Next Article in Journal
Molecular Modelling of the Ni(II)-Responsive Synechocystis PCC 6803 Transcriptional Regulator InrS in the Metal Bound Form
Next Article in Special Issue
Self-Assembled Monolayers of Molybdenum Sulfide Clusters on Au Electrode as Hydrogen Evolution Catalyst for Solar Water Splitting
Previous Article in Journal
First Principles Study of the Vibrational and Thermal Properties of Sn-Based Type II Clathrates, CsxSn136 (0 ≤ x ≤ 24) and Rb24Ga24Sn112
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Inorganics
Volume 7
Issue 6
10.3390/inorganics7060075
inorganics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Iron Sulfide Materials: Catalysts for Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution

by
Dominikus Heift
Department of Chemistry, Durham University, Lower Mount Joy, South Rd, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
Inorganics 2019, 7(6), 75; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics7060075
Submission received: 25 May 2019 / Revised: 13 June 2019 / Accepted: 14 June 2019 / Published: 19 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inorganic Materials for Solar Energy Conversion)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The chemical challenge of economically splitting water into molecular hydrogen and oxygen requires continuous development of more efficient, less-toxic, and cheaper catalyst materials. This review article highlights the potential of iron sulfide-based nanomaterials as electrocatalysts for water-splitting and predominantly as catalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Besides new synthetic techniques leading to phase-pure iron sulfide nano objects and thin-films, the article reviews three new material classes: (a) FeS2-TiO2 hybrid structures; (b) iron sulfide-2D carbon support composites; and (c) metal-doped (e.g., cobalt and nickel) iron sulfide materials. In recent years, immense progress has been made in the development of these materials, which exhibit enormous potential as hydrogen evolution catalysts and may represent a genuine alternative to more traditional, noble metal-based catalysts. First developments in this comparably new research area are summarized in this article and discussed together with theoretical studies on hydrogen evolution reactions involving iron sulfide electrocatalysts.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

On our planet, atomic hydrogen H predominantly exists chemically bonded in natural molecules and products such as water, petroleum, and coal. In contrast, molecular hydrogen H2 does not occur naturally in large amounts on Earth and is only produced by certain microorganisms [1] in small quantities, which escape Earth’s gravity into the atmosphere due to the low molecular weight. Despite the low natural abundance of hydrogen gas H2 on Earth, it has indisputably been identified as a major energy carrier of the future as H2 has the highest gravimetric energy density of all known substances (lower heating value of ~120 kJ/g) [2], is non-poisonous and, most importantly, hydrogen gas can be derived from water. Using water, which is often termed as “the renewable fuel”, as a sustainable and abundant energy source has been a dream of novelists and scientists for a long time [3] and for several decades researchers of various disciplines have been working on energetically favorable and cheap processes to catalyze the decomposition reaction of water into clean molecular hydrogen and oxygen. The “Steam-Iron” process (3Fe + 4H2O → Fe3O4 + 4H2) is one of the oldest commercial methods for producing hydrogen from water and was practiced at the beginning of the 20th century to generate small quantities of pure hydrogen [4]. Remarkably, a recent study has found that traces of HS− in the process forming FeS on the iron catalyst surface, can significantly enhance the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) [5].
In general, the water-splitting process consists of two half-reactions: the water oxidation (oxygen evolution reaction, OER) and the water reduction (hydrogen evolution reaction, HER). Regardless of the pH of the solution, the voltage required for the splitting of H2O into H2 and ½ O2 is 1.23 V (25 °C, 1 atm). However, in reality one must apply voltages higher than the theoretical value of 1.23 V to achieve electrochemical water-splitting. This excess potential (overpotential, η) is required to overcome intrinsic activation barriers at the electrodes and solution resistance [6]. Consequently, an energy-efficient water-splitting system should have a low η value and much effort is made towards developing powerful electrode materials with low overpotential.
A key step in hydrogen gas formation from an aqueous solution is the reduction of H+ on a catalyst’s surface with an electron to form surface-adsorbed hydrogen. Subsequently, for the catalyst to be efficient, fast liberation of the hydrogen gas from the catalyst surface is essential. In this context, the free energy of hydrogen adsorption, ΔGH, is a significant measure for the catalytic activity of a hydrogen-evolving electrocatalyst [7]. Ideally, for a catalyst this energy (which must be invested to release molecular hydrogen from the catalyst surface) should be nearly zero. Such ideal ΔGH values are observed for elemental platinum and consequently, platinum-based materials have been found to be the most efficient hydrogen evolution catalysts [8]. Due to the high cost and low natural abundance of platinum in the Earth crust (3.7 × 10−6%), which is orders of magnitudes lower than that of non-precious metals such as Ni (0.0089%) or Fe (6.8%), much effort is devoted to find alternative, noble metal-free hydrogen evolution catalysts [6].
In recent years, significant progress has been made in developing innovative, less-expensive catalysts for HER whereby especially new nanomaterial-based catalysts exhibit remarkable HER efficiencies [9]. Inspired by natural photosynthesis, in which water and carbon dioxide are converted into molecular oxygen and carbohydrates, a significant research focus has been on the development of artificial photocatalysts, which could facilitate the light-driven generation of hydrogen from water. Significantly, also the biochemical processes taking place during photosynthesis in photosystems I and II are based on the redox chemistry of non-noble metals such as manganese and calcium or the Rieske iron sulfur protein, which contains a [2Fe-2S] cluster [9]. Other prominent examples from nature are hydrogenases, a group of metalloenzymes that catalyze the oxidation of H2 into protons and electrons as well as the reverse reaction, the generation of H2 [10]. Inspired by these enzymes, researchers also work on the development of molecular iron sulfur compounds to employ them as “artificial enzymes” in catalysis [11]. Even though significant progress is made in this research area, often such molecular species are prone to decomposition in solution.
Thus, in line with these systems, there has been a growing interest in the biosynthesis of related nanomaterials and the most extensive research has been focused on metal sulfides. For example, bacteria, fungi, or other microorganisms can convert sulfate into reduced sulfide species, which react with metal cations to generate metal sulfide structures [12]. However, typically during these processes it is difficult to control the purity and shape of the forming nanostructure.
Therefore, mimicking such biological processes and developing more sophisticated artificial synthetic procedures for transition metal oxide or sulfide nanostructures has been the aim of many research studies. In this context, in particular the development of transition metal dichalcogenide (TMDC) materials (MX2, M: e.g., Mo, Co, Fe, Ni; X = O, S, Se, Te) has attracted the attention of many research groups. Due to superior electrochemical performance, high stability in acid conditions and low fabrication costs TMDC materials exhibit excellent properties as water-splitting catalysts [13,14,15,16,17]. The performance of TMDC catalyst materials heavily depends on their electronic structure and to reach superior catalytic properties it is essential to pull down the Fermi level or decrease the band gap of the structures. Typical strategies to do this include doping of the TMDC lattice with impurity atoms or compounds and intentional creation of structural defects. Theoretical studies show that the performance of TMDC-based HER electrocatalysts severely depends on the hydrogen adsorption energy and that ΔGH is an indicator to predict the catalytic activity based on the materials’ electronic structure [18].
Due to the high natural abundance, very low cost and low toxicity of iron and sulfur, the TMDC FeS2 and other iron sulfide structures are very desirable catalyst materials. However, while iron sulfide structures have been thoroughly studied and have been shown to be good semiconductors for photovoltaic devices [14,19,20], iron sulfide-based catalysts for HER are much less developed. Compared to benchmark precious metal-free HER catalysts such as MoS2 [21] or transition metal phosphides [22], typically iron sulfide catalysts are less efficient and prone to corrosion. For example, a reactivity study on FexSy films shows their tendency to transform to oxidation products [23]. Thus, regarding the obvious benefits of iron sulfide materials there is an urgent need to develop more efficient and stable iron sulfide catalyst materials for HER. It is to be hoped that the stability of new iron sulfide catalysts can be increased through rational design of nanostructured materials and surfaces.
The chemistry of iron sulfides is very complex, with the formation of diverse iron sulfide phases such as FeS, Fe1−xS, FeS2, Fe3S4, etc. being very sensitive to factors such as temperature, pressure or pH, and is still not fully understood [24]. The recent discovery of an entirely new nanoparticulate iron sulfide phase, FeSnano, illustrates the complexity of the field. FeSnano contains tetrahedral iron sites and is balanced by monosulfide and polysulfide sulfur species, which together dramatically affect the stability and enhance the reactivity of FeSnano making it highly desirable as a potential catalyst material [25]. Moreover, FeSnano has been identified as a crucial precursor for the iron sulfide material mackinawite (FeS), a metastable intermediate structure, which itself can be a precursor to the formation of the more stable Fe3S4 and FeS2 phases. Due to the small size of constituent particles and highly disordered domains, mackinawite nanostructures can be highly reactive and therefore useful for the design of new catalyst materials [26].
In general, the fabrication of effective iron sulfide-based catalysts requires the synthesis of materials exhibiting defined iron sulfur ratios (phase purity) and well-defined shapes (spheres, cubes, wires, etc.) [27]. Regarding catalysis, both phase purity and morphology are of major significance for controlling and improving the performance of the catalyst material. The chemistry and syntheses of iron sulfide nanostructures [28] and thin-films [29,30], with their enormous potential for photovoltaic devices [31,32] and electrode materials [33] have been extensively reviewed in the literature. Therefore, the following article does not provide a comprehensive collection of research developments in this area, but rather highlights the latest milestones to spark the scientific communities’ interest for iron sulfide electrocatalysts. While the main focus is on iron sulfide-catalyzed HER, some examples of OER and iron sulfide-catalyzed overall water-splitting processes will be discussed. The first part of the article highlights new synthetic approaches to various iron sulfide nanostructures (e.g., FeS2, Fe3S4, etc.) and reflects how much their electrochemical activity depends on the structure and phase purity of the materials. In the next section, the concept of iron disulfide-doped titanium dioxide structures and the impact of FeS2-doping on the photocatalytic performance of TiO2 will be discussed. Furthermore, the review summarizes recent milestones in the area of iron sulfide-2D carbon nanomaterial hybrid HER catalysts and concludes with a few examples of metal-doped iron sulfide electrocatalysts. Appendix A of this review contains Table A1 of all discussed iron sulfide materials, summarizing experimental procedures and HER performance data.

2. Iron Sulfide Phases as Electrocatalysts

2.1. Iron Monosulfide, FeS

Recently Zhang and co-workers discovered the potential of iron monosulfide FeS as a low-cost pre-electrocatalyst for water-splitting [34]. Through treatment of an iron foam (IF) with thiourea under hydrothermal conditions they obtained FeS nanosheets, which grew on the iron foam. This material FeS@IF alone (just like FeS or IF) shows only very poor catalytic activity for HER. (In this article X@Y denotes material composites or core–shell particles consisting of two different phases X and Y, whereby X is covering the inner phase Y). Once “electrochemically activated” at the beginning of the electrolysis process, Fe@Fe oxysulfide nanoparticles are generated in situ on the FeS nanosheets. Remarkably, this Fe@FeOxSy material exhibits a high activity to catalyze both HER and OER simultaneously (Figure 1). At small current densities, the water-splitting output of Fe@FeOxSy is comparable with that of the benchmark system Pt/C-IrO2 and at larger current densities it exhibits even better outputs.
Air-stable FeS nanoparticles dispersed on Nafion films, invented by Giraud, Tard and co-workers [35,36], have attracted much attention for HER reactors. FeS nanoparticles are prepared by solvothermal decomposition of the single-source precursor Fe2S2(CO)6 at 230 °C in the presence of octylamine. Subsequently, vitreous carbon rotating disk electrodes are coated with the catalyst ink, which is prepared by dispersion of the FeS nanoparticles in Nafion. The system achieves HER electrocatalysis of neutral water at room temperature with a mild over potential, and no structural decomposition of the catalyst material or decrease in activity is observed for at least six days. A decrease in overpotential occurs during the first 24 h indicating a rise in hydrogen evolution activity, which is likely due to some modifications of the catalyst surface. Remarkably, with no particular storage care these electrodes were found to be stable for electrochemical studies for more than 6 months.

2.2. Iron Disulfide, FeS2

Iron disulfide (pyrite, FeS2) is the most prominent phase among the iron sulfides. Due to its unique properties (suitable band gap of E = 0.95 eV and extremely high absorption coefficient α > 105 cm−1) it has been extensively investigated as a photovoltaic semiconductor [19] and high-performance electrode material [37]. The physiochemical properties of FeS2 depend critically on its purity and shape; therefore, much effort has been devoted to controlling these factors. Various synthetic procedures for pyrite and applications of pyrite materials have been comprehensively reviewed in the literature [19,28,38,39]. These works show that a major challenge remains the access to single crystalline, high-purity FeS2 materials with a precise stoichiometric ratio, as Fe1−xS impurities are commonly observed in FeS2 structures. Structural defects coming along with these impurities (S vacancies and interstitial atoms) significantly diminish the photoelectric conversion efficiency of FeS2-based devices [28].

2.2.1. FeS2 Wires and Discs

Besides phase purity also the shape of FeS2 catalysts effects their performance and Ren, Leonard and co-workers demonstrate in a study how strong the HER activity indeed depends on the morphology of the nanomaterials. Following a hot-injection procedure and starting from FeI2, elemental sulfur and octadecylamine (which acts as reducing and capping agent), they describe the synthesis of low-dimensional, hyperthin 1D FeS2 wires, and 2D FeS2 discs. Notably, both FeS2 nanomaterials can be obtained following the same synthetic pathway by only changing the ratio of iron precursor and sulfur [40,41] (Figure 2A). The authors determined the exchange current density (a measure of kinetics for HER) of the 1D FeS2 wires and 2D FeS2 discs and remarkably, 2D FeS2 discs clearly exhibit the higher electrocatalytic activity for HER compared to 1D FeS2 wires and other tested FeS2 morphologies (Figure 2B). In fact, the electrochemical performance of the investigated 2D FeS2 discs is comparable to that of platinum in neutral pH conditions [40].

2.2.2. Mesoporous FeS2 Nanoparticles

The activity of any heterogeneous catalyst depends on its surface area, which should be as large as possible to reach maximum catalytic effects. In this context, mesoporous materials (materials containing pores with diameters between 2 nm and 50 nm) [42] have reached much attention. Suib and co-workers succeeded in synthesizing mesoporous FeS2 nanoparticles by sulfidation of iron oxide nanoparticles. In a first reaction step Fe2O3 nanoparticles are produced via an inverse micelle sol-gel method and then heated to 150 °C to yield a mesoporous Fe2O3 structure. Subsequently, this oxide substrate is converted with hydrogen sulfide and elemental sulfur into mesoporous FeS2 nanoparticles [43]. Theoretical calculations indicate that the exposed (201) facets of this mesoporous pyrite material are key for its excellent HER activity at pH 13 (low over potential of 96 mV (10 mA cm−2), Tafel slope of 78 mV dec−1).

2.2.3. FeS2/C Electrode Coating

While several studies found FeS2 electrocatalysts with significant HER activity, reports on FeS2 materials for OER or overall water-splitting are very limited. Li, Wang and co-workers published a rare example and demonstrated FeS2/C nanoparticles as efficient bifunctional catalysts for overall water-splitting [44]. These FeS2/C nanoparticles were prepared by suspending FeS2 nanoparticles (obtained in a hydrothermal process from FeCl3·(H2O)6 and diethy-dithio-carbamate trihydrate) and carbon powder in a water/ethanol mixture containing 5% Nafion. Immobilized on nickel foam, this FeS2/C electrode material can serve as electrocatalyst towards both OER and HER. For OER, excellent activity was obtained (240 mV overpotential at 10 mA cm−2), which is lower than that of IrO2 (~310–320 mV [45,46]). Similarly, and with nearly no activity loss after 1000 cycles, 202 mV at 10 mA cm−2 overpotential was measured for the hydrogen evolution. An overall water-splitting process with this FeS2/C electrode is achieved with 1.72 V at 10 mA cm−2.

2.2.4. FeS2 Thin-Films

Chi and Liu developed a combined physical vapor deposition (PVD) and thermal vapor sulfurization technique to produce FeS2 thin-films. In this process, Fe3S4 thin-films are deposited together with elemental sulfur in a tube furnace system and Fe3S4 is sulfurized and converted into pure FeS2 thin-films without any crystal phase incorporation [47]. Such traditional vapor deposition methods (chemical vapor deposition (CVD) or PVD) for thin-film substrates generally have limitations in film purity, roughness, and process controllability. In contrast, a new powerful technique, Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) facilitates access to high-quality and high-purity thin-film substrates [48]. ALD provides a layer-by-layer growth process of substrates enabling precise control of both film composition and thickness. In this way, Guo and Wang recently achieved the first ALD synthesis of FeS2 thin-films [49]. During the ALD process an iron amidinate precursor [iron-bis(N,N′-di-tert-butylacetamidinato)] is treated with a hydrogen sulfide plasma to generate well-crystallized, pyrite FeS2 thin-films (Figure 3). The so-produced pyrite (cubic lattice) FeS2 thin-films can contain traces of marcasite (orthorhombic FeS2 lattice). Noteworthy, this orthorhombic FeS2 structure has recently been reported by Hofmann and co-workers to enhance the photoresponse of cubic pyrite FeS2 films [50].

2.2.5. Resistance of FeS2 Catalysts to Sulfide Poisoning

Traditional HER electrocatalysts such as platinum materials or other transition metal structures are usually susceptible to poisons such as arsenide or sulfur resulting in a substantial decrease in catalytic activity [51]. To investigate the sulfide-resistance of FeS2 HER catalysts, the poisoning effect of sulfide on a FeS2 surface was examined by Chua and Pumera by linear sweep voltammetry [52]. Remarkably, the authors found that FeS2 electrocatalysts are extremely resistant to sulfide poisoning. The degradation effect of additional sulfide species on the FeS2 surface is not as severe as observed for platinum-based catalyst materials and results only in a slight increment of overpotential.

2.3. pH Dependence of Iron Sulfide Electrocatalysts

The performance of iron sulfide electrocatalysts does not only depend on the phase composition and morphology of the catalyst material, but also on the pH of the electrolyzed solution. Importantly, the pH range of a solution can change drastically during electrolysis processes. Since this effect is primarily observed directly at the electrodes on the catalyst surface, a locally high concentration of H+ or OH− ions can chemically change the phase composition of a catalyst. As an example, Holt, de Leeuw and co-workers observed a pH-dependent effect with greigite (Fe3S4) electrocatalysts [53]. During their studies on Fe3S4-catalyzed HER they observed a large increase of the pH at the electrode surface from pH 7 to pH 12. Fe3S4 is thermodynamically unstable under these basic conditions, being transformed to goethite (iron hydroxide) [24]. Consequently, iron hydroxide covers the electrode surface and must be considered to be a catalytic species for the HER process. Similarly, Giraud, Tard and co-workers monitored the pH dependence of a FeS2-catalyzed hydrogen evolution process [54]. The FeS2 nanoparticles used in this process (synthesized from FeCl3 and thiourea in a polyol process) show remarkable robustness and stability at very broad pH range (0.3–13). During this electrochemical reaction, at lower pH values a pH-dependent catalytic activity is observed, while above pH 5 the catalytic performance appears to be pH-independent. This observation indicates two entirely different electrochemical reaction mechanisms at low and high pH ranges, respectively.

2.4. HER Activity of Iron Sulfides in Comparison

Peron, Giraud, Tard, and co-workers carried out a detailed study to compare the performance of FeS2, Fe3S4 and Fe9S10 electrocatalysts for proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzers [35,55]. Electrochemical experiments led to the conclusion that FeS2 is more active for HER than Fe3S4, which itself is more active than Fe9S10. It has been ascertained in other studies on sulfide materials that a high density of sulfur atoms at the material surface and in particular the presence of disulfide S22− moieties causes a high catalytic activity (see [55] and references cited therein). A higher density of S22− active sites in FeS2 compared to Fe3S4 and Fe9S10 becomes obvious from the different sulfur-iron ratios changing in the order 2 (FeS2) > 1.33 (Fe3S4) > 1.11 (Fe9S10). Furthermore, in pyrite FeS2 the formal oxidation states of Fe+II and S−I as well as the structural motive Fe3−S−S−Fe3 (with S22− dumbbells connecting six iron centers) explain the high natural occurrence of S22− moieties in FeS2 [55]. The modest catalytic activity of Fe3S4 is also the subject of a theoretical study by Roldan and de Leeuw. The authors show that Fe3S4-catalyzed water dissociation is indeed thermodynamically unfavorable and molecular adsorption of water on the Fe3S4 surface is occurring instead [56].

3. FeS2-TiO2 Composite Materials

Titanium dioxide is a powerful photocatalyst (high photoactivity, non-toxic, chemically stable and inexpensive); however, due to its rather large band gap (3.2 eV for anatase TiO2 [57]) it only responds to UV (ultraviolet) light. The decoration of TiO2 nanomaterials with transition metal photocatalysts is a promising approach to extend the absorption of TiO2 to the visible and even infrared regions of the electromagnetic spectrum [58]. A potential candidate for this application is FeS2, which exhibits a large optical absorption coefficient (>105 cm−1) and a narrow band gap of 0.95 eV [59].
Lee and Kang followed this approach and verified that the loading of FeS2 nanoparticles on TiO2 enhances the production of hydrogen from methanol/water mixtures [60]. The authors performed cyclic voltammetric and UV-Vis spectrometric measurements and explain the superior photoactivity of FeS2/TiO2 hybrid catalysts compared to that of pure TiO2 with a smaller band gap of the former (2.89 eV for FeS2/TiO2 hybrid catalyst vs. 3.1 eV for TiO2). As a result, in FeS2/TiO2 catalysts electrons are more easily promoted from the valence band to the conduction band, resulting in a higher photocatalytic activity. Similarly, Kuo, Li, Lin, Wang and co-workers prepared FeS2-TiO2 nanocrystals, whose absorption range is even extended from the UV-visible to the near-infrared region [61]. As a part of this work, they studied the FeS2-TiO2-catalyzed HER from a 50% aqueous methanol solution and tested FeS2-TiO2 composites with different FeS2 loadings. Similar to the work by Lee and Kang, these FeS2-TiO2 heterostructures show remarkably enhanced hydrogen production rates in comparison with pure FeS2 nanoparticles and pure TiO2 (see Figure 4A). Figure 4B depicts a schematic action mechanism of the FeS2-TiO2 hybrid catalysts: when the material is irradiated with a broadband light source (covering UV, visible and IR (infrared) irradiation), photo-induced electrons are simultaneously promoted into the conduction bands of TiO2 and FeS2 by UV light and visible-NIR light, respectively. Subsequently, electron transfer occurs from the conduction band of FeS2 to that of TiO2, where protons are reduced to hydrogen. In this process it is the heterostructure between TiO2 nanoparticles and FeS2 nanocrystals which is key for the enhanced photocatalytic activity since it enables fast electron transfer from FeS2 to TiO2. Zhang and co-workers developed a comparable FeS2/TiO2 hybrid photocatalyst to use near-infrared light for photoelectrical water-splitting and demonstrate that TiO2 nanotubes decorated with infrared light responsive FeS2 exhibit excellent water-splitting performance under illumination of day light (Figure 4C) [62]. Under irradiation by solar light these FeS2/TiO2 nanotube catalysts cause a photocurrent enhancement, which is more than three orders of magnitude higher than that reached with pristine TiO2 nanotube electrodes under illumination of infrared light.

4. Iron Sulfide-2D Carbon Hybrid Materials

The deposition of catalyst components on a support material is a common strategy in heterogeneous catalysis, which helps minimize the agglomeration of the catalyst particles and hence increases the total catalytically active surface area. Particularly for the design of electrocatalysts the right choice of support material is of great significance to target catalyst composites with high electron transport capacity, which helps avoid recombination of photogenerated charge carriers to guarantee good electrocatalytic performance. In this context, 2D materials such as graphene, reduced graphene oxide, h-boron nitride, monolayer MS2 (M = Mo, W) or monolayer MoCh (Ch = Se, Te) [63] are commonly used support media for electrocatalysts. For instance, Chen, Lee et al. have shown that platinum nanoparticles supported on reduced graphene oxide exhibit a higher electrocatalytic activity and superior stability than bare platinum nanoparticles [64] and other studies reveal the high efficiency of Mo2C/rGO hybrid catalysts for hydrogen evolution [65]. The number of reported iron sulfide-carbon hybrid structures is surprisingly small and this section highlights the value of such materials for HER, with a focus on composites involving the 2D substrates Graphene (G), Graphene Oxide (GO) and reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) [66,67,68].

4.1. FeS2/rGO Hybrid Catalysts

Hu and co-workers report the synthesis of nano-FeS2-rGO, a material with FeS2 nanoparticles embedded in rGO, which has great potential as a high-performance electrocatalyst for HER [69]. Crucial is the high-temperature-assisted synthetic procedure delivering this nano-FeS2-rGO hybrid catalyst, which comprises the in situ synthesis of FeS2 nanoparticles from microscopic FeS2 powder in an rGO matrix (Figure 5). In the first reaction step microscopic FeS2 powder is obtained from bulk iron pyrite with a hammer and then mixed with GO, which has previously been exfoliated from graphite using an improved Hummers’ method [68,70]. Subsequently, the obtained micro-FeS2-rGO material is exposed to a thermal shock (2470 K, 12 ms) initiating the decomposition of FeS2 into Fe and S atoms, which diffuse between the rGO layers. As rapid cooling takes place, the Fe and S atoms renucleate around the defects of the rGO sheets to form FeS2 nanoparticles. The authors envisage that this synthetic strategy could also be applied to target other transition metal multicomponent composites. Nano-FeS2-rGO exhibits an excellent HER activity achieving 10 mA cm−2 at 139 mV overpotential. Importantly, the rGO matrix does not only act as a physical support for the pyrite nanoparticles, but (1) leads to an outstanding chemical stability of the pyrite particles under acidic conditions, (2) increases the electronic conductivity of the catalyst material and (3) hinders the loss of pyrite nanoparticles from the material during the water-splitting process [69].
A similar FeS2-rGO hybrid catalyst has been synthesized by Jiang and co-workers through a hydrothermal synthesis from rGO, Fe(NO3)3 and thioacetamide. This FeS2-rGO material consists of hexagonal FeS2 nanoclusters embedded in a lamellar rGO matrix and its electrochemical performance is superior to that of several iron-based catalysts [71]. The excellent electrical conductivity of rGO ensures a high electron transport capacity and small impedance (Rct = 7.94 Ω). Furthermore, the hybrid catalyst has a smaller Tafel slope (61 mV dec−1) than FeP nanosheets (67 mV dec−1) [72] or disk-shaped FeS2 nanoparticles (76 mV dec−1) [40].

4.2. MoS2 and Ni Doped FeS2/rGO Hybrid Catalysts

Taking the idea of FeS2-rGO composites a step further, Wang and co-workers have developed a three-tiered hybrid catalyst FeS2@MoS2/rGO [73]. This electrocatalyst is fabricated from FeCl3, phosphomolybdic acid hydrate and l-cysteine and exhibits excellent HER activities as well as outstanding electrochemical durability. The rGO sheets provide the catalyst with excellent electrical conductivity and lead to high dispersion of both MoS2 sheets and FeS2 particles guaranteeing a high abundance of active sites. Furthermore, rGO triggers strong interactions between the other two components MoS2 and FeS2 endowing the catalyst composite with a high mechanical stability. Besides MoS2 also nickel doping of iron sulfide-rGO composites can have a positive effect on the hydrogen evolution activity. Jiang, Han and co-workers studied different nickel-doped FeNixS2-rGO electrocatalysts (x = 0.05–0.3) and found that the incorporation of nickel into iron sulfide nanostructures yields electrocatalysts with lower Tafel slope, smaller electrochemical impedance and reduced overpotential [74].

4.3. Fe1−xS/GO Hybrid Catalyst

Non-stoichiometric Fe1−xS nanoparticles have been introduced into a sulfur-doped graphene oxide structure (S-GO) to produce nano–micro Fe1−xS@S-GO. This catalyst material was synthesized by a one-pot solvothermal approach in which aqueous solutions of FeCl3, GO, and thioacetamide are heated in an autoclave for 15 h at 200 °C [75]. Hereby, thioacetamide decomposes to the parent sulfide H2S, which firstly reacts with FeCl3 to form Fe1−xS nanoparticles and secondly converts GO to sulfur-doped GO (S-GO). The so-obtained Fe1−xS@S-GO hybrid catalyst was used as cathode material in a dye-sensitized solar cell and achieves a high solar-to-electrical conversion efficiency up to 7.23% [75]. The Fe1−xS@S-GO composite has not yet been tested for HER; however, Wang, Zhou, and co-workers highlight its potential for solar water-splitting.

4.4. Fe4S4/Graphene Hybrid Catalyst

To finish this section about iron sulfide-carbon hybrid catalysts, one example of a molecular iron sulfide compound immobilized on graphene shall be highlighted. Begum and co-workers report Fe4S4 cubane clusters on graphene as high-performance H2 evolution catalyst in acidic water [76]. [PPh4]2[Fe4(μ3-S)4(DMET)4] (A) (DMET = cis-1,2-dicarbomethoxyethylene dithiolate) was prepared from [PPh4]4[Fe2S12], dimethylacetylene dicarboxylate, and lithium sulfide. Subsequently, cluster compound A was ultrasonicated with functionalized graphene for 10 h under an argon atmosphere to yield A@graphene (Figure 6). A itself catalyzes the hydrogen evolution from tosylic acid (TON, 400); however, the hybrid catalyst A@graphene shows enhanced catalytic activity (TON, 3200) and higher stability in water compared to the naked complex A. Likely, the remarkable catalytic activity of A@graphene can be explained by continuous in situ reduction of A through the graphene support: A is oxidized during the proton reduction process and then immediately reduced by the graphene matrix, which acts as an external sacrificial electron donor. In extension to this work, research by Kanatzidis and co-workers shows that redox active Fe4S4 clusters incorporated in dye-functionalized gels are capable of producing hydrogen under photochemical conditions [77,78].

5. Metal Doping of Iron Sulfide Nanomaterials

It has been shown in the previous section how the right choice of support material can significantly enhance the activity of iron sulfide electrocatalysts. A different approach to further improve these materials for electrochemical applications is their combination with other metallic elements or metal compounds. Most notably, the incorporation of elemental cobalt or cobalt phases into iron sulfide structures delivers new materials with remarkable HER activity.

5.1. Cobalt-Doped FeS2 Structures

Huang, Luiso, Fedkiw and co-workers synthesized and investigated cobalt-doped iron sulfides FexCo1−xS2 (x = 0.98–0.32) on a carbon black support (Ketjenblack) and carried out a systematic study on the role of cobalt dopant for the hydrogen evolution activity of these materials [79]. Indeed, electrochemical measurements indicate a significant enhancement in HER activity of the Co-doped FeS2 structures in comparison to un-doped FeS2. Among the catalysts examined, Fe0.50Co0.50S2 (on HNO3 oxidized Ketjenblack) exhibited the highest HER activity. The overpotential necessary to reach a current density of 10 mA/cm2 was 150 mV (229 mV for un-doped FeS2) and only decreased by 1 mV after 500 catalytic cycles, indicating a long-term durability of the catalyst material in acidic environment.
A cobalt-doped iron pyrite catalyst with a phosphide surface modification (P/Co-FeS2) has been prepared by Chen, Wang and co-workers via solvothermal and chemical vapor deposition approaches [80]. In a hydrothermal process cobalt-doped iron oxide is grown on carbon fiber paper by reaction of iron nitrate and cobalt nitrate. This material is then treated with elemental sulfur at 450 °C to form the cobalt-doped iron pyrite structure Co-FeS2. Finally, annealing of this material with sodium hypophosphite results in the formation of P/Co-FeS2, a phosphide-modified nanocomposite of Co-FeS2. This catalyst material exhibits high HER activity with a low overpotential of 90 mV (at 100 mA cm−2) and a high durability in acidic solutions.
Cobalt-doped FeS2 nanosheets hybridized with carbon nanotubes (CNT) Fe1−xCoxS2/CNT also hold great potential for efficient HER in acidic solutions. Hwang, Chen, Dai, and co-workers report a scalable solvothermal synthesis of such Fe0.9Co0.1S2-CNT structures and performed DFT (density functional theory) calculations to elucidate the role of cobalt doping for HER activity [81]. The theoretical investigations showed that the reaction in acidic solution first proceeds via proton adsorption and reduction on the catalyst surface to form hydrogen atoms, which are adsorbed on catalyst edges. Subsequently, H2 is formed and finally released in a desorption step, which also occurs on the catalyst edges (Figure 7). Notably, sulfur atoms on the edge of the catalyst were found to be the HER active sites. Comparison of the kinetic energy barrier profiles of the Fe0.9Co0.1S2-CNT (Figure 7B top) and FeS2-CNT (Figure 7B bottom) catalyzed HER reveals a significant difference in the activation barrier of hydrogen atom adsorption leading to transition state 1 (TS1). In case of the Fe0.9Co0.1S2-CNT catalyzed HER, this energy barrier is 1.23 eV and significantly lower than that for the FeS2-CNT catalyst (1.62 eV). Most likely, this substantial difference (0.39 eV) explains the higher catalytic activity of Fe1−xCoxS2/CNT hybrid catalysts compared to that of FeS2-CNT composites.

5.2. FeS2-CoS2 Hybrid Structures

Xi and co-workers demonstrated that even overall water-splitting is possible with cobalt-doped pyrite FeS2 heterostructures. They developed FeS2/CoS2 interface nanosheets with abundant defects; a bifunctional electrocatalyst, which exhibits superior catalytic properties for both HER and OER in alkaline conditions [82]. A water-splitting device equipped with such FeS2/CoS2 electrodes requires at 25 °C only a voltage of 1.47 V to drive a current density of 10 mA cm−2. At elevated temperature (60 °C) the activity of the catalyst is even superior, and a lower voltage of 1.37 V is needed to afford the same current density. Remarkably, the performance of this FeS2/CoS2 catalyst is better than that of most reported non-noble metal overall water-splitting catalysts (see Figure 8). This example highlights the significance of interface engineering for developing highly efficient and stable water-splitting electrocatalysts.

5.3. Cobalt-Doped FeS2-CoS2 Hybrid Structures

Yan, Shi and co-workers merged the two concepts of cobalt doping and the hybridization of CoS2 and FeS2 pyrite structures (vide supra 5.1 and 5.2) to produce heterostructures of the type Co-FeS2/CoS2, which can be prepared from cobalt-doped FeS2 and CoS2. Benefitting from a three-dimensional hierarchical nanoarchitecture, which maximizes the exposure of accessible active sites, these Co-FeS2/CoS2 electrocatalysts exhibited excellent activity for hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions [83]. The materials’ distinctive nanostructure not only endows the catalyst with a large surface area, but also assists the release of hydrogen and oxygen from the electrode surface. The superior oxygen evolution performance of Co-FeS2/CoS2 heterostructures (278 mV overpotential at 10 mA cm−2 in 1 M KOH) is mainly explained by the presence of the CoS2 phase and its co-existence as heterostructure with Co-FeS2. The overpotential for HER in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution is 103 mV (10 mA cm−2) and both overpotential values of OER and HER change only marginally after 1000 catalytic cycles by 5 mV and 3 mV, respectively.

5.4. FeS2-Doped MoS2 Nanoflowers

Instead of doping iron disulfide with metals or metal compounds, FeS2 itself can be employed as dopant and be incorporated in trace levels into a guest crystal lattice. MoS2 nanomaterials are known to be efficient catalysts for hydrogen evolution [17] and to further enhance the HER efficiency of MoS2, Yang and co-workers have prepared MoS2 nanoflowers (predominately 1T-MoS2) and doped them with FeS2 [84]. Due to a unique morphology and electronic structure this FeS2-doped molybdenum sulfide material exhibits exceptional performance as HER electrocatalyst, which is superior to that of pure MoS2 and pure FeS2.

6. Conclusions and Outlook

The development of iron sulfide catalysts for electrochemical hydrogen evolution is a rapidly growing research field, of which selected milestones are summarized in this article. Even though iron sulfide electrocatalysts are still less developed and typically less effective HER catalysts than noble metal systems, numerous examples of well-designed iron sulfide materials exhibit surprising catalytic performance. In particular, the presence of disulfide moieties S22− causes a high catalytic HER activity and thus especially FeS2 materials are attractive electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution. Importantly, iron sulfide catalysts seem to be less prone to sulfide poisoning than noble metal catalysts. Composite materials of iron sulfide structures with 2D-carbon nanomaterials exhibit frequently better electrocatalytic performance and chemical robustness than pure iron sulfides. Comparably, doping of iron sulfide phases with other metals or other transition metal compounds delivers highly reactive HER catalysts. All in all, these examples show that the development of new iron sulfide containing electrocatalysts and further improvement of existing materials is urgently needed to exploit the maximum potential of a hitherto overlooked catalyst family for hydrogen evolution.

Funding

This research was funded by ERDF (COAST project), grant number 25R16P01359.

Acknowledgments

D.H. is thankful for fruitful discussions with P.W. Dyer and with all COAST team members.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Appendix A. Summary Table of Discussed Iron Sulfide Materials

Synthetic procedures for all discussed iron sulfide nanomaterials and specific characteristic data such as HER overpotential and Tafel slope (the slope of a curve of overpotential in Volts versus the logarithm of current density) are collected in this appendix of the review and provide a summary of their activity and performance as HER electrocatalysts. Importantly, quantitative comparison of the catalysts’ HER performance is a challenging task and care should be taken because of differences in the electrode preparation, the amount of employed catalyst material and the electrolyte (pH conditions).
Table
Table A1. Synthetic procedures and HER performance data (Tafel slope (mV dec−1), over potential η (mV)) for discussed iron sulfide materials.
Table A1. Synthetic procedures and HER performance data (Tafel slope (mV dec−1), over potential η (mV)) for discussed iron sulfide materials.
CatalystSynthetic ProcedureElectrolyteTafel Slopeη HER
(X mA cm−2)		Ref.
Iron sulfides
Fe@FeOxSyFeS nanosheets on iron foam1 M KOH77243 (100)[34]
FeS NPs on NafionDecomposition of Fe2S2(CO)6pH 7150~450 (0.71)[35]
FeS2 discs
FeS2 wires
FeS2 cubes		Hot-injection procedure with FeI2 and S8 in different rationspH 776
91
200		-[40]
FeS2/C NPsHydrothermal process from FeCl3·(H2O)6 and diethyl- dithio-carbamate trihydrate1 M KOH98202 (10)[44]
Mesoporous FeS2Conversion of mesoporous Fe2O3 with H2S and S8 into mesoporous FeS2pH 137896(10)[43]
FeS2 thin-filmsAtomic Layer Deposition---[49]
Cathode in PEM electrolyzer
FeS2/C
Fe3S4/C
Fe9S10/C		Polyol method from FeCl3 and thioureapH 7204
224
234		-[55]
pH dependence of FeS2-catalyzed HERPolyol method from FeCl3 and thioureapH-[54]
0.3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
11
13		85
127
170
290
306
340
287
280
274
329
192
FeS2-TiO2 materials
FeS2/TiO2 core–shell compositesDeposition of FeS2 NPs (solvothermal from FeCl3 and Na2S2O3) on nano-sized TiO2MeOH/H2O (1:1)--[60]
FeS2-TiO2 heterostructuresInjection of S8-oleylamine mixture in solution containing TiO2-octadecene and Fe-oleic acid precursorsMeOH
EtOH
H2O
Na2S aq.
Na2S/Na2SO3 solution		--[61]
FeS2 sensitized TiO2 nanotubesDeposition of FeS2 (from FeCl3 and thiourea) on TiO2 nanotubespH 7.4--[62]
Iron sulfide-2D carbon hybrid materials
nano-FeS2-rGOCurrent-induced high-temperature thermal shock process0.5 M H2SO466139 (10)[69]
FeS2-rGOHydrothermal reduction process0.5 M H2SO461226 (10)[71]
FeS2@MoS2/rGOAutoclave reaction of FeCl3, phosphomolybdic acid hydrate and l-cysteine0.5 M H2SO438.4123 (10)[73]
FeNi0.05S2-rGO
FeNi0.10S2-rGO
FeNi0.15S2-rGO
FeNi0.20S2-rGO
FeNi0.25S2-rGO
FeNi0.30S2-rGO		High-temperature hydrothermal method from GO, FeCl3, NiCl2, and thioacetamide0.5 M H2SO474.46
71.96
76.96
78.36
82.82
79.19		232
225
198
183
209
260 (10)		[74]
nano-micro Fe1−xS@S-GOAutoclave reaction of aqueous solutions of FeCl3, GO, and thioacetamide---[75]
[PPh4]2[Fe4(μ3-S)4(DMET)4]@grapheneUltrasonication of Fe4S4 cubane type cluster with functionalized graphenep-toluene sulfonic acid--[76]
Metal-doped iron sulfide materials
Fe0.50 Co0.50S2 on Ketjenblack oxidized with 10 N nitric acidChemical sulfurization of metal precursors using H2S0.5 M H2SO452150 (10)[79]
P/Co-FeS2Hydrothermal process of iron nitrate and cobalt nitrate followed by CVD treatment with S80.5 M H2SO441.590 (100)[80]
Fe0.9Co0.1S2/CNTSolvothermal approach0.5 M H2SO446120 (20)[81]
FeS2/CoS2 interface nanosheetsAnnealing of CoFe2O4 NPs with sulfur1 M KOH4478.2 (10)[82]
Co-FeS2/CoSHydrothermal process from FeSO4, Co(NO3)2, thiourea, and sulfur0.5 M H2SO456103 (10)[83]
FeS2-doped MoS2Autoclave process of Na2Mo4·2H2O, thiourea, and Fe3O4 microspheres0.5 M H2SO482136 (10)[84]

References

  1. Nandi, R.; Sengupta, S. Microbial production of hydrogen: An overview. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 1998, 24, 61–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Møller, K.T.; Jensen, T.R.; Akiba, E.; Li, H.W. Hydrogen—A sustainable energy carrier. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. 2017, 27, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ryabchuk, V.K.; Kuznetsov, V.N.; Emeline, A.V.; Artem’ev, Y.M.; Kataeva, G.V.; Horikoshi, S.; Serpone, N. Water Will Be the Coal of the Future-The Untamed Dream of Jules Verne for a Solar Fuel. Molecules 2016, 21, 1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hacker, V.; Fankhauser, R.; Faleschini, G.; Fuchs, H.; Friedrich, K.; Muhr, M.; Kordesch, K. Hydrogen production by steam–iron process. J. Power Sources 2000, 86, 531–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, Y.Q.; Jin, F.M.; Zeng, X.; Yao, G.D.; Jing, Z.Z. A novel method for producing hydrogen from water with Fe enhanced by HS− under mild hydrothermal conditions. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38, 760–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zou, X.X.; Zhang, Y. Noble metal-free hydrogen evolution catalysts for water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 5148–5180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kang, J.; Hwang, J.; Han, B. First-Principles Computational Screening of Highly Active Pyrites Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction through a Universal Relation with a Thermodynamic Variable. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 2107–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, L.; Doyle-Davis, K.; Sun, X.L. Pt-Based electrocatalysts with high atom utilization efficiency: From nanostructures to single atoms. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 492–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tachibana, Y.; Vayssieres, L.; Durrant, J.R. Artificial photosynthesis for solar water-splitting. Nat. Photonics 2012, 6, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lubitz, W.; Ogata, H.; Rüdiger, O.; Reijerse, E. Hydrogenases. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 4081–4148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Simmons, T.R.; Berggren, G.; Bacchi, M.; Fontecave, M.; Artero, V. Mimicking hydrogenases: From biomimetics to artificial enzymes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2014, 270, 127–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hosseini, M.R.; Sarvi, M.N. Recent achievements in the microbial synthesis of semiconductor metal sulfide nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2015, 40, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kong, D.; Cha, J.J.; Wang, H.; Lee, H.R.; Cui, Y. First-row transition metal dichalcogenide catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 3553–3558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fu, H. Environmentally friendly and earth-abundant colloidal chalcogenide nanocrystals for photovoltaic applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 414–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Faber, M.S.; Lukowski, M.A.; Ding, Q.; Kaiser, N.S.; Jin, S. Earth-Abundant Metal Pyrites (FeS2, CoS2, NiS2, and Their Alloys) for Highly Efficient Hydrogen Evolution and Polysulfide Reduction Electrocatalysis. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 21347–21356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gao, M.R.; Zheng, Y.R.; Jiang, J.; Yu, S.H. Pyrite-Type Nanomaterials for Advanced Electrocatalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 2194–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Zhu, J.X.; Yan, Q.Y.; Dou, S.X.; Sun, W.P. Nanostructured Metal Chalcogenides for Energy Storage and Electrocatalysis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, J.S.; Liu, J.; Zhang, B.; Ji, X.; Xu, K.; Chen, C.; Miao, L.; Jiang, J.J. The mechanism of hydrogen adsorption on transition metal dichalcogenides as hydrogen evolution reaction catalyst. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 10125–10132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Khalid, S.; Ahmed, E.; Khan, Y.; Riaz, K.N.; Malik, M.A. Nanocrystalline Pyrite for Photovoltaic Applications. Chemistryselect 2018, 3, 6488–6524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Bi, Y.; Yuan, Y.B.; Exstrom, C.L.; Darveau, S.A.; Huang, J.S. Air Stable, Photosensitive, Phase Pure Iron Pyrite Nanocrystal Thin Films for Photovoltaic Application. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 4953–4957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, G.; Liu, H.; Qu, J.; Li, J. Two-dimensional layered MoS2: Rational design, properties and electrochemical applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1190–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Su, J.Z.; Zhou, J.L.; Wang, L.; Liu, C.; Chen, Y.B. Synthesis and application of transition metal phosphides as electrocatalyst for water splitting. Sci. Bull. 2017, 62, 633–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Sosa, E.; Cabrera-Sierra, R.; Oropeza, M.T.; Gonzalez, I. Stability study of iron sulfide films, electrochemically grown on carbon steel, in different electrolytic media. Corrosion 2002, 58, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rickard, D.; Luther, G.W. Chemistry of Iron Sulfides. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 514–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Matamoros-Veloza, A.; Cespedes, O.; Johnson, B.R.G.; Stawski, T.M.; Terranova, U.; de Leeuw, N.H.; Benning, L.G. A highly reactive precursor in the iron sulfide system. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Matamoros-Veloza, A.; Stawski, T.M.; Benning, L.G. Nanoparticle Assembly Leads to Mackinawite Formation. Cryst. Growth Des. 2018, 18, 6757–6764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Heift, D.; Lacroix, L.-M.; Lecante, P.; Fazzini, P.-F.; Chaudret, B. Controlling the Sulfidation Process of Iron Nanoparticles: Accessing Iron−Iron Sulfide Core-Shell Structures. ChemNanoMat 2018, 4, 663–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Qin, H.; Jia, J.; Lin, L.; Ni, H.; Wang, M.; Meng, L. Pyrite FeS2 nanostructures: Synthesis, properties and applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2018, 236, 104–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Raturi, A.K.; Waita, S.; Aduda, B.; Nyangonda, T. Photoactive iron pyrite films for photoelectrochemical (PEC) cells. Renew. Energy 2000, 20, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Valand, T.; Burchardt, T.; van der Meer, S.F. The hydrogen evolution and corrosion of amorphous FeSx films. Corros. Sci. 2001, 43, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ennaoui, A.; Fiechter, S.; Pettenkofer, C.; Alonso-Vante, N.; Bueker, K.; Bronold, M.; Hoepfner, C.; Tributsch, H. Iron disulfide for solar energy conversion. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 1993, 29, 289–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dasbach, R.; Willeke, G.; Blenk, O. Iron sulfide for photovoltaics. MRS Bull. 1993, 18, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rui, X.; Tan, H.; Yan, Q. Nanostructured metal sulfides for energy storage. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 9889–9924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zou, X.; Wu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, D.; Li, W.; Gu, L.; Liu, H.; Wang, P.; Sun, L.; Zhang, Y. In Situ Generation of Bifunctional, Efficient Fe-Based Catalysts from Mackinawite Iron Sulfide for Water Splitting. Chem 2018, 4, 1139–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Di Giovanni, C.; Wang, W.-A.; Nowak, S.; Grenèche, J.-M.; Lecoq, H.; Mouton, L.; Giraud, M.; Tard, C. Bioinspired Iron Sulfide Nanoparticles for Cheap and Long-Lived Electrocatalytic Molecular Hydrogen Evolution in Neutral Water. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 681–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tard, C.; Giraud, M. Iron Sulfide Based Catalyst for Electrolytic Water Reduction into Hydrogen Gas. WO2014207156A1, 31 December 2014. [Google Scholar]
  37. Yersak, T.A.; Macpherson, H.A.; Kim, S.C.; Le, V.-D.; Kang, C.S.; Son, S.-B.; Kim, Y.-H.; Trevey, J.E.; Oh, K.H.; Stoldt, C.; et al. Solid State Enabled Reversible Four Electron Storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 2013, 3, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Murphy, R.; Strongin, D.R. Surface reactivity of pyrite and related sulfides. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2009, 64, 1–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Huerta-Flores, A.M.; Torres-Martinez, L.M.; Moctezuma, E.; Singh, A.P.; Wickman, B. Green synthesis of earth-abundant metal sulfides (FeS2, CuS, and NiS2) and their use as visible-light active photocatalysts for H2 generation and dye removal. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 11613–11626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jasion, D.; Barforoush, J.M.; Qiao, Q.; Zhu, Y.; Ren, S.; Leonard, K.C. Low-Dimensional Hyperthin FeS2 Nanostructures for Efficient and Stable Hydrogen Evolution Electrocatalysis. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 6653–6657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ren, S.; Leonard, K.C.; Barforoush, J.M.; Jasion, D. Low-dimensional Hyperthin FeS2 Nanostructures for Electrocatalysis. US20180222767A1, 9 August 2018. [Google Scholar]
  42. Rouquerol, J.; Avnir, D.; Fairbridge, C.W.; Everett, D.H.; Haynes, J.H.; Pernicone, N.; Ramsay, J.D.F.; Sing, K.S.W.; Unger, K.K. Recommendations for the Characterization of Porous Solids. Pure Appl. Chem. 1994, 66, 1739–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Miao, R.; Dutta, B.; Sahoo, S.; He, J.; Zhong, W.; Cetegen, S.A.; Jiang, T.; Alpay, S.P.; Suib, S.L. Mesoporous Iron Sulfide for Highly Efficient Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 13604–13607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, Z.; Xiao, M.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, D.; Wang, H.; Liu, X.; Wang, D.; Wang, W. Pyrite FeS2/C nanoparticles as an efficient bi-functional catalyst for overall water splitting. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 14917–14923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Anantharaj, S.; Karthik, P.E.; Kundu, S. Self-assembled IrO2 nanoparticles on a DNA scaffold with enhanced catalytic and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) activities. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 24463–24478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. McCrory, C.C.L.; Jung, S.H.; Peters, J.C.; Jaramillo, T.F. Benchmarking Heterogeneous Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 16977–16987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, H.F.; Chi, D.Z. Synthesis of iron sulfide and iron oxide nanocrystal thin films for green energy applications. Procedia Eng. 2016, 141, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dasgupta, N.P.; Meng, X.; Elam, J.W.; Martinson, A.B.F. Atomic Layer Deposition of Metal Sulfide Materials. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Guo, Z.; Wang, X. Atomic Layer Deposition of the Metal Pyrites FeS2, CoS2, and NiS2. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 5898–5902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wu, L.; Dzade, N.Y.; Gao, L.; Scanlon, D.O.; Öztürk, Z.; Hollingsworth, N.; Weckhuysen, B.M.; Hensen, E.J.M.; de Leeuw, N.H.; Hofmann, J.P. Enhanced Photoresponse of FeS2 Films: The Role of Marcasite–Pyrite Phase Junctions. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 9602–9607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Protopopoff, E.; Marcus, P. Poisoning of the Cathodic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction by Sulfur Chemisorbed on Platinum (110). J. Electrochem. Soc. 1988, 135, 3073–3075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chua, C.K.; Pumera, M. Susceptibility of FeS2 hydrogen evolution performance to sulfide poisoning. Electrochem. Commun. 2015, 58, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zakaria, S.N.A.; Hollingsworth, N.; Islam, H.U.; Roffey, A.; Santos-Carballal, D.; Roldan, A.; Bras, W.; Sankar, G.; Hogarth, G.; Holt, K.B.; et al. Insight into the Nature of Iron Sulfide Surfaces During the Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution and CO2 Reduction Reactions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 32078–32085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Villalba, M.; Peron, J.; Giraud, M.; Tard, C. pH-dependence on HER electrocatalytic activity of iron sulfide pyrite nanoparticles. Electrochem. Commun. 2018, 91, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Giovanni, C.D.; Reyes-Carmona, Á.; Coursier, A.; Nowak, S.; Grenèche, J.M.; Lecoq, H.; Mouton, L.; Rozière, J.; Jones, D.; Peron, J.; et al. Low-Cost Nanostructured Iron Sulfide Electrocatalysts for PEM Water Electrolysis. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 2626–2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Roldan, A.; de Leeuw, N.H. Catalytic water dissociation by greigite Fe3S4 surfaces: Density functional theory study. Proc. R. Soc. A 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Scanlon, D.O.; Dunnill, C.W.; Buckeridge, J.; Shevlin, S.A.; Logsdail, A.J.; Woodley, S.M.; Catlow, C.R.A.; Powell, M.J.; Palgrave, R.G.; Parkin, I.P.; et al. Band alignment of rutile and anatase TiO2. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 798–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Xu, H.; Ouyang, S.X.; Liu, L.Q.; Reunchan, P.; Umezawa, N.; Ye, J.H. Recent advances in TiO2-based photocatalysis. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 12642–12661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wan, D.; He, Q.; Zhang, L.; Jia, Q.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, H.; Wang, B.; Wei, L. Study on pyrite FeS2 films deposited on Si(100) substrate by synchrotron radiation surface x-ray diffraction method. J. Cryst. Growth 2004, 268, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lee, G.; Kang, M. Physicochemical properties of core/shell structured pyrite FeS2/anatase TiO2 composites and their photocatalytic hydrogen production performances. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2013, 13, 1482–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kuo, T.R.; Liao, H.J.; Chen, Y.T.; Wei, C.Y.; Chang, C.C.; Chen, Y.C.; Chang, Y.H.; Lin, J.C.; Lee, Y.C.; Wen, C.Y.; et al. Extended visible to near-infrared harvesting of earth-abundant FeS2-TiO2 heterostructures for highly active photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 1640–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Xin, Y.M.; Li, Z.Z.; Wu, W.L.; Fu, B.H.; Zhang, Z.H. Pyrite FeS2 Sensitized TiO2 Nanotube Photoanode for Boosting Near-Infrared Light Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 6659–6667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Meng, X.C.; Zhang, Z.S. Two dimensional graphitic materials for photoelectrocatalysis: A short review. Catal. Today 2018, 315, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Xu, G.R.; Hui, J.J.; Huang, T.; Chen, Y.; Lee, J.M. Platinum nanocuboids supported on reduced graphene oxide as efficient electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Power Sources 2015, 285, 393–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, S.N.; Liao, L.; Shi, Z.P.; Xiao, J.J.; Gao, Q.S.; Zhang, Y.H.; Liu, B.H.; Tang, Y. Mo2C/Reduced-Graphene-Oxide Nanocomposite: An Efficient Electrocatalyst for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Chemelectrochem 2016, 3, 2110–2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Johnson, D.W.; Dobson, B.P.; Coleman, K.S. A manufacturing perspective on graphene dispersions. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 20, 367–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Clancy, A.J.; Bayazit, M.K.; Hodge, S.A.; Skipper, N.T.; Howard, C.A.; Shaffer, M.S.P. Charged Carbon Nanomaterials: Redox Chemistries of Fullerenes, Carbon Nanotubes, and Graphenes. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 7363–7408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Zhu, Y.; Murali, S.; Cai, W.; Li, X.; Suk, J.W.; Potts, J.R.; Ruoff, R.S. Graphene and Graphene Oxide: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 3906–3924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chen, Y.N.; Xu, S.M.; Li, Y.C.; Jacob, R.J.; Kuang, Y.D.; Liu, B.Y.; Wang, Y.L.; Pastel, G.; Salamanca-Riba, L.G.; Zachariah, M.R.; et al. FeS2 Nanoparticles Embedded in Reduced Graphene Oxide toward Robust, High-Performance Electrocatalysts. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Marcano, D.C.; Kosynkin, D.V.; Berlin, J.M.; Sinitskii, A.; Sun, Z.; Slesarev, A.; Alemany, L.B.; Lu, W.; Tour, J.M. Improved Synthesis of Graphene Oxide. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 4806–4814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jiang, J.; Zhu, L.; Chen, H.; Sun, Y.; Qian, W.; Lin, H.; Han, S. Highly active and stable electrocatalysts of FeS2–reduced graphene oxide for hydrogen evolution. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 1422–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Xu, Y.; Wu, R.; Zhang, J.F.; Shi, Y.M.; Zhang, B. Anion-exchange synthesis of nanoporous FeP nanosheets as electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 6656–6658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Guo, Y.X.; Shang, C.S.; Zhang, X.Y.; Wang, E.K. Electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution using the MS2@MoS2/rGO (M = Fe or Ni) hybrid catalyst. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 11795–11798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Jiang, J.; Zhu, L.; Chen, H.; Sun, Y.; Lin, H.; Han, S. Effect of nickel-doped FeS2 nanoparticles-reduced graphene oxide electrocatalysts for efficient hydrogen evolution. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 775, 1293–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Li, Y.; Yin, J.; Chu, C.; Sui, N.; Shi, S.; Wei, J.; Di, F.; Guo, J.; Wang, C.; Xu, W.; et al. Earth-abundant Fe1−xS@S-doped graphene oxide nano–micro composites as high-performance cathode catalysts for green solar energy utilization: Fast interfacial electron exchange. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 4340–4347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Begum, A.; Sheikh, A.H.; Moula, G.; Sarkar, S. Fe4S4 Cubane Type Cluster Immobilized on a Graphene Support: A High Performance H2 Evolution Catalysis in Acidic Water. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yuhas, B.D.; Smeigh, A.L.; Samuel, A.P.S.; Shim, Y.; Bag, S.; Douvalis, A.P.; Wasielewski, M.R.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Biomimetic Multifunctional Porous Chalcogels as Solar Fuel Catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 7252–7255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Shim, Y.; Young, R.M.; Douvalis, A.P.; Dyar, S.M.; Yuhas, B.D.; Bakas, T.; Wasielewski, M.R.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Enhanced Photochemical Hydrogen Evolution from Fe4S4-Based Biomimetic Chalcogels Containing M2+ (M = Pt, Zn, Co, Ni, Sn) Centers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 13371–13380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Huang, S.Y.; Sodano, D.; Leonard, T.; Luiso, S.; Fedkiw, P.S. Cobalt-Doped Iron Sulfide as an Electrocatalyst for Hydrogen Evolution. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017, 164, F276–F282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Kuo, T.-R.; Chen, W.-T.; Liao, H.-J.; Yang, Y.-H.; Yen, H.-C.; Liao, T.-W.; Wen, C.-Y.; Lee, Y.-C.; Chen, C.-C.; Wang, D.-Y. Improving Hydrogen Evolution Activity of Earth-Abundant Cobalt-Doped Iron Pyrite Catalysts by Surface Modification with Phosphide. Small 2017, 13, 1603356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, D.Y.; Gong, M.; Chou, H.L.; Pan, C.J.; Chen, H.A.; Wu, Y.P.; Lin, M.C.; Guan, M.Y.; Yang, J.; Chen, C.W.; et al. Highly Active and Stable Hybrid Catalyst of Cobalt-Doped FeS2 Nanosheets-Carbon Nanotubes for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1587–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Li, Y.X.; Yin, J.; An, L.; Lu, M.; Sun, K.; Zhao, Y.Q.; Gao, D.Q.; Cheng, F.Y.; Xi, P.X. FeS2/CoS2 Interface Nanosheets as Efficient Bifunctional Electrocatalyst for Overall Water Splitting. Small 2018, 14, 1801070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wang, K.; Guo, W.L.; Yan, S.C.; Song, H.Z.; Shi, Y. Hierarchical Co-FeS2/CoS2 heterostructures as a superior bifunctional electrocatalyst. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 28684–28691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhao, X.; Ma, X.; Lu, Q.Q.; Li, Q.; Han, C.; Xing, Z.C.; Yang, X.R. FeS2-doped MoS2 nanoflower with the dominant 1T-MoS2 phase as an excellent electrocatalyst for high-performance hydrogen evolution. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 249, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Inorganics 07 00075 g001 550
Figure 1. FeS nanosheets grown on iron foam act as pre-catalyst for generation of Fe@FeOxSy, which is a highly active electrocatalyst and splits water simultaneously into molecular hydrogen and oxygen. Reprinted with permission from reference [34].
Figure 1. FeS nanosheets grown on iron foam act as pre-catalyst for generation of Fe@FeOxSy, which is a highly active electrocatalyst and splits water simultaneously into molecular hydrogen and oxygen. Reprinted with permission from reference [34].
Inorganics 07 00075 g001
Inorganics 07 00075 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) Schematic representations of 1D and 2D FeS2 structure formation. a: Fe nanoparticles (formed in the absence of sulfur), b: FeS2 wires (formed in a 1:6 Fe/S ratio reaction) and c: FeS2 discs (formed in a 1:24 Fe/S ratio). (B) Experimental linear sweep voltammograms at 1 mV/s for different FeS2 morphologies (solid lines) and the corresponding best-fit single-electron Butler-Volmer equations (dashed lines). Reprinted with permission from reference [40].
Figure 2. (A) Schematic representations of 1D and 2D FeS2 structure formation. a: Fe nanoparticles (formed in the absence of sulfur), b: FeS2 wires (formed in a 1:6 Fe/S ratio reaction) and c: FeS2 discs (formed in a 1:24 Fe/S ratio). (B) Experimental linear sweep voltammograms at 1 mV/s for different FeS2 morphologies (solid lines) and the corresponding best-fit single-electron Butler-Volmer equations (dashed lines). Reprinted with permission from reference [40].
Inorganics 07 00075 g002
Inorganics 07 00075 g003 550
Figure 3. Pyrite FeS2 thin-film production by Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) [49].
Figure 3. Pyrite FeS2 thin-film production by Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) [49].
Inorganics 07 00075 g003
Inorganics 07 00075 g004 550
Figure 4. (A) Hydrogen evolution rate of FeS2, TiO2 and FeS2-TiO2 heterostructures under a 300 W xenon lamp; (B) schematic illustration of the photo-induced charge transfer in FeS2-TiO2 heterostructures under UV, visible, and near-infrared light irradiation. (A) and (B) reprinted with permission from reference [61]; (C) TiO2 nanotubes doped with FeS2 exhibit high photoelectrochemical performance in the infrared light region, reprinted with permission from reference [62].
Figure 4. (A) Hydrogen evolution rate of FeS2, TiO2 and FeS2-TiO2 heterostructures under a 300 W xenon lamp; (B) schematic illustration of the photo-induced charge transfer in FeS2-TiO2 heterostructures under UV, visible, and near-infrared light irradiation. (A) and (B) reprinted with permission from reference [61]; (C) TiO2 nanotubes doped with FeS2 exhibit high photoelectrochemical performance in the infrared light region, reprinted with permission from reference [62].
Inorganics 07 00075 g004
Inorganics 07 00075 g005 550
Figure 5. Ultrafast transformation of microscopic FeS2 mineral into FeS2 nanoparticles: A thermal shock (2470 K, 12 ms) initiates the decomposition of FeS2 into Fe and S atoms. Subsequent recrystallization of Fe and S atoms at rGO defects delivers nano-FeS2-rGO. Reprinted with permission from reference [69].
Figure 5. Ultrafast transformation of microscopic FeS2 mineral into FeS2 nanoparticles: A thermal shock (2470 K, 12 ms) initiates the decomposition of FeS2 into Fe and S atoms. Subsequent recrystallization of Fe and S atoms at rGO defects delivers nano-FeS2-rGO. Reprinted with permission from reference [69].
Inorganics 07 00075 g005
Inorganics 07 00075 g006 550
Figure 6. H-bonding interactions in [PPh4]2[Fe4(μ3-S)4(DMET)4]@graphene. Reprinted with permission from reference [76].
Figure 6. H-bonding interactions in [PPh4]2[Fe4(μ3-S)4(DMET)4]@graphene. Reprinted with permission from reference [76].
Inorganics 07 00075 g006
Inorganics 07 00075 g007 550
Figure 7. (A) Schematic reaction of hydrogen evolution occurring on a sulfur atom of Fe0.9Co0.1S2. (B) Kinetic energy barrier profiles of HER on Fe0.9Co0.1S2-CNT (top) and FeS2-CNT (bottom) catalysts. Reprinted with permission from reference [81].
Figure 7. (A) Schematic reaction of hydrogen evolution occurring on a sulfur atom of Fe0.9Co0.1S2. (B) Kinetic energy barrier profiles of HER on Fe0.9Co0.1S2-CNT (top) and FeS2-CNT (bottom) catalysts. Reprinted with permission from reference [81].
Inorganics 07 00075 g007
Inorganics 07 00075 g008 550
Figure 8. Comparison of the voltage for FeS2/CoS2 interface nanosheets catalyst (red) with other reported non-noble metal overall water-splitting catalysts (at 10 mA cm−2). Reprinted with permission from reference [82].
Figure 8. Comparison of the voltage for FeS2/CoS2 interface nanosheets catalyst (red) with other reported non-noble metal overall water-splitting catalysts (at 10 mA cm−2). Reprinted with permission from reference [82].
Inorganics 07 00075 g008

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Heift, D. Iron Sulfide Materials: Catalysts for Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution. Inorganics 2019, 7, 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics7060075

AMA Style

Heift D. Iron Sulfide Materials: Catalysts for Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution. Inorganics. 2019; 7(6):75. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics7060075

Chicago/Turabian Style

Heift, Dominikus. 2019. "Iron Sulfide Materials: Catalysts for Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution" Inorganics 7, no. 6: 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics7060075

APA Style

Heift, D. (2019). Iron Sulfide Materials: Catalysts for Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution. Inorganics, 7(6), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics7060075

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop