Next Article in Journal
Chicken Authentication and Discrimination via Live Weight, Body Size, Carcass Traits, and Breast Muscle Fat Content Clustering as Affected by Breed and Sex Varieties in Malaysia
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Anthocyanin Profiles in Various Blackcurrant Cultivars over a Three-Year Period Using a Fast HPLC-DAD Method
Previous Article in Journal
1H NMR Study of the In Vitro Digestion of Highly Oxidized Soybean Oil and the Effect of the Presence of Ovalbumin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Ripening on the Phenolic Composition and Mineral Content of Three Varieties of Olive Fruits
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Authentication and Grading of Edible Bird’s Nest by Metabolite, Nutritional, and Mineral Profiling

Foods 2021, 10(7), 1574; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10071574
by Ramlah Mohamad Ibrahim 1, Nurul Nadiah Mohamad Nasir 1, Md Zuki Abu Bakar 1,2, Rozi Mahmud 3 and Nor Asma Ab Razak 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Foods 2021, 10(7), 1574; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10071574
Submission received: 15 April 2021 / Revised: 14 May 2021 / Accepted: 17 May 2021 / Published: 7 July 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The comment are present in the attached file. Thanks

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the response in the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Reviewer's comment on Manuscript Number: foods-1204899

The manuscript aim was to evaluate the purity, metabolite  constituents, and nutrient composition between the different shapes of house edible bird’s nest (EBN), which is a half cup and stripe-shaped. The subject of the manuscript falls within the scope of Foods. The results are interesting and valuable especially for Chinese population, which is the main consumer of

 

I have a few questions concerning the manuscript:

  1. What are the types and shapes of edible bird’s nest? The introduction lacks this information.
  2. How many samples of each type were analyzed?
  3. Why water extract was used for GC MS, where injection of water is not recommended? How the extraction was performed – the manuscript lacks description
  4. What was the aim of GC MS analysis? What can be reason for finding such metabolites?
  5. Were methods of analysis validated? Such protocol should be described. Especially in case of minerals data should be given, including LOD and LOQ as some heavy metals were not detected (in such case LOD should be given). Without validation data comparison with literature data should not be performed.
  6. What is the consumption of EBN and the consumers’ risk of intoxication in view of PTWI?

 

Author Response

Please see the response in the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

I propose to accept the manuscript as it is.

Back to TopTop