Next Article in Journal
Comparative Muscle Quality and Multiomic Analyses in Wild-Type and Yellow-Mutant Triplophysa siluroides: TGF-β/BMP-Mediated Covariation and Breeding for Muscle Quality
Previous Article in Journal
Mashua (Tropaeolum tuberosum Ruiz & Pavón): Nutritional Composition, Bioactive Compounds, and Functional Potential as an Andean Natural Ingredient
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Methodological Approach to LIBS Elemental Analysis and Plasma Characterization of Quinoa and Amaranth Pseudocereals Using a TEA CO2 Laser

by
Dragan Ranković
1,*,
Marjetka Savić
1,
Milovan Stoiljković
1,
Miroslav Ristić
2,
Vyacheslav V. Luchkouski
3,
Neda Đorđević
1 and
Aleksandr N. Chumakov
3
1
VINCA Institute of Nuclear Sciences—National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Mike Alasa 12-14, 11001 Belgrade, Serbia
2
Faculty of Physical Chemistry, University of Belgrade, Studentski Trg 12-16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
3
B. I. Stepanov Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Nezalezhnasci Ave. 68-2, 220072 Minsk, Belarus
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2025, 14(24), 4199; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14244199
Submission received: 21 November 2025 / Revised: 3 December 2025 / Accepted: 5 December 2025 / Published: 6 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Food Analytical Methods)

Abstract

This study presents a methodological investigation of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) for elemental analysis of quinoa and amaranth pseudocereals using a TEA CO2 laser. Solid samples were prepared as pressed pellets, and reference data were obtained by ICPOES. Synthetic solid standards were developed for calibration of selected elements (Ca, Fe, Zn, and Mg). Laser parameters were optimized based on the signal-to-noise ratio of characteristic spectral lines and applied to both pseudocereal samples. Emission lines of Mg, Ca, Fe, K, P, Zn, Al, Sr, and Cu were identified, and limits of detection were determined. Quantitative analysis used calibration curves from analyte-to-internal standard line intensity ratios, showing good linearity and agreement with reference values. Plasma diagnostics under optimized conditions revealed an average temperature of ~11,000 K and electron number densities of ~5 × 1016 cm−3 for both samples. Numerical plasma simulations confirmed the experimental results and provided additional insight into plasma composition and behavior. The developed LIBS methodology proved effective for multi-elemental analysis of pseudocereals and shows potential for application to other cereal and plant-based materials with similar composition. It should be noted that this methodology was demonstrated on pelletized samples prepared under controlled laboratory conditions; adaptation to rapid or field-based measurements would require alternative sample preparation strategies. This work provides a methodological framework and experimental validation for LIBS application in food compositional and nutritional analysis.

1. Introduction

Pseudocereals, such as Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa) and Amaranthus spp. (amaranth), have attracted increasing attention from both the scientific community and the general public over the past decade, due to their exceptional nutritional profile, gluten-free nature, and potential to support more sustainable or diverse dietary practices, depending on the agricultural and dietary context. Rich in essential amino acids, proteins, minerals, and dietary fiber, these crops are increasingly explored as alternatives to traditional cereals in specific dietary contexts, especially for individuals with specialized nutritional needs [1,2,3,4,5]. With the rising consumption and production of these pseudocereals, accurate and rapid analysis of their elemental composition has become increasingly important to ensure proper nutritional labeling, verify authenticity, and support crop monitoring—both for quality control and scientific research.
Conventional analytical techniques, such as inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICPOES) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS), although highly precise, require digestion of solid samples and the use of chemical reagents, which can be time-consuming and labor-intensive when applied to complex plant matrices such as pseudocereals [6,7,8]. On the other hand, laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) has gained attention as a rapid and reagent-free technique for elemental analysis of diverse sample types, including food matrices [9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. It is considered a promising technique for both chemical analysis [13,16] and food quality control, including the detection of counterfeit products [17]. Key advantages of LIBS include the simultaneous detection of multiple elements, high sampling speed, and compatibility with a wide range of sample types (solids, liquids, and gases) [11,18]. Additionally, it requires little to no sample preparation and can be effectively combined with complementary techniques such as mass spectrometry [19] and Raman spectroscopy [20].
Recent advances in LIBS methodology—such as improvements in detection limits, plasma diagnostics, and chemometric data processing—have significantly expanded its applicability in food science. Numerous studies have demonstrated successful LIBS applications in the analysis of milk, dairy products, honey, baked goods, beverages, oils, cereals, vegetables, and meats [15,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. However, the application of LIBS for the elemental analysis of pseudocereals remains limited, despite their complex nutritional composition and growing dietary relevance. Rapid, multi-elemental analysis provided by LIBS could therefore offer significant advantages for quality control and nutritional assessment of these crops, highlighting a clear gap in the current literature.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the potential of the LIBS technique as a rapid, reliable, and potentially portable method for the elemental analysis of pseudocereals. Specifically, we seek to (i) assess the suitability of LIBS for both qualitative and quantitative determination of key nutritional elements (Ca, Fe, Zn, and Mg) in quinoa and amaranth seeds [34,35,36], (ii) optimize experimental parameters to enhance analytical performance, and (iii) validate LIBS results against conventional ICPOES measurements. By addressing these objectives, this work aims to demonstrate how LIBS can contribute to improved food quality control and agroanalytical applications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples, Standards and Reagents

Commercially available organic quinoa and amaranth seeds (Beyond®, Serbia) were used for the spectrochemical analysis. The samples were purchased from a certified health food store in Belgrade, Serbia, and were labeled as originating from India. No additional treatment was applied prior to analysis. For the preparation of LIBS standards and the calibration of the ICPOES system, single-element standards (J.T. Baker) and a multi-element standard solution (AccuTrace) were utilized. High-purity nitric acid obtained from Sigma-Aldrich was used in all sample digestions and for the preparation of analytical blanks. It should be noted that only a single commercial batch of each pseudocereal was analyzed; repeated measurements on multiple pellets and laser shots represent technical replication and do not capture potential biological variability between different batches or sources.

2.2. Sample Preparation

The starting materials for ICPOES and LIBS analyses were commercially available quinoa and amaranth seeds (Figure 1b and Figure 2b). Prior to further processing, the quinoa and amaranth seeds were ground into a fine powder (Figure 1c and Figure 2c) using a laboratory mill equipped with a ceramic chamber and agate grinding balls (10–15 mm in diameter). The device, manufactured by LP Praha (serial number 498, year 1959, former Czechoslovakia), enabled gentle and contamination-free grinding suitable for subsequent spectrochemical analysis. No metallic components came into contact with the samples during the grinding process.

2.2.1. Sample Preparation for ICP–OES Analysis

Quinoa and amaranth samples, previously ground to a fine powder, were digested using a microwave-assisted acid digestion system (ETHOS 1 Advanced Microwave Digestion System, Milestone, Italy). Approximately 500 mg of each sample was accurately weighed and transferred into Teflon digestion vessels containing 8 cm3 of nitric acid (HNO3, 1:1 v/v). The vessels were sealed and placed in the microwave digester, where the temperature was increased from room temperature to 200 °C over 15 min and maintained at that temperature for 20 min. After cooling to room temperature, the digests were diluted to a final volume of 50 cm3 with deionized water. The resulting solutions were stored in polyethylene flasks until analysis.

2.2.2. Sample Preparation for LIBS Analysis

For LIBS analysis, quinoa and amaranth samples were prepared in the form of solid pellets (Figure 1d and Figure 2d). Approximately 3.5 g of finely ground material was weighed for each sample and compacted using a manual hydraulic press. The powder was placed into a stainless steel mold with a diameter of 25 mm, and compressed under a pressure of 10 t/cm2 for a duration of 45 min. The mold’s polished, non-reactive surface was chosen to minimize the risk of metal contamination, which was further confirmed by consistency with ICPOES measurements. The resulting pellets had a uniform thickness of about 4 mm and a consistent diameter of 25 mm, making them suitable for laser ablation analysis.

2.2.3. Preparation of Solid Calibration Standards for Quantitative LIBS Analysis

In order to apply quantitative LIBS analysis based on the method of standard additions, a set of solid matrix-matched standards was prepared using quinoa and amaranth as sample matrices. Solid concentration standards for the quantitative determination of selected elements were obtained by thoroughly mixing 3.5 g of finely ground quinoa or amaranth samples with appropriate amounts of single-element standards (J.T. Baker). The powders were first homogenized by vigorous manual mixing and vortex agitation. The resulting mixtures were then moistened with double-distilled water and kneaded thoroughly to form a uniform paste, a step that greatly improves analyte distribution in heterogeneous food matrices. The moist mixtures were transferred into Petri dishes and dried at 60 °C for 24 h. To assess whether the spiking and mixing procedure yielded a sufficiently homogeneous matrix, three pellets were prepared from randomly selected portions of each dried mixture and analyzed by LIBS under identical conditions. The pellets exhibited consistent emission responses, indicating that no meaningful pellet-to-pellet variability—and therefore no significant inhomogeneity—was detected. The homogenized material was subsequently pelletized to produce the calibration standards. To confirm the actual analyte concentrations in the enriched matrices, each synthetic standard was subjected to acid digestion and analyzed using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICPOES).

2.2.4. Reference Method

The reference method for elemental analysis of quinoa and amaranth pseudocereals was based on inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICPOES) combined with microwave-assisted acid digestion. Elemental concentrations in the resulting digests were determined using an ICPOES instrument (iCAP 7400 Duo Series, Thermo Scientific), operating under the following conditions: RF power of 1350 W, generator frequency of 27.12 MHz, CID86 detector, and signal processing based on peak height. Data acquisition and instrument control were performed using Qtegra ISDS software (Thermo Scientific, version 2.10 SR5). Calibration was carried out using external standards at concentrations of 0, 1, 10, 50 and 100 ppm, freshly prepared on a daily basis by appropriate dilution of certified reference solutions (J.T. Baker 1000 μg/mL and AccuTrace 1000 μg/mL). The determined mass fractions of selected elements in quinoa and amaranth samples are presented in Table 1. These values are in good agreement with previously published data [6,7,8]. Synthetic calibration standards were prepared by fortifying quinoa and amaranth matrices with known concentrations of Ca, Fe, Zn, and Mg, as described in Section 2.2.3. Their elemental composition, determined by ICPOES based on triplicate measurements for each sample, is presented in Table 2 and Table 3. The standard deviation of the mean value is reported as the measurement uncertainty. Among the five standards prepared for each matrix, SQ1 and SA1 consisted of the native finely ground quinoa and amaranth seed materials, respectively, without added elements, while SQ2SQ5 and SA2SA5 were fortified with increasing concentrations of Ca, Fe, Zn, and Mg.
To ensure analytical quality, digestion blanks were prepared and analyzed alongside all samples to monitor potential contamination. Certified reference materials (CRMs) were included to validate the accuracy of the measurements. Recovery studies were performed by spiking the pseudocereal samples with known amounts of Ca, Fe, Zn, and Mg, and recoveries ranged between 95 and 105%. Potential matrix effects were assessed and minimized through the use of synthetic calibration standards and proper sample preparation.

2.3. LIBS Experimental Setup

The experimental setup consisted of a laser source with its beam focused onto the target by a single ZnSe lens, while the light emitted from the plasma generated on the target was collected by a collimating lens and transmitted via an optical fiber to a spectrograph coupled to a CCD detector (see Figure 3). The LIBS system was driven by a transversely excited atmospheric pressure carbon dioxide (TEA CO2) laser, which is a compact, custom-built device developed in the laboratory [37]. This laser operates at a wavelength of 10.6 μm, with a pulse repetition frequency of 1 Hz and a multimode beam profile. Each laser pulse exhibits a distinct temporal structure, consisting of an initial gain-switched peak with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 100 ns, followed by a trailing tail lasting approximately 2 μs, Figure 4 [38]. The figure shows the measured profile of the undecomposed laser pulse (black line and dots), along with the deconvolved profiles of the initial peak (red line) and the trailing tail (blue line). Although nominally a single pulse, the temporal profile can be considered as two consecutive components. The initial peak contributes about 35% of the total emitted energy. During the peak, the estimated power density reaches 4 × 107 W cm−2, while during the tail it is 4 × 106 W cm−2. Each pulse delivers 150 mJ of energy, and the samples were irradiated under ambient air conditions.
The laser beam was focused onto the target using a ZnSe lens with a focal length of f = 138 mm. The sample holder was mounted on a xyz translation stage, allowing each laser pulse to irradiate a fresh surface area of the target.
Light emitted from the plasma generated at the target surface was collected using an optical fiber equipped with a collimating lens (SolarLas PS2) and guided to the entrance slit of the monochromator. The optical fiber was positioned at a 30° angle relative to the target surface to optimize signal collection. This setup ensured efficient and precise transmission of the plasma emission for spectral analysis. Spectral acquisition was performed using a Jobin Yvon/ISA monochromator configured in a Czerny–Turner optical layout, with a focal length of 320 mm, a 1200 lines per mm diffraction grating, a linear dispersion of 2.5 nm/mm, and a spectral range spanning from 190 to 850 nm. The monochromator was coupled to a CCD detector (Andor Technology, model DV401A-BVF) featuring a pixel resolution of 1024 × 127 and a pixel size of 26 × 26 μm. The CCD was externally triggered by a synchronization pulse generated from the laser trigger unit, ensuring precise temporal gating and minimizing background noise. No additional programmable gate delay was applied, and the camera exposure time was set to 60 ms per pulse. The combination of an optical fiber-coupled spectrograph and a camera, arranged as described above, is introduced here for the first time in plasma emission detection. The acquired spectra covered a wavelength window of approximately 70 nm per single acquisition, with a spectral dispersion ranging from 0.078 nm/pixel at ~200 nm to 0.054 nm/pixel at ~800 nm. Wavelength calibration of the detection system was carried out using the emission spectrum of a mercury calibration lamp and the spectrum of a vertically stabilized DC arc discharge in argon [39], doped with solutions of various chemical elements. Once the dispersion function and the pixel-to-wavelength mapping were established through this initial calibration procedure, no further routine wavelength recalibration was required. In LIBS measurements performed with this setup, the pixel positions of spectral lines remained stable over the course of the experiments. Nevertheless, potential wavelength drift was monitored whenever necessary by recording the spectrum of the mercury lamp or the arc discharge and verifying that the positions of several isolated strong lines did not deviate beyond the spectral dispersion (a fraction of a pixel). No measurable drift was observed during the measurement campaign.

2.4. Numerical Determination of Plasma Composition and Parameters

The plasma generated by laser ablation of quinoa and amaranth samples was analyzed using a computational program designed for equilibrium plasma calculations [40]. The program assumes that the plasma initially reflects the sample composition and that local thermal equilibrium (LTE) is established at the given temperature and pressure.
Electron and ion densities for all relevant species are determined iteratively using the Saha equation [41], with corrections for ionization potential lowering according to standard models [42,43]. The calculations also enforce quasi-neutrality and account for the contributions of all species to the total pressure.
This procedure provides a consistent set of plasma parameters—including electron density, ionization fractions, and species populations—which can be used to verify the plasma temperatures and electron densities previously determined from experimental measurements for quinoa and amaranth.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Experimental Parameter Optimization

LIBS measurements were performed using a laser pulse energy of 150 mJ. The laser beam was focused at positions within ± 5 mm relative to the target surface to determine the optimal conditions for plasma imaging. The laser spot diameter on the sample was approximately 1.2 mm when focused directly on the surface, and about 1.8 mm when focused 5 mm in front of or behind it. Each measurement represents the sum of ten consecutive individual spectra, each acquired from a fresh location on the target surface to ensure sufficient signal intensity and minimize surface-related variations. This procedure was typically repeated three times, and the resulting spectra were averaged. Consequently, all reported spectra correspond to an average of 30 laser pulses. The camera exposure time was set to 60 ms per pulse, and no programmable gate delay was applied. The laser fluence was 9.8 J/cm2, corresponding to a power density of 34 MW/cm2. These acquisition parameters were optimized to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio and ensure reproducible measurements.
Figure 5 and Figure 6 show the spectra of quinoa and amaranth samples (pure substances without the addition of specific elements, i.e., samples SQ1 and SA1) in selected spectral regions of interest containing identifiable spectral lines of certain elements. By monitoring the intensity and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the spectral lines of zinc (Zn II 202.55 nm), magnesium (Mg I 285.22 nm), and calcium (Ca II 393.38 nm), the laser energy and beam focusing conditions on the target surface were optimized for signal acquisition. This optimization was performed using the quinoa sample only, as its emission intensities were generally lower compared to those of the amaranth sample. The rationale behind this approach was that conditions optimized for weaker signals would also be suitable for samples exhibiting stronger emission. This difference in intensity is evident from the spectra discussed above. As shown in Figure 7, the highest SNR was achieved at a laser energy of 150 mJ, which corresponds to the maximum laser pulse energy. The optimal SNR was also observed when the laser beam was focused directly on the target surface (Figure 7). Negative focal positions in Figure 7 indicate that the focal point of the laser beam was located behind the target surface.
Although the optimization experiments were carried out using quinoa, this approach is justified by the strong compositional similarity between quinoa and amaranth. Both matrices consist predominantly of organic components (carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids) with comparable moisture content and similar ablation behavior under nanosecond laser irradiation. Preliminary LIBS tests performed on amaranth showed no significant differences in plasma morphology, continuum background, or overall emission characteristics relative to quinoa. Therefore, the optimized parameters obtained from quinoa were transferable and ensured stable and reproducible emission signals for both matrices.

3.2. Qualitative Analysis

The elemental composition of quinoa and amaranth samples was investigated using emission spectra obtained from TEA CO2 laser-induced plasma, revealing the presence of characteristic elements in both samples. From Figure 5 and Figure 6, most of the elements listed in Table 1 were clearly observed, with emission intensities well above the background, confirming effective excitation under the same experimental conditions. However, three trace elements—Ba, Mn, and Ti—whose concentrations were determined by ICPOES analysis could not be identified due to spectral interferences affecting their most sensitive emission lines. These interferences were primarily caused by the intense emission lines of Mg, Ca, Fe and C. Consequently, the concentrations of these elements are not included in Table 1. Following the identification of elements in the quinoa and amaranth samples, limits of detection (LOD) were determined for the elements successfully detected. For the four elements subjected to quantitative analysis (Ca, Fe, Zn, and Mg), LOD values were calculated based on calibration curves using the formula [44]:
LOD = (3∙σ)/b
where σ is the standard deviation of the response and b is the slope of the calibration curve. For the remaining elements, LODs were calculated using the formula [45,46]:
LOD = (3∙c)/SNR
where c is the known concentration of the analyte from Table 1, and SNR is the signal-to-noise ratio was calculated based on the intensity of the emission radiation (I) and the background emission in the region around the emission peak, expressed as rms (root mean square). The rms value was obtained by linear fitting of spectral regions nearly free of emission lines on either side of the emission line of interest, representing inter-pixel variations in the continuum emission intensity. The SNR was then calculated using the equation:
SNR = I/rms
Table 4 summarizes the wavelengths used, SNR values, concentrations, and calculated LODs for both samples. The LOD values obtained were sufficiently low to allow reliable determination of elemental composition in both quinoa and amaranth relative to typical concentrations of these elements in pseudocereal grains. For example, calcium, which is commonly present at levels of several hundred µg g−1 in these seeds, showed very low LODs of 4 µg g−1 for quinoa and 14 µg g−1 for amaranth, indicating high sensitivity of the method for this element. Similarly, potassium, typically present at 4–6 mg g−1 in pseudocereals, exhibited LODs of approximately 50 µg g−1 in quinoa and 45 µg g−1 in amaranth, well below the natural concentrations found in these matrices. Trace elements such as copper and strontium, which were present at concentrations of 2.61–5.06 µg g−1 in the samples, showed even lower detection limits (as low as 0.2–0.3 µg g−1), demonstrating that the method can reliably detect these elements at levels relevant for both quality assessment and potential regulatory monitoring. The differences in LOD values between quinoa and amaranth likely reflect matrix effects and variations in signal intensities, but overall, the method provides adequate sensitivity for all measured elements in the context of pseudocereal analysis.

3.3. Quantitative Analysis

The method of standard additions was employed for the quantitative analysis of selected elements—Ca, Fe, Zn, and Mg—in quinoa and amaranth samples. The detailed procedure for the preparation of solid calibration standards is described in Section 2.2.3, and their concentrations, determined by the ICPOES method, are presented in Table 2 and Table 3. Calibration standards SQ2 and SA2 were not used in constructing the calibration curves but served as control samples. To minimize the effects of signal intensity fluctuations, the emission intensity of each analyte line was normalized using an internal standard. This approach is particularly effective when the internal standard is one of the major components of the sample and its concentration remains constant during the preparation of synthetic standards [47]. Ideally, optimal correction efficiency is achieved when the analyte and internal standard exhibit similar excitation energies (Eexc) and ionization potentials (Eion), as this reduces the influence of plasma temperature variations. However, in practice, exact matching of these parameters—especially ionization energy—is rarely achievable. Nonetheless, normalization still significantly reduces signal variability.
For each analyte, calibration curves were constructed by plotting the intensity ratio of the analyte line to the selected internal standard line. Due to the limited spectral window available in a single scan (~70 nm with our setup), the selection of internal standard lines was correspondingly constrained. The resulting calibration curves for quinoa and amaranth are shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively.
Carbon lines were employed as internal standards owing to the element’s high and consistent concentration (~42 wt%) in all calibration samples, as it constitutes a major component of the matrix. Despite not meeting all conventional criteria for an ideal internal standard, carbon provided reliable normalization under our experimental conditions and effectively compensated for shot-to-shot variations. These lines are located close to the analyte lines of Fe and Mg within the recorded spectral intervals. While they do not fully meet conventional criteria for internal standard selection or spectral line suitability [48], using a major matrix element for internal standardization has been demonstrated to partially compensate for shot-to-shot variations in ablated mass and plasma excitation characteristics [49,50,51].
Figure 8 and Figure 9 demonstrate that all calibration curves exhibited satisfactory linearity, regardless of whether carbon, aluminum, or phosphorus was used as the internal standard. The univariate calibration model with signal normalization yielded high coefficients of determination (R2) for all four analyzed elements. The concentrations of Ca, Fe, Zn and Mg in control standards SQ2 and SA2, derived from intensity ratios of analyte to internal standard lines, are indicated by red triangles. These results are in good agreement with the reference values presented in Table 2 and Table 3, within the defined error margins. These results demonstrate that LIBS can reliably quantify specific elements under controlled laboratory conditions in pelletized pseudocereal samples, highlighting the technique’s potential while acknowledging the limited number of elements analyzed.

3.4. Plasma Diagnostic

To evaluate the characteristics of the laser-induced plasma and the excitation conditions relevant for elemental analysis, two key plasma parameters—the temperature (T) and the electron density (Ne)—were determined using standard optical emission spectroscopy techniques. These parameters are fundamental indicators that directly influence the analytical performance of LIBS. Plasma diagnostics were conducted under optimized experimental conditions, with the laser pulse energy set to 150 mJ and the beam precisely focused on the target surface.

3.4.1. Determination of Plasma Temperature Using the Boltzmann Plot Method

In contemporary studies, the Boltzmann plot method is widely applied for plasma temperature determination. In this work, Ca II ion emission lines at 315.89 nm, 317.93 nm, 373.69 nm, 393.37 nm, and 396.85 nm were employed to calculate both the plasma temperature, following established approaches reported in the literature [52,53].
Table 5 summarizes the spectroscopic parameters of the selected Ca II emission lines retrieved from the NIST atomic spectra database, which were employed for the determination of the plasma temperature. The applied relationship is given by the equation:
ln I k i λ k i g k A k i = E k K β T + ln N e T U T
where Iki represents the intensity of the respective emission line, λki is its wavelength, Aki the transition probability, gk the statistical weight of the upper level, Ek the excitation energy of that level, Kβ the Boltzmann constant, U(T)—partition function and T the plasma temperature. Equation (4) can be rearranged into a linear form y = mx + b, allowing the plasma temperature (T) to be derived from the slope of the fitted line, as expressed in equation:
T = 1 K β m
Figure 10 illustrates the Boltzmann plot constructed from five Ca II ion lines belonging to the same ionization state. The plasma temperatures obtained for quinoa and amaranth samples are slightly different (10,300 K and 12,400 K, respectively; see Figure 10). Considering that a 10% difference is within the acceptable uncertainty for Boltzmann plot analysis and has negligible impact on electron density calculations, an average plasma temperature of approximately 11,000 K is used for further discussion. This value is fully consistent with the expected temperature range of LIBS plasma generated from organic materials (8000–15,000 K according to literature data [54] and indicates that the plasma possessed sufficient energy for effective atomization and ionization of the elements present in the samples. The observed difference between quinoa and amaranth temperatures may be related to intrinsic variations in sample composition: amaranth, with higher mineral content, could form a denser and longer-lived plasma, potentially resulting in a higher effective temperature, while quinoa, richer in organic matter, might exhibit faster plasma expansion and cooling. These observations likely reflect differences in laser–material interaction rather than experimental inconsistency, although further time-resolved or plume imaging studies would be required to confirm this behavior.

3.4.2. Determination of Electron Number Density

Following the determination of the plasma temperature via the Boltzmann plot method, the electron number density (Ne) was evaluated. Both plasma temperature and electron density calculations are valid under the assumption of local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE). Given the 60 ms integration time of the CCD, these results represent time-averaged estimates, and LTE is treated as an approximate working assumption rather than a condition strictly satisfied throughout the plasma lifetime. Direct measurement of Ne from Stark broadening of spectral lines was attempted; however, due to limited instrumental resolution and overlapping spectral features, the width of the calcium (Ca II at 396.85 nm) and hydrogen (Hα at 656.28 nm) lines could not be reliably used. As an initial estimate, the McWhirter criterion was applied to provide a lower bound for the electron density based on the previously determined average plasma temperature of 11,000 K [55,56]. The criterion is expressed as:
N e 1.6 · 10 12 T E 3
where ∆E is the largest energy separation between the levels of the Ca II transition at 396.85 nm. Based on the average plasma temperature, the critical electron density was estimated to be approximately 5 × 1015 cm−3, providing a lower bound required to satisfy the McWhirter criterion for LTE in both quinoa and amaranth samples, within the measurement uncertainty.
To obtain a more quantitative estimation of the electron number density, we used two well-resolved magnesium lines—Mg I at 285.22 nm and Mg II line at 279.55 nm [56]. These lines were chosen due to their high intensity and minimal spectral overlap, allowing reliable intensity measurements independent of Stark broadening effects. The relative population of the Mg I and Mg II excited states was determined from the measured line intensities, corrected for the respective transition probabilities (Einstein A coefficients) and statistical weights, according to the Boltzmann distribution [57]:
N j I λ g j A i j e E i o n / K β T
where Iλ is the measured line intensity, gj the degeneracy of the upper level, Aij the Einstein coefficient, Ej the energy of the upper state, Kβ the Boltzmann constant, and T the plasma temperature previously obtained from the Boltzmann plot method. The electron number density was calculated directly from the measured line intensities using the Saha equation expressed in terms of the spectral line intensities [41]:
N e = I M g   I I M g   I I g M g   I I A M g   I I U M g   I I g M g   I A M g   I U M g   I 2 π m e K β T h 2 3 / 2 e E i o n K β T
where IMg I and IMg II are the measured line intensities, UMg I and UMg II are the partition functions for Mg I and Mg II, me is the electron mass, h is Planck’s constant, Eion = 7.646 eV is the ionization energy of Mg I.
Using the measured line intensities of Mg I (285.22 nm) and Mg II (279.55 nm), the electron number density was estimated to be approximately 5 × 1016 cm−3. This value is roughly one order of magnitude higher than the McWhirter lower limit, indicating that the plasma conditions are consistent with the assumptions of LTE and supporting the applicability of the Boltzmann and Saha approaches for plasma diagnostics under the present experimental conditions. The small differences observed between quinoa and amaranth are within experimental uncertainty and, for this diagnostic parameter (electron density), do not allow us to resolve or quantify potential intrinsic variations in plasma properties.

3.4.3. Numerical Analysis of the Ablated Quinoa and Amaranth Plasmas

The equilibrium composition of plasmas generated by laser ablation of quinoa and amaranth samples was computed using the numerical procedure described in Section 2.4. Calculations were performed over a temperature range of 5000–20,000 K, corresponding to the typical plasma temperatures encountered in LIBS experiments. The total pressure was assumed to be constant and equal to 1 bar. This pressure value is used as a standard reference condition in equilibrium plasma modeling and is not intended to represent the transient pressure evolution during LIBS plasma expansion; the calculations therefore provide qualitative trends in composition rather than a dynamic physical reconstruction. The initial molar compositions of quinoa and amaranth used for the plasma equilibrium calculations are summarized in Table 6. For the organic elements (H, C, O, and N), molar fractions were estimated based on the proximate composition reported in the literature [58,59], since exact elemental concentrations are not available; the percentages of proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, and fibers were converted into elemental composition. The mineral contents were obtained from ICPOES measurements performed in this work (see Table 1). Combining these data, the molar fractions of all elements in the total composition of quinoa and amaranth were calculated and normalized to 100%.
Figure 11 and Figure 12 show the simulated equilibrium compositions of plasmas corresponding to quinoa and amaranth, respectively. Each curve represents the calculated number density of a specific element at a given ionization stage. According to the simulation, at temperatures above 14,000 K, electrons are predicted to become the most abundant species in the plasma. The modeled increase in electron density is accompanied by a corresponding rise in the calculated concentrations of singly charged ions, indicated by the dashed lines. Each figure is divided into three subplots to facilitate analysis, as displaying all elements on a single graph would result in an overly crowded and unreadable plot. The first subplot shows the main elements of the sample with significant mole fractions (above 0.1 mol %), along with electrons. The second and third subplots present elements with smaller mole fractions, arranged in descending order. According to the simulation results, at lower ionization temperatures dominant model-predicted source of electrons is potassium (blue dashed line). Between 7000 and 15,000 K, the model indicates that carbon ionization becomes the primary contributor (red dashed line), while above 15,000 K the calculated increase in electron density is further influenced by the ionization of hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen (black, green, and gray dashed lines). Elements with lower mole fractions have a negligible simulated effect on the electron concentration, which is why the electron density curve is shown only in the first subplot of each figure.
The electron densities estimated from Figure 11 and Figure 12, using the average plasma temperature of 11,000 K obtained in Section 3.4.1 from the calcium ion lines, are 5.2 × 1016 cm−3 for quinoa and 5.7 × 1016 cm−3 for amaranth. These values are in good agreement with the results reported in Section 3.4.2, where the electron densities were found to be approximately 5 × 1016 cm−3 for both samples. The minor differences between these estimates are within the expected uncertainty of the measurements and reflect the influence of different diagnostic approaches. It should also be noted that thermal equilibrium in the plasma exists only for a short period (~100 ns), while the CCD camera exposure time was much longer (60 ms). Consequently, the recorded spectral line profiles represent an integration over both equilibrium and non-equilibrium phases of the plasma, and slight variations in the calculated electron densities are therefore expected.

4. Conclusions

This work presents the first LIBS analysis of quinoa and amaranth pseudocereals. Solid samples and synthetic calibration standards were prepared, and quantitative analysis of Ca, Fe, Zn, and Mg was performed using calibration curves based on analyte-to-internal-standard intensity ratios. Distinct emission lines of Mg, Ca, Fe, K, P, Zn, Al, Sr, and Cu were observed in the recorded spectra, and limits of detection were determined. The obtained LOD values were sufficiently low for reliable quantification within the concentration ranges present in the samples and are consistent with typical LIBS performance in plant matrices. Calibration curves showed good linearity, and experimentally obtained concentrations agreed with reference ICPOES values, supporting the reliability of the applied quantitative procedure.
Plasma diagnostics under optimized experimental conditions indicated an average plasma temperature of ~11,000 K and electron densities of ~5 × 1016 cm−3 for both quinoa and amaranth. These values are typical for LIBS plasma generated from organic materials and demonstrate that the applied conditions ensured effective atomization and ionization. Minor variations in the estimated parameters were within expected uncertainties and may reflect differences in sample composition. Numerical plasma simulations further supported these observations by providing model-based insight into plasma composition and ionization behavior; however, these simulations were not directly validated by time-resolved diagnostics.
Overall, the developed LIBS methodology demonstrates that accurate multi-element quantification of pelletized pseudocereal samples is feasible under controlled laboratory conditions. While the applicability of the approach is currently limited by the restricted set of quantified elements, the use of homogenized pressed pellets, and the absence of time-resolved plasma characterization, the results suggest that LIBS may have potential for application to similar cereal-like or plant-based materials, although additional studies are required to confirm this. Adaptation to rapid or field-based measurements would require alternative sample preparation strategies. Future work involving a broader analyte set, native (non-pelletized) sample forms, and temporally resolved plasma measurements would further expand the scope and robustness of this methodology. Also, the present study is based on a single commercial batch of quinoa and amaranth, and therefore the observed differences should be interpreted with caution. Future work including multiple biological replicates from different sources would strengthen the robustness and generalizability of the findings.

Author Contributions

D.R.: Conceptualization; Methodology; Investigation; Validation; Formal Analysis; Writing—Original Draft; Writing—Review and Editing; Visualization; M.S. (Marjetka Savić): Investigation; Formal Analysis; Writing—Review and Editing; Visualization; M.S. (Milovan Stoiljković): Investigation; Writing—Review and Editing; Visualization; M.R.: Investigation; Formal Analysis; Visualization; V.V.L.: Investigation; Formal Analysis; N.Đ.: Investigation; Formal Analysis; A.N.C.: Writing—Review and Editing; Visualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This research was primarily conducted in Serbia and was funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia; contract numbers: 451–03–137/2025–03/200146, 451–03–136/2025-03/200146, and 451–03–136/2025–03/200017. The collaborative component of this research was carried out in cooperation with the B. I. Stepanov Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, within the framework of the Belarusian National Research Program “Convergence–2025”, task 2.2.02.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AEinstein coefficient
CCDCharge-Coupled Device
DCDirect Current
EexcExcitation Energy
EionIonization Potential
FWHMFull Width at Half Maximum
ICP–MSInductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry
ICPOESInductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry
IIntensity
KβBoltzmann constant
λWavelength
LODLimits of Detection
LTELocal Thermodynamic Equilibrium
NeElectron density
rmsroot mean square
R2Coefficient of determination
RFRadio Frequency
SNRSignal-to-Noise Ratio
TEA CO2Transversely Excited Atmospheric pressure Carbon Dioxide
TTemperature
U(T)Partition Function
LIBSLaser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy
gStatistical weight

References

  1. Guo, Z.; Deng, X.; Ping, C.; Li, X.; Li, D.; Wu, X.; Xiao, X.; Kong, R. Quinoa: Nutritional and phytochemical value, beneficial effects, and future applications. Appl. Food Res. 2025, 5, 100766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ahmed, I.A.M.; Al Juhaimi, F.; Özcan, M.M. Insights into the nutritional value and bioactive properties of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa): Past, present and future prospective. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 56, 3726–3741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Olmos, E.; Roman-Garcia, I.; Reguera, M.; Mestanza, C.; Fernandez-Garcia, N. An update on the nutritional profiles of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.), amaranth (Amaranthus spp.), and chia (Salvia hispanica L.), three key species with the potential to contribute to food security worldwide. JSFA Rep. 2022, 2, 591–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Soriano-García, M.; Aguirre-Díaz, I.S. Nutritional Functional Value and Therapeutic Utilization of Amaranth, Nutritional Value of Amaranth; Waisundara, V.Y., Ed.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Balakrishnan, G.; Schneider, R.G. The Role of Amaranth, Quinoa, and Millets for the Development of Healthy, Sustainable Food Products—A Concise Review. Foods 2022, 11, 2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bratovcic, A.; Saric, E. Determination of essential nutrients and cadmium in the white quinoa and amaranth seeds. Croat. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 11, 135–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bolaños, D.; Marchevsky, E.J.; Camiña, J.M. Elemental analysis of amaranth, chia, sesame, linen, and quinoa seeds by ICP-OES: Assessment of classification by chemometrics. Food Anal. Methods 2016, 9, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Alvarez-Jubete, L.; Arendt, E.K.; Gallagher, E. Nutritive value and chemical composition of pseudocereals as gluten-free ingredients. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2009, 60, 240–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Multari, R.A.; Cremers, D.A.; Dupre, J.A.M.; Gustafson, J.E. Detection of Biological Contaminants on Foods and Food Surfaces Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 8687–8694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kim, G.; Kwak, J.; Choi, J.; Park, K. Detection of Nutrient Elements and Contamination by Pesticides in Spinach and Rice Samples Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 718–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hassoun, A.; Måge, I.; Schmidt, W.F.; Temiz, H.T.; Li, L.; Kim, H.-Y.; Nilsen, H.; Biancolillo, A.; Aït-Kaddour, A.; Sikorski, M.; et al. Fraud in Animal Origin Food Products: Advances in Emerging Spectroscopic Detection Methods over the Past Five Years. Foods 2020, 9, 1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Velioglu, H.M.; Sezer, B.; Bilge, G.; Baytur, S.E.; Boyaci, I.H. Identification of offal adulteration in beef by laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). Meat Sci. 2018, 138, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Markiewicz-Keszycka, M.; Cama-Moncunill, X.; Casado-Gavalda, M.P.; Dixit, Y.; Cama-Moncunill, R.; Cullen, P.J.; Sullivan, C. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) for food analysis: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 65, 80–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sezer, B.; Durna, S.; Bilge, G.; Berkkan, A.; Yetisemiyen, A.; Boyaci, I.H. Identification of milk fraud using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). Int. Dairy J. 2018, 81, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sezer, B.; Bilge, G.; Boyaci, I.H. Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Based Protein Assay for Cereal Samples. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 9459–9463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Velásquez-Ferrín, A.; Babos, D.V.; Marina-Montes, C.; Anzano, J. Rapidly growing trends in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for food analysis. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 2021, 56, 492–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wu, X.; Shin, S.; Gondhalekar, C.; Patsekin, V.; Bae, E.; Robinson, J.P.; Rajwa, B. Rapid Food Authentication Using a Portable Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy System. Foods 2023, 12, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Cremers, D.A.; Radziemski, L.J. Handbook of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK; Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dong, M.; Wei, L.; González, J.J.; Oropeza, D.; Chirinos, J.; Mao, X.; Lu, J.; Russo, R.E. Coal discrimination analysis using tandem laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 7003–7010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shameem, K.M.; Dhanada, V.; Harikrishnan, S.; George, S.D.; Kartha, V.; Santhosh, C.; Unnikrishnan, V. Echelle LIBS-Raman system: A versatile tool for mineralogical and archaeological applications. Talanta 2020, 208, 120482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Peng, J.; Xie, W.; Jiang, J.; Zhao, Z.; Zhou, F.; Liu, F. Fast Quantification of Honey Adulteration with Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy and Chemometric Methods. Foods 2020, 9, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pasha, A.Z.; Bukhari, S.A.; El Enshasy, H.A.; El Adawi, H.; Al Obaid, S. Compositional analysis and physicochemical evaluation of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) mucilage for medicinal purposes. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 774–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Abdel-Salam, Z.; Al Sharnoubi, J.; Harith, M. Qualitative evaluation of maternal milk and commercial infant formulas via LIBS. Talanta 2013, 115, 422–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bilge, G.; Velioglu, H.M.; Sezer, B.; Eseller, K.E.; Boyaci, I.H. Identification of meat species by using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Meat Sci. 2016, 119, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, T.; Huang, L.; Yao, M.; Hu, H.; Wang, C.; Liu, M. Quantitative analysis of chromium in potatoes by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy coupled with linear multivariate calibration. Appl. Opt. 2015, 54, 7807–7812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yu, X.; Li, Y.; Gu, X.; Bao, J.; Yang, H.; Sun, L. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy application in environmental monitoring of water quality: A review. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2014, 186, 8969–8980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nespeca, M.G.; Vieira, A.L.; Júnior, D.S.; Neto, J.A.G.; Ferreira, E.C. Detection and quantification of adulterants in honey by LIBS. Food Chem. 2020, 311, 125886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wang, J.; Zheng, P.; Liu, H.; Fang, L. Classification of Chinese tea leaves using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy combined with the discriminant analysis method. Anal. Methods 2016, 8, 3204–3209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bilge, G.; Boyacı, İ.H.; Eseller, K.E.; Tamer, U.; Çakır, S. Analysis of bakery products by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Food Chem. 2015, 181, 186–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Markiewicz-Keszycka, M.; Zhao, M.; Cama-Moncunill, X.; El Arnaout, T.; Becker, D.; O’DOnnell, C.; Cullen, P.J.; Sullivan, C.; Casado-Gavalda, M.P. Rapid analysis of magnesium in infant formula powder using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Int. Dairy J. 2019, 97, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kongbonga, Y.G.M.; Ghalila, H.; Onana, M.B.; Ben Lakhdar, Z. Classification of vegetable oils based on their concentration of saturated fatty acids using laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). Food Chem. 2014, 147, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Temiz, H.T.; Sezer, B.; Berkkan, A.; Tamer, U.; Boyaci, I.H. Assessment of laser induced breakdown spectroscopy as a tool for analysis of butter adulteration. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2018, 67, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bilge, G.; Sezer, B.; Eseller, K.E.; Berberoğlu, H.; Köksel, H.; Boyacı, İ.H. Determination of Ca addition to the wheat flour by using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2016, 242, 1685–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Suliburska, J.; Krejpcio, Z. Evaluation of the content and bioaccessibility of iron, zinc, calcium and magnesium from groats, rice, leguminous grains and nuts. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 589–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Guan, D.-X.; Menezes-Blackburn, D.; Li, G. The Importance of Mineral Elements for Sustainable Crop Production. Agronomy 2024, 14, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. White, P.J.; Broadley, M.R. Biofortification of crops with seven mineral elements often lacking in human diets––Iron, zinc, copper, calcium, magnesium, selenium and iodine. New Phytol. 2009, 182, 49–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Trtica, M.S.; Gakovic, B.M.; Radak, B.B.; Miljanic, S.S. Efficient small-scale TEA CO2 laser for material surface modification. In International Conference on Atomic and Molecular Pulsed Lasers IV; Tarasenko, V.F., Mayer, G.V., Petrash, G.G., Eds.; SPIE: Tomsk, Russia, 2002; p. 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Savovic, J.; Stoiljkovic, M.; Kuzmanovic, M.; Momcilovic, M.; Ciganovic, J.; Rankovic, D.; Zivkovic, S.; Trtica, M. The feasibility of TEA CO2 laser-induced plasma for spectrochemical analysis of geological samples in simulated Martian conditions. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 2016, 118, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pavlović, M.S.; Pavlović, N.Z.; Marinković, M. Excitation and ionization characteristics of a d.c. argon plasma evaluated by means of emission and absorption of iron lines, and broadening of the hydrogen Hβ line—Experimental facts. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 1991, 46, 1487–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ristić, M.; Krstevski, N.; Ranković, D.; Marković, M.; Šajić, A.; Kuzmanović, M. The influence of continuum lowering on the equilibrium composition of plasma: Case study of laser-induced plasma on a WC–Cu target. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 2024, 66, 125014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Miziolek, A.W.; Schechter, I.; Palleschi, V. (Eds.) Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS): Fundamentals and Applications; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  42. Stewart, J.C.; Pyatt, K.D., Jr. Lowering of Ionization Potentials in Plasmas. Astrophys. J. 1966, 144, 1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ciricosta, O.; Vinko, S.M.; Chung, H.-K.; Jackson, C.; Lee, R.W.; Preston, T.R.; Rackstraw, D.S.; Wark, J.S. Detailed model for hot-dense aluminum plasmas generated by an x-ray free electron laser. Phys. Plasmas 2016, 23, 022707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Poggialini, F.; Legnaioli, S.; Campanella, B.; Cocciaro, B.; Lorenzetti, G.; Raneri, S.; Palleschi, V. Calculating the Limits of Detection in Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy: Not as Easy as It Might Seem. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 3642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Šajić, A.; Ranković, D.; Ristić, M.; Marković, M.; Ciganović, J.; Kuzmanović, M. Quantitative analysis of soda-lime glass by the LIBS technique based on the TEA CO2 laser. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 2025, 224, 107113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fisher, B.T.; Johnsen, H.A.; Buckley, S.G.; Hahn, D.W. Temporal Gating for the Optimization of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Detection and Analysis of Toxic Metals. Appl. Spectrosc. 2001, 55, 1312–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tognoni, E.; Cristoforetti, G. Signal and noise in Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy: An introductory review. Opt. Laser Technol. 2016, 79, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Guezenoc, J.; Gallet-Budynek, A.; Bousquet, B. Critical review and advices on spectral-based normalization methods for LIBS quantitative analysis. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 2019, 160, 105688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sun, Q.; Tran, M.; Smith, B.; Winefordner, J. Determination of Mn and Si in iron ore by laser-induced plasma spectroscopy. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 413, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ismail, M.A.; Imam, H.; Elhassan, A.; Youniss, W.T.; Harith, M.A. LIBS limit of detection and plasma parameters of some elements in two different metallic matrices. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2004, 19, 489–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Juvé, V.; Portelli, R.; Boueri, M.; Baudelet, M.; Yu, J. Space-resolved analysis of trace elements in fresh vegetables using ultraviolet nanosecond laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 2008, 63, 1047–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Manelski, H.; Wiens, R.; Bousquet, B.; Hansen, P.; Schröder, S.; Clegg, S.; Martin, N.; Nelson, A.; Martinez, R.; Ollila, A.; et al. LIBS plasma diagnostics with SuperCam on Mars: Implications for quantification of elemental abundances. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 2024, 222, 107061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Idris, N.; Usmawanda, T.N.; Lahna, K.; Ramli, M. Temperature estimation using Boltzmann plot method of many calcium emission lines in laser plasma produced on river clamshell sample. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 1120, 012098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rezaei, F.; Eskandary, A.; Zahedi, M.; Beheshtipour, S.; Palleschi, V. A Comprehensive Review of the Fundamentals, Progress, and Applications of the LIBS Method in Analysis of Plants: Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis. Photonics 2025, 12, 1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Cristoforetti, G.; De Giacomo, A.; Dell’Aglio, M.; Legnaioli, S.; Tognoni, E.; Palleschi, V.; Omenetto, N. Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium in Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy: Beyond the McWhirter criterion. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 2010, 65, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Molina, M.J.; Sarchi, C.; Tesio, A.Y.; Costa-Vera, C.; Pace, D.M.D. Quantitative Analysis of Lithium in Natural Brines from the Lithium Triangle by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy. Atoms 2025, 13, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Stetzler, J.; Tang, S.; Chinni, R.C. Plasma Temperature and Electron Density Determination Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) in Earth’s and Mars’s Atmospheres. Atoms 2020, 8, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. De Bock, P.; Daelemans, L.; Selis, L.; Raes, K.; Vermeir, P.; Eeckhout, M.; Van Bockstaele, F. Comparison of the Chemical and Technological Characteristics of Wholemeal Flours Obtained from Amaranth (Amaranthus sp.), Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) and Buckwheat (Fagopyrum sp.) Seeds. Foods 2021, 10, 651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Ogungbenle, H.N. Nutritional evaluation and functional properties of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) flour. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2003, 54, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Quinoa pseudocereal used in the experiments: (a) photograph of a plant in its natural environment, (b) commercially obtained seeds, (c) flour produced by grinding the seeds, and (d) pelleted sample prepared for LIBS analysis.
Figure 1. Quinoa pseudocereal used in the experiments: (a) photograph of a plant in its natural environment, (b) commercially obtained seeds, (c) flour produced by grinding the seeds, and (d) pelleted sample prepared for LIBS analysis.
Foods 14 04199 g001
Figure 2. Amaranth pseudocereal used in the experiments: (a) photograph of a plant in its natural environment, (b) commercially obtained seeds, (c) flour produced by grinding the seeds, and (d) pelleted sample prepared for LIBS analysis.
Figure 2. Amaranth pseudocereal used in the experiments: (a) photograph of a plant in its natural environment, (b) commercially obtained seeds, (c) flour produced by grinding the seeds, and (d) pelleted sample prepared for LIBS analysis.
Foods 14 04199 g002
Figure 3. LIBS experimental setup.
Figure 3. LIBS experimental setup.
Foods 14 04199 g003
Figure 4. Pulse shape characteristics of the TEA CO2 laser.
Figure 4. Pulse shape characteristics of the TEA CO2 laser.
Foods 14 04199 g004
Figure 5. LIBS spectra segments of unmodified quinoa (SQ1).
Figure 5. LIBS spectra segments of unmodified quinoa (SQ1).
Foods 14 04199 g005
Figure 6. LIBS spectra segments of unmodified amaranth (SA1).
Figure 6. LIBS spectra segments of unmodified amaranth (SA1).
Foods 14 04199 g006
Figure 7. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for the Zn II 202.55 nm, Mg I 285.22 nm, and Ca II 393.38 nm lines in the quinoa sample, as a function of laser pulse energy and focal position. Negative values in focal position indicate that the focal point of the laser beam is located behind the target surface.
Figure 7. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for the Zn II 202.55 nm, Mg I 285.22 nm, and Ca II 393.38 nm lines in the quinoa sample, as a function of laser pulse energy and focal position. Negative values in focal position indicate that the focal point of the laser beam is located behind the target surface.
Foods 14 04199 g007
Figure 8. Calibration curves obtained by LIBS for Ca, Fe, Zn, and Mg in quinoa using intensity normalization.
Figure 8. Calibration curves obtained by LIBS for Ca, Fe, Zn, and Mg in quinoa using intensity normalization.
Foods 14 04199 g008
Figure 9. Calibration curves obtained by LIBS for Ca, Fe, Zn, and Mg in amaranth using intensity normalization.
Figure 9. Calibration curves obtained by LIBS for Ca, Fe, Zn, and Mg in amaranth using intensity normalization.
Foods 14 04199 g009
Figure 10. Boltzmann plots used for the determination of plasma temperature for quinoa and amaranth samples.
Figure 10. Boltzmann plots used for the determination of plasma temperature for quinoa and amaranth samples.
Foods 14 04199 g010
Figure 11. Simulated number densities of plasma constituents for quinoa at 1 bar. Line styles indicate ionization stages (I–IV), and colors represent different elements.
Figure 11. Simulated number densities of plasma constituents for quinoa at 1 bar. Line styles indicate ionization stages (I–IV), and colors represent different elements.
Foods 14 04199 g011
Figure 12. Simulated number densities of plasma constituents for amaranth at 1 bar. Line styles indicate ionization stages (I–IV), and colors represent different elements.
Figure 12. Simulated number densities of plasma constituents for amaranth at 1 bar. Line styles indicate ionization stages (I–IV), and colors represent different elements.
Foods 14 04199 g012
Table 1. Elemental composition of quinoa and amaranth samples determined by ICPOES (expressed in µg g−1).
Table 1. Elemental composition of quinoa and amaranth samples determined by ICPOES (expressed in µg g−1).
PKMgCaFeZnSiAlCuSr
Quinoa44355645163446859.227.286.16.445.063.12
Amaranth596148752726147361.937.328.316.84.972.61
Table 2. Concentrations of selected elements (µg g−1) in synthetic quinoa standards prepared for LIBS analysis, as determined by ICPOES.
Table 2. Concentrations of selected elements (µg g−1) in synthetic quinoa standards prepared for LIBS analysis, as determined by ICPOES.
CalibrationConcentration (µg g−1)
StandardCaFeZnMg
SQ1470 ± 1559 ± 227 ± 11640 ± 50
SQ2820 ± 30122 ± 446 ± 22960 ± 70
SQ31700 ± 60250 ± 10113 ± 35900 ± 210
SQ42900 ± 90430 ± 15182 ± 612,100 ± 400
SQ54100 ± 120590 ± 20253 ± 715,300 ± 500
Table 3. Concentrations of selected elements (µg g−1) in synthetic amaranth standards prepared for LIBS analysis, as determined by ICPOES.
Table 3. Concentrations of selected elements (µg g−1) in synthetic amaranth standards prepared for LIBS analysis, as determined by ICPOES.
CalibrationConcentration (µg g−1)
StandardCaFeZnMg
SA11470 ± 5062 ± 237 ± 12730 ± 50
SA22660 ± 80131 ± 473 ± 24830 ± 160
SA35100 ± 170260 ± 10135 ± 39200 ± 300
SA48800 ± 250400 ± 15227 ± 615,300 ± 500
SA513,800 ± 300610 ± 20362 ± 721,800 ± 600
Table 4. Limits of detection (LOD) obtained by LIBS analysis of quinoa and amaranth samples.
Table 4. Limits of detection (LOD) obtained by LIBS analysis of quinoa and amaranth samples.
ElementWavelength (nm)SNR quinoacquinoa
(µg g−1)
LODquinoa
(µg g−1)
SNR Amaranthcamaranth
(µg g−1)
LODamaranth
(µg g−1)
P I213.62354435380515961350
K I404.14339564550325487545
Mg I285.22114163443137272660
Ca II393.383504684330147314
Fe II259.9410759.229961.92
Zn II202.554527.225137.32
Si I288.166586.145728.32
Al I396.13386.440.56316.81
Cu I324.76685.060.3614.970.3
Sr II407.77543.120.2472.610.2
Table 5. Spectroscopic parameters of Ca II lines used for plasma temperature determination.
Table 5. Spectroscopic parameters of Ca II lines used for plasma temperature determination.
IonWavelength (nm)Aki (108 s−1)gkEk (eV)
Ca II315.893.147.05
Ca II317.933.667.05
Ca II373.691.726.47
Ca II393.371.543.15
Ca II396.851.423.12
Table 6. Initial molar composition of quinoa and amaranth used for plasma equilibrium calculations.
Table 6. Initial molar composition of quinoa and amaranth used for plasma equilibrium calculations.
ElementQuinoa (mol %)Amaranth (mol %)Source/Basis
H49.1449.7Calculated from literature data
C29.429.5Calculated from literature data
O19.819.4Calculated from literature data
N1.31.5Calculated from literature data
K0.1210.0487ICP–OES (this work)
P0.1200.1ICP–OES (this work)
Mg5.65 × 10−20.1ICP–OES (this work)
Si3.07 × 10−32.83 × 10−3ICP–OES (this work)
Ca9.84 × 10−30.0147ICP–OES (this work)
Al8.9 × 10−31.68 × 10−3ICP–OES (this work)
Fe8.92 × 10−36.19 × 10−3ICP–OES (this work)
Zn3.27 × 10−33.73 × 10−3ICP–OES (this work)
Cu1.3 × 10−34.97 × 10−4ICP–OES (this work)
Mn6.99 × 10−41.0 × 10−3ICP–OES (this work)
Sr3.0 × 10−41.5 × 10−4ICP–OES (this work)
Ba5.0 × 10−62.0 × 10−5ICP–OES (this work)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ranković, D.; Savić, M.; Stoiljković, M.; Ristić, M.; Luchkouski, V.V.; Đorđević, N.; Chumakov, A.N. Methodological Approach to LIBS Elemental Analysis and Plasma Characterization of Quinoa and Amaranth Pseudocereals Using a TEA CO2 Laser. Foods 2025, 14, 4199. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14244199

AMA Style

Ranković D, Savić M, Stoiljković M, Ristić M, Luchkouski VV, Đorđević N, Chumakov AN. Methodological Approach to LIBS Elemental Analysis and Plasma Characterization of Quinoa and Amaranth Pseudocereals Using a TEA CO2 Laser. Foods. 2025; 14(24):4199. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14244199

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ranković, Dragan, Marjetka Savić, Milovan Stoiljković, Miroslav Ristić, Vyacheslav V. Luchkouski, Neda Đorđević, and Aleksandr N. Chumakov. 2025. "Methodological Approach to LIBS Elemental Analysis and Plasma Characterization of Quinoa and Amaranth Pseudocereals Using a TEA CO2 Laser" Foods 14, no. 24: 4199. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14244199

APA Style

Ranković, D., Savić, M., Stoiljković, M., Ristić, M., Luchkouski, V. V., Đorđević, N., & Chumakov, A. N. (2025). Methodological Approach to LIBS Elemental Analysis and Plasma Characterization of Quinoa and Amaranth Pseudocereals Using a TEA CO2 Laser. Foods, 14(24), 4199. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14244199

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop