Next Article in Journal
Multilingual Research Writing beyond English: The Case of Norwegian Academic Discourse in an Era of Multilingual Publication Practices
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Transparent Attribution of Contributions to Research: Aligning Guidelines to Real-Life Practices
Article Menu

Article Versions

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle
Publications 2019, 7(2), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020023

The Two-Way Street of Open Access Journal Publishing: Flip It and Reverse It

1
John F. Kennedy Institute, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany
2
Göttingen State and University Library, University of Göttingen, 37073 Göttingen, Germany
3
Information Systems Science, Hanken School of Economics, 00100 Helsinki, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 8 February 2019 / Revised: 8 March 2019 / Accepted: 28 March 2019 / Published: 3 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Frontiers for Openness in Scholarly Publishing)
PDF [867 KB, uploaded 3 April 2019]
  |  

Abstract

As Open access (OA) is often perceived as the end goal of scholarly publishing, much research has focused on flipping subscription journals to an OA model. Focusing on what can happen after the presumed finish line, this study identifies journals that have converted from OA to a subscription model, and places these “reverse flips” within the greater context of scholarly publishing. In particular, we examine specific journal descriptors, such as access mode, publisher, subject area, society affiliation, article volume, and citation metrics, to deepen our understanding of reverse flips. Our results show that at least 152 actively publishing journals have reverse-flipped since 2005, suggesting that this phenomenon does not constitute merely a few marginal outliers, but instead a common pattern within scholarly publishing. Notably, we found that 62% of reverse flips (N = 95) had not been born-OA journals, but had been founded as subscription journals, and hence have experienced a three-stage transformation from closed to open to closed. We argue that reverse flips present a unique perspective on OA, and that further research would greatly benefit from enhanced data and tools for identifying such cases.
Keywords: scholarly publishing; scholarly journals; open access; bibliometrics scholarly publishing; scholarly journals; open access; bibliometrics
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Matthias, L.; Jahn, N.; Laakso, M. The Two-Way Street of Open Access Journal Publishing: Flip It and Reverse It. Publications 2019, 7, 23.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Publications EISSN 2304-6775 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top