Next Article in Journal
Addition of Lactobacillus fermentum to Fermented Sea Buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) Fruit Vinegar Significantly Improves Its Sour Taste
Previous Article in Journal
Physical, Mechanical, Barrier, and Optical Properties of Sodium Alginate/Gum Arabic/Gluten Edible Films Plasticized with Glycerol and Sorbitol
Previous Article in Special Issue
Quantitative Prediction of Protein Content in Corn Kernel Based on Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Recent Advances in the Assessment of Cereal and Cereal-Based Product Quality

1
Department of Animal, Veterinary and Food Sciences, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Dr., Moscow, ID 83844, USA
2
Food Science Department, Purdue University, 745 Agriculture Mall Dr., West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2025, 14(7), 1220; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14071220
Submission received: 10 March 2025 / Revised: 13 March 2025 / Accepted: 15 March 2025 / Published: 31 March 2025
Cereals are rich in nutrients, such as carbohydrates, fats, proteins, vitamins, and minerals, which make them a very important source of food for the human diet and human health [1,2]. Cereals are typically milled into flours with the goal of mixing them with water and other ingredients to obtain end products with specific quality attributes for the manufacture of bakery and extruded cereal-based products. They are also used as animal feed and human food for enriching the fiber content of foods [3]. The quality of these products greatly depends on the quality and the processing of cereal grains [2]. Therefore, quality assessment of cereal grains and their end-products is an important aspect of the processing and safety of cereal foods [1,4].
Traditional methods used for cereal quality assessment involve wet chemistry methods, high-performance liquid chromatography, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, gas chromatography, etc. [1,2]. Even though, these traditional cereal testing methods have been widely accepted and found to be useful by industry to predict end-product quality, there are some limitations associated with them. For instance, they are time- and labor-intensive, often destructive, costly, highly empirical, and non-food-grade chemical-dependent, making them often toxic and harmful to analysts and the environment [1,2,5]. Therefore, recent novel techniques have been used in the cereal science world for the assessment of the quality of cereals and cereal-based products. These techniques include fundamental rheology [6,7,8], bioinformatic modeling [9,10], imaging techniques (i.e., x-ray microtomography [11,12,13], magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [14,15]), spectroscopy techniques (i.e., near infrared (NIR) [2,16,17], FTIR [18,19,20,21], Raman [17,22,23], nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [24,25,26]), 3-D printing technology [27,28] and more.
Physical properties of cereal grains are among the most important parameters defining grain quality. Physically damaged kernels during mechanical harvesting and in the subsequent handling operations make cereals more susceptible to damage from fungi and insects [29]. A significant amount of mechanical damage in kernels leads to a lower grade product with lower market value [30]. Fan et al. [31] used machine vision and machine learning algorithms to develop methods of online rapid detection of the broken corn kernel rate.
Composition of cereals and in particular protein content is known to have a significant effect on end-product quality [32,33,34]. Fan et al. [35] used NIR spectroscopy combined with machine learning algorithms to predict the protein content and its impact on corn kernel quality. Mefleh et al. [36] studied the impact of wheat clipping on the nitrogen content and protein composition in ancient wheats grown in the Mediterranean region. The clipping technique was used to modify grain protein fractions under varying climate conditions. Therefore, it was suggested as a tool to improve the technological quality of grain, rheological properties of the resulting dough, and end-product quality.
Characterization of the rheological properties of cereal flour doughs enables prediction of both the quality of the raw material and the textural characteristics of the end-product [8,33,34]. In the cereal literature, the rheological properties of doughs are commonly determined through empirical methods. Although empirical methods are useful in industrial applications, they provide data in arbitrary units, leading to a difficulty in fundamental interpretation of the results [37]. Yazar [38] reviewed the application of fundamental non-linear rheological tests to offer a more accurate tool to determine the processing quality of wheat flours.
Other studies in this special issue focused on the utilization of novel techniques to improve the nutritional quality of the cereal-based foods. Increasing the dietary fiber intake is globally a key strategy to improve consumer health. For this purpose, the consumption of high-fiber foods, mainly whole grain products, has been promoted. However, whole grain foods have lower acceptability compared to products made from white flour [39]. Sempio et al. [40] used Surface Response Methodology (RSM) as a statistical tool to increase the dietary fiber content of bread. The RSM technique helped optimizing a fiber mixture that could improve the dietary fiber content of bread without altering the desired quality attributes of white wheat bread.
Another global issue for the food industry is to develop new pathways to meet the rising food demand against the continuous increase in the global population and the challenges for environmental sustainability [41,42]. Herdeiro et al. [43] investigated the possibility to develop healthy cereal-based snacks with added edible insects as an alternative protein source. In this study, they used the 3D printing technology to explore its potential in designing novel foods.
The studies in this special issue provide an overall insight into the applications of novel techniques to improve the quality of cereals and cereal-based traditional and future foods.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.Y. and J.L.K.; writing—original draft preparation, G.Y.; writing—review and editing, G.Y. and J.L.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zareef, M.; Arslan, M.; Hassan, M.M.; Ahmad, W.; Ali, S.; Li, H.; Ouyang, Q.; Wu, X.; Hashim, M.M.; Chen, Q. Recent advances in assessing qualitative and quantitative aspects of cereals using nondestructive techniques: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 116, 815–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. An, D.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Z.; Liu, J.; Wei, Y. Advances in infrared spectroscopy and hyperspectral imaging combined with artificial intelligence for the detection of cereals quality. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 9766–9796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Das Graças Costa, E.; de Souza, P.M. Introduction to cereals. In Cereal-Based Food Products; Shah, M.A., Sunooj, K.V., Mir, S.A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  4. Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yuan, H.; Song, M.; Zhu, Y.; Cao, W.; Jiang, X.; Ni, J. Non-destructive quality-detection techniques for cereal grains: A systematic review. Agronomy 2022, 12, 3187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Olakanmi, S.J.; Bharathi, V.S.; Jayas, D.S.; Paliwal, J. Innovations in nondestructive assessment of baked products: Current trends and future prospects. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2024, 23, 13385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ng, T.S.; McKinley, G.H.; Ewoldt, R.H. Large amplitude oscillatory shear flow of gluten dough: A model power-law gel. J. Rheol. 2011, 55, 627–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yazar, G.; Duvarci, O.C.; Tavman, S.; Kokini, J.L. Effect of mixing on LAOS properties of hard wheat flour dough. J. Food Eng. 2016, 190, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Erturk, M.Y.; Le, A.N.M.; Kokini, J. Advances in large amplitude oscillatory shear Rheology of food materials. Front. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 3, 1130165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Helmick, H.; Jain, A.; Terashi, G.; Liceaga, A.; Bhunia, A.K.; Kihara, D.; Kokini, J.L. Bioinformatic approaches for characterizing molecular structure and function of food proteins. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 14, 203–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. López-Pedrouso, M.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Alché, J.D.D.; Moreira, R.; Franco, D. Advanced proteomic and bioinformatic tools for predictive analysis of allergens in novel foods. Biology 2023, 12, 714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Van Dalen, G.; Nootenboom, P.; Van Vliet, L.J.; Voortman, L.; Esveld, E. 3-D imaging, analysis and modelling of porous cereal products using X-Ray microtomography. Image Anal. Stereol. 2007, 26, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Besançon, L.; Rondet, E.; Grabulos, J.; Lullien-Pellerin, V.; Lhomond, L.; Cuq, B. Study of the microstructure of durum wheat endosperm using X-Ray micro-computed tomography. J. Cereal Sci. 2020, 96, 103115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ramachandran, R.P.; Erkinbaev, C.; Thakur, S.; Paliwal, J. Three dimensional characterization of micronized soybean seeds using X-Ray microtomography. Food Bioprod. Process. 2021, 127, 388–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Marti, A.; Ragg, E.M.; Pagani, M.A. Effect of processing conditions on water mobility and cooking quality of gluten-free pasta. A Magnetic Resonance Imaging study. Food Chem. 2018, 266, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, W.; Weng, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, P.; Yang, L.; Sheng, Q.; Liu, J. The impact of magnetic field-assisted freeze–thaw treatment on the quality of foxtail millet sourdough and steamed bread. Food Chem. 2024, 450, 139219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Müller, A.; Coradi, P.C.; Nunes, M.T.; Grohs, M.; Bressiani, J.; Teodoro, P.E.; Anschau, K.F.; Flores, E.M.M. Effects of cultivars and fertilization levels on the quality of rice milling: A diagnosis using near-infrared spectroscopy, X-Ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy. Food Res. Int. 2021, 147, 110524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ziegler, D.; Buck, L.; Scherf, K.A.; Popper, L.; Schaum, A.; Hitzmann, B. Improved prediction of wheat baking quality by three novel approaches involving spectroscopic, rheological and analytical measurements and an optimized baking test. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2025, 19, 1673–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Amir, R.M.; Anjum, F.M.; Khan, M.I.; Khan, M.R.; Pasha, I.; Nadeem, M. Application of Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy for the identification of wheat varieties. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 50, 1018–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rouf, T.B.; Díaz-Amaya, S.; Stanciu, L.; Kokini, J. Application of corn zein as an anchoring molecule in a carbon nanotube enhanced electrochemical sensor for the detection of gliadin. Food Control 2020, 117, 107350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lin, H.; Bean, S.R.; Tilley, M.; Peiris, K.H.S.; Brabec, D. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of sorghum grain composition including protein and tannins using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Food Anal. Methods 2021, 14, 268–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Turksoy, S.; Erturk, M.Y.; Kokini, J. Behavior of semolina, hard, soft wheat flour dough at different aging times and temperatures through LAOS properties and molecular interactions of proteins. J. Food Eng. 2021, 301, 110549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kniese, J.; Race, A.M.; Schmidt, H. Classification of cereal flour species using Raman spectroscopy in combination with spectra quality control and multivariate statistical analysis. J. Cereal Sci. 2021, 101, 103299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nagel-Held, J.; Kaiser, L.; Longin, C.F.H.; Hitzmann, B. Prediction of wheat quality parameters combining Raman, fluorescence, and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Cereal Chem. 2022, 99, 830–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Salimi Khorshidi, A.; Storsley, J.; Malunga, L.N.; Thandapilly, S.J.; Ames, N. Advancing the science of wheat quality evaluation using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and ultrasound-based techniques. Cereal Chem. 2018, 95, 347–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Leys, S.; De Bondt, Y.; Bosmans, G.; Courtin, C.M. Assessing the impact of xylanase activity on the water distribution in wheat dough: A 1H NMR study. Food Chem. 2020, 325, 126828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Riley, I.M.; Nivelle, M.A.; Ooms, N.; Delcour, J.A. The use of time domain 1H NMR to study proton dynamics in starch-rich foods: A review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2022, 21, 4738–4775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, L.; Noort, M.; van Bommel, K. Towards the creation of personalized bakery products using 3D food printing. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2022, 99, 1–35. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lisovska, T.; Harasym, J. 3D printing progress in gluten-free food—Clustering analysis of advantages and obstacles. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 12362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, C.; Chen, G.; Zheng, D.; Yin, J.; Cui, C.; Lu, H. Analysis of Heat and Moisture Transfer and Fungi-Induced Hot Spots in Maize Bulk with Different Broken Kernel Contents. Agriculture 2025, 15, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, Z.; Wassgren, C.; Ambrose, K. A review of grain kernel damage: Mechanisms, modeling, and testing procedures. Trans. ASABE 2020, 63, 455–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fan, C.; Wang, W.; Cui, T.; Liu, Y.; Qiao, M. Maize kernel broken rate prediction using machine vision and machine learning algorithms. Foods 2024, 13, 4044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Espinoza-Herrera, J.; Martínez, L.M.; Serna-Saldívar, S.O.; Chuck-Hernández, C. Methods for the modification and evaluation of cereal proteins for the substitution of wheat gluten in dough systems. Foods 2021, 10, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yazar, G.; Duvarci, O.; Tavman, S.; Kokini, J.L. Non-linear rheological behavior of gluten-free flour doughs and correlations of LAOS parameters with gluten-free bread properties. J. Cereal Sci. 2017, 74, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Uthayakumaran, S.; Newberry, M.; Keentok, M.; Stoddard, F.L.; Bekes, F. Basic rheology of bread dough with modified protein content and glutenin-to-gliadin ratios. Cereal Chem. 2000, 77, 744–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fan, C.; Liu, Y.; Cui, T.; Qiao, M.; Yu, Y.; Xie, W.; Huang, Y. Quantitative prediction of protein content in corn kernel based on near-infrared spectroscopy. Foods 2024, 13, 4173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mefleh, M.; Motzo, R.; Boukid, F.; Giunta, F. Clipping effect on the grain nitrogen and protein fractions of ancient and old wheats grown in a mediterranean environment. Foods 2023, 12, 2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dobraszczyk, B.J.; Morgenstern, M.P. Rheology and the breadmaking process. J. Cereal Sci. 2003, 38, 229–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yazar, G. Wheat flour quality assessment by fundamental non-linear rheological methods: A critical review. Foods 2023, 12, 3353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shewry, P.R.; Prins, A.; Kosik, O.; Lovegrove, A. Challenges to increasing dietary fiber in white flour and bread. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 13513–13522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sempio, R.; Segura Godoy, C.; Nyhan, L.; Sahin, A.W.; Zannini, E.; Walter, J.; Arendt, E.K. Closing the fibre gap—The impact of combination of soluble and insoluble dietary fibre on bread quality and health benefits. Foods 2024, 13, 1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liceaga, A.M.; Aguilar-Toalá, J.E.; Vallejo-Cordoba, B.; González-Córdova, A.F.; Hernández-Mendoza, A. Insects as an alternative protein source. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 13, 19–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lisboa, H.M.; Nascimento, A.; Arruda, A.; Sarinho, A.; Lima, J.; Batista, L.; Dantas, M.F.; Andrade, R. Unlocking the Potential of Insect-Based Proteins: Sustainable Solutions for Global Food Security and Nutrition. Foods 2024, 13, 1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Herdeiro, F.M.; Carvalho, M.O.; Nunes, M.C.; Raymundo, A. Development of healthy snacks incorporating meal from Tenebrio molitor and Alphitobius diaperinus using 3D printing technology. Foods 2024, 13, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yazar, G.; Kokini, J.L. Recent Advances in the Assessment of Cereal and Cereal-Based Product Quality. Foods 2025, 14, 1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14071220

AMA Style

Yazar G, Kokini JL. Recent Advances in the Assessment of Cereal and Cereal-Based Product Quality. Foods. 2025; 14(7):1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14071220

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yazar, Gamze, and Jozef L. Kokini. 2025. "Recent Advances in the Assessment of Cereal and Cereal-Based Product Quality" Foods 14, no. 7: 1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14071220

APA Style

Yazar, G., & Kokini, J. L. (2025). Recent Advances in the Assessment of Cereal and Cereal-Based Product Quality. Foods, 14(7), 1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14071220

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop