1,2,
Michael Polozola
3,
Andrej Svyantek
4 and
Zhuoyu Wang
2,*
1
Water Management & Hydrological Science Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
2
Food Sciences & Technology Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
3
Dean Lee Research Station, Louisiana State University, Alexandria, LA 71302, USA
4
Department of Horticultural Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2026, 15(1), 168; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15010168
Submission received: 31 October 2025 / Revised: 15 December 2025 / Accepted: 1 January 2026 / Published: 4 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental and Comprehensive Utilization of Agricultural and Food Production Wastes and Residues)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Pecan (Carya illinoinensis) cultivation generates a substantial number of byproducts, particularly nutshells, which are often discarded despite being rich in bioactive and structural compounds. These agro-industrial residues, comprising nearly 50% of the total nut mass, contain high levels of phenolics, flavonoids, dietary fiber, and lignocellulosic matter, making them suitable for circular economy applications. This review critically evaluates the potential of pecan shell waste for value-added applications in environmental remediation, food and pharmaceutical formulations, and green materials production. It explores innovative green extraction techniques, such as ultrasound-assisted, microwave-assisted, and subcritical water extraction, to recover valuable compounds like ellagic acid and tannins with high efficiency and minimal environmental impact. Moreover, the review highlights the conversion of pecan shells into activated carbon for wastewater treatment and soil remediation. Pecan byproducts have been used as sustainable feedstocks for catalyst support, contributing to energy conversion and biomass catalysis. The bioactive compounds also offer therapeutic properties, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial effects, supporting their inclusion in nutraceutical and cosmetic applications. Through a comprehensive synthesis of recent studies, this work highlights the role of pecan shell valorization in reducing waste, improving public health, and increasing economic resilience within agro-industrial systems. By aligning with sustainable development and circular economies, the utilization of pecan byproducts provides a low-cost, eco-innovative pathway to mitigate environmental pollution and promote sustainable development.

1. Introduction

Current global population growth is leading to an increasing demand for food production [1]. The global agroindustry produces billions of metric tons of waste annually, much of which remains underutilized, posing significant challenges to environmental sustainability [2]. In 2021–2022, global pecan nut (Carya illinoinensis) production was approximately 129,510 metric tons [3]. The United States and Mexico were the leading producers, accounting for approximately 45% and 39% of the total output. South Africa is the third-largest pecan producer and has likely continued to increase pecan production. Argentina, although a more minor player, produced around 2000 tons from 10,000 hectares in 2021 and is projected to expand its cultivation area by 700 to 900 hectares annually [4]. Notably, South Africa and Argentina are located in the Southern Hemisphere, where the pecan harvest typically occurs from April to June, which differs from the Northern Hemisphere’s season, which spans from October to December. This geographic spread may help support more continuous global availability of pecan shell byproducts for industrial and research applications. While pecan nuts are increasingly cultivated worldwide for their nutritional benefits, the disposal of large volumes of nutshell waste remains problematic due to their slow degradation rate and minimal incorporation into circular economy systems [4]. Pecan shells constitute approximately 40–50% of the total nut mass; however, in native and low-input systems, the shell percentage may range to 55%. The variability may influence the volume and characteristics of shell biomass available for valorization [5]. They are rich in phenolic compounds, mono- and polyunsaturated fatty acids, phytosterols, tocopherols, and essential micronutrient components known to contribute to the prevention of various chronic diseases [6]. This underutilized biomass represents a missed opportunity to develop sustainable applications that align with the principles of green chemistry and waste prevention [6]. Pecan nutshells have attracted increasing interest as a source of bioactive compounds, and higher concentrations of phenolics and flavonoids have been identified in the shells compared to the edible nut [1]. Various strategies have been developed to valorize agricultural residues, converting them into high-value-added products, such as biofuels, nutraceuticals, and sustainable materials [5]. These efforts often align with circular economy principles, which emphasize reducing waste and maximizing resource reuse, and increasingly rely on green extraction techniques that lower energy consumption and avoid using toxic solvents. The versatility of these emerging technologies highlights the largely unexplored potential of pecan processing residues as a sustainable source of natural antioxidants and bioactive compounds, with promising applications in the food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries. Recent research highlights the potential of agricultural residues, such as pecan shells, to be transformed into value-added products, including activated carbon for environmental remediation and soil amendments for agricultural use [7]. However, their widespread application remains limited without a comprehensive understanding of their long-term impacts on soil health, nutrient dynamics, and environmental risks. It is essential to investigate the physicochemical effects on soil systems to ensure safe and effective integration of pecan-based waste into sustainable agricultural practices. Developing evidence-based application rate and timing guidelines under varying conditions will guide pecan nutshell utilization while avoiding unintended environmental consequences. This review aims to explore the ecological impacts of pecan nutshell waste and examine current and emerging strategies for its valorization, particularly in the context of sustainable development goals, resource management, and circular economy principles.

2. Methods

This review followed a systematic literature review approach (Table 1) aligned with the PRISMA framework (Figure 1). A total of 231 entries were initially identified from Scopus (n = 31), Google Scholar (n = 69), and Litmaps (n = 131). After deleting 28 duplicates and grey literature, 203 articles underwent title and abstract screening. Of these, 152 papers fulfilled the preliminary eligibility criteria and underwent full-text review. Following a thorough review, 66 papers were excluded for failing to meet the study topics, and 51 were deleted for poor methodological relevance or incomplete data. Ultimately, 86 studies met all inclusion criteria and were chosen for the final systematic analysis. Extraction processes, physicochemical properties, value chain paths, and environmental uses of pecan shell-derived compounds were among the variables extracted.

3. Pecan Shells and Utilizations

3.1. Pecan Growth Areas and Other Basic Growth Conditions

Native to areas along the Mississippi River, pecans thrive in deep, fertile, and well-drained soils. Its natural habitat extends from Mexico to southern Illinois in the United States, with trees thriving in warm temperate and subtropical temperatures [8]. To optimize pecan growth, several environmental conditions must be met. Warm and long summer is preferred for pecan growth. Pecan tree growth is restricted when soil temperature falls below 18°, making deep, fertile, and well-drained soils crucial for optimal pecan growth and development [8]. Pecan trees require substantial irrigation, particularly during peak growth and nut development. In mature orchards, individual trees may need between 150 and 250 gallons of water per day, depending on the climate and soil conditions, whereas for common tree crops, such as apples, only 1–10 gallons of water is required [9,10]. On an orchard scale, drip and micro-irrigation systems are typically designed to deliver 3600 to 4000 gallons per acre per day. Comparisons among the nut trees show that the water use efficiency in pecan trees is low (about 14–30 kg nuts ha−1 cm−1) due to their high-water demand [10]. These figures vary by region, cultivar, and management intensity, but they underscore the water demands of pecan production and the importance of efficient irrigation strategies. Intense irrigation can potentially impact water resources and soil composition [11]. First-year plants start with a deep taproot, and in the following years, lateral roots and vertical absorptive root formation follow [4]. Fibrous roots and thick mycorrhizal networks greatly aid nutrient acquisition, particularly in the upper soil layers. While higher-elevation sites or gentle slopes are often recommended to reduce cold damage and improve drainage, particularly in regions prone to spring frosts or heavy rainfall, many commercial orchards, especially in the southern United States and other flatland production zones, are successfully managed on level terrain. In these settings, growers rely on cultivar selection, orchard spacing, and canopy management to mitigate disease pressure and optimize growing conditions [12].

3.2. Current Issues and Pecan Shell Composition

Pecan shells, a byproduct of the pecan nut industry, present both environmental challenges and opportunities for valorization. As with many agricultural residues, the improper disposal of pecan shells can contribute to environmental degradation, including soil and water contamination. Pesticide utilization is another concern related to the disposal or reutilization of pecan shells [13]. However, their rich chemical composition and physical characteristics make them a promising resource for value-added applications [14].
Pecan shells primarily comprise cellulose, lignin, and hemicellulose, which constitute the majority of their lignocellulosic fibers, with cellulose representing about 32–45%, hemicellulose 20–30%, and lignin 28–35% of the total biomass (Figure 2). Pecan shells also contain less than 3% protein, less than 4.5% oil, and less than 3% ash content [15]. Chemically, pecan shells are composed of bioactive compounds, including tannins and phenolic substances, which are known for their potent antioxidant properties [14]. This complex composition makes them suitable for various valorization processes, such as the production of biofuels, biochemicals, and bio-based materials. The physicochemical makeup of pecan shells raises critical environmental considerations and positions them as a valuable resource for sustainable material and energy solutions. Shell thickness and density vary among pecan cultivars, influencing the column and physical characteristics of shell biomass available for valorization. Native and low-input cultivars often produce nuts with thicker shells. Sometimes the shells account for more than 55% of the total nut mass, whereas the improved commercial cultivars tend to have thinner shells optimized for kernel yield. These differences affect the suitability of shells for specific applications. Thicker shells may be more advantageous for biochar and activated carbon production due to their higher lignin and carbon content. In comparison, thinner shells may yield higher extractable phenolics for nutraceutical usage. Understanding cultivar-specific shell trains can help tailor processing strategies and improve efficiency in pecan waste utilization. Pecan shells from different cultivars differed primarily in thickness, which further affected texture. A higher kernel percentage often indicates a thinner shell relative to the nut size. Native pecans are usually smaller with thicker shells, which would provide more shell valorization material. American improved pecan varieties often have larger nuts but thinner shells. The compounds in pecan shells can vary and play an essential role in pathogen defense [16].

3.3. Pecan Waste Valorization

The valorization of agricultural residues has emerged as a critical area of focus, employing physical, chemical, and biochemical processes to generate feeds, fuels, energy, fiber-based materials, and a wide range of high-value chemical products [5]. Technologies used for the valorization of pecan shell residues include pyrolysis and gasification for biochar and bio-oil production, hydrothermal carbonization for carbon-rich solids, and solvent-based extractions (including ethanol, supercritical CO2, and ultrasound-assisted extraction) to recover polyphenols and other bioactive compounds [17]. Mechanical grinding and defatting are used as pre-treatment steps, followed by green extraction techniques such as microwave-assisted extraction and enzyme-assisted hydrolysis for use in nutraceuticals, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics [3]. The versatility of these emerging technologies underscores the largely unexplored potential of pecan processing waste as a sustainable source of natural antioxidants and bioactive compounds, with promising applications in the food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries. By transforming this agricultural byproduct into diverse, high-value-added products, pecan shells offer a scalable, waste-reducing solution that supports global environmental sustainability goals.

3.4. Alignment with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals

Pecan shell valorization aligns well with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals for 2025, which focus on ending poverty, protecting the planet, and ensuring prosperity for all by 2023, especially for Goals 12 and 13 [18]. Goal 12 aims to decouple economic growth from environmental degradation by using resources efficiently, reducing waste, promoting green practices, and encouraging businesses to adopt sustainable models, ultimately protecting the planet for future generations. Pecan shell, a common pecan processing waste, if used wisely, could significantly contribute to sustainable goods and businesses, which, in the long term, can promote consumers’ lifestyles and awareness. All subsequent applications, from food products to materials, from environmental amendments to energy production, could contribute to sustainable goals. Meanwhile, pecan shell valorization is one strategy to adapt to climate change, which is Goal 13. To strengthen resilience and adaptive capacity to climatic disasters, sustainable products derived from large amounts of agricultural waste and food byproducts have become the optimal choices to increase capacity to meet climate change.

3.5. Bio-Energy Production Applications

Pecan nutshells, a plentiful agro-industrial byproduct, have become a significant lignocellulosic feedstock for bioenergy generation [19]. Their high carbon content, minimal ash, and high energy density render them suitable for various thermochemical and biochemical conversion processes designed to provide renewable energy and mitigate waste management [20]. By utilizing non-isothermal thermogravimetric analysis and pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS), previous studies elucidated that the thermal decomposition of pecan shells transpires through three concurrent devolatilization reactions: hemicellulose (DE-HC), cellulose (DE-CL), and lignin (DE-LG) with different degradation temperatures [20]. Three process yields were generated: biochar (solid fraction), non-condensable gases (CO2), and condensable vapors (phenols, acids, furans, and hydrocarbons). These items can also be further utilized to generate energy, enhance soil quality, and produce bio-based compounds. Based on their heating values and fixed carbon content, pecan shells are a better biomass fuel than sugarcane bagasse or rice husk. The pecan ash content made it suitable for the combustion system, with reduced slagging during combustion, which benefits heat transfer and combustion efficiency [7]. For bioenergy conversion, pecan shells can be utilized through direct combustion, pyrolysis, and gasification (Figure 3). Combustion is the quickest method to release the energy from pecan shells, which involves an oxidizer (e.g., oxygen). However, this method primarily relies on fuel in the combustion process, which can cause water, noise, and air pollution [21]. Gasification is a thermochemical process that could convert pecan shells into a gaseous product called synthesis gas (syngas). The controlled amount of oxygen will react with the pecan shells as the carbonaceous substance. Due to the high heat and oxygen, the cost will be higher than combustion. Greenhouse gas emissions and water use are key environmental concerns associated with this technology [22]. Pyrolysis is the most efficient method, producing the highest energy output and generating bio-oil, syngas, char, and other fuels. Therefore, it can play a role in creating a circular economy by transforming pecan shells into energy. Since the procedure is more complex, the initial investment cost is higher than other methods, such as combustion or gasification; however, its long-term benefits, leading to product diversity and environmental sustainability, are significant. Technologies such as fluidized bed reactors, microwave-assisted pyrolysis, and co-pyrolysis can be considered for further improvement in utilizing pecan as a bioenergy resource. Additionally, optimizing process parameters, including temperature, heating rate, and residence time, alongside pre-treatment and strategic feedstock blending, is crucial to maximizing biochar output and economic viability [22]. By incorporating these technological advances, the valorization of pecan shells can become a key component of sustainable waste management and renewable energy generation systems.
Environmentally, the bioenergy derived from pecan shells offers climate benefits without posing risks of deforestation, biodiversity loss, or conflicts over water and food security, since pecan shells are the typical by-products of pecan production. Pecan shell activated carbon can also be further modified through chemical, organic/inorganic loading, physical, and other methods. The modified activated carbon provides high adsorption capacity and can be used to remove contaminants such as heavy metals and chemical residues [23].
However, pecan shells, like other biofuels, are not always nutrient neutral, releasing greenhouse gases or pollutants [24]. Still, compared to fossil fuels, agricultural waste usually reduces greenhouse gas and pollutant emissions, without accounting for land use change. For example, biomass energy could increase ethanol combustion, further reducing carbon monoxide emissions. Compared to fossil fuels, the potential for biomass production can mitigate ecosystem loss, especially in soil systems. Meanwhile, the use of pecan shells can reduce land and water use for common bioenergy crops, such as corn, soybeans, and silver grass [25].

3.6. Bioplastics and Other Sustainable Materials

Pecan shells have promise as a source for sustainable material valorization due to their high lignocellulosic content [1]. Lignin can be extracted from pecan shells and utilized in industry, biomedicine, and agroindustry [26]. Pecans produce a significant amount of shell waste that can be used to regenerate materials, such as biodegradable plastics, replacing traditional oil-based plastics. Research on alkali-treated walnut shells has shown that surface modification with NaOH enhances their compatibility with bio-based polymers such as polylactic acid (PLA) and generates biopolymers with increased strength and thermal stability [27]. This model could be applied to pecan shells. Non-cellulosic components in pecan shells can be removed by alkali or enzymatic pretreatment, thereby increasing the material’s crystallinity and matrix adherence when used in bioplastic or composite manufacturing. The qualities of cellulose and lignin can be enhanced by additional procedures, such as mechanical dispersion or bleaching, making them suitable for bioplastics, composites, and sustainable materials (Figure 4). Lignin can be extracted from biomass through various techniques, such as organic solvent, alkaline, or enzymatic pretreatment methods. These help preserve its functional integrity and enable its application in catalyst supports, carbon materials, and biopolymer composites. Recent studies have emphasized the potential of tailored lignin structures for high-value applications, including metal catalyst carriers, biosorbents, and sustainable fillers in green materials [28]. Pecan nutshell, as a biofiller, has been used in polylactic acid materials for rigid packaging and other applications [29]. The reinforcing filler in biodegradable polymers is a cost-effective and eco-friendly material [30]. The integration of pecan shells into such goods promotes circular economy concepts and transforms agro-industrial waste into sustainable, low-cost raw materials. This strategy helps minimize agricultural residue pollution and contributes to the creation of environmentally friendly industrial materials that replace fossil-based inputs, promoting green manufacturing and sustainability.

3.7. Pecan Shells for Functional Foods

Representing up to 50% of the total nut mass, pecan shells are rich in phenolic compounds, flavonoids, tannins, and fiber, which contribute to their antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and potentially anticancer properties [5]. These functional properties make pecan shells the ideal ingredients for nutraceutical products (antioxidants, fiber, colorants) and natural preservatives (Table 2).
Many types of phenolic acids, flavonoids, and proanthocyanidins have been identified in pecan nutshells (Table 2). As one of the main byproducts of pecan, pecan shells extract contains many bioactive compounds, such as myricetin, ellagitannins, and catechins, which offer various health benefits [59]. Among the primary bioactive compounds identified in pecan shells are ellagitannins, ellagic acid, catechins, myricetin, quercetin, gallic acid, and tannins, along with a high content of dietary fiber [60]. Ellagitannins and ellagic acid, abundant in pecan shells, exhibit potent antioxidant activities due to their high phenolic content [61]. These compounds contribute to health benefits by neutralizing free radicals and may also exert anti-inflammatory and anticancer effects. The antioxidant capacity is primarily attributed to their ability to scavenge reactive oxygen species and inhibit lipid peroxidation. Moreover, ellagic acid is recognized for its role in promoting health through the gut microbiota’s conversion into urolithins, thereby enhancing bioavailability and extending its biological effects [62]. Catechins help improve cardiovascular health, reduce oxidative stress, and support neurocognitive function [63]. Myricetin and quercetin exhibit anti-diabetic, anti-inflammatory, and immune-modulatory properties, with additional roles in cancer prevention [64]. Gallic acid offers antimicrobial and antifungal properties, while tannins support gastrointestinal health and serve as natural preservatives. Moreover, the dietary fiber in pecan shells enhances gut health, regulates blood sugar, lowers cholesterol, and supports satiety, making it ideal for incorporation into nutraceuticals and clean-label functional foods [65]. These health-promoting properties, combined with advances in green extraction methods, position pecan shells as a sustainable and valuable ingredient for the development of future food and pharmaceutical products. Beyond the major bioactive compounds, pecan shells also contain a variety of secondary phenolic compounds that contribute to their overall antioxidant potential and health benefits. Ferulic acid exhibits significant antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties and is frequently used in dermatological formulations due to its ability to protect skin from oxidative damage [66]. Vanillic acid is known for its radical-scavenging activity and hepatoprotective functions, making it beneficial for liver support [67]. Caffeic acid provides both cardiovascular and antimicrobial benefits, largely through its modulation of oxidative stress and inhibition of microbial growth [41]. Thymol, a monoterpene phenol typically found in essential oils, has demonstrated strong antimicrobial and antifungal activity [46]. Taxifolin (dihydroquercetin) exhibits potent anti-inflammatory and hepatoprotective effects and contributes to vascular and immune health [45]. Syringic acid is recognized for its antioxidant and neuroprotective roles, which may contribute to the maintenance of cognitive health [47]. p-Coumaric acid has been reported to reduce lipid peroxidation and may offer anticancer potential by modulating cellular oxidative responses [48]. Finally, protocatechuic acid enhances endogenous antioxidant systems and has shown cardioprotective and anticancer properties by regulating pathways associated with oxidative stress and apoptosis [50]. Processing of functional foods from pecan shells involves drying, grinding, and defatting, followed by solvent extraction (using ethanol, water, or other environmentally friendly solvents) to obtain bioactive compounds. In line with circular economy principles, these bioactives can be sustainably extracted using green methodologies, such as microwave-assisted and ultrasound-assisted extraction, which can be optimized using response surface methodology, as demonstrated in recent studies [68]. The use of green extraction techniques to recover phenolic compounds, particularly ellagic acid, from pecan nut cake was highlighted by Rodrigues et al. and others. Green extraction techniques such as ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), and pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) offer environmentally sustainable alternatives to conventional methods by reducing energy usage, solvent consumption, and extraction time [69]. UAE improves extraction efficiency through acoustic cavitation, which enhances cell wall disruption and solvent penetration. Meanwhile, MAE uses rapid internal heating to accelerate mass transfer and shorten processing time while preserving thermolabile compounds [70]. Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) have been specifically applied to pecan and walnut shells to efficiently recover ellagic acid and other phenolics by enhancing cell wall disruption and accelerating mass transfer, respectively [71]. Additionally, pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) has been used to extract bound phenolic compounds from walnut shells at elevated pressure and temperature, reducing solvent use [72]. Several studies have used similar procedures to recover bioactive chemicals from pecan and walnut shells, with demonstrable improvements reported. For example, UAE of pecan and walnut shells produced ellagic acid concentrations ranging from 18 to 32 mg/g dry weight, depending on sonication time and solvent polarity, with a total phenolic content of up to 120 mg GAE/g [72]. Similarly, MAE has been shown to recover 20–40 mg/g of ellagic acid and other hydrolyzable tannins from nut shells, which represents a 1.5–2.0-fold increase over traditional extraction methods [70]. However, minimal research on green extraction of pecan shells, the complexity of optimization, limited applications for heat-sensitive compounds, and issues related to standardization might hinder industrial use of pecan shell extraction.
This work further emphasizes the role of pecan byproducts in promoting a sustainable and value-added agro-industrial chain, opening new opportunities to use pecan residues in developing pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and nutraceutical products. Given how inexpensive and abundant pecan waste is, funding biopharmaceutical research and development that uses this resource could reduce manufacturing costs while encouraging eco-innovation in public health. Pecan nutshells are a promising low-cost, scalable source of bioactive compounds, and including them in food systems for humans and animals not only enhances nutritional and medicinal benefits but also supports sustainability and waste reduction in agro-industries.

3.8. Activated Carbon from Pecan Shells and Its Applications

Activated carbon derived from pecan shells has shown potential as a sustainable and efficient adsorbent for both organic and inorganic pollutants in aqueous environments [7]. Due to their high carbon content, low ash, and naturally porous structure, pecan shells are considered a superior feedstock for producing granular and powdered activated carbon through pyrolysis and activation processes [73]. There is also variability in shell composition across cultivars and origins, affecting standardization. The resulting materials typically exhibit a large specific surface area and a well-developed pore structure, enabling high adsorption capacity.
Regarding inorganic contaminants, pecan shell-based activated carbon has shown strong adsorption abilities for heavy metals such as copper (Cu2+), lead (Pb2+), and cadmium (Cd2+) [74]. These pollutants are common in industrial wastewater, and removing them is vital for protecting aquatic life and human health. Compared to commercial carbons (like bituminous or coconut-based), pecan shell carbons perform equally well or better in metal removal, likely due to increased pore volume and surface functionalities formed during activation. Urban soils often face heavy metal contamination, and this pecan shell carbon could be beneficial for addressing those issues [75].
When targeting organic pollutants, these activated carbons have been used effectively to remove dyes, phenolic compounds, and pesticides from industrial effluents [76]. For example, acid-washed pecan shell carbons showed superior adsorption of methylene blue, a synthetic dye, compared to bituminous-based commercial carbons [73]. The ability to selectively adsorb both low and high-molecular-weight compounds extends their utility to textile, chemical, and pharmaceutical wastewater treatment.
Environmentally, the use of pecan shell-based activated carbon contributes to water purification, soil remediation, and the reduction in nutrient pollution. Their capacity to bind excess nutrients, pesticides, and herbicides supports safer agricultural practices and reduces the risk of groundwater contamination. These features also make them suitable for household water filtration, particularly in rural and underserved communities, thereby supporting affordable access to clean water and enhancing climate resilience. As for emerging contaminants, research on the use of pecan shell-based activated carbon for PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) removal is still limited. However, studies on activated carbon in general show that surface modification and micropore tuning can enhance PFAS adsorption, suggesting a pathway for pecan shell carbons to be adapted for such use [77].
Pecan shell-derived activated carbon offers advantages over conventional carbons in terms of cost, availability, and sustainability. Production costs remain low ($2.72–$2.89/kg), making it competitive with commercial alternatives [7]. Its use reduces biomass waste and supports circular bioeconomy strategies. Technological advances, such as microwave-assisted activation, enzymatic pretreatment, and chemical functionalization, may further improve adsorption efficiency, particularly for complex pollutants. While data on per- and polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) substances are limited, the high surface area and tunable porosity suggest future potential applicability of pecan shell-based activated carbon [78].

3.9. Soil Microbes Improvement from Pecan Shells (Figure 5)

Soil microbes are crucial to the decomposition and nutrient cycling of pecan shells, which, in turn, could contribute to soil health [79]. There are many benefits to the degradation of pecan shells for soil: (1) Soil microbes could decompose the organic matter in pecan shells, thereby mineralizing nutrients. The decomposition process could enhance soil physical properties, such as water holding capacity, nutrient retention, and soil structure [80]. Pecan shells could also increase soil phosphorus content and labile carbon content, which microbes and plants can further utilize. (2) The increased soil aggregation is attributed to microbial decomposition of organic matter and the release of microbial by-products that may bind soil particles. (3) The decomposition of pecan shells can significantly increase the abundance or diversity of beneficial bacteria and fungi. (4) Lastly, pecan shells contain many phenolic compounds, such as gallic acid, which have natural antimicrobial properties and may help manage specific microbial populations [36].
However, the impact of pecan shell soil amendment efficiency depended on soil type, with greater effects on clay loam and sandy loam soils in the short-term treatment, but not on sandy clay [81]. The optimal dosage of pecan shell and pecan shell biochar in soil requires further investigation, since studies on other nut shells indicated a dosage limit for enhancing soil microbes [82]. Disadvantages of using a large amount of pecan shells also exist. Pecan shells also contribute to a reduction in soil-available nitrogen through microbial immobilization, which can lead to plant growth deficiencies if not addressed [83]. Several strategies can be utilized to solve the problems: (1)Through the grinding process, the size of pecan shells can be vastly reduced, which can be more easily applied to an agricultural environment for crops or other plants. (2) Enzymatic treatment of pecan shells: cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin-modifying enzymes, and other enzymes can be used to break down the complex structures of pecan shells before their utilization in soils. (3) NaOH can be used to break down and remove lignin from the pecan shell structure. Through these methods, pecan shells could be efficiently utilized by soil microbes. (4) Microbial enzymatic degradation, such as anaerobic fungi-assisted decomposition processes, also occurs [84].
In addition to soil incorporation, pecan shells have also been used as mulch in horticultural and landscape settings. The application of pecan shells has increased the wet aggregate stability, thereby further enhancing resistance to erosion and improving water infiltration. The direct incorporation of ground pecan shells into arid soils can significantly improve soil structure and biological activity [85]. Their durability and slow decomposition rate make them a long-lasting option for weed suppression and moisture retention. However, minimally processed shells may contain residual kernel fragments, which can attract wildlife, such as squirrels. This characteristic may be a consideration in residential or orchard settings where animal activity is a concern. On the other hand, when properly managed, the potential benefits of pecan shell mulch can be achieved [86]. Expanding pecan shell applications through nanotechnology and building on current findings regarding the antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of pecan shell polyphenols, future research could explore their incorporation into nano-formulations to enhance therapeutic efficacy and stability. Techniques such as nanoparticle encapsulation may improve the delivery and controlled release of bioactive compounds, making them suitable for use in functional foods, pharmaceutical agents, or natural preservatives [87]. This approach, as discussed in recent studies on phenolic compound delivery systems, opens new avenues for valorizing pecan byproducts through nanotechnology-enhanced applications [87].

3.10. Pecan Shell Biochar Application in Soil

Pecan byproducts, particularly shells, have been investigated for their potential to enhance soil physical properties, improve water management, and contribute to environmental sustainability [86]. A study conducted on Norfolk loamy sand in South Carolina utilized pecan shell biochar at application rates of up to 44 tons per hectare [88]. The findings indicated that biochar significantly reduced soil penetration resistance, facilitating root development and potentially reducing the need for energy-intensive deep tillage. The biochar exhibited enhancements in water retention, although its effects on soil aggregation and infiltration were inconsistent, possibly influenced by the feedstock and production technique [76,77]. Beyond soil structure improvement, pecan shell biochar offers a range of additional applications: (1) Nutrient retention and cycling: Biochar can adsorb and slowly release essential nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus, reducing leaching losses and improving fertilizer efficiency [81]. (2) Carbon sequestration: As a stable form of organic carbon, biochar contributes to long-term carbon storage in soils, thereby playing a role in climate change mitigation [89]. (3) Heavy metal immobilization: Biochar has been shown to immobilize toxic elements such as lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), and arsenic (As), reducing their bioavailability in contaminated soils [90]. (4) Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions: When incorporated into soil, biochar can lower emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4), particularly in high-input agricultural systems [91]. (5) Microbial habitat enhancement: Its porous structure provides a favorable environment for beneficial microbial communities, enhancing soil biological activity [92]. This highlights the opportunity to optimize water utilization in pecan cultivation, particularly through adjusting irrigation in response to crop load and seasonal needs. Collectively, these studies demonstrate that pecan waste materials, in the form of biochar, compost, or effective water management practices, can enhance soil structure, nutrient accessibility, and water conservation. In a study by Garcia-Perez et al., the potential of pecan shell-derived biochar as a critical material for sustainable urban green infrastructure was emphasized [93]. The review indicates that biochars derived from lignocellulosic feedstocks, such as pecan shells, possess high carbon stability, a significant surface area, and considerable porosity. One promising avenue for urban agriculture is the use of pecan shell biochar to address soil contaminants in historically urban or industrial areas. These characteristics are particularly beneficial for enhancing soil in urban environments. In light of these findings, future research could focus on customizing pecan shell biochar for urban agriculture systems, such as container farming or vertical gardens. Its agronomic efficacy may be enhanced through functional enhancements, such as micronutrient enrichment or inoculation with plant growth-promoting microbes. In addition to promoting circular economy solutions by valorizing agricultural residues, these innovations also improve plant performance and soil health in space-limited urban settings.

4. Challenges and Future Directions

Although pecan shells present promising opportunities for conversion into biochar, bioplastics, functional food ingredients, and bioactive extracts, several challenges limit their industrial adoption. Variability in shell composition across cultivars affects extraction efficiency and standardization, while pretreatment and green extraction methods still face scalability constraints, high energy requirements, and inconsistent yields. Economic barriers, including the cost of advanced extraction technologies and limited pilot-scale infrastructure, also impede commercialization relative to competing residues such as walnut and almond shells. Environmental considerations, such as potential wastewater generation during extraction and emissions from thermochemical processes, highlight the need for optimized, low-impact processing strategies. Future efforts should focus on improving preprocessing and separation techniques, developing scalable green extraction pathways, and validating pecan-derived products through techno-economic and life-cycle assessments. Collaboration between industry and research institutions will be essential to advance high-value applications and fully integrate pecan shells into circular bioeconomy models.

5. Conclusions

This review analyzed the environmental impact of pecan nutshell waste and its numerous applications in bioenergy, material science, food, nutraceuticals, and medicine. Pecan shells, which contain a high concentration of lignocellulosic and bioactive compounds, have been found to improve soil health, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and serve as renewable inputs for sustainable energy, biodegradable composites, and antioxidant compositions. Valorization activities that use technologies like pyrolysis, green extraction, and biocomposite processing reduce environmental impact and create economic prospects, especially in rural and agro-industrial areas. Emerging research offers innovations such as biopesticides, activated carbon, antimicrobial compounds, and functional food products. However, challenges remain in scaling production, optimizing extraction techniques, and ensuring consumer safety and regulatory compliance. These methods align with circular production models and low-carbon strategies, which are increasingly important in sustainable agri-food systems. Researchers have demonstrated the increasing use of pecan byproducts and highlighted the need for ongoing research and development to overcome technical obstacles and enhance the financial and environmental benefits of pecan processing. The review highlights that pecan shells are rich in polyphenolic compounds, which possess significant antioxidant and antimicrobial properties, making them promising for applications in the pharmaceutical and food industries. A study conducted by Jéssica Vieira de Souza investigates various extraction methods, including maceration, Soxhlet, and ultrasound-assisted extraction, to isolate these bioactive compounds [94]. It emphasizes the need for further exploration of these compounds in the development of functional foods, natural preservatives, and therapeutic products. Another study conducted by Vieira de Souza underscores the sustainability and efficiency of green extraction methods, particularly ultrasound-assisted extraction in conjunction with ethanol-water solvents, as a sustainable and effective method for the isolation of valuable bioactive compounds from pecan shells [95]. Future initiatives must focus on comprehensive life cycle assessments, techno-economic studies, and multi-stakeholder cooperation to transform pecan biomass from agricultural waste into a strategic resource within circular and sustainable value chains, thereby taking advantage of these opportunities.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.W. Original draft preparation, J.L.Y.O. and Z.W. Writing-review and editing, J.L.Y.O., Z.W., M.P. and A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Hatch Program, project NO.TEX0-8117-0 funded this research—funds from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were generated from this review manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Garcia-Larez, F.L.; Tapia-Hernández, J.A.; Quintana, D.S.Z.; Moreno-Vásquez, M.J.; Rodríguez-Félix, F.; Del-Toro-Sánchez, C.L. Valorization of three pecan nutshell cultivars by ultrasound assisted extraction of polyphenolic compounds and its potential free radical inhibition. Review 2022, preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, R.; Peng, F.; Li, Y. Pecan production in China. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 197, 719–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jimenez, M.E.C.; Gabilondo, J.; Bodoira, R.M.; Laverde, L.M.A.; Santagapita, P.R. Extraction of bioactive compounds from pecan nutshell: An added-value and low-cost alternative for an industrial waste. Food Chem. 2024, 453, 139596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fronza, D.; Hamann, J.J.; Both, V.; Anese, R.D.O.; Meyer, E.A. Pecan cultivation: General aspects. Cienc. Rural 2018, 48, e20170179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Santana-Méridas, O.; González-Coloma, A.; Sánchez-Vioque, R. Agricultural residues as a source of bioactive natural products. Phytochem. Rev. 2012, 11, 447–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hidalgo, A.I.C.; Aguirre, M.R.; Valenzuela, E.; Gomez, J.Y.V.; Dávila, A.C.; Varma, R.S.; Sánchez, V.H.R. Sustainable application of pecan nutshell waste: Greener synthesis of Pd-based nanocatalysts for electro-oxidation of methanol. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 23329–23335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ng, C.; E Marshall, W.; Rao, R.M.; Bansode, R.R.; Losso, J.N. Activated carbon from pecan shell: Process description and economic analysis. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2003, 17, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Panta, S.; Zhou, B.; Zhu, L.; Maness, N.; Rohla, C.; Costa, L.; Ampatzidis, Y.; Fontainer, C.; Kaur, A.; Zhang, L. Selecting non-linear mixed effect model for growth and development of pecan nut. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 309, 111614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lang, J. How to Properly Water Your Trees. Available online: https://www.arborday.org/perspectives/how-properly-water-your-trees#:~:text=How%20Much,just%20use%20your%20best%20guess (accessed on 11 December 2025).
  10. Wang, J.; Miller, D.R.; Sammis, T.W.; Gutschick, V.P.; Simmons, L.J.; Andales, A.A. Energy balance measurements and a simple model for estimating pecan water use efficiency. Agric. Water Manag. 2007, 91, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wells, L. Pecan Water Requirements and Irrigation Scheduling. In UGA Cooperative Extension Circular; University of Georgia Department of Horticulture: Athens, GA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  12. Parker, M.; Sorensen, K.; Brock, J. Growing Pecans in North Carolina (Revised AG-81). In North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service; NC State University: Raleigh, NC, USA, 2016; Available online: http://content.ces.ncsu.edu/growing-pecans-in-north-carolina (accessed on 30 July 2025).
  13. Shapiro-Ilan, D.I.; Cottrell, T.E.; Jackson, M.A.; Wood, B.W. Control of Key Pecan Insect Pests Using Biorational Pesticides. J. Econ. Entomol. 2013, 106, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dunford, N.T.; Gumus, Z.P.; Gur, C.S. Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Properties of Pecan Shell Water Extracts. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Prasad, R.B.N. WALNUTS AND PECANS. In Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 6071–6079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yemmireddy, V.K.; Cason, C.; Moreira, J.; Adhikari, A. Effect of pecan variety and the method of extraction on the antimicrobial activity of pecan shell extracts against different foodborne pathogens and their efficacy on food matrices. Food Control. 2020, 112, 107098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Littlefield, B. Characterization of Pecan Shells for Value-added Applications. Master’s Thesis, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  18. United Nations. The Sustainable Development Goals Report. 2025. Available online: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2025 (accessed on 15 December 2025).
  19. La Peña, M.M.-D.; Rábago-Panduro, L.M.; Martín-Belloso, O.; Welti-Chanes, J. Challenges and Benefits of Using Pecan Kernels, Derivatives, and Byproducts as Alternative Ingredients in Food Product Development. Food Rev. Int. 2023, 39, 2530–2542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mumbach, G.D.; Alves, J.L.F.; da Silva, J.C.G.; Di Domenico, M.; Arias, S.; Pacheco, J.G.A.; Marangoni, C.; Machado, R.A.F.; Bolzan, A. Prospecting pecan nutshell pyrolysis as a source of bioenergy and bio-based chemicals using multicomponent kinetic modeling, thermodynamic parameters estimation, and Py-GC/MS analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 153, 111753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Grande, L.; Pedroarena, I.; Korili, S.A.; Gil, A. Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Biomass as One of the Most Promising Alternatives for the Synthesis of Advanced Liquid Biofuels: A Review. Materials 2021, 14, 5286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kundariya, N.; Mohanty, S.S.; Varjani, S.; Ngo, H.H.; Wong, J.W.C.; Taherzadeh, M.J.; Chang, J.-S.; Ng, H.Y.; Kim, S.-H.; Bui, X.-T. A review on integrated approaches for municipal solid waste for environmental and economical relevance: Monitoring tools, technologies, and strategic innovations. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 342, 125982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mariana, M.; Hps, A.K.; Mistar, E.; Yahya, E.B.; Alfatah, T.; Danish, M.; Amayreh, M. Recent advances in activated carbon modification techniques for enhanced heavy metal adsorption. J. Water Process. Eng. 2021, 43, 102221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Searchinger, T.; Heimlich, R.; Houghton, R.A.; Dong, F.; Elobeid, A.; Fabiosa, J.; Tokgoz, S.; Hayes, D.; Yu, T.-H. Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change. Science 2008, 319, 1238–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ale, S.; Femeena, P.V.; Mehan, S.; Cibin, R. Environmental impacts of bioenergy crop production and benefits of multifunctional bioenergy systems. In Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 195–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nadányi, R.; Džuganová, M.; Ház, A.A. Optimized Lignin Recovery From Black Liquor For Enhanced Mechanical Properties of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Rubber Composites. Acta Fac. Xylologiae Zvolen 2024, 66, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Orue, A.; Eceiza, A.; Arbelaiz, A. The use of alkali treated walnut shells as filler in plasticized poly(lactic acid) matrix composites. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2020, 145, 111993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mennani, M.; Kasbaji, M.; Benhamou, A.A.; Boussetta, A.; Kassab, Z.; El Achaby, M.; Grimi, N.; Moubarik, A. The potential of lignin-functionalized metal catalysts—A systematic review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 189, 113936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sánchez-Acosta, D.; Rodriguez-Uribe, A.; Álvarez-Chávez, C.R.; Mohanty, A.K.; Misra, M.; López-Cervantes, J.; Madera-Santana, T.J. Physicochemical Characterization and Evaluation of Pecan Nutshell as Biofiller in a Matrix of Poly(lactic acid). J. Polym. Environ. 2019, 27, 521–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Agustin-Salazar, S.; Ricciulli, M.; Ambrogi, V.; Cerruti, P.; Scarinzi, G. Thermomechanical Properties and Biodegradation Behavior of Itaconic Anhydride-Grafted PLA/Pecan Nutshell Biocomposites. Polymers 2022, 14, 5532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Raya-Morquecho, E.M.; Aguilar-Zarate, P.; Sepúlveda, L.; Michel, M.R.; Iliná, A.; Aguilar, C.N.; Ascacio-Valdés, J.A. Ellagitannins and Their Derivatives: A Review on the Metabolization, Absorption, and Some Benefits Related to Intestinal Health. Microbiol. Res. 2025, 16, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. De La Rosa, L.A.; Alvarez-Parrilla, E.; Shahidi, F. Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Kernels and Shells of Mexican Pecan (Carya illinoinensis). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Harper, P. A Review of the Dietary Intake, Bioavailability and Health Benefits of Ellagic Acid (EA) with a Primary Focus on Its Anti-Cancer Properties. Cureus 2023, 15, e43156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cason, C.; Yemmireddy, V.K.; Moreira, J.; Adhikari, A. Antioxidant Properties of Pecan Shell Bioactive Components of Different Cultivars and Extraction Methods. Foods 2021, 10, 713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Almatroodi, S.A.; Rahmani, A.H. Unlocking the Pharmacological Potential of Myricetin Against Various Pathogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 4188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, C.Y. Pecan shell by-products—Phenolic compound contents and antimicrobial properties. AIMS Agric. Food 2020, 5, 218–232. [Google Scholar]
  37. Mateș, L.; Banc, R.; Zaharie, F.A.; Rusu, M.E.; Popa, D.-S. Mechanistic Insights into the Biological Effects and Antioxidant Activity of Walnut (Juglans regia L.) Ellagitannins: A Systematic Review. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Srinivasan, M.; Sudheer, A.R.; Menon, V.P. Ferulic Acid: Therapeutic Potential Through Its Antioxidant Property. J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr. 2007, 40, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Khoddami, A.; Wilkes, M.; Roberts, T. Techniques for Analysis of Plant Phenolic Compounds. Molecules 2013, 18, 2328–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Badhani, B.; Sharma, N.; Kakkar, R. Gallic acid: A versatile antioxidant with promising therapeutic and industrial applications. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 27540–27557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cory, H.; Passarelli, S.; Szeto, J.; Tamez, M.; Mattei, J. The Role of Polyphenols in Human Health and Food Systems: A Mini-Review. Front. Nutr. 2018, 5, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kosker, A.R.; Özogul, F.; Durmus, M.; Ucar, Y.; Ayas, D.; Regenstein, J.M.; Özogul, Y. Tetrodotoxin levels in pufferfish (Lagocephalus sceleratus) caught in the Northeastern Mediterranean Sea. Food Chem. 2016, 210, 332–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ultee, A.; Slump, R.A.; Steging, G.; Smid, E.J. Antimicrobial Activity of Carvacrol toward Bacillus cereus on Rice. J. Food Prot. 2000, 63, 620–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, X.W.; Tan, B.Z.; Sun, M.; Ho, B.; Ding, J.L. Thioredoxin-like 6 protects retinal cell line from photooxidative damage by upregulating NF-κB activity. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2008, 45, 336–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ding, C.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, X.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, W.; Liu, X. Taxifolin, a novel food, attenuates acute alcohol-induced liver injury in mice through regulating the NF-κB-mediated inflammation and PI3K/Akt signalling pathways. Pharm. Biol. 2021, 59, 866–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gao, Q.; Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Liang, Y. Antioxidant and prooxidant activities of phenolic acids commonly existed in vegetables and their relationship with structures. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 42, e07622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nile, S.H.; Park, S.W. Edible berries: Bioactive components and their effect on human health. Nutrition 2014, 30, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Clemente-Suárez, V.J.; Martín-Rodríguez, A.; Beltrán-Velasco, A.I.; Rubio-Zarapuz, A.; Martínez-Guardado, I.; Valcárcel-Martín, R.; Tornero-Aguilera, J.F. Functional and Therapeutic Roles of Plant-Derived Antioxidants in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Considerations for Special Populations. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Naz, R.; Saqib, F.; Awadallah, S.; Wahid, M.; Latif, M.F.; Iqbal, I.; Mubarak, M.S. Food Polyphenols and Type II Diabetes Mellitus: Pharmacology and Mechanisms. Molecules 2023, 28, 3996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Kakkar, S.; Bais, S. A Review on Protocatechuic Acid and Its Pharmacological Potential. ISRN Pharmacol. 2014, 2014, 952943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Li, S.; Li, S.; Semde, R.; Teng, H.; Shi, M.; Huang, L.; Lou, X.; Jia, B.; Zhu, H.; Zhao, Y. Protocatechuic Acid Improves Alzheimer’s Disease by Regulating the Cholinergic Synaptic Signaling Pathway. Chem. Biodivers. 2025, 22, e202402771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Trevisan, G.; Rossato, M.F.; Hoffmeister, C.; Müller, L.G.; Pase, C.; Córdova, M.M.; Rosa, F.; Tonello, R.; Hausen, B.S.; Boligon, A.A.; et al. Antinociceptive and antiedematogenic effect of pecan ( Carya illinoensis ) nut shell extract in mice: A possible beneficial use for a by-product of the nut industry. J. Basic Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2014, 25, 401–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. El Hawary, S.S.; Saad, S.; El Halawany, A.M.; Ali, Z.Y.; El Bishbishy, M. Phenolic content and anti-hyperglycemic activity of pecan cultivars from Egypt. Pharm. Biol. 2016, 54, 788–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. FloresCordova, M.; Snchez, E.; MuozMrquez, E.; OjedaBarrios, D.; SotoParra, J.; PreciadoRangel, P. Phytochemical composition and antioxidant capacity in Mexican pecan nut. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2017, 29, 346–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hilbig, J.; Policarpi, P.d.B.; Grinevicius, V.M.A.d.S.; Mota, N.S.R.S.; Toaldo, I.M.; Luiz, M.T.B.; Pedrosa, R.C.; Block, J.M. Aqueous extract from pecan nut [Carya illinoinensis (Wangenh) C. Koch] shell show activity against breast cancer cell line MCF-7 and Ehrlich ascites tumor in Balb-C mice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 211, 256–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. do Prado, A.C.P.; da Silva, H.S.; da Silveira, S.M.; Barreto, P.L.M.; Vieira, C.R.W.; Maraschin, M.; Ferreira, S.R.S.; Block, J.M. Effect of the extraction process on the phenolic compounds profile and the antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of extracts of pecan nut [Carya illinoinensis (Wangenh) C. Koch] shell. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2014, 52, 552–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Vazquez-Flores, A.; Wong-Paz, J.; Lerma-Herrera, M.; Martinez-Gonzalez, A.; Olivas-Aguirre, F.; Aguilar, C.; Wall-Medrano, A.; Gonzalez-Aguilar, G.; Alvarez-Parrilla, E.; de la Rosa, L. Proanthocyanidins from the kernel and shell of pecan (Carya illinoinensis): Average degree of polymerization and effects on carbohydrate, lipid, and peptide hydrolysis in a simulated human digestive system. J. Funct. Foods 2017, 28, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lerma-Herrera, M.A.; Núñez-Gastélum, J.A.; Ascacio-Valdés, J.; Aguilar, C.N.; Rodrigo-García, J.; Díaz-Sánchez, A.G.; Alvarez-Parrilla, E.; de la Rosa, L.A. Estimation of the Mean Degree of Polymerization of Condensed Tannins from the Kernel and Shell of Carya illinoinensis by HPLC/MS and Spectrophotometric Methods. Food Anal. Methods 2017, 10, 3023–3031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chamorro, F.; Carpena, M.; Fraga-Corral, M.; Echave, J.; Rajoka, M.S.R.; Barba, F.J.; Cao, H.; Xiao, J.; Prieto, M.; Simal-Gandara, J. Valorization of kiwi agricultural waste and industry by-products by recovering bioactive compounds and applications as food additives: A circular economy model. Food Chem. 2022, 370, 131315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. de la Rosa, L.A.; Vazquez-Flores, A.A.; Alvarez-Parrilla, E.; Rodrigo-García, J.; Medina-Campos, O.N.; Ávila-Nava, A.; González-Reyes, S.; Pedraza-Chaverri, J. Content of major classes of polyphenolic compounds, antioxidant, antiproliferative, and cell protective activity of pecan crude extracts and their fractions. J. Funct. Foods 2014, 7, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rodrigues, N.P.; Pechina, B.D.R.; Sarkis, J.R. A comprehensive approach to pecan nut valorization: Extraction and characterization of soluble and insoluble-bound phenolics. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2022, 99, 843–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Vattem, D.A.; Shetty, K. BIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONALITY OF ELLAGIC ACID: A REVIEW. J. Food Biochem. 2005, 29, 234–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bae, J.; Kim, N.; Shin, Y.; Kim, S.-Y.; Kim, Y.-J. Activity of catechins and their applications. Biomed. Dermatol. 2020, 4, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Taheri, Y.; Suleria, H.A.R.; Martins, N.; Sytar, O.; Beyatli, A.; Yeskaliyeva, B.; Seitimova, G.; Salehi, B.; Semwal, P.; Painuli, S.; et al. Myricetin bioactive effects: Moving from preclinical evidence to potential clinical applications. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2020, 20, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Dolan, L.; Matulka, R.; Worn, J.; Nizio, J. Safety studies conducted on pecan shell fiber, a food ingredient produced from ground pecan shells. Toxicol. Rep. 2016, 3, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Smolskaya, S.; Logashina, Y.A.; Andreev, Y.A. Escherichia coli Extract-Based Cell-Free Expression System as an Alternative for Difficult-to-Obtain Protein Biosynthesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Ansari, M.I.; Dubey, N.; Ganeshpurkar, A. Hepatoprotective potential of vanillic acid against isoniazid-rifampicin-induced liver toxicity. Asp. Mol. Med. 2025, 5, 100087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Alasalvar, C.; Huang, G.; Bolling, B.W.; Jantip, P.; Pegg, R.B.; Wong, X.K.; Chang, S.K.; Pelvan, E.; de Camargo, A.C.; Mandalari, G.; et al. Upcycling commercial nut byproducts for food, nutraceutical, and pharmaceutical applications: A comprehensive review. Food Chem. 2025, 467, 142222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bezerra, F.D.S.; Koblitz, M.G.B. Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Agro-Industrial By-Products Using Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents: A Review of Green and Advanced Techniques. Separations 2025, 12, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wen, L.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, D.-W.; Sivagnanam, S.P.; Tiwari, B.K. Combination of emerging technologies for the extraction of bioactive compounds. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 1826–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Vinatoru, M.; Mason, T.J.; Calinescu, I. Ultrasonically assisted extraction (UAE) and microwave assisted extraction (MAE) of functional compounds from plant materials. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2017, 97, 159–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Da Silva, J.; Da Silva, A.F.V.; Cesca, K.; Ribeiro, P.R.V.; De Brito, E.S.; Ferreira, S.R.S. Efficient and sustainable recovery of bioactive compounds from cashew nut testa shell (Anacardium occidentale L.) using pressurized liquid extraction. In Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Niandou, M.A.S.; Novak, J.M.; Bansode, R.R.; Yu, J.; Rehrah, D.; Ahmedna, M. Selection of Pecan Shell–Based Activated Carbons for Removal of Organic and Inorganic Impurities from Water. J. Environ. Qual. 2013, 42, 902–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Bansode, R. Treatment of Organic and Inorganic Pollutants in Municipal Wastewater by Agricultural By-Product Based Granular Activated Carbons (GAC). Master’s Thesis, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, LA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Goncharov, G.; Soktoev, B.; Farkhutdinov, I.; Matveenko, I. Heavy metals in urban soil: Contamination levels, spatial distribution and human health risk assessment (the case of Ufa city, Russia). Environ. Res. 2024, 257, 119216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bansode, R.R.; Losso, J.N.; Marshall, W.E.; Rao, R.M.; Portier, R.J. Pecan shell-based granular activated carbon for treatment of chemical oxygen demand (COD) in municipal wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 94, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Appleman, T.D.; Higgins, C.P.; Quiñones, O.; Vanderford, B.J.; Kolstad, C.; Zeigler-Holady, J.C.; Dickenson, E.R. Treatment of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances in U.S. full-scale water treatment systems. Water Res. 2014, 51, 246–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Johns, M.M.; Marshall, W.E.; Toles, C.A. The effect of activation method on the properties of pecan shell-activated carbons. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 1999, 74, 1037–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Herrera, E.; Lindemann, W. Nitrogen Movement in the Soil-Pecan Tree System. New Mexico State University Cooperative Extension Service Guide H-651. Las Cruces, NM. 2001. Available online: https://pubs.nmsu.edu/_h/H651.pdf (accessed on 30 July 2025).
  80. Wang, Z.; Zhou, M.; Liu, H.; Huang, C.; Ma, Y.; Ge, H.X.; Ge, X.; Fu, S. Pecan agroforestry systems improve soil quality by stimulating enzyme activity. PeerJ 2022, 10, e12663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Idowu, O.J.; Sanogo, S.; Brewer, C.E. Short-Term Impacts of Pecan Waste By-Products on Soil Quality in Texturally Different Arid Soils. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2017, 48, 1781–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhou, J.; Hong, W.; Feng, J.; Song, L.; Li, X.; Xu, S.; Zhou, S. Effects of applying peanut shell and its biochar on the microbial activity and community structure of dryland red soil. Heliyon 2023, 9, e12604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Burger, M.; Jackson, L.E. Microbial immobilization of ammonium and nitrate in relation to ammonification and nitrification rates in organic and conventional cropping systems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2003, 35, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Saye, L.M.G.; Navaratna, T.A.; Chong, J.P.J.; O’Malley, M.A.; Theodorou, M.K.; Reilly, M. The Anaerobic Fungi: Challenges and Opportunities for Industrial Lignocellulosic Biofuel Production. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhang, Y.; Idowu, O.; Brewer, C. Using Agricultural Residue Biochar to Improve Soil Quality of Desert Soils. Agriculture 2016, 6, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Martínez-Casillas, D.; Mascorro-Gutiérrez, I.; Arreola-Ramos, C.; Villafán-Vidales, H.; Arancibia-Bulnes, C.; Ramos-Sánchez, V.; Cuentas-Gallegos, A. A sustainable approach to produce activated carbons from pecan nutshell waste for environmentally friendly supercapacitors. Carbon 2019, 148, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Neira-Vielma, A.A.; Meléndez-Ortiz, H.I.; García-López, J.I.; Sanchez-Valdes, S.; Cruz-Hernández, M.A.; Rodríguez-González, J.G.; Ramírez-Barrón, S.N. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Pecan Nut (Carya illinoinensis) Shell Extracts and Evaluation of Their Antimicrobial Activity. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Busscher, W.J.; Novak, J.M.; Evans, D.E.; Watts, D.W.; Niandou, M.A.S.; Ahmedna, M. Influence of Pecan Biochar on Physical Properties of a Norfolk Loamy Sand. Soil Sci. 2010, 175, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zhang, M.; Peng, F.; Yu, J.; Liu, Z. Feedstock-Induced Changes in the Physicochemical Characteristics of Biochars Produced from Different Types of Pecan Wastes. Forests 2024, 15, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Khurshid, K.; Nawaz, R.; Khalid, A.; Mahmood, S.; Qadeer, S.; Hanafiah, M.M.; Anjum, M. Optimization of Heavy Metals Removal Through Pecan Shell-Based Modified Activated Carbon from Pharmaceutical Wastewater and Evaluation of the Treated Effluent for Irrigating Pisum sativum. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2025, 19, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Pereira, E.I.P.; Suddick, E.C.; Six, J. Carbon Abatement and Emissions Associated with the Gasification of Walnut Shells for Bioenergy and Biochar Production. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0150837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Jiang, Z.; Li, Q.; Peng, F.; Yu, J. Biochar Loaded with a Bacterial Strain N33 Facilitates Pecan Seedling Growth and Shapes Rhizosphere Microbial Community. Plants 2024, 13, 1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Senadheera, S.S.; Withana, P.A.; Lim, J.Y.; You, S.; Chang, S.X.; Wang, F.; Rhee, J.H.; Ok, Y.S. Carbon negative biochar systems contribute to sustainable urban green infrastructure: A critical review. Green Chem. 2024, 26, 10634–10660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Dueñas, J.V. Antioxidant Properties and Applications of Pecan (Carya illinoinensis (Wangenh.) K. Koch). Ph.D. Thesis, UPC Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, 2021. Available online: https://upcommons.upc.edu/entities/publication/9abe4078-6cb6-4651-a464-002cad8712e1 (accessed on 30 July 2025).
  95. Carrasco, J.C., Jr. Sustainable Disposal Of Pecan Shells. Master’s Thesis, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
Foods 15 00168 g001
Figure 1. PRISMA-based workflow of study selection in the systematic review.
Figure 1. PRISMA-based workflow of study selection in the systematic review.
Foods 15 00168 g001
Foods 15 00168 g002
Figure 2. Pecan shell composition. The Unit CE represents catechin equivalents; GAE represents gallic acid equivalents.
Figure 2. Pecan shell composition. The Unit CE represents catechin equivalents; GAE represents gallic acid equivalents.
Foods 15 00168 g002
Foods 15 00168 g003
Figure 3. Bio-energy production with pecan shells.
Figure 3. Bio-energy production with pecan shells.
Foods 15 00168 g003
Foods 15 00168 g004
Figure 4. Pecan shell utilization in materials.
Figure 4. Pecan shell utilization in materials.
Foods 15 00168 g004
Foods 15 00168 g005
Figure 5. Pecan shell application to soil.
Figure 5. Pecan shell application to soil.
Foods 15 00168 g005
Table 1. Screening and selection criteria for study inclusion and exclusion.
Table 1. Screening and selection criteria for study inclusion and exclusion.
Document Inclusion CriteriaDocument Exclusion Criteria
Article Published In English Non-English publications
Peer-reviewed original research articles and reviewsTheses, dissertations, conference abstracts, book chapters, non-peer-reviewed material
Studies published between 2005 and 2025Studies published before 2005
Studies related to pecan or walnut shell valorization, biochar, activated carbon, extraction of phenolics, or circular bioeconomyStudies unrelated to nutshell valorization, extraction, or environmental applications
Articles reporting extraction techniques, adsorption properties, physicochemical characterization, bioactive compound yields, or environmental applicationsArticles that focus solely on agronomic traits, food chemistry unrelated to shell valorization, or non-material uses
Table 2. Bioactive compounds of pecan shell: structures and health-promoting functions.
Table 2. Bioactive compounds of pecan shell: structures and health-promoting functions.
Bioactive Compounds Group Structure Representative FunctionsTypical Extraction Yield (%)BioavailabilityIndustrial Application PotentialExtraction Reference
Benzoic acid Hydroxybenzoic acidsFoods 15 00168 i001Regulate gut functions0.2–1.0%High (well absorbed, rapid metabolism)Food preservative, antimicrobial agent[14,31]
Ellagic acidHydroxybenzoic acidsFoods 15 00168 i002Against oxidation-linked chronic diseases such as cancer and cardiovascular diseases0.1–0.5%Low (poor solubility, slow absorption)Nutraceuticals, anti-aging cosmetics[32,33]
Gallic acid Hydroxybenzoic acidsFoods 15 00168 i003Antioxidant, anticancer, antimicrobial, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, metabolic, neuropsychological and miscellaneous diseases 1–5%Moderate–HighNatural antioxidant, pharmaceuticals[34,35]
p-Hydroxy benzoic acidHydroxybenzoic acidsFoods 15 00168 i004Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and intestinal barrier-repairing effects0.2–1.2%ModerateCosmetic preservatives (parabens precursor)[33,36]
Protocatechuic acid Hydroxybenzoic acidsFoods 15 00168 i005Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory,
Neuroprotective properties		0.3–2.0%ModerateAnti-inflammatory and neuroprotective ingredients[33,36]
Pyrogallic acidHydroxybenzoic acidsFoods 15 00168 i006Reducing agent (such as metal), antiseptic properties0.1–0.3%ModerateHair dyes, inks, metal processing[32,37]
Vanillic acidHydroxybenzoic acidsFoods 15 00168 i007Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-cancer0.2–1.5%ModerateFlavoring, fragrance industry[38]
2-Hydroxycinnamic acidHydroxycinnamic acid derivativesFoods 15 00168 i008Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial agent0.3–1.8%ModerateFood additives, antimicrobial coatings[39,40]
Chlorogenic acidHydroxycinnamic acid derivativesFoods 15 00168 i009Regulate blood sugar, lipid metabolism, anti-inflammatory, and anti-obesity 0.5–6%Low-moderateAnti-obesity supplements, cosmetics[41]
Ferulic acidHydroxycinnamic acid derivativesFoods 15 00168 i010Anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial properties0.4–2.5%ModerateUV-protective cosmetics, food antioxidants[42,43]
Caffeic acidHydroxycinnamic acid derivativesFoods 15 00168 i011Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer properties0.4–3.0%Moderate-HighNatural preservatives, skincare products[44,45]
Hesperetin FlavonesFoods 15 00168 i012Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective properties0.05–0.3%LowFunctional beverages, supplements[46,47]
KaempferolFlavonolsFoods 15 00168 i013Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory agent 0.1–1.2%Low (poor water solubility)Anti-cancer research, nutraceuticals[48,49]
Quercetin FlavonolsFoods 15 00168 i014Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory agent 0.2–2.0%Low–Moderate (improves with glycosides)Nutraceuticals, anti-allergy formulations[50,51]
Rutin FlavonolsFoods 15 00168 i015Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory agent 0.1–1.0%LowVascular supplements, pharmaceuticals[52]
NaringeninFlavanonesFoods 15 00168 i016Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, anti-diabetic, and neuroprotective effects0.05–0.4%LowDiabetes-related supplements[53]
Catechin Monomeric flavan-3-olsFoods 15 00168 i017Antioxidant, neuroprotective, anti-cancer 0.3–3.8%High Functional beverages, pharmaceuticals[54]
EpicatechinMonomeric flavan-3-olsFoods 15 00168 i018Antioxidant, nitric oxide production, improve blood flow, enhance muscle growth 0.3–4.0%HighSports nutrition, cardiovascular supplements[55]
Epicatechin gallateMonomeric flavan-3-olsFoods 15 00168 i019Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, cardiovascular health, cancer chemoprevention, and neuroprotective properties 0.1–1.2%ModerateCardioprotective formulations[55]
EpigallocatechinMonomeric flavan-3-olsFoods 15 00168 i020Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-carcinogenic, neuroprotective, and anti-fibrotic properties 0.2–1.5%ModerateCosmetic antioxidant, nutraceuticals[56]
Procyanidins Oligo and polymeric flavan-3-olsFoods 15 00168 i021Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, cardioprotective, anti-cancer, neuroprotective, and metabolic health1–10% (highest yield class)Low–Moderate (large molecules)Cocoa extracts, cardioprotective nutraceuticals[57]
Procyanidin B1 (B-type dimer)Oligo and polymeric flavan-3-olsFoods 15 00168 i022Anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative processes 0.5–4%LowFunctional foods, pharmaceuticals[58]
Procyanidin B2 (B-type dimer)Oligo and polymeric flavan-3-olsFoods 15 00168 i023Cardiovascular health, metabolic regulation, wound healing, neuroprotection, reproductive health, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant 0.5–4%LowHigh-value nutraceuticals[58]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Omotonoko, J.L.Y.; Polozola, M.; Svyantek, A.; Wang, Z. Valorization and Environmental Impacts of Pecan Waste: A Critical Review. Foods 2026, 15, 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15010168

AMA Style

Omotonoko JLY, Polozola M, Svyantek A, Wang Z. Valorization and Environmental Impacts of Pecan Waste: A Critical Review. Foods. 2026; 15(1):168. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15010168

Chicago/Turabian Style

Omotonoko, Jean Louis Yannick, Michael Polozola, Andrej Svyantek, and Zhuoyu Wang. 2026. "Valorization and Environmental Impacts of Pecan Waste: A Critical Review" Foods 15, no. 1: 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15010168

APA Style

Omotonoko, J. L. Y., Polozola, M., Svyantek, A., & Wang, Z. (2026). Valorization and Environmental Impacts of Pecan Waste: A Critical Review. Foods, 15(1), 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15010168

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop