Next Article in Journal
Metabolomics and Sensory Evaluation Reveal the Aroma and Taste Profile of Northern Guangdong Black Tea
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Texture-Modified Meat and Thickened Soup Combination for Oral Dysphagia Patients with Uniform Firmness and Solid Appearance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Consumer Acceptability of Various Gluten-Free Scones with Rice, Buckwheat, Black Rice, Brown Rice, and Oat Flours

Department of Food & Nutrition, College of Biomedical and Health Science, Konkuk University, Chungju 27478, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2025, 14(14), 2464; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14142464
Submission received: 21 May 2025 / Revised: 2 July 2025 / Accepted: 10 July 2025 / Published: 14 July 2025

Abstract

Due to consumer needs and the prevalence of gluten-related disorders such as celiac disease, the gluten-free food market is expanding rapidly and is expected to surpass USD 2.4 billion by 2036. The objective of this study was to substitute wheat flour with oat, black rice, brown rice, buckwheat, and rice flours in the production of gluten-free scones, to assess consumer acceptability, and to identify factors contributing to consumer acceptability using check-all-that-apply questions. The 10 attributes of appearance, color, texture, grainy flavor, sweetness, familiar flavor, novelty, familiarity, moistness, and consistency exhibited statistically significant differences among the samples (p < 0.001). One hundred consumers evaluated 18 attributes using a nine-point hedonic scale, and all attributes demonstrated statistically significant differences across six samples (p < 0.001). The samples from buckwheat and wheat scored the highest in consumer acceptability. The results indicate a strong positive correlation between overall liking and purchase intention, with sensory attributes such as nutty flavor, cohesiveness, appearance, moistness, color, texture, and inner softness positively influencing consumer acceptability. The attributes affecting negatively were thick throat sensation, unique flavor, and stuffiness. This study is expected to provide data to aid in the development of better-tasting gluten-free products that meet customer and market needs.

1. Introduction

Gluten is a structural protein formed by combining gliadin and glutenin in certain grains such as wheat, barley, and rye [1]. It plays a crucial role in creating desirable textures and volumes in baked products by holding carbon dioxide and binding other ingredients [2,3]. Wheat flour, which predominantly contains gluten, is primarily used as a key ingredient in everyday foods due to these critical functionalities.
However, celiac disease, an immune-related systemic disorder, is known to cause inflammation in the small intestine’s mucosal cells due to gluten, damaging the villi and resulting in malabsorption and atopy [1]. The demand for and production of gluten-free products are on the rise, not only because of celiac disease but also due to conditions like gluten ataxia, dermatitis herpetiformis, and wheat-related allergies [4]. The gluten-free food market is projected to expand at an annual rate of 9.8%, surpassing USD 800 million in 2023 and expected to exceed USD 2.4 billion by 2036 [5]. Nonetheless, gluten-free products remain less accessible to consumers due to their rarity and high costs. The ingredients commonly used in gluten-free products, such as oats, buckwheat, quinoa, and brown rice, typically contain higher levels of fiber and minerals than those in wheat-based products. Buckwheat, highly researched for its use in gluten-free products, contains phytochemicals named rutin and quercetin, which may have functional activities. Currently, it is very difficult to replace natural proteins that have similar rheological properties to those of gluten because gluten plays a crucial role in the essential viscoelastic properties for the texture and taste of bakery products. Therefore, acceptable and affordable gluten-free bakery products are scarce due to challenges in achieving the appropriate texture and volume [3]. To address these issues, ongoing research aims to enhance the quality and development of gluten-free bakery products like cookies, crackers, biscuits, and breads [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14].
Originating in England, a scone is a type of quick bread made with butter, milk, egg, and sugar, leavened swiftly using baking powder without a fermentation process [10,15]. Due to this rapid preparation process and convenience, the consumption of scones as a meal substitute is steadily increasing in Republic of Korea, with various ingredients incorporated to enhance the flavor and health benefits [8]. Consequently, numerous studies have aimed to substitute wheat flour, the primary ingredient in scones, with gluten-free alternatives such as rice flour, oatmeal, and almond powder. Additionally, research to enhance functionality or taste by incorporating other ingredients has also been explored [10,15,16,17,18,19].
Check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions are a popular sensory evaluation technique that rapidly and easily collects sensory information from consumers, introduced in 2007 to gauge consumer perceptions of products [20,21,22,23]. CATA questions comprise a list of sensory terms and attributes from which panelists select all that they consider applicable to each sample [24,25]. Although the CATA technique involves simple and limitless multiple-choice questions for identifying relevant sensory attributes, the results are highly reliable for understanding the consumer acceptability of products and their profiles, similarly to those obtained from descriptive analyses conducted by trained panelists [26]. Previous studies on gluten-free bakery products have evaluated sensory attributes using a small panel of 7~30 participants [6,8,9,10,11]. Di Cairano et al. [20] assessed both experimental and commercial gluten-free biscuits for acceptability and sensory profiles using CATA questions.
In this study, we used gluten-free flours such as oat, black rice, brown rice, buckwheat, and rice flours for making gluten-free scones and identified factors contributing to consumer acceptability using CATA questions with 100 consumers. The purpose of this study is to assess whether flours from gluten-free flours, usable as gluten-free ingredients, evaluate their potential based on the product’s sensory qualities. Our research could serve as foundational information for developing more palatable and consumer-acceptable gluten-free bakery products and is expected to aid in ongoing future research.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The experiment used the following materials: wheat flour (CJ Jeiljedang, Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea), oat flour (Canadian oats milling, Duagh, AB, Canada), black rice flour (Green natural, Jindo, Jeollanam-do, Republic of Korea), brown rice flour (Color food, Anyang, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea), buckwheat flour (Bongpyeongmemil, Pyeongchang, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea), rice flour (Daedu, Gunsan, Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea), non-salted butter (Anchor, Sturgeon, Auckland, New Zealand), white sugar (Samyang, Ulsan, Republic of Korea), milk (Seoul Milk, Seoul, Republic of Korea), fine sea salt (CJ Jeiljedang, Sinan, Jeollanam-do, Republic of Korea), baking powder (Pungjeon, Incheon, Republic of Korea), and egg (Mokdong Farm, Yeongju, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Republic of Korea). The five types of flour selected for the gluten-free scones experiment were based on prior studies and are commonly used in Republic of Korean bakery products [10,13,16,17,18,19]. These 12 materials were purchased online “https://www.coupang.com (accessed on 12 September 2024)”.

2.2. Preparation of Samples

The experimental design of this study was informed by prior gluten-free bakery research [10,16,17,18,19,20]. Scone baking trials were carried out in a laboratory, and processes such as dough mixing, processing, and baking were conducted using laboratory equipment. Six types of scones were prepared: one control sample using original wheat flour, and five gluten-free variants using different flours (oat, black rice, brown rice, buckwheat, and rice flours). The mixing ratio and method were based on previous studies and preliminary experiments [10,16,17,18,19]. Preliminary tests used a recipe from prior related research to prepare wheat-flour scones, which were then evaluated. The composition and mixing ratio for the scones in this study were determined from several preliminary tests and are detailed in Table 1. The dry ingredients (flour, sugar, baking powder, and salt) were combined and sieved. Butter pieces were incorporated into the dry mixture until the mixture resembled large, coarse crumbs the size of small peas, using a food processor. Milk and eggs were added to moisten the dry ingredients. The dough was kneaded gently a few times until cohesive, then wrapped and left to rest in the refrigerator for 1 h. After resting, the dough was rolled out and the scones were cut into a square (4 cm × 5 cm), approximately 2 cm thick, placed on a baking pan, and baked in an oven (iCombi Pro, Rational, Berlin, Germany) at 180 °C for 15 min. The scones were then cooled, wrapped in plastic bags, and presented to consumers for sensory testing.

2.3. Consumer Test: Consumer Acceptability and CATA

The consumer testing of scones involved 100 consumers (females: 65, males: 35, age: 20~60 years) from the Chungju area (Chungcheongbuk-do, Republic of Korea). Participants were recruited using school bulletin boards, bulletin boards of public institutions, and websites of community. In terms of age, 30 participants were in their 20s, 20 in their 30s, 28 in their 40s, and 22 in their 50s. Participants were not required to have prior experience in sensory testing, but they should not have had any aversions to eating scones or allergies to any of the ingredients. This study received approval from the Institutional Review Board of Konkuk University (7001355-202405-HR-794).
All samples were served in a white paper dish (10 cm in diameter) with strawberry jam (Ottogi, Anyang, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea) accompanied by drinking water to cleanse their mouths between samples and minimize residual effects. These samples, coded with random three-digit numbers, were issued using a Latin square design [21]. The test comprised two consumer evaluations: the first assessed consumer acceptability for 15 attributes on a 9-point structured hedonic scale (1= dislike extremely; 5 = neither like nor dislike; 9 = like extremely) and 3 attributes on a 9-point scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 9 (strongly agree). The consumer acceptability test targeted various attributes including overall_liking, appearance, inner color of scone, color, overall_taste, sweet taste, texture, savory taste, aroma/smell, aftertaste, flavor, softness, moistness, cohesiveness, outer crispiness, purchasing intention, recommendation, and familiarity.
The second assessment involved CATA questions where consumer panels selected terms that best described their tasting experiences. The drivers of liking for the CATA questions were derived from previous studies and a professional focus group [3,15,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. The drivers of liking comprised 29 terms, including appearance, color, size, texture, harmonious pairing with jam, savory flavor, grainy flavor, unique flavor, oily, sweet, salty, familiar flavor, harmony of ingredients, convenient to eat, newness, traditional, unique texture, familiar, cohesiveness, outer crispy, inner color, nutty flavor, stuffy, crumbly, moist, healthy, thick throat feeling, residual sensation in the mouth, and others.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was utilized to compare consumer acceptability among the samples, establishing a significant difference threshold at p < 0.05. Following the detection of significant differences, Tukey’s multiple range test was applied as a post hoc analysis. A frequency analysis was performed to calculate the frequency of consumers’ answers to the CATA questionnaire. Chi-squared and Fisher’s exact tests were conducted to confirm the significance between samples. A correspondence analysis (CA) elucidated the relationship between the six samples and sensory terms evaluated by CATA, while partial least squares regression (PLSR) was employed to determine the association between the sensory terms assessed by CATA and consumer acceptability. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science, ver. 25.0, Chicago, IL, USA) and XLSTAT 2024.8 (Addinsoft, Paris, France).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Frequency of Sensory Characteristics and Correspondence Analysis of Six Scone Samples by CATA

Table 2 presents the frequency of 29 sensory terms for gluten-free scones based on CATA questions. Ten of those terms—appearance, color, texture, grainy flavor, sweetness, familiar flavor, newness, familiarity, and moistness—showed significant differences among samples (p < 0.001). Scones with wheat and rice flour were frequently chosen for their appearance, color, familiarity, and moistness compared to other varieties. The scone made with wheat flour exhibited the highest frequencies in texture, savory flavor, harmonious ingredient blend, familiarity, and moistness. This result indicates that consumers are more familiar with bakery products made from wheat flour. Additionally, the presence of gluten in wheat flour significantly influences the texture and quality of the bakery products from a sensory standpoint [28]. As illustrated in Figure 1, wheat and rice scones, similar in appearance and color to commercial scones, had higher frequencies in appearance, color, and familiarity attributes than others did. The black rice scone, distinguished by its color, appeared to have a high frequency of the ‘newness’ term. Furthermore, the black rice scone had the highest frequency of a ‘healthy’ attribute among the six scones, reflecting the perception that colored foods are positively correlated with health. However, the rest of the sensory characteristics had the lowest frequencies, indicating that the black color of the scone did not have a positive effect on the evaluation of the other organoleptic sensations.
The correspondence analysis visually represented the sensory characteristics and sample distribution (Figure 2). The CA biplot explained 59.37% of the variance with Dim 1 and 18.89% with Dim 2, accounting for a total variance of 78.27%. Black rice, brown rice, and oat scone samples were positioned in the positive direction of Dim 1, influencing attributes such as crispiness, unique flavor, texture, cohesiveness, stuffiness, savory flavor, and grainy flavor. Conversely, wheat, rice, and buckwheat scone samples were located in the negative direction of Dim 1, affecting attributes such as moistness, oiliness, familiarity, texture, appearance, color, and harmonic ingredients. The attributes of texture, familiarity, appearance, color, and harmonic ingredients nearly coincided with wheat and rice scone samples. These scone samples exhibited high frequencies in appearance, color, and familiarity as noted in Table 2, indicating a close association with these attributes.

3.2. Consumer Acceptability

Table 3 presents the results of the consumer acceptability test for gluten-free scones. Consumer panels evaluated the attributes of overall liking, appearance, inner color of scones, color, overall taste, sweet taste, texture, savory taste, aroma/smell, aftertaste, flavor, softness, moistness, cohesiveness, outer crispiness, purchasing intention, recommendation, and familiarity using a 9-point hedonic scale. All attributes of the consumer acceptability test were significantly different among six samples (p < 0.001). Buckwheat and wheat scone samples had the highest consumer acceptability. The buckwheat scone sample was rated higher in acceptability of overall liking, inner color, overall taste, texture, savory flavor, sweet flavor, flavor, aroma/smell, softness, moistness, cohesiveness, outer crispiness, purchase intention, recommendation, and familiarity than that of wheat. The wheat scone sample showed the highest consumer acceptability for appearance, color, and aftertaste attributes. This result indicates that consumers are familiar with the appearance and color of scones made with wheat flour. In terms of appearance, the rice scone sample was judged to be the most similar to a regular wheat scone. Rice flour is the most widely replaced for wheat flour to make gluten-free products because it has little effect on the color and flavor of the product [28]. However, the results of our study showed that the attributes of the rice scone, except for appearance, were rated lower than those for buckwheat, black rice, and brown rice scones. The buckwheat scone sample attracted higher scores of consumer acceptability in terms of savory flavor, softness, and moistness than those of a regular wheat scone. Despite its unfavorable color, the black rice scone scored higher in consumer acceptability than the oat and brown rice scones. Healthy consumers choose gluten-free products based on emotional and psychological factors because they perceived black-colored foods as healthy [29]. Conversely, the oat scone sample had the lowest scores for consumer acceptability. The consumer acceptability of oat scone received lowest scores in color, savory taste, and textures such as softness, moistness, and outer crispness. Gluten-free bakery products usually tend to have dark colors and a hard texture because of a complex formulation [30]. The study of oat-based gluten-free cookies presents that there was a correlation between the chewing effort and low consumer acceptability [9]. The selection of bakery products is influenced by their appearance and texture in the mouth. As the demand for gluten-free products increases, gluten-free bakery products are being created from various gluten-free flours such as rice, sorghum, amaranth, corn, buckwheat, quinoa, and chickpea [12,18,31,32]. Buckwheat is one of the most commonly used ingredients in gluten-free bakery products in numerous studies because it is rich in nutrients including amino acids and polyphenols such as rutin [6,7,8,11,12,13,31,32,33].
Our findings align with previous studies by Dapčcević Hadnađev et al. [7], who examined the effect of substituting rice flour with buckwheat flour on the rheological properties and quality of cookies. They observed that cookies enriched with buckwheat flour were rated with higher overall acceptability than those made with rice flour. Additionally, they noted that cookies with buckwheat flour scored higher for pleasant smell and taste. Similarly, Sakač et al. [8] investigated the antioxidant capacity, mineral content, and sensory properties of gluten-free cookies made by substituting rice flour with buckwheat flour at levels of 10, 20, and 30%. Their findings indicated that cookies containing 20 and 30% buckwheat flour exhibited more favorable sensory properties (color and odor) compared to those with 0 and 10% buckwheat flour. Sedej et al. [6] also conducted a quality assessment of gluten-free crackers using buckwheat flour, comparing refined and wholegrain wheat and buckwheat crackers. They found that refined buckwheat crackers scored the highest in terms of appearance (shape, uniformity, surface), texture (structure, break, firmness), chewiness, and taste out of the four samples. Conversely, Joung et al. [13] studied the effect of wheat and six gluten-free flours (brown rice, buckwheat, corn, sorghum, teff, and black rice) on cookie quality, employing a consumer preference test to evaluate sensory properties including crust color, top grain, flavor, softness, sweetness, and overall preference. The buckwheat cookies received the lowest scores for overall preference and flavor, whereas black rice scones received the highest scores among the evaluations.

3.3. Relationships Between Sensory Attributes by CATA and Consumer Acceptability of Six Scones

PLSR analysis was conducted to identify the relationship between sensory attributes by CATA and consumer acceptability of the samples. Figure 3 illustrates the relationship between sensory attributes by CATA and consumer acceptability of six scone samples. PLSR analysis is commonly utilized to clearly and visually depict relationships between two types of data [34,35,36]. We conducted an examination to derive the sensory characteristics of CATA that significantly influence consumer acceptability by applying the PLSR analysis. The results show a high positive (+) correlation between overall liking and purchase intention, with sensory attributes such as nutty flavor, cohesiveness, appearance, moistness, color, texture, and inner softness positively affecting acceptability. Attributes negatively affecting acceptability included thick throat feeling, unique flavor, and stuffiness. The black rice scone sample was closely associated with unique flavor, newness, crumbly texture, unique texture, and stuffiness. While scones are usually ivory or yellow in color, the black color of the scone due to the black rice was evaluated as a ‘newness’ factor, compared to a traditional scone. It is believed that these results correlate with the low consumer acceptability of the black rice scone sample. The oat scone sample was associated with a crumbly texture, residual sensation in the mouth, and grainy flavor, resulting in the lowest consumer acceptability. Conversely, the buckwheat and brown rice scone samples demonstrated high consumer acceptability due to positive attributes such as nutty flavor, cohesiveness, color, texture, overall liking, and overall taste. The study of buckwheat flour cookies from Dapčcević Hadnađev et al. [7] indicated sensory attributes contributing to higher consumer acceptability included the pleasant smell and taste of buckwheat cookies. In particular, Republic of Korean consumers prefer the ‘nutty flavor’ and perceive it as a positive sensory characteristic [34,35]. Sedej et al. [6] also demonstrated that consumer acceptability is influenced by the appearance and texture of gluten-free crackers made with buckwheat flour.

4. Conclusions

Gluten-free scones made with oat, black rice, brown rice, buckwheat, and rice flours were developed, and consumer acceptability was determined using CATA questions. Our results demonstrate the potential application of gluten-free flours in bakery products based on sensory properties. Buckwheat flour offers the highest potential for the production of gluten-free scones. Despite the growing need and demand for gluten-free products, there are limited gluten-free products that meet consumers’ expectation, and there is a lack of evaluation studies on appropriate and sufficient sensory characteristics and quality measures of gluten-free products. The results of this study are expected to provide fundamental data to aid in the development of better-tasting gluten-free products that meet consumer and market needs.
However, this study has some limitations. First, the gender imbalance in our study, which had more female than male participants, may affect how representative our findings are of the general population. In future studies, we will consider a more equal gender balance when recruiting participants. Second, we could not examine the physicochemical characteristics of gluten-free scones because our study was focused on substituting wheat flour with gluten-free flours and examining consumer responses using CATA question-based consumer testing. Substituting gluten-free flour for regular wheat flour in commercial products remains a challenge because gluten-free products generally scored lower for texture, taste, and consumer acceptability than those containing gluten. Furthermore, commercial gluten-free products tend to be more expensive. A significant challenge is developing technologies that can substitute affordable gluten-free products for gluten-containing ones while maintaining a similar texture and quality to meet consumer expectation and market demands. Continuous studies aimed at improving the quality of gluten-free products, such as adding hydrocolloids, protein isolates, gums, and modifying the flour, are ongoing. Additionally, it is essential to explore various gluten-free flours from plant materials with nutritional and functional ingredients and assess their consumer acceptability to satisfy consumer requirements.
Therefore, further research will be conducted to examine the nutritional quality, physicochemical characteristics, and sensory characteristics of gluten-free bakery products based on the result of this study.

Author Contributions

J.C. and S.S.: conceptualization, J.C., J.Y. and S.S.: methodology, J.C. and S.S.: software, J.C., S.K. and S.J.: validation, J.Y., S.K. and S.S.: formal analysis, J.C. and S.K.: investigation, J.Y. and S.J.: writing—original draft preparation, J.C. and S.J.: writing—review and editing, J.C., J.Y. and S.J.: visualization, S.S. and S.J.: supervision, J.C.: project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Konkuk University in 2023.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted with the approval of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Konkuk University (IRB approval number: 7001355-202405-HR-794. IRB approval date: 23 September 2024).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this article are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Di Cairano, M.; Galgano, F.; Tolve, R.; Caruso, M.C.; Condelli, N. Focus on gluten free biscuits: Ingredients and issues. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 81, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Drabińska, N.; Zieliński, H.; Krupa-Kozak, U. Technological benefits of inulin type fructans application in gluten-free products—A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 56, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hassan, H.F.; Mourad, L.; Khatib, N.; Assi, R.; Akil, S.; Khatib, S.E.; Hteit, R. Perceptions towards gluten free products among consumers: A narrative review. Appl. Food Res. 2024, 4, 100441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Capriles, V.D.; Valéria de Aguiar, E.; Garcia dos Santos, F.; Marión Fernandez, E.A.; Guedes de Melo, B.; Tagliapietra, B.L.; Scarton, M.; Pedrosa Silva Clerici, M.T.; Conti, A.C. Current status and future prospects of sensory and consumer research approaches to gluten-free bakery and pasta products. Food Res. Int. 2023, 173, 113389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Research Nester. Gluten-Free Food Market Overview. 2024. Available online: https://www.researchnester.com/kr/reports/gluten-free-food-market/5362 (accessed on 12 December 2024).
  6. Sedej, I.; Sakač, M.; Mandić, A.; Mišan, A.; Pestorić, M.; Šimurina, O.; Čanadanović-Brunet, J. Quality assessment of gluten-free crackers based on buckwheat flour. LWT–Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 694–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dapčević Hadnađev, T.R.; Torbica, A.M.; Hadnađev, M.S. Influence of buckwheat flour and carboxymethyl cellulose on rheological behaviour and baking performance of gluten-free cookie dough. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013, 6, 1770–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sakač, M.; Pestorić, M.; Mišan, A.; Nedeljković, N.; Jambrec, D.; Jovanoc, P.; Banjac, V.; Torbica, A.; Hadnađev, M.; Mandić, A. Antioxidant Capacity, Mineral Content and Sensory Properties of Gluten-Free Rice and Buckwheat Cookies. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2015, 53, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Duta, D.E.; Culetu, A. Evaluation of rheological, physicochemical, thermal, mechanical and sensory properties of oat-based gluten free cookies. J. Food Eng. 2015, 162, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Choi, O.J.; Jung, H.N. Effects of fats and oils on the quality characteristics of rice scone. Korean J. Food Preserv. 2019, 26, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kaur, M.; Sandhu, K.S.; Arora, A.P.; Sharma, A. Gluten free biscuits prepared from buckwheat flour by incorporation of various gums: Physicochemical and sensory properties. LWT–Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 62, 628–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Burešová, I.; Tokár, M.; Mareček, J.; Hřivna, L.; Faměra, O.; Šottníková, V. The comparison of the effect of added amaranth, buckwheat, chickpea, maize, millet and quinoa flour on rice dough rheological characteristics, textural and sensory quality of bread. J. Cereal Sci. 2017, 75, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Joung, K.Y.; Song, K.Y.; O, H.; Zhang, Y.; Shin, S.Y.; Kim, Y.S. Effect of Various Gluten-free Flours on Quality Characteristics and Antioxidant Activities of Cookies. Korean J. Food Cook. Sci. 2017, 33, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Vega, D.M.; Florencia Versino, F.; Dini, C.; Sonia Zulma Vina, S.Z.; García, M.A. Gluten-free baked products formulated with Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) flour. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2024, 36, 100946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lee, S.L.; Joo, S.Y. Effects of premature mandarin powder on the quality characteristics and antioxidant activities of scone. Korean J. Food Preserv. 2021, 28, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Choi, H.K.; Lee, H.J.; Ryu, S.I.; Paik, J.K. Quality Characteristics of Rice Scones Added with Spinach Powder as a Meal Substitute for Rice Utilization. Culin. Sci. Hosp. Res. 2023, 29, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lee, H.J.; Ryu, S.I.; Paik, J.K. Quality and Characteristics of Scone Added with Pinus koraiensis Leaf Powder. Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2023, 28, 353–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lim, H.W.; Kim, S.Y.; Kim, E.J.; Choi, S.H.; Joo, S.Y. Physicochemical properties of scones added with Litsea japonica fruit powder. Korean J. Food Preserv. 2022, 29, 1128–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, J.; Kim, J.S. Optimization of Scone Added with Extracted Peach Liquied. Culin. Sci. Hosp. Res. 2019, 25, 145–151. [Google Scholar]
  20. Di Cairano, M.; Condelli, N.; Galgano, F.; Caruso, M.C. Experimental gluten-free biscuits with underexploited flours versus commercial products: Preference pattern and sensory characterisation by Check All That Apply Questionnaire. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 57, 1936–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bi, J.; Kuesten, C. Product effect size estimation and performance accuracy (validity and reliability) assessment for CATA and TCATA data. Food Qual. Prefer. 2025, 127, 105441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Javier-Pisco, P.; Escriche, I.; Igual, M.; García-Segovia, P.; Pagan, M.J. Evaluation of consumer perception of new aquaculture products through applying focus group and check-all-that-apply methodologies. Foods 2024, 13, 2480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Llobell, F.; Bonnet, L.; Giacalone, D. Assessment of panel performance in CATA and RATA experiment. J. Sens. Stud. 2024, 39, e12941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Llobell, F.; Cariou, V.; Vigneau, E.; Labenne, A.; Qannari, E.M. A new approach for the analysis of data and the clustering of subjects in a CATA experiment. Food Qual. Prefer. 2019, 72, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kim, M.; Heo, J.; Kwak, H.S. Comparison of sensory profiles by two different check-all-that-apply (CATA) terms developed from trained panelists and naïve consumers. Food Qual. Prefer. 2023, 109, 104902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, S.; Ng, K.H.; Yee, K.H.; Tang, Y.; Meng, R.; He, W. Comparison of pivot profile, CATA, and pivot-CATA for the sensory profiling of instant black coffee. Food Qual. Prefer. 2023, 108, 104858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pramudya, R.C.; Seo, H. Using Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) method for determining product temperature-dependent sensory-attribute variations: A case study of cooked rice. Food Res. Int. 2018, 105, 724–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Fernandes Almeida, R.; Aguiar Borges, L.; Anacleto, D.; Nunes de Souza, M.S.; Magalhães da Silva, L.B.; Monroy, Y.M.; Augusto Caldas Batista, E.; Paula Oliveira Machado, A. Gluten-free cookies: A comprehensive review of substitutes for wheat flour. Food Humanit. 2025, 4, 100549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zerbini, C.; De Canio, F.; Martinelli, E.; Luceri, B. Are gluten-free products healthy for non-celiac consumers? How the perception of well-being moderates gluten-free addiction. Food Qual. Prefer. 2024, 118, 105183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, W.; Li, Y. Advanced properties of gluten-free cookies, cakes, and crackers: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 103, 200–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cayres, C.A.; Ascheri, J.L.R.; Peixoto Gimenes Couto, M.A.; Almeida, E.L.; Melo, L. Consumers’ acceptance of optimized gluten-free sorghum-based cakes and their drivers of liking and disliking. J. Cereal Sci. 2020, 93, 102938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dogruer, I.; Baser, F.; Gulec, S.; Tokatli, F.; Ozen, B. Formulation of gluten free cookies utilizing chickpea, carob, and hazelnut flours through mixture design. Foods 2023, 12, 3689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kim, M.J.; Kim, S.B.; Choi, A.J.; Lee, Y.Y.; Choe, J.S. Antioxidant Activity and Functional Components of Germinated Oats according to the Sprout Length. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 8, 1337–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gwak, M.J.; Chung, S.J.; Kim, Y. Sensory drivers of liking for Adlay (Coix lacryma-jobi) tea. Korean J. Food Cult. 2012, 27, 512–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hwang, S.H.; Hong, J.H. Determining the most influential sensory attributes of nuttiness in soymilk: A trial with Korean consumers using model soymilk. J. Sens. Stud. 2015, 30, 425–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kwon, Y.; Ryu, J.; Ju, S. Sensory Attributes of Buckwheat Jelly (Memilmuk) with Mung Bean Starch Added to Improve Texture and Taste. Foods 2021, 10, 2860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Scones with different flours (the scones should be about 4 cm wide, 5 cm long, and 2 cm thick).
Figure 1. Scones with different flours (the scones should be about 4 cm wide, 5 cm long, and 2 cm thick).
Foods 14 02464 g001
Figure 2. Correspondence analysis of six scone samples using 29 sensory attributes by CATA (1). Columns (•) mean attributes, rows (■) samples. (1) CATA, check-all-that-apply.
Figure 2. Correspondence analysis of six scone samples using 29 sensory attributes by CATA (1). Columns (•) mean attributes, rows (■) samples. (1) CATA, check-all-that-apply.
Foods 14 02464 g002
Figure 3. Results of PLSR (1) analysis between sensory attributes (•) by CATA and consumer acceptability (▲) of six scone samples (■). (1) PLSR, partial least squares regression analysis.
Figure 3. Results of PLSR (1) analysis between sensory attributes (•) by CATA and consumer acceptability (▲) of six scone samples (■). (1) PLSR, partial least squares regression analysis.
Foods 14 02464 g003
Table 1. Composition and mixing ration of scones.
Table 1. Composition and mixing ration of scones.
Ingredient (Ratio)Composition (g)
WheatRiceBuckwheatBlack RiceBrown RiceOat
Flour (47%)150150150150150150
Sugar (9.5%)303030303030
Salt (0.3%)111111
Baking powder (1.6%)555555
Butter (16%)505050505050
Whole egg (9.5%)303030303030
Milk (16%)505050505050
Table 2. Results for sensory attributes by CATA (1) of six scone samples (n = 100).
Table 2. Results for sensory attributes by CATA (1) of six scone samples (n = 100).
Wheat
(n = 100)
Rice
(n = 100)
Buckwheat
(n = 100)
Black Rice
(n = 100)
Brown Rice
(n = 100)
Oat
(n = 100)
p-Value (2)
nnnnnn
Appearance555635112428<0.001
Color616140153328<0.001
Size4343272427260.003
Texture482522141910<0.001
Harmonious pairing with jam4141182531260.001
Savory flavor4430211937330.001
Grainy flavor61115163026<0.001
Unique flavor75511650.477
Oily42-1130.304
Sweet18204977<0.001
Salty4422330.927
Familiar flavor2725641313<0.001
Harmony of ingredients15773550.019
Convenient to eat2479101060.001
Newness2432266<0.001
Traditional4848750.670
Unique texture3757570.777
Familiar33291181413<0.001
Cohesiveness4495620.317
Outer crispy3217230.182
Inner color91332350.005
Nutty flavor559415110.030
Stuffy32-9360.017
Moist32209576<0.001
Crumbly2455230.729
Healthy1817253326280.074
Thick throat feeling4526350.744
Residual sensation in the mouth1526760.231
Others2112-20.771
(1) CATA, check-all-that-apply; (2) p-value by Fisher’s exact test.
Table 3. Consumer acceptability of six scone samples using the 9-point hedonic scale.
Table 3. Consumer acceptability of six scone samples using the 9-point hedonic scale.
Wheat
(n = 100)
Rice
(n = 100)
Buckwheat
(n = 100)
Black Rice
(n = 100)
Brown Rice
(n = 100)
Oat
(n = 100)
p-Value (1)
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
Overall liking6.56 (2)a1.314.92 bc0.986.72 a1.685.16 bc1.035.17 b1.034.42 c0.74<0.001
Appearance7.77 a1.556.08 bc1.226.95 ab1.745.39 c1.085.80 bc1.164.09 d0.68<0.001
Inner color7.00 a1.405.83 b1.177.01 a1.755.54 b1.115.84 b1.174.14 c0.69<0.001
Color7.11 a1.425.89 b1.187.06 a1.415.67 b1.135.97 b1.193.98 c0.66<0.001
Overall taste6.40 a1.284.81 b0.966.78 a1.365.20 b1.044.90 b0.984.50 b0.75<0.001
Texture6.12 a1.224.98 b1.006.51 a1.305.08 b1.024.62 b0.924.59 b0.76<0.001
Savory flavor6.12 ab1.224.94 c0.996.47 a1.085.95 ab1.195.49 bc1.104.88 c0.81<0.001
Sweet taste6.07 a1.214.72 bc0.946.20 a1.035.39 b1.084.94 bc0.994.34 c0.72<0.001
Aftertaste6.16 a1.234.45 c0.896.10 a1.025.27 b1.054.69 bc0.944.15 c0.69<0.001
Flavor6.08 a1.224.55 bc0.916.36 a1.065.27 b1.054.89 bc0.984.46 c0.74<0.001
Aroma/smell6.21 a1.245.00 b1.006.49 a1.085.52 b1.104.82 b0.964.95 b0.82<0.001
Softness5.98 b1.204.57 c0.916.63 a1.114.77 c0.954.73 c0.954.51 c0.75<0.001
Moist5.82 b1.944.78 c0.966.53 a1.094.68 c0.944.55 c0.914.35 c0.73<0.001
Cohesiveness5.65 ab1.885.09 bc1.025.92 a0.994.88 c0.984.61 c0.924.75 c0.79<0.001
Outer crispy5.13 ab1.714.76 bc0.955.73 a0.964.56 bc0.914.24 c0.854.21 c0.70<0.001
Purchase intention6.04 (3)a2.014.32 bc0.866.58 a1.104.79 b0.964.42 bc0.883.66 c0.61<0.001
Recommendation5.93 (3)a1.984.08 bc0.826.34 a1.064.60 b0.924.21 bc0.843.46 c0.58<0.001
Familiarity5.90 (3)a1.974.24 b0.856.50 a1.084.67 b0.934.47 b0.893.33 c0.56<0.001
(1) p-value by one-way Anova. (2) 1 = Dislike extremely; 5 = Neither like nor dislike; 9 = Like extremely. (3) 1 = Disagree strongly; 5 = Neither agree nor disagree; 9 = Agree strongly. a–d Indicates significant differences between the samples for each attribute by Tukey’s multiple range comparison at α = 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chae, J.; Kim, S.; Yeon, J.; Shin, S.; Ju, S. Consumer Acceptability of Various Gluten-Free Scones with Rice, Buckwheat, Black Rice, Brown Rice, and Oat Flours. Foods 2025, 14, 2464. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14142464

AMA Style

Chae J, Kim S, Yeon J, Shin S, Ju S. Consumer Acceptability of Various Gluten-Free Scones with Rice, Buckwheat, Black Rice, Brown Rice, and Oat Flours. Foods. 2025; 14(14):2464. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14142464

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chae, Jihyuk, Sukyung Kim, Jeok Yeon, Sohui Shin, and Seyoung Ju. 2025. "Consumer Acceptability of Various Gluten-Free Scones with Rice, Buckwheat, Black Rice, Brown Rice, and Oat Flours" Foods 14, no. 14: 2464. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14142464

APA Style

Chae, J., Kim, S., Yeon, J., Shin, S., & Ju, S. (2025). Consumer Acceptability of Various Gluten-Free Scones with Rice, Buckwheat, Black Rice, Brown Rice, and Oat Flours. Foods, 14(14), 2464. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14142464

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop