Next Article in Journal
Terahertz Spectroscopic Identification of Roast Degree and Variety of Coffee Beans
Next Article in Special Issue
Encapsulation and Characterization of Proanthocyanidin Microcapsules by Sodium Alginate and Carboxymethyl Cellulose
Previous Article in Journal
The Potential of Edible Insects as a Safe, Palatable, and Sustainable Food Source in the European Union
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improvement of Temperature Distribution Uniformity of Ready-to-Eat Rice during Microwave Reheating via Optimizing Packaging Structure
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Edible Organic Acid Soaking on Color, Protein Physicochemical, and Digestion Characteristics of Ready-to-Eat Shrimp upon Processing and Sterilization

State Key Laboratory of Marine Food Processing & Safety Control, National Engineering Research Center of Seafood, Collaborative Innovation Center of Seafood Deep Processing, School of Food Science and Technology, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2024, 13(3), 388; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13030388
Submission received: 19 December 2023 / Revised: 22 January 2024 / Accepted: 22 January 2024 / Published: 24 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Techniques for the Processing and Preservation of Foods)

Abstract

:
Soft-packed ready-to-eat (RTE) shrimp has gradually become popular with consumers due to its portability and deliciousness. However, the browning caused by high-temperature sterilization is a non-negligible disadvantage affecting sensory quality. RTE shrimp is processed through “boiling + vacuum soft packing + high temperature and pressure sterilization”. Ultraviolet-visible (UV) spectroscopy with CIELAB color measurement showed that phytic acid (PA) + lactic acid (LA), PA + citric acid (CA), and PA + LA + CA soaking before cooking alleviated browning, as well as UVabsorbance and the browning index (BI). Meanwhile, UV spectroscopy and fluorescence spectroscopy showed that organic acid soaking reduced the content of carbonyl, dityrosine, disulfide bonds, surface hydrophobicity, and protein solubility, but promoted the content of free sulfhydryl and protein aggregation. However, in vitro digestion simulations showed that organic acid soaking unexpectedly inhibited the degree of hydrolysis and protein digestibility. This study provides the basis for the application of organic acids as color protectors for RTE aquatic muscle product.

1. Introduction

Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus Vannamei), belonging to Arthropoda, Crustacea, Decapoda, Penaeidae, Penaeus, is one of the three largest farmed shrimps in the world. As an aquatic muscle food, it is rich in protein, polyunsaturated fatty acids, vitamins, and minerals, and is popular with consumers [1].
At present, Pacific white shrimp is mainly sold fresh and frozen, supplemented by drying, etc. Selling the product fresh, as a traditional selling method, can fully retain the nutritional quality. However, due to the rich nutrients, high water content, and strong endogenous enzyme activity, it is prone to deterioration and blackening, making for geographical restrictions. Selling the product frozen is the most widely utilized method of sale, which can effectively prevent spoilage caused by microorganisms and enzymes. However, selling it frozen requires strict cold chain control throughout the process, which makes the cost high [2]. Dried shrimp is a form of product that has emerged in recent years due to its unique flavor, stable quality, and convenient consumption. However, due to the low moisture content, dried shrimp tastes poor [3]. Recently, soft-packed ready-to-eat (RTE) products have gradually emerged due to their ease of preparation and consumption. RTE shrimp is prepared with a “boiling + vacuum packing + thermal sterilization” process [4]. Compared to dried shrimp, RTE shrimp has a higher moisture content and good taste. The sensory properties of RTE shrimp, which include many factors such as color, flavor, and texture, are of great importance to consumers [5]. Due to the action of astaxanthin, boiled shrimp has a bright pink color. However, the Maillard reaction that occurs during thermal sterilization and storage darkens the shrimp color. Wang S. et al. [6] found that the color of roasted Pacific white prawn was deepened by thermal sterilization. Li et al. [4] found that RTE shrimp changed from orange–red to dark brown during storage.
Phytic acid (PA) is a kind of edible organic acid, which can inhibit oxidation reaction by complexing metal ions [7]. Lactic acid (LA) and citric acid (CA) are edible acidity regulators, which have the functions of maintaining food color, improving food flavor, and assisting antioxidant [8,9,10]. Our previous study found that PA combined with LA could effectively delay the color deterioration of RTE shrimp during storage [4]. However, the effect of organic acids on the color of RTE products upon high-temperature sterilization has rarely been studied.
In addition to delaying color deterioration, organic acids can also bind to protein, causing changes in protein physicochemical and digestive properties. PA is rich in phosphate ions, which can form binary complexes with amino groups of protein through electrostatic interactions at low pH and form ternary complexes with protein through cationic bridges in an environment above the isoelectric point [11]. CA contains a carboxyl group, in which the positively charged carbon can cross-link with the amino group of the protein to form an amide bond through a nucleophilic substitution reaction [12]. Kaspchak et al. [13] found that protein aggregation caused by PA binding to proteins through electrostatic interaction reduced the digestibility of bovine serum albumin in vitro. Qiu et al. [14] found that in the stomach environment (acidic pH), CA reduced digestibility by promoting the aggregation of wheat gluten protein, while in the intestinal environment (neutral pH), CA improved digestibility by significantly increasing the solubility of wheat gluten protein. However, few studies have addressed the effect of organic acids on protein physicochemical properties and the protein digestibility of RTE aquatic muscle products.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of organic acid soaking on color, protein physicochemical properties, and the in vitro digestibility of RTE shrimp upon cooking and sterilization. This work will provide a theoretical basis for the color regulation, protein physicochemical properties, and digestive characteristics of RTE aquatic muscle products.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Chemicals

Frozen Litopenaeus vannamei shrimp (about 9 g per shrimp) was purchased from a market next to Dalian Polytechnic University in Dalian, Liaoning, China. PA, CA, and a phosphorus-free water-retaining agent (all food-grade additives) were purchased from Zhejiang Yinuo Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Lanxi, China). LA was purchased from Hebei Wanbang Industrial Co., Ltd. (Xingtai, China). Other reagents in this study were purchased from Bonuo Reagent Co., Ltd. (Dalian, China).

2.2. Sample Preparation

After thawing (immersed in distilled water at about 15 °C) for 2 h, the shrimps were peeled and decapitated and then divided into 4 groups, including the control group (group 1) and three organic acid soaking groups (group 2–4). The shrimps in group 1 were soaked in distilled water (1:2, w/v) for 3 h at 4 °C and the shrimps in group 2–4 were soaked in 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA solution, 0.04% PA + 0.2% CA solution, and 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA + 0.2% CA solution (1:2, w/v) for 3 h at 4 °C, respectively. Subsequently, the RTE shrimp was processed by boiling in the corresponding soaking solution at 100 °C for 7 min, drying at 40 °C for 1 h, vacuum packing, and then sterilizing at 102.9 kPa, 115 °C for 20 min.

2.3. Sensory Evaluation and Color Analysis

The color evaluation (redness, yellowness, brightness, glossiness, and overall acceptability) of the RTE shrimp was conducted by a trained panel of 8 researchers. On a scale of 1–30 points, a sample grade was assigned, where 30 points represented strongly liking and 1 point represented strongly disliking the shrimp. The color of the RTE shrimp was determined with a HunterLab UltraScan PRO colorimeter (Hunter Associates Laboratory, Inc., Reston, VA, USA) combined with a three-point test [15].

2.4. Ultraviolet Absorbance (UV-Absorbance) and Browning Index (BI)

The UV-absorbance and BI were measured according to the method described by Ajandouz et al. [16].

2.5. Thiobarbituric Acid-Reactive Substances (TBARs)

TBARs were determined based on the method of Li et al. [17].

2.6. Protein Oxidation

2.6.1. Carbonyl

The carbonyl was determined with a protein carbonyl assay kit (No. A087, Jiancheng Technology Co., Nanjing, China) by reacting protein carbonyl with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine to form a red 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone precipitate. The results were expressed in nanomoles per milligram of protein.

2.6.2. Free Sulfhydryl

The free sulfhydryl (SH) was determined based on the reaction of DTNP with sulfhydryls [18].

2.7. Protein Cross-Linking

2.7.1. Dityrosine

Dityrosine was determined according to the method of Ma et al. [19]. The content of dityrosine in the protein solution was recorded with a hitachIF-2700 fluorescence spectrophotometer (Hitachi Co., Tokyo, Japan) (emission wavelength 420 nm, excitation wavelength 325 nm, and slit 5 nm).

2.7.2. Disulfide Bond

The disulfide bond was determined with the method of Beveridge et al. [18] based on the reaction of DTNP with sulfhydryls.

2.8. Protein Aggregation

2.8.1. Salt-Soluble Protein Aggregation

Protein aggregation was measured with the fluorescence intensity emitted by Nile red binding to protein aggregates [20]. An amount of 3 mL of the sample supernatant (the protein concentration was adjusted to 2 mg/mL) was mixed with 30 μL of Nile red (0.32 mg/1 mL of ethanol), vortexed for 1 min, and the fluorescence was measured with a hitachIF-2700 fluorescence spectrophotometer (Hitachi Co., Japan) (emission wavelength 620 nm, excitation wavelength 560 nm, and slit 10 nm). The results were expressed in arbitrary units (AU).

2.8.2. Salt-Soluble Protein Solubility

Protein solubility was measured with the method of Vossen and De Smet [21].

2.9. Surface Hydrophobicity

Protein surface hydrophobicity was measured with 8-aniline-1-naphthalene sulfonic acid (ANS) [22]. The sample protein concentration was adjusted to 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2 mg/mL. Then 40 μL of 8 mM ANS was added into the 4 mL protein solution. After mixing, the fluorescence intensity was measured with a hitachIF-2700 fluorescence spectrophotometer (Hitachi Co., Japan) (emission wavelength 470 nm, excitation wavelength 390 nm, and slit width 5 nm). Surface hydrophobicity was obtained with the slope of a plot of fluorescence intensity versus protein concentration.

2.10. In Vitro Digestion

The shrimp freeze-dried powder was simulated for digestion in vitro [23]. An amount of 0.5 g of freeze-dried shrimp powder was digested with 3 mL of simulated gastric fluid (containing 2000 U/mL pepsin, pH 3.0) at 100 rpm at 37 °C for 2 h. Then 6 mL of simulated intestinal fluid (containing 100 U/mL trypsin, pH 7.0) was added to the system to digest at 100 rpm at 37 °C for 2 h. Digestion was terminated by boiling for 10 min.

2.10.1. Degree of Hydrolysis (DH)

The DH was measured with ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA) [24]. Briefly, digested samples were centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min. Then, 200 μL of the supernatant was mixed with 1.5 mL of OPA reagent for 2 min, and the absorbance was immediately measured at 340 nm. At the same time, the standard samples (serine) and blank samples were taken for measurement. The DH was calculated with the following formula:
Seirne-NH 2 ( mmol / L ) = OD sample OD blank OD standard OD blank × 0.9516 × A × B × 0.001 ÷ m ÷ P
where OD is the absorbance value, A is the volume of the supernatant, B is the diluted multiples, m is the sample mass, and P is the protein content in the sample (percent).
h = Seirne-NH 2 β α   meqv / g   protein
where α is 1.00 and β is 0.40.
DH   ( % ) = h h t o t   ×   100
where h is the number of hydrolyzed peptide bonds and htot is the total number of peptide bonds.

2.10.2. Dry Matter Digestibility

Dry matter digestibility was measured according to the method of Fang et al. [25]. In short, the digested samples were mixed with ethanol at a ratio of 1:3 (m/v) to precipitate protein and centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the precipitate was freeze-dried. The digestibility was calculated with the following formula:
Dry   matter   digestibility   ( % ) = P 1 P 2 P 1 × 100
where P1 is the dry matter weight before digestion and P2 is the dry matter weight of the freeze-dried precipitate after digestion.

2.11. Statistical Analysis

Three parallel experiments were carried out in the above experiments. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with SPSS software (version 26.0, SPSS Inc., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to assess the differences between the means. p < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference. Origin 2018 (OriginLab, Inc., Northampton, MA, USA) software was used for data mapping.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Sensory Evaluation and Color Analysis

The raw shrimp appeared gray–blue due to astaxanthin binding to protein [26]. After cooking, the structure of the astaxanthin protein was destroyed and the red astaxanthin was released, causing the shrimp to turn pink–red (Figure 1A) [27]. Meanwhile, sensory evaluation based on redness, yellowness, brightness, gloss, and overall acceptability showed that the color of the boiled shrimp was red and bright, with a higher overall acceptability (Figure 1G). However, after high-temperature sterilization, the shrimp visually turned brown and dark (Figure 1B), with a lower overall acceptability (Figure 1G). In contrast, the shrimp soaked in organic acids had a higher overall acceptability.
The color parameters of the RTE shrimp in different groups upon thermal processing are shown in Figure 1C–F. L* is the brightness index: the larger the value, the better the sample gloss. a* and b* are the color indexes, where a* represents red (+) or green (−) and b* represents yellow (+) or blue (−). The W* value is the whiteness value, which is proportional to the whiteness of the sample [28]. Compared with the control group, the PA + LA-, PA + CA-, and PA + LA + CA-soaked groups showed higher L* and W* but lower a* and b*, indicating that organic acid soaking inhibited the color deterioration of the shrimp upon sterilization. Qi et al. [15] also found that CA (0.1–0.5% w/t) treatment can significantly improve the overall brightness of seasoned fish after 35 min of sterilization at 110 °C.

3.2. UV-Absorbance and BI

The Maillard reaction is a non-enzymatic process in which melanoidins are formed from carbonyls (reduced sugar) and amino compounds (amino acid and protein) through a series of reactions [29]. The Maillard reaction greatly contributes to the black–brown color of shrimp, and its intermediate and final products can be characterized with UV-absorbance and BI, respectively. UV-absorbance (A294 nm) is an indicator to characterize colorless intermediate products produced by the Maillard reaction [30], while the BI (A420 nm) is an indicator of melanoid formation at the end of the Maillard reaction [31].
The A294 nm and A420 nm values of RTE shrimp in the different groups upon thermal processing are shown in Figure 2A,B. Compared to the control group, the A294 nm and A420 nm values were reduced in PA + LA-, PA + CA-, and PA + LA + CA-soaked groups, suggesting that organic acid soaking had a certain inhibitory effect on the Maillard reaction. The Maillard reaction rate is affected by the pH value of the system, which is positively correlated with the pH value in the range of pH 3~9 [32]. The possible reasons are as follows: (1) at low pH, the amino group is in a protonated state (-NH3+), which is not conducive to carbonyl-amide condensation between sugar and amino acids. While at high pH, the amino group is completely deprotonated, which accelerates the carbonyl ammonia condensation [33]; (2) at a low pH, reduced sugars tend to exist in a closed loop, which shields the carbonyl group to a certain extent and is not conducive to the Maillard reaction, while a high pH value provides favorable conditions for the molecular rearrangement of sugar, which can promote the occurrence of nucleophilic addition reaction [34]. Therefore, it was speculated that the low pH environment caused by PA + LA-, PA + CA-, and PA + LA + CA-soaking was one of the reasons for inhibiting the Maillard reaction. In addition, metal ions have been shown to accelerate the Maillard reaction by catalyzing the oxidation of lipids to aldehydes (substrates of the Maillard reaction) and by accelerating the formation of Amadori compounds (the product of the Maillard reaction primary stage) [35]. In this study, compared with the control group, organic acid soaking inhibited the oxidation of lipids to aldehydes (TBARs, Figure 2C), resulting in a decrease in the substrate of the Maillard reaction. PA contains six phosphate groups, which are highly electronegative and can chelate metal ions by ionic bonding, while CA and LA contain three and two carboxyl groups, respectively, which can form coordination bonds with metal ions to form stable complexes [36,37]. Sanchis et al. [38] found that PA can inhibit the formation of advanced glycosylation end products (AGEs) in Fe3+, Lys, Arg, and ribose systems by binding to iron ions. Therefore, it is speculated that the formation of complexes between organic acids and metal ions is another reason to inhibit the Maillard reaction.

3.3. Protein Oxidation

Protein oxidation deepens the color of aquatic muscle food. In addition, protein oxidation also has an effect on protein digestibility. Protein carbonylation is a typical feature of protein oxidation. Carbonyl groups can be formed by direct oxidation of lysine, arginine, proline, and threonine residues on the protein side chain by free radicals. In addition, carbonyl groups can also be formed at the fracture site by the direct action of free radicals on peptide bonds by extracting hydrogen from carbon atoms [39]. The reduction in free sulfhydryl groups is another important feature of protein oxidation. The sulfur outer layer on the sulfhydryl group has many lone pairs of electrons, which exhibit strong nucleophilicity and are easily attacked by free radicals to generate oxidation products such as disulfide bonds [40].
The oxidation indexes of RTE shrimp from different groups upon thermal processing are shown in Figure 3A,B. Compared with those of the control group, the carbonyl contents of the PA + LA-, PA + CA-, and PA + LA + CA-soaked groups decreased, while the free sulfhydryl increased, indicating that organic acid soaking could inhibit protein oxidation. Studies have shown that thermal processing promotes the oxidation of protein in meat products, which is manifested as the increase in carbonyl groups and the decrease in free sulfhydryl groups [41]. The reasons for protein oxidation caused by thermal processing are as follows: (1) thermal processing reduces the antioxidant activity of antioxidant components (such as catalase, glutathione peroxidase, etc.) [42]; (2) thermal processing destroys the cell membrane structure, and transition metal ions such as Cu2+ and Fe2+ are released by cells, inducing free radical production [43]. Therefore, it was speculated that PA + LA, PA + CA, and PA + LA + CA soaking could interrupt or destroy the chain reaction of protein oxidation by chelating metal ions.

3.4. Protein Cross-Linking

Protein cross-linking refers to the process of forming cross-links between polypeptide chains (intramolecular or intermolecular) through covalent bonds, which affect the protein digestive properties by affecting the contact site with digestive enzymes [44]. Dityrosine and disulfide bonds are covalent bonds formed by the oxidation of tyrosine and cysteine within or between molecules, which can be used to characterize protein cross-linking [45]. Tyrosine is an amino acid that is easily attacked by free radicals. As a sensitive site in tyrosine, the phenolic hydroxyl group is attacked by free radicals to form phenoxy radicals. Phenoxy radicals are isomerized to C-centric radicals, which are structurally unstable and eventually exist as stable dimerizers (dityrosine) [46]. Fluorescence spectroscopy is the most commonly used method for detecting dityrosine. The singly ionized form of dityrosine has strong fluorescence at about 400 nm after excitation at about 315 nm, and its fluorescence intensity is proportional to the content of the dityrosine [47]. Cysteine is another amino acid that is sensitive to free radicals. The reactive sulfhydryl group on the cysteine side chain residue is easily attacked by free radicals and easily forms covalent bonds with the other half of cysteine side chain residues [48].
The dityrosine and disulfide bonds of RTE shrimp upon thermal processing are shown in Figure 4A,B. Compared with those of the control group, the dityrosine and cysteine contents of the PA + LA-, PA + CA-, and PA + LA + CA-soaked groups were significantly reduced, indicating that organic acid soaking had a certain inhibitory effect on protein covalent cross-linking. Previous studies have shown that tyrosine and cysteine are easily attacked by free radicals to form dityrosine and disulfide bonds upon thermal processing [19]. In this study, it was hypothesized that the metal ion chelation ability of organic acids would weaken the oxidation of dityrosine and cysteine, thereby inhibiting the covalent cross-linking of proteins.

3.5. Salt-Soluble Protein Aggregation and Salt-Soluble Protein Solubility

As an aquatic muscle food, shrimp protein is composed of salt-soluble protein (myofibrillar protein), water-soluble protein (sarcoplasmic protein), and muscle-matrix protein [49]. The main component of salt-soluble protein is myofibrillar protein, which is the main protein in shrimp muscle, accounting for 65% to 75% of the total protein [50]. Aggregation and solubility affect protein digestibility by affecting the physical accessibility of proteins and digestive enzymes.
The fluorescence intensity of salt-soluble protein is shown in Figure 5A. Compared with the control group, the PA + LA-, PA + CA-, and PA + LA + CA-soaked groups all showed significantly enhanced fluorescence intensity, implying that organic acid soaking promoted the aggregation of salt-soluble proteins. Studies have shown that forces that drive protein aggregation include covalent bonds caused by protein oxidation (dityrosine and disulfide bonds) [48], covalent bonds formed by proteins to other non-protein substances (amide, etc.) [51], and weak interactions (electrostatic interactions, van der Waals forces, hydrophobic interaction, etc.) [52]. The above results showed that PA + LA, PA + CA, and PA + LA + CA soaking can inhibit the formation of dityrosine and disulfide bonds (covalent bonds caused by protein oxidation) by chelating metal ions. Therefore, it is reasonable to speculate that covalent bonds formed by cross-linking protein with other non-protein substances and the weak interaction may have been responsible for the increased protein aggregation in the PA + LA-, PA + CA-, and PA + LA + CA-soaked groups. CA contains three carboxyl groups, which can form covalent bonds through amide bonds with the the free amino group of the protein by nucleophilic substitution to produce a protein–CA conjugate [53]. PA contains abundant phosphate ions, which can form binary complexes with amino groups of protein through electrostatic interaction at low pH and form ternary complexes with proteins through cationic bridges in an environment above the isoelectric point [11]. Darby et al. [54] also found that phytate–protein lysozyme binding interactions were driven by electrostatic interactions between positively charged proteins and negatively charged phytates. In addition, PA, LA, and CA, as edible organic acids, reduce the pH of the system by dissociating H+. Compared with that in the control group, the pH values in the systems of the PA + LA-, PA + CA-, and PA + LA + CA-soaked groups were closer to the isoelectric point of myofibrillar protein (the main protein in shrimp), making the protein less charged on the surface and more likely to aggregate.
Protein solubility refers to the amount of protein remaining in the supernatant after centrifugation in a specific solution [55]. The solubility of protein is inversely proportional to the degree of aggregation. The solubility of the salt-soluble protein of RTE shrimp upon thermal processing is shown in Figure 5B. Compared with the control group, the PA + LA-, PA + CA-, and PA + LA + CA-soaked groups all showed decreased solubility of salt-soluble protein. Previous studies have also shown that organic acids can reduce the solubility of protein. Kaspchak et al. [56] treated soybean, pea, and rice protein isolates with PA and found that PA reduced the solubility of the three isolates at pH 3.0. Li et al. [57] treated whey protein isolate with CA and found that CA significantly reduced the solubility of the whey protein isolate.

3.6. Surface Hydrophobicity

Surface hydrophobicity indicates the exposure of hydrophobic amino acid residues in protein molecules and is an index to characterize the change of protein structure. A common reagent is 40 ANS for detecting surface hydrophobicity, which is basically non-fluorescent in aqueous solutions and enhanced after highly specific binding to hydrophobic groups [58].
The surface hydrophobicity of RTE shrimp upon thermal processing is shown in Figure 5C. Compared with the control group, the PA + LA-, PA + CA-, and PA + LA + CA-soaked groups all significantly showed reduced surface hydrophobicity. The oxidation of protein induced by thermal processing exposed the internal hydrophobic amino acids, which led to an increase in surface hydrophobicity [59]. In this study, it was speculated that PA + LA, PA + CA, and PA + LA + CA soaking can inhibit protein oxidation with chelating metal ions, thereby reducing the surface hydrophobicity of the protein. In addition, studies have shown that protein aggregation may shield some hydrophobic amino acids, which leads to a decrease in surface hydrophobicity [57]. Our results showed that PA + LA, PA + CA, and PA + LA + CA soaking promoted protein aggregation, which was speculated to be another reason for the decrease in surface hydrophobicity.

3.7. In Vitro Digestion

The DH refers to the degree to which a protein is hydrolyzed into peptides and amino acids under the action of digestive enzymes [60]. In this study, the main substances digested in the system were proteins due to the use of pepsin and trypsin for in vitro simulated digestion. Dry matter digestibility was used to reflect the degree of protein digestion. The DH and dry matter digestibility of RTE shrimp upon thermal processing are shown in Figure 6A–D. Compared with that in the control group, organic acid soaking significantly decreased the simulated gastric and gastrointestinal DH and dry matter digestibility.
The difference in protein digestibility between the control group and PA + LA-, PA + CA-, and PA + LA + CA-soaked groups was related to the difference in protein structure. Lysine and arginine residues are the most common oxidation sites of proteins and are also the specific cleavage sites of trypsin [61]. This indicates that the degree of protein oxidation is inversely proportional to digestibility to some extent. However, in this study, through a correlation analysis (Figure 6E), it was found that the DH and digestibility of RTE shrimp were positively correlated with protein oxidation indices and negatively correlated with protein aggregation. Therefore, it was speculated that the protein aggregation induced by PA + LA, PA + CA, and PA + LA + CA soaking led to the decrease in DH and digestibility. The phosphoric acid of PA and the carboxyl group of LA and CA could react with proteins through electrostatic interactions and covalent bonds. This caused protein aggregation and blocked the protein–enzyme binding site, resulting in reduced protein digestibility. Kaspchak et al. [13] found that PA reduced the in vitro digestibility of bovine serum albumin, possibly due to protein aggregation caused by electrostatic interactions. Qiu et al. [14] explored the effect of CA on the physicochemical properties and in vitro digestibility of wheat gluten and found that in the stomach environment (acidic pH), CA decreased digestibility by promoting the aggregation of wheat gluten protein, while in the intestinal environment (neutral pH), CA increased digestibility by significantly improving the solubility of wheat gluten protein.

4. Conclusions

The browning of RTE shrimp upon sterilization could be alleviated by PA + LA, PA + CA, and PA + LA + CA soaking. Meanwhile, organic acid soaking inhibited protein oxidation and protein cross-linking by chelating metal ions, but induced protein aggregation by binding to proteins with covalent bonds and weak interactions. However, it was found that organic acid soaking had a negative effect on protein digestion in vitro, which may have been attributed to the increase in aggregation. This study provides the basis for the application of organic acids as color protectors for RTE aquatic muscle products. In the future, regulatory methods that can protect the color of RTE aquatic muscle products without affecting protein digestibility, such as adding lactic acid bacteria instead of organic acids, should be explored.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, C.G. and D.Z.; investigation and analysis, C.G., Y.F. and Z.W.; resources, D.Z.; writing and review, C.G. and D.Z.; supervision, D.L., Y.L. and D.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the “The National Natural Science Foundation of China (32102029, U1808203)”, “National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFD0901000)”, “Dalian Science and Technology Innovation Fund Project (2019J11CY005)”, “Central Funds Guiding the Local Science and Technology Development (No. 2020JH6/10500002)”, and “Marine Economic Development Project of Liaoning Province (2022-47)”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our thanks to all the participants in the present research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Cheng, X.; Li, M.; Leng, X.; Wen, H.; Wu, F.; Yu, L.; Jiang, M.; Lu, X.; Gao, W.; Zhang, W.; et al. Creatine improves the flesh quality of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) reared in freshwater. Food Chem. 2021, 354, 12949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhu, S.; Yu, J.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Q.; Cai, X.; Ding, Y.; Zhou, X.; Wang, S. Dual cryoprotective strategies for ice-binding and stabilizing of frozen seafood: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 111, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alfiya, P.; Rajesh, G.; Murali, S.; Delfiya, D.A.; Samuel, M.P.; Prince, M. Quality evaluation of solar and microwave dried shrimps-A comparative study on renewable and dielectric heating methods. Sol. Energy 2022, 246, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, D.-Y.; Li, N.; Dong, X.-H.; Tan, Z.-F.; Na, X.-K.; Liu, X.-Y.; Zhou, D.-Y. Effect of phytic acid combined with lactic acid on color and texture deterioration of ready-to-eat shrimps during storage. Food Chem. 2022, 396, 133702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rai, S.; Wai, P.P.; Koirala, P.; Bromage, S.; Nirmal, N.P.; Pandiselvam, R.; Nor-Khaizura, M.A.R.; Mehta, N.K. Food product quality, environmental and personal characteristics affecting consumer perception toward food. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2023, 7, 1222760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, S.; Lin, S.; Liang, R.; Liu, K.; Chen, X.; Chen, L.; Li, S.; Sun, N. Differentiation of antioxidants in reducing oxidation and improving quality of ready-to-eat roasted shrimp after thermal sterilization. Food Chem. 2024, 434, 137496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Empson, K.L.; Labuza, T.P.; Graf, E. Phytic acid as a food antioxidant. J. Food Sci. 1991, 56, 560–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Geng, J.; Takahashi, K.; Kaido, T.; Kasukawa, M.; Okazaki, E.; Osako, K. The effect of organic salts on the browning of dried squid products processed by air-drying. Food Chem. 2018, 269, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Grajales-Lagunes, A.; Rivera-Bautista, C.; Ruiz-Cabrera, M.; Gonzalez-Garcia, R.; Ramirez-Telles, J.; Abud-Archila, M. Effect of lactic acid on the meat quality properties and the taste of pork Serratus ventralis muscle. Agric. Food Sci. 2012, 21, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ke, S.M.; Huang, Y.; Decker, E.A.; Hultin, H.O. Impact of citric acid on the tenderness, microstructure and oxidative stability of beef muscle. Meat Sci. 2009, 82, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gilani, G.S.; Xiao, C.W.; Cockell, K.A. Impact of Antinutritional Factors in Food Proteins on the Digestibility of Protein and the Bioavailability of Amino Acids and on Protein Quality. Br. J. Nutr. 2012, 108, S315–S332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hashemi, B.; Madadlou, A.; Salami, M. Functional and in vitro gastric digestibility of the whey protein hydrogel loaded with nanostructured lipid carriers and gelled via citric acid-mediated crosslinking. Food Chem. 2017, 237, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kaspchak, E.; Bonassoli, A.B.G.; Iwankiw, P.K.; Kayukawa, C.T.M.; Igarashi-Mafra, L.; Mafra, M.R. Interactions of antinutrients mixtures with bovine serum albumin and its influence on in vitro protein digestibility. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 315, 113699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Qiu, C.Y.; Sun, W.Z.; Cui, C.; Zhao, M.M. Effect of citric acid deamidation on in vitro digestibility and antioxidant properties of wheat gluten. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 2772–2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Qi, H.; Yang, F.; Yu, D.; Liu, X.; Jiang, Q.; Xu, Y.; Yu, P.; Xia, W. Effect of color protectant on color and Maillard reaction of seasoned fish during sterilization. Food Ferment. Ind. 2020, 46, 136–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ajandouz, E.H.; Tchiakpe, L.S.; Dalle Ore, F.; Benajiba, A.; Puigserver, A. Effects of pH on caramelization and Maillard reaction kinetics in fructose-lysine model systems. J. Food Sci. 2001, 66, 926–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, D.; Xie, H.; Liu, Z.; Li, A.; Li, J.; Liu, B.; Liu, X.; Zhou, D. Shelf life prediction and changes in lipid profiles of dried shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) during accelerated storage. Food Chem. 2019, 297, 124951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Beveridge, T.; Toma, S.; Nakai, S. Determination of SH-groups and SS-groups in some food proteins using Ellman’s reagent. J. Food Sci. 1974, 39, 49–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ma, J.; Wang, X.; Li, Q.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Z.; Han, L.; Yu, Q. Oxidation of myofibrillar protein and crosslinking behavior during processing of traditional air-dried yak (Bos grunniens) meat in relation to digestibility. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 142, 110984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Santé-Lhoutellier, V.; Astruc, T.; Marinova, P.; Greve, E.; Gatellier, P. Effect of meat cooking on physicochemical state and in vitro digestibility of myofibrillar proteins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 1488–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vossen, E.; De Smet, S. Protein oxidation and protein nitration influenced by sodium nitrite in two different meat model systems. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 2550–2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lu, H.; Zhang, L.T.; Li, Q.Z.; Luo, Y.K. Comparison of gel properties and biochemical characteristics of myofibrillar protein from bighead carp (Aristichthys nobilis) affected by frozen storage and a hydroxyl radical-generation oxidizing system. Food Chem. 2017, 223, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Minekus, M.; Alminger, M.; Alvito, P.; Ballance, S.; Bohn, T.; Bourlieu, C.; Carrière, F.; Boutrou, R.; Corredig, M.; Dupont, D.; et al. A standardised static in vitro digestion method suitable for food-an international consensus. Food Funct. 2014, 5, 1113–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nielsen, P.M.; Petersen, D.; Dambmann, C. Improved method for determining food protein degree of hydrolysis. J. Food Sci. 2006, 66, 642–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fang, M.X.; Xiong, S.B.; Hu, Y.; Yin, T.; You, J. In vitro pepsin digestion of silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) surimi gels after cross-linking by Microbial Transglutaminase (MTGase). Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 95, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tlusty, M.; Hyland, C. Astaxanthin deposition in the cuticle of juvenile American lobster (Homarus americanus): Implications for phenotypic and genotypic coloration. Mar. Biol. 2005, 147, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Damasceno, M.d.S.P.; A Gonçalves, A. The effect of the food grade additive phosphate pre-treatment prior to the industrial cooking process in the quality of cooked peeled shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 3299–3306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ansorena, D.; De Peña, M.; Astiasarán, I.; Bello, J. Colour evaluation of chorizo de Pamplona, a Spanish dry fermented sausage: Comparison between the CIE L*a*b* and the Hunter Lab systems with illuminants D65 and C. Meat Sci. 1997, 46, 313–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ames, J.M. Applications of the Maillard reaction in the food industry. Food Chem. 1998, 62, 431–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cui, H.P.; Yu, J.Y.; Xia, S.Q.; Duhoranimana, E.; Huang, Q.R.; Zhang, X.M. Improved controlled flavor formation during heat-treatment with a stable Maillard reaction intermediate derived from xylose-phenylalanine. Food Chem. 2019, 271, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Luo, F.; Fei, X.Q. Maillard reaction derived from oil-tea camellia seed through roasting. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 5000–5007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Madruga, M.S.; Mottram, D.S. The effect of pH on the formation of maillard-derived aroma volatiles using a cooked meat system. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1995, 68, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shipar, A.H. Formation of the Heyns rearrangement products in dihydroxyacetone and glycine Maillard reaction: A computational study. Food Chem. 2006, 97, 231–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Van Boekel, M.A.J.S. Kinetic aspects of the Maillard reaction: A critical review. Food/Nahrung 2001, 45, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ramonaityte, D.T.; Kersience, M.; Adams, A.; Tehrani, K.A.; De Kimpe, N. The interaction of metal ions with Maillard reaction products in a lactose-glycine model system. Food Res. Int. 2009, 42, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cheah, P.B.; Ledward, D.A. Catalytic mechanism of lipid oxidation following high pressure treatment in pork fat and meat. J. Food Sci. 1997, 62, 1135–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kumar, M.R.; Prabhakar, S.; Kumar, M.K.; Reddy, T.J.; Vairamani, M. Dissociation of gas-phase dimeric complexes of lactic acid and transition-metal ions formed under electrospray ionization conditions; the role of reduction of the metal ion. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 19, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sanchis, P.; Rivera, R.; Berga, F.; Fortuny, R.; Adrover, M.; Costa-Bauza, A.; Grases, F.; Masmiquel, L. Phytate Decreases Formation of Advanced Glycation End-Products in Patients with Type II Diabetes: Randomized Crossover Trial. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 9619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Estevez, M.; Heinonen, M. Effect of phenolic compounds on the formation of α-aminoadipic and γ-glutamic semialdehydes from myofibrillar proteins oxidized by copper, iron, and myoglobin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 4448–4455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Glazer, A.N. Specific chemical modification of proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1970, 39, 101–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gatellier, P.; Kondjoyan, A.; Portanguen, S.; Santé-Lhoutellier, V. Effect of cooking on protein oxidation in n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids enriched beef. Implication on nutritional quality. Meat Sci. 2010, 85, 645–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nawaz, A.; Irshad, S.; Khan, I.A.; Khalifa, I.; Walayat, N.; Aadil, R.M.; Kumar, M.; Wang, M.; Chen, F.; Cheng, K.-W.; et al. Protein oxidation in muscle-based products: Effects on physicochemical properties, quality concerns, and challenges to food industry. Food Res. Int. 2022, 157, 111322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Álvarez-Armenta, A.; Corona-Martínez, D.O.; Pacheco-Aguilar, R.; López-Zavala, A.A.; Sotelo-Mundo, R.R.; García-Sánchez, G.; Ramírez-Suárez, J.C. Sulfmyoglobin production by free cysteine during thermal treatment: Involvement of heme iron in the production of free radicals. Food Chem. 2022, 408, 135165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hagglund, P.; Mariotti, M.; Davies, M.J. Identification and characterization of protein cross-links induced by oxidative reactions. Expert Rev. Proteom. 2018, 15, 665–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Promeyrat, A.; Le Louët, L.; Kondjoyan, A.; Astruc, T.; Santé-Lhoutellier, V.; Gatellier, P.; Daudin, J.D. Combined effect of meat composition and heating parameters on the physicochemical state of proteins. Procedia Food Sci. 2011, 1, 1118–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, B.; Yang, Y.; Ding, Y.; Ge, Y.; Xu, Y.; Xie, Y.; Shi, Y.; Le, G. Dityrosine in food: A review of its occurrence, health effects, detection methods, and mitigation strategies. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2023, 22, 355–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Malencik, D.A.; Sprouse, J.F.; Swanson, C.A.; Anderson, S.R. Dityrosine: Preparation, isolation, and analysis. Anal. Biochem. 1996, 242, 202–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Visschers, R.W.; de Jongh, H.H. Disulphide bond formation in food protein aggregation and gelation. Biotechnol. Adv. 2004, 23, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Niamnuy, C.; Devahastin, S.; Soponronnarit, S. Changes in protein compositions and their effects on physical changes of shrimp during boiling in salt solution. Food Chem. 2008, 108, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mehta, N.K.; Chouksey, M.K.; Balange, A.K.; Tripathi, G.; Nayak, B.B. Physicochemical and gel properties of myofibrillar protein from Sin Croaker (Johnius dussumieri) fish during ice storage. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol. 2017, 26, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xu, H.; Shen, L.; Xu, L.; Yang, Y. Low-temperature crosslinking of proteins using non-toxic citric acid in neutral aqueous medium: Mechanism and kinetic study. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 74, 234–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lyu, M.; Liu, H.; Ye, Y.; Yin, Z. Inhibition effect of thiol-type antioxidants on protein oxidative aggregation caused by free radicals. Biophys. Chem. 2020, 260, 106367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Xu, H.; Shen, L.; Xu, L.; Yang, Y. Controlled delivery of hollow corn protein nanoparticles via non-toxic crosslinking: In vivo and drug loading study. Biomed. Microdevices 2015, 17, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Darby, S.J.; Platts, L.; Daniel, M.S.; Cowieson, A.J.; Falconer, R.J. An isothermal titration calorimetry study of phytate binding to lysozyme. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2017, 127, 1201–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rakotondramavo, A.; Rabesona, H.; Brou, C.; de Lamballerie, M.; Pottier, L. Ham processing: Effects of tumbling, cooking and high pressure on proteins. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2019, 245, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kaspchak, E.; Silveira, J.L.M.; Igarashi-Mafra, L.; Mafra, M.R. Effect of antinutrients on heat-set gelation of soy, pea, and rice protein isolates. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 4201–4210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, T.; Wang, C.; Li, T.; Ma, L.; Sun, D.; Hou, J.; Jiang, Z. Surface Hydrophobicity and Functional Properties of Citric Acid Cross-Linked Whey Protein Isolate: The Impact of pH and Concentration of Citric Acid. Molecules 2018, 23, 2383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cardamone, M.; Puri, N.K. Spectrofluorometric assessment of the surface hydrophobicity of proteins. Biochem. J. 1992, 282, 589–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sante-Lhoutellier, V.; Aubry, L.; Gatellier, P. Effect of oxidation on in vitro digestibility of skeletal muscle myofibrillar proteins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 5343–5348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rutherfurd, S.M. Methodology for Determining Degree of Hydrolysis of Proteins in Hydrolysates: A. Review. J. AOAC Int. 2010, 93, 1515–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dong, L.; Wu, Y.; Wang, W.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, S. Structural modification and digestibility change of β-lactoglobulin modified by methylglyoxal with the simulated reheating of dairy products. Food Chem. 2019, 288, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Pictures after boiling (A); pictures after sterilization (B); and changes in L* (C), a* (D), b* (E), W* (F), and sensory evaluation (G) of RTE shrimp with different treatments. Con, PA + LA, PA + CA, and PA + LA + CA represent shrimp soaked in different solutions (water, 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA solution, 0.04% PA + 0.2% CA solution, and 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA + 0.2% CA solution, respectively) at 4 °C for 3 h. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Pictures after boiling (A); pictures after sterilization (B); and changes in L* (C), a* (D), b* (E), W* (F), and sensory evaluation (G) of RTE shrimp with different treatments. Con, PA + LA, PA + CA, and PA + LA + CA represent shrimp soaked in different solutions (water, 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA solution, 0.04% PA + 0.2% CA solution, and 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA + 0.2% CA solution, respectively) at 4 °C for 3 h. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Foods 13 00388 g001aFoods 13 00388 g001b
Figure 2. Changes in ultraviolet absorption A295 (A),browning index A420 (B), and TBARs (C) of RTE shrimp with different treatments. Con, PA + LA, PA + CA, and PA + LA + CA represent shrimp soaked in different solutions (water, 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA solution, 0.04% PA + 0.2% CA solution, and 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA + 0.2% CA solution, respectively) at 4 °C for 3 h. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Changes in ultraviolet absorption A295 (A),browning index A420 (B), and TBARs (C) of RTE shrimp with different treatments. Con, PA + LA, PA + CA, and PA + LA + CA represent shrimp soaked in different solutions (water, 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA solution, 0.04% PA + 0.2% CA solution, and 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA + 0.2% CA solution, respectively) at 4 °C for 3 h. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Foods 13 00388 g002
Figure 3. Changes in carbonyl content (A) and free thiol (B) of RTE shrimp with different treatments. Con, PA + LA, PA + CA, and PA + LA + CA represent shrimp soaked in different solutions (water, 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA solution, 0.04% PA + 0.2% CA solution, and 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA + 0.2% CA solution, respectively) at 4 °C for 3 h. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Changes in carbonyl content (A) and free thiol (B) of RTE shrimp with different treatments. Con, PA + LA, PA + CA, and PA + LA + CA represent shrimp soaked in different solutions (water, 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA solution, 0.04% PA + 0.2% CA solution, and 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA + 0.2% CA solution, respectively) at 4 °C for 3 h. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Foods 13 00388 g003
Figure 4. Changes in dityrosine (A) and disulfide bonds (B) of RTE shrimp with different treatments. Con, PA + LA, PA + CA and PA + LA + CA represent shrimp soaked in different solutions (water, 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA solution, 0.04% PA + 0.2% CA solution, and 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA + 0.2% CA solution, respectively) at 4 °C for 3 h. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Changes in dityrosine (A) and disulfide bonds (B) of RTE shrimp with different treatments. Con, PA + LA, PA + CA and PA + LA + CA represent shrimp soaked in different solutions (water, 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA solution, 0.04% PA + 0.2% CA solution, and 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA + 0.2% CA solution, respectively) at 4 °C for 3 h. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Foods 13 00388 g004
Figure 5. Changes in protein aggregation (A), salt-soluble protein solubility (B), and surface hydrophobic (C) of RTE shrimp with different treatments. Con, PA + LA, PA + CA, and PA + LA + CA represent shrimp soaked in different solutions (water, 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA solution, 0.04% PA + 0.2% CA solution, and 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA + 0.2% CA solution, respectively) at 4 °C for 3 h. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Changes in protein aggregation (A), salt-soluble protein solubility (B), and surface hydrophobic (C) of RTE shrimp with different treatments. Con, PA + LA, PA + CA, and PA + LA + CA represent shrimp soaked in different solutions (water, 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA solution, 0.04% PA + 0.2% CA solution, and 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA + 0.2% CA solution, respectively) at 4 °C for 3 h. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Foods 13 00388 g005
Figure 6. Changes in gastric DH (A), gastrointestinal DH (B), gastric digestibility (C), gastrointestinal digestibility (D), and correlation analysis (E) of RTE shrimp with different treatments. Con, PA + LA, PA + CA, and PA + LA + CA represent shrimp soaked in different solutions (water, 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA solution, 0.04% PA + 0.2% CA solution, and 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA + 0.2% CA solution, respectively) at 4 °C for 3 h. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 6. Changes in gastric DH (A), gastrointestinal DH (B), gastric digestibility (C), gastrointestinal digestibility (D), and correlation analysis (E) of RTE shrimp with different treatments. Con, PA + LA, PA + CA, and PA + LA + CA represent shrimp soaked in different solutions (water, 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA solution, 0.04% PA + 0.2% CA solution, and 0.04% PA + 0.2% LA + 0.2% CA solution, respectively) at 4 °C for 3 h. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Foods 13 00388 g006aFoods 13 00388 g006b
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, C.; Fan, Y.; Wu, Z.; Li, D.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, D. Effects of Edible Organic Acid Soaking on Color, Protein Physicochemical, and Digestion Characteristics of Ready-to-Eat Shrimp upon Processing and Sterilization. Foods 2024, 13, 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13030388

AMA Style

Guo C, Fan Y, Wu Z, Li D, Liu Y, Zhou D. Effects of Edible Organic Acid Soaking on Color, Protein Physicochemical, and Digestion Characteristics of Ready-to-Eat Shrimp upon Processing and Sterilization. Foods. 2024; 13(3):388. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13030388

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Chao, Yingchen Fan, Zixuan Wu, Deyang Li, Yuxin Liu, and Dayong Zhou. 2024. "Effects of Edible Organic Acid Soaking on Color, Protein Physicochemical, and Digestion Characteristics of Ready-to-Eat Shrimp upon Processing and Sterilization" Foods 13, no. 3: 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13030388

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop