Few Open Access Journals Are Compliant with Plan S
AbstractMuch of the debate on Plan S seems to concentrate on how to make toll-access journals open access, taking for granted that existing open access journals are Plan S-compliant. We suspected this was not so and set out to explore this using Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) metadata. We conclude that a large majority of open access journals are not Plan S-compliant, and that it is small publishers in the humanities and social sciences (HSS) not charging article processing charges (APC) that will face the largest challenge with becoming compliant. Plan S needs to give special considerations to smaller publishers and/or non-APC based journals. View Full-Text
Externally hosted supplementary file 1
Description: Supplementary material (data) not yet ready for publication, but is in preparation.
Share & Cite This Article
Frantsvåg, J.E.; Strømme, T.E. Few Open Access Journals Are Compliant with Plan S. Publications 2019, 7, 26.
Frantsvåg JE, Strømme TE. Few Open Access Journals Are Compliant with Plan S. Publications. 2019; 7(2):26.Chicago/Turabian Style
Frantsvåg, Jan E.; Strømme, Tormod E. 2019. "Few Open Access Journals Are Compliant with Plan S." Publications 7, no. 2: 26.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.