Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Nutritional Quality and Sensory Parameters of Meat from Mallard and Four Species of Wild Goose
Previous Article in Journal
Development of a Tailored Sol-Gel Immobilized Biocatalyst for Sustainable Synthesis of the Food Aroma Ester n-Amyl Caproate in Continuous Solventless System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Metataxonomic Mapping of the Microbial Diversity of Irish and Eastern Mediterranean Cheeses

1
APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, T12 YT20 Cork, Ireland
2
School of Microbiology, University College Cork, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland
3
Department of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science, Cyprus University of Technology, Lemesos 3036, Cyprus
4
Department of Biosciences, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co., P61 C996 Cork, Ireland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(16), 2483; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11162483
Submission received: 6 July 2022 / Revised: 29 July 2022 / Accepted: 3 August 2022 / Published: 17 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Dairy)

Abstract

:
The distinct sensorial characteristics of local cheeses influence consumer preferences, and make an essential contribution to the local economy. Microbial diversity in cheese is among the fundamental contributors to sensorial and qualitative characteristics. However, knowledge regarding the existence of microbial patterns associated with regional production practices in ripened cheeses remains limited. The present research was conducted to test the hypothesis that the background metagenome of cheeses could be used as a marker of their origin. We compared Irish versus Eastern Mediterranean cheeses—namely Greek and Cypriot—using High Throughput Sequencing (HTS). The study identified a significantly distinct separation among cheeses originating from the three different countries, in terms of the total microbial community composition. The use of machine learning and biomarkers discovery algorithms defined key microbes that differentiate each geographic region. Finally, the development of interaction networks revealed that the key species developed mostly negative interactions with the other members of the communities, highlighting their dominance in the community. The findings of the present research demonstrate that metagenome could indeed be used as a biological marker of the origin of mature cheeses, and could provide further insight into the dynamics of microbial community composition in ripened cheeses.

1. Introduction

The dairy industry is an essential contributor to the Irish and East Mediterranean economies, with cheese production being a principal part of the regional gastronomical cultures. The unique sensorial characteristics of regional cheeses arise from a combination of factors, including: (1) the type of milk used in cheese production; (2) cheese manufacturing practices, such as the addition of natural whey or starter cultures, salt, herbs or other ingredients; (3) whether the milk is raw or pasteurized and (4) the degree of ripening [1,2]. During cheese ripening, complex and dynamic interactions take place among the members of the microbial community. The specific microbial patterns that are developed as a result of these interactions influence the taste and flavor, and affect the quality of the final product [3]. The use of pasteurized milk and defined starter cultures simplifies the composition and the dynamics of the microbial communities. Nevertheless, the microbial associations and the effect produced by the community metabolites on cheese texture, flavor, aroma and other qualitative characteristics remain puzzling. Despite the fact that several factors contribute to microbial diversity shaping, the existence of region-associated microbial signatures has been revealed by recent metataxonomic sequencing studies [4,5].
The advent of High Throughput Sequencing (HTS) technologies has remarkably improved our understanding of the role that microbial consortia play in the process of cheese ripening [1,6,7]. The composition of the bacterial communities is comprised of the following: the dominants [the lactic acid bacteria (LAB)], which are the most successful fermenters of the configured microenvironment; the subdominants, which are the survivors of the selective pressure of the dominants, and exist in lower relative abundance; and the very low abundant species, the presence of which is attributed to environmental contamination [8]. The metabolic activity of specific LAB, including Lactococcus lactis and Streptococcus thermophilus, to successfully ferment lactose, favors their use as starter cultures to guide the process of fermentation, and to affect cheese microbiome shaping and sensorial characteristic development [9]. However, during the process of ripening, the microbiota can become dominated by Non-Starter Lactic Acid Bacteria (NSLAB) [8]. These species contain increased proteolytic and lipolyticactivities. Their ability to utilize other carbon sources besides lactose results in different flavors and textures in cheeses. Apart from LAB, cheese microbiota can be comprised of spoilage microorganisms and pathogens, including the genera Clostridium, Staphylococcus, Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, and other Proteobacteria. Moreover, yeast including Candida spp., Debaryomyces hansenii, Yarrowia lipolytica, and Kluyveromyces lactis, as well as molds including Aspergillus, Geotrichum, Penicillium, Fusarium, and Mucor are found among cheese microbial consortia [10].
Cheese spoilage and foodborne infections constitute major challenges for the cheese industry and cheese producers, and are of great concern for consumers [11]. Cheese storage under refrigeration conditions favors the development of psychrotrophic bacteria, including Pseudomonas spp., Acinetobacter spp., Bacillus spp., and Enterobacteriaceae [12,13], which can release great amounts of extracellular heat-stable hydrolytic enzymes [14]. Their production results in spoilage, and degradation of the quality of cheese, by creating rancid, or bitter flavors. Proteases break down casein, leading to bitterness in milk, gel formation of UHT-sterilized milk, and reduction of the amount of soft cheese [15]. Lipases degrade triglycerides to glycerol and free fatty acids, producing off-flavors [16]. Moreover, lecithinases lead to the disruption of milk lipid globule membranes, enhancing the catalytic activity of lipases [16]. Elevation of the pH > 5.0 during cheese ripening supports the growth of coliforms, which can produce acid and gas [17]. Heterofermentative LAB, including Lactobacillus and Leuconostoc secrete gas and off-flavors, promoting cheese spoilage [18]. Fungi produce a plethora of secondary metabolites, and some of these, such as off-odors and flavors, have a negative influence on the organoleptic characteristics of mature cheese [19].
In the present study, metataxonomic sequencing analysis was applied to characterize the microbial communities of mature Irish and eastern Mediterranean cheeses, and to map the microbial signatures associated with each region. Considering that several factors affect cheeses’ microbial diversity composition, our goal was to identify the key biomarkers associated with each geographic location, and to reveal critical interactions among the members of the communities. Our findings may enhance existing knowledge of the microbial community dynamics of ripened cheeses, and benefit local cheese producers by supporting the improvement of product quality.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

Cheeses were collected between March and May 2021, and included 16 mature cheeses from the Cork (Ireland) market, 10 from markets and producers in Cyprus, 10 from Crete (Greece), 10 from Mytillini (Greece), and 3 from Limnos (Greece) (Figure 1, Table 1). Cypriot and Greek cheeses were placed in cool boxes, and transported to University College, Cork within 3 working days, whereas Irish cheeses were transferred immediately to University College, Cork. Samples were stored at −20 °C until processing.

2.2. Metagenomic DNA Extraction

For sample homogenization, 5 g of cheese (only the core, not the rind) were mixed with 45 mL of 2% tri-sodium citrate (Honeywell, Europe) using a Stomacher 400 Circulator (Seward, UK) at 300 rpm for 2 minutes. After centrifugation at 16,000× g for 5 min at 4 °C, the top fat layer was removed using sterile cotton swabs, the supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was used for DNA extraction. Microbial DNA extraction was performed using DNeasy® PowerFood® Microbial Kit (MoBio Laboratories Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with the following modification: after the addition of 450 µL Solution MBL during the cell lysis step, the samples were incubated for 10 min at 65 °C, and for an additional 10 min at 95 °C. The extracted DNA was stored at −20 °C until processing.

2.3. Quantification of Total DNA

The total DNA isolated from the cheese samples was quantified fluorometrically with Qubit 4.0 fluorometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), using Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Invitrogen). The purity of the DNA was evaluated by measuring the ratios of absorbance, A260/280 nm and A260/230 nm, using a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA).

2.4. Barcoded Illumina MiSeq Amplicon Sequencing of Bacterial 16s rRNA Gene and of Fungal ITS Region

The 16S rRNA bacterial gene amplification, the Illumina paired-completion library preparation, and sequencing were performed as described previously [20]. The 16S rRNA bacterial gene was amplified using the primers V3: 5′-TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG-3′ and V4: 5′-GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG-3′, whereas the fungal internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) locus was amplified using the primers BITS (5′-NNNNNNNNCTACCTGCGGARGGATCA-3′) and B58S3 (5′-GAGATCCRTTGYTRAAAGTT-3′), with the addition of the overhang adapter sequence, according to Bokulich and colleagues [21]. The fungal ITS1 locus amplification and sequencing, PCR amplicon purification, evaluation of DNA quantity and quality, and amplicon normalization were also conducted as described previously [22,23]. For the sequencing run, both the bacterial 16S rRNA gene and the ITS1 loci libraries were loaded on MiSeq 600 cycle Reagent Kit v3 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) (5% PhiX) and run on a MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform.

2.5. Microbiome and Statistical Analysis

Raw fastq sequences were quality filtered, and Qiime 2 version 2020.2 was used to calculate the diversity indexes Shannon, Simpson, and Chao1, regarding alpha diversity; unweighted [24] and weighted [25] uniFrac distances, regarding beta diversity; and observed OTU diversity metrics [26], as previously described [27]. Samples were rarefied at 15,637 for bacteria and 19,145 for fungi. To visualize the distinction of the microbial communities into clusters based on Unweighted UniFrac distances, Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) was performed using q2-diversity after the samples were rarefied (subsampled without replacement) with 25 sampling depths. The significance among Irish, Greek, and Cypriot cheeses was tested with PERMANOVA [28] in Qiime 2 with 999 permutations (Least Significant Difference (LSD) p ≤ 0.05). Taxonomy assignment for 16S rDNA sequences into OTUs was based on the q2-feature-classifier [29] against the Greengenes 13_8 99% OTUs reference sequences [30], whereas for fungal ITS loci the UNITE fungal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) database (9_12 release) [31] was applied. Sequence filtering was applied to remove taxonomies with unsuccessful identification to phylum level. Cheeses with more than 60% of unidentified genera, including C10, I1, and I16 for fungi, were excluded from downstream analysis. To discover biomarkers for different origin cheeses, the LEfSe algorithm was used [32], as described previously [28]. Machine learning was applied in the q2-sample-classifier, using the Random Forest algorithm in Qiime2, as described by Bokulich and colleagues [33], and Pedregosa and colleagues [34]. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, Per-Class Receiver Operating Characteristics (PCROC), area under the curve (AUC), feature importance scores, and an abundance heatmap representing the most important features in each sample/group were created as part of the q2-sample-classifier pipeline (using default parameters). Calculation of AUC was performed using scikit-learn [34] for each class, and micro- and macro-averages. Micro-average was evaluated throughout every sample, and influenced by class imbalances. Macro-average evaluates equally the classification of every sample, diminishing the effect of class imbalances on the average AUC. Strong (r > 0.6 or r < −0.6) and significant (p < 0.01) correlations between the identified microbial taxa from all cheese samples were evaluated using Pearson and Spearman correlations and dissimilarities using Bray Curtis and Kullback–Leibler matrices in CoNet [35], and a co-occurrence network was created using Cytoscape 3.2.1 [36]. Taxa with sum relative abundances less than <0.01% [37] appeared in less than 20% [38].
All raw sequence data in read-pairs format were deposited in the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the Bioproject PRJNA838921.

3. Results

3.1. Abundance and Alpha Diversity of the Cheese Microbiota

Mature cheese samples collected from Ireland, Greece, and Cyprus were each analyzed for their bacterial and fungal diversities. To estimate the bacterial diversity of cheeses, 48 examined samples were sequenced to generate 1,840,004 high-quality sequencing reads, with an average of 38,333.42 sequencing reads per sample (range = 15,637–125,662, STD = 21,614.82; Supplementary Table S1). High-quality sequences were grouped into the average number of 57 OTUs (range = 24–108, SD = 21; Supplementary Table S1). To evaluate the fungal diversity of mature cheeses, 49 examined samples were used as input to the Illumina MiSeq to produce 4,401,335 high-quality sequencing reads, with an average of 89,823.16 sequencing reads per sample (range = 12,493–337,284, STD = 84,393.48; Supplementary Table S2). High-quality sequences were grouped into an average of 82.79 OTUs (range = 12–256, SD = 50.4; Supplementary Table S2). Shannon, Simpson, and Chao1 estimators are shown in Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 for bacterial and fungal diversities, respectively.
Initially, we evaluated the microbial alpha diversity based on the Shannon, Simpson, and Chao1 estimators. Regarding the bacterial alpha diversity, a significant difference (p = 0.002) was observed between the Irish and Greek cheeses, based on the Chao1 index, using the Kruskal–Wallis test. The Cypriot cheeses indicated higher fungal alpha diversity, but the difference was not significant based on the Kruskal–Wallis test (Figure 2B, Supplementary Table S3). No other significant difference was observed in the microbial alpha diversity among the cheeses from the three countries.

3.2. Microbial Beta Biodiversity among the Different Regions

Beta-diversity analysis using an Unweighted/Weighted Unifrac metric was performed, to qualitatively estimate the presence of distinct microbial patterns among cheeses produced in Ireland, Greece, and Cyprus. Both the bacterial and fungal diversities of the Irish cheeses were grouped separately from the Greek and Cypriot cheeses on the PCoA plot (Figure 3A,C (data presented by country), Figure 3B,D (data presented by town/island)). Regarding the bacterial diversity, the PERMANOVA test indicated a significant difference between Irish and Greek, and Irish and Cypriot cheeses (p < 0.05; Supplementary Table S4), based on both the Unweighted and the Weighted Unifrac metrices. A significant difference in the fungal beta diversity of the cheeses was observed among all three countries (p < 0.05; Supplementary Table S4), based on the Unweighted Unifrac metric, but only between cheeses from Ireland and Greece based on the Weighted Unifrac metric.

3.3. Taxonomic Composition of Microbial Communities

In general, the dominant bacterial genera in analyzed cheeses were Lactococcus, Streptococcus, and Lactobacillus (Figure 4A,B). All Irish cheeses, except for two produced from raw milk, were dominated by Lactococcus. Greek cheeses were mostly dominated by Streptococcus sp. and Lactobacillus spp., and a few by members of the genus Lactococcus. Streptococcus, followed by Lactobacillus, were the predominant genera in all Cypriot cheeses. Greek and Cypriot cheeses were characterized by increased relative representation of the species Lactobacillus helveticus. These species were also detected in some Irish cheeses. Mostly Cypriot cheeses showed increased relative representation of the species Lactobacillus delbrueckii. Some cheeses from all countries indicated increased relative abundance of the species Lactobacillus zeae and Lactobacillus brevis. Apart from the aforementioned LAB, some cheeses indicated increased relative representation of the genus Leuconostoc, and some cheeses of the species L. mesenteroides, but in lower relative abundance.
Regarding the lower relative abundance bacteria, the spoilage family Enterobacteriaceae and the genus Staphylococcus were detected. However, three cheeses from Ireland indicated increased relative abundance (5%, 9%, and 33%) of Staphylococcus species, including S. equorum. Additionally, some Greek cheeses, mostly from Crete and Limnos, had increased relative representation of the species S. equi. Some Irish cheeses were characterized by the presence of members of the families Micrococcaceae and Peptostreptococcaceae, of the genera Psychrobacter, and Sphingomonas, represented by the species S. yabuuchiae, and of the species Vibrio rumoiensis. Greek cheeses showed low relative abundances of the families Bifidobacteriaceae and Weeksellaceae, including Wautersiella that were detected in cheeses from Mytillini, but were also characterized by members of the genera Enterococcus, Acinetobacter, Kocuria, and Macrococcus, and of the species Kurthia gibsonii. Regarding the genus Acinetobacter, the most commonly detected species included A. johnsonii and A. rhizosphaerae. The species A. guillouiae was detected only in cheeses from Mytillini. Cheeses from Mytillini were also characterized by the family Bacillaceae, by the genus Fructobacillus, and by the species Corynebacterium variabile. Two cheeses from Crete indicated the presence of the species Clostridium perfringens, a species which is known to cause food poisoning [39]. Cypriot cheeses showed the presence of the contaminant Mycoplasma, with three cheeses having relative representations of 2.8%, 5.5%, and 9.4%. Moreover, the analysis revealed the co-occurrence of some bacterial taxa in low relative abundances in cheeses from Greece and Cyprus. Specifically, cheeses from both countries had representatives of the species Pseudomonas, Chryseobacterium, Enhydrobacter, and Pediococcus. Pseudomonas was also detected in an Irish cheese. Pediococcus characterized mostly cheeses from Crete. Cheeses from Cyprus and Crete also showed the presence of Chromohalobacter.
The fungal diversity of all the analyzed mature cheeses, according to ITS1 loci sequencing, was dominated by members of the order Saccharomycetales and, in lower relative abundances, of the order Eurotiales of the phylum Ascomycota. Some cheeses had representatives of the orders Mucorales, Capnodiales, Trichosporonales, Hypocreales, and Pleosporales. The most abundant families were Debaryomycetaceae, Aspergillaceae, Saccharomycetaceae, and Saccharomycodaceae, and in lesser amounts, Mucoraceae, Cladosporiaceae, and Trichosporonaceae. The common and abundant identified fungal genera in most analyzed cheeses were: Debaryomyces, represented by the species D. hansenii; Penicillium, represented by the species P. carneum; and P. commune, and Candida, represented mostly by the species C. zeylanoides, C. parapsilosis, and C. inconspicua (Figure 5A,B). Specifically, the species P. carneum was predominant in the Irish cheeses I2 and I9, in which P. roquefortii was used as a starter, indicating that these species might have been misidentified due to sequence similarities. The genus Kluyveromyces was also predominant in Greek and Cypriot cheeses, represented by the species K. marxianus and K. lactis.
Members of the genera Saccharomyces, such as S. paradoxus, Aspergillus, such as A. westerdijkiae, and Trichosporon, such as T. asahii, represented the lower abundant species in most analyzed samples. Some cheeses were characterized by the presence of the genera Issatchenkia, such as I. orientalis, Kazachstania, Torulaspora, Yamadazyma, Malassezia, and Rhodotorula. The species Cutaneotrichosporon curvatus was detected in very low relative abundance (>1%) in many cheeses, apart from cheeses from Crete that were detected in relative abundance from 1–6,5%. Greek and Cyprus cheeses had representatives of the genera Hanseniaspora, such as H. nectarophila and H. guilliermondii, Alternaria, such as A. alternata, Aureobasidium, such as A. pullulans, Meyerozyma, Stemphylium, Botrytis, Mycosphaerella, Wickerhamomyces, and Sporobolomyces. The species Parengyodontium album and Erysiphe necator were detected in cheeses from Limnos and Mytillini, and one Cypriot cheese. Moreover, the genus Dipodascus was detected in cheeses from Ireland and Greece, but not from Cyprus. Finally, members of the genera Mycena and Dekkera were detected only in cheeses from Cyprus, and the species Candida glaebosa only in Irish cheeses. Notably, a high percentage of the ITS1 loci raw reads could not be classified at the genus level.

3.4. Identification of Microbial Biomarkers

To evaluate whether the values of the identified relative abundances of microbial taxa were differentially distributed among the cheeses from the three countries, we applied the LEfSe algorithm. The analysis revealed that species of the detected bacterial biomarkers are applied by the industry as starter cultures (Figure 6). Specifically, Irish cheeses had a significantly increased relative representation of members of the genus Lactococcus compared to cheeses from Cyprus and Greece (Figure 6A). Greek cheeses indicated a significantly more abundant representation of the genus Streptococcus, and in cheeses from Cyprus of the species L. delbrueckii. Apart from LAB, cheeses from Greece had significantly increased representation of the genera Staphylococcus, Chryseobacterium, and Enhydrobacter.
Regarding fungi, Irish cheeses had increased representation of the species Penicillium carneum and Candida glaebosa (Figure 6B). Greek cheeses indicated increased relative representation of the genera Botrytis and Filobasidium, and of the species Kluyveromyces marxianus, Kluyveromyces lactis, Erysiphe necator, Meyerozyma guilliermondii, Issatchenkia orientalis, Saccharomyces paradoxus, Candida parapsilosis, Leptobacillium leptobactrum, Parengyodontium album, and Trichosporon asahii (Figure 6B, Supplementary Figure S1). Additionally, cheeses from Mytillini were mostly associated with Mycosphaerella tassiana, Limnos cheeses with Aureobasidium pullulans, and Crete cheeses with Cutaneotrichosporon curvatus (Figure S2). Finally, the taxa detected in increased relative abundance in Cypriot cheeses included the genera Pichia and Hanseniaspora, and the species Hanseniaspora guilliermondii, Hanseniaspora nectarophila, Candida stellata, and Malassezia restricta (Figure 6B).

3.5. Differentiation of Cheeses from Each Country with Great Accuracy, Using Random Forests Classifier

A supervised learning Random Forest classifier was trained to predict, using the bacterial 16S rRNA gene and the ITS loci OTU abundance data, the country of origin of each cheese based on the detected microbiota. The results indicated a very high predictive accuracy (average AUC = 1.00 regarding bacteria, and average AUC = 0.98 regarding fungi: Figure 7A,C, respectively), showing that the algorithm could predict the origin of key members of the cheese microbiota with high accuracy. Most of the top 13 predictive features that were identified for the bacteria were in agreement with the results obtained using the LefSe algorithm (Figure 7B). Specifically, Lactococcus differentiated Irish cheeses, Streptococcus and Staphylococcus differentiated Greek cheeses, and L. delbrueckii differentiated Cypriot cheeses. In addition, L. brevis characterized mostly Irish cheeses, Mycoplasma and Leuconostocaceae characterized Cypriot cheeses, and Chryseobacterium, Enhydrobacter, Pseudomonas, and Streptococcus equi characterized Greek cheeses, but with reduced detected frequency.
Similarly, the majority of the top 30 predictive features for fungi corresponded to those identified by the LefSe algorithm biomarkers (Figure 7D). The species D. hansenii, C. glaebosa, and P. carneum differentiated mostly Irish cheeses. The species K. marxianus, K. lactis, S. paradoxus, and I. orientalis distinguished Greek cheeses and, to a lesser degree, the species P. album, A. pullulans, C. parapsilosis, I. orientalis, T. asahii, and C. curvatus. Finally, H. nectarophila differentiated Cyprus cheeses.

3.6. Microbial Network Analysis

To study the correlations between the identified bacterial and fungal taxa for each country, a co-occurrence network was constructed using the CoNet algorithm in Cytoscape, based on the Pearson and Spearman correlations and the Bray Curtis and Kullback–Leibler dissimilarity matrices (Figure 8). The analysis focused on the keystone microbes that were identified as biomarkers strongly associated with each geographic region. In general, the detected and abundant bacterial biomarkers developed negative associations with the other members of the cheese microbiota. Specifically, in Irish cheeses, Lactococcus was negatively associated with Streptococcus, L. zeae, Brevibacterium, C. parapsilosis, and D. hansenii (Supplementary Table S5). Likewise, in Greek cheeses Streptococcus indicated negative associations with Lactococcus (Supplementary Table S6). Additionally, Streptococcus sp. were negatively associated with Lactobacillus, Leuconostoc, P. carneum, and Malassezia globosa. Moreover, L. delbrueckii, the species that differentiated Cypriot cheeses, was negatively correlated with Lactococcus, Pseudomonas, and D. hansenii. However, L. delbrueckii created a co-occurrence network with Streptococcus, Hanseniaspora spp., M. restricta, and Penicillium (Supplementary Table S7).
Apart from Lactococcus, D. hansenii, the predominant fungi in most Irish cheeses was negatively associated with L. helveticus, K. marxianus, P. carneum, C. glaebosa, and C. inconspicua (Supplementary Table S5). Additional negative correlations were observed between K. marxianus and L. brevis, Chromohalobacter, Pseudomonas, D. hansenii, C. stellata, C. magnoliae, M. globosa, H. vineae, L. leptobactrum, and P. album in Greek cheeses (Supplementary Table S6). K. lactis was also negatively associated both with L. brevis; and with some spoilage microbes, including L. mesenteroides, Enterococcus, Klebsiella, Acinetobacter spp., and several other fungi. Finally, in Cypriot cheeses, Hanseniaspora spp. were negatively correlated with Lactococcus, Pseudomonas, and Penicillium spp., and positively correlated with M. restricta and Mycoplasma (Supplementary Table S7).

4. Discussion

Substantial evidence indicates the existence of distinguishable microbial patterns in ripened cheeses originating from different areas and produced using different manufacturing conditions [1,4,40,41]. Apart from the cheese manufacturing environment, factors including the origin of the milk, the addition of starter cultures or natural whey, herbs, salt, and other ingredients, and the processing conditions, such as milk heating or pasteurization, influence the shaping of unique microbial consortia in each type of cheese [1]. In the present study, the microbial diversity of mature Irish and eastern Mediterranean cheeses was analyzed using metataxonomic sequencing, to reveal the presence of common microbial patterns associated with each location. Moreover, we suggest microbial biomarkers related to the three areas, and provide insight into the dynamics of the microbial communities’ compositions.
Initially, we demonstrated that phylogeny-based beta-diversity, as depicted by UniFrac PCoA and confirmed by PERMANOVA test, could separate the microbial diversity of cheeses from the three countries, Ireland, Cyprus and Greece, into different cluster affinities. To further strengthen our results, we used a Random Forest algorithm that predicted, with strong predictive accuracy, the origin of the cheeses based on the microbiota. These findings are in line with similar metataxonomic sequencing-based studies, revealing a microbiological mapping associated with each cheese’s geographical origin and way of production [4,42]. Specifically, cheeses from all countries indicated a significant difference in fungal beta diversity. Additionally, the bacterial diversity of Irish cheeses was significantly distinct from Greek and Cypriot cheeses. Kamimura and colleagues [4] performed a metataxonomic analysis of 11 different types of cheeses originating from five geographical regions of Brazil, and likewise identified microbial signatures associated with the area of production. Bokulich and Mills [42] indicated that washed-rind mature cheeses’ microbial diversity was dominated by environmental microbes found in processing environments. However, Wolfe and colleagues [43] analyzed cheese rind microbial communities from 10 countries, to reveal that the microbial community compositions were mostly associated with abiotic factors, such as moisture, rather than geography, highlighting the effect of the processing conditions on the cheese microbiota formation.
The metataxonomic data, as applied to the Random Forest and the LEfSe biomarkers discovery algorithms, identified distinct microbiological signatures among the cheeses from the three different countries. Specifically, regarding the bacterial community composition, Lactococcus was mostly associated with Irish, Staphylococcus with Greek, and L. delbrueckii with Cypriot cheeses. Notably, the species Lactococcus lactis, L. delbrueckii, and Streptococcus thermophilus, were applied by the industry as starter cultures [44,45,46,47,48]. The predominant presence of Lactococcus sp. in Irish cheese was in agreement with Walsh and colleagues [49], and with Quigley and colleagues [50]. These studies also identified the presence of Leuconostoc, S. thermophilus, L. helveticus, S. equorum, and Psychrobacter in lower relative abundances. Michailidou and colleagues [51] analyzed 6 Greek PDO (Protected Designation of Origin) cheeses from 3 different producers or industries, using amplicon metabarcoding analysis, and found that most cheeses were dominated by species that belonged to the genus Lactococcus, while the rest were co-dominated by Streptococcus spp. and Lactobacillus spp., which was similar to our own findings. However, in our analysis, Streptococcus spp. was predominant in most cheeses. This may have been due to the fact that, apart from Kalathaki Limnou, those cited above were analyzing cheeses originating from locations different to the ones that we analyzed. Moreover, metagenomic analysis of Greek feta PDO cheeses indicated that the microbiota was dominated by the species L. lactis, whereas Streptococcus and Lactobacillus were detected in lower relative abundance [52]. Kamilari and colleagues [20] analyzed the bacterial diversity of Halloumi cheese, a semi-hard cheese produced in Cyprus, to find that the dominant genus was Lactobacillus. Papademas and colleagues [47] performed a metagenomic analysis on the microbiota of Halitzia cheese, a traditional, white-brined cheese produced in Tilliria of Paphos, to identify Lactococcus, Lactobacillus, and Leuconostoc as the predominant genera. These results show that differences in the manufacturing conditions, including the degree of ripening, have a critical effect on the cheese microbiota formation. In agreement with this finding, metataxonomic analysis of the French “Tomme d’Orchies” cheese indicated a drastic reduction in the relative abundance of Lactococcus and an increment of Streptococcus spp. during the ripening period [53].
To identify how the aforementioned bacterial biomarkers influenced the microbial community dynamics, we constructed a co-occurrence network among the detected bacterial and fungal taxa per country, focusing on the detected biomarkers with their neighbor taxa associations. The analysis revealed that these key microbes were mostly negatively associated with the other members of the cheese microbiota. The predominance of L. lactis in ripened cheeses has been shown in several studies [45,54,55]. Their ability to survive in hard cheeses is due to shifting their metabolism to peptide and amino acid consumption [45], and their predominance is possibly due to antimicrobial peptide and bacteriocin production [56,57]. Similarly, Streptococcus and, specifically, S. thermophilus have the capability to consume amino acids producing aromatic compounds in hard cheeses [58]. This, in combination with their possession of genes encoding for bacteriocin and exopolysaccharide biosynthesis, may provide them with the requisite advantage to dominate over the other microbes in hard cheeses [59,60]. Likewise, L. delbrueckii possesses genes encoding enzymes for cheese proteolysis, exopolysaccharide, and bacteriocin production [61,62]. In addition to the detected negative associations, we also found positive associations between L. delbrueckii and Streptococcus. These results are in agreement with Charlet and colleagues, [63], and Parente and colleagues [3], indicating that these interactions are critical for their co-administration as starters in cheese-making, to prevent pathogenic or spoilage bacteria growth.
Apart from the predominant LAB, some spoilage bacteria were detected in low relative abundance in most cheeses. Specifically, some cheeses had members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and the genus Staphylococcus. The family Enterobacteriaceae includes some severe foodborne pathogens, including toxin producing Shigella spp., Salmonella spp., and some serotypes of E. coli, such as E. coli O157:H7 [64]. Among the Staphylococcus spp., S. aureus, which is commonly detected in cheeses, is an important foodborne pathogen and disease-causing bacterium in humans [65]. Moreover, two cheeses had low relative abundance of the species C. perfringens. C. perfringens is responsible for several enterotoxic and histotoxic diseases in humans, caused by the protein toxins it produces [66]. These results indicate that the application of post-pasteurization steps needs to be considered by cheese producers, to ensure the absence of these contaminants in cheeses.
ITS loci sequencing indicated that most of the analyzed cheeses were characterized by an increased relative representation of the species D. hansenii. The dominant presence of this species in cheese microbiota was detected in previous metataxonomic sequencing studies in Irish [49], Greek [51], and Cypriot cheeses [47]. The ability of D. hansenii to grow in elevated NaCl concentrations, with lactate as the basic carbon source, and low pH, favors their growth in cheeses during ripening [67]. Additionally, some Irish cheeses, two Greek, and two Cypriot cheeses were characterized by an increased relative abundance of the species identified as P. carneum. These species are closely related to Penicillium roqueforti, a species that is used as a starter for blue cheese production (Table 1), and was formerly classified as a variety of P. roqueforti [68]. However, in contrast to P. roqueforti, P. carneum produces a mycotoxin called patulin, which is harmful to human health. Due to their high ITS loci sequence similarity, P. roqueforti might have been misidentified as P. carneum. Notably, in addition to blue cheeses, P. carneum has also been detected in other cheeses. In addition to the aforementioned, P. commune, C. parapsilosis, C. zeylanoides, and C. inconspicua were among the predominant detected species. These spoilage fungi are among the most commonly occurring in cheeses [69,70]. P. commune is among the predominant species in low water content cheeses. Irish cheeses were characterized by the presence of the species C. glaebosa. These species have also been detected in other hard cheeses, such as Pecorino di Farindolais, [71], and cheeses from the province of Quebec, Canada [10], especially at the beginning of ripening. Greek cheeses showed an increased relative representation of the species K. marxianus and K. lactis, in line with Michailidou and colleagues [51]. The predominance of these Kluyveromyces species in ripened cheeses is due to their ability to ferment lactose, but they also possess proteolytic and lipolytic abilities [72]. Moreover, Cypriot cheeses showed an elevated relative abundance of the Hanseniaspora species. The presence of Hanseniaspora species is rarely detected in cheese samples [73]; their contribution to cheeses’ sensorial and qualitative characteristics therefore remains unknown, and this warrants further investigation.
In the future, more mature cheeses originating from different cities and countries, and produced not only from pasteurized, but from raw milk, will be analyzed and compared with similar types of cheeses, using an amplicon sequencing approach. Data will be added in dedicated food microbiome databases. This will allow us to identify biomarkers that might define PDO cheeses’ authenticity, and differentiate them from fraudulent products that may exist in the market. To achieve this, we will combine metataxonomic sequencing and Shotgun sequencing, with metabolomics, to discover the influence of the microbial consortia on cheeses’ aromatic profiles and flavors.

5. Conclusions

The present metataxonomic research provides a snapshot of the microbiological mapping of mature cheeses produced in different geographic locations. The study identified the microbial communities in several mature Irish, Greek, and Cypriot cheeses. Furthermore, it revealed the presence of key microbial species that differentiate Irish, Greek, and Cypriot mature cheeses. Even though the detected bacteria were those that were possibly used as starters, the development of interaction networks increased our understanding of how these microbes might affect community composition. Finally, the presence of several spoilage and potential pathogenic microbes raises a concern about the need for additional post-pasteurization measures in production of some mature cheeses. The findings of the present research demonstrate that the metagenome could be used as a biological marker of origin.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods11162483/s1: Figure S1. LEfSe analyses of taxon abundances of over-represented fungal taxa in Greek, compared to Cypriot and Irish cheeses; Figure S2. LEfSe analyses of taxon abundances of over-represented fungal taxa among the cheeses from the islands Crete, Limnos, and Mytillini; Table S1. Sample information, bacterial alpha diversity indexes, and observed OTUs; Table S2. Sample information, fungal alpha diversity indexes, and observed OTUs; Table S3. Comparison of the alpha microbial diversity of Cyprus, Greece, and Ireland, based on the Kruskal–Wallis test; Table S4. Comparison of the microbial beta diversity of mature cheeses originating from Ireland, Greece, and Cyprus, based on the PERMANOVA pairwise test; Table S5. Identified interactions between microbes in Irish cheeses in the co-occurrence network; Table S6. Identified interactions between microbes in Greek cheeses in the co-occurrence network; Table S7. Identified interactions between microbes in Cypriot cheeses in the co-occurrence network.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.S., R.P.R. and D.T.; methodology, E.K.; software, E.K.; validation, E.K.; formal analysis, E.K.; investigation, E.K.; resources, C.S. and R.P.R.; data curation, E.K.; writing—original draft preparation, E.K.; writing—review and editing, C.S., R.P.R. and D.T.; visualization, E.K.; supervision, C.S. and R.P.R.; project administration, C.S. and R.P.R.; funding acquisition, C.S. and R.P.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) through APC Microbiome Ireland, under Grant number SFI/12/RC/2273. The research was also funded by INTERREG Greece–Cyprus 2014–2020 Program, Project AGRO-ID, which is co-funded by the European Union (ERDF) and National Resources of Greece and Cyprus.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Acknowledgments

We wish to acknowledge Dimitrios Skalkos for his advice on sample collection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kamilari, E.; Tomazou, M.; Antoniades, A.; Tsaltas, D. High Throughput Sequencing Technologies as a New Toolbox for Deep Analysis, Characterization and Potentially Authentication of Protection Designation of Origin Cheeses? Int. J. Food Sci. 2019, 2019, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yeluri Jonnala, B.R.; McSweeney, P.L.H.; Sheehan, J.J.; Cotter, P.D. Sequencing of the Cheese Microbiome and Its Relevance to Industry. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Parente, E.; Zotta, T.; Ricciardi, A. Microbial association networks in cheese: A meta-analysis. BioRxiv 2021, 107, 2411–2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kamimura, B.A.; de Filippis, F.; Sant’Ana, A.S.; Ercolini, D. Large-scale mapping of microbial diversity in artisanal Brazilian cheeses. Food Microbiol. 2019, 80, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xue, J.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Guo, Y.; Shao, Y. Bacterial diversity in Chinese Rushan Cheese from different geographical origins. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1920–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Camargo, A.C.; Costa, E.A.; Fusieger, A.; de Freitas, R.; Nero, L.A.; de Carvalho, A.F. Microbial shifts through the ripening of the ‘Entre Serras’ Minas artisanal cheese monitored by high-throughput sequencing. Food Res. Int. 2021, 139, 109803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Aldrete-Tapia, A.; Escobar-Ramírez, C.M.; Tamplin, M.L.; Hernández-Iturriaga, M. Characterization of Bacterial Communities in Mexican Artisanal Raw Milk ‘Bola de Ocosingo’ Cheese by High-Throughput Sequencing. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Quigley, L.; O’Sullivan, O.; Stanton, C.; Beresford, T.P.; Ross, R.P.; Fitzgerald, G.F.; Cotter, P.D. The complex microbiota of raw milk. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 664–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kelleher, P.; Murphy, J.; Mahony, J.; van Sinderen, D. Next-generation sequencing as an approach to dairy starter selection. Dairy Sci. Technol. 2015, 95, 545–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lavoie, K.; Touchette, M.; St-Gelais, D.; Labrie, S. Characterization of the fungal microflora in raw milk and specialty cheeses of the province of Quebec. Dairy Sci. Technol. 2012, 92, 455–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ledenbach, L.H.; Marshall, R.T. Microbiological Spoilage of Dairy Products. In Compendium of the Microbiological Spoilage of Foods and Beverages; Sperber, W.H., Doyle, M.P., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 41–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hantsis-Zacharov, E.; Halpern, M. Culturable psychrotrophic bacterial communities in raw milk and their proteolytic and lipolytic traits. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 7162–7168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. COUSIN, M.A. Presence and Activity of Psychrotrophic Microorganisms in Milk and Dairy Products: A Review. J. Food Prot. 1982, 45, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Arslan, S.; Eyi, A.; Özdemir, F. Spoilage potentials and antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas sisolated from cheeses. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94, 5851–5856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. De Santana, E.H.W.; Luiz, L.L.; Pasquim, P.D.S.; Pinto, L.D.F.B.; Pereira, F.D.A.B.; Gasparini, G.B.F.B.; Lorenzetti, E.; Bruzaroski, S.R.; Eleodoro, J.I. Psychrotrophic microorganisms in raw milk and the cheese quality. Res. Soc. Dev. 2020, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Skovgaard, N. Fundamental food microbiology. Third edition. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 97, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Trmčić, A.; Chauhan, K.; Kent, D.J.; Ralyea, R.D.; Martin, N.H.; Boor, K.J.; Wiedmann, M. Coliform detection in cheese is associated with specific cheese characteristics, but no association was found with pathogen detection. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 6105–6120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Laleye, L.C.; Simard, R.E.; Lee, B.H.; Holley, R.A. Control of Heterofermentative Bacteria During Cheddar Cheese Maturation by Homofermentative Lactobacillus Starters. J. Dairy Sci. 1989, 72, 3134–3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Martín, J.F.; Liras, P. Secondary Metabolites in Cheese Fungi. In Fungal Metabolites; Merillon, J.M., Ramawat, K.G., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 293–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kamilari, E.; Anagnostopoulos, D.A.; Papademas, P.; Kamilaris, A.; Tsaltas, D. Characterizing Halloumi cheese’s bacterial communities through metagenomic analysis. LWT 2020, 126, 109298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bokulich, N.A.; Collins, T.S.; Masarweh, C.; Allen, G.; Heymann, H.; Ebeler, S.E.; Mills, D.A. Associations among wine grape microbiome, metabolome, and fermentation behavior suggest microbial contribution to regional wine characteristics. mBio 2016, 7, e00631-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kamilari, E.; Mina, M.; Karallis, C.; Tsaltas, D. Metataxonomic Analysis of Grape Microbiota During Wine Fermentation Reveals the Distinction of Cyprus Regional terroirs. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 726483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Papademas, P.; Kamilari, E.; Aspri, M.; Anagnostopoulos, D.A.; Mousikos, P.; Kamilaris, A.; Tsaltas, D. Investigation of the Cyprus donkey milk bacterial diversity by 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing on a Cyprus donkey farm. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 104, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lozupone, C.; Knight, R. UniFrac: A new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lozupone, C.A.; Hamady, M.; Kelley, S.T.; Knight, R. Quantitative and qualitative β diversity measures lead to different insights into factors that structure microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bolyen, E.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.R.; Bokulich, N.A.; Abnet, C.C.; Al-Ghalith, G.A.; Alexander, H.; Alm, E.J.; Arumugam, M.; Asnicar, F.; et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 852–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kamilari, E.; Anagnostopoulos, D.A.; Papademas, P.; Efthymiou, M.; Tretiak, S.; Tsaltas, D. Snapshot of Cyprus Raw Goat Milk Bacterial Diversity via 16S rDNA High-Throughput Sequencing; Impact of Cold Storage Conditions. Fermentation 2020, 6, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. ANDERSON, M.J. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral. Ecol. 2008, 26, 32–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bokulich, N.A.; Kaehler, B.D.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.; Bolyen, E.; Knight, R.; Huttley, G.A.; Gregory Caporaso, J. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 2018, 6, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. McDonald, D.; Price, M.N.; Goodrich, J.; Nawrocki, E.P.; DeSantis, T.Z.; Probst, A.; Andersen, G.L.; Knight, R.; Hugenholtz, P. An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME J. 2012, 6, 610–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abarenkov, K.; Nilsson, R.H.; Larsson, K.-H.; Alexander, I.J.; Eberhardt, U.; Erland, S.; Høiland, K.; Kjøller, R.; Larsson, E.; Pennanen, T.; et al. The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi-recent updates and future perspectives. New Phytologist. 2010, 186, 281–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Segata, N.; Abubucker, S.; Goll, J.; Schubert, A.M.; Izard, J.; Cantarel, B.L.; Rodriguez-Mueller, B.; Waldron, L.; Zucker, J.; Thiagarajan, M.; et al. Microbial community function and biomarker discovery in the human microbiome. Genome Biol. 2011, 12, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bokulich, N.A.; Dillon, M.R.; Bolyen, E.; Kaehler, B.D.; Huttley, G.A.; Caporaso, J.G. q2-sample-classifier: Machine-learning tools for microbiome classification and regression. J. Open Res. Softw. 2018, 3, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Pedregosa, F.; Varoquaux, G.; Gramfort, A.; Michel, V.; Thirion, B.; Grisel, O.; Blondel, M.; Prettenhofer, P.; Weiss, R.; Dubourg, V. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011, 12, 2825–2830. [Google Scholar]
  35. Faust, K.; Raes, J. CoNet app: Inference of biological association networks using Cytoscape. F1000Res 2016, 5, 1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Shannon, P.; Markiel, A.; Ozier, O.; Baliga, N.S.; Wang, J.T.; Ramage, D.; Amin, N.; Schwikowski, B.; Ideker, T. Cytoscape: A software Environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2498–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ma, B.; Wang, H.; Dsouza, M.; Lou, J.; He, Y.; Dai, Z.; Brookes, P.C.; Xu, J.; Gilbert, J.A. Geographic patterns of co-occurrence network topological features for soil microbiota at continental scale in eastern China. ISME J. 2016, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ju, F.; Xia, Y.; Guo, F.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, T. Taxonomic relatedness shapes bacterial assembly in activated sludge of globally distributed wastewater treatment plants. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 2421–2432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Grass, J.E.; Gould, L.H.; Mahon, B.E. Epidemiology of foodborne disease outbreaks caused by Clostridium perfringens, United States, 1998–2010. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2013, 10, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. M Zago, M.; Bardelli, T.; Rossetti, L.; Nazzicari, N.; Carminati, D.; Galli, A.; Giraffa, G. Evaluation of bacterial communities of Grana Padano cheese by DNA metabarcoding and DNA fingerprinting analysis. Food Microbiol. 2021, 93, 103613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, C.; You, L.; Kwok, L.-Y.; Jin, H.; Peng, J.; Zhao, Z.; Sun, Z. Strain-level multiomics analysis reveals significant variation in cheeses from different regions. LWT 2021, 151, 112043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bokulich, N.A.; Mills, D.A. Facility-specific ‘house’ microbiome drives microbial landscapes of artisan cheesemaking plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 5214–5223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wolfe, B.E.; Button, J.E.; Santarelli, M.; Dutton, R.J. Cheese rind communities provide tractable systems for in situ and in vitro studies of microbial diversity. Cell 2014, 158, 422–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tidona, F.; Francolino, S.; Ghiglietti, R.; Locci, F.; Carminati, D.; LaForce, P.; Giraffa, G. Characterization and pre-industrial validation of Streptococcus thermophilus strains to be used as starter cultures for Crescenza, an Italian soft cheese. Food Microbiol. 2020, 92, 103599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ruggirello, M.; Cocolin, L.; Dolci, P. Fate of Lactococcus lactis starter cultures during late ripening in cheese models. Food Microbiol. 2016, 59, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Dolci, P.; Ferrocino, I.; Giordano, M.; Pramotton, R.; Vernetti-Prot, L.; Zenato, S.; Barmaz, A. Impact of Lactococcus lactis as starter culture on microbiota and metabolome profile of an Italian raw milk cheese. Int. Dairy J. 2020, 110, 104804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Papademas, P.; Aspri, M.; Mariou, M.; Dowd, S.E.; Kazou, M.; Tsakalidou, E. Conventional and omics approaches shed light on Halitzia cheese, a long-forgotten white-brined cheese from Cyprus. Int. Dairy J. 2019, 98, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bachmann, H.P.; Bütikofer, U.; Fröhlich-Wyder, M.T.; Isolini, D.; Jakob, E. Cheese: Swiss-Type Cheeses. In Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2011; pp. 712–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Walsh, A.M.; Macori, G.; Kilcawley, K.N.; Cotter, P.D. Meta-analysis of cheese microbiomes highlights contributions to multiple aspects of quality. Nat. Food 2020, 1, 500–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Quigley, L.; O’Sullivan, O.; Beresford, T.P.; Ross, R.P.; Fitzgerald, G.F.; Cotter, P.D. High-throughput sequencing for detection of subpopulations of bacteria not previously associated with artisanal cheeses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 5717–5723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Michailidou, S.; Pavlou, E.; Pasentsis, K.; Rhoades, J.; Likotrafiti, E.; Argiriou, A. Microbial profiles of Greek PDO cheeses assessed with amplicon metabarcoding. Food Microbiol. 2021, 99, 103836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Spyrelli, E.D.; Stamatiou, A.; Tassou, C.C.; Nychas, G.J.E.; Doulgeraki, A.I. Microbiological and metagenomic analysis to assess the effect of container material on the microbiota of Feta cheese during ripening. Fermentation 2020, 6, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ceugniez, A.; Taminiau, B.; Coucheney, F.; Jacques, P.; Delcenserie, V.; Daube, G.; Drider, D. Use of a metagenetic approach to monitor the bacterial microbiota of ‘Tomme d’Orchies’ cheese during the ripening process. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017, 247, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Desfossés-Foucault, É.; LaPointe, G.; Roy, D. Dynamics and rRNA transcriptional activity of lactococci and lactobacilli during Cheddar cheese ripening. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2013, 166, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ruggirello, M.; Dolci, P.; Cocolin, L. Detection and viability of Lactococcus lactis throughout cheese ripening. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e114280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Dal Bello, B.; Cocolin, L.; Zeppa, G.; Field, D.; Cotter, P.D.; Hill, C. Technological characterization of bacteriocin producing Lactococcus lactis strains employed to control Listeria monocytogenes in Cottage cheese. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 153, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Shin, J.M.; Gwak, J.W.; Kamarajan, P.; Fenno, J.C.; Rickard, A.H.; Kapila, Y.L. Biomedical applications of nisin. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 120, 1449–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Helinck, S.; le Bars, D.; Moreau, D.; Yvon, M. Ability of thermophilic lactic acid bacteria to produce aroma compounds from amino acids. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 3855–3861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rasmussen, T.B.; Danielsen, M.; Valina, O.; Garrigues, C.; Johansen, E.; Pedersen, M.B. Streptococcus thermophilus core genome: Comparative genome hybridization study of 47 strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 4703–4710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bolotin, A.; Quinquis, B.; Renault, P.; Sorokine, A.; Ehrlich, S.D.; Kulakauskas, S.; Lapidus, A.; Goltsman, E.; Mazur, M.M.; Pusch, G.D.; et al. Complete sequence and comparative genome analysis of the dairy bacterium Streptococcus thermophilus. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004, 22, 1554–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Buchin, S.; Duboz, G.; Salmon, J.C. Lactobacillus delbrueckii subslactis as a starter culture significantly affects the dynamics of volatile compound profiles of hard cooked cheeses. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2017, 243, 1943–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Rizzello, C.G.; De Angelis, M.; Lactobacillus delbrueckii Group. Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences, 2nd ed.; Fuquay, J.W., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011; pp. 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Charlet, M.; Duboz, G.; Faurie, F.; Le Quéré, J.L.; Berthier, F. Multiple interactions between Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus helveticus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii strongly affect their growth kinetics during the making of hard cooked cheeses. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 131, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mladenovic, K.G.; Grujovic, M.Z.; Kis, M.; Furmeg, S.; Tkalec, V.J.; Stefanovic, O.D.; Kocic-Tanackov, S.D. Enterobacteriaceae in food safety with an emphasis on raw milk and meat. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 8615–8627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Al-Nabulsi, A.A.; Osaili, T.M.; AbuNaser, R.A.; Olaimat, A.N.; Ayyash, M.; Al-Holy, M.A.; Kadora, K.M.; Holley, R.A. Factors affecting the viability of Staphylococcus aureus and production of enterotoxin during processing and storage of white-brined cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 6869–6881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Uzal, F.A.; Freedman, J.C.; Shrestha, A.; Theoret, J.R.; Garcia, J.; Awad, M.M.; Adams, V.; Moore, R.J.; Rood, J.I.; Mc Clane, B.A. Towards an understanding of the role of Clostridium perfringens toxins in human and animal disease. Future Microbiol. 2014, 9, 361–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Petersen, K.M.; Westall, S.; Jespersen, L. Microbial succession of Debaryomyces hansenii strains during the production of Danish surfaced-ripened cheeses. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85, 478–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ogawa, Y.; Hirose, D.; Akiyama, A.; Ichinoe, M. Examination of the Taxonomic Position of Penicillium Strains Used in Blue Cheese Production Based on the Partial Sequence of β-Tubulin. J. Food Hyg. Soc. Jpn. 2014, 55, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Garnier, L.; Valence, F.; Mounier, J. Diversity and control of spoilage fungi in dairy products: An update. Microorganisms 2017, 5, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jurado, M.; Vicente, C.J. Penicillium commune affects textural properties and water distribution of hard and extra-hard cheeses. J. Dairy Res. 2020, 87, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Tofalo, R.; Fasoli, G.; Schirone, M.; Perpetuini, G.; Pepe, A.; Corsetti, A.; Suzzi, G. The predominance, biodiversity and biotechnological properties of Kluyveromyces marxianus in the production of Pecorino di Farindola cheese. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 187, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Belloch, C.; Querol, A.; Barrio, E. Yeasts and Molds: Kluyveromyces spp. In Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Edinburgh, UK, 2011; Volume 3, pp. 1417–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Geronikou, A.; Srimahaeak, T.; Rantsiou, K.; Triantafillidis, G.; Larsen, N.; Jespersen, L. Occurrence of Yeasts in White-Brined Cheeses: Methodologies for Identification, Spoilage Potential and Good Manufacturing Practices. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 582778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Map of cheese samples collection countries.
Figure 1. Map of cheese samples collection countries.
Foods 11 02483 g001
Figure 2. Comparison of (A) bacterial and (B) fungal alpha diversities of Cyprus, Greek, and Irish cheeses, based on the Chao1 index. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test.
Figure 2. Comparison of (A) bacterial and (B) fungal alpha diversities of Cyprus, Greek, and Irish cheeses, based on the Chao1 index. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test.
Foods 11 02483 g002
Figure 3. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot, showing the similarities in microbial beta diversity among cheeses: (A) from different countries, regarding bacterial beta diversity; (B) from different areas, regarding bacterial beta diversity; (C) produced by milk from different animals, regarding bacterial beta diversity; (D) from different countries, regarding fungal beta diversity; according to Unweighted Unifrac distance.
Figure 3. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot, showing the similarities in microbial beta diversity among cheeses: (A) from different countries, regarding bacterial beta diversity; (B) from different areas, regarding bacterial beta diversity; (C) produced by milk from different animals, regarding bacterial beta diversity; (D) from different countries, regarding fungal beta diversity; according to Unweighted Unifrac distance.
Foods 11 02483 g003
Figure 4. The relative abundance of the twenty most abundant bacteria identified at: (A) the genus level; (B) the species level, based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing for Cyprus, Greek, and Irish cheeses.
Figure 4. The relative abundance of the twenty most abundant bacteria identified at: (A) the genus level; (B) the species level, based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing for Cyprus, Greek, and Irish cheeses.
Foods 11 02483 g004
Figure 5. The relative abundance of the twenty most abundant fungi identified at: (A) the genus level; (B) the species level, based on ITS loci sequencing for Cyprus, Greek, and Irish cheeses.
Figure 5. The relative abundance of the twenty most abundant fungi identified at: (A) the genus level; (B) the species level, based on ITS loci sequencing for Cyprus, Greek, and Irish cheeses.
Foods 11 02483 g005
Figure 6. Biomarkers discovery using the LEfSe algorithm showing (A) bacterial and (B) fungal taxa that indicated statistically significant over-representation among the Irish, Greek, and Cypriot cheeses, based on a non-parametric factorial Kruskal–Wallis (KW) sum–rank test, an (unpaired) Wilcoxon rank–sum test, and LDA. The left part of the picture depicts phylogenetic trees that map the taxonomic differences of the detected biomarkers from class (outside part of the circle) to species level (inside part of the circle), combined with a list of taxa with significantly increased representation in cheeses from Cyprus (red color), Greece (green color), and Ireland (blue color). The right part of the picture shows histograms of the taxa that indicated significantly increased relative representation in cheeses from Ireland, Greece or Cyprus, their detected relative abundances, and in how many samples they were detected.
Figure 6. Biomarkers discovery using the LEfSe algorithm showing (A) bacterial and (B) fungal taxa that indicated statistically significant over-representation among the Irish, Greek, and Cypriot cheeses, based on a non-parametric factorial Kruskal–Wallis (KW) sum–rank test, an (unpaired) Wilcoxon rank–sum test, and LDA. The left part of the picture depicts phylogenetic trees that map the taxonomic differences of the detected biomarkers from class (outside part of the circle) to species level (inside part of the circle), combined with a list of taxa with significantly increased representation in cheeses from Cyprus (red color), Greece (green color), and Ireland (blue color). The right part of the picture shows histograms of the taxa that indicated significantly increased relative representation in cheeses from Ireland, Greece or Cyprus, their detected relative abundances, and in how many samples they were detected.
Foods 11 02483 g006
Figure 7. Microbial taxa that can accurately differentiate cheeses from Ireland, Greek and Cyprus. (A) ROS and PCROC analyses for bacterial taxa, indicating true and false positive rates for cheeses from each country, shows perfect predictive accuracy (AUC = 1.00). The confusion matrix shows the proportion of how many times every sample gets the correct classification. (B) Heatmap showing the 13 top bacterial predictive features that differentiate cheeses from each country. (C) ROS and PCROC analyses for fungal taxa, indicating true and false positive rates for cheeses from each country, shows perfect predictive accuracy (AUC = 1.00). The confusion matrix shows the proportion of how many times every sample gets the correct classification. (D) Heatmap showing the 30 top fungal predictive features that differentiate cheeses from each country.
Figure 7. Microbial taxa that can accurately differentiate cheeses from Ireland, Greek and Cyprus. (A) ROS and PCROC analyses for bacterial taxa, indicating true and false positive rates for cheeses from each country, shows perfect predictive accuracy (AUC = 1.00). The confusion matrix shows the proportion of how many times every sample gets the correct classification. (B) Heatmap showing the 13 top bacterial predictive features that differentiate cheeses from each country. (C) ROS and PCROC analyses for fungal taxa, indicating true and false positive rates for cheeses from each country, shows perfect predictive accuracy (AUC = 1.00). The confusion matrix shows the proportion of how many times every sample gets the correct classification. (D) Heatmap showing the 30 top fungal predictive features that differentiate cheeses from each country.
Foods 11 02483 g007
Figure 8. The correlation pattern of microbial communities in: (A) Irish cheeses; (B) Greek cheeses; (C) Cypriot cheeses. Green and light-blue edges represent positive or negative correlations between two nodes, based on Spearman’s rank correlation, the Pearson correlation, and the Bray Curtis and Kullback–Leibler dissimilarity matrices. Red and blue squares represent the bacterial and the fungal taxa, respectively.
Figure 8. The correlation pattern of microbial communities in: (A) Irish cheeses; (B) Greek cheeses; (C) Cypriot cheeses. Green and light-blue edges represent positive or negative correlations between two nodes, based on Spearman’s rank correlation, the Pearson correlation, and the Bray Curtis and Kullback–Leibler dissimilarity matrices. Red and blue squares represent the bacterial and the fungal taxa, respectively.
Foods 11 02483 g008
Table 1. Information about the collected samples (cheeses have been anonymized for commercial reasons).
Table 1. Information about the collected samples (cheeses have been anonymized for commercial reasons).
Sample-idCountry of OriginArea of ProductionType of CheeseMilk SourceRaw/Pasteurized MilkStarter CultureRipeningSmoking
C1CyprusNicosiaKefalotyrisheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriasemino
C2CyprusNicosiaKefalotyrisheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriasemino
C3CyprusFamachustaKefalotyrisheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
C4CyprusNicosiaKefalotyrisheepPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
C5CyprusNicosiaKefalotyrisheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
C6CyprusNicosiaKefalotyrisheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriasemino
C7CyprusNicosiaKefalotyrisheepPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriasemino
C8CyprusNicosiaKefalotyrisheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
C9CyprusPaphosKefalotyrisheepPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
C10CyprusPaphosKefalotyrisheepPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
GK1GreeceCreteGravierasheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
GK2GreeceCreteGravierasheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
GK3GreeceCreteGravierasheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
GK4GreeceCreteGravierasheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
GK5GreeceCreteGravierasheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
GK6GreeceCreteGravierasheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
GK7GreeceCreteGravierasheepPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
GK8GreeceCreteGravierasheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
GK9GreeceCreteGravierasheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
GK10GreeceCreteGravierasheepPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
GL1GreeceLimnosKaskavallisheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriasemino
GL2GreeceLimnosKalathakisheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriasemino
GL3GreeceLimnosMelichlorosheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
GM1GreeceMytilliniKefalotirisheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
GM2GreeceMytilliniLadotyrisheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriasemino
GM3GreeceMytilliniKaserisheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriasemino
GM4GreeceMytilliniGravierasheepPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
GM5GreeceMytilliniLadotyrisheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
GM6GreeceMytilliniLadotyrisheepPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
GM7GreeceMytilliniLadotyrisheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
GM8GreeceMytilliniLadotyrisheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
GM9GreeceMytilliniGravierasheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
GM10GreeceMytilliniLadotyrisheep and goatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardno
I1IrelandClareCheddargoatRawnosemino
I2IrelandTipperaryBlue cheesesheepPasteurizedlactic acid bacteria and Penicillum roquefortiisemino
I3IrelandCorkArtisancowPasteurizedStarter culturesemino
I4IrelandCavanArtisangoat, sheep and cowRawStarter culturehardno
I5IrelandCorkArtisangoatPasteurizedlactic acid bacteriahardyes
I6IrelandCorkArtisancowPasteurizedStarter culturesemiyes
I7IrelandCorkArtisancowPasteurizedStarter culturehardno
I8IrelandCorkFine SwisscowRawStarter cultureshardno
I9IrelandTipperaryBlue cheesecowPasteurizedstarter cultures and Penicillum roquefortiisemino
I10IrelandCorkArtisancowPasteurizedStarter culturessemino
I11IrelandWaterfordCheddarcowPasteurizedStarter cultureshardno
I12IrelandWaterfordCheddarcowPasteurizedStarter cultureshardno
I13IrelandWaterfordCheddarcowRawStarter cultureshardno
I14IrelandWaterfordCheddarcowRawStarter cultureshardno
I15IrelandOffalyCheddarcowPasteurizedStarter cultureshardno
I16IrelandTipperaryArtisansheepPasteurizedStarter cultureshardno
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kamilari, E.; Tsaltas, D.; Stanton, C.; Ross, R.P. Metataxonomic Mapping of the Microbial Diversity of Irish and Eastern Mediterranean Cheeses. Foods 2022, 11, 2483. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11162483

AMA Style

Kamilari E, Tsaltas D, Stanton C, Ross RP. Metataxonomic Mapping of the Microbial Diversity of Irish and Eastern Mediterranean Cheeses. Foods. 2022; 11(16):2483. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11162483

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kamilari, Eleni, Dimitrios Tsaltas, Catherine Stanton, and R. Paul Ross. 2022. "Metataxonomic Mapping of the Microbial Diversity of Irish and Eastern Mediterranean Cheeses" Foods 11, no. 16: 2483. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11162483

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop