1. Introduction
Dietary choices exert a profound impact not only on individual health but also on climate change and the wider sustainability of the planet [
1]. Food production accounts for roughly one-third of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with meat production responsible for more than half of this figure [
2]. Transitioning towards plant-based alternatives could reduce such emissions by almost half [
3], prompting major food corporations such as Subway, Burger King, and Starbucks to expand their plant-based offerings as part of their sustainability strategies [
4,
5].
Plant-based diets, which consider any food category from animals off-limits, are deemed appropriate interventions in response to the issues of the environment, animal cruelty, and human health in a one-package deal [
6]. Along with this, the sustainable consumption and production goals are integrated under the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), centered around SDG 2 (hunger eradication), SDG 3 (health and wellbeing), and SDG 12 (sustainable production and consumption) [
7]. Thus, consumer focus has been directed towards plant-based products in line with these desires, and the global market is estimated to reach a value greater than USD 77 billion by 2025 [
8]. Throughout all of this, it has been necessary to interrogate how consumers react to the implementation of plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs), both from an academic and business standpoint [
9,
10].
According to the well-established studies, a range of variables influence plant-based eating spans from personal health beliefs to product characteristics, from social attitudes to moral or environmental issues [
10,
11,
12,
13,
14]. Nevertheless, a significant area that remains unclear in these studies is the use of broad motivational factors, as they tend to divide and do not account for the larger picture of PBMA consumption. The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) has been, so far, a very suitable framework for examining consumer behavior in this area and for identifying these variables [
15,
16,
17,
18,
19,
20,
21,
22]. Nonetheless, there is still a gap remaining in the empirical findings. For instance, it is true that the validity of attitudes, norms, and perceived behavioral control has been reported in many studies [
20,
23,
24]. However, this seems to be contradicted by the results published by other studies that emerged with different numbers, significantly, or opposite effects [
24,
25,
26,
27,
28]. This once again brings the issue of the unexplained psychological complexities of PBMA buying behaviors to the fore.
Moreover, scholars increasingly argue that the TPB alone may be insufficient to account for the complex, value-driven nature of food-related decisions [
18,
19,
29,
30]. The Value–Attitude–Behavior (VAB) model complements TPB by incorporating underlying personal values, such as altruistic (environmental consciousness) and egoistic (health consciousness) orientations, which have been shown to shape pro-environmental and ethical consumption [
31,
32,
33,
34,
35]. Integrating the TPB and VAB models can therefore provide a more comprehensive theoretical lens through which to examine consumers’ behavioral intentions towards PBMAs [
36,
37,
38].
Methodologically, most existing research has employed symmetric analytical techniques such as partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM), which assume linear and additive relationships among variables [
5,
7,
14,
20,
22,
23,
25,
26,
27,
39]. This linear perspective may fail to capture the complex, configurational nature of consumer decision processes [
1,
40]. To overcome this limitation, a hybrid methodological approach coupling PLS-SEM with fsQCA (fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis) and NCA (necessary condition analysis), is applied to allow for a more comprehensive and detailed study of both sufficient and necessary conditions underlying PBMA purchase intentions.
Collectively, this work aims to fill a theoretical and methodological void within the literature by striving: (1) To determine how environmental and health consciousness affect consumers’ attitudes towards PBMAs; (2) To explore how attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control influence purchase intention; (3) To examine the mediating role of attitude in connecting environmental and health consciousness variables with behavior intention; and (4) To find both sufficient conditions and necessary conditions of factors for driving PBMA purchase intention through an integrative framework of PLS–fsQCA–NCA.
This study offers a holistic understanding of the process of sustainable dietary transition and adds value to sustainable consumption theory by combining the value-based and behavioral perspectives, as well as practical implications for policymakers and industry in the shift toward more sustainable dietary transitions.
5. Discussion
Steered by the VAB and TPB models, this study examined how configurations of altruistic values (i.e., environmental consciousness), egoistic values (i.e., health consciousness), and the three central TPB constructs—attitude (ATT), subjective norms (SN), and perceived behavioral control (PBC)—collectively shape meat-eaters’ intentions to purchase PBMAs.
5.1. Findings of PLS-SEM
The principal finding of this paper is the positive influence of values—specifically health consciousness and environmental consciousness—on consumers’ attitudes towards PBMAs, which aligns with prior research [
5,
23,
59]. The PLS-SEM analysis further validated that ATT, SN, and PBC each exert a significant positive effect on consumers’ PBMA purchase intention. These findings are consistent with earlier studies [
10,
20,
26,
27,
68], thereby reinforcing the applicability of the TPB framework in this context.
Notably, this study highlights that subjective norms emerge as the strongest direct predictor of purchase intention towards PBMAs. This suggests that Taiwanese consumers tend to place considerable weight on the opinions and recommendations of others when deciding whether to purchase PBMAs. This finding underscores the significant role of social pressure and perceived expectations in sustainable consumption decisions [
20]. Such a pattern may be deeply influenced by Taiwan’s multicultural context and sociocultural emphasis on interpersonal relationships and collectivist values [
20].
This study also identified perceived behavioral control as a significant predictor of PBMA purchase intention. One possible explanation is that the sample primarily comprised individuals with higher education levels, who may possess greater environmental and health consciousness and feel more empowered to make autonomous decisions, such as choosing PBMAs. This result aligns with findings by Li et al. [
20], which showed that individuals with higher educational attainment demonstrate a greater propensity toward adopting plant-based alternatives like plant-based eggs.
Furthermore, attitude is positively associated with purchase intention. Mediation analyses indicate that attitude partially mediates the relationship between environmental consciousness and purchase intention, while it fully mediates the relationship between health consciousness and purchase intention. These findings are consistent with earlier studies [
10,
20,
26,
27,
68], thereby highlighting the central role of attitudes as a bridge linking personal values to actual behavioral intentions in the context of PBMAs choices.
5.2. Findings of fsQCA
PLS-SEM identified a single optimal model explaining consumers’ purchase intention toward PBMAs. In contrast, fsQCA challenged the PLS-SEM assumption that a single model can capture the behavior of all consumers by identifying six distinct configurations of factors leading to high purchase intention towards PBMAs. These six configurations collectively demonstrated an explanatory power of 93.9%, which is notably higher than the 72.1% explanatory power of the single PLS-SEM model. This finding underscores that a single symmetric model cannot fully account for the diversity of consumer behaviors. Given individual heterogeneity, consumers hold different motivations for purchasing PBMAs, and the fsQCA results more accurately reflect this complexity observed in the real world.
According to the fsQCA results, consumers with low environmental consciousness and health consciousness can still exhibit high PBMA purchase intention when influenced by strong subjective norms (Solution 4). This suggests that emphasizing and enhancing subjective norms should be prioritized to attract consumers who may otherwise lack intrinsic environmental or health motivations. Furthermore, the analysis indicates that consumers with low perceived behavioral control may nonetheless develop high purchase intention towards PBMAs when their environmental consciousness and health consciousness are strongly reinforced (Solution 5). These findings highlight the importance of tailored strategies that leverage different combinations of motivational factors to effectively promote PBMA adoption across diverse consumer segments.
5.3. Findings of NCA
The findings of NCA indicate that environmental consciousness, health consciousness, ATT, SN, and PBC each constitute necessary conditions for the formation of purchase intentions towards PBMAs. Bottleneck analysis further revealed that the relative importance of these factors varies across different levels of purchase intention. Specifically, attitude becomes the most critical factor when purchase intention reaches 80% or higher, whereas its importance diminishes at lower levels (≤70%). At these lower levels, subjective norms become the most influential driver.
These findings challenge the linear perspective offered by PLS-SEM, highlighting that the effects of these variables are non-linear and depend on the extent of purchase intention. Finally, to achieve the highest level of purchase intention (100%), subjective norms are the most decisive factor, followed by perceived behavioral control and attitude.
5.4. Compare and Contrast the Results Obtained from PLS-SEM, fsQCA, and NCA
A comparative analysis of results from PLS-SEM, fsQCA and NCA provides a more comprehensive understanding of consumers’ purchase intention towards PBMAs (see
Table 10). The PLS-SEM analysis identified EC, HC, SN, PBC and ATT as significant predictors of purchase intention. ATT served as a partial mediator between EC and purchase intention and as a full mediator between HC and purchase intention. In contrast, the fsQCA results reveal multiple configurational pathways leading to high purchase intention, demonstrating that no single factor is sufficient in isolation. Rather, distinct combinations—such as high EC and ATT, or strong SN and PBC—can each generate high purchase intention, underscoring the causal asymmetry and complexity of consumer behavior. Complementing these findings, the NCA results show that EC, HC, ATT, SN and PBC are necessary conditions for high purchase intention, each exerting a medium-level effect. Collectively, these results highlight the complementary nature of the three analytical approaches: PLS-SEM elucidates the direct effects and mediation mechanisms, fsQCA uncovers alternative causal configurations, and NCA identifies the minimum conditions essential for high purchase intention.
6. Implications and Recommendations
6.1. Theoretical Implications
The findings of this study yield several significant theoretical implications. Firstly, by integrating the TPB with VAB model, this research advances a more holistic framework for elucidating the intricate interrelationships among key psychological constructs underpinning consumers’ purchase intentions towards PBMAs. Specifically, the study underscores the critical influence of both altruistic values (i.e., environmental consciousness) and egoistic values (i.e., health consciousness) in shaping consumer attitudes, which subsequently influence purchase intentions. This extended theoretical model contributes to the literature by offering a more holistic and nuanced understanding of individual behavior within the domain of sustainable consumption, particularly in the context of PBMAS.
Secondly, the concurrent application of PLS-SEM, fsQCA, and NCA in investigating the factors influencing consumer purchase intentions towards PBMAs enables the identification of both linear and non-linear causal relationships among variables. This multi-method strategy not only strengthens the robustness of the findings but also uncovers novel causal pathways through diverse configurational conditions. As a result, this integrative analytical framework offers a more holistic and nuanced understanding of consumers’ purchase intentions towards PBMAs, thereby contributing meaningfully to the existing literature on consumer behaviour within this context.
6.2. Managerial Implications
The findings of this study yield several managerial implications. Firstly, it is recommended that marketers strategically segment their target audiences according to distinct value orientations and attitudinal dispositions towards PBMAs. Consumers who exhibit high levels of environmental and health consciousness, along with a favorable attitude towards PBMAs, constitute a potentially loyal and engaged market segment. Developing tailored marketing strategies that align with the values and preferences of this group can enhance PBMAs’ message relevance and resonance. This targeted approach is likely to foster more consumer engagement and increase the effectiveness of promotional efforts.
Secondly, the environmental and health benefits of PBMAs have become key drivers of consumer purchasing decisions, contributing significantly to the growing adoption of plant-based diets. To capitalize on this trend, industry stakeholders—such as food service providers and product manufacturers—should consider offering behavioral nudges and transparent product information. For example, food service companies could provide detailed descriptions of PBMA menu items and emphasize the environmental advantages of PBMA production, such as reduced greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, lower water consumption, and decreased land use. Furthermore, the use of labelling that emphasizes sustainability credentials may serve to strengthen consumer trust and exert a positive influence on purchasing behavior.
Thirdly, although demand for PBMAs continues to grow, a substantial proportion of consumers remain unaware of their actual health and environmental benefits. To bridge this informational gap, comprehensive educational and promotional initiatives should be undertaken to raise public awareness and deepen consumer understanding. Such efforts ought to clearly distinguish the production processes of PBMAs from those of conventional meat, while underscoring the associated positive health outcomes and environmental advantages.
Finally, this study identifies multiple, qualitatively distinct configurations of antecedent conditions that are associated with both elevated and diminished levels of purchase intention towards PBMAs, thereby highlighting the complexity and heterogeneity of consumer decision-making in this context. These insights hold significant implications for marketing strategy, as they underscore the importance for marketers and retailers to holistically consider consumer value before formulating targeted approaches. It is recommended that marketers take into account the complex and non-linear configurational effects identified in this research and develop flexible, evidence-informed strategies that align with the diverse and nuanced drivers of consumer purchase intentions towards PBMAs. As psychographic variables, consumer values provide a robust basis for identifying environmentally conscious market segments, thereby enabling more targeted and effective segmentation and positioning strategies.
6.3. Limitations and Future Works
Notwithstanding the valuable contributions of this study, its conclusions should be interpreted with caution owing to several limitations that warrant acknowledgement and further investigation.
Firstly, this study was confined to the Taiwanese market, which may restrict the generalizability of its findings to other cultural and geographical contexts. To enhance external validity and broaden the applicability of the results, future research is encouraged to adopt a more heterogeneous sampling strategy encompassing consumers from a range of regions or countries. Such an approach would facilitate cross-cultural comparisons and yield a more holistic understanding of consumer behavior towards PBMAs across diverse socio-cultural contexts.
Secondly, the use of a cross-sectional design constrains the capacity to infer causal relationships in the development of PBMA purchasing behavior. To address this limitation, future research is advised to adopt a longitudinal design in order to capture temporal changes in consumer values, attitudes, and behaviors. Such an approach would offer deeper insights into the causal mechanisms underlying PBMA adoption and allow for the observation of dynamic behavioral shifts in response to evolving social, environmental, or market factors.
Thirdly, the use of a convenience sampling method may limit the representativeness of the study’s findings. To enhance generalizability, future works should adopt more rigorous sampling methods, such as stratified sampling, to ensure that key subgroups are adequately represented based on relevant demographic or behavioral characteristics.
Fourthly, only data from meat-eaters were collected from this study, so the generalizability of the findings is limited as it only exhibits the viewpoints and purchase intentions of meat-eaters. The results cannot be generalized for non-meat consumers from different cultures; thus, future studies should investigate more diverse cultures. It is suggested that future studies survey different cultures’ consumers and perform comparison analyses or multigroup analyses.
Finally, although the study relied on self-reported behavioral intentions—which may not fully reflect actual purchasing behavior—it nevertheless offers valuable and highly relevant insights. Future research should therefore examine real consumption patterns to address the gap between stated intentions and observable consumer actions.
7. Conclusions
This study seeks to investigate the intricate pathways underpinning consumers’ PBMA purchase intentions in Taiwan by using a hybrid methodological approach of PLS-SEM, fsQCA, and NCA. In doing so, it addresses critical gaps in the current understanding of consumer decision-making related to plant-based dietary choices. From a theoretical perspective, the integration of the TPB and VAB model advances existing knowledge by capturing complex, configurational patterns of behavioral intention and challenging the limitations of conventional linear frameworks. Methodologically, the integrated application of PLS-SEM, fsQCA, and NCA provides a rigorous and nuanced analytical framework for investigating sustainable consumption behaviors. Practically, the findings provide an evidence-based foundation upon which industry stakeholders can devise more effective marketing and strategic interventions to promote PBMA consumption.