Next Article in Journal
Brief Motivational Interviewing in Dental Practice
Next Article in Special Issue
Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: An Evidence-Based Review
Previous Article in Journal
The Association between Tooth Loss and Alzheimer’s Disease: a Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Case Control Studies
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessCase Report

Comparison of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Radiographs Using Clinically Relevant Parameters

1
Department of Periodontology, Endodontology and Cariology, University Center for Dental Medicine, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
2
Department of Oral Surgery, Oral Radiology and Oral Medicine, University Center for Dental Medicine, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
3
Clinic of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Dent. J. 2019, 7(2), 50; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7020050
Received: 15 March 2019 / Revised: 17 April 2019 / Accepted: 22 April 2019 / Published: 1 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Imaging Science in Dentistry)
  |  
PDF [1257 KB, uploaded 1 May 2019]
  |  

Abstract

This work compared the assessment of clinically relevant parameters by two-dimensional, that is, full-mouth intraoral radiograph (I-O) and panoramic radiograph (OPT), and three-dimensional, that is, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), imaging methods. Different radiographic images (CBCT, I-O and OPT) were available for a 53-year-old female patient with dental and periodontal problems. A total of 14 dental and periodontal parameters were assessed by two independent examiners and compared among the three radiographic imaging modalities. For 10 parameters (71%), the CBCT images were superior to both I-O and OPT images. In contrast, CBCT demonstrated an inferior performance compared to I-O and OPT in the assessment of caries and dental restorations. Compared to OPT, I-O provided more clinically relevant findings for 10 out of 14 parameters (71%). Agreement between I-O and OPT was found with respect to dehiscence, fenestration, the number of bone walls and the root canal cross-section. Differences between the radiographic images were more likely to be detected when maxillary teeth rather than mandibular teeth were assessed with regard to furcation involvement, root proximity and root fusion. View Full-Text
Keywords: diagnosis; radiographs; cone beam computed tomography; full-mouth intraoral radiograph; panoramic radiograph diagnosis; radiographs; cone beam computed tomography; full-mouth intraoral radiograph; panoramic radiograph
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Schmidt, J.C.; Gutekunst, C.-J.; Dagassan-Berndt, D.; Schmidlin, P.R.; Walter, C. Comparison of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Radiographs Using Clinically Relevant Parameters. Dent. J. 2019, 7, 50.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Dent. J. EISSN 2304-6767 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top