Consumer Acceptability of Various Gluten-Free Scones with Rice, Buckwheat, Black Rice, Brown Rice, and Oat Flours
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.2. Preparation of Samples
2.3. Consumer Test: Consumer Acceptability and CATA
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Frequency of Sensory Characteristics and Correspondence Analysis of Six Scone Samples by CATA
3.2. Consumer Acceptability
3.3. Relationships Between Sensory Attributes by CATA and Consumer Acceptability of Six Scones
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Di Cairano, M.; Galgano, F.; Tolve, R.; Caruso, M.C.; Condelli, N. Focus on gluten free biscuits: Ingredients and issues. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 81, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drabińska, N.; Zieliński, H.; Krupa-Kozak, U. Technological benefits of inulin type fructans application in gluten-free products—A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 56, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, H.F.; Mourad, L.; Khatib, N.; Assi, R.; Akil, S.; Khatib, S.E.; Hteit, R. Perceptions towards gluten free products among consumers: A narrative review. Appl. Food Res. 2024, 4, 100441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Capriles, V.D.; Valéria de Aguiar, E.; Garcia dos Santos, F.; Marión Fernandez, E.A.; Guedes de Melo, B.; Tagliapietra, B.L.; Scarton, M.; Pedrosa Silva Clerici, M.T.; Conti, A.C. Current status and future prospects of sensory and consumer research approaches to gluten-free bakery and pasta products. Food Res. Int. 2023, 173, 113389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Research Nester. Gluten-Free Food Market Overview. 2024. Available online: https://www.researchnester.com/kr/reports/gluten-free-food-market/5362 (accessed on 12 December 2024).
- Sedej, I.; Sakač, M.; Mandić, A.; Mišan, A.; Pestorić, M.; Šimurina, O.; Čanadanović-Brunet, J. Quality assessment of gluten-free crackers based on buckwheat flour. LWT–Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 694–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dapčević Hadnađev, T.R.; Torbica, A.M.; Hadnađev, M.S. Influence of buckwheat flour and carboxymethyl cellulose on rheological behaviour and baking performance of gluten-free cookie dough. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013, 6, 1770–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sakač, M.; Pestorić, M.; Mišan, A.; Nedeljković, N.; Jambrec, D.; Jovanoc, P.; Banjac, V.; Torbica, A.; Hadnađev, M.; Mandić, A. Antioxidant Capacity, Mineral Content and Sensory Properties of Gluten-Free Rice and Buckwheat Cookies. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2015, 53, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duta, D.E.; Culetu, A. Evaluation of rheological, physicochemical, thermal, mechanical and sensory properties of oat-based gluten free cookies. J. Food Eng. 2015, 162, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, O.J.; Jung, H.N. Effects of fats and oils on the quality characteristics of rice scone. Korean J. Food Preserv. 2019, 26, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, M.; Sandhu, K.S.; Arora, A.P.; Sharma, A. Gluten free biscuits prepared from buckwheat flour by incorporation of various gums: Physicochemical and sensory properties. LWT–Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 62, 628–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burešová, I.; Tokár, M.; Mareček, J.; Hřivna, L.; Faměra, O.; Šottníková, V. The comparison of the effect of added amaranth, buckwheat, chickpea, maize, millet and quinoa flour on rice dough rheological characteristics, textural and sensory quality of bread. J. Cereal Sci. 2017, 75, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joung, K.Y.; Song, K.Y.; O, H.; Zhang, Y.; Shin, S.Y.; Kim, Y.S. Effect of Various Gluten-free Flours on Quality Characteristics and Antioxidant Activities of Cookies. Korean J. Food Cook. Sci. 2017, 33, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vega, D.M.; Florencia Versino, F.; Dini, C.; Sonia Zulma Vina, S.Z.; García, M.A. Gluten-free baked products formulated with Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) flour. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2024, 36, 100946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.L.; Joo, S.Y. Effects of premature mandarin powder on the quality characteristics and antioxidant activities of scone. Korean J. Food Preserv. 2021, 28, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, H.K.; Lee, H.J.; Ryu, S.I.; Paik, J.K. Quality Characteristics of Rice Scones Added with Spinach Powder as a Meal Substitute for Rice Utilization. Culin. Sci. Hosp. Res. 2023, 29, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.J.; Ryu, S.I.; Paik, J.K. Quality and Characteristics of Scone Added with Pinus koraiensis Leaf Powder. Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2023, 28, 353–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, H.W.; Kim, S.Y.; Kim, E.J.; Choi, S.H.; Joo, S.Y. Physicochemical properties of scones added with Litsea japonica fruit powder. Korean J. Food Preserv. 2022, 29, 1128–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Kim, J.S. Optimization of Scone Added with Extracted Peach Liquied. Culin. Sci. Hosp. Res. 2019, 25, 145–151. [Google Scholar]
- Di Cairano, M.; Condelli, N.; Galgano, F.; Caruso, M.C. Experimental gluten-free biscuits with underexploited flours versus commercial products: Preference pattern and sensory characterisation by Check All That Apply Questionnaire. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 57, 1936–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bi, J.; Kuesten, C. Product effect size estimation and performance accuracy (validity and reliability) assessment for CATA and TCATA data. Food Qual. Prefer. 2025, 127, 105441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javier-Pisco, P.; Escriche, I.; Igual, M.; García-Segovia, P.; Pagan, M.J. Evaluation of consumer perception of new aquaculture products through applying focus group and check-all-that-apply methodologies. Foods 2024, 13, 2480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Llobell, F.; Bonnet, L.; Giacalone, D. Assessment of panel performance in CATA and RATA experiment. J. Sens. Stud. 2024, 39, e12941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Llobell, F.; Cariou, V.; Vigneau, E.; Labenne, A.; Qannari, E.M. A new approach for the analysis of data and the clustering of subjects in a CATA experiment. Food Qual. Prefer. 2019, 72, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.; Heo, J.; Kwak, H.S. Comparison of sensory profiles by two different check-all-that-apply (CATA) terms developed from trained panelists and naïve consumers. Food Qual. Prefer. 2023, 109, 104902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Ng, K.H.; Yee, K.H.; Tang, Y.; Meng, R.; He, W. Comparison of pivot profile, CATA, and pivot-CATA for the sensory profiling of instant black coffee. Food Qual. Prefer. 2023, 108, 104858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pramudya, R.C.; Seo, H. Using Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) method for determining product temperature-dependent sensory-attribute variations: A case study of cooked rice. Food Res. Int. 2018, 105, 724–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fernandes Almeida, R.; Aguiar Borges, L.; Anacleto, D.; Nunes de Souza, M.S.; Magalhães da Silva, L.B.; Monroy, Y.M.; Augusto Caldas Batista, E.; Paula Oliveira Machado, A. Gluten-free cookies: A comprehensive review of substitutes for wheat flour. Food Humanit. 2025, 4, 100549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zerbini, C.; De Canio, F.; Martinelli, E.; Luceri, B. Are gluten-free products healthy for non-celiac consumers? How the perception of well-being moderates gluten-free addiction. Food Qual. Prefer. 2024, 118, 105183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, W.; Li, Y. Advanced properties of gluten-free cookies, cakes, and crackers: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 103, 200–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cayres, C.A.; Ascheri, J.L.R.; Peixoto Gimenes Couto, M.A.; Almeida, E.L.; Melo, L. Consumers’ acceptance of optimized gluten-free sorghum-based cakes and their drivers of liking and disliking. J. Cereal Sci. 2020, 93, 102938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dogruer, I.; Baser, F.; Gulec, S.; Tokatli, F.; Ozen, B. Formulation of gluten free cookies utilizing chickpea, carob, and hazelnut flours through mixture design. Foods 2023, 12, 3689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, M.J.; Kim, S.B.; Choi, A.J.; Lee, Y.Y.; Choe, J.S. Antioxidant Activity and Functional Components of Germinated Oats according to the Sprout Length. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 8, 1337–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gwak, M.J.; Chung, S.J.; Kim, Y. Sensory drivers of liking for Adlay (Coix lacryma-jobi) tea. Korean J. Food Cult. 2012, 27, 512–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, S.H.; Hong, J.H. Determining the most influential sensory attributes of nuttiness in soymilk: A trial with Korean consumers using model soymilk. J. Sens. Stud. 2015, 30, 425–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, Y.; Ryu, J.; Ju, S. Sensory Attributes of Buckwheat Jelly (Memilmuk) with Mung Bean Starch Added to Improve Texture and Taste. Foods 2021, 10, 2860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ingredient (Ratio) | Composition (g) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wheat | Rice | Buckwheat | Black Rice | Brown Rice | Oat | |
Flour (47%) | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 |
Sugar (9.5%) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
Salt (0.3%) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Baking powder (1.6%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Butter (16%) | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Whole egg (9.5%) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
Milk (16%) | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Wheat (n = 100) | Rice (n = 100) | Buckwheat (n = 100) | Black Rice (n = 100) | Brown Rice (n = 100) | Oat (n = 100) | p-Value (2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | n | n | n | n | n | ||
Appearance | 55 | 56 | 35 | 11 | 24 | 28 | <0.001 |
Color | 61 | 61 | 40 | 15 | 33 | 28 | <0.001 |
Size | 43 | 43 | 27 | 24 | 27 | 26 | 0.003 |
Texture | 48 | 25 | 22 | 14 | 19 | 10 | <0.001 |
Harmonious pairing with jam | 41 | 41 | 18 | 25 | 31 | 26 | 0.001 |
Savory flavor | 44 | 30 | 21 | 19 | 37 | 33 | 0.001 |
Grainy flavor | 6 | 11 | 15 | 16 | 30 | 26 | <0.001 |
Unique flavor | 7 | 5 | 5 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0.477 |
Oily | 4 | 2 | - | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0.304 |
Sweet | 18 | 20 | 4 | 9 | 7 | 7 | <0.001 |
Salty | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0.927 |
Familiar flavor | 27 | 25 | 6 | 4 | 13 | 13 | <0.001 |
Harmony of ingredients | 15 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 0.019 |
Convenient to eat | 24 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 6 | 0.001 |
Newness | 2 | 4 | 3 | 22 | 6 | 6 | <0.001 |
Traditional | 4 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 0.670 |
Unique texture | 3 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 0.777 |
Familiar | 33 | 29 | 11 | 8 | 14 | 13 | <0.001 |
Cohesiveness | 4 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 0.317 |
Outer crispy | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 0.182 |
Inner color | 9 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.005 |
Nutty flavor | 5 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 15 | 11 | 0.030 |
Stuffy | 3 | 2 | - | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0.017 |
Moist | 32 | 20 | 9 | 5 | 7 | 6 | <0.001 |
Crumbly | 2 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0.729 |
Healthy | 18 | 17 | 25 | 33 | 26 | 28 | 0.074 |
Thick throat feeling | 4 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 0.744 |
Residual sensation in the mouth | 1 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 0.231 |
Others | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | 2 | 0.771 |
Wheat (n = 100) | Rice (n = 100) | Buckwheat (n = 100) | Black Rice (n = 100) | Brown Rice (n = 100) | Oat (n = 100) | p-Value (1) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
Overall liking | 6.56 (2)a | 1.31 | 4.92 bc | 0.98 | 6.72 a | 1.68 | 5.16 bc | 1.03 | 5.17 b | 1.03 | 4.42 c | 0.74 | <0.001 |
Appearance | 7.77 a | 1.55 | 6.08 bc | 1.22 | 6.95 ab | 1.74 | 5.39 c | 1.08 | 5.80 bc | 1.16 | 4.09 d | 0.68 | <0.001 |
Inner color | 7.00 a | 1.40 | 5.83 b | 1.17 | 7.01 a | 1.75 | 5.54 b | 1.11 | 5.84 b | 1.17 | 4.14 c | 0.69 | <0.001 |
Color | 7.11 a | 1.42 | 5.89 b | 1.18 | 7.06 a | 1.41 | 5.67 b | 1.13 | 5.97 b | 1.19 | 3.98 c | 0.66 | <0.001 |
Overall taste | 6.40 a | 1.28 | 4.81 b | 0.96 | 6.78 a | 1.36 | 5.20 b | 1.04 | 4.90 b | 0.98 | 4.50 b | 0.75 | <0.001 |
Texture | 6.12 a | 1.22 | 4.98 b | 1.00 | 6.51 a | 1.30 | 5.08 b | 1.02 | 4.62 b | 0.92 | 4.59 b | 0.76 | <0.001 |
Savory flavor | 6.12 ab | 1.22 | 4.94 c | 0.99 | 6.47 a | 1.08 | 5.95 ab | 1.19 | 5.49 bc | 1.10 | 4.88 c | 0.81 | <0.001 |
Sweet taste | 6.07 a | 1.21 | 4.72 bc | 0.94 | 6.20 a | 1.03 | 5.39 b | 1.08 | 4.94 bc | 0.99 | 4.34 c | 0.72 | <0.001 |
Aftertaste | 6.16 a | 1.23 | 4.45 c | 0.89 | 6.10 a | 1.02 | 5.27 b | 1.05 | 4.69 bc | 0.94 | 4.15 c | 0.69 | <0.001 |
Flavor | 6.08 a | 1.22 | 4.55 bc | 0.91 | 6.36 a | 1.06 | 5.27 b | 1.05 | 4.89 bc | 0.98 | 4.46 c | 0.74 | <0.001 |
Aroma/smell | 6.21 a | 1.24 | 5.00 b | 1.00 | 6.49 a | 1.08 | 5.52 b | 1.10 | 4.82 b | 0.96 | 4.95 b | 0.82 | <0.001 |
Softness | 5.98 b | 1.20 | 4.57 c | 0.91 | 6.63 a | 1.11 | 4.77 c | 0.95 | 4.73 c | 0.95 | 4.51 c | 0.75 | <0.001 |
Moist | 5.82 b | 1.94 | 4.78 c | 0.96 | 6.53 a | 1.09 | 4.68 c | 0.94 | 4.55 c | 0.91 | 4.35 c | 0.73 | <0.001 |
Cohesiveness | 5.65 ab | 1.88 | 5.09 bc | 1.02 | 5.92 a | 0.99 | 4.88 c | 0.98 | 4.61 c | 0.92 | 4.75 c | 0.79 | <0.001 |
Outer crispy | 5.13 ab | 1.71 | 4.76 bc | 0.95 | 5.73 a | 0.96 | 4.56 bc | 0.91 | 4.24 c | 0.85 | 4.21 c | 0.70 | <0.001 |
Purchase intention | 6.04 (3)a | 2.01 | 4.32 bc | 0.86 | 6.58 a | 1.10 | 4.79 b | 0.96 | 4.42 bc | 0.88 | 3.66 c | 0.61 | <0.001 |
Recommendation | 5.93 (3)a | 1.98 | 4.08 bc | 0.82 | 6.34 a | 1.06 | 4.60 b | 0.92 | 4.21 bc | 0.84 | 3.46 c | 0.58 | <0.001 |
Familiarity | 5.90 (3)a | 1.97 | 4.24 b | 0.85 | 6.50 a | 1.08 | 4.67 b | 0.93 | 4.47 b | 0.89 | 3.33 c | 0.56 | <0.001 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chae, J.; Kim, S.; Yeon, J.; Shin, S.; Ju, S. Consumer Acceptability of Various Gluten-Free Scones with Rice, Buckwheat, Black Rice, Brown Rice, and Oat Flours. Foods 2025, 14, 2464. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14142464
Chae J, Kim S, Yeon J, Shin S, Ju S. Consumer Acceptability of Various Gluten-Free Scones with Rice, Buckwheat, Black Rice, Brown Rice, and Oat Flours. Foods. 2025; 14(14):2464. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14142464
Chicago/Turabian StyleChae, Jihyuk, Sukyung Kim, Jeok Yeon, Sohui Shin, and Seyoung Ju. 2025. "Consumer Acceptability of Various Gluten-Free Scones with Rice, Buckwheat, Black Rice, Brown Rice, and Oat Flours" Foods 14, no. 14: 2464. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14142464
APA StyleChae, J., Kim, S., Yeon, J., Shin, S., & Ju, S. (2025). Consumer Acceptability of Various Gluten-Free Scones with Rice, Buckwheat, Black Rice, Brown Rice, and Oat Flours. Foods, 14(14), 2464. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14142464