Next Article in Journal
Effect of Environmentally Friendly Betalain Extraction Methods on Antioxidant Compounds of Tunisian Opuntia stricta Fruit
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Freeze Drying and Spray Drying on the Physical and Chemical Properties of Powders from Cistus creticus L. Extract
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Gamma-Oryzanol Nanoemulsions Fabricated by Different High Energy Techniques
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preparation, Characterization, and Safety Evaluation of a Submicron Emulsion Processed Using High-Pressure Homogenization to Protect Bitter Melon Seed Oil

1
National R&D Center for Se-Rich Agricultural Products Processing, School of Modern Industry for Selenium Science and Engineering, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China
2
Department of Pharmacy, Wuhan No. 1 Hospital (Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Wuhan), Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430023, China
3
Key Laboratory for Deep Processing of Major Grain and Oil, Ministry of Education, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China
4
Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan No. 1 Hospital (Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Wuhan), Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430023, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Current address: COFO Oil and Fats (Chengdu) Co., Ltd., Chengdu 611400, China.
§
Current address: Songzi Public Inspection and Testing Center, Songzi 434200, China.
Foods 2025, 14(5), 850; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14050850
Submission received: 27 January 2025 / Revised: 23 February 2025 / Accepted: 27 February 2025 / Published: 1 March 2025

Abstract

:
Bitter melon seed oil (BMSO), as a by-product of bitter gourd fruit processing, is rich in active ingredients and has unique medicinal potential. However, its solubility and dispersibility in water are poor when used directly. Therefore, this study aims to develop an eco-friendly submicron emulsion containing BMSO for intravenous injection and evaluate its safety. The BMSO submicron emulsion (BMSOSE) was prepared by high-pressure homogenization. The size, polydispersity index (PDI), ζ-potential, Turbiscan stability index (TSI), apparent viscosity, and morphology were characterized; in addition, an in vitro hemolysis test and acute toxicity test in mice were investigated in detail to evaluate the emulsion. The results demonstrated that the formulation and technological parameters of the BMSOSE were as follows: BMSO, 8% (w/w); egg yolk lecithin, 1.2% (w/w); F-68, 0.2% (w/w); pH, 5.0; homogenization pressure, 600 Pa; and number of homogenization cycle, 9. The obtained BMSOSE droplets exhibited a spherical shape with uniform size distribution with an average diameter of 221.3 nm, a PDI of 0.2, and a ζ-potential of −36 mV. There was no significant change in the fatty acid composition of BMSO and the BMSOSE. The safety tests demonstrated that the BMSOSE had no signs of hemolysis and had no toxicity to mice with LD50 > 64 mL/kg. This study provides a foundation for further development of BMSO and its preparations.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Bitter melon, a member of the Cucurbitaceae family and commonly known as bitter gourd or karela, thrives in humid and subtropical regions worldwide [1]. It is consumed as a vegetable in China and other Asian countries [2]. Various parts of this plant have been recognized for their medicinal properties [3,4]. Bitter melon seeds are rich in proteins, fatty acids, agglutinin, flavonoids, lycopene, and other active ingredients, which have significant antioxidative, antiviral, antibacterial, and antitumor effects [5,6,7]. With the advances in research on bitter melon, more studies have revealed that bitter melon seed oil (BMSO) contains a large amount of unsaturated fatty acids. It is worth noting that BMSO contains relevant amounts of the conjugated fatty acid α-eleostearic acid (C18:3 9c11t13t), a positional and geometric isomer of α-linolenic acid, which has been demonstrated to have multiple beneficial effects, such as antioxidant, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, anti-obesity, anti-diabetic, and anti-atherosclerotic effects [2,8,9,10,11]. Therefore, the development and utilization of BMSO have attracted increasing attention. However, α-eleostearic acid in BMSO is easily oxidized and isomerized under the catalysis of light and trace metals. The inherent instability coupled with its strong unpleasant flavor and taste significantly hinder the widespread application of BMSO. Therefore, it is imperative to explore novel strategies for stabilizing BMSO.
A submicron emulsion (SE) is formed by dispersing emulsion drops ranging from 0.1 to 1 μm in size into another liquid. Since the size of SE drops is between emulsion and microemulsion, the oil is wrapped in tiny emulsion particles through emulsification, which enables them to avoid the influence of the surrounding environment on the drug. Moreover, the emulsion has a certain passive targeting effect due to its small droplet size and can improve the stability of fatty acids, protecting them from oxidation, reducing the probability of drug decomposition and deterioration, blood vessel irritation, and adverse reactions of solventizing [12,13]. Ma et al. [14] found that the SE delivery system improved the hydrophilicity and lipophilicity of ursodeoxycholic acid (UA), increased the speed and degree of drug dissolution in the intestine, and significantly enhanced the bioavailability of UA in rats treated with an oral UA submicron emulsion compared to those treated with crude UA.
Furthermore, in recent studies, intravenous emulsions are widely used for lipid soluble substances, such as paclitaxel and vitamins. Through intravenous administration, the active substance can quickly enter the blood circulation, achieving sustained and controlled release of bioactive substances; reduce the adverse effects of traditional dosage forms; decrease vascular stimulation and inflammatory response; and exhibit certain passive targeting [15,16,17,18]. Moreover, as an efficient nutritional supplement, injectable emulsions are commonly used to enhance specific nutrients in food, such as vitamins and minerals, and for special medical purposes, such as providing nutritional support for postoperative recovery and malnourished patients, such as fat emulsions. And in the field of sports, BCAA injection emulsion is used by athletes for rapid muscle recovery. It is also used in intestinal health, such as for the delivery of probiotics. However, the options for emulsifiers in intravenous injection are limited, with pluronic F68, soya lecithin, and egg yolk lecithin being common choices.
At present, many studies focus on the extraction methods and physiological activity of bitter melon seed oil, but there is a lack of research on the application of BMSO. Given the biological activity of BMSO and the advantages of submicron emulsion, we investigated the preparation, characterization, and safety evaluation of a BMSOSE to provide the experimental reference and basis for developing BMSO-based products.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

BMSO was obtained from Deyang Sun Create Technology Co., Ltd., Deyang, China; it is produced by a supercritical CO2 extraction process. Glycerin was purchased from Hunan Erkang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Changsha, China. Egg yolk lecithin was purchased from Nanjing Will Pharmaceutical Industry, Nanjing, China, while sodium oleate was purchased from Aweitao Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China; Pluronic F68 was procured from Jiangsu Bomeida Life Science Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China; water for injection was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (China) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China; Hydrochloric acid (AR), eosin Y (water-soluble) (AR), xylene (AR), neutral gum, and embedded paraffin wax were obtained from the Sinopharm group. Sterile defibrillated sheep blood (BR) was purchased from Nanjing Ason Biotechnology, Nanjing, China. Paraformaldehyde (4%; AR) was procured from Biosharp Biological Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. Normal (0.9%) saline was purchased from Wuhan Binhu Double Crane Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China. Hematoxylin was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai) Trading Co., Ltd, Shanghai. Creatinine (CRE) determination kit (BR), glutamic-oxalacetic transaminase (AST/GOT) test box (BR), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT/GPT) test box (BR) were purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Institute of Biological Engineering, Nanjing, China. Sterile defibrinated sheep blood was purchased from Beijing Solarbio science & technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.

2.2. Animals

ICR mice were SPF grade, 4 weeks old, and weighed 20.0 g ± 2.0 g; a total of 50 mice were purchased from the Experimental Animal Center of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Wuhan) (the license number of laboratory animal production: SCXK (Jing) 2019-0010).
ICR mice were housed in a specific pathogen-free laboratory, Experimental Animal Center of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Laboratory Animal License number: SYXK (E) 2021-0057], at a temperature of 21–25 °C and a relative humidity of 45.0–55.0%. The mice were allowed to adapt to the environment for at least one week before the experiments. The performance standards of the experiments were in accordance with the Regulations on the Management of Experimental Animals (Order No. 2 of the National Science and Technology Commission of China, revised 2017). Furthermore, the European Community guidelines (EEC Directive of 1986: 86/609/EEC) were implemented on all the procedures and animal care. All experimental procedures involving animals were approved by the Ethics Committee of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Wuhan, China).

2.3. Preparation of the BMSOSE

A specific amount of BMSO, egg yolk lecithin, pluronic F68, and glycerin was dispersed in an appropriate amount of water for injection to form the aqueous phase, and BMSO was the oil phase. The two phases were preheated to 70 °C, respectively; the oil phase was slowly added to the water phase and placed in a high-speed shear mixer (Ultra-Turrax, model T18, IKA, Werke, Germany) at 10,000 r/min for 5 min. The pH was adjusted, and it was then added to a high-pressure homogenizer (model AH-2010, ATS Industrial Systems Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), homogenized several times under a certain pressure, and then filtered and sterilized with a 0.22 μm microporous membrane. Finally, the obtained lotion (i.e., BMSOSE) was injected into an ampoule of 25 mL, and then the ampoule bottle was fused and sealed.
Through a single-factor experiment, the addition amounts of BMSO (4–12%), egg yolk lecithin (0.6–1.5%), and pluronic F68 (0–0.4%); the pH of the emulsion (4–9); and the high-pressure homogenization times (3–13) in the preparation process of the BMSOSE were optimized.

2.4. Characterization of BMSOSE

The size, polydispersity index (PDI), and ζ-potential were measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS) using a Zetasizer Nano-ZS (Zetasizer Nano ZS 90, Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK).
Immediately after the BMSOSE formation, measurements were taken at 25 °C with an equilibrium time of 60 s. Before size analysis, the emulsion was diluted with ultrapure water at a dilution factor of 1:100 (sample-to-water) to avoid multiple scattering effects. The measurements were carried out in triplicate. Values of 1.45 and 0.001 were used for the refractive and absorption indexes of BMSO, respectively. The refractive index and dielectric constant of the water dispersant were set at 1.33 and 78.5, respectively.
The Turbiscan stability index (TSI) was measured using the Turbiscan Lab Expert (Formulation, Toulouse, France). Twenty milliliters of emulsion were placed in special Turbiscan sample bottles that were scanned at 25 °C every 1 min for 10 min, and then once every 5 min for 50 min, during which the TSI changes in the emulsion were observed.

2.5. Apparent Viscosity

The apparent viscosity of the BMSOSE was determined using the TA rheometer (Discovery DHR-2 rheometer, TA instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). The BMSOSE (~1.5 mL) was placed on the plate, and the flow temperature slope mode was selected. Flow scanning mode was selected, and the measurement parameters were as follows: the shear rate ranged from 1 to 100 s−1, and the temperature was set at 25 °C [19].

2.6. Morphology Observation

The morphology of the BMSOSE was observed using a transmission electron microscope (TEM) (model JEM-2100, JEOL, Akishima, Japan). The SE of BMSO was treated using the negative dyeing method. After diluting 100 times, 1% phosphotungstic acid was used to negate the emulsion. After dyeing, a drop of BMSO was placed on the copper net in the TEM and dried at 25 °C, and images were captured about 15–20 min later under the TEM.

2.7. Fatty Acid Composition Determination

De-emulsion: Take 10 mL of the BMSOSE, add 1.0 g of anhydrous sodium sulfate, shake appropriately and mix well, place it in a beaker with 70 °C water for ultrasonic for 20 min, and then centrifuge at 6000 r/min for 20 min. The water phase and oil phase should be able to separate.
Fatty acid methylation: About 0.3 g of BMSO was added to 8 mL of 2% potassium hydroxide–methanol solution. The resulting solution was refluxed in a water bath at 80 °C ± 1 °C until the oil droplets disappeared. Seven milliliters of methanol solution containing 15% boron trifluoride was added to the refluxing solution, and the reflux was continued for 2 min in a water bath at 80 °C ± 1 °C. Next, the reaction was terminated, and the refluxing solution was cooled to room temperature.
To a flask, 6 mL of n-hexane was added, and then the solution was shaken for 2 min. Two milliliters of saturated sodium chloride aqueous solution was added to the above solution and allowed to stand for stratification. The upper n-hexane extract was separated, and 3 g of anhydrous sodium sulfate was added. After 1 min of shaking, the solution was left standing for 5 min. The upper solution was separated into the injection flask for determination.
Methyl esterification of the α-eleostearic acid standard was prepared using the same procedure as above.
The experimental conditions of the GC–MS system were as follows: Gas chromatographic column was HP-88, 100 m × 0.25 mm × 0.20 μm; carrier gas was 99.999% high-purity nitrogen in a constant current mode; the column flow rate was 1 mL/min; the injection volume was 1 μL without diversion; and the temperature of the injector was 250 °C. The temperature was set at 150 °C at 0 min, then programmed to 190 °C for 5 min at 4 °C/min, and raised to 230 °C at a rate of 2 °C/min for 10 min. The mass spectrum conditions were as follows: Ionization mode EI+, emission current of 200 VA; electron energy of 70 eV; interface temperature of 250 °C; ion source temperature of 200 °C; and the detection voltage was 350 V. The mass spectrometry library was NIST11.L.

2.8. Safety Verification of the BMSOSE

2.8.1. Hemolysis Test In Vitro

Preparation of 2% erythrocyte suspension [20]: The sterile defibrinated sheep blood was taken, and 50 mL of normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride solution) was added, mixed well, and then centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant was removed, and the precipitated red blood cells were washed thrice with normal saline until the supernatant became clear and had no red color. The obtained red blood cell solution was combined (2 mL) and diluted with normal saline (100 mL) to prepare a 2% suspension.
Hemolysis test: Five clean glass (10 mL) test tubes were numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, and the procedure was carried out according to the experimental design detailed in Table 1. Tube No. 1 and 2 contained the test solutions, and No. 3, 4, and 5 were the negative, positive, and blank control solutions, respectively. After the preparation of the individual solutions, each tube was gently mixed and incubated in a water bath at 37 °C. After 6 h, hemolysis in each tube was observed and recorded according to the judgment criteria shown in Table 2.

2.8.2. Acute Toxicity Test

A total of 50 SPF ICR mice, aged 4 weeks and weighing 20 ± 2 g, were used for the acute toxicity tests. After adaptive feeding for one week, the mice were randomly divided into five groups, normal, low dose, low to medium dose, medium to high dose, and high dose, with 10 mice in each group (5 males and 5 females). Before the experiment, the mice underwent fasting for 12 h. The normal group was intraperitoneal injected (i.p.) with saline solution; the injection dose was 64 mL/kg BW. The low dose, low to medium dose, medium to high dose, and high dose groups of mice were i.p. with the prepared BMSOSE, with injection doses of 8, 16, 32, and 64 mL/kg, respectively. All the doses were divided equally into three injections. The interval between two injections was 6 h, and the stress response of the mice was observed regularly in the first 24 h after injection to check for signs of tremor, convulsion, diarrhea, drowsiness, coma, and other symptoms, and timely measures were taken, and their reasons were analyzed. The body weight of the mice was recorded for 15 days.
On the 15th day of the experiment, all the tested animals were weighed, and their weights were recorded. Next, their eyeballs were harvested, and blood was collected from the mice. Mice were dissected after humane euthanasia. After the blood was placed at 4 °C for 4 h, the supernatant was extracted by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The expression of GPT, GOT, and CR was detected using a microplate analyzer (Meiguo Molecular Instruments Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). After dissection, the heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney were collected, and the anatomical findings were recorded in detail. After removing excess adipose tissue, all other tissues and organs were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, sectioned, and stained. The pathological changes in the sections of the organs of the mice were observed under a light microscope (BX53 biological microscope, Olympus Corporation, Shinjuku, Japan) [21].

2.9. Statistical Analysis

All results were subjected to an analysis of variance using the SPSS statistical package (ver. 23, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Significant differences between mean values (p < 0.05) were determined using LSD and Tukey’s test. The results were reported as the means ± standard deviation.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Influence of BMSO Concentration on the BMSOSE

The mean diameter, PDI, ζ-potential, and TSI measurements of the SE containing different BMSO concentrations (4–12% (w/v)) are shown in Figure 1.
It was observed that, with an increase in BMSO concentration, the mean diameter and PDI of the emulsion decreased initially and then increased, but the ζ-potential continued to decrease. When the concentration of BMSO was 8%, the emulsion exhibited a more uniform particle size distribution and a more stable TSI than when the BMSO concentration was 4%. This phenomenon was probably due to the higher oil loading, resulting in more and smaller homogenized droplets. This, in turn, provided the emulsifier with a larger adsorbable surface, making the interfacial film surrounding the oil droplets more stable and the coalescence force stronger [22]. However, when the BMSO concentration increased to 12%, larger particle sizes were formed, indicating that the emulsifier could not completely embed the excessive oil phase. This resulted in particle agglomerations as well as adversely affected the particle size and stability of the emulsion. Therefore, an SE containing 8% (w/v) BMSO was selected for subsequent analyses.

3.2. Influence of Emulsifier Concentration on the BMSOSE

The mean diameter, PDI, ζ-potential, and TSI measurements of the SE containing different concentrations of egg yolk lecithin (0.6–1.5% (w/v)) and F-68 (0–0.4% (w/v)) are shown in Figure 2.
Lecithin promotes overall solubility by burying the hydrophobic amino acids or exposing more charges, thereby increasing the emulsifying ability [23]. Egg yolk lecithin has a similar structure to animal cell membranes and has been widely used in emulsion preparation. An emulsion with a droplet size of 308 nm was obtained at an egg yolk lecithin concentration of 1.2% (w/v); the ζ-potential was −46.17 mV, and the PDI was 0.283. These results indicated that the emulsion containing a low concentration of egg yolk lecithin could not fully emulsify BMSO and showed an uneven distribution on the oil–water interface of the emulsion to form a solid and compact emulsifier interface film. When the content of lecithin was >1.2% (w/v), the relative balance among the droplets was destroyed with the increase in emulsifier content, and the egg yolk lecithin not adsorbed to the water–oil interface was dispersed into the continuous phase, causing droplet flocculation. Therefore, a concentration of 1.2% (w/v) egg yolk lecithin was selected for subsequent analysis.
An emulsifier interface film formed with lecithin is not sufficiently stable. It is difficult to form a stable emulsion with a single emulsifier, but it can be combined with phospholipids. The commonly used emulsifiers include tween and poloxamer; however, tween is potentially unsafe, hemolytic, and allergenic [24]. As shown in Figure 2, upon the addition of F-68, a nonsignificant trend in change was observed in the average droplet size of the emulsion, and the ζ-potential decreased slightly. The PDI reached the minimum when the F-68 mass fraction was 0.2%, and the emulsion stability was slightly improved. Except for 0.1%, the grain size distribution of the emulsion was unimodal, and the distribution was narrow. The growth trend of all TSI began to slow down after 10 min and was gradually stable with increasing time. Therefore, after a comprehensive consideration, the mass fraction of F-68 was selected as 0.2%, the average particle size of the emulsion was 321.50 nm, the ζ-potential was −39.93 mV, and the PDI was 0.273. Therefore, the optimal emulsifier concentration was as follows: the yolk lecithin content was 1.2%, and the F-68 content was 0.2%.

3.3. Influence of pH on the BMSOSE

Since high-pressure homogenization and the sterilization process can affect the pH stability of the emulsion and human tolerance to intravenous injections ranges from pH 4 to 11 [25], this study explored the influence of pH in the range of 4–9 on the submicron emulsion of BMSO. According to the optimal preparation conditions, the initial pH value of the emulsion was 4.34. As shown in Figure 3, when the pH was adjusted to 4, the average droplet size and PDI of the emulsion increased significantly (p < 0.05), the droplet size distribution was uneven, and TSI continued to increase. When the pH was between 5 and 9, the average droplet size, ζ-potential, and PDI showed a trend of an initial decrease and subsequent increase. The droplet size distribution was the most uniform, and the TSI growth trend was the slowest. The pH reflects the concentration of H+ ions in the system; as the H+ ions gradually increase, excess H+ ions penetrate the adsorption layer of the emulsion particles to neutralize the negative charge carried on the surface of the particles. Therefore, the amount of charge carried by the particles gradually decreases, and the emulsion flocculates with the increase in particle size. Therefore, we chose to adjust the pH to 5. The average droplet size of the emulsion was 229.40 nm, and the ζ-potential was −27.13 mV, while the PDI was 0.167.

3.4. Influence of Homogenization Time on the BMSOSE

Figure 4 shows the mean diameter, ζ-potential, PDI, and TSI of the BMSOSE under different homogenization passes. High-pressure homogenization can improve the physical and microbiological stability of the emulsion system [26]. Preliminary results showed that homogenization at 600 bar produced emulsions with fine droplet sizes and low PDI values. Furthermore, the TSI and ζ-potential also showed relatively stable emulsions at nine homogenization passes. Appropriate pressure and several passes of homogenization can produce smaller particle sizes and more stable emulsions. When the homogenization pressure and the number of homogenizations are high, the kinetic energy of the droplets increases, and the collision accelerates, leading to the merger of particles to a certain extent; that is, the particle size of the emulsion does not decrease. Excessive energy input makes the emulsion system overload, which reduces the stability of the emulsion [14].
Therefore, a homogenization pressure of 600 bar and nine homogenization passes were the chosen parameters in this study. Under these conditions, the mean size of the emulsion was 225 nm, the ζ-potential was −36 mV, and the PDI was 0.196.

3.5. Physical Properties of the BMSOSE

Under optimal conditions (i.e., 8% (w/v) BMSO, 1.2% (w/v) egg yolk lecithin, 0.2% (w/v) F-68 content, pH 5.0, homogenization pressure of 600 bar, and nine homogenization passes), the obtained BMSOSE was characterized as mean diameter, PDI, ζ-potential, viscosity, and microstructural diagram (Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7). The mean diameter of the emulsion droplet was about 221 nm, with a stable PDI around 0.201 and a ζ-potential of −35.9 mV. The emulsion particle size distribution was uniform, while the appearance was a milky-white emulsion liquid with good fluidity, with no oil and wall hanging phenomenon.
The rheological properties are used as a quality control tool for fat emulsion. The viscosity change curve of the emulsion system is used to characterize the polymerization degree of emulsion to some extent and further reflect its dynamic stability. The rheological properties of a fat emulsion depend on many factors, such as the type of emulsifier and oil phase, the proportion of continuous phase to dispersed phase, and particle size and distribution [27]. Figure 6 shows that the viscosity of the emulsion decreased sharply with increasing shear rate, indicating that the emulsion was a non-Newtonian fluid. When the emulsion has a larger viscosity, it is beneficial to slow down the floating speed of the droplet and maintain better stability.
As illustrated in Figure 7, the droplets of the BMSOSE were spherical, and the average particle size of the emulsion was small. Although there were still a few small droplets, most SE droplets were uniform in size and shape.

3.6. Fatty Acid Composition of the BMSOSE

As seen in Table 3, the fatty acid composition of BMSO changed after emulsification. For example, the contents of oleic acid, linoleic acid, and α-eleostearic acid decreased slightly. This may be due to the oxidation loss of these substances in the emulsion caused by homogenization under high pressure. However, in general, a more stable emulsion system can be formed as an SE after the high-pressure homogenization of BMSO, in which the functional components can be quickly and stably emulsified in the nanosystem, and the loss of BMSO in the process of production, processing, transportation, and storage can be reduced.

3.7. Hemolysis Testing of the BMSOSE

The composition of an SE preparation is complex. The unsaturated bond of the lecithin molecule is easily oxidized to form the structure of the diene bond, leading to hemolysis toxicity [28]. Therefore, it is necessary to test the hemolysis of the BMSOSE. As seen in Figure 8, all the red blood cells were sinking, and stratification was clear in samples No. 1 and 2. The bottom red blood cells were dispersed again after gently shaking three times, indicating no red blood cell agglutination.
There was no apparent red color in the upper layer, and no significant difference was observed compared with the liquid phase of sample No. 3 (negative control). Sample No. 4, the positive control group, exhibited noticeable RBC rupture and a clear red solution, which was significantly different from the solution of samples No. 1–3. Therefore, it can be concluded that there is no hemolysis in the BMSOSE, ensuring its safety.

3.8. Acute Toxicity of the BMSOSE

As seen in Figure 9, the body weight of the mice in both the male and female groups increased normally during the experiment. On the 1st day after administration, the body weight of the mice in each group slightly increased, which might be caused by the retaliatory diet eating of mice after fasting. The trend of weight changes then gradually leveled off, consistent with the normal control group. The body weight of the mice showed no significant differences between the experimental groups and the normal control group (p > 0.05).
The organ indexes of the mice in each group are shown in Table 4. Among them, the renal index of the male mice in the low-dose group was significantly increased compared with the normal control group (p < 0.05). However, whether the BMSOSE can prove damaging to the kidneys of mice still needs further investigation.
The pathological changes in the mouse organs can be observed in Figure 10 and Figure 11. Upon dissection, the organs of all mice had a normal color and were soft and fleshy, and suspicious lesions could not be directly observed. The results showed no significant difference between the control group and the experimental mice, except for sporadic and slight inflammatory infiltration in the liver and kidney of some animals in the individual dose groups, which resulted from spontaneous lesions. Therefore, the BMSOSE had no adverse effects on the development and growth of the organs in both the male and female mice.
The liver is the most important multi-functional organ in the digestive system, participating in the body’s secretion, excretion, transformation, and other functions. GPT and GOT, two critical metabolic enzymes for liver function, catalyze the amino transfer between amino acids and keto-acids. Their levels are important indexes to assess liver function damage. CR, a nitrogen-containing compound condensed by the removal of a molecule of water from creatine, is eliminated from the body by the kidney. Therefore, CR can be used as an important indicator to evaluate the glomerular filtration rate and renal function. Thus, the levels of GPT, GOT, and CR in the mice were detected. As shown in Table 5, compared with the normal control group, the indicators of the mice in each dose group injected with the BMSOSE fluctuated slightly, but all were within the normal range. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences, suggesting that the BMSOSE did not cause damage to the liver and kidney of the mice. These results imply the safety of the BMSOSE at the tested doses.

4. Conclusions

The present study successfully explored the feasibility of processing a submicron emulsion (BMSOSE) using high-pressure homogenization, containing BMSO as the oil phase and egg yolk lecithin, pluronic F68, and glycerin as the emulsifier. The optimal BMSOSE contained 8% of BMSO, 1.2% of egg yolk lecithin, and 0.2% of F-68 homogenized at 600 bar and for nine cycles since it was characterized by a small spherical droplet (221.3 nm) associated with low viscosity and good fluidity. In addition, there was no significant change in the fatty acid composition of BMSO and the BMSOSE. The obtained BMSOSE showed no signs of hemolysis and toxic effects (up to an LD50 > 64 mL/kg). Overall, this SE could help incorporate and protect BSMO in the pharmaceutical, food, or cosmetics industries.
The hemolysis test showed that there was no hemolysis in the BMSOSE. The acute toxicity examination showed that the mice grew well after intraperitoneal injection of different doses of the BMSOSE. The hair of the mice was white and glossy, the appearance of the mice was no different from that of the control group, and there was no mouse casualty. After feeding for 14 days, the mice were dissected. The organs of all mice were normal in color and soft. No suspicious lesions were observed by eye observation. Compared with the normal control group, for each dose group of the mice, body weight, viscera index (heart than body, liver volume ratio, spleen volume ratio, kidney volume ratio), and serum related indicators (GPT, GOT, CR) showed no significant difference with the control group, except that the liver and kidney of individual animals in the individual dose groups appeared sporadic with slight pathological changes. Therefore, we have concluded that, under the condition of the current dose, the BMSOSE did not cause mice toxicity, and the actual non-toxic level has reached with an LD50 > 64 mL/kg. In conclusion, the BMSOSE prepared in this experiment has good stability, safety, and non-toxicity. This conclusion has a certain degree of mutual confirmation with the research results of Chung et al. [29], who found that the bitter gourd seed extract of scCO2 is >2000 mg/kg, which can be regarded as an almost non-toxic substance. It is crucial to note that this study, based on the practical application of bitter melon seeds, investigates the safety of the BMSOSE and offers scientific evidence for its safety evaluation in novel food assessment.
This study explores the formulation, preparation process, and safety of the BMSOSE from a practical application perspective. The development of the BMSOSE has significant potential impact in the food industry, as the BMSO is rich in CLnA, VE, polyphenols, and other beneficial ingredients for health and can be used in the development of functional foods tailored to specific health needs, such as products that regulate blood sugar and improve metabolic syndrome. The BMSOSE can also serve as a potential functional food or as an injectable emulsion for nutritional supplements. From the perspective of nutritional supplements, a BMSO injection emulsion can bypass the degradation of the digestive system and directly enter the blood circulation, which may become an efficient nutritional supplement. As a medical food, a BMSO injection emulsion may provide nutritional support for patients who cannot obtain sufficient nutrients orally. In the field of sports nutrition, the fatty acid components in BMSO may provide athletes with rapid energy supplementation and recovery, and due to the anti-inflammatory effect of BMSO, it may help alleviate muscle inflammation and injury in athletes after exercise.
However, the BMSOSE physiological activity and mechanism require further detailed research. Additionally, there is still a long way to go before the practical application of a BMSO injection emulsion. Regulatory policies for injectable emulsions vary across different countries and regions, necessitating compliance considerations based on the application location. Currently, some consumers prefer oral emulsions over injection methods. The preparation of injectable emulsions demands sterility and safety, posing challenges to production. Nevertheless, the application of injectable emulsions in the fields of food and nutritional supplements is gradually expanding, particularly in medical and sports nutrition supplements, where they exhibit significant potential. In the future, with technological advancements and changes in the consumer market, injectable emulsions are expected to be widely used in more fields. This study provided a novel idea for the development and utilization of BMSO and the utilization of natural CLnA resources, which has important practical significance in the application of seed oil.

Author Contributions

Data curation and writing—original draft preparation, H.W.; writing—review and editing, H.G.; methodology and validation, X.S.; formal analysis, Y.M.; investigation and software, R.Z. and M.W.; conceptualization and funding acquisition, J.H.; project administration and supervision, J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the project of Study of Preparation and Evaluation Technique of Bitter Melon Seed CLNA Oil Multilayer Emulsion (No. whpu-2021-kj-259). Also, it was supported by the project of the Key Technique of Green Extraction and Separation of Protein Polypeptides from Cucurbitaceae Fruit and Vegetable (No. whpu-2021-kj-260), Hubei Province Fruit and Vegetable Intensive Processing; the Plant Polypeptide Nutritional Functional Food Development Enterprise-University Joint Innovation Center (No. whpu-2020-kj-304); International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Project of Hubei Province (2024EHA015).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Laboratory Animal Center, Huanzhong University of Science and Technology SYXK(E)2021-0057 approved date 23 April 2021.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Huiling Wang was employed by the company COFO Oil and Fats (Chengdu) Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Anjum, F.; Shahid, M.; Bukhari, S.A.; Anwar, S.; Latif, S. Study of Quality Characteristics and Efficacy of Extraction Solvent/Technique on the Antioxidant Activity of Bitter Gourd Seed. J. Food Process. Technol. 2012, 4, 1000205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Braca, A.; Siciliano, T.; D’Arrigo, M.; Germanò, M.P. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Momordica charantia seed essential oil. Fitoterapia 2008, 79, 123–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Białek, A.; Jelińska, M.; Białek, M.; Lepionka, T.; Czerwonka, M.; Czauderna, M. The Effect of Diet Supplementation with Pomegranate and Bitter Melon on Lipidomic Profile of Serum and Cancerous Tissues of Rats with Mammary Tumours. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kilcar, A.Y.; Yildiz, O.; Dogan, T.; Sulu, E.; Takan, G.; Muftuler, F.Z.B. The Effect of Bitter Melon (Momordica charantia) Extract on the Uptake of (99m)Tc Labeled Paclitaxel: In Vitro Monitoring in Breast Cancer Cells. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2020, 20, 1497–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ahmad, Z.; Zamhuri, K.F.; Yaacob, A.; Siong, C.H.; Selvarajah, M.; Ismail, A.; Hakim, M.N. In vitro anti-diabetic activities and chemical analysis of polypeptide-k and oil isolated from seeds of Momordica charantia (bitter gourd). Molecules 2012, 17, 9631–9640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chang, Y.Y.; Su, H.M.; Chen, S.H.; Hsieh, W.T.; Chyuan, J.H.; Chao, P.M. Roles of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor α in Bitter Melon Seed Oil-Corrected Lipid Disorders and Conversion of α-Eleostearic Acid into Rumenic Acid in C57BL/6J Mice. Nutrients 2016, 8, 805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chan, F.K.; Hsu, C.; Li, T.C.; Chen, W.H.; Tseng, K.T.; Chao, P.M. Bitter melon seed oil increases mitochondrial content in gastrocnemius muscle and improves running endurance in sedentary C57BL/6J mice. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2018, 58, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yoshime, L.T.; De Melo, I.L.P.; Sattler, J.A.G.; de Carvalho, E.B.T.; Mancini-Filho, J. Bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) seed oil as a naturally rich source of bioactive compounds for nutraceutical purposes. Nutrire 2016, 41, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, G.C.; Chen, W.H.; Tseng, K.T.; Chao, P.M. The anti-adiposity effect of bitter melon seed oil is solely attributed to its fatty acid components. Lipids Health Dis. 2017, 16, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dhar, P.; Chattopadhyay, K.; Bhattacharyya, D.; Roychoudhury, A.; Biswas, A.; Ghosh, S. Antioxidative effect of conjugated linolenic acid in diabetic and non-diabetic blood: An in vitro study. J. Oleo Sci. 2006, 56, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhuo, R.J.; Wang, F.; Zhang, X.H.; Zhang, J.J.; Xu, J.; Dong, W.; Zou, Z.Q. A-eleostearic acid inhibits growth and induces apoptosis in breast cancer cells via HER2/HER3 signaling. Mol. Med. Rep. 2014, 9, 993–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cao, S.Q.; Zhang, K.Y.; Yan, X.; Ma, Y. Preparation and evaluation of paclitaxel and Brucea javanica oil core-matched nanoemulsions to treat cancer in vitro and in vivo. Chin. Herb. Med. SciVerse Sci. 2018, 10, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, X.; Zhu, W.; Liu, H.; Deng, F.; Wang, W.; Qin, L. Preparation of injectable clopidogrel loaded submicron emulsion for enhancing physicochemical stability and anti-thrombotic efficacy. Int. J. Pharm. 2022, 611, 121323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ma, Y.Q.; Li, G.; Xu, J.H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.Z.; Xiao, H.Y.; Li, X.F. Combination of submicroemulsion and phospholipid complex for novel delivery of ursodeoxycholic acid. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2014, 19, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, J.J.; Sung, K.C.; Hu, O.Y.; Yeh, C.H.; Fang, J.Y. Submicron lipid emulsion as a drug delivery system for nalbuphine and its prodrugs. J. Control. Release 2006, 115, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wen, L. Distribution of 10-Hydroxy Camptothecin in Arterial and Intravenous Plasma of Rats with 2 Kinds of Routes of Administration. China Pharm. 2013, 24, 1176–1179. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang, R.; Wang, B.; Zhao, H.; Wei, C.; Guo, R. Tissue distribution of Curcumol in rats after intravenous injection of zedoary turmeric oil fat emulsion. Asian J. Pharmacodyn. Pharmacokinet. 2009, 9, 51–57. [Google Scholar]
  18. Krista, H.; Braylee, G.; Laura, G.; Paul, E.W. Lipid emulsions in parenteral nutrition: Does it matter? Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 2023, 29, 1070–5295. [Google Scholar]
  19. Plasencia, J.; Inkson, N.; Nydal, O.J. Research on the viscosity of stabilized emulsions in different pipe diameters using pressure drop and phase inversion. Exp. Comput. Multiph. Flow 2021, 4, 241–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Johnson, A.; Woernley, D.; Pressman, D. Sedimentation properties of human and sheep erythrocyte hemolysins. J. Immunol. 1957, 79, 234–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cesário, F.R.; de Albuquerque, T.R.; de Lacerda, G.M.; de Oliveira, M.R.; da Silva, B.A.; Rodrigues, L.B.; Martins, A.O.; da Silva Almeida, J.R.; Vale, M.L.; Coutinho, H.D.; et al. Chemical fingerprint, acute oral toxicity and anti-inflammatory activity of the hydroalcoholic extract of leaves from Tocoyena formosa (Cham. & Schlecht.) K. Schum. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 26, 873–880. [Google Scholar]
  22. Dhaval, M.; Vaghela, P.; Patel, K.; Sojitra, K.; Patel, M.; Patel, S.; Dudhat, K.; Shah, S.; Manek, R.; Parmar, R. Lipid-based emulsion drug delivery systems—A comprehensive review. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2022, 12, 1616–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, J.; Shen, Y.; Zhai, J.; Su, Y.; Gu, L.; Chang, C.; Yang, Y. Enhancing the oxidative stability of algal oil powders stabilized by egg yolk granules/lecithin composites. Food Chem. 2021, 345, 128782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wan, Z.; Xie, F.; Wang, L.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, H. Preparation and Evaluation of Cabazitaxel-Loaded Bovine Serum Albumin Nanoparticles for Prostate Cancer. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 5333–5344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, W. Tolerability of hypertonic injectables. Int. J. Pharm. 2015, 490, 308–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Udomrati, S.; Khalid, N.; Gohtani, S.; Nakajima, M.; Uemura, K.; Kobayashi, I. Formulation and characterization of esterified xylo-oligosaccharides-stabilized oil-in-water emulsions using microchannel emulsification. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2016, 148, 333–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, C.; Wang, J.; Zhu, D.; Hu, S.; Kang, Z.; Ma, H. Effect of dynamic ultra-high pressure homogenization on the structure and functional properties of whey protein. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 1301–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Arinina, M.P.; Zuev, K.V.; Kulichikhin, V.G.; Malkin, A.Y. Effect of Composition and Interfacial Tension on the Rheology and Morphology of Heavy Oil-In-Water Emulsions. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 16460–16469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chung, W.Y.; Jadhav, S.; Hsu, P.K.; Kuan, C.M. Evaluation of acute and sub-chronic toxicity of bitter melon seed extract in Wistar rats. Toxicol. Rep. 2022, 29, 1024–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mean diameter, PDI, and ζ-potential (A) of the BMSOSE with different BMSO concentrations. Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences between the BMSO concentration values (p < 0.05). TSI of the BMSOSE containing different BMSO concentrations (4–12% (w/v)) (B).
Figure 1. Mean diameter, PDI, and ζ-potential (A) of the BMSOSE with different BMSO concentrations. Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences between the BMSO concentration values (p < 0.05). TSI of the BMSOSE containing different BMSO concentrations (4–12% (w/v)) (B).
Foods 14 00850 g001
Figure 2. Mean diameter, ζ-potential, and PDI of the BMSOSE containing different concentrations of egg yolk lecithin (0.6–1.5% (w/v)) (A), and F-68 (0–0.4% (w/v)) (C). TSI of the BMSOSE containing different concentrations of egg yolk lecithin (0.6–1.5% (w/v)) (B) and F-68 (0–0.4% (w/v)) (D). Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences between the BMSO concentration values (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Mean diameter, ζ-potential, and PDI of the BMSOSE containing different concentrations of egg yolk lecithin (0.6–1.5% (w/v)) (A), and F-68 (0–0.4% (w/v)) (C). TSI of the BMSOSE containing different concentrations of egg yolk lecithin (0.6–1.5% (w/v)) (B) and F-68 (0–0.4% (w/v)) (D). Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences between the BMSO concentration values (p < 0.05).
Foods 14 00850 g002
Figure 3. Mean diameter, ζ-potential, and PDI of the BMSOSE with different pH (4–9) (A). TSI of the BMSOSE with different pH (4–9) (B). Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences between the BMSO concentration values (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Mean diameter, ζ-potential, and PDI of the BMSOSE with different pH (4–9) (A). TSI of the BMSOSE with different pH (4–9) (B). Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences between the BMSO concentration values (p < 0.05).
Foods 14 00850 g003
Figure 4. Mean diameter, ζ-potential, and PDI of the BMSOSE prepared with different homogenization passes (3–12) (A). TSI of the BMSOSE prepared with different homogenization passes (3–12) (B). Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences between the number of passes (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Mean diameter, ζ-potential, and PDI of the BMSOSE prepared with different homogenization passes (3–12) (A). TSI of the BMSOSE prepared with different homogenization passes (3–12) (B). Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences between the number of passes (p < 0.05).
Foods 14 00850 g004
Figure 5. Mean diameter, ζ-potential, and PDI of the BMSOSE.
Figure 5. Mean diameter, ζ-potential, and PDI of the BMSOSE.
Foods 14 00850 g005
Figure 6. Steady-shear viscosity of the BMSOSE.
Figure 6. Steady-shear viscosity of the BMSOSE.
Foods 14 00850 g006
Figure 7. TEM image of the BMSOSE. Scale bar:100nm (a); scale bar:200nm (b).
Figure 7. TEM image of the BMSOSE. Scale bar:100nm (a); scale bar:200nm (b).
Foods 14 00850 g007
Figure 8. Hemolysis test results of the BMSOSE. No. 1–2 are the test solutions, No. 3 is the negative control solution, No. 4 is the positive control solution, and No. 5 is the blank control solution.
Figure 8. Hemolysis test results of the BMSOSE. No. 1–2 are the test solutions, No. 3 is the negative control solution, No. 4 is the positive control solution, and No. 5 is the blank control solution.
Foods 14 00850 g008
Figure 9. Changes in mice body weight during acute toxicity test. (A): female, (B): male.
Figure 9. Changes in mice body weight during acute toxicity test. (A): female, (B): male.
Foods 14 00850 g009
Figure 10. Pathological changes in male mouse organs (×200). (A): Normal; (B): Low dose; (C): Low to middle dose; (D): Middle to high dose; (E): High dose.
Figure 10. Pathological changes in male mouse organs (×200). (A): Normal; (B): Low dose; (C): Low to middle dose; (D): Middle to high dose; (E): High dose.
Foods 14 00850 g010
Figure 11. Pathological changes in female mouse organs (×200). (A): Normal; (B): Low dose; (C): Low to middle dose; (D): Middle to high dose; (E): High dose.
Figure 11. Pathological changes in female mouse organs (×200). (A): Normal; (B): Low dose; (C): Low to middle dose; (D): Middle to high dose; (E): High dose.
Foods 14 00850 g011
Table 1. Hemolysis test arrangement.
Table 1. Hemolysis test arrangement.
Tube Number12345
2% red cell suspension (RCS)2.52.52.52.50
0.9% sodium chloride solution/mL2.22.22.504.7
Water/mL0002.50
Bitter melon oil submicron emulsion/mL0.30.3000.3
Table 2. Judgment criteria of hemolysis test.
Table 2. Judgment criteria of hemolysis test.
Determination Criteria for Hemolysis ResultPhenomenon
HemolysisThe solution was clear red, and there was no cell residue at the bottom of the tube.
Part of the hemolysisThe solution was clear red or brown with a small number of cells at the bottom of the tube.
No hemolysisThe red blood cells were sinking, and the upper fluid was clear and colorless.
Erythrocyte aggregationThe red blood cells aggregated and did not disperse after vibration.
Table 3. Fatty acid composition of BMSO and the BMSOSE.
Table 3. Fatty acid composition of BMSO and the BMSOSE.
Fatty Acid CompositionRelative Amount (%)
BMSOBMSO from BMSOSE
C16:0 (Palmitic acid)1.68 ± 0.021.92 ± 0.04
C18:0 (Stearic acid)16.8 ± 0.3617.37 ± 0.57
C18:1 (Oleic acid)4.34 ± 0.044.26 ± 0.03
C18:2 (Linoleic acid)0.44 ± 0.010.42 ± 0.03
C20:0 (Arachidic acid)6.13 ± 0.016.12 ± 0.07
C18:3 (α-eleostearic acid)54.9 ± 0.6051.83 ± 0.04
C18:3 (CLN-B)3.63 ± 0.044.83 ± 0.13
C18:3 (CLN-C)12.08 ± 0.9413.76 ± 0.44
Table 4. Effect of the BMSOSE on organ indexes of mice (g, x ¯ ± s).
Table 4. Effect of the BMSOSE on organ indexes of mice (g, x ¯ ± s).
GenderGroupCardiac Index/%Renal Index/%Liver Index/%Spleen Index/%
FemaleNormal0.53 ± 0.071.33 ± 0.064.18 ± 0.060.38 ± 0.04
Low dose0.60 ± 0.061.25 ± 0.064.18 ± 0.360.41 ± 0.11
Low to middle dose0.53 ± 0.121.33 ± 0.044.75 ± 0.660.40 ± 0.04
Middle to high dose0.58 ± 0.0001.22 ± 0.154.78 ± 0.260.50 ± 0.02
High dose0.62 ± 0.041.35 ± 0.094.34 ± 0.290.38 ± 0.04
MaleNormal0.51 ± 0.050.80 ± 0.23 b4.56 ± 0.190.38 ± 0.08
Low dose0.52 ± 0.061.60 ± 0.16 a4.90 ± 0.290.45 ± 0.06
Low to middle dose0.54 ± 0.110.84 ± 0.12 b4.90 ± 0.470.44 ± 0.07
Middle to high dose0.54 ± 0.110.90 ± 0.08 b4.61 ± 0.170.38 ± 0.05
High dose0.54 ± 0.070.83 ± 0.08 b4.63 ± 0.410.36 ± 0.009
Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences between the number of passes (p < 0.05).
Table 5. Effect of the BMSOSE on serum indexes of mice (g, x ¯ ± s).
Table 5. Effect of the BMSOSE on serum indexes of mice (g, x ¯ ± s).
GenderGroupGPT/(U/L)GOT/(U/L)CR/(μmol/L)
FemaleNormal16.51 ± 4.0722.04 ± 7.0072.99 ± 8.18
Low dose17.76 ± 2.1725.04 ± 4.6080.18 ± 5.20
Low to middle dose14.69 ± 3.0428.67 ± 1.2080.08 ± 12.47
Middle to high dose16.95 ± 3.5022.49 ± 8.3988.75 ± 9.10
High dose13.35 ± 3.5517.57 ± 3.0477.26 ± 7.65
MaleNormal21.36 ± 5.8921.03 ± 4.0674.20 ± 1.84
Low dose20.86 ± 7.0824.99 ± 5.0975.75 ± 4.13
Low to middle dose16.08 ± 1.6731.27 ± 7.7490.92 ± 2.29
Middle to high dose17.82 ± 8.1124.59 ± 3.4980.94 ± 4.99
High dose20.41 ± 1.9920.86 ± 5.1374.71 ± 7.08
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, H.; Guo, H.; Shuai, X.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, R.; Wu, M.; He, J.; Ling, J. Preparation, Characterization, and Safety Evaluation of a Submicron Emulsion Processed Using High-Pressure Homogenization to Protect Bitter Melon Seed Oil. Foods 2025, 14, 850. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14050850

AMA Style

Wang H, Guo H, Shuai X, Ma Y, Zhang R, Wu M, He J, Ling J. Preparation, Characterization, and Safety Evaluation of a Submicron Emulsion Processed Using High-Pressure Homogenization to Protect Bitter Melon Seed Oil. Foods. 2025; 14(5):850. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14050850

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Huiling, Heng Guo, Xiaoyan Shuai, Yan Ma, Rui Zhang, Muci Wu, Jingren He, and Jiayan Ling. 2025. "Preparation, Characterization, and Safety Evaluation of a Submicron Emulsion Processed Using High-Pressure Homogenization to Protect Bitter Melon Seed Oil" Foods 14, no. 5: 850. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14050850

APA Style

Wang, H., Guo, H., Shuai, X., Ma, Y., Zhang, R., Wu, M., He, J., & Ling, J. (2025). Preparation, Characterization, and Safety Evaluation of a Submicron Emulsion Processed Using High-Pressure Homogenization to Protect Bitter Melon Seed Oil. Foods, 14(5), 850. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14050850

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop