Scientific Production on Open Access: A Worldwide Bibliometric Analysis in the Academic and Scientific Context
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- -
- Diachronically analyze the presence of the theme open access in the international scientific literature;
- -
- Identify the leading countries and main authors;
- -
- Explicate the core journals disseminating the theme;
- -
- View the scientific collaboration network among the most productive authors;
- -
- Identify the main sub-themes pertaining to the theme and their co-occurrences in the analyzed literature, through the words present in titles and abstracts of articles.
2. Data and Methods
TITLE: search in the field title |
KEY: search in the field keyword |
TITLE-ABS-KEY: search in the fields title, abstract and keyword simultaneously DOCTYPE(ar): limits the search to the type of document “Articles” |
PUBYEAR < AND PUBYEAR >: limits the search to a period of time according to the year of publication |
Country | Article Number | % |
---|---|---|
United States | 358 | 30.4 |
United Kingdom | 158 | 13.4 |
Spain | 70 | 5.9 |
Germany | 67 | 5.7 |
Canada | 58 | 4.9 |
India | 54 | 4.6 |
Australia | 38 | 3.2 |
France | 33 | 2.8 |
The Netherlands | 29 | 2.5 |
Italy | 26 | 2.2 |
Brazil | 26 | 2.2 |
China | 21 | 1.8 |
Finland | 21 | 1.8 |
Austria | 20 | 1.7 |
Switzerland | 20 | 1.7 |
Belgium | 17 | 1.4 |
Greece | 17 | 1.4 |
Nigeria | 15 | 1.3 |
Iran | 14 | 1.2 |
Denmark | 14 | 1.2 |
South Africa | 14 | 1.2 |
Sweden | 13 | 1.1 |
Researcher (Country) | Article Number |
---|---|
Björk, Bo-Christer (Finland) | 18 |
Xia, Jingfeng (United States) | 10 |
Davis, Philip M. (United States) | 8 |
Harnad, Stevan (Canada) | 8 |
Schopfel, Joachim (France) | 7 |
Solomon, David J. (United States) | 7 |
Abadal, Ernest (Spain) | 6 |
Bauer, Bruno (Austria) | 6 |
Laakso, Mikael (Finland) | 6 |
Melero, Remedios (Spain) | 6 |
Moskovkin, Vladimir M. (Russian Federation) | 6 |
Mukherjee, Bhaskar M. (India) | 6 |
Abrizah, Abdullah (Malaysia) | 5 |
Beall, Jeffrey (United States) | 5 |
Jacsó, Péter (United States) | 5 |
Kousha, Kayvan (Iran) | 5 |
McGrath, Mike (United Kingdom) | 5 |
Nicholas, David (United Kingdom) | 5 |
Oppenheim, Charles B. (United Kingdom) | 5 |
Rodrigues, Rosângela S. (Brazil) | 5 |
Sánchez Tarragó, Nancy (Cuba) | 5 |
Willinsky, John (United States) | 5 |
Journal (Country of Editor) | Article Number | % | Quartile | Via |
---|---|---|---|---|
Serials Librarian (U.K.) | 34 | 2.9 | Green | |
Q1 | ||||
Learned Publishing (U.K.) | 23 | 2.0 | Q1 | Blue |
J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol (USA) | 23 | 2.0 | Q1 | Green |
Information Services and Use (Netherlands) | 22 | 1.9 | Q3 | Green |
Serials Review (U.K.) | 21 | 1.8 | Q2 | Green |
El Profesional de la Información (Spain) | 20 | 1.7 | Q2 | Blue |
Insights (U.K.) | 20 | 1.7 | Q3 | --- 1 |
OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives (U.K.) | 19 | 1.6 | Q3 | Green |
Journal of Academic Librarianship (Netherlands) | 18 | 1.5 | Q1 | Green |
First Monday (USA) | 18 | 1.5 | Q2 | Blue |
VOEB-Mitteilungen (Austria) | 16 | 1.4 | Q4 | --- 1 |
Online Information Review (U.K.) | 16 | 1.4 | Q2 | Green |
D-Lib Magazine (USA) | 16 | 1.4 | Q1 | Blue |
TripleC (Austria) | 14 | 1.2 | Q2 | Green |
Scientometrics (Netherlands) | 14 | 1.2 | Q1 | Green |
Interlending and Document Supply (U.K.) | 14 | 1.2 | Q2 | Green |
LIBER Quarterly (Netherlands) | 13 | 1.1 | Q3 | Green |
Information Research (U.K.) | 12 | 1.0 | Q3 | Blue |
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Evolution of the Theme Open Access in the International Scientific Literature
3.2. Countries and Main Authors of the Theme Open Access in the International Scientific Literature
3.3. Core Journals of the Theme Open Access in the International Scientific Literature
3.4. Scientific Collaboration Network among the Most Productive Authors
3.5. Main Sub-Themes Pertaining to the OA Subject
4. Final Remarks
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Drott, M.C. Open access. Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 79–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- White, S.; Creaser, C. Trends in Scholarly Journal Prices 2000–2006; LISU: Loughborough, UK, 2007; Available online: http://www.lboro.ac.uk/microsites/infosci/lisu/downloads/op37.pdf (accessed on 8 May 2010).
- BOAI. Budapest Open Access Initiative; Open Society Institute: Budapest, Hungary; Available online: http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml (accessed on 21 september 2015).
- Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities. Available online: http://openaccess.mpg.de/ (accessed on 15 September 2015).
- Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing. Available online: http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm (accessed on 20 September 2015).
- Björk, B.-C.; Laakso, M.; Welling, P.; Paetau, P. Anatomy of green open access. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2014, 65, 237–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graziotin, D.; Wang, X.; Abrahamsson, P. A framework for systematic analysis of open access journals and its application in software engineering and information systems. Scientometrics 2014, 101, 1627–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harnad, S.; Brody, T.; Vallieres, F.; Carr, L.; Hitchcock, S.; Gingras, Y.; Oppenheim, C.; Hajjem, C.; Hilf, E. The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access: An Update. Ser. Rev. 2008, 34, 36–40. Available online: http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/15852/ (accessed on 20 August 2015). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laakso, M. Green open access policies of scholarly publishers: A study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed. Scientometrics 2014, 99, 475–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rizor, S.L.; Holley, R.P. Open Access Goals Revisited: How Green and Gold Open Access Are Meeting (or Not) Their Original Goals. J. Sch. Publ. 2014, 45, 321. Available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jsp.45.4.01 (accessed on 20 August 2015). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suber, P. Ensuring Open Access for Publicly Funded Research. Br. Med. J. 2012, 345. Available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5184 (accessed on 20 August 2012). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Björk, B.-C.; Welling, P.; Laakso, M.; Majlender, P.; Hedlund, T.; Guðnason, G. Open access to the scientific journal literature: Situation 2009. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miguel, S.; Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Z.; Moya Anegón, F. Open access and Scopus: A new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2011, 62, 1130–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gargouri, Y.; Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Carr, L.; Harnad, S. Green and Gold Open Access Percentages and Growth, by Discipline. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3664 (accessed on 15 September 2012).
- Düzyol, G.; Taşkın, Z.; Tonta, Y. Mapping the Intellectual Structure of the Open Access Field through Co-citation Analysis. In Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Pre-Conference: Open Access to Science Information Trends, Models and Strategies for Libraries, Crete, Greece, 6–8 August 2010.
- Craig, I.D.; Plume, A.M.; McVeigh, M.E.; Pringle, J.; Amin, M. Do open access articles have greater citation impact? A critical review of the literature. J. Informetr. 2007, 1, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Codina, L. Scopus: The greatest scientist of the web browser. Prof. Inf. 2005, 14, 44–49. [Google Scholar]
- Fingerman, S. Scopus: Profusion and confusion. Online 2005, 29, 36–38. [Google Scholar]
- Jacsó, P. As We May Search—Comparison of Major Features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar Citation-Based and Citation Enhanced Databases. Curr. Sci. 2005, 89, 1537–1547. Available online: http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/nov102005/1537.pdf (accessed on 20 August 2015). [Google Scholar]
- Fingerman, S. Web of Science and Scopus: Current Features and Capabilities. Issues Sci. Technol. Librariansh. 2006, 48. Available online: http://www.istl.org/06-fall/electronic2.html (accessed on 20 August 2015). [Google Scholar]
- Jacsó, P. Comparison of journal impact rankings in the SCImago Journal & Country Rank and the Journal Citation Reports databases. Online Inf. Rev. 2010, 34, 642–657. [Google Scholar]
- Bakkalbasi, N.; Bauer, K.; Glover, J.; Wang, L. Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomed. Digit. Libr. 2006, 3, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Falagas, M.E.; Pitsouni, E.I.; Malietzis, G.A.; Pappas, G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008, 22, 338–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Braun, T.; Glänzel, W.; Schubert, A. How balanced is the Science Citation Index’s journal coverage? A preliminary overview of macro level statistical data. In The Web of Knowledge—A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield; Cronin, B., Atkins, H.B., Eds.; Information Today: Medford, NJ, USA, 2010; pp. 251–277. [Google Scholar]
- Moya-Anegón, F.; Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z.; Vargas-Quesada, B.; Corera-Álvarez, E.; Muñoz-Fernández, F.J.; González-Molina, A.; Herrero-Solana, V. Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach. Scientometrics 2007, 73, 53–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karino, M.E.; Felli, V.E. A Enfermagem baseada em evidências: Avanços e inovações em revisões sistemáticas. Cienc. Cuid. Saúde 2012, 11, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hagemann, M. Ten Years on, Researchers Embrace Open Access. Voices. Available online: https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/voices/ten-years-on-researchers-embrace-open-access (accessed on 18 August 2015).
- United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Global Open Access Portal. The Netherlands. Available online: http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/portals-and-platforms/goap/access-by-region/europe-and-north-america/netherlands/ (accessed on 20 September 2015).
- Dekker, S. Open Access to Publication. Available online: https://www.government.nl/documents/parliamentary-documents/2014/01/21/open-access-to-publications (accessed on 11 May 2014).
- Weitzel, S.R. As novas configurações do Acesso Aberto: Desafios e propostas. Rev. Eletron. Comun. Inf. Inov. Saúde 2014, 6, 65–75. [Google Scholar]
- Glänzel, W. National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics 2001, 51, 69–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Person, O.; Glänzel, W.; Dannell, R. Inflationary bibliometric values: the role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometics 2004, 60, 421–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ennas, G.; di Guardo, M.C. Features of top-rated gold open access journals: An analysis of the scopus database. J. Informetr. 2015, 9, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Miguel, S.; Tannuri de Oliveira, E.F.; Cabrini Grácio, M.C. Scientific Production on Open Access: A Worldwide Bibliometric Analysis in the Academic and Scientific Context. Publications 2016, 4, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4010001
Miguel S, Tannuri de Oliveira EF, Cabrini Grácio MC. Scientific Production on Open Access: A Worldwide Bibliometric Analysis in the Academic and Scientific Context. Publications. 2016; 4(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4010001
Chicago/Turabian StyleMiguel, Sandra, Ely Francina Tannuri de Oliveira, and Maria Cláudia Cabrini Grácio. 2016. "Scientific Production on Open Access: A Worldwide Bibliometric Analysis in the Academic and Scientific Context" Publications 4, no. 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4010001
APA StyleMiguel, S., Tannuri de Oliveira, E. F., & Cabrini Grácio, M. C. (2016). Scientific Production on Open Access: A Worldwide Bibliometric Analysis in the Academic and Scientific Context. Publications, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4010001