Next Article in Journal
Detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Based on Magnetic and Upconversion Nanoparticles Combined with Aptamers
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Diacylglycerol Crystallization on W/O/W Emulsion Stability, Controlled Release Properties and In Vitro Digestibility
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Isothermal Amplification and CRISPR/Cas12a-System-Based Assay for Rapid, Sensitive and Visual Detection of Staphylococcus aureus

1
School of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201499, China
2
Key Laboratory of Agricultural Genetics and Breeding, The Biotechnology Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201106, China
3
Crops Ecological Environment Security Inspection and Supervision Center, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shanghai 201106, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(24), 4432; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12244432
Submission received: 6 November 2023 / Revised: 21 November 2023 / Accepted: 30 November 2023 / Published: 11 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Food Analytical Methods)

Abstract

:
Staphylococcus aureus exists widely in the natural environment and is one of the main food-borne pathogenic microorganisms causing human bacteremia. For safe food management, a rapid, high-specificity, sensitive method for the detection of S. aureus should be developed. In this study, a platform for detecting S. aureus (nuc gene) based on isothermal amplification (loop-mediated isothermal amplification—LAMP, recombinase polymerase amplification—RPA) and the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated (Cas12a) proteins system (LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a) was proposed. In this study, the LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a detection platform and immunochromatographic test strip (ICS) were combined to achieve a low-cost, simple and visualized detection of S. aureus. The limit of visual detection was 57.8 fg/µL of nuc DNA and 6.7 × 102 CFU/mL of bacteria. Moreover, the platform could be combined with fluorescence detection, namely LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-flu, to establish a rapid and highly sensitive method for the detection of S. aureus. The limit of fluorescence detection was 5.78 fg/µL of genomic DNA and 67 CFU/mL of S. aureus. In addition, this detection platform can detect S. aureus in dairy products, and the detection time was ~40 min. Consequently, the isothermal amplification CRISPR/Cas12a platform is a useful tool for the rapid and sensitive detection of S. aureus in food.

1. Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus [1], one of the top five foodborne pathogens, has a common and strong aggressiveness in humans and can secrete multiple toxic proteins (Pathogenic enterotoxins, Hemolysin, PVL) [1,2] which can cause bacteraemia, endocarditis, meningitis, toxic shock syndrome, pneumonia and other dangerous infectious diseases [3]. Moreover, the worldwide annual incidence rate of bacteremia is 15–40 cases per 100,000 people [4]. S. aureus bacteraemia is associated with a mortality rate of about 15–25% [4]. S. aureus is widely found in a variety of environments, such as air, water, livestock, poultry and their waste, making food vulnerable to contamination [5], and in the United States, there are approximately 241,000 cases of foodborne illness caused by S. aureus each year [6]. Therefore, the possibility of the direct or indirect contamination of food with S. aureus increases, greatly increasing the risk of infections.
Traditional detection methods, such as culture-based counting for colony-forming units, heterotrophic plate counts, the spectrophotometer method of optical density measurement and flow cytometry, are simple but need bacteria enrichment and to prolong detection time [7]. Immunoassay methods, for instance, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, enzyme-linked fluoroimmunoassay and immunomagnetic bead separation, are easy to automate but have a degree of complicated operation and long incubation time [8,9,10]. Contrarily, the immunochromatographic test strip (ICS) has been widely used as a rapid, simple and low-cost correct detection technology [11]. Recently, biosensors based on electrochemistry, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight [12] and surface-enhanced Raman scattering have attracted widespread attention [13]. However, these methods usually require skilled operators and expensive, large-scale instruments, which are not conducive to point-of-care testing (POCT).
Molecular methods, such as multiple polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [14,15] and real-time PCR [15,16,17,18], have also been used for bacterial quantification and identification, but PCR- and RT-PCR-based detection methods require sophisticated thermal cyclers and are time-consuming. In recent years, the isothermal amplification technique (e.g., loop-mediated isothermal amplification, LAMP; recombinase polymerase amplification, RPA) has developed rapidly because of its advantages of high sensitivity, specificity, convenience and simple laboratory equipment, even if water baths or heating blocks are sufficient to provide the essential conditions [19,20,21]. However, the isothermal amplification technique used alone has a high susceptibility to cause false-positive amplification, due to cross-contamination, nonspecific amplification or primer dimerization [22].
The CRISPR/Cas (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and CRISPR-associated proteins) is an adaptive immunity system in bacteria and archaea [23]. Cas12a is a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system [24], and Cas12a enzymes recognize a T-nucleotide-rich protospacer-adjacent motif, catalyze their own guide CRISPR RNA (crRNA) maturation and generate a PAM-distal dsDNA break with staggered 5′ and 3′ ends, thus having attracted interest for gene-editing applications like in zebrafish [25,26]. Until 2018, Li et al. confirmed that the trans-cleavage activities and target DNA binding also induced the cleavage of non-target DNA of Cas12a, and they developed HOLMES, which can be used for the fast detection of target DNA [27]. To improve the sensitivity of HOLMES, Cheng et al. combined HOLMES with PCR, and the detectable concentration could reached 10 aM [28].
At present, researchers have combined CRISPR/Cas12a and nucleic acid amplification for the detection of various viruses and microbes. Chaijarasphong et al. coupled a CRISPR-Cas12a fluorescence assay with RPA for the detection of white spot syndrome virus in shrimp [29]. Lee et al. established a detection platform combining a LAMP isothermal amplification system and CRISPR/Cas12a system for the detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 [20]. CRISPR/Cas12a has the potential for rapid, low-cost and non-toxic sequencing of targeted nucleic acids.
In this study, a highly sensitive, visual, rapid and specific sensing strategy named LAMP/RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS and -flu for detecting S. aureus (nuc gene) was developed. The strategy integrated isothermal amplification methods (RPA, LAMP) with the CRISPR/Cas12a system to eliminate false positives generated by isothermal amplification. We combined LAMP/RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a with the ICS to achieve the visual and fast detection of S. aureus, and also combined this with fluorescence detection, namely LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-flu, to achieve the high-sensitivity detection of S. aureus.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Materials

The bacteria involved in this study include two species of S. aureus and eleven other common foodborne pathogens, as shown in Table S1. The primers, crRNA and ssDNA were synthesized by Sangon (Shanghai, China). The TIANamp Bacteria DNA Kit model DP302, WarmStart LAMP Kit model E1700S, RPA assay kits, rNase Inhibitor and LbCpf1 Nuclease were acquired from Tiangen (Beijing, China), New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA, USA), TwistDx (Cambridge, MA, USA), Tolo (Shanghai, China), Bersee (Beijing, China) and BBI (Shanghai, China), respectively. Biotin ligand-streptavidin, goat anti-rabbit antibody, BSA and anti-FITC antibody (15 nm gold-nanoparticle-labeled) were purchased from Beijing Bersee (Beijing, China), Merck (Shanghai, China), Beijing Biosynthesis Biotechnology (Beijing, China) and Beijing Solarbio (Beijing, China), respectively. Nitrocellulose (NC) membrane (CN95 and CN140), cellulose fiber (absorbent pads), fiberglass mat (sample pads and conjugate pads) and PVC backing plates were purchased from Merck Chemicals (Shanghai, China). The chemicals and solvents involved in this paper were analytical-grade. A total of 24 samples were included in this study. Four samples (milk, modulated milk, orange juice and soymilk) were purchased at the local supermarket (Ru Hai, Shanghai, China). Information on the remaining 20 natural samples is listed in Table S2.

2.2. Genomic DNA Extraction and Primer Design

All bacteria were cultured overnight and the cultivation conditions are shown in Table S1. Genomic DNA extracted from TIANamp Bacteria DNA Kit model DP302 was used for the detection of the nuc gene due to its high purity. The extracted genome concentration was determined using NanoDrop 2000c (Thermo Fisher Scientific 5225 Verona Rd Madison, WI53711 Assembled in USA, Waltham, MA, USA) and stored at −20 °C for future use. Bacterial DNA extraction Mini Kit (Mabio, Guangzhou, China) was used to extract genomic DNA for the detection of S. aureus due to its fast extraction speed.
Whole-genome sequences of 32 S. aureus were retrieved from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) to mine specific targets for S. aureus (names and accession numbers of 32 strains of S. aureus are shown in Table S3). Through local BLASTN comparison, a specific gene (nuc GenBank: DQ507382.1) to detect S. aureus was obtained. The RPA and PCR primers used in this study were designed from Primer Premier 5.0 (Premier Biosoft, San Francisco, CA, USA, Toronto, ON, Canada). And the LAMP primers and crRNA were designed through the website (http://primerexplorer.jp/ (accessed on 5 January 2022), CRISPOR (tefor.net)). All the detailed information is shown in Table S4.

2.3. Construction of ICS

The composition of ICS is shown in Figure 1. In detail, the gold nanoparticle (AuNP)-labeled anti-FITC antibodies (2 µg) were stored in the conjugate pad, and the AuNPs were used for coloration. The BioDot-XYZ3060 point drug system (Bio-Dot, Irvine, CA, USA) was used to distribute 2 mg/mL streptavidin and 1 mg/mL goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody on the NC filter membrane in a volume of 3 µL to form control lines (C-line) and test lines (T-lines). The NC filter membrane, coupling pad, sample pad and absorption pad were assembled in sequence on the plastic backplane overlapping each other by 2 mm. Finally, the ICS was cut into 3 mm wide strips using the CM4000 cutter (Bio-Dot, Irvine, CA, USA).

2.4. LAMP, RPA and PCR Assay for S. aureus

For LAMP reaction, 12.5 µL 2 × Master Mix, 2.5 µL 10 × LAMP primers, 8 µL ddH2O and 2 µL DNA template were added successively and mixed evenly. The reaction condition was incubated at 62.7 °C for 30 min.
The RPA process was performed according to the RPA kit’s instructions. Firstly, 29.5 µL Buffer was mixed with 11.2 µL ddH2O and 2.4 µL primer to completely dissolve the enzyme powder. Then, 2 µL DNA template was added and mixed thoroughly. Finally, 2.5 µL MgOAc was added to start the reaction and incubated at 37.7 °C for 15 min. LAMP and RPA results were observed using agarose gel electrophoresis using DL2000 Marker.
PCR amplification was carried out in a 20 μL reaction system, containing 2 μL of template DNA, 1 μL of each primer (10 nM), 12.5 μL of 2 × Taq mix (Sangon Biotech; Shanghai, China), 3.5 μL ddH2O. PCR analysis was performed using the following procedures: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s, annealing at 58 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 20 s, with a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min.

2.5. LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS and the LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-Flu Assay

The CRISPR/Cas12a reaction system consisted of 50 nM LbCpf1 nucleases, 10 U RNase inhibitor, 500 nM crRNA, 500 nM ssDNA reporter, 2 µL NE buffer, 2 µL DNA template in a 20 µL reaction volume. The DNA template was the LAMP or RPA product, and the ssDNA was a non-targeting probe. The ssDNA reporter of ICS was biotin- and FITC-double-labeled (5′-Biotin-TTATT-FITC-3′), and flu-ssDNA reporter (5′-HEX-10T-BHQ1-3′) was designed for fluorescence detection. Then, the reaction was incubated at 37 °C for 15 min.
For LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS analysis, 5 µL of the cleavage product was loaded to the sample pad, and the ICS was then placed in phosphate-buffered solution, according to the direction indicated for 5 min. Then, the results were directly obtained through visual detection. The fluorescence intensity of ssDNA cleavage reaction products was analyzed using LAMP and RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-flu. The relative fluorescence intensity was measured using the multi-purpose microplate reader (Tecan, Mannedorf, Switzerland), with excitation and emission wavelengths of 530 nm and 560 nm, respectively. The detection process was described in our previous report [30].

2.6. Optimization of Reaction Conditions for LAMP and RPA Based on the CRISPR/Cas12a-Flu Platform

The temperature and time of LAMP and RPA reactions were optimized using the CRISPR/Cas12a-flu platform. The temperature of LAMP-CRISPR/Cas12a platform was optimized at 58~70 °C for 60 min, and then the time was optimized from 0 to ~60 min at the optimum temperature. Similarly, the temperature of RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a platform was optimized at 37~48 °C for 20 min, and then the time was optimized from ~15 to ~30 min at the optimum temperature. The genome concentration used was 106 fg/µL.

2.7. Specificity and Sensitivity of LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a Platform

The specificity of the LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a platform was determined through the detection of the DNA template of two S. spp. (S. xylosus; S. mimicus) and nine non-S. spp. strains (Table S1) to assess.
To evaluate the genomic sensitivity and bacterial sensitivity of LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a platforms, the genomic DNA and S. aureus were diluted tenfold to a concentration of 5.8 × 106 fg/µL to 5.8 fg/µL (equivalent to a molar concentration of 3.2 × 105 fM to 0.32 fM) and 6.7 × 106 CFU/mL to 6.7 CFU/mL respectively. DNase/RNase-free distilled water was used as a non-template control.

2.8. Sample Validation

The Chinese official national food safety standard GB29921-2021 [31]sets the limit of detection (LOD) for S. aureus at 103 CFU/mL. A lower concentration (102 CFU/mL) was added to samples (milk, reconstituted milk, orange juice and soya milk). As the matrix in the actual samples had an impact on the extraction of S. aureus DNA, the culture method in GB 4789.10-2010 [32] was used to incubate the strains at 37 °C for 6 h. After culture and extraction, the concentration of S. aureus was 105 CFU/mL, and the concentrations of the S. aureus genome in milk, reconstituted milk, orange juice and soya milk were 15 ng/µL, 10 ng/µL, 4 ng/µL and 9 ng/µL, respectively.
Then, DNA of samples was extracted using the previously described Alkaline Lysis (AL) method [33]. Briefly, one part of sample (1 mL) was collected through centrifugation (12,000× g for 2 min) and resuspended in 25 µL of sterile distilled water. Then, 25 µL of 50 mM NaOH was added to the bacterial suspension before it was incubated at 100 °C for 10 min. After neutralization with 4 µL of 1 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.5), the supernatant was used as template DNA.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

The data treatment was consistent with our previous study [34]. Briefly, data analysis and graphing were performed using SPSS 23.0 (IBM Crop., Chicago, IL, USA) and Origin 2021 (Northampton, MA, USA). Each result was obtained using the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments.

3. Results

3.1. Principle of LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a Platform

To detect S. aureus in food quickly, specifically and sensitively, a LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a detector platform was successfully established by combining ICS and fluorescence detection. The detection process of the LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a platform is shown in Figure 1. Four steps were used to detect S. aureus, including the (i) extraction of S. aureus genomic DNA from the sample mixture, (ii) amplification of S. aureus genomic DNA using LAMP or RPA, (iii) identification and cleavage of the target gene nuc using the CRISPR/Cas12a system and (iv) release signals for ICS or fluorescence detection.
When the crRNA recognizes the amplified target sequence, the trans-cleavage activity of the binary complex was stimulated, and the ssDNA reporter genes in the reaction solution was cleaved to release the detection signal. In the LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-flu platform, the quencher BHQ1 was separated from the fluorochrome HEX, resulting in the production of fluorescence signals. Without target sequences, trans cleavage was inactive, and no fluorescence signal was produced. In the LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS platform, when trans-cleavage was activated, the ICS-ssDNA reporter was cleaved to produce two ssDNA fragments labeled by biotin and FITC, respectively. Then, the ssDNA fragments labeled by FITC were combined with gold nanoparticle (AuNP)-labeled anti-FITC antibodies and formed a new complex on the conjugate pad. With the capillary action, the complex moved to the T-line and combined with the goat anti-mouse IgG antibody, making the T-line red.

3.2. Primer Screening of LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a Platform

To improve the sensitivity of the LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a platform, four LAMP and RPA primers were designed for screening. The LAMP-2 primers showed strong target bands and the highest amplification efficiency (Figure 2(A1)). The RPA-3 (Figure 2(B1)) primers showed clear bands and no primer dimerization of the negative control. Two and three crRNAs were separately designed for LAMP and RPA to provide cleavage efficiency for the LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a platform. The fluorescence values and ratios of the designed crRNA and the negative control were measured using the microplate reader and are listed in Table S5. crRNA-1 (Figure 2(A2)) and crRNA-2 (Figure 2(A3)) with the highest proportion were selected for subsequent experiments.

3.3. Optimization of LAMP and RPA Reaction Conditions for LAMP-CRISPR/Cas12a System

Temperature optimization results of LAMP showed that the relative fluorescence intensity was the highest at 62.7 °C (Figure 3(A1)), which was consistent with the results of gel electrophoresis (Figure 3(A3)). The time optimization results showed that the relative fluorescence intensity was highest at 30 min (Figure 3(A2)) and, at the same time, bands appeared in the gel electrophoresis. In order to shorten the detection time, the optimal LAMP conditions were determined as 62.7 °C for 30 min. When the amplification temperature of RPA was 37.7 °C, the fluorescence intensity was highest (Figure 3(B1)), and the band in gel electrophoresis (Figure 3(B3)) was the brightest. After reacting for 15 min, strong fluorescence signals (Figure 3(B2)) and bands (Figure 3(B4)) appeared; thus, the RPA reaction condition was 37.7 °C for 15 min.

3.4. Specificity of LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a Platform

To ensure the specificity of the LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a platform, eleven strains, including two S. spp (S. xylosus; S. mimicus) and nine non-S. spp. strains, are presented in Table S1. In fact, the T-line displays a strong signal only when the target strain genome is present. Strains without nuc genes display weak bands on the T-line, which can produce significant differences from strains with nuc genes on the T-line (Figure 4(A1,B1)). In addition, in order to quantitatively analyze the results, ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) analysis was performed on the detection-specific results of LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS platforms (Figure S1). Similarly, as shown in Figure 4(A2,B2), only the target strain had a strong fluorescent signal (p < 0.05), which was consistent with the electrophoretic results (Figure 4(A3,B3)). Thus, the LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a platform exhibited acceptable specificity.

3.5. Sensitivity of LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a Platform

To detect the sensitivity, the nuc gene at levels from 5.78 × 106 fg/µL to 5.78 fg/µL (3.2 × 105 fM to 0.32 fM) and S. aureus at levels from 6.7 × 106 CFU/mL to 6.7 CFU/mL were prepared. LODs of the nuc gene detected using the LAMP-CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS (Figure 5(A1)) and LAMP-CRISPR/Cas12a-flu (Figure 5(A3)) platforms and gel electrophoresis (Figure 5(A5)) were all 5.78 × 102 fg/µL. The RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS platform had an LOD of 57.8 fg/µL for the detection of the nuc gene (Figure 5(A2)), which was consistent with the gel electrophoretic results (Figure 5(A6)). However, compared with RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS and gel electrophoretic methods, the RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-flu platform had a higher LOD of 5.78 fg/µL (Figure 5(A4)).
Consistent with the genomic sensitivity results, the LAMP-CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS (Figure 5(B1)) and LAMP-CRISPR/Cas12a-flu (Figure 5(B3)) platforms and gel electrophoresis (Figure 5(B5)) had the same LOD of 6.7 × 102 CFU/mL for the detection of S. aureus. And the RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS (Figure 5(B2)) platform and gel electrophoresis (Figure 5(B6)) had an LOD of 6.7 × 102 CFU/mL for the detection of S. aureus. However, the RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-flu (Figure 5(A3)) platform had a higher LOD of 67 CFU/mL (Figure 5(B4)).

3.6. Evaluation of the Practical Value of LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a Platform

To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of LAMP and RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a platforms in practical applications, samples contaminated with S. aureus at different concentrations and 20 natural samples were detected. The results showed that LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS (Figure 6(A2,B2)) and LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-flu (Figure 6(A3,B3)) platforms were able to detect pathogenic S. aureus, which was consistent with the results of gel electrophoresis (Figure 6(A1,B1)). Thus, our developed LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a platform could be applied to identify the possible contamination by S. aureus in different foods. Among the 20 real samples, three samples were found to be contaminated by S. aureus. The detection results (Figure 6C) had a 100% consistency between our assay and the PCR method, indicating that the LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a platform had high accuracy.

4. Discussions

The detection of S. aureus in food is essential to ensure food safety, which helps people avoid the occurrence of foodborne illnesses caused by the consumption of food contaminated with this bacterium [35]. Nucleic-acid-based assays such as PCR, real-time PCR and ddPCR can identify ingredients with high sensitivity but require bulky instrumentation and long assay times [36]. While LAMP and RPA are isothermal technologies that require only minimum laboratorial support and can be easily employed on-site, in this study, the constant-temperature amplification technology was used to amplify the fragment, which reduced the detection time and instrument cost. The LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a system was combined with a lateral flow biosensor and fluorescence intensity detection to form the LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS platform and the LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-flu platform for the detection of S. aureus. The specific amplification of target DNA by LAMP or RPA and the trans-cleavage activity of activated Cas12a/crRNA greatly enhanced the detection signal [37,38].
Studies have shown that false positive results for negative controls are often observed when the LAMP takes more than 30 min. And isothermal amplification such as LAMP and RPA are prone to non-specific amplification. However, the CRISPR/Cas12a system, which is sequence-specific, can identify amplification products in the region with continuous PAM sites, and then distinguish between positive and false-positive results, providing higher specificity [20].
In this study, two detection systems of the LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a detection platform for S. aureus have been established with high specificity, which can exclude the interference of complex matrices. In general, the detection limit for RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a was higher than that for LAMP-CRISPR/Cas12a, which may be due to the fact that there were four primers in the LAMP, and the conditions for binding targets were relatively high. Among them, fluorescence detection was used, and the LOD (5.78 fg/μL) reached in this study is 103 times higher than that in the method of Cao et al. (103 fg/μL) [38]. In addition, the sensitivity of S. aureus was also studied with an LOD of 67 CFU/mL, which had not been performed before [39,40]. The LAMP-CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS method requires no other instruments except metal baths, and the RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS platform can be performed without instruments. The RPA and enzyme digestion processes can be carried out without laboratory conditions by holding the reaction tube by hand to provide temperature, and the results can be directly observed with the naked eye. This allows for visualization and device independence. Due to its portability and ease of operation, the system could be used for on-site inspection. The LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-flu detection system could meet the need for higher-sensitivity detection.
Therefore, the thermostatic amplification-CRISPR/Cas12a detection platform could be combined with a variety of biosensors for the detection of foodborne pathogens or viruses, transgenic crops, etc.

5. Conclusions

S. aureus is one of the main pathogenic bacteria causing global foodborne disease outbreaks. In this study, the LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a platform for the detection of S. aureus with high sensitivity, high specificity, visualization and device independence was successfully constructed. For the RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-flu platform, low concentrations of 5.78 fg/µL and 67 CFU/mL can be detected for the nuc gene and S. aureus, respectively. The LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS platform does not require special equipment during the inspection process and can be visually detected within 30 min. Therefore, the LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a detection platform can meet the needs of POCT detection of S. aureus, which is of great significance for food safety supervision and clinical diagnosis. More importantly, it can be used not only for the detection of S. aureus, but also for other pathogens and viruses based on different target crRNA.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods12244432/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.W. and J.W.; Methodology, D.X., H.Z. and H.L.; Formal analysis, D.X. and J.W.; Investigation, H.L.; Writing—original draft, D.X.; Writing—review & editing, H.Z. and W.W.; Supervision, H.Z., H.L. and J.W.; Funding acquisition, H.Z. and W.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the SciTech Funding by CSPFTZ Lingang Special Area Marine Biomedical Innovation Platform, Shanghai Frontiers Research Center of the Hadal Biosphere, Shanghai Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan (21N31900800), Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82173731).

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential or actual conflict of interest. The authors also declare that they will apply for one patent using the results of this study.

References

  1. Zhao, Y.Y.; Xia, D.D.; Ma, P.P.; Gao, X.F.; Kang, W.Y.; Wei, J.F. Advances in the detection of virulence genes of Staphylococcus aureus originate from food. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2020, 9, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhai, Y.; Yu, H.Y.; Liu, X.X.; Zhang, M.F.; Han, R.P.; Yin, C.H.; Liu, X.C.; Li, H.; Li, J.; Song, X.L. Visual detection of Staphylococcus aureus based on immunomagnetic separation and polymerase spiral reaction. Food Control 2023, 147, 109621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lin, L.Y.; Zha, G.G.; Wei, H.G.; Zheng, Y.Z.; Yang, P.K.; Liu, Y.Q.; Liu, M.Q.; Wang, Z.H.; Zou, X.H.; Zhu, H.; et al. Rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus in food safety using an RPA-CRISPR-Cas12a assay. Food Control 2023, 145, 109505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ziegler, I.; Cajander, S.; Rasmussen, G.; Ennefors, T.; Mölling, P.; Strålin, K. High nuc DNA load in whole blood is associated with sepsis, mortality and immune dysregulation in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Infect. Dis. 2019, 51, 216–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ding, Y.; Huang, C.; Chen, M.; Wang, J.; Shao, Y.; Wang, X. Rapid and simultaneous detection of viable S. aureus and its penicillin susceptibility by phage amplification techniques in different food matrices. LWT 2023, 176, 114526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; Yang, H.; Wei, H. Sensitive and rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus in milk via cell binding domain of lysin. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 77, 366–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chai, Z.L.; Soko, W.C.; Jing, X.; Bi, H.Y. Microchip coupled with MALDI-TOF MS for the investigation of bacterial contamination of fish muscle products. Food Chem. 2022, 396, 133658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xing, J.; Chang, Y.H.; Tang, X.Q.; Sheng, X.Z.; Zhan, W.B. Separation of haemocyte subpopulations in shrimp Fenneropenaeus chinensis by immunomagnetic bead using monoclonal antibody against granulocytes. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2017, 60, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nouri, A.; Ahari, H.; Shahbazzadeh, D. Designing a direct ELISA kit for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin A in raw milk samples. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 107, 1732–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Necidová, L.; Bursová, Š.; Haruštiaková, D.; Bogdanovičová, K.; Lačanin, I. Effect of heat treatment on activity of staphylococcal enterotoxins of type A, B, and C in milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 3924–3932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, T.; Wang, H.B.; Zhong, Z.T.; Li, C.Q.; Chen, W.; Liu, B.; Zhao, Y.D. A smartphone-based rapid quantitative detection platform for lateral flow strip of human chorionic gonadotropin with optimized image algorithm. Microchem. J. 2020, 157, 105038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shen, Y.Q.; Yi, J.; Song, M.H.; Li, D.D.; Wu, Y.J.; Liu, Y.J.; Yang, M.C.; Qiao, L. Highly efficient enrichment and identification of pathogens using a herringbone microfluidic chip and by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Analyst 2021, 146, 4146–4153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ye, Y.F.; Qi, X.Y.; Wang, H.; Zhao, B.B.; Xu, L.X.; Zhang, Y.T.; Wang, X.L.; Zhou, N.D. A surface-enhanced Raman scattering aptasensor for Escherichia coli detection based on high-performance 3D substrate and hot spot effect. Anal. Chim. Acta 2022, 1221, 340141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, C.; Zhang, R.H.; Wang, X.F.; Xu, R.; Yan, H.J.; Li, X.R.; Liu, S.J.; Yin, S.R.; Yao, H.; Yang, Y.; et al. Use of nano titanium hydroxide and nano zirconium hydroxide fixed filter paper for rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus in dairy products by PCR without pre-enrichment. Food Control 2023, 148, 109664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chamchoy, T.; Okello, E.; Williams, D.R.; Tonooka, K.; Glenn, K.; Maehana, K.; Gardner, I.A.; Aly, S.S. Bayesian estimation of sensitivity and specificity of a rapid mastitis test kit, bacterial culture, and PCR for detection of Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus species, and coliforms in bovine milk samples. J. Dairy Sci. 2022, 105, 6240–6250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Harada, T.; Wakabayashi, Y.; Seto, K.; Lee, K.; Iyoda, S.; Kawatsu, K. Real-time PCR assays to detect 10 Shiga toxin subtype (Stx1a, Stx1c, Stx1d, Stx2a, Stx2b, Stx2c, Stx2d, Stx2e, Stx2f, and Stx2g) genes. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2023, 105, 115874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Xie, X.Q.; Liu, Z. Simultaneous enumeration of Cronobacter sakazakii and Staphylococcus aureus in powdered infant foods through duplex TaqMan real-time PCR. Int. Dairy J. 2021, 117, 105019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yoon, J.-H.; Wei, S.; Oh, D.-H. A highly selective enrichment broth combined with real-time PCR for detection of Staphylococcus aureus in food samples. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 94, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gao, S.; Liu, J.W.; Li, Z.Y.; Ma, Y.; Wang, J.F. Sensitive detection of foodborne pathogens based on CRISPR-Cas13a. J. Food Sci. 2021, 86, 2615–2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, S.Y.; Oh, S.W. Filtration-based LAMP-CRISPR/Cas12a system for the rapid, sensitive and visualized detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Talanta 2022, 241, 123186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Martzy, R.; Kolm, C.; Krska, R.; Mach, R.L.; Farnleitner, A.H.; Reischer, G.H. Challenges and perspectives in the application of isothermal DNA amplification methods for food and water analysis. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2019, 411, 1695–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lee, S.Y.; Oh, S.W. Lateral flow biosensor based on LAMP-CRISPR/Cas12a for sensitive and visualized detection of Salmonella spp. Food Control 2023, 145, 109494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hille, F.; Richter, H.; Wong, S.P.; Bratovic, M.; Ressel, S.; Charpentier, E. The Biology of CRISPR-Cas: Backward and Forward. Cell 2018, 172, 1239–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zetsche, B.; Gootenberg, J.S.; Abudayyeh, O.O.; Slaymaker, I.M.; Makarova, K.S.; Essletzbichler, P.; Volz, S.E.; Joung, J.; van der Oost, J.; Regev, A.; et al. Cpf1 Is a Single RNA-Guided Endonuclease of a Class 2 CRISPR-Cas System. Cell 2015, 163, 759–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chen, J.S.; Ma, E.B.; Harrington, L.B.; Da Costa, M.; Tian, X.R.; Palefsky, J.M.; Doudna, J.A. CRISPR-Cas12a target binding unleashes indiscriminate single-stranded DNase activity. Science 2018, 360, 436–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fernandez, J.P.; Vejnar, C.E.; Giraldez, A.J.; Rouet, R.; Moreno-Mateos, M.A. Optimized CRISPR-Cpf1 system for genome editing in zebrafish. Methods 2018, 150, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Li, S.Y.; Cheng, Q.X.; Liu, J.K.; Nie, X.Q.; Zhao, G.P.; Wang, J. CRISPR-Cas12a has both cis- and trans-cleavage activities on single-stranded DNA. Cell Res. 2018, 28, 491–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, S.Y.; Cheng, Q.X.; Wang, J.M.; Li, X.Y.; Zhang, Z.L.; Gao, S.; Cao, R.B.; Zhao, G.P.; Wang, J. CRISPR-Cas12a-assisted nucleic acid detection. Cell Discov. 2018, 4, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chaijarasphong, T.; Thammachai, T.; Itsathitphaisarn, O.; Sritunyalucksana, K.; Suebsing, R. Potential application of CRISPR-Cas12a fluorescence assay coupled with rapid nucleic acid amplification for detection of white spot syndrome virus in shrimp. Aquaculture 2019, 512, 734340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, H.; Wang, J.; Hu, X.; Tang, X.; Zhang, C. A rapid and high-throughput Helicobacter pylori RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-based nucleic acid detection system. Clin. Chim. Acta 2023, 540, 117201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. GB 29921-2021; National Standard for Food Safety, the Limit of Pathogenic Bacteria in Pre-Packaged Food. Ministry of Health: Beijing, China, 2021.
  32. GB 4789.10-2010; National Food Safety Standard Food Microbiological Examination: Staphylococcus aureus. Ministry of Health: Beijing, China, 2010.
  33. Misawa, N.; Kawashima, K.; Kawamoto, H.; Kondo, F. Development of a combined filtration-enrichment culture followed by a one-step duplex PCR technique for the rapid detection of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli in human faecal samples. J. Med. Microbiol. 2002, 51, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, J.B.; Wang, Y.; Hu, X.W.; Yang, Q.W.; Chen, Y.F.; Jiang, W.; Liu, X.F.; Liu, H.; Zeng, H.J. The development of RPA and CRISPR-Cas12a based immunoassay strip for sensitive detection of genetically modified crops. Food Control 2022, 139, 109048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hu, J.Q.; Wang, Y.; Ding, H.M.; Jiang, C.P.; Geng, Y.; Sun, X.C.; Jing, J.Z.; Gao, H.; Wang, Z.C.; Dong, C.W. Recombinase polymerase amplification with polymer flocculation sedimentation for rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus in food samples. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 331, 108691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Cremonesi, P.; Monistero, V.; Moroni, P.; Barberio, A.; Almeida, R.; Latorre, A.A.; Castiglioni, B. Detection Methods. In Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences, 3rd ed.; McSweeney, P.L.H., McNamara, J.P., Eds.; Academic Press: Oxford, UK, 2022; pp. 457–468. [Google Scholar]
  37. Fu, X.R.; Sun, J.D.; Ye, Y.L.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Sun, X.L. A rapid and ultrasensitive dual detection platform based on Cas12a for simultaneous detection of virulence and resistance genes of drug-resistant Salmonella. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 195, 113682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, X.Y.; Wang, L.; He, F.; Chen, G.H.; Bai, L.L.; He, K.Y.; Zhang, F.; Xu, X.H. Label-Free Colorimetric Method for Detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus by Trimming the G-Quadruplex DNAzyme with CRISPR/Cas12a. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 14300–14306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cao, X.; Chang, Y.; Tao, C.; Chen, S.; Lin, Q.; Ling, C.; Huang, S.; Zhang, H. Cas12a/Guide RNA-Based Platforms for Rapidly and Accurately Identifying Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e04870-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, Y.; Shi, Z.; Hu, A.; Cui, J.; Yang, K.; Liu, Y.; Deng, G.; Zhu, C.; Zhu, L. Rapid One-Tube RPA-CRISPR/Cas12 Detection Platform for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic of CRISPR/Cas12a system combined with isothermal amplification for rapid and visual nucleic acid detection.
Figure 1. Schematic of CRISPR/Cas12a system combined with isothermal amplification for rapid and visual nucleic acid detection.
Foods 12 04432 g001
Figure 2. The screening of primers and the crRNA used for the LAMP and RPA reactions. (A1,B1) Amplified fragments and primers of LAMP and RRA. (A2,B2) Visualization of amplification products of different primers for LAMP and RPA by agarose gel electrophoresis. (A3,B3) Relative fluorescence intensity of LAMP-CRISPR/Cas12a and RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a with different crRNA involvements. ***, p < 0.001;, with three biological replicates. M, DL2000 Marker; N, no template added as negative control. Red box, crRNA sequences.
Figure 2. The screening of primers and the crRNA used for the LAMP and RPA reactions. (A1,B1) Amplified fragments and primers of LAMP and RRA. (A2,B2) Visualization of amplification products of different primers for LAMP and RPA by agarose gel electrophoresis. (A3,B3) Relative fluorescence intensity of LAMP-CRISPR/Cas12a and RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a with different crRNA involvements. ***, p < 0.001;, with three biological replicates. M, DL2000 Marker; N, no template added as negative control. Red box, crRNA sequences.
Foods 12 04432 g002
Figure 3. Optimization of LAMP and RPA reaction. (A1,B1) and (A2,B2) Relative fluorescence intensity of LAMP-CRISPR/Cas12a and RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a, respectively. (A3,B3) and (A4,B4) Visualized detection of LAMP and RPA products by gel electrophoresis, respectively. Different letters indicate that the variables are significantly different (p < 0.05); M, DL2000 Marker.
Figure 3. Optimization of LAMP and RPA reaction. (A1,B1) and (A2,B2) Relative fluorescence intensity of LAMP-CRISPR/Cas12a and RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a, respectively. (A3,B3) and (A4,B4) Visualized detection of LAMP and RPA products by gel electrophoresis, respectively. Different letters indicate that the variables are significantly different (p < 0.05); M, DL2000 Marker.
Foods 12 04432 g003
Figure 4. The detection specificity results of the LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a platform. (A1,B1) LAMP- and RPA-based CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS assay for bacteria. (A2,B2) LAMP- and RPA-based CRISPR/Cas12a-flu assay for bacteria (with three biological replicates). (A3,B3) Visualized detection of LAMP- and RPA-specific products by gel electrophoresis. (***, p < 0.001). Lanes 1–2, positive samples of S. aureus ATCC6538, ATCC43300. Lanes 3–13, negative samples of S. xylosus ATCC29971, S. mimicus ATCC27851, E. coli. O157, H7 ATCC43888, ATCC43895, E. coli. ATCC25922, ATCC8739, ATCC9673, V. parahaemolyticus ATCC33847, ATCC17802, V. vulnificus ATCC27562, V. algolyticus ATCC33787. N, no template added as negative control. No. 1–13 corresponds to the bacteria in Table S1.
Figure 4. The detection specificity results of the LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a platform. (A1,B1) LAMP- and RPA-based CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS assay for bacteria. (A2,B2) LAMP- and RPA-based CRISPR/Cas12a-flu assay for bacteria (with three biological replicates). (A3,B3) Visualized detection of LAMP- and RPA-specific products by gel electrophoresis. (***, p < 0.001). Lanes 1–2, positive samples of S. aureus ATCC6538, ATCC43300. Lanes 3–13, negative samples of S. xylosus ATCC29971, S. mimicus ATCC27851, E. coli. O157, H7 ATCC43888, ATCC43895, E. coli. ATCC25922, ATCC8739, ATCC9673, V. parahaemolyticus ATCC33847, ATCC17802, V. vulnificus ATCC27562, V. algolyticus ATCC33787. N, no template added as negative control. No. 1–13 corresponds to the bacteria in Table S1.
Foods 12 04432 g004
Figure 5. (A,B) Sensitivity assessment of various detection methods for nuc genomic DNA and S. aureus strain pure cultures. (A1,B1) and (A2,B2) Sensitivity of the LAMP-CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS and RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS assay for S. aureus with optimized reaction conditions viewed by the naked eye. (A3,B3) and (A4,B4) Fluorescence results of LAMP-CRISPR/Cas12a-flu and RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-flu detection method. (A5,B5) and (A6,B6) LAMP and RPA products were visualized using an agarose gel electrophoresis platform with a microplate reader (three biological replicates). Different letters indicate that the variables are significantly different (p < 0.05). N, no template added as negative control.
Figure 5. (A,B) Sensitivity assessment of various detection methods for nuc genomic DNA and S. aureus strain pure cultures. (A1,B1) and (A2,B2) Sensitivity of the LAMP-CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS and RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS assay for S. aureus with optimized reaction conditions viewed by the naked eye. (A3,B3) and (A4,B4) Fluorescence results of LAMP-CRISPR/Cas12a-flu and RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-flu detection method. (A5,B5) and (A6,B6) LAMP and RPA products were visualized using an agarose gel electrophoresis platform with a microplate reader (three biological replicates). Different letters indicate that the variables are significantly different (p < 0.05). N, no template added as negative control.
Foods 12 04432 g005
Figure 6. The applicability of the LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a platform to detect S. aureus in spiked samples and natural samples. (A1,B1) The LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS assay on different spiked samples viewed by the naked eye. (A2,B2) The LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-flu assays on different spiked samples. (A3,B3) LAMP and RPA products from different spiked samples were visualized using agarose gel electrophoresis. (C) Comparison of S. aureus test results for matching natural samples analyzed using the LAMP-CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-flu or PCR method (three biological replicates) (***, p < 0.001). 1, milk; 2, reconstituted milk; 3, orange juice; 4, soya milk; N, no template added as negative control.
Figure 6. The applicability of the LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a platform to detect S. aureus in spiked samples and natural samples. (A1,B1) The LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS assay on different spiked samples viewed by the naked eye. (A2,B2) The LAMP, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-flu assays on different spiked samples. (A3,B3) LAMP and RPA products from different spiked samples were visualized using agarose gel electrophoresis. (C) Comparison of S. aureus test results for matching natural samples analyzed using the LAMP-CRISPR/Cas12a-ICS, RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-flu or PCR method (three biological replicates) (***, p < 0.001). 1, milk; 2, reconstituted milk; 3, orange juice; 4, soya milk; N, no template added as negative control.
Foods 12 04432 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, D.; Zeng, H.; Wu, W.; Liu, H.; Wang, J. Isothermal Amplification and CRISPR/Cas12a-System-Based Assay for Rapid, Sensitive and Visual Detection of Staphylococcus aureus. Foods 2023, 12, 4432. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12244432

AMA Style

Xu D, Zeng H, Wu W, Liu H, Wang J. Isothermal Amplification and CRISPR/Cas12a-System-Based Assay for Rapid, Sensitive and Visual Detection of Staphylococcus aureus. Foods. 2023; 12(24):4432. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12244432

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Danhong, Haijuan Zeng, Wenhui Wu, Hua Liu, and Jinbin Wang. 2023. "Isothermal Amplification and CRISPR/Cas12a-System-Based Assay for Rapid, Sensitive and Visual Detection of Staphylococcus aureus" Foods 12, no. 24: 4432. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12244432

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop