Next Article in Journal
Effect of [Zr(α-PW11O39)2]10− Polyoxometalate on the Self-Assembly of Surfactant Molecules in Water Studied by Fluorescence and DOSY NMR Spectroscopy
Previous Article in Journal
Solvent and Substituent Effects on the Phosphine + CO2 Reaction
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Importance of Solvent Effects on the Mechanism of the Pfeiffer Effect
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Chirality Induction in Bioorganometallic Conjugates

by
Toshiyuki Moriuchi
1,*,
Satoshi D. Ohmura
2 and
Takayo Moriuchi-Kawakami
3
1
Division of Molecular Materials Science, Graduate School of Science, Osaka City University, 3-3-138 Sugimoto, Sumiyoshi-ku, Osaka 558-8585, Japan
2
Department of Natural Sciences, Graduate School of Technology, Industrial and Social Sciences, Tokushima University, 2-1 Minami-Josanjima, Tokushima 770-0814, Japan
3
Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Osaka Institute of Technology, 5-16-1 Omiya, Asahi, Osaka 535-8585, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inorganics 2018, 6(4), 111; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics6040111
Submission received: 12 September 2018 / Revised: 9 October 2018 / Accepted: 11 October 2018 / Published: 13 October 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chiral Metal Complexes)

Abstract

:
Considerable attention has been given to the research field of bioorganometallic chemistry, which is a hybrid chemistry field between biology and organometallic chemistry. The introduction of biomolecules, which have hydrogen bonding sites and chiral centers, into organometallic compounds is a promising strategy to construct chirality-organized bioorganometallic conjugates. This feature paper sketches an outline of induction of helical chirality into bioorganometallic conjugates by the control of a torsional twist of the organometallic moiety. Topics covered included control of the helical chirality of 1,n′-disubstituted ferrocene moieties in ferrocene-dipeptide conjugates, and the chirality induction of the Au(I)–Au(I) axis in the dinuclear organogold(I)-uracil conjugates.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Highly-organized structures as observed in proteins, enzymes, and DNA are created by self-assembling of biomolecules such as amino acids, peptides, and nucleobases, wherein hydrogen bonding [1] plays a crucial role in regulating and modulating the organized structures and functional properties. α-Helices, β-sheets, and β-turns, which are formed by complementary hydrogen bonding, are important secondary structures in protein folding [2,3]. The double helical DNA is formed by adenine-thymine and guanine-cytosine complementary base pairing based on hydrogen bonds [4]. In the last two decades, the research field of bioorganometallic chemistry, which is a hybrid chemistry between biology and organometallic chemistry, has been drawing much attention. A great deal of effort has been made on conjugation of organometallic compounds with biomolecules, such as amino acids, peptides, and nucleobases [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Ferrocene (Fc) is an organometallic compound with reversible redox properties and two rotatory coplanar cyclopentadienyl (Cp) rings (Figure 1) [16]. The inter-ring distance of about 3.3 Å in ferrocene is appropriate for hydrogen bonding between attached peptide strands on two Cp rings. In the 1,n′-disubstituted ferrocene, P- and M-helical conformations, which are interconvertible, based on the presence of a torsional twist about the Cp(centroid)–Fe–Cp(centroid) axis are possible as shown in Figure 2 [17]. The introduction of peptide strands, which have hydrogen bonding sites and chiral centers, into a ferrocene unit as an organometallic scaffold is envisioned to be a potential approach to study the hydrogen bonding ability of introduced peptide strands and construct chirality-organized bioorganometallic conjugates. On the other hand, a d10–d10 closed shell aurophilic bonding interaction are known to induce the aggregation of gold(I) compounds [18,19,20]. The presence of a torsional twist about the Au(I)–Au(I) axis allows for the existence of the conformational enantiomers in the dinuclear gold(I) compounds with bridging diphosphine ligands as depicted in Figure 3. Rational arrangement of nucleobases by using Au(I)–Au(I) interaction is a convenient approach to control the organized structure of molecular assemblies based on the directionality and specificity of hydrogen bonds.
In this feature paper, recent advances in induction of helical chirality into the organometallic moiety of bioorganometallic conjugates by the control of a torsional twist of the organometallic moiety are highlighted. Specifically, we focus on control of helical chirality of the 1,n′-disubstituted ferrocene moiety in the ferrocene-dipeptide conjugates. In addition, the chirality induction of the Au(I)–Au(I) axis in the dinuclear organogold(I)-uracil conjugates is briefly described.

2. Induction of Helical Chirality into Bioorganometallic Conjugates

2.1. Control of Helical Chirality of Ferrocene Moieties in Ferrocene-Dipeptide Conjugates

Ferrocenylalanine, which is the first example of the introduction of amino acid into a ferrocene unit, was synthesized in 1957 [21,22,23]. After its first example of a ferrocene-amino acid conjugate, much attention has been devoted to the design of ferrocene-amino acid or peptide conjugates to shed light on the factors affecting the formation of protein secondary structures and to construct highly-organized molecular assemblies [24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Ferrocene-1,1′-dicarboxylic acid (Fc-cc), 1′-aminoferrocene-1-carboxylic acid (Fc-ac), and 1,1′-diaminoferrocene (Fc-aa) scaffold are utilized as an organometallic scaffold with a central reverse-turn unit as pictured in Figure 4. The ferrocene-amino acid conjugate 1 composed of a valine unit was reported to reveal the capability of ferrocene-1,1′-dicarboxylic acid (Fc-cc) as a molecular scaffold for a regulated conformation through intramolecular antiparallel β-sheet-like hydrogen bonding (“Herrick” pattern) as depicted in Figure 5 [31]. The introduction of the l-Ala-l-Pro homochiral dipeptide chains into the Fc-cc scaffold induces P-helical chirality with P-1,2′ helical conformation of the ferrocenoyl moiety by restriction of a torsional twist about the Cp(centroid)-Fe-Cp(centroid) axis based on the chirality organization, through the formation of interchain intramolecular antiparallel β-sheet-like hydrogen bonds as observed in the ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 2 composed of the l-Ala-l-Pro-OEt dipeptide chains (Figure 6) [32,33,34,35]. As expected, M-helical chirality with M-1,5′ helical conformation of the ferrocenoyl moiety is formed in the ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 3 composed of the d-Ala-d-Pro-OEt dipeptide chains. Consequently, helical chirality of the ferrocenoyl moiety is easily controlled by changing the chirality of the introduced dipeptide chains (Figure 6). The ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 2 shows a positive Cotton effect at the absorbance region of the ferrocenoyl moiety based on P-helical chirality in the CD spectrum in acetonitrile and a negative Cotton effect is observed in the CD spectrum of the ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 3 with M-helical chirality as shown in Figure 7.
The ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 4 composed of the l-Ala-l-Phe-OMe dipeptide chains also forms the chirality-organized structure through the formation of interchain intramolecular antiparallel β-sheet-like hydrogen bonds to lead P-helical chirality with P-1,2′ helical conformation of the ferrocenoyl moiety as shown in Figure 8 [36]. P-Helical chirality with P-1,2′ helical conformation of the ferrocenoyl moiety can be induced in the ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 5 composed of the Gly-l-Leu-OMe dipeptide chains even though Gly, which is achiral, is used as the adjacent amino acid (Figure 8) [34]. The Gly-l-Pro-OEt dipeptide chains also allow the induction of P-helical chirality with P-1,2′ helical conformation of the ferrocenoyl moiety in the ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 6 composed of the Gly-l-Pro-OEt dipeptide chains (Figure 8) [37].
The formation of protein secondary structures can be controlled by changing the absolute configuration and sequence of amino acids. The simultaneous formation of an antiparallel β-sheet-like structure and a type II β-turn-like structure is achieved by conjugation of the Fc-cc scaffold as a central reverse-turn unit with the l-Ala-d-Pro heterochiral dipeptide sequence to induce P-helical chirality with P-1,2′ helical conformation of the ferrocenoyl moiety in the ferrocene-dipeptide conjugates 7 as depicted in Figure 9 [38]. The helical chirality of the ferrocenoyl moiety is likely to be induced depending on the absolute configuration of the α-carbon atom of an amino acid adjacent to the ferrocenoyl moiety [39,40]. On the other hand, the introduction of the l-Pro-l-Ala homochiral dipeptide chains into the Fc-cc scaffold induces the chirality-organized structure based on the formation of an antiparallel β-sheet-like structure with a concomitant formation of an inverse γ-turn-like structure as observed in the ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 8 (Figure 9) [41].
Cyclization of ferrocene-dipeptide conjugates to lead to the close proximity of the two peptide strands is a convenient approach to form a β-sheet structure. The cyclic ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 9 composed of the cyclic peptide (-Gly-l-Val-cystamine-l-Val-Gly-) forms intramolecular antiparallel β-sheet-like hydrogen bonds to induce P-helical chirality with P-1,2′ helical conformation of the ferrocenoyl moiety (Figure 10) [42].
In general, the helical chirality of the ferrocenoyl moiety in the ferrocene-dipeptide conjugates composed of the Fc-cc scaffold, depends on the absolute configuration of the α-carbon atom of an amino acid adjacent to the Fc-cc scaffold as described above. The helical chirality and protein secondary structures in ferrocene-dipeptide conjugates can be controlled by the regulation of the conformational flexibility of the dipeptide chains through cyclization of the dipeptide chains. Interestingly, the cyclic ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 10 composed of the heterochiral dipeptides (-l-Ala-d-Pro-cystamine-d-Pro-l-Ala-) shows M-helical chirality with M-1,4′ helical conformation of the ferrocenoyl moiety by the creation of a type II β-turn-like structure as pictured in Figure 11 [43]. On the contrary, P-helical chirality with P-1,2′ helical conformation of the ferrocenoyl moiety through the formation of an antiparallel β-sheet-like structure with a concomitant formation of an inverse γ-turn-like structure is observed in the cyclic ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 11 composed of the homochiral dipeptides (-l-Ala-l-Pro-cystamine-l-Pro-l-Ala-) (Figure 11) [43]. From these results, both P- and M-helical chirality can be induced by control of the absolute configuration of the remote amino acid without changing the absolute configuration of the adjacent amino acid in the cyclic ferrocene-dipeptide conjugates. Moreover, the conversion of M-helical chirality into P-helical chirality of the ferrocenoyl moiety can be controlld by the conversion of a type II β-turn-like structure to an antiparallel β-sheet-like structure. P-Helical chirality with P-1,2′ helical conformation of the ferrocenoyl moiety based on the chirality organization through the formation of an antiparallel β-sheet-like structure is observed in the acyclic ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 12 composed of the l-Ala-d-Pro-NHCH2CH2SH dipeptide chains, which is synthesized by the reductive cleavage of disulfide bonds in cyclic conjugate 10 as shown in Figure 11 [43]. The acyclic ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 13 composed of the l-Ala-l-Pro-NHCH2CH2SH dipeptide chains displays P-helical chirality with P-1,2′ helical conformation of the ferrocenoyl moiety, based on the chirality organization through the formation of an antiparallel β-sheet-like structure (Figure 11) [43].
The organometallic amino acid, 1′-aminoferrocene-1-carboxylic acid (Fc-ac), can be also utilized as a reliable molecular scaffold to allow the chirality-organized structure. P-Helical chirality with P-1,2′ helical conformation of the Fc-ac moiety through the formation of a 12-membered hydrogen-bonded ring is induced in the ferrocene-amino acid conjugate 14 (Boc-l-Ala-Fc-ac-l-Ala-l-Ala-OMe) as illustrated in Figure 12 [44]. The attachment of amino acids to 1,1′-diaminoferrocene (Fc-aa) as a molecular scaffold induces the chirality organization. An intramolecular 14-membered hydrogen-bonded ring is formed in the ferrocene-amino acid conjugate 15 composed of the l-Ala-Boc amino acids, resulting in P-helical chirality of the Fc-aa moiety (Figure 12) [45]. The ferrocene-amino acid conjugate 16 composed of only one l-Ala-Boc amino acid also forms the chirality-organized structure through intramolecular hydrogen bonds (Figure 12) [46]. The DFT studies accompanied with the data of CD measurements of the ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 17 (Ac-l-Ala-l-Pro-NH-Fc-NH-l-Pro-l-Ala-Boc) indicate P-helical chirality of the Fc-aa moiety (Figure 12) [47]. The formation of intramolecular 10-membered and 13-membered hydrogen-bonded rings induces P-helical chirality of the Fc-aa moiety in the ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 18 (Ac-d-Ala-l-Pro-NH-Fc-NH-l-Pro-d-Ala-Boc) (Figure 12) [47].
The ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 19 composed of the l-Ala-l-Pro-NH-2-PyMe dipeptide chains forms the chirality-organized structure with P-helical chirality of the ferrocenoyl moiety, through the formation of interchain intramolecular antiparallel β-sheet-like hydrogen bonds, wherein two C-terminal amido pyridyl moieties are well arranged for binding of dicarboxylic acids through hydrogen bonding (Figure 13) [48]. As a matter of fact, the ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 19 can form the 1:1 complex 20 with a series of dicarboxylic acids and serve as a receptor for the size-selective and chiral recognition of dicarboxylic acids (Figure 13) [48].
The reaction of the ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 21 composed of the l-Ala-l-Pro-NH-2-Py dipeptide chains with PdCl2(MeCN)2 affords the 1:1 trans-palladium complex 22, wherein the chirality-organized structure through the formation of an antiparallel β-sheet-like structure is stabilized in both solution and solid states (Figure 14) [49].
In the case of the ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 23 composed of only one l-Ala-l-Pro-OEt homochiral dipeptide chain, a left-handed helically ordered molecular arrangement, wherein two independent molecules are connected alternately to form an intermolecular hydrogen bonding network, is observed in the crystal packing as depicted in Figure 15a [33]. A left-handed helically ordered molecular arrangement through a network of intermolecular hydrogen bonds is also created in the ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 24 composed of only one l-Ala-d-Pro-NH-2-Py heterochiral dipeptide chain (Figure 15b) [38]. The utilization of the d-Ala-l-Pro-NH-2-Py heterochiral dipeptide chain leads to the formation of an opposite helically ordered molecular assembly; a right-handed helically ordered molecular arrangement in the crystal packing of the ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 25 composed of only one d-Ala-l-Pro-NH-2-Py heterochiral dipeptide chain as shown in Figure 15c [38].
The chirality-organized structure depends on the position of the pyridyl nitrogen of the C-terminal pyridyl moiety. In contrast to assembling properties of 24, an intramolecular type II β-turn-like hydrogen bond is created in the ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 26 composed of only one l-Ala-d-Pro-NH-4-Py heterochiral dipeptide chain (Figure 16) [50]. Assembling of the chirality-organized ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 26 with a β-turn-like structure is demonstrated by the reaction of 26 with 0.25 molar equivalent amount of [Pd(MeCN)4](BF4)2, giving the 4:1 palladium complex 27, where the four chirality-organized ferrocene-dipeptide conjugates are arranged in the same direction to form a chiral pocket as pictured in Figure 16 [50].

2.2. Chirality Induction of the Au(I)–Au(I) Axis in Dinuclear Organogold(I)-Uracil Conjugates

Gold(I) compounds can aggregate through a d10–d10 closed shell aurophilic bonding interaction, where the strength is comparable to the strength of a hydrogen bonding [18,19,20]. G-octamer formation of the organogold(I)-guanosine conjugates [51,52] and self-organization of the organogold(I)-uracil conjugate [53] were demonstrated to induce Au(I)–Au(I) interaction. Conversely, the utilization of Au(I)–Au(I) interaction is a promising strategy for preorganization of the self-assembling nucleobase moieties. The dinuclear organogold(I)-uracil conjugate 28 shows an intramolecular aurophilic Au(I)–Au(I) interaction by using Xantphos as a bridging diphosphine ligand for the arrangement of the phosphorus coordination site on the same side to induce intramolecular Au(I)–Au(I) interaction as shown in Figure 17 [54]. R- and S-enantiomers based on the presence of a torsional twist about the Au(I)–Au(I) axis are present in the crystal structure of 28 (Figure 17), wherein the hydrogen-bonded assembly through intermolecular hydrogen bonding between the uracil moieties is observed [54].
The utilization of the bridging diphosphine ligand with axial chirality induces chirality induction in the Au(I)–Au(I) axis. An intramolecular aurophilic Au(I)–Au(I) interaction is observed in the crystal structure of the dinuclear organogold(I)-uracil conjugate 29 with (R)-BINAP as a bridging diphosphine ligand, wherein 29 adopts a R,R-configuration through the chirality induction of the Au(I)–Au(I) axis as illustrated in Figure 18a [54]. In the crystal packing, a helical molecular assembly is formed by self-assembling through intermolecular hydrogen bonds between the uracil moieties (Figure 18b) [54].

3. Conclusions

In the bioorganemetallic ferrocene-dipeptide conjugates, the formation of protein secondary structures through intramolecular hydrogen bonding induces helical chirality of the 1,n′-disubstituted ferrocene moiety, wherein the formation of protein secondary structures can be altered by changing the absolute configuration and sequence of amino acids. The helical chirality of the ferrocenoyl moiety is also controlled by adjusting the conformational flexibility of the dipeptide chains through cyclization of the dipeptide chains. Chirality induction in the Au(I)–Au(I) axis of the dinuclear organogold(I)-uracil conjugate is demonstrated by using (R)-BINAP as a bridging diphosphine ligand for the arrangement of the phosphorus coordination site on the same side, to induce intramolecular Au(I)–Au(I) interaction. Directionality and specificity of hydrogen bonding play a crucial role in the construction of chirality-organized structures. In this sense, amino acids and peptides, which have hydrogen bonding sites and chiral centers, are promising to serve as chirality induction units through the formation of hydrogen bonds.

Author Contributions

Writing-Review & Editing, T.M., S.D.O., and T.M.-K.

Funding

This work was supported partly by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP16H01024 in Precisely Designed Catalysts with Customized Scaffolding and Grant Number 24108722 in Coordination Programming.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Toshikazu Hirao (Osaka University) and Mamoru Tobisu (Osaka University) for valuable discussion.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jeffrey, G.A. An Introduction to Hydrogen Bonding, 1st ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1997; ISBN 978-0-19-509549-4. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kyte, J. Structure in Protein Chemistry; Garland: New York, NY, USA, 1995; ISBN 978-0-81-533867-3. [Google Scholar]
  3. Branden, C.; Tooze, J. Introduction to Protein Structure, 2nd ed.; Garland: New York, NY, USA, 1998; ISBN 978-8-15-323050-5. [Google Scholar]
  4. Saenger, W. Principles of Nucleic Acid Structure; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1984; ISBN 978-1-4612-5190-3. [Google Scholar]
  5. Jaouen, G.; Vessiéres, A.; Butler, I.S. Bioorganometallic Chemistry: A Future Direction for Transition Metal Organometallic Chemistry? Acc. Chem. Res. 1993, 26, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Severin, R.; Bergs, R.; Beck, W. Bioorganometallic Chemistry—Transition Metal Complexes with α-Amino Acids and Peptides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1634–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fish, R.H.; Jaouen, G. Bioorganometallic Chemistry:  Structural Diversity of Organometallic Complexes with Bioligands and Molecular Recognition Studies of Several Supramolecular Hosts with Biomolecules, Alkali-Metal Ions, and Organometallic Pharmaceuticals. Organometallics 2003, 22, 2166–2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jaouen, G. Bioorganometallics: Biomolecules, Labeling, Medicine; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2006; ISBN 978-3-527-30990-0. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hartinger, C.G.; Dyson, P.J. Bioorganometallic Chemistry—From Teaching Paradigms to Medicinal Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hirao, T.; Moriuchi, T.; Groß, A. Bioconjugates to induce chirality organization. In Functionalized Redox Systems; Hirao, T., Ed.; Springer Japan: Tokyo, Japan, 2015; pp. 111–150. ISBN 978-4-431-55305-2. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kowalski, K. Ferrocenyl-Nucleobase Complexes: Synthesis, Chemistry and Applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2016, 317, 132–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Merlino, A. Interactions between Proteins and Ru Compounds of Medicinal Interest: A Structural Perspective. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2016, 326, 111–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Patra, M.; Gasser, G. The Medicinal Chemistry of Ferrocene and Its Derivatives. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017, 1, 0066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wenzel, M.; Casini, A. Mass Spectrometry as a Powerful Tool to Study Therapeutic Metallodrugs Speciation Mechanisms: Current Frontiers and Perspectives. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 352, 432–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Thota, S.; Rodrigues, D.A.; Crans, D.C.; Barreiro, E.J. Ru(II) Compounds: Next-Generation Anticancer Metallotherapeutics? J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 5805–5821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Togni, A.; Hayashi, T. Ferrocenes: Homogeneous Catalysis/Organic Synthesis/Materials Science; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1995; ISBN (print: 978-3-527-29048-2; online: 978-3-527-61559-9). [Google Scholar]
  17. Kirin, S.I.; Kraatz, H.-B.; Metzler-Nolte, N. Systematizing Structural Motifs and Nomenclature in 1,n′-Disubstituted Ferrocene Peptides. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35, 348–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Yam, V.W.-W.; Cheng, E.C.-C. Highlights on the Recent Advances in Gold Chemistry—A Photophysical Perspective. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1806–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Katz, M.J.; Sakai, K.; Leznoff, D.B. The Use of Aurophilic and Other Metal–Metal Interactions as Crystal Engineering Design Elements to Increase Structural Dimensionality. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1884–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Schmidbaur, H.; Schier, A. Aurophilic Interactions as a Subject of Current Research: An Up-Date. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 370–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Schlögl, K. Über Ferrocen-Aminosäuren und verwandte Verbindungen. Monatsh. Chem. 1957, 88, 601–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hauser, C.R.; Lindsay, J.K. Certain Alkylations with the Methiodide of N,N-Dimethylaminomethylferrocene. Synthesis of an α-Amino Acid Having the Ferrocene Group. J. Org. Chem. 1957, 22, 1246–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Osgerby, J.M.; Pauson, P.L. Ferrocene Derivatives. Part VI. dl-Ferrocenylalanine. J. Chem. Soc. 1958, 656–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Moriuchi, T.; Hirao, T. Highly Ordered Structures of Peptides by Using Molecular Scaffolds. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004, 33, 294–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Van Staveren, D.R.; Metzler-Nolte, N. Bioorganometallic Chemistry of Ferrocene. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 5931–5986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Moriuchi, T.; Hirao, T. Ferrocene-Peptide Bioconjugates. In Bioorganometallic Chemistry; Simonneaux, G., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2006; Volume 17, pp. 143–175, ISBN (print: 978-3-540-33047-9; online: 978-3-540-33049-3). [Google Scholar]
  27. Salmain, M.; Metzler-Nolte, N. Bioorganometallic Chemistry of Ferrocene. In Ferrocenes; Stepnicka, P., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2008; pp. 499–639, ISBN (print: 9780470035856; online: 9780470985663). [Google Scholar]
  28. Lataifeh, A.; Beheshti, S.; Kraatz, H.-B. Designer Peptides: Attempt to Control Peptide Structure by Exploiting Ferrocene as a Scaffold. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 3205–3218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Moriuchi, T.; Hirao, T. Design of Ferrocene-Dipeptide Bioorganometallic Conjugates to Induce Chirality-Organized Structures. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 1040–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Moriuchi, T.; Hirao, T. Dipeptide-Induced Chirality Organization. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2012, 74, 23–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Herrick, R.S.; Jarret, R.M.; Curran, T.P.; Dragoli, D.R.; Flaherty, M.B.; Lindyberg, S.E.; Slate, R.A.; Thornton, L.C. Ordered Conformations in Bis(amino acid) Derivatives of 1,1′-Ferrocenedicarboxylic Acid. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 5289–5292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nomoto, A.; Moriuchi, T.; Yamazaki, S.; Ogawa, A.; Hirao, T. A Highly Ordered Ferrocene System Regulated by Podand Peptide Chains. Chem. Commun. 1998, 1963–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Moriuchi, T.; Nomoto, A.; Yoshida, K.; Hirao, T. Characterization of Ferrocene Derivatives Bearing Podand Dipeptide Chains (-l-Ala-l-Pro-OR). J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 589, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Moriuchi, T.; Nomoto, A.; Yoshida, K.; Ogawa, A.; Hirao, T. Chirality Organization of Ferrocenes Bearing Podand Dipeptide Chains: Synthesis and Structural Characterization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Moriuchi, T.; Wu, H.; Tayano, Y.; Hirao, T. Structural Characterization of Chirality-Organized Ferrocene-Dipeptide Conjugates that Contain Pyridine N-Oxide Moieties. Asian. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 6, 1250–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Van Staveren, D.R.; Weyhermüller, T.; Metzler-Nolte, N. Organometallic β-Turn Mimetics. A Structural and Spectroscopic Study of Inter-Strand Hydrogen Bonding in Ferrocene and Cobaltocenium Conjugates of Amino Acids and Dipeptides. Dalton. Trans. 2003, 210–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Moriuchi, T.; Nomoto, A.; Yoshida, K.; Hirao, T. Intramolecular Conformational Control in Ferrocenes Bearing Podand Dipeptide Chains. Organometallics 2001, 20, 1008–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Moriuchi, T.; Nagai, T.; Hirao, T. Chirality Organization of Ferrocenes Bearing Dipeptide Chains of Heterochiral Sequence. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5265–5268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kirin, S.I.; Wissenbach, D.; Metzler-Nolte, N. Unsymmetrical 1,n′-Disubstituted Ferrocenoyl Peptides: Convenient One Pot Synthesis and Solution Structures by CD and NMR Spectroscopy. New J. Chem. 2005, 29, 1168–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Heinze, K.; Beckmann, M. Conformational Analysis of Chiral Ferrocene-Peptides. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 3450–3457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Moriuchi, T.; Nagai, T.; Hirao, T. Induction of γ-Turn-Like Structure in Ferrocene Bearing Dipeptide Chains via Conformational Control. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 31–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chowdhury, S.; Sanders, D.A.R.; Schatte, G.; Kraatz, H.-B. Discovery of a Pseudo β Barrel: Synthesis and Formation by Tiling of Ferrocene Cyclopeptides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 751–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Moriuchi, T.; Nishiyama, T.; Nobu, M.; Hirao, T. Control of Helical Chirality of Ferrocene-Dipeptide Conjugates by the Secondary Structure of Dipeptide Chains. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 12704–12708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Barišić, L.; Dropučić, M.; Rapić, V.; Pritzkow, H.; Kirin, S.I.; Metzler-Nolte, N. The First Oligopeptide Derivative of 1′-Aminoferrocene-1-Carboxylic Acid Shows Helical Chirality with Antiparallel Strands. Chem. Commun. 2004, 2004–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chowdhury, S.; Schatte, G.; Mahmoud, K.A.; Kraatz, H.-B. Amino Acid Conjugates of 1,1′-Diaminoferrocene. Synthesis and Chiral Organization. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 3018–3023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Djaković, S.; Siebler, D.; Semenčić, M.C.; Heinze, K.; Rapić, V. Spectroscopic and Theoretical Study of Asymmetric 1,1′-Diaminoferrocene Conjugates of α-Amino Acids. Organometallics 2008, 27, 1447–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kovačević, M.; Kodrin, I.; Roca, S.; Molčanov, K.; Shen, Y.; Adhikari, B.; Kraatz, H.-B.; Barišić, L. Helically Chiral Peptides That Contain Ferrocene-1,1′-Diamine Scaffolds as a Turn Inducer. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 10372–10395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Moriuchi, T.; Yoshida, K.; Hirao, T. Chirality-Organized Ferrocene Receptor Bearing Podand Dipeptide Chains (-l-Ala-l-Pro-NHPyMe) for the Selective Recognition of Dicarboxylic Acids. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4285–4288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Moriuchi, T.; Yoshida, K.; Hirao, T. Complexation Stabilized Conformational Regulation of Ferrocene Bearing Podand Dipeptide Chains (-l-Ala-l-Pro-NHPy). Organometallics 2001, 20, 3101–3105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Moriuchi, T.; Fujiwara, T.; Hirao, T. β-Turn-Structure-Assembled Palladium Complexes by Complexation-Induced Self-Organization of Ferrocene-Dipeptide Conjugates. Dalton Trans. 2009, 4286–4288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Meng, X.; Moriuchi, T.; Kawahata, M.; Yamaguchi, K.; Hirao, T. A G-Octamer Scaffold via Self-Assembly of a Guanosine-Based Au(I) Isonitrile Complex for Au(I)–Au(I) Interaction. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4682–4684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Meng, X.; Moriuchi, T.; Sakamoto, Y.; Kawahata, M.; Yamaguchi, K.; Hirao, T. La(OTf)3-Mediated Self-Organization of the Guanosine with an Alkynyl-Au(I)PPh3 Moiety to Induce Au(I)–Au(I) Interaction. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 4359–4363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sakamoto, Y.; Moriuchi, T.; Hirao, T. Organogold(I)-Uracil Conjugates: Synthesis and Structural Characterization. J. Organomet. Chem. 2015, 782, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sakamoto, Y.; Moriuchi, T.; Hirao, T. Dinuclear Organogold(I) Complexes Bearing Uracil Moieties: Chirality of Au(I)–Au(I) Axis and Self-Assembling. CrystEngComm 2015, 17, 3460–3467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Characteristic properties of ferrocene.
Figure 1. Characteristic properties of ferrocene.
Inorganics 06 00111 g001
Figure 2. (a) Top and side views of P- and M-helical chirality and (b) stereoisomers of the axial chirality of 1,n′-disubstituted ferrocenes. The broken line is the mirror plane.
Figure 2. (a) Top and side views of P- and M-helical chirality and (b) stereoisomers of the axial chirality of 1,n′-disubstituted ferrocenes. The broken line is the mirror plane.
Inorganics 06 00111 g002
Figure 3. R- and S-enantiomers of the dinuclear organogold(I) compounds with bridging diphosphine ligands. The broken line is the mirror plane.
Figure 3. R- and S-enantiomers of the dinuclear organogold(I) compounds with bridging diphosphine ligands. The broken line is the mirror plane.
Inorganics 06 00111 g003
Figure 4. Ferrocene-1,1′-dicarboxylic acid (Fc-cc), 1′-aminoferrocene-1-carboxylic acid (Fc-ac), and 1,1′-diaminoferrocene (Fc-aa) scaffold for the design of chirality-organized ferrocene-peptide conjugates.
Figure 4. Ferrocene-1,1′-dicarboxylic acid (Fc-cc), 1′-aminoferrocene-1-carboxylic acid (Fc-ac), and 1,1′-diaminoferrocene (Fc-aa) scaffold for the design of chirality-organized ferrocene-peptide conjugates.
Inorganics 06 00111 g004
Figure 5. Ferrocene-amino acid conjugate 1.
Figure 5. Ferrocene-amino acid conjugate 1.
Inorganics 06 00111 g005
Figure 6. Ferrocene-dipeptide conjugates 2 and 3.
Figure 6. Ferrocene-dipeptide conjugates 2 and 3.
Inorganics 06 00111 g006
Figure 7. CD spectra of 2 and 3 in acetonitrile (1.0 × 10−4 M).
Figure 7. CD spectra of 2 and 3 in acetonitrile (1.0 × 10−4 M).
Inorganics 06 00111 g007
Figure 8. Ferrocene-dipeptide conjugates 46.
Figure 8. Ferrocene-dipeptide conjugates 46.
Inorganics 06 00111 g008
Figure 9. Ferrocene-dipeptide conjugates 7 and 8.
Figure 9. Ferrocene-dipeptide conjugates 7 and 8.
Inorganics 06 00111 g009
Figure 10. Ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 9.
Figure 10. Ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 9.
Inorganics 06 00111 g010
Figure 11. Ferrocene-dipeptide conjugates 1013.
Figure 11. Ferrocene-dipeptide conjugates 1013.
Inorganics 06 00111 g011
Figure 12. Ferrocene-dipeptide conjugates 1418.
Figure 12. Ferrocene-dipeptide conjugates 1418.
Inorganics 06 00111 g012
Figure 13. Ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 19 and the 1:1 complex 20 with dicarboxylic acid.
Figure 13. Ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 19 and the 1:1 complex 20 with dicarboxylic acid.
Inorganics 06 00111 g013
Figure 14. Ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 21 and the 1:1 trans-palladium complex 22.
Figure 14. Ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 21 and the 1:1 trans-palladium complex 22.
Inorganics 06 00111 g014
Figure 15. A portion of a layer containing the helical assembly of crystal packing of the ferrocene-dipeptide conjugates (a) 23, (b) 24, and (c) 25 (hydrogen atoms, which are not involved in hydrogen bonding, are omitted for clarity).
Figure 15. A portion of a layer containing the helical assembly of crystal packing of the ferrocene-dipeptide conjugates (a) 23, (b) 24, and (c) 25 (hydrogen atoms, which are not involved in hydrogen bonding, are omitted for clarity).
Inorganics 06 00111 g015
Figure 16. Ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 26 and the 4:1 palladium complex 27.
Figure 16. Ferrocene-dipeptide conjugate 26 and the 4:1 palladium complex 27.
Inorganics 06 00111 g016
Figure 17. Crystal structures of the (a) R- and (b) S-enantiomers of the dinuclear organogold(I)-uracil conjugate 28 (hydrogen atoms and octyl moieties are omitted for clarity).
Figure 17. Crystal structures of the (a) R- and (b) S-enantiomers of the dinuclear organogold(I)-uracil conjugate 28 (hydrogen atoms and octyl moieties are omitted for clarity).
Inorganics 06 00111 g017
Figure 18. (a) Crystal structure of the R-enantiomer and (b) the helical molecular assembly through intermolecular hydrogen bonds between the uracil moieties of the dinuclear organogold(I)-uracil conjugate 29 (hydrogen atoms and octyl moieties are omitted for clarity).
Figure 18. (a) Crystal structure of the R-enantiomer and (b) the helical molecular assembly through intermolecular hydrogen bonds between the uracil moieties of the dinuclear organogold(I)-uracil conjugate 29 (hydrogen atoms and octyl moieties are omitted for clarity).
Inorganics 06 00111 g018

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moriuchi, T.; Ohmura, S.D.; Moriuchi-Kawakami, T. Chirality Induction in Bioorganometallic Conjugates. Inorganics 2018, 6, 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics6040111

AMA Style

Moriuchi T, Ohmura SD, Moriuchi-Kawakami T. Chirality Induction in Bioorganometallic Conjugates. Inorganics. 2018; 6(4):111. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics6040111

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moriuchi, Toshiyuki, Satoshi D. Ohmura, and Takayo Moriuchi-Kawakami. 2018. "Chirality Induction in Bioorganometallic Conjugates" Inorganics 6, no. 4: 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics6040111

APA Style

Moriuchi, T., Ohmura, S. D., & Moriuchi-Kawakami, T. (2018). Chirality Induction in Bioorganometallic Conjugates. Inorganics, 6(4), 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics6040111

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop