Next Article in Journal
A Novel Edible Coating Produced from a Wheat Gluten, Pistacia vera L. Resin, and Essential Oil Blend: Antimicrobial Effects and Sensory Properties on Chicken Breast Fillets
Previous Article in Journal
Foaming and Other Functional Properties of Freeze-Dried Mare’s Milk
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Peel Extracts as Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Additives Used in Alfalfa Sprouts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Potential of Syzygnium polyanthum as Natural Food Preservative: A Review

1
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia
2
School of Biotechnology, International University, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City 721400, Vietnam
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(12), 2275; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12122275
Submission received: 30 April 2023 / Revised: 25 May 2023 / Accepted: 3 June 2023 / Published: 6 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Antioxidants and Antimicrobials in Food Preservation)

Abstract

:
Food preservation is one of the strategies taken to maintain the level of public health. Oxidation activity and microbial contamination are the primary causes of food spoilage. For health reasons, people prefer natural preservatives over synthetic ones. Syzygnium polyanthum is widely spread throughout Asia and is utilized as a spice by the community. S. polyanthum has been found to be rich in phenols, hydroquinones, tannins, and flavonoids, which are potential antioxidants and antimicrobial agents. Consequently, S. polyanthum presents a tremendous opportunity as a natural preservative. This paper reviews recent articles about S. polyanthum dating back to the year 2000. This review summarizes the findings of natural compounds presented in S. polyanthum and their functional properties as antioxidants, antimicrobial agents, and natural preservatives in various types of food.

1. Introduction

Food preservation is necessary to define and enhance food shelf life, customer acceptance, and increase food security [1]. The preservation of food by means of the addition of chemicals is one way. Synthetic chemical preservatives are used widely in the food industry to inhibit the deterioration caused by microbial growth, enzyme activity, and oxidation. Due to the potential health risks posed by synthetic preservatives in food, however, consumers are becoming hesitant to use such products [2]. Oxidation and pathogen microbial growth are the primary causes of food deterioration [3,4]. Therefore, food preservation is performed to prevent food spoilage.
In Indonesia, various medicinal plants have been used as traditional treatments for a variety of degenerative disorders for generations. Syzygnium polyanthums are easily accessible evergreen trees. S. polyanthum, also known as “Salam”, has comestible fruits and flowers, and its dried leaves are used in numerous Indonesian dishes as a food additive [5] or as essential seasoning in Indonesian cuisine [6]. It is prevalent in Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam [7]. The polyphenols, flavonoids, and tannins found in S. polyanthum serve as antioxidants and antimicrobial agents [8,9,10]. For preventing food deterioration, S. polyanthum is an alternative natural preservative to synthetic preservatives, which are unfavorably considered by consumers [11,12,13]. This article summarizes the chemical composition and impact of S. polyanthum on the oxidation and microbial activity of various foods and preservation techniques.

2. Food Spoilage

Lipid oxidation and microbial activity are major factors in food degradation [14]. Periodically, the quality of the food continues to deteriorate. Mainly, food quality degradation is caused by chemical, biochemical, or physical changes [15]. Various definitions of food spoilage exist. In general, food spoilage indicates conditions that are inappropriate for consumption. Regarding food safety, where food spoilage may result in infection or even mortality, the issue of food spoilage becomes crucial [16]. Food spoilage can occur along the processes animal farming, transportation, butchering, processing, wrapping, delivery, and home meal preparation [17,18].
Rigor mortis, which lasts approximately 12 h at room temperature in tropical climates, can immediately cause the spoilage of fresh meat. Rigor mortis is the process of losing flexibility as a result of tightening after death. Typically, digestive enzymes and lipases, microbiological contamination, and oxidation degrade meats. During the process of meat contamination, various components decompose, and new compounds are formed. This new compound changes the aroma, flavor, and texture of the meat [19,20,21]. The food industry continues to pursue alternative technologies for quality assurance, livestock safety, and long-term preservation in order to meet the demands of modern consumers for wholesome meat-based products [22]. Oxidation and microbial contamination not only cause food spoiling in fresh meat products but also in oil, paste, fruit, fruit products, vegetables, veggies products, and bakery products [23,24].
Lipid oxidation of foods results in the formation of harmful compounds, has a negative impact on the sensory qualities of foods, and is a major contributor to reducing shelf life and making food waste [25]. As a result of metabolic activity, the growth of microorganisms in food creates variations in the physical appearance of food. Some of these changes result in food spoilage and food poisoning. The most critical elements that affect microbial development in foods are the intrinsic and extrinsic environment of food storage [26,27]. Food spoilage due to oxidation and microbial activity is explained further in the next section.

2.1. Oxidation Activity

Food materials derived from plants and animals generally consist of water, fat, protein, and carbohydrates as the main building components [28]. The most prevalent lipid molecules in nature are fats and oils. At normal temperature, fat is solid while oil is liquid, suggesting a distinction in their consistency and physical qualities. Differences in the number of carbon chain lengths, double bonds, and cis or trans forms of unsaturated fatty acids determine the melting point of fats (polyunsaturated fatty acids, PUFA) [29]. Prior research indicates that the consumption of PUFAs has significant health benefits. These include the α-linolenic acid (ALA 18:3 ω-3), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20:5 ω-3), docosapentaenoic acid (22:5 ω-3), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6 ω-3), γ-linolenic acid (GLA, 18:3 ω-6), and arachidonic acid (ARA, 20:6 ω-6) [30]. Long-chain ω-3 PUFA provide significant health benefits, particularly for the prevention of cardiovascular and certain inflammatory diseases [31]. Food products with high levels of DHA and EPA are essential for pregnant women [32]. In foods, a lipid can serve as an enzyme, flavoring, and coloring agent [33].
Oxidation is the main cause of food degradation. Lipids contain two main groups, namely polar lipids (phospholipids) and neutral lipids (triglycerides), and they are easily oxidized by reacting with reactive oxygen precursors and free radicals. This oxidation can cause rancidity, discoloration, decreased nutritional quality, and some toxic compounds [34]. PUFAs are the main target of attack by reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to a nonenzymatic oxidation process, called lipid peroxidation [35]. Lipid oxidation associated with a decrease in the quality of fatty foods occurs based on the mechanisms of auto-oxidation, photo-oxidation, and enzymatic oxidation. Photo-oxidation produces aliphatic and aromatic oxidation compounds, due to the presence of a light photosensitizer, which converts triplet oxygen into singlet oxygen, which is an extremely reactive and nonradical molecule. The PUFA oxidation assisted by lipoxygenase enzymes through free radical mechanisms forms specific hydroperoxides [34,36]. Hydroperoxides formed through enzymatic oxidation processes are intermediates in synthesis of prostaglandins and eicosanoids [37]. Among these mechanisms, auto-oxidation, which is a persistent chain reaction involving free radicals, is the most typical and challenging reaction to avoid [38].
Auto-oxidation occurs through three stages: initiation, propagation, and termination [39,40]. During the initiation stage, a hydrogen atom is abstracted from its adjacent carbon into a double bond in the unsaturated fatty acid (RH), forming an alkyl radical (R•). The alkyl radical product often undergoes double-bound rearrangement to stabilize itself into a conjugated diene or triene [41,42]. During the propagation step, peroxyl radicals, which are ordinarily generated as primary products, abstract hydrogen from a nearby lipid (atom transfer process). The new alkyl radical combines with molecular oxygen once more to produce new peroxyl radicals, and the cycle is continued. Before two R• unite to complete the process, these propagation processes may repeat up to 100 times [39,43,44]. The termination stage involves a reaction between two radical molecules to produce a nonradical molecule [36]. The lipid auto-oxidation stages are illustrated in Figure 1.
The mechanism for the generation of secondary oxidation products such as these volatile chemicals is extremely complicated and varied depending on the PUFA substrate [46]. Auto-oxidation involves the reaction of triplet oxygen with organic compounds under moderate conditions. Fat auto-oxidation is a series of reactions involving free radicals that occur in three stages, namely initiation, propagation, and termination [47]. A number of secondary oxidation products including volatiles can be formed from the early stages of EPA and DHA oxidation; meanwhile, only a small number of products were detected in the first stage of linolenic acid (LA) oxidation. This observation occurs because EPA- and DHA-LOOH are less stable than LA-LOOH. Even at very low oxidation levels, fish oil that is rich in EPA and DHA frequently has a fishy and metallic flavor [48]. Fat oxidation can be monitored through the formation of primary and secondary reaction products. The primary products of fat oxidation can be observed to form hydroperoxides and conjugated dienes. Secondary products that can be measured are anisidine values, TOTOX values, and volatile compounds [49].

2.2. Microbial Activity

Food spoilage is a change in food quality that renders it unpleasant and unsafe for human or animal intake. The presence of odors and changes in texture are indicators of food spoilage. Microorganisms are the primary cause of food spoilage [50]. Microbial pathogens in food can cause spoilage and contribute to the incidence of foodborne disease, and the emergence of multidrug-resistant and disinfectant-resistant bacteria (such as Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) has increased rapidly, resulting in an increase in morbidity and mortality [51].
Through the production of toxic gases and volatile organic compounds, bacterial metabolism, and the accumulation of extracellular chemicals, bacteria contaminate food [52]. In the meat and poultry industries, bacterial spoilage causes color changes, a miserable odor, and slimy foods [53]. Psychotropic Pseudomona is one of the primary organisms responsible for the spoilage of fresh protein foods such as meat and fish that have been stored aerobically. This is due in part to its capacity to produce extracellular proteolytic and lipolytic enzymes and to produce slime on food surfaces [54]. Leoconostoc, Pediococcus damnosus, Pseudomonas, S. putrefaciens, S. phosporeum Aeromonas spp., Enterobacteriaceae, B. cereus, Salmonella species, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Campylobacter species, Bacillus cereus, and Escherichia coli are the most common bacterial causes of foodborne diseases [55,56]. However, by sacrificing the metabolic efficiency of aerobic or anaerobic electron transfer chains, lactic acid bacteria can adhere to a “iron-free diet” and occupy ecological niches associated with plants and animals in which iron deficiency inhibits growth. Lactic acid bacteria dominate the fermentation microbiota of the majority of fermented foods, but they also play an important role as spoilage organisms [57].
The microbial degradation of aquatic food products by spoilage microorganism is linked to the release of chemicals/gases that impart an off-flavor and odor, indicating spoilage. As biochemical indicators of fish quality, these volatile amines, primarily di-methylamine, trimethylamine, hydrogen sulfide, and ammonia, have an unpleasant taste. Fish typically contains a high concentration of free amino acids. Microorganism convert amino acids and urea into ammonia, biogenic amines, organic acids, and sulfur compounds, while trimethylamine oxide is decomposed into trimethylamine and dimethylamine, which significantly degrades the quality of fish [24].
Fungi are a group of microorganisms that cause severe spoilage and are resistant to most food industry preservation procedures. Filamentous molds and yeast are very easy to contaminate and disperse in food at the processing stage. As a result of their varied structure, in general, fungi are able to survive in certain ecological systems so that they easily contaminate commercially processed foods. Several indicators of food spoilage are used to determine the shelf-stability of foods [58,59]. Since a single microbial criterion may not accurately predict the shelf life and spoilage condition of meats, consider the following parameters for identifying microbiological spoilage indicators: (1) indicators must be present in low numbers in the fresh product, (2) the amount of these microorganisms must increase dramatically from farm to fork, (3) such organisms must be the predominant cause of deterioration at the outset of spoilage, and (4) the spoilage features owing to these pathogens must be simply and immediately detected [60]. Food spoilage caused by fungi infection can be seen by the formation of black, white, or pink mold [61,62,63], congested filamentous appearance [64], gas production that can occasionally cause an explosion, and defection of food surface [58].
Food poisoning is an effect of bacteria-contaminated food consumption [65]. In general, bacterial food poisoning causes gastrointestinal disease [66]. In the EU, nearly half of all cases of diarrhea due to contamination by Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli require hospitalization [67]. Food poisoning in Salmonella causes salmonellosis [68]. S. aureus staphylococcal enterotoxins frequently cause staphylococcal food poisoning during food contamination. The severity of the illness is dependent on the quantity of toxins consumed and the consumer’s overall health. Some report nausea and vomiting, while others report diarrhea, prostration, and fever [69].

3. Food Preservation

Food preservation is described as the methods used to minimize internal and external variables that could cause food to decay. The basic purpose of food preservation is to extend the shelf life of food while preserving its original nutritional texture, color, and value. Food preservation techniques can be classified into three groups, namely physical processing, biological processing, and chemical processing [70]. Physical preservation processes can be thermal or nonthermal techniques. Thermal preservation techniques such as pasteurization, high-temperature sterilization, drying, and evaporation are widely used in conventional food preservation. These techniques can inhibit the microbial activity that leads to food spoilage, but they can also modify the physical, sensory, and nutritional properties of foods, such as heat-sensitive vitamins and polyphenols [71,72]. The food is subjected to nonthermal treatment for a very brief amount of time and is treated at room temperature. Since the exposure period is brief and the temperature is low, there is no risk of heat-sensitive nutritional components in the food being lost, no risk of texture damage, and no risk of the development of any toxin in the food. Several methods that can be used as nonthermal preservation techniques, such as ultrasonication, cold plasma technology, supercritical technology, irradiation, pulsed electric field, high hydrostatic pressure, pulsed ultraviolet technology, and ozonation [73,74]. Impressively, nonthermal technologies are confirmed to not only preserve bioactive compounds better than thermal treatments, but in some cases, they can also induce their release from the living cells contained in the product, resulting in an increase in their interactively detectable concentration and, frequently, their bioaccessibility [75].
Another method of preservation is biological processing. The biopreservation process is a method of food preservation that utilizes the antibacterial power of naturally existing organisms and their metabolites [76]. One of the methods of biopreservation is fermentation. Fermentation reduces food spoilage and rids food of pathogenic germs and metabolites through the production of numerous beneficial byproducts with bacteria [77]. Fermentation will generate high-quality products with certain improved nutritional values and an abundance of bioactive compounds. Additionally, fermentation results in the inclusion of several probiotics. Therefore, fermentation will generate raw materials into new products with improved nutritional value, intestinal health, and certain biological functions [78].
Using chemical reagents to preserve food is one of the oldest and most conventional practices. The effectiveness of this method depends on the amount and specificity of the chemical reagents, as well as the physical and chemical properties of the food. Chemical preservation methods involve the inclusion of chemical preservatives and pH regulation [70,79]. In the food and pharmaceutical industries, synthetic preservatives such as sodium acetate, sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate, and butyl paraben are commonly employed [80]. Parabens are alkyl esters of p-hydroxybenzoic acid that possess antibacterial, antifungal, and preservation characteristics [81]. Sodium benzoate is commonly used to preserve margarines, sauces, marmalades, gelatin, liqueurs, beers, and fruit juices. Utilization of sodium benzoate in excess of the threshold can result in genotoxic, clastogenic, and neurotoxic effects [82]. Synthetic preservatives have numerous detrimental consequences on human health. In recent years, people have demanded the complete replacement of chemically manufactured preservatives due to their detrimental effects on health. This has led to a growing interest in the development of more natural alternatives to extend the shelf life and safety of food [83,84]. As traditional preservatives, natural chemicals such as salt, sugar, vinegar, alcohol, and diatomaceous earth are also employed. Certain plants have their own preservatives, such as citric and ascorbic acids from lemon or other citrus juice, which prevent the activity of the phenolase enzyme responsible for the browning of cut apple and potato surfaces [85]. According to numerous research studies, plant oils and plant extracts have been utilized as food preservatives and medical therapeutic agents for decades [83]. Mulberry and onions are used to preserve fish to maintain its sensory attributes [86]. Oil of bay, clove, cinnamon and thyme are used widely as food preservatives [87,88]. Cinnamon is a heat-stable food preservative that can be used in cookies [89]. Some plants such as mint leaves, oregano, grape seed, clove, mustard, and black currant can be used as meat preservatives [90].

4. Syzygnium Polyanthum

S. polyanthum leaves are widely used as traditional medicine and food seasoning, especially in Indonesia and Malaysia [91,92]. S. polyanthum is classified as Plantae kingdom, Magnollophyta division, Magnoliopsida class, Myrtalles ordo, Myrtaceae family, and Syzygium genus [93]. S. polyanthum has a taproot and a round, silky trunk. It has an oval shape, a sharp base and a pointed tip, flat edges, and a dark green upper surface and a lighter green lower surface. Its leaves emit a pleasant aroma when crushed [94]. S. polyanthum is widely used as a traditional remedy for a range of infections, such as diabetes [95], cardiovascular disease [96], hyperlipidemia [97], anemia [98], kidney disease [99], liver disease [100], gout [101], oxidative disease [102], and some bacterial diseases [103].
Numerous secondary metabolites are abundant in S. polyanthum leaves. Major secondary metabolites are 28% tannin group and its derivates, followed by 25% phenolic groups [10]. S. polyanthum leaves have various bioactivities, including antioxidant, antibacterial, anticancer, and antidiabetic substances [104].
Compounds found in S. polyanthum ethanol extract are phytol, (Z)-1,3-phytadiene, cyclopentane, phytol acetate, 2-hecadecene,3,7,15-tetramethyl, and cis-1,3-dimethyl-4-aza phenanthrene [105]. Meanwhile, compounds found in fraction acetone:water (4:1) are malic acid, gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, epigallocatechin gallate, myricetin-3-O-rhamnoside, luteic acid, and desmanthin-1 [106]. The structure of S. polyanthum extract compounds is shown in Figure 2.
The primary secondary metabolites in S. polyanthum water extract are phenol hydroquinone, tannins, and flavonoid. Flavonoid extracts of S. polyanthum exhibited the highest antioxidant activity of the three selective metabolites [107]. Flavonoid compounds detected on S. polyanthum are 5,3′,4′-trihydroxyflavone-3-C-glycoside; 5,4′,5′-trihydroxyflavone-3-C-glycoside; 5,6,3′,4′-tetrahydroxyflavone; 5,6,4′,5′-tetrahydroxyflavone and 5,3′,4′-trihydroxyflavone or 5,4′,5′-trihydroxyflavone [108]. The structure of S. polyanthum flavonoid compounds is shown in Figure 3.
S. polyanthum can be utilized not only as an extract but also as an essential oil. Polar and nonpolar compounds are essential oil building mixtures consisting of 20–60 compounds in various concentration. Nevertheless, there are just two or three major compounds and trace amounts for the others. The compounds of S. polyanthum are cis-4-decenal, 1-decyl aldehyde, capryl aldehyde, α-curcumene, 1,2,3,3a,4,6a-hexahydropentalene, octanal, decanal, farnesol, β-ocimene, α-pinene, vitispirane, α-copaene, dodecanal, trans-caryophyllene, α-humulene, α-gurjunene, 4,11-selinadiene, valencene, γ-cadinene, α-panasinsene, nerolidol, n-humulene oxide, elemol, juniper camphor, and hexa-hydrofarnesyl acetone [109,110,111,112]. The structure of S. polyanthum essential compounds is shown in Figure 4.

5. Bioactivities of S. polyanthum Leaves

5.1. Antioxidant Activity of S. polyanthum Leaves

Some research laboratories have developed synthetic antioxidants that replace phenols and aromatic amines, such as butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), and propyl gallate (PG) [113]. The community prefers natural ingredients and is extremely concerned about the negative perceptions of the safety of synthetic food ingredients. Consequently, numerous sectors are interested in effective natural antioxidants [114,115].
Antioxidants typically prevent the initiation of lipid auto-oxidation. During food processing and storage, antioxidants such as tocopherol and astaxanthin can minimize the adverse effects of oxidative stress, because they act as scavengers of ROS and reactive oxygen metabolites (ROMs) species [116]. Antioxidants are categorized as either primary or secondary. Primary antioxidants are antioxidants that can inhibit or delay oxidation in two ways: by scavenging free radicals or by inhibiting lipid peroxidation [117]. Secondary antioxidants slake singlet oxygen, dissolved peroxides, chelate prooxidative metal ions, and suppress oxidative enzymes [118].
Antioxidants react with free radicals via hydrogen atom transfer (HAT), single electron transfer (SET), or a combination of both of them [119]. The HAT mechanism entails the simultaneous motion of a proton and an electron in a single kinetic reaction step. Free radicals liberate a hydrogen atom from antioxidants, which then become free radicals. The SET mechanism consists of the transfer of electrons from antioxidants to radical cations. The HAT and SET typically occur together. The mechanism that takes place is contingent on the structure and solubility of the antioxidant, the partition coefficient, and the polarity of the solvent [120].
Sygzinium polyanthum with its synonym Eugenia Polyantha contain active compounds as antioxidants [121]. Compounds in S. polyanthum acting as antioxidants are pyrogallol, gallic acid, myrecitin, farnesol, phytol, and tocopherol [122,123]. The antioxidant compounds in S. polyanthum are shown in Figure 5.
Determined by the number and location of hydroxyl groups and benzene rings present in their molecules, phenolic compounds’ radical scavenging capacity is proportional to their antioxidant activity. Consequently, polymeric structures with a high number of hydroxyl groups and benzene rings possess a greater antioxidant potential [124,125], as shown in Figure 6, which is the typical configuration for evaluating antioxidant activity. Multiple studies have revealed a correlation between total phenolic content and antioxidant activity. Increasing overall phenolic content promotes antioxidant activity [126]. Table 1 shows S. polyanthum as an antioxidant in various evaluation methods.

5.2. Antibacterial Activity of S. polyanthum Leaves

Essential oils, organic acids, bacteriocins, natural polymers, and biosurfactants are antimicrobial agents that can be employed, and some of them have been studied recently. Utilizing natural antimicrobial chemicals without compromising food quality (such as color, texture, and sensory acceptability) has become a new trend in food production and a viable method of quality control [133]. S. polyanthum leaf extract inhibits the growth and colonization of various harmful bacteria [134]. Terpenoids were the chemical compounds in the leaves that acted as an antimicrobial. The terpenoids contained within are α-himachalene, eremophilene, δ-cadinene, γ-selinene, and 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol [135]. The structure of the terpenoids in S. polyanthum is shown in Figure 7.
Since protein is important for bacterial living systems and physiological functions, its loss could suggest an abnormal cell membrane shape and result in malfunction or cell death. The enhanced extracellular protein content of B. cereus and E. coli treated with curcumin demonstrates the breakdown of cellular membrane integrity. The intracellular ATP concentration and relative fluorescence decreased in response to varied curcumin concentrations, which may have been due to intracellular ATP leakage and depletion of the intracellular ATP pool. In general, intracellular ATP content was regarded as a major element capable of supplying energy for regular physiological processes of the cell [136,137]. These findings revealed a link between the depletion of ATP and the deterioration of cell membrane integrity [138].
Its phytochemical abundance, including flavonoids, tannins, alkaloids, phenols, saponins, steroids, and triterpenoids, contributed to S. polyanthum antibacterial activity. As secondary metabolites, flavonoids can suppress bacterial growth. By causing damage to cell membranes and preventing the creation of bacterial cell macromolecules, flavonoids impede the growth of bacteria [139]. Their antibacterial role can be affected by the group of chemicals contained within. The polyphenol group damages the cytoplasmic membranes of bacteria, triterpenoids break down cell membranes, flavonoids obstruct bacterial cell membrane integrity, and alkaloids impact interbacterial osmotic pressure [140]. Diffusion of the cell membrane causes the bacterial membrane destruction in a manner directly equivalent to the added antibacterial concentration [141]. The membrane becomes permeable to cytoplasmic components, resulting in cell death. It was also hypothesized that large quantities of S. polyanthum leaf extract contribute to the rapid destruction of microorganisms by causing membrane deterioration and cell wall degeneration. To kill microorganisms, leaf extract must bind, occupy, and remain at the target region for a significant amount of time to impede the metabolic process and chemical reactions of the bacteria. Increasing plant extract can also saturate the target location and produce a quick bactericidal effect [142,143]. The hydrophobicity of plant extracts and their bioactive components contribute to the breakdown of membrane cell lipids, making them more permeable to penetration. In addition, the bioactive components in the extract may impede the enzymatic process necessary for the creation of important metabolites. Bioactive chemicals that interfere with and modify the structure of the ribosome can also inhibit protein synthesis in microorganisms. This interference could cause a misinterpretation of the genetic information encoded on the messenger RNA of bacteria [144].
Mainly, bacteria cell walls are structured by peptidoglycan layers. Antibacterial substances will inhibit the enzyme in the peptidoglycan bacterial cell wall [136]. Gram-positive bacteria are more inhibited by plant essential oil than Gram-negative ones. The plasma membrane is the most frequently reported as antimicrobial target; nevertheless, current research indicates intracellular sites for at least some peptides. Gram-negative bacteria have a lipophilic outer membrane that is phospholipids rich, making it difficult for certain phenolic compounds to permeate the cell wall. Additionally, the presence of periplasmic enzymes in bacteria damages molecules from the outside that enter the bacterial cell. Despite the fact that the majority of antimicrobials peptide work by nonspecific methods, they frequently exhibit selectivity between various microorganisms, such as Gram-negative versus Gram-positive bacteria and susceptibility of fungal cells versus other eukaryotic cells [145,146]. Antimicrobial activity can be determined by measuring the minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) and the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) or minimum fungal concentration (MFC). MIC is the minimal antimicrobial agent concentration that inhibits microbial growth, whereas MBC or MFC is the minimal antimicrobial agent concentration necessary to kill microorganisms [147].
S. polyanthum leaves have antibacterial activity to B. cereus [148], S. aureus, S. mutans [149], Salmonella typhimurium, Escherichia coli, and Lactobacillus acidophilus [134]. In addition to its potential as an antibacterial agent, S. polyanthum also possesses antifungal properties. Antifungal properties of plants are typically derived from their secondary metabolites. Common active antifungal components in plants include phenolic compounds, hexanal, hexanol, glucosinolate, and essential oils [50]. Antifungal mechanisms occur in fungal cells as a result of ergosterol inhibition induced by 5,6 desaturase (ERG3) inhibition [150,151]. Ergosterol is the most prevalent sterol in the fungal plasma membrane, and its binding to an ergosterol-specific enzyme can result in lanosterol demethylation [152]. The antimicrobial capacity of S. polyanthum is shown in Table 2.

6. Natural Food Preservation

Globally, food quality and safety has become a major public concern, and dependable sensing or monitoring systems are required to confirm the values of various food stuffs, especially perishable foods such as pork, seafood, lamb, beef, and poultry [150]. Numerous foods are naturally perishable and must be protected from spoilage during preparation, storage, and distribution in order to achieve their intended shelf life. Because food products are now frequently sold in distant regions worldwide, the need for these products to have long shelf-lives has also increased. The need to extend the shelf-life of food triggered the development of food preservation techniques [162]. Some of the most prevalent preservation techniques include food additive utilization [163], chilling technology [164], and advance packaging technology [24,165,166].
In addition to healthful food, people are increasingly demanding safer alternatives to the use of synthetic additives in the food industry. As a result, numerous plant-based preservatives have been evaluated by the food industry [167]. Some plants contain phytochemicals with antimicrobial and antioxidant properties; consequently, they can preserve and prolong the shelf life of food. In addition to preserving food by inhibiting bacterial activity, herb extracts rich in phenolic compounds can also preserve food by inhibiting lipid oxidation due to their high potential antioxidant activity [168]. As a result, plant-based preservatives have been researched and incorporated into food as a replacement for synthetic preservatives [169]. As seasonings, flavor enhancers, perfumes, and food preservatives, spices are a class of plants. Some companies add synthetic antimicrobial compounds such as benzoate, nitrate, and nitrite to food to prevent food spoilage caused by the growth of microbes [170].
By removing all pro-oxidants and air, together with inactivating all enzymes involved in food degradation, it is possible to prevent or reduce food spoilage [171]. Several food groups that have the potential to be preserved based on the synergistic activity of herbs as antioxidants and antibacterials include fish and meat products, bakery products, dairy products, vegetable and fruit juices, sauces, cereals, vegetables and fruits, and oils [172].

6.1. Food Antioxidant Preservative

Antioxidants are added to food to prevent the oxidation that causes rancidity and browning. Antioxidants are commonly utilized as preservatives in the food industry. By including antioxidants into diets rich in unsaturated fats, rancidity can be avoided [173]. In foods, antioxidants are used to reduce lipid oxidation and development by quenching free radicals. These highly effective antioxidants contain one or more hydroxyl groups or phenol [174]. In the food matrix, PUFAs are often present as a lipid phase dispersed in an aqueous solution covered with a surfactant or emulsifier, which generates a thin interfacial layer that separates oil and water, or what is widely known as an oil-in-water emulsion. This renders the food emulsion unstable because it is easily exposed to air, oxygen, or light, which causes the food to oxidize quickly [175]. Applying antioxidants such as phenols to prevent oxidation is a highly efficient and cost-effective strategy. By rebuilding the parent fatty acids and producing less reactive radicals, ArO•, phenol compounds effectively neutralize peroxide radicals, LOO• [176,177]. Antioxidants are necessary for avoiding the oxidative damage of EPA and DHA [178]. When quercetin, ascorbic acid, and curcumin were added to the oil-in-water emulsion system, the peroxide value of the oil decreased significantly. This demonstrates the presence of the “polar paradox” notion, according to which polar antioxidants tend to dissolve in nonpolar samples. The combination of these antioxidants demonstrates a synergistic effect on the suppression of fat oxidation [179].
To appropriately evaluate the potential of S. polyanthum as an antioxidant preservative, models with the chemical, physical, and environmental characteristics predicted in food products must be built, particularly models with a high lipid content. There are three techniques to evaluate antioxidant model systems: bulk oil, oil-in-water emulsions, and muscle foods [180]. Volatile organic acids are byproducts of secondary lipid oxidation, and some of them have extremely low threshold values for offensive odors [181]. Moreover, the lipid oxidation products result in the loss of food nutritional value, texture, color, and certain functional properties [182]. Due to their high fat content, which makes them especially susceptible to lipid oxidation, it is crucial to include antioxidants in these food matrices. However, consumers are unwilling to accept reductions in the product sensory quality (color, odor, or flavor), which is frequently affected by the addition of natural antioxidants [12]. S. polyanthum as an antioxidant food additive is described in Table 3.

6.2. Food Antimicrobial Preservative

Natural antimicrobial food preservatives can be obtained from animal (lactoferrin, chitosan, lysozyme, and milk-derived peptide), plant (saponins, flavonoids, carvacrol, thymol, citral, eugenol, linalool, and terpenes), and microbial agents (reuterin, nisin, and pediocin) [193]. The effectiveness of antimicrobial compounds is reliant upon the pH of the food and the type and number of contaminating microorganisms, as well as the type and concentration of antimicrobials compounds. Because the absorption of compounds is related to temperature, storage temperature can also influence antimicrobial efficacy [194]. S. polyanthum as an antimicrobial food additive is described in Table 4.

7. Conclusions

S. polyanthum contains secondary metabolites such as phenolic compounds, flavonoid, tannins, alkaloids, phenols, saponins, steroids, and triterpenoids. Based on its capacity as an antioxidant and the antimicrobial value of S. polyanthum, it has moderate antioxidant and antimicrobial potential. The addition of S. polyanthum to food is able to extend the food’s shelf-life, though it is not significant. Based on its application in food models, S. polyanthum is able to play a role as a moderate natural preservative.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.J. and A.Z.; methodology, N.J., S.I., D.K. and A.Z.; validation, A.Z. and D.K.; formal analysis, A.Z.; resources, N.J., S.I., A.Z. and D.K; data curation, N.J. and A.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, N.J.; writing—review and editing, N.J., S.I., A.Z., P.V.H. and D.K.; visualization, N.J.; supervision, S.I., A.Z., P.V.H. and D.K.; project administration, A.Z.; funding acquisition, D.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Review Article Writing Grant 2023 Achmad Zainuddin, Indonesia (No. 1549/UN6.3.1/PT.00/2023; 27 Maret 2023).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The study did not report any data.

Acknowledgments

The authors give appreciation and thanks to Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia, with the contract letter of Academic Leadership Grant (ALG) Dikdik Kurnia, no 1549/UN6.3.1/PT.00/2023; 27 Maret 2023.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cichello, S.A. Oxygen absorbers in food preservation: A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 1889–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Beya, M.M.; Netzel, M.E.; Sultanbawa, Y.; Smyth, H.; Hoffman, L.C. Plant-Based Phenolic Molecules as Natural Preservatives in Comminuted Meats: A Review. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sun, X.; Wang, J.; Dong, M.; Zhang, H.; Li, L.; Wang, L. Food spoilage, bioactive food fresh-keeping films and functional edible coatings: Research status, existing problems and development trend. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 119, 122–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tometri, S.S.; Ahmady, M.; Ariaii, P.; Soltani, M.S. Extraction and encapsulation of Laurus nobilis leaf extract with nano-liposome and its effect on oxidative, microbial, bacterial and sensory properties of minced beef. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2020, 14, 3333–3344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ismail, A.; Mohamed, M.; Sulaiman, S.A.; Wan Ahmad, W.A.N. Autonomic Nervous System Mediates the Hypotensive Effects of Aqueous and Residual Methanolic Extracts of Syzygium Polyanthum (Wight) Walp. Var. Polyanthum Leaves in Anaesthetized Rats. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2013, 2013, 716532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Sabandar, C.W.; Jalil, J.; Ahmat, N.; Aladdin, N.-A.; Nik Abdullah Zawawi, N.K.; Sahidin, I. Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Activity of Syzygium Polyanthum (Wight) Walp. Sains Malays. 2022, 51, 1475–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jumaat, S.R.; Tajuddin, S.N.; Sudmoon, R.; Chaveerach, A.; Abdullah, U.H.; Mohamed, R. Chemical Constituents and Toxicity Screening of Three Aromatic Plant Species from Peninsular Malaysia. BioResources 2017, 12, 5878–5895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Berawi, K.N.; Shidarti, L.; Nurdin, S.U.; Lipoeto, N.I.; Wahid, I.; Jamsari; Nurcahyani, E. Comparison Effectiveness of Antidiabetic Activity Extract Herbal Mixture of Soursop Leaves (Annona Muricata), Bay Leaves (Syzygium Polyanthum) and Pegagan Leaves (Centella Asiatica). Biomed. Pharmacol. J. 2017, 10, 1481–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, J.; Liao, C.; Ouyang, X.; Kahramanoğlu, I.; Gan, Y.; Li, M. Antimicrobial Activity of Pomegranate Peel and Its Applications on Food Preservation. J. Food Qual. 2020, 2020, 8850339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Durgawale, P.; Patil, M.; Joshi, S.; Korabu, K.; Datkhile, K. Studies on phytoconstituents, in vitro antioxidant, antibacterial, antiparasitic, antimicrobial, and anticancer potential of medicinal plant Lasiosiphon eriocephalus decne (Family: Thymelaeaceae). J. Nat. Sci. Biol. Med. 2019, 10, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Scicutella, F.; Mannelli, F.; Daghio, M.; Viti, C.; Buccioni, A. Polyphenols and Organic Acids as Alternatives to Antimicrobials in Poultry Rearing: A Review. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gutiérrez-Del-Río, I.; López-Ibáñez, S.; Magadán-Corpas, P.; Fernández-Calleja, L.; Pérez-Valero, Á.; Tuñón-Granda, M.; Miguélez, E.M.; Villar, C.J.; Lombó, F. Terpenoids and Polyphenols as Natural Antioxidant Agents in Food Preservation. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ng, Z.X.; Samsuri, S.N.; Yong, P.H. The antioxidant index and chemometric analysis of tannin, flavonoid, and total phenolic extracted from medicinal plant foods with the solvents of different polarities. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2020, 44, e14680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kong, F.; Singh, R.P. Chemical Deterioration and Physical Instability of Foods and Beverages. In The Stability and Shelf Life of Food; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 43–76. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mattos, G.N.; Tonon, R.V.; Furtado, A.A.; Cabral, L.M. Grape By-Product Extracts against Microbial Proliferation and Lipid Oxidation: A Review: Grape by-Products with Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Potential. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 1055–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Steele, R. Understanding and Measuring the Shelf-Life of Food; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sovacool, B.K.; Bazilian, M.; Griffiths, S.; Kim, J.; Foley, A.; Rooney, D. Decarbonizing the food and beverages industry: A critical and systematic review of developments, sociotechnical systems and policy options. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 143, 110856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Karwowska, M.; Laba, S.; Szczepański, K. Food Loss and Waste in Meat Sector—Why the Consumption Stage Generates the Most Losses? Sustainability 2021, 13, 6227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ghaly, A.E.; Dave, D.; Budge, S.; Brooks, M.S. Fish Spoilage Mechanisms and Preservation Techniques: Review. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 2010, 7, 859–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Addis, M. Major Causes of Meat Spoilage and Preservation Techniques: A. Changes 2015, 41, 101–114. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ding, Z.; Wei, Q.; Liu, C.; Zhang, H.; Huang, F. The Quality Changes and Proteomic Analysis of Cattle Muscle Postmortem during Rigor Mortis. Foods 2022, 11, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shahidi, F.; Abad, A. Lipid-Derived Flavours and Off-Flavours in Food. In Encyclopedia of Food Chemistry; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 182–192. ISBN 978-0-12-814045-1. [Google Scholar]
  23. Nardella, S.; Conte, A.; Del Nobile, M.A. State-of-Art on the Recycling of By-Products from Fruits and Vegetables of Mediterranean Countries to Prolong Food Shelf Life. Foods 2022, 11, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Alfei, S.; Marengo, B.; Zuccari, G. Nanotechnology application in food packaging: A plethora of opportunities versus pending risks assessment and public concerns. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jacobsen, C.; Paiva-Martins, F.; Schwarz, K.; Bochkov, V. Lipid Oxidation and Antioxidants in Food and Nutrition. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2019, 121, 1900298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Abdullahi, A.A.; Bala, J.D.; Kuta, F.A.; Adabara, N.U.; Liyasu, U.S.; Aliu, M.O. Microbial spoilage of food in industry: A review. FUW Trends in Science & Technology 2019, 4, 519–523. [Google Scholar]
  27. Pinu, F.R. Early detection of food pathogens and food spoilage microorganisms: Application of metabolomics. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 54, 213–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wijaya, C.H.; Wijaya, W.; Mehta, B.M. General Properties of Major Food Components. In Handbook of Food Chemistry; Cheung, P.C.K., Mehta, B.M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015; pp. 1–32. ISBN 978-3-642-41609-5. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sartika, R.A.D. Pengaruh Asam Lemak Jenuh, Tidak Jenuh dan Asam Lemak Trans terhadap Kesehatan. Kesmas Natl. Public Health J. 2008, 2, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Cuellar-Bermudez, S.P.; Aguilar-Hernandez, I.; Cardenas-Chavez, D.L.; Ornelas-Soto, N.; Romero-Ogawa, M.A.; Parra-Saldivar, R. Extraction and Purification of High-Value Metabolites from Microalgae: Essential Lipids, Astaxanthin and Phycobiliproteins. Microb. Biotechnol. 2015, 8, 190–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pulz, O.; Gross, W. Valuable products from biotechnology of microalgae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 65, 635–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, Z.; Fulgoni, V.L.; Kris-Etherton, P.M.; Mitmesser, S.H. Dietary Intakes of EPA and DHA Omega-3 Fatty Acids among US Childbearing-Age and Pregnant Women: An Analysis of NHANES 2001–2014. Nutrients 2018, 10, 416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Zhou, P.; Zhao, J. Structure, inhibition, and regulation of essential lipid A enzymes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2017, 1862, 1424–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Ahmed, M.; Pickova, J.; Ahmad, T.; Liaquat, M.; Farid, A.; Jahangir, M. Oxidation of Lipids in Foods. Sarhad J. Agric. 2016, 32, 230–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Johnson, D.R.; Decker, E.A. The Role of Oxygen in Lipid Oxidation Reactions: A Review. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 6, 171–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Domínguez, R.; Pateiro, M.; Gagaoua, M.; Barba, F.J.; Zhang, W.; Lorenzo, J.M. A Comprehensive Review on Lipid Oxidation in Meat and Meat Products. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Frey, P.A.; Hegeman, A.D.; Reed, G.H. Free Radical Mechanisms in Enzymology. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 3302–3316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Heck, R.T.; Saldaña, E.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Correa, L.P.; Fagundes, M.B.; Cichoski, A.J.; de Menezes, C.R.; Wagner, R.; Campagnol, P.C.B. Hydrogelled emulsion from chia and linseed oils: A promising strategy to produce low-fat burgers with a healthier lipid profile. Meat Sci. 2019, 156, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Estévez, M. Oxidative damage to poultry: From farm to fork. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 1368–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. de Lima Júnior, D.M.; do Nascimento Rangel, A.H.; Urbano, S.A.; Moreno, G.M.B. Oxidação Lipídica e Qualidade Da Carne Ovina. Acta Vet. Bras. 2013, 7, 14–28. [Google Scholar]
  41. Van Hecke, T.; Van Camp, J.; De Smet, S. Oxidation during Digestion of Meat: Interactions with the Diet and Helicobacter Pylori Gastritis, and Implications on Human Health. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017, 16, 214–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Barriuso, B.; Astiasarán, I.; Ansorena, D. A review of analytical methods measuring lipid oxidation status in foods: A challenging task. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2013, 236, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Králová, M. The Effect of Lipid Oxidation on the Quality of Meat and Meat Products. Maso. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 2, 125–132. [Google Scholar]
  44. Chaijan, M.; Panpipat, W. Mechanism of Oxidation in Foods of Animal Origin. In Natural Antioxidants; Apple Academic Press, Inc.: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017; pp. 21–58. [Google Scholar]
  45. Amaral, A.B.; da Silva, M.V.; Lannes, S.C.D.S. Lipid oxidation in meat: Mechanisms and protective factors—A review. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 38, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Miyashita, K.; Uemura, M.; Hosokawa, M. Effective Prevention of Oxidative Deterioration of Fish Oil: Focus on Flavor Deterioration. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 9, 209–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Mariutti, L.R.B.; Bragagnolo, N. Influence of salt on lipid oxidation in meat and seafood products: A review. Food Res. Int. 2017, 94, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Wang, B.; Adhikari, B.; Barrow, C.J. Optimisation of the microencapsulation of tuna oil in gelatin–sodium hexametaphosphate using complex coacervation. Food Chem. 2014, 158, 358–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pingret, D.; Fabiano-Tixier, A.-S.; Chemat, F. Degradation during application of ultrasound in food processing: A review. Food Control 2013, 31, 593–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Odeyemi, O.A.; Alegbeleye, O.O.; Strateva, M.; Stratev, D. Understanding spoilage microbial community and spoilage mechanisms in foods of animal origin. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 311–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Wali, M.K.; Abed, M.M. Antibacterial Activity of Acetic Acid against Different Types of Bacteria Causes Food Spoilage. Plant Arch. 2019, 19, 1827–1831. [Google Scholar]
  52. Shao, P.; Liu, L.; Yu, J.; Lin, Y.; Gao, H.; Chen, H.; Sun, P. An overview of intelligent freshness indicator packaging for food quality and safety monitoring. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 118, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Blackburn, C.D.W. Managing microbial food spoilage: An overview. In Food Spoilage Microorganisms; Woodhead Publishing Ltd.: Cambridge, UK, 2006; pp. 147–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bai A, J.; Rai Vittal, R. Quorum Sensing Regulation and Inhibition of Exoenzyme Production and Biofilm Formation in the Food Spoilage Bacteria Pseudomonas psychrophila PSPF19. Food Biotechnol. 2014, 28, 293–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gram, L.; Ravn, L.; Rasch, M.; Bruhn, J.B.; Christensen, A.B.; Givskov, M. Food spoilage—Interactions between food spoilage bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2002, 78, 79–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gutiérrez-Del-Río, I.; Fernández, J.; Lombó, F. Plant nutraceuticals as antimicrobial agents in food preservation: Terpenoids, polyphenols and thiols. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2018, 52, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gänzle, M.G. Lactic metabolism revisited: Metabolism of lactic acid bacteria in food fermentations and food spoilage. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2015, 2, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Snyder, A.B.; Worobo, R.W. Fungal Spoilage in Food Processing. J. Food Prot. 2018, 81, 1035–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Gammariello, D.; Conte, A.; Lucera, A.; Mastromatteo, M.; Del Nobile, M.A. Anti-yeast activity of natural compounds: In vitro and in vivo tests. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2014, 1, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pellissery, A.J.; Vinayamohan, P.G.; Amalaradjou, M.A.R.; Venkitanarayanan, K. Spoilage Bacteria and Meat Quality. In Meat Quality Analysis; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 307–334. ISBN 978-0-12-819233-7. [Google Scholar]
  61. Deschuyffeleer, N.; Audenaert, K.; Samapundo, S.; Ameye, S.; Eeckhout, M.; Devlieghere, F. Identification and characterization of yeasts causing chalk mould defects on par-baked bread. Food Microbiol. 2011, 28, 1019–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Saranraj, P.; Geetha, M. Microbial Spoilage of Bakery Products and Its Control by Preservatives. Int. J. Pharm. Biol. Arch. 2010, 3, 38–48. [Google Scholar]
  63. Hocking, A.D.; Faedo, M. Fungi causing thread mould spoilage of vacuum packaged Cheddar cheese during maturation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1992, 16, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Snyder, A.B.; Worobo, R.W. The incidence and impact of microbial spoilage in the production of fruit and vegetable juices as reported by juice manufacturers. Food Control 2018, 85, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Aljamali, N.; Najim, M.; Alabbasy, A. Review on Food Poisoning (Types, Causes, Symptoms, Diagnosis, Treatment). Global Acad. J. Pharm. Drug Res. 2021, 3, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Dietrich, R.; Jessberger, N.; Ehling-Schulz, M.; Märtlbauer, E.; Granum, P.E. The Food Poisoning Toxins of Bacillus cereus. Toxins 2021, 13, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Panel, E.B.; Koutsoumanis, K.; Allende, A.; Alvarez-Ordóñez, A.; Bover-Cid, S.; Chemaly, M.; Davies, R.; De Cesare, A.; Herman, L.; Hilbert, F.; et al. Pathogenicity assessment of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and the public health risk posed by contamination of food with STEC. EFSA J. 2020, 18, e05967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Nurjayadi, M.; Pertiwi, Y.P.; Islami, N.; Azizah, N.; Efrianti, U.R.; Saamia, V.; Wiranatha, I.M.; Nastassya, L.; El-Enshasye, H.A. Detection of the Salmonella typhi bacteria in contaminated egg using real-time PCR to develop rapid detection of food poisoning bacteria. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019, 20, 101214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Grispoldi, L.; Karama, M.; Armani, A.; Hadjicharalambous, C.; Cenci-Goga, B.T. Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin in food of animal origin and staphylococcal food poisoning risk assessment from farm to table. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2021, 20, 677–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Amit, S.K.; Uddin, M.; Rahman, R.; Islam, S.M.R.; Khan, M.S. A review on mechanisms and commercial aspects of food preservation and processing. Agric. Food Secur. 2017, 6, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hernández-Hernández, H.M.; Moreno-Vilet, L.; Villanueva-Rodríguez, S.J. Current status of emerging food processing technologies in Latin America: Novel non-thermal processing. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2019, 58, 102233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhang, Z.-H.; Wang, L.-H.; Zeng, X.-A.; Han, Z.; Brennan, C.S. Non-thermal technologies and its current and future application in the food industry: A review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Jadhav, H.B.; Annapure, U.S.; Deshmukh, R.R. Non-thermal Technologies for Food Processing. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 657090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Alexandre, E.M.C.; Pinto, C.A.; Moreira, S.A.; Pintado, M.; Saraiva, J.A. 5-Nonthermal Food Processing/Preservation Technologies. In Saving Food; Galanakis, C.M., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, CA, USA, 2019; pp. 141–169. ISBN 978-0-12-815357-4. [Google Scholar]
  75. Režek Jambrak, A.; Vukušić, T.; Donsi′, F.; Paniwnyk, L.; Djekic, I. Three Pillars of Novel Nonthermal Food Technologies: Food Safety, Quality, and Environment. J. Food Qual. 2018, 2018, 8619707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Singh, V.P. Recent approaches in food bio-preservation—A review. Open Vet. J. 2018, 8, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Ganguly, S. Basic Principles for Effective Food Preservation: A Review. Int. J. Pure App. Biosci. 2013, 1, 84–85. [Google Scholar]
  78. Xiang, H.; Sun-Waterhouse, D.; Waterhouse, G.I.N.; Cui, C.; Ruan, Z. Fermentation-enabled wellness foods: A fresh perspective. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2019, 8, 203–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Davidson, P.M.; Sofos, J.N.; Branen, A.L. Antimicrobials in Food; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  80. Mohammadzadeh-Aghdash, H.; Akbari, N.; Esazadeh, K.; Ezzati Nazhad Dolatabadi, J. Molecular and technical aspects on the interaction of serum albumin with multifunctional food preservatives. Food Chem. 2019, 293, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Vandenberg, L.N.; Bugos, J. Assessing the Public Health Implications of the Food Preservative Propylparaben: Has This Chemical Been Safely Used for Decades. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2021, 8, 54–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Linke, B.G.O.; Casagrande, T.A.C.; Cardoso, L.A.C. Food additives and their health effects: A review on preservative sodium benzoate. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2018, 17, 306–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Gokoglu, N. Novel natural food preservatives and applications in seafood preservation: A review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 2068–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Dwivedi, S.; Prajapati, P.; Vyas, N.; Malviya, S.; Kharia, A. A Review on Food Preservation. Asian J. Pharm. Pharmacol 2017, 3, 193–199. [Google Scholar]
  85. Hamid, A.; Risikat, A.; Sururah, A. Food: Its Preservatives, Additives and Applications. Int. J. Chem. Biochem. Sci. 2012, 1, 36–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Bashir, K.M.I.; Kim, J.-S.; An, J.H.; Sohn, J.H.; Choi, J.-S. Natural Food Additives and Preservatives for Fish-Paste Products: A Review of the Past, Present, and Future States of Research. J. Food Qual. 2017, 2017, 9675469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Smith-Palmer, A.; Stewart, J.; Fyfe, L. The potential application of plant essential oils as natural food preservatives in soft cheese. Food Microbiol. 2001, 18, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ordoudi, S.A.; Papapostolou, M.; Nenadis, N.; Mantzouridou, F.T.; Tsimidou, M.Z. Bay Laurel (Laurus nobilis L.) Essential Oil as a Food Preservative Source: Chemistry, Quality Control, Activity Assessment, and Applications to Olive Industry Products. Foods 2022, 11, 752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Bouarab Chibane, L.; Degraeve, P.; Ferhout, H.; Bouajila, J.; Oulahal, N. Plant antimicrobial polyphenols as potential natural food preservatives. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 1457–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Efenberger-Szmechtyk, M.; Nowak, A.; Czyzowska, A. Plant extracts rich in polyphenols: Antibacterial agents and natural preservatives for meat and meat products. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 149–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Harun, N.H.; Rasdi, N.A.; Salleh, R.M.; Safuan, S.; Ahmad, W.A.N.W.; Fuad, W.E.M. Subacute Toxicity Evaluation of Methanolic Extract of Syzygium Polyanthum in Rats. Trop. Life Sci. Res. 2021, 32, 65–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Widyawati, T.; Yusoff, N.A.; Asmawi, M.Z.; Ahmad, M. Antihyperglycemic Effect of Methanol Extract of Syzygium polyanthum (Wight.) Leaf in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats. Nutrients 2015, 7, 7764–7780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Ismail, A.; Ahmad, W.A.N.W. Syzygium Polyanthum (Wight) Walp: A Potential Phytomedicine. Pharmacogn. J. 2019, 11, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Dewijanti, I.D.; Artanti, N.; Mangunwardoyo, W.; Hanafi, M.; Abbas, J.; Megawati, M.; Minarti, M.; Musdalifah, D.; Meilawati, L. Bioactivities of Syzygium Polyanthum (Wight) Walp leaf extract for decreasing diabetic risk. AIP Conf. Proc. 2018, 2024, 020011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Widjajakusuma, E.C.; Jonosewojo, A.; Hendriati, L.; Wijaya, S.; Ferawati; Surjadhana, A.; Sastrowardoyo, W.; Monita, N.; Muna, N.M.; Fajarwati, R.P.; et al. Phytochemical screening and preliminary clinical trials of the aqueous extract mixture of Andrographis paniculata (Burm. f.) Wall. ex Nees and Syzygium Polyanthum (Wight.) Walp leaves in metformin treated patients with type 2 diabetes. Phytomedicine 2019, 55, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Hasan, R.; Gontar Alamsyah, S.; Lindarto, D. The effect of bay leaf extract (Syzygium Polyanthum) on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and CD31 (PECAM-1) expression in acute coronary syndrome. Med. Glas. Ljek. Komore Zenicko-Doboj. Kantona 2020, 17, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Prianwari, C.; Syafril, S. Relationship Between Triglycerides And Glucose Index (TyG) And Lipid Profile In Patients With Dyslipidemia Treated With Bay Leaf Extract [Syzygium Polyanthum (Wight) Walp]. J. Endocrinol. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. (JETROMI) 2020, 2, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Komaria, R.; Lister, I.N.E.; Lie, S. Hematological Profiles of Benzene-Induced Rats Treated with Ethanolic Extract of Syzygium Polyanthum. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Health, Instrumentation & Measurement, and Natural Sciences (InHeNce), Medan, Indonesia, 14–16 July 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  99. Muhammad, D.S.; Salim, H.M.; Virlliana, C.D.; Donastin, A.; Adriansyah, A.A. The effect of Syzygium Polyanthum (wight) extract in histological changes of kidney in diabetic mice model. Bali Med. J. 2022, 11, 1301–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Suwito, B.E.; Shanty, L.M.; Gumilang, R.; Handayani, H.; Ulhaq, R.A. Effect of Bay Leaf (Syzygium Polyanthum) Extract on Antioxidant Activity, MDA Levels, and Liver Histopathology Feature of Ethambutol Induced Wistar Rats. Indones. J. Med. Lab. Sci. Technol. 2022, 4, 148–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Muliani, L.; Puspita, G.; Anggai, R.A. Test the Effectiveness of Bay Leaf Extract (Syzygium Polyanthum) in Lowering Uric Acid Levels in Male White Rats (Rattus Novergicus). J. Health Technol. Sci. (JHTS) 2021, 2, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Sandikapura, M.J.; Nyamathulla, S.; Noordin, M.I. Comparative Antioxidant and Antidiabetic Effects of Syzygium Polyanthum Leaf and Momordica Charantia Fruit Extracts. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 31, 623–636. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  103. Ramadhania, N.R.; Purnomo, A.S.; Fatmawati, S. Antibacterial activities of Syzygium Polyanthum wight leaves. AIP Conf. Proc. 2018, 2049, 020024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Uddin, A.B.M.N.; Hossain, F.; Reza, A.S.M.A.; Nasrin, M.S.; Alam, A.H.M.K. Traditional uses, pharmacological activities, and phytochemical constituents of the genus Syzygium: A review. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 10, 1789–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Wahjuni, S.; Wita, I.W. Hypoglycemic and antioxidant effects of Syzygium Polyanthum leaves extract on alloxan induced hyperglycemic Wistar Rats. Bali Med. J. 2017, 6, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Syabana, M.A.; Yuliana, N.D.; Batubara, I.; Fardiaz, D. α-glucosidase inhibitors from Syzygium Polyanthum (Wight) Walp leaves as revealed by metabolomics and in silico approaches. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022, 282, 114618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Sulistiyani; Falah, S.; Wahyuni, W.T.; Sugahara, T.; Tachibana, S.; Syaefudin. Cellular Mechanism of the Cytotoxic Effect of Extracts from Syzygium Polyanthum Leaves. Am. J. Drug Discov. Dev. 2014, 4, 90–101. [Google Scholar]
  108. Syarifah, A.L.; Retnowati, R.; Soebiantoro, S. Characterization of Secondary Metabolites Profile of Flavonoid from Salam Leaves (Eugenia Polyantha) Using TLC and UV Spectrophotometry. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2019, 6, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Annisa, M.; Harsini, H.; Murti, Y.B. Potential Effect of Bay Leaf (Syzygium Polyanthum [Wight] Walp.) Essential Oil for Herbal Toothpaste Active Agent. Maj. Obat Tradis. 2022, 27, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Hamad, A.; Mahardika, M.G.P.; Yuliani, I.; Hartanti, D. Chemical Constituents and Antimicrobial Activities of Essential Oils of Syzygium Polyanthum and Syzygium Aromaticum. Rasayan J. Chem. 2017, 10, 564–569. [Google Scholar]
  111. Kadir, N.; Salleh, W.M.N.H.W.; Ghani, N. A Systematic Review on Essential Oils and Biological Activities of the Genus Syzygium (Myrtaceae). Riv. Ital. Delle Sostanze Grasse 2022, 99, 165–178. [Google Scholar]
  112. Bakkali, F.; Averbeck, S.; Averbeck, D.; Idaomar, M. Biological Effects of Essential Oils-A Review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Cömert, E.D.; Gökmen, V. Evolution of food antioxidants as a core topic of food science for a century. Food Res. Int. 2018, 105, 76–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Mcclements, D.J.; Decker, E.A. Lipid Oxidation in Oil-in-Water Emulsions: Impact of Molecular Environment on Chemical Reactions in Heterogeneous Food Systems. J. Food Sci. 2000, 65, 1270–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Shah, M.A.; Bosco, S.J.D.; Mir, S.A. Plant extracts as natural antioxidants in meat and meat products. Meat Sci. 2014, 98, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Secci, G.; Parisi, G. From farm to fork: Lipid oxidation in fish products. A review. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 15, 124–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Gulcin, İ. Antioxidants and antioxidant methods: An updated overview. Arch. Toxicol. 2020, 94, 651–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Pisoschi, A.M.; Pop, A.; Iordache, F.; Stanca, L.; Predoi, G.; Serban, A.I. Oxidative stress mitigation by antioxidants—An overview on their chemistry and influences on health status. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 209, 112891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Carsono, N.; Tumilaar, S.G.; Kurnia, D.; Latipudin, D.; Satari, M.H. A Review of Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Activity Properties of Piper Species. Molecules 2022, 27, 6774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Liang, N.; Kitts, D.D. Antioxidant Property of Coffee Components: Assessment of Methods that Define Mechanisms of Action. Molecules 2014, 19, 19180–19208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Sumiwi, S.A.; Zuhrotun, A.; Hendriani, R.; Rizal, M.; Levita, J.; Megantara, S. Subchronic Toxicity of Ethanol Extract of Syzygium Polyanthum (Wight) Walp. Leaves on Wistar Rat. Indones. Biomed. J. 2019, 11, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Abd Rahim, E.N.A.; Ismail, A.; Omar, M.N.; Rahmat, U.N.; Wan Ahmad, W.A.N. GC-MS Analysis of Phytochemical Compounds in Syzygium Polyanthum Leaves Extracted using Ultrasound-Assisted Method. Pharmacogn. J. 2017, 10, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Umaru, I.J.; Umaru, K.I.; Umaru, H.A. Phytochemical Screening, Isolation, Characterization of Bioactive and Biological Activity of Bungkang, (Syzygium Polyanthum) Root-Bark Essential Oil. Korean J. Food Health Converg. 2020, 6, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. de Oliveira, V.S.; Ferreira, F.S.; Cople, M.C.R.; Labre, T.D.S.; Augusta, I.M.; Gamallo, O.D.; Saldanha, T. Use of Natural Antioxidants in the Inhibition of Cholesterol Oxidation: A Review: Inhibition of Cholesterol Oxidation. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2018, 17, 1465–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Zeb, A. Concept, mechanism, and applications of phenolic antioxidants in foods. J. Food Biochem. 2020, 44, e13394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Andriani, R.; Subroto, T.; Ishmayana, S.; Kurnia, D. Enhancement Methods of Antioxidant Capacity in Rice Bran: A Review. Foods 2022, 11, 2994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Perumal, S.; Mahmud, R.; Piaru, S.P.; Cai, L.W.; Ramanathan, S. Potential Antiradical Activity and Cytotoxicity Assessment of Ziziphus mauritiana and Syzygium Polyanthum. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 8, 535–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Hidayati, M.D.; Ersam, T.; Shimizu, K.; Fatmawati, S. Antioxidant Activity of Syzygium Polyanthum Extracts. Indones. J. Chem. 2017, 17, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Pratama, B.P.; Supriyadi; Swasono, R.T.; Pranoto, Y. Different leaf maturities and withering durations affect the antioxidant potential and aroma compound of Indonesian bay leaf [Syzygium Polyanthum (Wight) Walp.]. Int. Food Res. J. 2021, 28, 1196–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Mahmoud, A.D.; Ali, A.M.; Khandaker, M.M.; Fatihah, H.N.N.; Awang, N.A.; Mat, N. Discrimination of Syzygium Polyanthum Cultivars (Wight) Walp Based on Essential Oil Composition. J. Agrobiotechnol. 2019, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  131. Widyawati, T.; Roslan, N.A.B.; Yusoff, N.A. The Evaluation of Antioxidant and Free Radical Scavenging Activities of Eugenia Polyantha Leaves Extracts. Int. J. ChemTech Res. 2016, 9, 465–471. [Google Scholar]
  132. Ramadhania, Z.M.; Insanu, M.; Gunarti, N.S.; Wirasutisna, K.R.; Sukrasno, S.; Hartati, R. Antioxidant activity from ten species of myrtaceae. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2017, 10, 5–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Fei, P.; Ali, M.A.; Gong, S.; Sun, Q.; Bi, X.; Liu, S.; Guo, L. Antimicrobial activity and mechanism of action of olive oil polyphenols extract against Cronobacter sakazakii. Food Control 2018, 94, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. ′Afifah, A.N.; Zuprizal; Dono, N.D. In vitro antibacterial activities of Syzygium Polyanthum leaves extract-nanoparticle against Salmonella typhimurium, Escherchia coli, and Lactobacillus acidophilus. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 782, 022093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Kusumaningrum, M.; Prasetiawan, H.; Setiyorini, N.; Anis, A.; Rengga, W.D.P. Optimization of Terpenoid Extraction from Bay (Syzygium Polyanthum) Leaves Using Ethanol as a Solvent by an Ultrasonic Wave Technology. Int. J. Res. Innov. Entrep. 2020, 1, 35–42. [Google Scholar]
  136. Windaryanti, D.; Gabriel, C.S.; Hidayat, I.W.; Zainuddin, A.; Dharsono, H.D.A.; Satari, M.H.; Kurnia, D. The Potential of 24-Propylcholestrol as Antibacterial Oral Bacteria of Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 and Inhibitor Biofilms Formation: In vitro and in silico Study. Adv. Appl. Bioinform. Chem. 2022, 15, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Gill, A.O.; Holley, R.A. Mechanisms of Bactericidal Action of Cinnamaldehyde against Listeria Monocytogenes and of Eugenol against L. Monocytogenes and Lactobacillus Sakei. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 5750–5755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Wang, H.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, K.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Y. Antioxidant, Hypoglycemic and Molecular Docking Studies of Methanolic Extract, Fractions and Isolated Compounds from Aerial Parts of Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf. Molecules 2022, 27, 2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Iskandi, S.; Fauziah, F.; Oktavia, S. Antibacterial Activity of Syzygium Polyanthum. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Med. 2021, 6, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Hakim, R.F.; Fakhrurrazi, F.; Ferisa, W. Pengaruh Air Rebusan Daun Salam (Eugenia Polyantha Wight) Terhadap Pertumbuhan Enterococcus Faecalis. J. Syiah Kuala Dent. Soc. 2016, 1, 21–28. [Google Scholar]
  141. Miksusanti, M.; Herlina, H.; Masril, K.M.K. Antibacterial and Antioxidant of Uwi (Dioscorea Alata L) Starch Edible Film Incorporated with Ginger Essential Oil. Int. J. Biosci. Biochem. Bioinforma. 2013, 3, 354–356. [Google Scholar]
  142. Sikkema, J.A.N.; de Bont, J.A.; Poolman, B. Mechanisms of Membrane Toxicity of Hydrocarbons. Microbiol. Rev. 1995, 59, 201–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Satta, G.; Cornaglia, G.; Mazzariol, A.; Golini, G.; Valisena, S.; Fontana, R. Target for bacteriostatic and bactericidal activities of beta-lactam antibiotics against Escherichia coli resides in different penicillin-binding proteins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1995, 39, 812–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Tortora, M.L.; Díaz-Ricci, J.C.; Pedraza, R.O. Protection of strawberry plants (Fragaria ananassa Duch.) against anthracnose disease induced by Azospirillum brasilense. Plant Soil 2011, 356, 279–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Tiwari, B.K.; Valdramidis, V.P.; O′Donnell, C.P.; Muthukumarappan, K.; Bourke, P.; Cullen, P.J. Application of Natural Antimicrobials for Food Preservation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 5987–6000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Konaté, K.; Hilou, A.; Mavoungou, J.F.; Lepengué, A.N.; Souza, A.; Barro, N.; Datté, J.Y.; M′batchi, B.; Nacoulma, O.G. Antimicrobial Activity of Polyphenol-Rich Fractions from Sida Alba L.(Malvaceae) against Co-Trimoxazol-Resistant Bacteria Strains. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2012, 11, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Putri, S.A.; Nur Shadrina, A.A.; Julaeha, E.; Kurnia, D. Potential Nevadensin from Ocimum basilicum as Antibacterial Agent against Streptococcus mutans: In Vitro and In Silico Studies. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2023, 26, 1746–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Lau, K.Y.; Rukayadi, Y. Screening of Tropical Medicinal Plants for Sporicidal Activity. Int. Food Res. J. 2015, 22, 421. [Google Scholar]
  149. Nurjanah, N.; Herijulianti, E.; Putri, M.H.; Sukmasari, S. Eugenia polyantha (Wight) infusion against oral microorganisms on toothbrushes. Sci. Dent. J. 2020, 4, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Pavase, T.R.; Lin, H.; Shaikh, Q.; Hussain, S.; Li, Z.; Ahmed, I.; Lv, L.; Sun, L.; Shah, S.B.H.; Kalhoro, M.T. Recent advances of conjugated polymer (CP) nanocomposite-based chemical sensors and their applications in food spoilage detection: A comprehensive review. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 273, 1113–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Neelofar, K.; Shreaz, S.; Rimple, B.; Muralidhar, S.; Nikhat, M.; Khan, L.A. Curcumin as a promising anticandidal of clinical interest. Can. J. Microbiol. 2011, 57, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Siswina, T.; Rustama, M.M.; Sumiarsa, D.; Kurnia, D. Phytochemical profiling of Piper crocatum and its antifungal activity as Lanosterol 14 alpha demethylase CYP51 inhibitor: A review. F1000Research 2022, 11, 1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Cui, H.; Gabriel, A.A.; Nakano, H. Antimicrobial efficacies of plant extracts and sodium nitrite against Clostridium botulinum. Food Control 2010, 21, 1030–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Lau, K.Y.; Zainin, N.S.; Abas, F.; Rukayadi, Y. Antibacterial and Sporicidal Activity of Eugenia Polyantha Wight against Bacillus Cereus and Bacillus Subtilis. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2014, 3, 499–510. [Google Scholar]
  155. Abd Wahab, N.Z.; Aqilah Ja’afar, N.S. Phytochemical Composition and Antibacterial Activities of Syzygium Polyanthum Methanolic Leaves Extract. Pharmacogn. J. 2021, 13, 1355–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Wong, J.X.; Ramli, S.; Rukayadi, Y.; Juhari, N.K.K.; Radu, S.; Abd Wahid, N.B. Antifungal Activity of Ethanolic Extract of Syzygium Polyanthum (Wight) Walp. Leaves Extract Against Several Types of Filamentous Fungi and Candida Species. Malays. J. Microsc. 2022, 18, 136–146. [Google Scholar]
  157. Fitri, K.S.A.; Ramdhani, D.; Mustarichie, R. Comparative Study on Activities of Anti Bacillary Dysentery Shigella Dysenteriae of Syzygium Polyanthum and Dracaena Angustifolia Leaves Ethanol Extracts. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2017, 10, 348–352. [Google Scholar]
  158. Ramli, S.; Radu, S.; Shaari, K.; Rukayadi, Y. Antibacterial Activity of Ethanolic Extract of Syzygium polyanthum L. (Salam) Leaves against Foodborne Pathogens and Application as Food Sanitizer. BioMed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 9024246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Kusuma, S.A.F.; Purnamasari, E.; Herawati, I.E. Syzygium Polyanthum (Wight) Walp. Leaves Extract as the Antifungal Agent for Oral Candidiasis. Drug Invent. Today 2019, 12, 1339–1342. [Google Scholar]
  160. Aldhaher, Z.A.; Merza, W.M.; Almelan, M.F.; Shaker, R.M.; Yas, L.S. Effectiveness of Bay Leaves Aqueous Extract on Streptococcus Mutans in Comparision to Chlorhexidine Gluconate. IOSR-J. Pharm. Bio. Sci. 2017, 12, 12–16. [Google Scholar]
  161. Hamad, A.; Djali, A.D.; Dewi, D.Y.S.; Saputri, E.Y.; Nurlaeli, E.; Fadlilah, I.N.; Mentari, M.; Hartanti, D. The microbial growth inhibition profile of selected indonesian spices essential oils on tofu during 8-day storage. J. Chem. Process Mater. Technol. 2022, 1, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Rawat, S. Food Spoilage: Microorganisms and Their Prevention. Asian J. Plant Sci. Res. 2015, 5, 47–56. [Google Scholar]
  163. Silva, M.M.; Lidon, F. Food preservatives—An overview on applications and side effects. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2016, 28, 366–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Rathod, N.B.; Ranveer, R.C.; Bhagwat, P.K.; Ozogul, F.; Benjakul, S.; Pillai, S.; Annapure, U.S. Cold plasma for the preservation of aquatic food products: An overview. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 4407–4425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Daniloski, D.; Gjorgjijoski, D.; Trajkovska Petkoska, A. Advances in Active Packaging: Perspectives in Packaging of Meat and Dairy Products. Adv. Mater. Lett. 2020, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Roopa, H.; Panghal, A.; Kumari, A.; Chhikara, N.; Sehgal, E.; Rawat, K. Active Packaging in Food Industry. In Novel Technologies in Food Science; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2023; pp. 375–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Ritota, M.; Manzi, P. Natural Preservatives from Plant in Cheese Making. Animals 2020, 10, 749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Negi, P.S. Plant extracts for the control of bacterial growth: Efficacy, stability and safety issues for food application. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 156, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Campêlo, M.C.S.; Medeiros, J.M.S.; Silva, J.B.A. Natural Products in Food Preservation. Int. Food Res. J. 2019, 26, 41–46. [Google Scholar]
  170. Dewijanti, I.D.; Mangunwardoyo, W.; Dwianti, A.; Hanafi, M.; Artanti, N.; Mozef, T.; Devi, A.F. Antimicrobial activity of bay leaf (Syzygium Polyanthum (wight) walp) extracted using various solvent. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019, 2175, 020021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Antolak, H.; Kregiel, D. Food Preservatives from Plants. Food Addit. 2017, 1, 45–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  172. Sahari, M.A.; Asgari, S. Effects of Plants Bioactive Compounds on Foods Microbial Spoilage and Lipid Oxidation. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 1, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Atta, E.M.; Mohamed, N.H.; Abdelgawad, A.A.M. Antioxidants: An overview on the natural and synthetic types. Eur. Chem. Bull. 2017, 6, 365–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Shahidi, F. Handbook of Antioxidants for Food Preservation; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  175. García-Pérez, P.; Losada-Barreiro, S.; Bravo-Díaz, C.; Gallego, P.P. Exploring the Use of Bryophyllum as Natural Source of Bioactive Compounds with Antioxidant Activity to Prevent Lipid Oxidation of Fish Oil-In-Water Emulsions. Plants 2020, 9, 1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Litwinienko, G.; Ingold, K.U. Solvent Effects on the Rates and Mechanisms of Reaction of Phenols with Free Radicals. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Ross, A.B.; Kamal-Eldin, A.; Lundin, E.A.; Zhang, J.-X.; Hallmans, G.; Åman, P. Cereal Alkylresorcinols Are Absorbed by Humans. J. Nutr. 2003, 133, 2222–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  178. Rasmussen, H.M.; Johnson, E.J. Nutrients for the aging eye. Clin. Interv. Aging 2013, 8, 741–7418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  179. Noon, J.; Mills, T.B.; Norton, I.T. The use of natural antioxidants to combat lipid oxidation in O/W emulsions. J. Food Eng. 2020, 281, 110006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Decker, E.A.; Warner, K.; Richards, M.P.; Shahidi, F. Measuring Antioxidant Effectiveness in Food. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 4303–4310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Shahidi, F.; Zhong, Y. Lipid oxidation and improving the oxidative stability. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 4067–4079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Shahidi, F. Lipid-Derived Flavors in Meat Products. In Meat Process Improving Quality; Kerry, J., Kerry, J., Ledward, D., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Cambridge, UK, 2002; pp. 105–121. [Google Scholar]
  183. Damayanti, A.N.; Riyadi, P.H.; Dewi, E.N. Characteristic and boactive potential of brewed Sargassum sp. with the additional bay leaf (Syzygium Polyanthum). IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 890, 012044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Jati, P.Z. Pengaruh Perendaman Jus Daun Salam Syzygium Polyanthum (Wight) terhadap Kandungan Asam Lemak Bebas, Total Volatile Bases dan Antioksidan Pada Telur Asin ASAP. J. Tek. Ind. Terintegrasi 2021, 4, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Agustina, K.K.; Sari, P.H.; Suada, I.K. Pengaruh Perendaman pada Infusa Daun Salam terhadap Kualitas dan Daya Tahan Daging Babi. Bul. Vet. Udayana 2017, 9, 34–41. [Google Scholar]
  186. Suada, I.K.; Purnama, D.I.D.; Agustina, K.K. Infusa Daun Salam Mempertahankan Kualitas Dan Daya Tahan Daging Sapi Bali. Bul. Vet. Udayana 2018, 10, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  187. Rasini Pirimoy, P.C.; Rohadi, R.; Iswoyo, I. Penggunaan Ekstrak Etanol Daun Salam (Syzygium Polyanthum Wight) pada Sosis Daging Sapi untuk Penghambatan Kerusakan Oksidatif. J. Teknol. dan Ind. Pertan. Indones. 2019, 11, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  188. Aini, V.A.W.A.N.; Dewi, D.P.A.R.K. Uji Aktivitas Antioksidan Fraksi Etil Asetat Daun Salam (Syzygium Polyanthum) Dan Uji Bilangan Peroksida-Nya Terhadap Minyak Goreng Curah. Food Technol. Halal Sci. J. 2018, 1, 55–63. [Google Scholar]
  189. Wahyudi, V.A.; Aini, A.N.; Puspita, D.; Dewi, A.R.K. The Bay Leaves Active Compounds and Its Lipid Oxidative Inhibition Activity in Bulk Cooking Oil. Planta Trop. J. Agrosains J. Agro Sci. 2021, 9, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Lelono, R.A.A. Potential Antioxidative and Antifungal Activities From Eugenia polyantha Wight. Widyariset 2012, 15, 437–445. [Google Scholar]
  191. Agustina, K.K.; Mardyawati, I.A.P.A.; Suada, I.K. The Quality and Antioxidant Content of Salted Eggs Made By Addition of Bay Leave Crude Extract on the Salting Media. Adv. Trop. Biodivers. Environ. Sci. 2019, 3, 37–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Sari, I.P.L. Analisis Mutu Aktivitas Antioksidan Fraksi Daun Salam (Syzygium Polyanthum) Terhadap Masa Simpan Permen Jelly. Ph.D. Thesis, Stikes Karya Putra Bangsa Tulungagung, Tulungagung Regency, Indonesia, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  193. Nazir, F.; Salim, R.; Yousf, N.; Bashir, M.; Naik, H.R.; Hussain, S.Z. Natural Antimicrobials for Food Preservation. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2017, 6, 2078–2082. [Google Scholar]
  194. Friedman, M.; Henika, P.R.; Levin, C.E.; Mandrell, R.E. Antibacterial Activities of Plant Essential Oils and Their Components against Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica in Apple Juice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 6042–6048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Suryanto, E.; Jamhari, J.; Afidah, U.; Utami, N.A. Physical and Microbial Quality of Broiler Chicken Meat Soaked in Syzygium Polyanthum Infusion with Different Storage Time. In Proceedings of the 9th International Seminar on Tropical Animal Production (ISTAP 2021), Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 21–22 September 2021. [Google Scholar]
  196. Kusumaningrum, A.; Widiyaningrum, P.; Mubarok, I. Penurunan Total Bakteri Daging Ayam dengan Perlakuan Perendaman Infusa Daun Salam (Syzygium Polyanthum). Indones. J. Math. Nat. Sci. 2013, 36, 14–19. [Google Scholar]
  197. Hartanti, D.; Djalil, A.D.; Hamad, A.; Yulianingsih, N. The Effect of Infusion of Syzygium Polyanthum (Wight) Walp. Leaves as Natural Preservative Chicken Meats. J. Kefarmasian Indones. 2019, 9, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Ramli, S.; Lim, L.Y.; Samsudin, N.I.P.; Rukayadi, Y. Effect of Salam [Syzygium Polyanthum (Wigt) Walp.] Leaves Extract on the Microorganism Population in Chicken Meat and Shrimp and Their Sensory. Int. Food Res. J. 2018, 25, 928–935. [Google Scholar]
  199. Naja, B.K. Pengaruh Berbagai Konsentrasi Ekstrak Daun Salam (Syzygium Polyanthum W.) Dan Lama Penyimpanan Terhadap Kualitas Ikan Nila Segar Sebagai Sumber Belajar Biologi. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, Indonesia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  200. Iriani, Y.; Ramona, Y.; Astiti, N.P.A. Efektifitas daun salam dalam mengurangi cemaran mikroba penyebab busuk telur itik. Intisari Sains Medis 2022, 13, 352–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Lipid auto-oxidation stages [36,42,45]. (a) Initiation; (b) Propagation; (c) Termination.
Figure 1. Lipid auto-oxidation stages [36,42,45]. (a) Initiation; (b) Propagation; (c) Termination.
Foods 12 02275 g001aFoods 12 02275 g001b
Figure 2. The compounds in S. polyanthum ethanol extract: (1) phytol; (2) (Z)-1,3-phytadiene; (3) cyclopentane; (4) phytol acetate; (5) 2-hecadecene,3,7,15-tetramethyl; (6) cis-1,3-dimethyl-4-aza phenanthrene; (7) malic acid; (8) gallic acid; (9) protocatechuic acid; (10) epigallocatechin gallate; (11) myricetin-3-O-rhamnoside; (12) luteic acid; and (13) desmanthin-1.
Figure 2. The compounds in S. polyanthum ethanol extract: (1) phytol; (2) (Z)-1,3-phytadiene; (3) cyclopentane; (4) phytol acetate; (5) 2-hecadecene,3,7,15-tetramethyl; (6) cis-1,3-dimethyl-4-aza phenanthrene; (7) malic acid; (8) gallic acid; (9) protocatechuic acid; (10) epigallocatechin gallate; (11) myricetin-3-O-rhamnoside; (12) luteic acid; and (13) desmanthin-1.
Foods 12 02275 g002
Figure 3. Flavonoid compounds of S. polyanthum: (14) 5,3′,4′-trihydroxyflavone-3-C-glycoside; (15) 5,4′,5′-trihydroxyflavone-3-C-; (16) 5,6,3′,4′-tetrahydroxyflavone; (17) 5,6,4′,5′-tetrahydroxyflavone; (18) 5,3′,4′-trihydroxyflavone; and (19) 5,4′,5′-trihydroxyflavone.
Figure 3. Flavonoid compounds of S. polyanthum: (14) 5,3′,4′-trihydroxyflavone-3-C-glycoside; (15) 5,4′,5′-trihydroxyflavone-3-C-; (16) 5,6,3′,4′-tetrahydroxyflavone; (17) 5,6,4′,5′-tetrahydroxyflavone; (18) 5,3′,4′-trihydroxyflavone; and (19) 5,4′,5′-trihydroxyflavone.
Foods 12 02275 g003
Figure 4. The compounds in S. polyanthum essential oil: (20) cis-4-decenal; (21) 1-decyl aldehyde; (22) capryl aldehyde; (23) α-curcumene; (24) 1,2,3,3a,4,6a-hexahydropentalene; (25) farnesol; (26) decanal; (27) octanal; (28) β-ocimene; (29) α-pinene; (30) vitispirane; (31) α-copaene; (32)dodecanal; (33) trans-caryophyllene; (34) α-humulene; (35) α-gurjunene; (36) 4,11-selinadiene; (37) valencene; (38) γ-cadinene; (39) α-panasinsene; (40) nerolidol; (41) humulene oxide; (42) elemol; (43) juniper camphor; and (44) hexahydrofarnesyl acetone.
Figure 4. The compounds in S. polyanthum essential oil: (20) cis-4-decenal; (21) 1-decyl aldehyde; (22) capryl aldehyde; (23) α-curcumene; (24) 1,2,3,3a,4,6a-hexahydropentalene; (25) farnesol; (26) decanal; (27) octanal; (28) β-ocimene; (29) α-pinene; (30) vitispirane; (31) α-copaene; (32)dodecanal; (33) trans-caryophyllene; (34) α-humulene; (35) α-gurjunene; (36) 4,11-selinadiene; (37) valencene; (38) γ-cadinene; (39) α-panasinsene; (40) nerolidol; (41) humulene oxide; (42) elemol; (43) juniper camphor; and (44) hexahydrofarnesyl acetone.
Foods 12 02275 g004aFoods 12 02275 g004b
Figure 5. Antioxidant compounds of S. polyanthum essential oil: (45) pyrogallol; (46) myrecitin; (47) farnesol; and (48) tocopherol.
Figure 5. Antioxidant compounds of S. polyanthum essential oil: (45) pyrogallol; (46) myrecitin; (47) farnesol; and (48) tocopherol.
Foods 12 02275 g005
Figure 6. Antioxidant reference compounds of antioxidant analysis: (49) butylated hydroxytoluene; (50) trolox; (51) quercetine; and (52) ascorbic acid.
Figure 6. Antioxidant reference compounds of antioxidant analysis: (49) butylated hydroxytoluene; (50) trolox; (51) quercetine; and (52) ascorbic acid.
Foods 12 02275 g006
Figure 7. Terpenoid antibacterial compounds: (53) α-himachalene; (54) eremophilene; (55) δ-cadinene; (56) γ-selinene; and (57) 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol.
Figure 7. Terpenoid antibacterial compounds: (53) α-himachalene; (54) eremophilene; (55) δ-cadinene; (56) γ-selinene; and (57) 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol.
Foods 12 02275 g007
Table 1. Antioxidant capacity of S. polyanthum.
Table 1. Antioxidant capacity of S. polyanthum.
SolventMethodIC50StandardIC50Reference
MethanolDPPH20.90 µg/mLBHT18.50 µg/mL[127]
FRAP77.55 µg/mLNot detected
DPPH2.82 µg/mL [6]
DPPH44.35 µg/mLTrolox3.09 µg/mL[128]
ABTS17.69 µg/mL4.11 µg/mL
DPPH77.06 mg TEAC/g [129]
FRAP7.92 mg TEAC/g
ABTS83.19 mg TEAC/g
EthanolDPPH10.89 µg/mLQuercetin5.24 µg/mL[130]
FRAP27.76 mmol/g27.03 mmol/g
ChloroformDPPH0.029 mg/mLQuercetin0.0080 mg/mL[131]
ABTS1.91 mmol TEAC
Petroleum etherDPPH0.023 mg/mLQuercetin0.0080 mg/mL[131]
ABTS0.32 mmol TEAC
HexaneDPPH3121.73 µg/mLAscorbic acid693.30 µg/mL[132]
Ethyl acetateDPPH73.15 µg/mLAscorbic acid3.94 µg/mL[132]
Essential oilDPPH2.08 µg/mLAscorbic acid3.73 µg/mL[109]
FRAP3.28 µg/mL10.24 µg/mL
Table 2. Antimicrobial capacity of S. polyanthum.
Table 2. Antimicrobial capacity of S. polyanthum.
SourceMicrobialMICMBC/MFCReference
Methanol extractC. botulinum>5000 mg/L-[153]
Bacillus cereus0.31 mg/mL2.50 mg/mL[154]
Bacillus subtilis0.63 mg/mL2.50 mg/mL
S. aureus6.25 mg/mL-[155]
S. pyogenes6.25 mg/mL-
Methicillin-resistant6.25 mg/mL-
K. pneumiae6.25 mg/mL-
E. coli12.15 mg/mL-
C. albicans1.25 µg/mL1.25 µg/mL[156]
Ethanol extractShigella dysenteriae20% b/v20% b/v[157]
E.coli1.25 mg/L2.50 mg/L[158]
K. pneumoniae1.25 mg/L2.50 mg/L
S. aureus0.63 mg/L1.25 mg/L
S. typhimurium1.25 mg/L1.25 mg/L
S. typhimurium0.63 mg/L0.63 mg/L
C. albicans0.16% w/v0.16% w/v[159]
Water extractS. mutans 30 mg/mL[160]
Essential oilsB. subtilis31.25 µg/mL-[161]
E. coli>1000 µg/mL-
S. aureus>1000 µg/mL-
S. typhimurium>1000 µg/mL-
V. cholera>1000 µg/mL-
Table 3. The impact of S. polyanthum as an antioxidant food preservative on a variety of foods and observation techniques.
Table 3. The impact of S. polyanthum as an antioxidant food preservative on a variety of foods and observation techniques.
FoodPreservativeMethodsConclusionsReferences
Sargassum teaSimplisiaWater infusionThe addition of S. polyanthum contributed to a reduction in IC50 concentration. IC50 measurements were carried out using the ABTS method. [183]
Salted eggSimplisiaWater infusionThe concentration of antioxidant IC50 reduced from 89.92 to 88.58 mg/g after soaking salted egg at varying concentrations 0–10%. S. polyanthum addition. [184]
PorkSimplisiaWater infusionThere is a significant color difference between pork immersed in 0 and 10% S. polyanthum leaf. After soaking S. polyanthum for 6 h, significant differences were also observed. Another significant difference between the control and 5% S. polyanthum immersion was the difference in meat texture.[185]
BeefSimplisiaWater infusionVarious concentrations until 15% of S. polyanthum leaf infusion had significant effects on the odor, color, texture, shelf life at room temperature, pH, and water content of Bali beef but had no significant effect on the beef’s ability to retain water.[186]
Beef sausageExtractExtract additionS. polyanthum possesses antioxidative properties and could be utilized as a natural antioxidant to prevent lipid oxidation and oily food products. The addition of S. polyanthum at a concentration of 1.50 ppm inhibits oxidative damage in beef sausages.[187]
Bulk cooking oil ExtractExtract additionThe addition of the ethyl acetate fraction lowered the peroxide values. The addition of 1.0% S. polyanthum lowered the peroxide value of bulk cooking oil from 7.75 to 5.04 meq O2/kg. Using 0.2% TBHQ as a control, the peroxide value of bulk cooking oil was reduced to 4.14 meq O2/kg.[188]
Bulk cooking oilExtractExtract additionThe optimal amount of S. polyanthum extract added to cooking oil is 0.8%. The addition of S. polyanthum altered the iodine value and acid value from 42.9 to 48.2 g I2/100 mL and from 0.42 to 0.34 KOH/g, respectively. As 0.2% TBHQ was added as a control, the iodine value and acid value changed to 48.7 g I2/100 mL and 0.19 KOH/g.[189]
MeatExtractExtract additionThe tested extracts were methanol, methanol–water, and water. Using the TBARS technique, the addition of 3% S. polyanthum extract to raw and cooked meat inhibited fat oxidation. The meat samples were stored at 4 °C for seven days prior to testing. Based on the results of the tests, it was determined that the best extract to inhibit fat oxidation in meat was water extract. The lipid protections of water extract on raw meat and cooked meat are up to 58 and 68%, respectively.[190]
Salted eggExtractExtract additionThe concentration of extract addition on salted egg duck media is 25 and 50%. The antioxidant capacity of standard salted eggs, 25% extract addition and 50% extract, were measured to be 4.45, 30.85, and 44.32%. The quality of salted eggs is similar to that of standard salted eggs, despite an increase in albumin index and Haugh unit values to 0.053–0.060 and 44–47, respectively.[191]
Jelly candyExtractExtract additionS. polyanthum extract addition decreases jelly oxidation by up to 50%. Experiments are held for up to 12 days of storage. [192]
Table 4. The impact of S. polyanthum as an antimicrobial food preservative on a variety of foods and observation techniques.
Table 4. The impact of S. polyanthum as an antimicrobial food preservative on a variety of foods and observation techniques.
FoodPreservativeMethodsConclusionsReferences
Chicken meatSimpliciaWater infusionSoaking and storage time had no effect on the physical characteristics of chicken meat, but it could reduce the color value of raw meat while increasing the aroma value, as well as the tenderness and aroma of cooked meat. Soaking chicken meat in S. polyanthum leaf infusion with varying storage times can increase tenderness and inhibit microbial growth until the fourth day. However, S. polyanthum leaf infusion had no effect on the pH or cooking loss of chicken meat. S. polyanthum infusion can reduce the total number of microbes in chicken meat during refrigerator storage.[195]
Chicken meatExtractWater infusionVariations in the concentration of S. polyanthum leaf infusion and the length of observation at room temperature had a substantial impact on the total number of bacteria in fresh chicken meat.[196]
Chicken meatSimpliciaWater infusionAt the optimal concentration of 10%, S. polyanthum leaf infusion can inhibit bacteria growth on chicken meat during storage, extending its shelf life by up to three days at 3–7 °C.[197]
Shrimp and chickenExtractDilutionChicken and shrimp were treated with S. polyanthum leaf extract at various concentrations, 0.0, 0.1, and 1.00%, and exposure periods of 5 and 10 min. In untreated chicken samples, S. aureus TPC values were determined to be 6.66 and 8.66 CFU/mL. In untreated shrimp samples, S. aureus TPC values were determined to be and 7.25 and 6.54 CFU/mL. However, neither sample contained E. coli, Salmonella spp., or Vibrio cholerae. The number of S. aureus TPCs in chicken meat and shrimp began to decrease significantly after 5 min of exposure to S. polyanthum leaf extract at a concentration of 0.01%. There were no statistically significant differences between exposure times. TPC was reduced from 6.66 to 0.00 CFU/mL and from 8.66 to 4.88 CFU/mL in shrimp, whereas TPC S. aureus was reduced from 7.25 to 3.88 CFU/mL and from 6.54 to 4.92 CFU/mL in chicken and shrimp, respectively, following treatment with 1.0% extract for 10 min. [198]
Tilapian fishExtractExtract additionUsing 15% S. polyanthum extract and storing for seven days was able to maintain the number of bacterial colonies below the national regulator requirement.[199]
Dug eggsSimpliciaWater infusionUsing 5% (v/v) S. polyanthum addition to salted duck eggs can inhibit Proteus mirabilis growth significantly. It is shown by the total plate number decreasing. [200]
TofuEssential oilWater infusionEssential oil is added to tofu bacterial growth media. Essential oil concentrations are 0.063, 0.313, and 1.563 mg/mL. Tofu and bacteria are incubated for 2, 4, 6, and 8 days. Bacterial growth is monitored visually. Preservation of essential oil is equal to its concentration. Essential oil optimally preserved tofu in 6-day incubation.[161]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Julizan, N.; Ishmayana, S.; Zainuddin, A.; Van Hung, P.; Kurnia, D. Potential of Syzygnium polyanthum as Natural Food Preservative: A Review. Foods 2023, 12, 2275. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12122275

AMA Style

Julizan N, Ishmayana S, Zainuddin A, Van Hung P, Kurnia D. Potential of Syzygnium polyanthum as Natural Food Preservative: A Review. Foods. 2023; 12(12):2275. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12122275

Chicago/Turabian Style

Julizan, Nur, Safri Ishmayana, Achmad Zainuddin, Pham Van Hung, and Dikdik Kurnia. 2023. "Potential of Syzygnium polyanthum as Natural Food Preservative: A Review" Foods 12, no. 12: 2275. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12122275

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop