Next Article in Journal
Restoration Strategies of Endodontically Treated Teeth among Dental Practitioners in Saudi Arabia. A Nationwide Pilot Survey
Previous Article in Journal
Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Myeloma Patients Receiving Denosumab or Zoledronic Acid. Comment on Pivotal Trial by Raje et al. Published on Lancet Oncology
Open AccessArticle

The Use of Orientation Templates and Free-Hand Implant Insertion in Artificial Mandibles—An Experimental Laboratory Examination in Fifth-Year Dental Students

1
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
2
Institute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Blasewitzer Str. 86, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Dent. J. 2018, 6(3), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj6030043
Received: 15 July 2018 / Revised: 15 August 2018 / Accepted: 29 August 2018 / Published: 1 September 2018
Implant dentistry is a growing field in the education of undergraduate dental students. The present laboratory study evaluates factors which may potentially influence the accuracy of free-hand implant insertion and the use of an orientation template. After three-dimensional planning using coDiagnostiXTM, orientation templates, including sleeves for the pilot-drill in regions 41 and 45, were manufactured by thermoforming. Sixty-one fifth year dental students inserted one implant using the orientation template and another implant free-hand in an artificial mandible. Information regarding age, sex, handedness, education, and the time required for implant insertion were recorded. Subsequently, the mandibles were scanned using cone-beam-computed tomography and the accuracy of the implant position was assessed, while statistical analysis followed. The free-hand implant insertion resulted in a distal deviation of −1.34 ± 5.15° and a mesial mismatch of 0.06 ± 0.79 mm at the artificial bone level compared to the sleeves. When using the orientation templates, the deviation decreased to −0.67 ± 3.48° and a distal mismatch of −0.22 ± 0.62 mm was achieved. The difference was statistically significant for the mismatch (p < 0.049). Regarding the limitations of our study, it could be said that the accuracy level achieved by dental undergraduates using implant placement with orientation templates is comparable to that in other studies. View Full-Text
Keywords: dental education; dental implants; free-hand implant insertion; orientation template; thermoforming dental education; dental implants; free-hand implant insertion; orientation template; thermoforming
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Schulz, M.C.; Rittmann, L.; Range, U.; Lauer, G.; Haim, D. The Use of Orientation Templates and Free-Hand Implant Insertion in Artificial Mandibles—An Experimental Laboratory Examination in Fifth-Year Dental Students. Dent. J. 2018, 6, 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj6030043

AMA Style

Schulz MC, Rittmann L, Range U, Lauer G, Haim D. The Use of Orientation Templates and Free-Hand Implant Insertion in Artificial Mandibles—An Experimental Laboratory Examination in Fifth-Year Dental Students. Dentistry Journal. 2018; 6(3):43. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj6030043

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schulz, Matthias C.; Rittmann, Lena; Range, Ursula; Lauer, Günter; Haim, Dominik. 2018. "The Use of Orientation Templates and Free-Hand Implant Insertion in Artificial Mandibles—An Experimental Laboratory Examination in Fifth-Year Dental Students" Dent. J. 6, no. 3: 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj6030043

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop