Next Article in Journal
Consumer Behaviour and Attitude towards the Purchase of Organic Products in Riobamba, Ecuador
Next Article in Special Issue
Purification of Camellia Oil by Inorganic Ceramic Membrane
Previous Article in Journal
Current Sex Distribution of Cooking and Food Shopping Responsibilities in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparison of the Effects of High Hydrostatic Pressure and Pasteurization on Quality of Milk during Storage
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Pulsed Light Application for Campylobacter Control on Poultry Meat and Its Effect on Colour and Volatile Profile

Foods 2022, 11(18), 2848; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11182848
by Esther Baptista 1, Ana Borges 1, Teresa Aymerich 2, Susana P. Alves 1, Luís Telo da Gama 1, Helena Fernandes 1, Maria José Fernandes 1 and Maria João Fraqueza 1,*
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Foods 2022, 11(18), 2848; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11182848
Submission received: 16 August 2022 / Revised: 2 September 2022 / Accepted: 8 September 2022 / Published: 14 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Emerging Nonthermal Technologies in the Food Industry)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The cause of spoilage of meat products is the presence of psychrophilic bacteria, mold and yeast fungi. Works related to the reduction of contamination of meat products are relevant. This paper describes the methodology of decontamination of the surface of meat products using pulsed light. 

The article is competently written and well structured. The introduction outlines the basic information about the pathogenic bacteria and the method of inactivation. The technology of light pulsation is described. The methodology of the experiments clearly shows the whole process of research. The results of the research are consistently and logically described. The data are presented in both tabular and graphical form. The conclusion is compact and clearly stated.

 

Overall, there are some questions about the study:

1. Are the meat samples with or without chicken skin?

2. How was the light penetration rate measured?

 

Author Response

Response to reviewer 1

 

The cause of spoilage of meat products is the presence of psychrophilic bacteria, mold and yeast fungi. Works related to the reduction of contamination of meat products are relevant. This paper describes the methodology of decontamination of the surface of meat products using pulsed light. 

The article is competently written and well structured. The introduction outlines the basic information about the pathogenic bacteria and the method of inactivation. The technology of light pulsation is described. The methodology of the experiments clearly shows the whole process of research. The results of the research are consistently and logically described. The data are presented in both tabular and graphical form. The conclusion is compact and clearly stated.

 Response: The author thanks all comments of the reviewer.

Overall, there are some questions about the study:

  1. Are the meat samples with or without chicken skin?

Response: The chicken breast was sliced and without skin as stated in lines 106-107. The information was added to the text.

  1. How was the light penetration rate measured?

Response: The light penetration rate was not measured, only the temperature and the light radiant energy that is received on samples surfaces per unit area expressed by J/cm2 as described on lines 141-142.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments to the Author:

The manuscript's title is appropriate.
Abstract: The Background of the abstract is missing. The main procedure and findings of the study could be improved. In the last sentence of the abstract, it is recommended to give a suggestion for the future.
Introduction: A brief survey of existing literature, purpose, importance, and innovation of the research is well mentioned.
Please see the attached file for comments. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Response to reviewer 2

The manuscript's title is appropriate.
Abstract: The Background of the abstract is missing. The main procedure and findings of the study could be improved. In the last sentence of the abstract, it is recommended to give a suggestion for the future.
Introduction: A brief survey of existing literature, purpose, importance, and innovation of the research is well mentioned.
Please see the attached file for comments. 

Response: the authors thanks reviewer comments that improved this paper. The abstract was improved according to reviewer suggestions.

Numbers should be separated from the following word by a space.

Response: the correction was done

 

To simplify the expression not able, consider replacing it by unable

Response: The correction was done

 

which type of chemical decontamination?

Response: Examples were added such as lactic acid, chlorine dioxide, acidified sodium chlorite and trisodium phosphate

 

please cite the source.

Response: Reference was added

 

Updated references for each technology could be used here. For instance;

https://doi.org/10.1111/jfs.12467

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108172

https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12977

https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.15499

Response: The references suggested and related with poultry decontamination was added.

 

doses range? write complete experimental parameter.

Response: The information was added.

correct the SI unit

Response: the correction was done

 

also mention the ranges of distance and treatment time.

Response: The information was added.

 

0.90 and 1.82 for Salmonella and ...?

Response: the sentence was completed regarding the lean surface thighs

 

Numbers should be separated from the following word by a space.

Response: the correction was done

 

Numbers should be separated from the following word by a space.

Response: the correction was done

 

 

replace "counts" with "count"

Response: the correction was done

 

To simplify the expression was equipped with, consider replacing it by had

Response: the correction was done

 

add space before unit

Response: the correction was done

 

Consider omitting the expression "it seems that" to lighten this sentence

Response: the correction was done

 

was or were?

Response: the correction was done

 

 

on which experimental parameters (voltage, distance, time, etc.?

Response: The information was added.

 

The verb decrease should be in the base form when it follows a modal auxiliary such as

Response: the correction was done

 

 

with same processing parameters as yours?

Response: the information was added

 

There are usually no spaces around a slash

Response: the correction was done

 

 

replace "are" with "is"

Response: the correction was done

 

which time?

Response: the information was added

 

how much reduced?

Response: the information was added

 

how much increase?

Response: the information was added

 

how much reduction ?

Response: the information was added

 

 

what do you mean by this phrase?

Response: Consumers when buying the meat “at purchase moment”, the main cue that influence its attitude it is the color of the meat (Araújo et al., 2022). A Reference was added.

 

 

I wonder how the color was not affected (specially L*) even the temperature was increased during the high processing parameters?

Response: The meat became slightly lighter (slightly increase of L* but without statistical significance. The increase of temperature was not more than 2.5ºC to 10ºC so it could not affect deeply the conformation of proteins and increase the reflection of light.

 

 

insert comma after "however"

Response: the correction was done

 

Consider omitting the expression "amount of" to lighten this sentence

Response: the correction was done

 

replace "were" with "was"

Response: the correction was done

 

add author name.

Response: the information was added

 

by..?

Response: the author was added

 

"prooxidant" to "pro-oxidant"

Response: the correction was done

 

The subject "it" is missing

Response: the correction was done

 

remove comma

Response: the correction was done

 

remove comma

Response: the correction was done

 

 

Back to TopTop