Next Article in Journal
A Method for Screening Proteases That Can Specifically Hydrolyze the Epitope AA83-105 of αs1-Casein Allergen
Previous Article in Journal
Bioaccessibility of Phenolic Compounds from Mistletoe Infusions and Effect of In Vitro Digestion on Its Antioxidant and Pancreatic Lipase Inhibitory Activity
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Chestnut Starch Nanocrystal Combined with Macadamia Protein Isolate to Stabilize Pickering Emulsions with Different Oils

Foods 2022, 11(21), 3320; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11213320
by Jingyi Zheng 1, Lei Zhao 2,*, Junjie Yi 1, Linyan Zhou 1 and Shengbao Cai 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Foods 2022, 11(21), 3320; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11213320
Submission received: 20 September 2022 / Revised: 10 October 2022 / Accepted: 19 October 2022 / Published: 23 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Food Physics and (Bio)Chemistry)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The article „Chestnut starch nanocrystal combined with macadamia protein isolate to stabilize Pickering emulsions with different oils“ is a reserach article focused on a preparation of o/w emulsions stabilized by Pickering particles with an additional value.

 Generally, the scientific work is well described. I suggest some minor changes in the manuscript.

 line 59 – I recommend that you consider adding information about quercetin (and why quercetin?) – e.g. nutritional value

line 61 – Materials – add an origin of the used quercetin

line 92 – neutral ...pH? ...I would be also useful to specify the certain value

Author Response

TO: Editor and Reviewers

Thank you for your suggestions, which are great and helpful to us. We had revised the manuscript thoroughly according to your advice, and some points which we do not change will be justified by some reasons.

Thank you very much!

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The results are clearly presented and interconnected in a logical manner, carefully interpreted. In my opinion this is very good scientific paper and I recommend addressing the following minor remarks.

- The author state about protein content of  21% in macadamia protein isolate , which is rather low protein content. Did the authors try to increase the value by modifying the extraction process?

- The discussion on SEM images is rather speculative since the pictures given there do not clearly support the statements. However, this analysis is not decisive for the study, so in my opinion the it can be removed.

-  I recommend authors to emphasize the novelty of this work, in sense that this this blend made of starch and protein from exotic sources have never been investigated before for emulsifying properties.

Author Response

TO: Editor and Reviewers

Thank you for your suggestions, which are great and helpful to us. We had revised the manuscript thoroughly according to your advice, and some points which we do not change will be justified by some reasons.

Thank you very much!

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Some considerations will be made to the authors in order to improve or clarify the article:

1 – Pickering emulsions are emulsions stabilized with solid particles. The authors report that macadamia protein isolate (MPI) is a promising natural emulsifier due to its amphiphilic properties – line 41. The main question is: if the MPI have emulsifier properties, what is the difference to the conventional emulsifiers?

2 – Line 114 – In mixture was achieved using an ultraturrax. Was temperature considered?

3 – Line 169 – Show the refractive index of the emulsion.

4 – Figure 4 – To facilitate the interpretation of figure 4, a legend in each column is recommended to understand the main difference.

5 – Line 399 - It is not perceptively that particles are at the boundary of the oil droplets. Additionally, if the authors use the same dyes to dye the emulsion, why do the Pickering droplets have different colors after acquisition?

6 – Miscellaneous – Added end point in line: 325, 327, 332.

Author Response

TO: Editor and Reviewers

Thank you for your suggestions, which are great and helpful to us. We had revised the manuscript thoroughly according to your advice, and some points which we do not change will be justified by some reasons.

Thank you very much!

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop