Next Article in Journal
Mesoporous C/CrN and C/VN Nanocomposites Obtained by One-Pot Soft-Templating Process
Next Article in Special Issue
Anion Ordering in Bichalcogenides
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
The Viscosity and Intermolecular Interaction of Organic and Inorganic Hybrid Systems Composed of Chiral Schiff Base Ni(II), Cu(II), and Zn(II) Complexes with Long Ligands, Azobenzene, and PMMA
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Inorganics
Volume 4
Issue 3
10.3390/inorganics4030021
inorganics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Silylation of Dinitrogen Catalyzed by Hydridodinitrogentris(Triphenylphosphine)Cobalt(I)

by
Wojciech I. Dzik
Van’t Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences (HIMS), Homogeneous, Supramolecular and Bio-Inspired Catalysis, Universiteit van Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94720, 1090 GS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Inorganics 2016, 4(3), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics4030021
Submission received: 14 April 2016 / Revised: 23 June 2016 / Accepted: 28 June 2016 / Published: 5 July 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Traversing the Boundaries of Inorganic Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Recently, homogeneous cobalt systems were reported to catalyze the reductive silylation of dinitrogen. In this study the investigations on the silylation of dinitrogen catalyzed by CoH(PPh3)3N2 are presented. We show that in the presence of the title compound, the reaction of N2 with trimethylsilylchloride and sodium yields, on average, 6.7 equivalents of tris(trimethylsilyl)amine per Co atom in THF (tetrahydrofuran). The aim was to elucidate whether the active catalyst is: (a) the [Co(PPh3)3N2]− anion formed after two-electron reduction of the title compound; or (b) a species formed via decomposition of CoH(PPh3)3N2 in the presence of the highly reactive substrates. Time profile, and IR and EPR spectroscopic investigations show instability of the pre-catalyst under the applied conditions which suggests that the catalytically active species is formed through in situ modification of the pre-catalyst.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Effective catalytic activation of dinitrogen under ambient conditions remains one of the biggest challenges in synthetic chemistry. Although such a transformation is feasible, as evidenced by the biosynthesis of ammonia enabled by nitrogenase enzymes [1,2,3,4], the activation of dinitrogen on transition metal complexes is not trivial and the best man-made homogeneous catalysts for ammonia synthesis can perform only several dozens of catalytic turnovers [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13].
In this context, most of the effort has been focused on molybdenum and iron systems [14,15,16,17,18]. Two major strategies for catalytic N2 activation by homogeneous systems were developed: reductive protonation to yield ammonia and reductive silylation to yield silylamines (Figure 1).
Catalytic formation of ammonia on well-defined systems was pioneered by the group of Schrock who developed a molybdenum-based system that catalyzed the formation of almost eight equivalents of NH3 per metal atom [19]. The group of Nishibayashi developed binuclear catalysts which were able to catalyze the formation of up to 63 equivalents of NH3 per Mo atom [20,21]. Iron also proved to be catalytically active as shown by the group of Peters, whose catalysts could produce up to 64 equivalents of NH3 at very low temperatures [22,23].
However, these catalysts suffer from poisoning with ammonia and dihydrogen formed as side products. This is usually not the case in catalytic silylation reactions and therefore this reaction generally yields more turnovers of N2 fixation (Figure 2). Catalytic reductive silylation of N2 was pioneered by Shiina who used CrCl3 as the pre-catalyst. This led to formation of 5.4 equivalents of N(SiMe3)3 when N2 was reacted with lithium and Me3SiCl [24]. Other salts of various metals yielded much less of the desired product. For instance, the use of CoCl2 which is relevant to the research presented here led to the formation of 1.2 equivalents of N(SiMe3)3 per metal centre. This chemistry was further developed for well-defined Mo and W systems by the groups of Hidai [25] and Nishibayashi [26]. Another well-defined molybdenum catalyst was recently disclosed by Mézailles and co-workers [27]. The group of Nishibayashi also reported that simple organometallic iron compounds can be used as pre-catalysts in this reaction and up to 34 equivalents of N(SiMe3)3 could be formed when a ferrocene derivative was used [28]. Interestingly, none of the studied iron compounds contain coordinated dinitrogen, and an approximately 1 h incubation period was observed, indicating that the catalytically active species is formed by reaction of the iron pre-catalyst with silylchlorides under reductive conditions. A two-coordinate iron(0) complex supported with a cyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbene ligand which revealed comparable activity was recently reported by Ung and Peters [29].
Despite the fact that cobalt-containing catalysts [30] are active in the Haber–Bosch reaction, only a handful of homogeneous systems based on this metal have been reported in the context of N2 activation. Yamamoto and co-workers showed that treatment of {[Co(PPh3)3N2]−}xMx+(THF)2+x (M = Li, Na, Mg) complexes with acids leads to the formation of ammonia and hydrazine in sub-stoichiometric quantities [31]. Peters and co-workers reported methylation and trimethylsilylation of dinitrogen bound to [(PhB(CH2PiPr2)3)CoN2]2Mg(THF)4 (Figure 3) [32]. Last year, Gagliardi, Lu and co-workers reported a dinuclear cobalt complex that catalyzes the formation of N(SiMe3)3 from dinitrogen with an impressive turnover number of 195 [33], while the group of Nishibayashi showed that in the presence of 2-2’-bipyridine, Co2(CO)8 can catalyze the formation of up to 49 equivalents of N(SiMe3)3 (Figure 2) [34]. Homogeneous cobalt complexes with tris(phosphine)borate ligands were also shown by Peters and co-workers to catalyze the formation of over two equivalents of ammonia [35].

2. Results and Discussion

Since Yamamoto’s [Co(PPh3)3N2]− complex promoted the reduction of the coordinated N2 in THF to ammonia and hydrazine, it seemed plausible that it could also promote the silylation of dinitrogen. Indeed, recently the group of Nishibayashi mentioned that CoH(PPh3)3N2 catalyzes the reductive silylation of N2 [34]. Given the fact that [Co(PPh3)3N2]− can be formed, e.g., by the reduction of CoH(PPh3)3N2 with alkali metals, we decided to investigate the activity of the cobalt triphenylphosphine system in silylation of N2 in more detail.
One could expect that [CoN2(PPh3)3]− should directly react with Me3SiCl, resulting in the formation of Si–N bonds, similarly to the dinuclear system reported by the groups of Gagliardi and Lu [33]. However, as shown by Nishibayashi, Yoshizawa and co-workers, many simple cobalt complexes reveal long incubation periods before the onset of the catalytic reaction [34]. We were thus interested in the mechanism behind the catalytic dinitrogen silylation by the cobalt triphenylphosphine system. Is [Co(PPh3)3N2]− the actual catalyst like the bimetallic Lu–Gagliardi complex or merely a pre-catalyst which undergoes a transformation into the catalytically active species through reaction with chlorosilane? To answer this question we started our investigations by studying the performance of the in-situ formed [Co(PPh3)3N2]− anion in the catalytic silylation of dinitrogen.
Treating a 0.0025 M solution of CoH(PPh3)3N2 in THF with 180 equivalents of Na and 190 equivalents of Me3SiCl led to the formation of 6.7 ± 1.0 equivalents (per Co atom) of N(SiMe3)3 as evidenced by GC. This corresponded to approximately 12% yield based on sodium (Table 1). The identity of N(SiMe3)3 was confirmed with mass spectrometry. Analysis of the ammonia content using indophenol method after saponification of the reaction mixture with 1 N H2SO4 was in accord with the GC analysis.
For comparison, we also investigated the behavior of cobalt compounds that do not have a coordinated dinitrogen molecule. The use of Co(acac)3 led to the substoichiometric formation of N(SiMe3)3, while the use of CoBr2 or Co powder did not result in the formation of N(SiMe3)3 (Table 1, entries 2–4). The use of cobaltocene led to the formation of N(SiMe3)3 in a slightly higher (but comparable) yield to the one obtained with CoH(PPh3)3N2 (entry 5). N(SiMe3)3 was not formed when no cobalt was present (entry 6). CoCl2(PPh3)2 which features the triphenylphosphine ligand had significantly lower activity (entry 7), while CoCl(PPh3)3 (which upon two-electron reduction under dinitrogen atmosphere could form [Co(PPh3)3N2]−) was less active than CoH(PPh3)3N2 (entry 8). The use of diethyl ether as a solvent led to a slightly lower yield of N(SiMe3)3, and in benzene no formation of this compound was detected (entries 9,10). No significant changes in yield were measured when the amount of solvent varied (entries 11,12). The use of lithium as the reductant led to a comparable yield, while for potassium no desired product was formed (entries 13,14). Potassium gave good results with other systems [26] and the failure to obtain the desired product with this reductant is likely caused by a very fast reaction of potassium (disappearance of all solids within less than an hour) with all Me3SiCl before the catalytically active species could be formed (see below). The use of potassium graphite instead of metallic potassium led to the formation of 3.5 equivalents of N(SiMe3)3. The exact reason why Me3SiCl is consumed in unproductive reaction with metallic K at higher rates than with metallic Li or Na or KC8 is currently not clear but remains outside of the scope of this work. For an example of a somewhat related low performance of metallic K compared to Na and KC8 in reductive coupling of alkyl chlorides see e.g., [36].
Overall, CoH(PPh3)3N2 showed a rather moderate activity, and although it performed better than its non-dinitrogen-containing analogs CoCl(PPh3)3 and CoCl2(PPh3)2, it was still less effective than cobaltocene. Next, we undertook mechanistic studies of its catalytic activity, and attempted to detect any possible cobalt intermediates in the trimethylsilylation reaction. The time profile of the formation of N(SiMe3)3 reveals an induction period of ca. 4 h followed by a period of moderate activity (ca. 16 h) during which all the sodium is consumed (Figure 4). A somewhat shorter (1 h) induction period was reported by the group of Nishibayashi for the organometallic cobalt systems. This induction period was proposed to account for the formation of catalytically active species that features trimethylsilyl groups directly bound to the cobalt center [34].
We attempted to shed light on the possible initial transformations of CoH(PPh3)3N2 using IR spectroscopy. Yamamoto et al. reported that the reduction of CoH(PPh3)3N2 with sodium results in the formation of [Co(PPh3)3N2]Na(THF)3 [31]. Indeed, the addition of five equivalents of Na to a THF solution of CoH(PPh3)3N2 resulted in the disappearance of its characteristic N≡N stretch vibration at 2091 cm−1 and the appearance of a new peak at 1912 cm−1 attributable to [Co(PPh3)3N2]Na(THF)3. When three equivalents of Me3SiCl were added to a solution of CoH(PPh3)3N2 in THF, the disappearance of the IR signal corresponding to the cobalt-dinitrogen complex was observed within 20 min and no peaks attributable to a reduced N2 moiety could be observed. When the addition of Me3SiCl was performed in the presence of metallic sodium, the disappearance of the signal of CoH(PPh3)3N2 was retarded, suggesting a possible concurrent reaction of Me3SiCl with sodium. Still, however, it seemed plausible that the attack of Me3SiCl on [Co(PPh3)3N2]− would lead to the formation of the active catalyst. Therefore, we investigated whether the reaction of pre-formed [Co(PPh3)3N2]Na(THF)3 with six equivalents of trimethylchlorosilane would lead to the formation of N(SiMe3)3. GC-MS analysis of this reaction mixture did not reveal the formation of either N(SiMe3)3 or any organic compound containing an N–SiMe3 moiety. The subsequent addition of 180 equivalents of sodium and Me3SiCl to the reaction mixture resulted in the formation of N(SiMe3)3, albeit an induction period still was observed.
Since in the first several hours of reaction no formation of N(SiMe3)3 is observed, and the stoichiometric reaction of Me3SiCl with [Co(PPh3)3N2]− does not lead to the formation of N–Si bonds, it seemed rather unlikely that the catalytic reaction proceeds on CoH(PPh3)3N2 (or [Co(PPh3)3N2]Na(THF)3). Indeed, IR spectroscopy analysis of an aliquot of a catalytically active mixture taken after 8 h of reaction revealed no peaks that could be assigned to any Co–N2 species. This suggests that after the induction period, virtually all CoH(PPh3)3N2 is decomposed and the bulk of the cobalt is not coordinated with a terminally bound N2.
The majority of the coordination compounds of cobalt are paramagnetic, therefore we used EPR spectroscopy to probe the catalytic reaction mixture. Investigation of the reaction mixture after 3.5 h, i.e., before the onset of the formation of N(SiMe3)3, revealed the presence of a strong signal (Figure 5, red line) with clearly visible hyperfine couplings with the cobalt center and a very strong and broad signal spanning through the whole measurement window. Its spectral features (gx = 2.13; gy = 2.12; gz = 2.02; Ax = 215; Ay = 195; Az = 180 MHz) are indicative of a low-spin cobalt(II) species [35,37,38]. This species corresponded to approximately 8% of the total cobalt concentration. The amount of paramagnetic material was calculated from double integrals of the EPR signal of the catalytic reaction mixture and of a solution of Cobalt(II) meso-tetraphenylporphine used as the external standard (see Figure S1 in the supplementary materials). An aliquot from the reaction mixture taken after 48 h revealed the presence of the same paramagnetic species (with less resolved hyperfine structure, due to the lack of formation of good glass upon freezing) corresponding to approximately 5% of the total cobalt concentration (Figure 5, blue line). These data suggest that during the reaction of the CoH(PPh3)3N2 with Me3SiCl in THF, a small amount of paramagnetic cobalt(II) species is formed which is not a catalytic intermediate in the N2 fixation reaction. This species can be formed, e.g., by a transfer of a chloro radical from Me3SiCl to the cobalt(I) center, or by the attack of the trimethylsilyl radical formed after a one-electron reduction of Me3SiCl. Formation of other cobalt species which could not be easily identified either using IR or EPR spectroscopy cannot be excluded; however, the reduction of the pre-catalyst to metallic cobalt has not been observed during the reaction.
Monitoring of the catalytic reaction with 31P NMR did not reveal any substantial signal of triphenylphosphine during the incubation period, and only after two days the signal at −6.5 ppm corresponding to free triphenylphosphine was observed, constituting less than 10% of the initial amount of CoH(PPh3)3N2 (triphenylphosphine oxide added after the reaction stopped was used as an internal standard). This points to the possibility that triphenylphosphine remains bound to cobalt during catalysis; however, a fast exchange of triphenylphosphines on the cobalt center can also account for the lack of NMR signal.
To investigate whether cobalt nanoparticles are the active species, we analyzed the supernatant of the reaction mixture for the presence of nanoparticles using dynamic light scattering (DLS) after the formation of N(SiMe3)3 reached plateau. Measurements of the clear, brown solution obtained after sedimentation of the insoluble material formed during the catalytic reaction revealed a bimodal distribution of particles with an average size of 20 and 100 nm (see Figures S2 and S3 in the supplementary materials). This solution was, however, no longer active in the silylation of N2 when additional sodium and Me3SiCl were added. This suggests that even if cobalt nanoparticles are formed, they are an unlikely catalyst for the title reaction.
From the above results it is clear that neither CoH(PPh3)3N2 nor its reduction product [Co(PPh3)3N2]Na(THF)3 activate N2 towards the formation of N–Si bonds. Dinitrogen complexes of cobalt(II) are known [39]; however, it is unlikely that the observed paramagnetic complex is the active species given that it is already present in the reaction mixture before the onset of N(TMS)3 formation is reached. It is possible that this species is being transformed into the actual catalyst during the incubation period. Since good molecular catalysts for the silylation of dinitrogen can reach over 200 turnovers [25,33], it is plausible that the actual very active catalyst is present only in minute amounts, which prevents its spectroscopic characterization. Based on the work of Nishibayashi, Yoshizawa and co-workers, an in-situ formed metallosilane species [28,34] can be responsible for the catalytic activity of CoH(PPh3)3N2.

3. Materials and Methods

All manipulations were performed using Schlenk techniques under nitrogen or in a nitrogen-filled glovebox. CoH(PPh3)3N2 was synthesized from Co(acac)3 (99.99% trace metal basis, Sigma-Aldrich, (St. Louis, MO, USA) (acac = acetylacetonato) as reported previously [40]. CoCl(PPh3)3 [41] and CoCl2(PPh3)2 [42] were synthesized according to published procedures. THF and Et2O were distilled from sodium wire/benzoquinone, benzene and pentane was distilled from sodium wire. Me3SiCl (99%, purified by redestillation) was degassed using freeze-pump-thaw method (three cycles) and stored under nitrogen. Solvents used for catalytic runs were degassed using freeze-pump-thaw method (three cycles) immediately before use. GC measurements were performed on a Shimadzu GC-17A Gas Chromatograph (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) with a Supelco SPB-1 fused silica capillary column. X-band EPR measurements were performed on a Bruker EMX spectrometer equipped with a He temperature control cryostat system (Oxford Instruments, Tubney Woods, UK). DLS measurements were performed on an ALV/LSE 5003 electronics and multiple Tau digital correlator (ALV-Laser Vertriebsgesellschaft m-b.H, Langen, Germany).
General procedure for catalytic silylation of dinitrogen: 320 mg of sodium (30%–35% in mineral oil, 4.5 mmol) was placed in a 100 mL Schlenk flask equipped with a glass stirring bar. Sodium was washed three times with 5 mL of pentane and a 22 mg (0.025 mmol) amount of CoH(PPh3)3N2 was added followed by 10 mL of THF. The solution was vigorously stirred and 0.6 mL (4.7 mmol) of Me3SiCl was added with syringe. The initially orange-brown mixture turned gray/black after several hours of stirring. After 48 h, 10 μL of decane as an internal standard was added with a micropipette, and the mixture was centrifuged giving a purple precipitate and green-brown supernatant which was used for analysis of the amount of fixed nitrogen.

4. Conclusions

The cobalt-dinitrogen complex CoH(PPh3)3N2 is a pre-catalyst in the reductive silylation of the dinitrogen reaction. This complex itself does not mediate the formation of N–Si bonds; however, under the applied catalytic conditions it transforms to the active species after approximately 4 h. Spectroscopic analysis of the reaction mixture did not reveal the presence of a resting state with a terminally bound N2, and the nanoparticles formed during the course of the reaction are not catalytically active. It is therefore likely that in-situ formed homogeneous cobaltosilane species proposed by Nishibayashi, Yoshiawa and co-workers are responsible for the catalytic activity. Further studies should aim at an unambiguous determination of the structure of the catalytically active species generated from this mononuclear cobalt precursor.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/2304-6740/4/3/21/s1, Figure S1. Double integrals of the EPR signal of a 1.28 mM THF solution of cobalt (II) meso-tetraphenylporphine, and of the catalytic reaction mixture measured after 3.5 and 48 h. Figure S2. DLS normalized intensity correlation function. Figure S3. Size distribution of nanoparticles measured with DLS.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO-CW, VENI grant 722.013.002) for funding, Mr. Christophe Rebreyend for measuring the EPR spectra, Dr. Saeed Raoufmoghaddam for measuring DLS, and Prof. Dr. Joost N. H. Reek for his constant encouragement and support.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
acacacetylacetonato
DLSdynamic light scattering
EPRelectron paramagnetic resonance
GCgas chromatography
IRinfrared
MSmass spectrometry
THFTetrahydrofuran
TONturnover number

References

  1. Bothe, H.; Schmitz, O.; Yates, M.G.; Newton, W.E. Nitrogen Fixation and Hydrogen Metabolism in Cyanobacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2010, 74, 529–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Burgess, B.K.; Lowe, D.J. Mechanism of Molybdenum Nitrogenase. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 2983–3012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Eady, R.R. Structure-Function Relationships of Alternative Nitrogenases. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 3013–3030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hoffman, B.M.; Lukoyanov, D.; Yang, Z.-Y.; Dean, D.R.; Seefeldt, L.C. Mechanism of Nitrogen Fixation by Nitrogenase: The Next Stage. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 4041–4062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hidai, M.; Mizobe, Y. Recent Advances in the Chemistry of Dinitrogen Complexes. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 1115–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bazhenova, T.A.; Shilov, A.E. Nitrogen fixation in solution. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1995, 144, 69–145. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fryzuk, M.D.; Johnson, S.A. The continuing story of dinitrogen activation. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 200–202, 379–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. MacKay, B.A.; Fryzuk, M.D. Dinitrogen coordination chemistry: On the biomimetic borderlands. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 385–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hidai, M.; Mizobe, Y. Research inspired by the chemistry of nitrogenase. Novel metal complexes and their reactivity toward dinitrogen, nitriles, and alkynes. Can. J. Chem. 2005, 83, 358–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hinrichsen, S.; Broda, H.; Gradert, C.; Söncksen, L.; Tuczek, F. Recent developments in synthetic nitrogen fixation. Ann. Rep. Prog. Chem. Sect. A Inorg. Chem. 2012, 108, 17–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Van der Ham, C.J.M.; Koper, M.T.M.; Hetterscheid, D.G.H. Challenges in reduction of dinitrogen by proton and electron transfer. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5183–5191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Khoenkhoen, N.; de Bruin, B.; Reek, J.N.H.; Dzik, W.I. Reactivity of Dinitrogen Bound to Mid- and Late-Transition-Metal Centers. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 567–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bezdek, M.J.; Chirik, P.J. Expanding Boundaries: N2 Cleavage and Functionalization beyond Early Transition Metals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hazari, N. Homogeneous iron complexes for the conversion of dinitrogen into ammonia and hydrazine. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 4044–4056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Crossland, J.L.; Tyler, D.R. Iron-dinitrogen coordination chemistry: Dinitrogen activation and reactivity. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2010, 254, 1883–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. MacLeod, K.C.; Holland, P.L. Recent developments in the homogeneous reduction of dinitrogen by molybdenum and iron. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 559–565. [Google Scholar]
  17. Tanabe, Y.; Nishibayashi, Y. Developing more sustainable processes for ammonia synthesis. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2013, 257, 2551–2564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jia, H.-P.; Quadrelli, E.A. Mechanistic aspects of dinitrogen cleavage and hydrogenation to produce ammonia in catalysis and organometallic chemistry: Relevance of metal hydride bonds and dihydrogen. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 547–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Yandulov, D.V.; Schrock, R.R. Catalytic reduction of dinitrogen to ammonia at a single molybdenum center. Science 2003, 301, 76–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Arashiba, K.; Miyake, Y.; Nishibayashi, Y. A molybdenum complex bearing PNP-type pincer ligands leads to the catalytic reduction of dinitrogen into ammonia. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Arashiba, K.; Kinoshita, E.; Kuriyama, S.; Eizawa, A.; Nakajima, K.; Tanaka, H.; Yoshizawa, K.; Nishibayashi, Y. Catalytic Reduction of Dinitrogen to Ammonia by Use of Molybdenum–Nitride Complexes Bearing a Tridentate Triphosphine as Catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 5666–5669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Anderson, J.S.; Rittle, J.; Peters, J.C. Catalytic conversion of nitrogen to ammonia by an iron model complex. Nature 2013, 501, 84–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Del Castillo, T.J.; Thompson, N.B.; Peters, J.C. A Synthetic Single-Site Fe Nitrogenase: High Turnover, Freeze-Quench 57Fe Mössbauer Data, and a Hydride Resting State. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 5341–5350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shiina, K. Reductive silylation of molecular nitrogen via fixation to tris(trialkylsilyl)amine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 9266–9267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Komori, K.; Oshita, H.; Mizobe, Y.; Hidai, M. Catalytic conversion of molecular nitrogen into silylamines using molybdenum and tungsten dinitrogen complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 1939–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tanaka, H.; Sasada, A.; Kouno, T.; Yuki, M.; Miyake, Y.; Nakanishi, H.; Nishibayashi, Y.; Yoshizawa, K. Molybdenum-Catalyzed Transformation of Molecular Dinitrogen into Silylamine: Experimental and DFT Study on the Remarkable Role of Ferrocenyldiphosphine Ligands. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 3498–3506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Liao, Q.; Saffon-Merceron, N.; Mézailles, N. Catalytic Dinitrogen Reduction at the Molybdenum Center Promoted by a Bulky Tetradentate Phosphine Ligand. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 14206–14210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yuki, M.; Tanaka, H.; Sasaki, K.; Miyake, Y.; Yoshizawa, K.; Nishibayashi, Y. Iron-catalysed transformation of molecular dinitrogen into silylamine under ambient conditions. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ung, G.; Peters, J.C. Low Temperature N2 Binding to 2-coordinate L2Fe0 Enables Reductive Trapping of L2FeN2− and NH3 Generation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 532–535. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lloyd, L. Handbook of Industrial Catalysts; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yamamoto, A.; Miura, Y.; Ito, T.; Chen, H.; Iri, K.; Ozawa, F. Preparation, X-ray molecular structure determination, and chemical properties of dinitrogen-coordinated cobalt complexes containing triphenylphosphine ligands and alkali metal or magnesium. Protonation of the coordinated dinitrogen to ammonia and hydrazine. Organometallics 1983, 2, 1429–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Betley, T.A.; Peters, J.C. Dinitrogen Chemistry from Trigonally Coordinated Iron and Cobalt Platforms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10782–10783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Siedschlag, R.B.; Bernales, V.; Vogiatzis, K.D.; Planas, N.; Clouston, L.J.; Bill, E.; Gagliardi, L.; Lu, C.C. Catalytic Silylation of Dinitrogen with a Dicobalt Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4638–4641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Imayoshi, R.; Tanaka, H.; Matsuo, Y.; Yuki, M.; Nakajima, K.; Yoshizawa, K.; Nishibayashi, Y. Cobalt-Catalyzed Transformation of Molecular Dinitrogen into Silylamine under Ambient Reaction Conditions. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 8905–8909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Del Castillo, T.J.; Thompson, N.B.; Suess, D.L.M.; Ung, G.; Peters, J. Evaluating Molecular Cobalt Complexes for the Conversion of N2 to NH3. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 9256–9262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Evans, W.J.; Workman, P.S. Accessing Lanthanide Diiodide Reactivity for Coupling Alkyl Chlorides to Carbonyl Compounds via the NdI3/Alkali Metal Reduction System. Organometallics 2005, 24, 1989–1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jenkins, D.M.; Di Bilio, A.J.; Allen, M.J.; Betley, T.A.; Peters, J.C. Elucidation of a Low Spin Cobalt(II) System in a Distorted Tetrahedral Geometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 15336–15350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Korstanje, T.J.; van der Vlugt, J.I.; Elsevier, C.J.; de Bruin, B. Hydrogenation of carboxylic acids with a homogeneous cobalt catalyst. Science 2015, 360, 298–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Hojilla Atienza, C.C.; Milsmann, C.; Semproni, S.P.; Turner, Z.R.; Chirik, P.J. Reversible Carbon–Carbon Bond Formation Induced by Oxidation and Reduction at a Redox-Active Cobalt Complex. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 5403–5417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Yamamoto, A.; Kitazume, S.; Pu, L.S.; Ikeda, S. Synthesis and properties of hydridodinitrogentris(triphenylphosphine)cobalt(I) and the related phosphine-cobalt complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Aresta, M.; Rossi, M.; Sacco, A. Tetrahedral complexes of cobalt(I). Inorg. Chim. Acta 1969, 3, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Grutters, M.M.P.; Müller, C.; Vogt, D. Highly Selective Cobalt-Catalyzed Hydrovinylation of Styrene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7414–7415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Inorganics 04 00021 g001 1024
Figure 1. Strategies for catalytic reduction of N2 at ambient conditions.
Figure 1. Strategies for catalytic reduction of N2 at ambient conditions.
Inorganics 04 00021 g001
Inorganics 04 00021 g002 1024
Figure 2. Selected (pre)catalysts for reductive trimethylsilylation of dinitrogen.
Figure 2. Selected (pre)catalysts for reductive trimethylsilylation of dinitrogen.
Inorganics 04 00021 g002
Inorganics 04 00021 g003 1024
Figure 3. Cobalt dinitrogen complexes that allow reactivity of coordinated N2 [31,32,35].
Figure 3. Cobalt dinitrogen complexes that allow reactivity of coordinated N2 [31,32,35].
Inorganics 04 00021 g003
Inorganics 04 00021 g004 1024
Figure 4. Formation of (Me3Si)3N during N2 reduction catalyzed by CoH(PPh3)3N2.
Figure 4. Formation of (Me3Si)3N during N2 reduction catalyzed by CoH(PPh3)3N2.
Inorganics 04 00021 g004
Inorganics 04 00021 g005 1024
Figure 5. (a) X-band EPR spectra of the catalytic reaction mixture recorded at 20 K before the onset (red) and after reaching plateau (blue) of the formation of N(SiMe3)3. Frequency = 9.366 GHz, modulation amplitude: 4 Gauss, attenuation: 20 dB; (b) Selected part of the spectrum showing the hyperfine couplings of the cobalt(II) species.
Figure 5. (a) X-band EPR spectra of the catalytic reaction mixture recorded at 20 K before the onset (red) and after reaching plateau (blue) of the formation of N(SiMe3)3. Frequency = 9.366 GHz, modulation amplitude: 4 Gauss, attenuation: 20 dB; (b) Selected part of the spectrum showing the hyperfine couplings of the cobalt(II) species.
Inorganics 04 00021 g005
Table
Table 1. Screening of catalytic conditions of reductive silylation of N2 a.
Table 1. Screening of catalytic conditions of reductive silylation of N2 a.
#CatalystSolventVol./mLReduct.Yield/% bTON c
1 dCoH(PPh3)3N2THF10Na11.7 ± 1.66.7 ± 1.0
2 eCo(acac)3THF10Na0.9 ± 0.60.5 ± 0.4
3 eCoBr2THF10Na00
4CoTHF10Na00
5 fCo(Cp)2THF10Na15.9 ± 3.48.3 ± 2.3
6 e-THF10Na00
7 eCoCl2(PPh3)2THF10Na1.2 ± 0.60.7 ± 0.3
8 eCoCl(PPh3)3THF10Na6.1 ± 1.23.7 ± 0.7
9CoH(PPh3)3N2Et2O10Na9.15.8
10CoH(PPh3)3N2C6H610Na00
11CoH(PPh3)3N2THF5Na10.86.8
12CoH(PPh3)3N2THF20Na11.67.3
13CoH(PPh3)3N2THF10Li8.75.5
14CoH(PPh3)3N2THF10K00
15CoH(PPh3)3N2THF10KC85.83.5
a Conditions: 0.025 mmol catalyst, 4.5 mmol reductant; 4.72 mmol Me3SiCl, time = 48 h. Me3Si–SiMe3, (Me3Si)2NH and Me3Si–C4H8O–SiMe3 were observed as the main side products; b Yield was determined with GC, using decane (10 μL) as an internal standard, and is based on the maximum theoretical yield of (Me3Si)3N (1.5 mmol); c TON is the amount of (Me3Si)3N formed per cobalt atom; d average of four runs; e average of two runs; f average of three runs.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dzik, W.I. Silylation of Dinitrogen Catalyzed by Hydridodinitrogentris(Triphenylphosphine)Cobalt(I). Inorganics 2016, 4, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics4030021

AMA Style

Dzik WI. Silylation of Dinitrogen Catalyzed by Hydridodinitrogentris(Triphenylphosphine)Cobalt(I). Inorganics. 2016; 4(3):21. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics4030021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dzik, Wojciech I. 2016. "Silylation of Dinitrogen Catalyzed by Hydridodinitrogentris(Triphenylphosphine)Cobalt(I)" Inorganics 4, no. 3: 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics4030021

APA Style

Dzik, W. I. (2016). Silylation of Dinitrogen Catalyzed by Hydridodinitrogentris(Triphenylphosphine)Cobalt(I). Inorganics, 4(3), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics4030021

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop