Next Article in Journal
Research Progress on Non-Destructive Testing Technology and Equipment for Poultry Eggshell Quality
Previous Article in Journal
Long Shelf-Life Ready-to-Eat Plant-Based Whole Hard-Boiled Eggs: Low Allergenic and Regular Formulas
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 14
Issue 13
10.3390/foods14132221
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prevalence and Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Guangxi Dairy Farms

by
Kai Ma
1,
Jia Guo
1,
Jie Hu
1,
Qiuyuan Liu
2,
Hui Wang
1,* and
Ting Xue
1,3,*
1
School of Life Sciences, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
2
College of Veterinary Medicine, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
3
Joint Research Center for Food Nutrition and Health of IHM, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2025, 14(13), 2221; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14132221
Submission received: 31 May 2025 / Revised: 21 June 2025 / Accepted: 23 June 2025 / Published: 24 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Food Microbiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a major pathogen responsible for mastitis in dairy cows and can contaminate raw milk, thereby posing significant health risks to consumers. The emergence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) has further heightened public health concerns due to its antibiotic resistance and infectious potential. In this study, we examined the prevalence, virulence genes, antimicrobial resistance, spa types, and biofilm formation of S. aureus isolates from dairy farms in Guangxi Province, China. Among 242 randomly selected samples, 37 S. aureus strains were identified (15.3% infection rate), including 67.5% MRSA. Antibiotic resistance was observed in 78.4% of isolates, with 35.1% exhibiting multidrug resistance (MDR). Enterotoxin gene analysis showed sea as the most common (67.6%), followed by ser (54.1%) and seh (51.4%), whereas seb and selj were absent. All isolates formed biofilms in vitro, with 64.8% showing strong biofilm-forming ability. Staphylococcal protein A (spa) typing classified the 37 S. aureus strains into 11 spa types, with t030 being the most prevalent (43.2%). These findings indicate that S. aureus is moderately prevalent in raw milk, often carrying multiple virulence genes, forming robust biofilms, and showing antimicrobial resistance. The MRSA that is “latent” in raw milk reminds us of the need for monitoring at the farm level.

1. Introduction

As an opportunistic pathogen with zoonotic potential, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is capable of inducing a diverse range of infections, including superficial skin disorders and serious conditions, like osteomyelitis, endocarditis, and bloodstream infections [1,2]. It is a common cause of mastitis in dairy cows, which can transmit the pathogen to milk [3]. As dairy consumption rises, S. aureus contamination in milk poses significant risks to consumer health and public safety [4,5].
Antibiotics remain the main strategy for bacterial infection control. However, misuse of antimicrobial agents has led to multidrug-resistant S. aureus, which makes the treatment of S. aureus infection more challenging [6]. MRSA is one of the predominant prevalent antibiotic-resistant strains, which is resistant to methicillin and other β-lactam antibiotics [7]. In addition, the formation of biofilm is an important virulence factor in the pathogenic process of S. aureus and an important pathway for resisting external environmental stress [8]. S. aureus encodes various virulence genes, including toxic shock syndrome (TSS), hemolysin, and enterotoxins, etc. [9], among which enterotoxin is a common cause of staphylococcal food poisoning (SFP) [10]. Over 23 enterotoxins are known, categorized into SEs and Staphylococcal Enterotoxin-like (SEl), based on their ability to induce emesis. Classic SEs include sea, seb, and see genes, while SEl proteins are encoded by selj and selp [11,12].
Staphylococcal protein A (spa) contains a polymorphic X region with variable 24-bp repeats and the diversity of spa typing is caused by deletion of repeat units, repeats, and point mutations [13]. The spa typing of repeating sequences has higher discrimination than dose multilocus sequence typing. The spa typing method is a DNA sequence-based genotyping method that is relatively simple to implement [14]. Conserved regions flanking the X-region enable direct PCR amplification and sequencing. This approach provides reproducible, clear, and interpretable results for S. aureus typing [15]. It can provide an appropriate reference for epidemiological investigation or strain distribution in a region.
In this study, we investigated S. aureus in dairy farms in Guangxi Province, China, and aimed to understand more about the epidemiological characteristics of S. aureus and MRSA in dairy farms in Guangxi Province, China, through strain isolation, spa typing, antimicrobial susceptibility analysis, enterotoxin genes detection, and biofilm formation analysis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Milk Samples

Between May 2024 and January 2025, 242 milk samples were collected from different dairy farms in Nanning, Laibin, Liuzhou, Guigang, and Chongzuo, Guangxi Province, China (Figure 1). Milk samples were collected from dairy farms using a random method. Sampling was carried out after the sampler had disinfected his/her hands with 75% alcohol. The samples were placed in sterile 50 mL centrifuge tubes and transported to the laboratory under low-temperature conditions for further analysis.

2.2. Identification and Isolation of S. aureus

The isolation and identification of S. aureus were conducted using a modified protocol from a previous study [16]. In short, milk samples were first enriched in tryptic soy broth (TSB; Difco) for 8 h, followed by transfer to TSB with 7.5% NaCl and incubated at 37 °C for 16 h with shaking. Then, the cultures were serially diluted, spread onto TSB agar plates, and incubated inverted at 37 °C for 16 h, and single colonies were selected and incubated overnight. The genomes of the suspected strains were extracted separately using a TIANamp Bacteria DNA Kit (TianGen Biotech, Beijing, China). The putative S. aureus isolate was identified by sequencing with the previously described 16S rDNA primers (Table 1). Verified S. aureus isolates were preserved at −80 °C in 30% glycerol for further analysis.

2.3. Identification of mecA and Enterotoxin Genes

All isolates were analyzed for the presence of the mecA gene and various staphylococcal enterotoxin (SE) genes using PCR, with primer sequences listed in Table 1. The PCR product was detected in a 1% agarose gel containing a nucleic acid dye and subsequently observed under UV illumination. The MRSA strain was identified by the detection of the mecA gene, while a panel of SE-associated genes—sea, seb, see, seg, sec, sed, seh, sei, ser, selj, and selp—were simultaneously screened to assess potential virulence [16].

2.4. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed using the disk diffusion method according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [17]. Sensitivity to vancomycin and oxacillin was determined by broth microdilution following CLSI guidelines. Briefly, the strain to be tested was shaken and cultivated overnight; then, the bacterial solution was diluted to OD600 = 0.5, and 100 μL liquid was used to coat the plate. The drug-sensitive paper sheet was pasted onto the plate and placed in a 37 °C incubator for 18 h. Then, the circle of inhibition was measured. Strain resistance was evaluated according to the size of the ring of inhibition. The antimicrobial agents tested included oxacillin (OXA), erythromycin (ERM), ofloxacin (OFX), vancomycin (VAN), gentamicin (CN), kanamycin (KAN), tetracycline (TE), chloramphenicol (CM), ciprofloxacin (CIP), linezolid (LEZ), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SXT), and nitrofurantoin (NIT). S. aureus was resistant to three or more antibiotics, which was defined as a multidrug-resistant strain, and the quality control strains were S. aureus ATCC25923 and ATCC29213.

2.5. Biofilm Formation Assay

According to a previous description, the 96-well microtiter plate method was used for biofilm formation analysis [18]. Briefly, strains cultured overnight were diluted to OD600 = 0.03, transferred to 96-well microtiter plates, and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. After incubation, the supernatant was discarded, and each well was gently rinsed three times with PBS and left to air dry. The adherent biofilms were stained using 0.2% crystal violet (CV) for 30 min, rinsed twice with PBS to remove excess CV, and then solubilized using 33% acetic acid. The optical density (OD) was determined at 492 nm using a microplate reader. The negative control (ODc): TSB OD and biofilm formation capacity were analyzed based on the OD492 absorbance value [17]: (i) no biofilm producer: OD ≤ ODc; (ii) weak: ODc < OD ≤ (2 × ODc); (iii) moderate: (2 × ODc) < OD ≤ (4 × ODc); and (iv) strong: (4 × ODc) < OD.

2.6. spa Typing

Referring to the reported literature, spa typing was performed on all isolated strains [19]. The isolated S. aureus spa gene polymorphic X region was amplified using primers spa-1113F and spa-1514R obtained from the Ridom Spa Server http://www.spaserver.ridom.de/ (accessed on 6 November 2024). The amplification products were purified, recovered, and sequenced, and the spa type was analyzed in this database.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Each experiment was performed in triplicate. The results are expressed as the mean value accompanied by the standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software (version 18.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and differences were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Isolation and Identification of S. aureus

A total of 37 S. aureus strains were isolated by16S rDNA gene sequencing from 242 samples collected from dairy farms in Guangxi Province, China, and including 9 strains from Liuzhou (9/70, 12.9%), 5 strains from Laibin (5/38, 13.2%), 14 strains from Guigang (14/66, 21.2%), 6 strains from Nanning (6/38, 15.8%), and 3 strains from Chongzuo (3/30, 10%). The overall detection rate of S. aureus was 15.3%, with 25 strains identified as methicillin-resistant strains and 17 strains harboring the mecA gene (Table 2, Figure 2).

3.2. Analysis and Identification of spa Typing of Isolates

spa typing analysis of 37 S. aureus isolates identified 11 distinct spa types (Table 3). The most prevalent type was t030 (43.2%, 16/37), followed by t521, t084, and t189 (10.8%, 4/37 each), t529 and t012 (5.4%, 2/37 each), and t211, t289, t1381, t9303, and t9121 (1 strain each). The spa types of MRSA isolates were t030 and t9121. The 37 S. aureus isolates, representing 11 spa types, were clustered using MEGA 7.0 (Figure 3).

3.3. Enterotoxin Gene Frequencies in Isolates

Enterotoxins contribute to SPF; thus, we analyzed the toxin gene profiles of all S. aureus isolates. A total of 9 enterotoxin genes were detected in 37 strains of S. aureus. The SEs with the highest frequency were sea (67.6%, 25/37), followed by ser (54.1%, 20/37), seh (51.4%, 19/37), selp (48.7%, 18/37), see (40.5%, 15/37), sei (37.8%, 14/37), sec (24.3%, 9/37), sed (21.6%, 8/37), and seg (18.9%, 7/37), and the enterotoxin genes seb and selj were not detected (Table 4).

3.4. Antimicrobial Resistance Analysis of Isolates

The antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of 37 S. aureus isolates are shown in Table 5 and Figure 4. Of the S. aureus isolates, 8 strains (21.6%) were susceptible to all antibiotics, 14 strains (37.8%) were resistant to one antibiotic, 2 strains (5.4%) were resistant to both antibiotics, and 13 strains (35.1%) showed a multidrug-resistant phenotype (resistance to at least three antimicrobials). These isolates showed resistance to oxacillin (67.6%, 25/37), gentamicin (27%, 10/37), kanamycin (29.7%, 11/37), tetracycline (29.7%, 11/37), ofloxacin (18.9%, 7/37), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (21.6%, 8/37), erythromycin (21.6%, 8/37), ciprofloxacin (18.9%, 7/37), and nitrofurantoin (2.7%, 1/37). All S. aureus isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, chloramphenicol, and linezolid.

3.5. Biofilm Formation Ability

The biofilm-forming capacity of S. aureus is essential for stress resistance and virulence. This ability was evaluated using the crystal violet staining method. As shown in Figure 5a,b, all strains were able to form biofilms, of which 1 (2.7%, 1/37) strain showed weak biofilm formation ability, 12 (32.4%, 12/37) strains showed moderate biofilm formation ability, and 24 (64.8%, 24/37) strains showed strong biofilm formation ability. Among them, 11 strains of t030, 3 strains of t521, 4 strains of t084, 2 strains of t189, 2 strains of t012, 1 strain of t211, and 1 strain of t9121 had a strong biofilm-forming ability (Figure 5c). These results show that different S aureus isolated from dairy farms generally have the biofilm formation ability in vitro, which seriously endangers public health.

4. Discussion

S. aureus is a common foodborne pathogen. Previous studies have confirmed that S. aureus has been detected in raw milk, handmade yogurt, and other processed dairy products, posing public health risks [16,20,21]. Foodborne outbreaks caused by contaminated dairy products are the most obvious threat to public health posed by S. aureus, particularly those caused by strains with biofilm formation, enterotoxin production, and multidrug resistance [10]. For instance, one of the largest food poisoning outbreaks due to dairy Staphylococcal contamination occurred in Japan [22]. However, epidemiological data on S. aureus in dairy farms remain limited.
Here, we tested the contamination rate of raw milk from dairy farms in Guangxi Province, China, to assess the drug resistance, virulence, and biofilm-forming capacity of S. aureus isolates. In our research, conducted in raw milk from Guangxi, we found that 15.3% (37/242) of raw milk samples were positive for S. aureus. Our monitoring in Guangxi Province, China, dairy farms was comparable to the previously reported detection rate of S. aureus in raw milk in Iran (12.5%) [23], but lower than that reported in Malaysia (66.7%) [24] and Italy (41.0%) [25]. In contrast, our results showed a lower detection rate, indicating that the contamination of S. aureus was effectively controlled. These differences may be attributed to regional prevalence, variations in isolation test sensitivity, and hygiene conditions during milk production, transportation, and storage. However, it is important to note that our samples were primarily obtained from five regions in Guangxi, which may limit the representativeness of the findings. Additionally, the relatively small sample size may influence the accuracy of regional prevalence estimates. Therefore, expanding both the geographic scope and sample size in future studies will be essential for a more comprehensive assessment of the molecular epidemiology of S. aureus in the region. Furthermore, mastitis is a common disease in dairy cows that can lead to decreased milk yield and quality, higher culling rates, and substantial economic losses [26]. Infected cows are a major source of S. aureus contamination in milk, posing a threat to public health [27]. Hence, maintaining good hygiene practices and implementing strict preventative measures on dairy farms are crucial for reducing S. aureus contamination in both the environment and raw milk.
At present, the prevention and treatment of mastitis in dairy cows is mainly the use of antibiotics, driving the evolution of S. aureus resistance in animal populations. Therefore, antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates is necessary. Here, we found that 78.4% of the S. aureus isolates were resistant to at least one antibiotic, similar to previous studies where more than 90% of Chinese dairy cow isolates were resistant [28]. Most isolates are susceptible to nitrofurantoin, probably because this antibiotic is used less frequently, and our data show lower erythromycin resistance compared to other parts of China [17]. Similar to previous studies, 29.7% of S. aureus was resistant to kanamycin and tetracycline [29]. In recent years, MRSA has gained increasing awareness on farms and is easily transmitted to milk and humans who come into contact with it [30]. Ongoing monitoring of raw milk may help to prevent or mitigate the spread of MRSA strains through the dairy food chain, thereby reducing or avoiding the incidence of food poisoning caused by S. aureus. According to the article, all oxacillin MICs ≥ 2 mg/L were identified as MRSA [31]. Our results revealed that 35.1% of isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotics, and 67.6% (25/37) were identified as methicillin resistant. Resistance genes are the main cause of bacterial drug resistance. The mecA gene is the most common resistance gene in MRSA; thus, we tested the isolates for the mecA gene. However, only 45.9% (17/37) carried the mecA gene, differing from previous studies in which all methicillin-resistant strains harbored mecA [32]. The emergence of this phenomenon suggests that there may be new drug resistance genes. For example, Becker et al. found a plasmid carrying the mecB gene in 2018 during MRSA testing of isolates of S. aureus, leading to the emergence of methicillin resistance in the strain [33]. Meanwhile, the continuous identification of mecA homologs and intra- and interspecies genetic recombination of mecA and mecC promote the development of drug resistance in S. aureus [34]. Therefore, it is important to standardize the use of drugs to reduce the evolution of strains and to allow the development of targeted drugs against resistance genes. In this study, the increased prevalence of MRSA may be attributed to antibiotic overuse and inadequate environmental disinfection. Therefore, continuous monitoring is essential for controlling MRSA transmission in dairy products, preventing future contamination outbreaks, and mitigating risks to consumers.
S. aureus produces enterotoxins, which can cause food poisoning and damage the human body if contaminated milk is ingested. SFP is a common bacterial illness, and its occurrence has been linked to the expression of SE genes [35]. Twenty-two different enterotoxin genes have been reported since the first discovery of sea and seb from 1959 to 1960 [10], and although raw milk is sterilized, there may still be S. aureus that can survive the intervention [36]. Outbreaks caused by S. aureus enterotoxins have occurred during this period, posing a threat to the health of consumers. For example, there has been an outbreak of staphylococcal food poisoning in Japan, which is mainly caused by the clonal complex 81 (CC81) lineage and tested positive for sea, seb, and seh [37]. Therefore, we used PCR technology to detect the enterotoxin genes of 37 S. aureus strains. Studies have shown that the sea gene has the highest detection rate, consistent with previous findings indicating that sea is the predominant enterotoxin gene in clinical food poisoning cases in China and in isolates from raw milk [16,38]. In contrast, other studies have reported sec or sed as the most commonly detected enterotoxin genes in S. aureus isolates from raw milk [19,39]. The prevalence of these SEs in S. aureus may be influenced by regional variation and differences in sample sources. However, genes encoding novel SEs are widely present in S. aureus, and their role in pathogenesis may be underestimated.
spa typing is a commonly used method for S. aureus typing, and the common spa type in this study was t030, which is different from the results of other researchers, such as type t127 in S. aureus in Greece, and type t011 is the most common type in MRSA isolates of bovine origin [40,41], which may be due to the limited data on spa type distribution available for isolates. A previous study attempted to establish a relationship between spa type and biofilm formation capacity [42]. Biofilm formation is a key bacterial strategy for stress resistance and is considered a major virulence factor. Therefore, all S. aureus isolates were assessed for their biofilm formation capacity. The results indicate that while all isolates formed biofilms in vitro, no clear association with spa type was observed. spa typing is considered an effective genotyping tool for both national and international epidemiological surveillance due to its simplicity, reproducibility, and ease of result comparison [43]. However, the association between spa evolutionary lineages and phenotypic traits, such as antimicrobial resistance and virulence, remains poorly understood. In our study, all t030-type strains exhibited methicillin resistance, suggesting a possible association between the spa type and antibiotic resistance. Conversely, no clear link was observed between the spa type and the presence of enterotoxin genes. Among t030 strains, the number of enterotoxin genes detected ranged from 2 to 8. Although the limited sample size may constrain the generalizability of our findings, the potential relationship between spa genotypes and virulence characteristics provides valuable insight for the prevention and control of S. aureus contamination.

5. Conclusions

Our findings reveal that S. aureus isolates from raw milk in dairy farms in Guangxi Province, China, frequently harbor enterotoxin genes and exhibit biofilm-forming capacity, both of which are implicated in its pathogenesis. This suggests that these isolates are potentially contagious and may act as a trigger for foodborne infections. It is important to note that the high prevalence of MDR S. aureus make the treatment of S. aureus infection extremely challenging. Therefore, continuous monitoring of S. aureus resistance patterns in dairy products is crucial. At the same time, the 37 isolates were classified into 11 spa types, reflecting the genetic diversity of S. aureus in the region. Therefore, monitoring the infection status and molecular epidemiology of S. aureus in raw milk is crucial for developing effective control strategies to mitigate its transmission.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.W. and T.X.; Data curation, K.M. and J.G.; Formal analysis, K.M. and Q.L.; Funding acquisition, T.X.; Investigation, J.G., J.H. and Q.L.; Methodology, J.H.; Software, J.G.; Supervision, T.X.; Writing—original draft, K.M.; Writing—review & editing, H.W. and T.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (grant number: 32270194) and Research Funds of the Joint Research Center for Food Nutrition and Health of IHM (24242038).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
MICminimum inhibitory concentration
DNAdeoxyribonucleic acid
MRSAmethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
MDRmultidrug resistance
OXAoxacillin
ERMerythromycin
OFXofloxacin
VANvancomycin
CNgentamicin
KANkanamycin
TEtetracycline
CMchloramphenicol
CIPciprofloxacin
NITnitrofurantoin
SXTsulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim
LEZlinezolid

References

  1. Xue, T.; You, Y.B.; Hong, D.; Sun, H.P.; Sun, B.L. The KdpDE Two-Component System Couples Extracellular K Sensing and Agr Signaling to Infection Programming. Infect. Immun. 2011, 79, 2154–2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Murdoch, D.R.; Corey, G.R.; Hoen, B.; Miró, J.M.; Fowler, V.G.; Bayer, A.S.; Karchmer, A.W.; Olaison, L.; Pappas, P.A.; Moreillon, P.; et al. Clinical Presentation, Etiology, and Outcome of Infective Endocarditis in the 21st Century. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009, 169, 463–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Haran, K.P.; Godden, S.M.; Boxrud, D.; Jawahir, S.; Bender, J.B.; Sreevatsan, S. Prevalence and Characterization of, Including Methicillin-Resistant, Isolated from Bulk Tank Milk from Minnesota Dairy Farms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 688–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Scallan, E.; Hoekstra, R.M.; Angulo, F.J.; Tauxe, R.V.; Widdowson, M.A.; Roy, S.L.; Jones, J.L.; Griffin, P.M. Foodborne Illness Acquired in the United States-Major Pathogens. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011, 17, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Johler, S.; Macori, G.; Bellio, A.; Acutis, P.L.; Gallina, S.; Decastelli, L. Characterization of isolated along the raw milk cheese production process in artisan dairies in Italy. J. Dairy. Sci. 2018, 101, 2915–2920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gomes, F.; Henriques, M. Control of Bovine Mastitis: Old and Recent Therapeutic Approaches. Curr. Microbiol. 2016, 72, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hata, E.; Katsuda, K.; Kobayashi, H.; Uchida, I.; Tanaka, K.; Eguchi, M. Genetic Variation among Strains from Bovine Milk and Their Relevance to Methicillin-Resistant Isolates from Humans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 2130–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Felipe, V.; Morgante, C.A.; Somale, P.S.; Varroni, F.; Zingaretti, M.L.; Bachetti, R.A.; Correa, S.G.; Porporatto, C. Evaluation of the biofilm forming ability and its associated genes in species isolates from bovine mastitis in Argentinean dairy farms. Microb. Pathogenesis 2017, 104, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, W.; Lin, X.H.; Jiang, T.; Peng, Z.X.; Xu, J.; Yi, L.X.; Li, F.Q.; Fanning, S.; Baloch, Z. Prevalence and Characterization of Cultured From Raw Milk Taken From Dairy Cows With Mastitis in Beijing, China. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hennekinne, J.A.; De Buyser, M.L.; Dragacci, S. Staphylococcus aureus and its food poisoning toxins: Characterization and outbreak investigation. Fems Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 36, 815–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tarekgne, E.K.; Skjerdal, T.; Skeie, S.; Rudi, K.; Porcellato, D.; Félix, B.; Narvhus, J.A. Enterotoxin Gene Profile and Molecular Characterization of Isolates from Bovine Bulk Milk and Milk Products of Tigray Region, Northern Ethiopia. J. Food Protect 2016, 79, 1387–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Benkerroum, N. Staphylococcal enterotoxins and enterotoxin-like toxins with special reference to dairy products: An overview. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 2018, 58, 1943–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Uhlén, M.; Guss, B.; Nilsson, B.; Gatenbeck, S.; Philipson, L.; Lindberg, M. Complete sequence of the staphylococcal gene encoding protein A. A gene evolved through multiple duplications. J. Biol. Chem. 1984, 259, 1695–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Enright, M.C.; Day, N.P.J.; Davies, C.E.; Peacock, S.J.; Spratt, B.G. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 1008–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Oliveira, D.C.; Crisóstomo, I.; Santos-Sanches, I.; Major, P.; Alves, C.R.; Aires-de-Sousa, M.; Thege, M.K.; de Lencastre, H. Comparison of DNA sequencing of the protein A gene polymorphic region with other molecular typing techniques for typing two epidemiologically diverse collections of methicillin-resistant. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 574–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, H.; Shen, J.W.; Zhu, C.F.; Ma, K.; Fang, M.C.; Li, B.B.; Wang, W.H.; Xue, T. Antibiotics Resistance and Virulence of Isolates Isolated from Raw Milk from Handmade Dairy Retail Stores in Hefei City, China. Foods 2022, 11, 2185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ren, Q.; Liao, G.H.; Wu, Z.H.; Lv, J.F.; Chen, W. Prevalence and characterization of isolates from subclinical bovine mastitis in southern Xinjiang, China. J. Dairy. Sci. 2020, 103, 3368–3380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yu, D.; Zhao, L.P.; Xue, T.; Sun, B.L. autoinducer-2 quorum sensing decreases biofilm formation in an icaR-dependent manner. BMC Microbiol. 2012, 12, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhao, X.N.; Yuan, X.M.; Hu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Li, L.L.; Zhang, Q.; Yuan, X.X.; Wang, W.B.; Liu, Y.Q. Prevalence and characterization of and methicillin-resistant isolated from bulk tank milk in Shandong dairy farms. Food Control 2021, 125, 107836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ahmed, A.A.H.; Maharik, N.M.S.; Valero, A.; Kamal, S.M. Incidence of enterotoxigenic in milk and Egyptian artisanal dairy products. Food Control 2019, 104, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fetsch, A.; Contzen, M.; Hartelt, K.; Kleiser, A.; Maassen, S.; Rau, J.; Kraushaar, B.; Layer, F.; Strommenger, B. food-poisoning outbreak associated with the consumption of ice-cream. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 187, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Asao, T.; Kumeda, Y.; Kawai, T.; Shibata, T.; Oda, H.; Haruki, K.; Nakazawa, H.; Kozaki, S. An extensive outbreak of staphylococcal food poisoning due to low-fat milk in Japan: Estimation of enterotoxin A in the incriminated milk and powdered skim milk. Epidemiol. Infect. 2003, 130, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jamali, H.; Paydar, M.; Radmehr, B.; Ismail, S.; Dadrasnia, A. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of isolated from raw milk and dairy products. Food Control 2015, 54, 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. André, M.C.D.P.B.; Campos, M.R.H.; Borges, L.J.; Kipnis, A.; Pimenta, F.C.; Serafini, A.B. Comparison of isolates from food handlers, raw bovine milk and Minas Frescal cheese by antibiogram and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis following SmaI digestion. Food Control 2008, 19, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Traversa, A.; Gariano, G.R.; Gallina, S.; Bianchi, D.M.; Orusa, R.; Domenis, L.; Cavallerio, P.; Fossati, L.; Serra, R.; Decastelli, L. Methicillin resistance in strains isolated from food and wild animal carcasses in Italy. Food Microbiol. 2015, 52, 154–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Aghamohammadi, M.; Haine, D.; Kelton, D.F.; Barkema, H.W.; Hogeveen, H.; Keefe, G.P.; Dufour, S. Herd-Level Mastitis-Associated Costs on Canadian Dairy Farms. Front. Vet. Sci. 2018, 5, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schmidt, T.; Kock, M.M.; Ehlers, M.M. Molecular Characterization of Isolated from Bovine Mastitis and Close Human Contacts in South African Dairy Herds: Genetic Diversity and Inter-Species Host Transmission. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xing, X.N.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Q.; Wang, X.; Ge, W.P.; Wu, C.M. Prevalence and characterization of isolated from goat milk powder processing plants. Food Control 2016, 59, 644–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shi, C.P.; Yu, Z.N.; Ho, H.; Wang, J.; Wu, W.; Xing, M.R.; Wang, Y.T.; Rahman, S.M.E.; Han, R.W. Occurrence, Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns, and Genetic Characterization of Isolated from Raw Milk in the Dairy Farms over Two Seasons in China. Microb. Drug Resist. 2021, 27, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Khanna, T.; Friendship, R.; Dewey, C.; Weese, J.S. Methicillin resistant colonization in pigs and pig farmers. Vet. Microbiol. 2008, 128, 298–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Brown, D.F.J.; Edwards, D.I.; Hawkey, P.M.; Morrison, D.; Ridgway, G.L.; Towner, K.J.; Wren, M.W.D.; An, J.W.P.B.S. Guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis and susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant (MRSA). J. Antimicrob. Chemoth 2005, 56, 1000–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Li, Q.C.; Li, Y.; Tang, Y.Y.; Meng, C.; Ingmer, H.; Jiao, X.A. Prevalence and characterization of and in chicken from retail markets in China. Food Control 2019, 96, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Becker, K.; van Alen, S.; Idelevich, E.A.; Schleimer, N.; Seggewiss, J.; Mellmann, A.; Kaspar, U.; Peters, G. Plasmid-Encoded Transferable -Mediated Methicillin Resistance in. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2018, 24, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wolska-Gebarzewska, M.; Miedzobrodzki, J.; Kosecka-Strojek, M. Current types of staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCC) in clinically relevant coagulase-negative staphylococcal (CoNS) species. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2024, 50, 1020–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pinchuk, I.V.; Beswick, E.J.; Reyes, V.E. Staphylococcal Enterotoxins. Toxins 2010, 2, 2177–2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. McMillan, K.; Moore, S.C.; McAuley, C.M.; Fegan, N.; Fox, E.M. Characterization of isolates from raw milk sources in Victoria, Australia. Bmc Microbiol. 2016, 16, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sato’o, Y.; Omoe, K.; Naito, I.; Ono, H.K.; Nakane, A.; Sugai, M.; Yamagishi, N.; Hu, D.L. Molecular Epidemiology and Identification of a Clone Causing Food Poisoning Outbreaks in Japan. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 2637–2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yan, X.M.; Wang, B.; Tao, X.X.; Hu, Q.H.; Cui, Z.G.; Zhang, J.Z.; Lin, Y.M.; You, Y.H.; Shi, X.L.; Grundmann, H. Characterization of Strains Associated with Food Poisoning in Shenzhen, China. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2012, 78, 6637–6642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mehli, L.; Hoel, S.; Thomassen, G.M.B.; Jakobsen, A.N.; Karlsen, H. The prevalence, genetic diversity and antibiotic resistance of in milk, whey, and cheese from artisan farm dairies. Int. Dairy. J. 2017, 65, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Papadopoulos, P.; Angelidis, A.S.; Papadopoulos, T.; Kotzamanidis, C.; Zdragas, A.; Papa, A.; Filioussis, G.; Sergelidis, D. and methicillin-resistant (MRSA) in bulk tank milk, livestock and dairy-farm personnel in north-central and north-eastern Greece: Prevalence, characterization and genetic relatedness. Food Microbiol. 2019, 84, 103249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fessler, A.; Scott, C.; Kadlec, K.; Ehricht, R.; Monecke, S.; Schwarz, S. Characterization of methicillin-resistant ST398 from cases of bovine mastitis. J. Antimicrob. Chemoth 2010, 65, 619–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Thiran, E.; Di Ciccio, P.A.; Graber, H.U.; Zanardi, E.; Ianieri, A.; Hummerjohann, J. Biofilm formation of dairy isolates representing different genotypes. J. Dairy. Sci. 2018, 101, 1000–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Strommenger, B.; Braulke, C.; Heuck, D.; Schmidt, C.; Pasemann, B.; Nübel, U.; Witte, W. spa typing of as a frontline tool in epidemiological typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 574–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Foods 14 02221 g001
Figure 1. Map of sampling locations. The 5 regions are the main dairy-producing areas in Guangxi.
Figure 1. Map of sampling locations. The 5 regions are the main dairy-producing areas in Guangxi.
Foods 14 02221 g001
Foods 14 02221 g002
Figure 2. Enterotoxin genes, antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST), biofilm formation ability, mecA gene, and molecular characteristics of 37 S. aureus isolates from Guangxi Province. The 37 isolates were grouped into 11 spa types. Blue indicates a lack of the gene or no resistance; red indicates detection of the gene under study; yellow indicates resistance; and black, brown, and pink indicate strong biofilm formation capacity, medium biofilm formation capacity, and weak biofilm formation capacity, respectively. Oxacillin (OXA), erythromycin (ERM), ofloxacin (OFX), vancomycin (VAN), gentamicin (CN), kanamycin (KAN), tetracycline (TE), chloramphenicol (CM), ciprofloxacin (CIP), nitrofurantoin (NIT), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SXT), linezolid (LEZ).
Figure 2. Enterotoxin genes, antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST), biofilm formation ability, mecA gene, and molecular characteristics of 37 S. aureus isolates from Guangxi Province. The 37 isolates were grouped into 11 spa types. Blue indicates a lack of the gene or no resistance; red indicates detection of the gene under study; yellow indicates resistance; and black, brown, and pink indicate strong biofilm formation capacity, medium biofilm formation capacity, and weak biofilm formation capacity, respectively. Oxacillin (OXA), erythromycin (ERM), ofloxacin (OFX), vancomycin (VAN), gentamicin (CN), kanamycin (KAN), tetracycline (TE), chloramphenicol (CM), ciprofloxacin (CIP), nitrofurantoin (NIT), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SXT), linezolid (LEZ).
Foods 14 02221 g002
Foods 14 02221 g003
Figure 3. Phylogenic tree of the 37 isolates based on spa typing. The phylogenetic tree of 37 isolates was constructed by spa typing, and their genetic relationship was analyzed. The numbers in parentheses indicate the number of strains in the classification.
Figure 3. Phylogenic tree of the 37 isolates based on spa typing. The phylogenetic tree of 37 isolates was constructed by spa typing, and their genetic relationship was analyzed. The numbers in parentheses indicate the number of strains in the classification.
Foods 14 02221 g003
Foods 14 02221 g004
Figure 4. Frequency distribution of antimicrobial agent resistance patterns of S. aureus. The abscissa represents the number of antibiotics tested, and the ordinate represents the number of resistant strains. A total of 8 strains were susceptible to all antibiotics and 13 strains were resistant to three or more antibiotics.
Figure 4. Frequency distribution of antimicrobial agent resistance patterns of S. aureus. The abscissa represents the number of antibiotics tested, and the ordinate represents the number of resistant strains. A total of 8 strains were susceptible to all antibiotics and 13 strains were resistant to three or more antibiotics.
Foods 14 02221 g004
Foods 14 02221 g005
Figure 5. Biofilm formation ability of 37 S. aureus isolates. (a) A photograph of biofilm in 96-well plates after staining with crystal violet. (b) OD492 absorbance value of biofilm stained with crystal violet after dissolving in 33% glacial acetic acid. Values 0.22 and 0.44 indicate moderate biofilm-forming capacity and strong biofilm-forming capacity. (c) Different spa types and biofilm formation ability.
Figure 5. Biofilm formation ability of 37 S. aureus isolates. (a) A photograph of biofilm in 96-well plates after staining with crystal violet. (b) OD492 absorbance value of biofilm stained with crystal violet after dissolving in 33% glacial acetic acid. Values 0.22 and 0.44 indicate moderate biofilm-forming capacity and strong biofilm-forming capacity. (c) Different spa types and biofilm formation ability.
Foods 14 02221 g005
Table 1. Oligonucleotide primers used in this study.
Table 1. Oligonucleotide primers used in this study.
GenePrimerPrimer Sequence (5′-3′)Reference or Source
16S27FAGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAGThis study
1492RTACCTTGTTACGACTT
mecAmecA-FGTTGTAGTTGTCGGGTTTThis study
mecA-RCCACATTGTTTCGGTCTA
spaspa-1113FTAAAGACGATCCTTCGGTGAGCRidom
spa-1514RCAGCAGTAGTGCCGTTTGCTTRidom
seasea-FGGTTATCAATGTGCGGGTGG[16]
sea-RCGGCACTTTTTTCTCTTCGG
sebseb-FGTATGGTGGTGTAACTGAGC[16]
seb-RCCAAATAGTGACGAGTTAGG
secsec-FAGATGAAGTAGTTGATGTGTATGG[16]
sec-RCACACTTTTAGAATCAACCG
sedsed-FCCAATAATAGGAGAAAATAAAAG[16]
sed-RATTGGTATTTTTTTTCGTTC
seesee-FTGTATGTATGGAGGTGTAAC[16]
see-RGCCAAAGCTGTCTGAG
segseg-FGTTAGAGGAGGTTTTATG[16]
seg-RTTCCTTCAACAGGTGGAGA
sehseh-FCAACTGCTGATTTAGCTCAG[16]
seh-RCCCAAACATTAGCACCA
seisei-FGGCCACTTTATCAGGACA[16]
sei-RAACTTACAGGCAGTCCA
serser-FAGATGTGTTTGGAATACCCTAT[16]
ser-RCTATCAGCTGTGGAGTGCAT
seljselj-FGTTCTGGTGGTAAACCA[16]
selj-RGCGGAACAACAGTTCTGA
selpselp-FTCAAAAGACACCGCCAA[16]
selp-RATTGTCCTTGAGCACCA
Table 2. Prevalence of S. aureus in milk from Guangxi Province, China.
Table 2. Prevalence of S. aureus in milk from Guangxi Province, China.
LocationsNo. of SamplesNo. of S. aureus (%)No. of MRSA * (%)
Liuzhou709 (12.9%)9 (12.9%)
Laibin385 (13.2%)3 (7.8%)
Guigang6614 (21.2%)8 (12.1%)
Nanning386 (15.8%)3 (7.9%)
Chongzuo303 (10%)2 (6.6%)
Total24237(15.3%)25
* MRSA: methicillin-resistant S. aureus.
Table 3. spa types of the isolated S. aureus.
Table 3. spa types of the isolated S. aureus.
spa Typespa Repeat SuccessionNo. and Proportion of Isolates
t03015-12-16-02-24-2416 (43.2%)
t52107-23-12-21-17-34-34-34-34-33-344 (10.8%)
t08407-23-12-34-34-12-12-23-02-12-234 (10.8%)
t18907-23-12-21-17-344 (10.8%)
t52904-342 (5.4%)
t01215-12-16-02-16-02-25-17-24-242 (5.4%)
t21111-19-12-12-21-17-34-24-34-22-251 (2.7%)
t28926-23-21-17-34-12-23-02-12-231 (2.7%)
t138107-23-21-16-34-33-341 (2.7%)
t930304-20-24-171 (2.7%)
t9121111 (2.7%)
Table 4. Occurrence of enterotoxin genes of S. aureus.
Table 4. Occurrence of enterotoxin genes of S. aureus.
Enterotoxin GenesNo. of S. aureusDetection Rate
sea2567.6%
seb00
sec924.3%
sed821.6%
see1540.5%
seg718.9%
seh1951.4%
sei1437.8%
ser2054.1%
selj00
selp1848.7%
Table 5. Number and percentage of antimicrobial-resistant S. aureus isolates.
Table 5. Number and percentage of antimicrobial-resistant S. aureus isolates.
Antibiotic ClassAntibioticNo. of Resistant S. aureus (%)
β-LactamsOxacillin25 (67.6%)
AminoglycosidesGentamicin10 (27%)
Kanamycin11 (29.7%)
TetracyclinesTetracycline11 (29.7%)
SulfonamidesSulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim8 (21.6%)
ChloramphenicolChloramphenicol0 (0%)
MacrolidesErythromycin8 (21.6%)
QuinolonesOfloxacin7 (18.9%)
Ciprofloxacin7 (18.9%)
Oxazolidinoneslinezolid0 (0%)
NitrofuransNitrofurantoin1 (2.7%)
GlycopeptideVancomycin0 (0%)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, K.; Guo, J.; Hu, J.; Liu, Q.; Wang, H.; Xue, T. Prevalence and Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Guangxi Dairy Farms. Foods 2025, 14, 2221. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14132221

AMA Style

Ma K, Guo J, Hu J, Liu Q, Wang H, Xue T. Prevalence and Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Guangxi Dairy Farms. Foods. 2025; 14(13):2221. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14132221

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Kai, Jia Guo, Jie Hu, Qiuyuan Liu, Hui Wang, and Ting Xue. 2025. "Prevalence and Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Guangxi Dairy Farms" Foods 14, no. 13: 2221. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14132221

APA Style

Ma, K., Guo, J., Hu, J., Liu, Q., Wang, H., & Xue, T. (2025). Prevalence and Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Guangxi Dairy Farms. Foods, 14(13), 2221. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14132221

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop