Next Article in Journal
Complex Structure, Chemical Bonding, and Electrical Transport Properties of a La-Doped Zintl Phase
Next Article in Special Issue
A Novel Fluorescent Chemosensor Based on Rhodamine Schiff Base: Synthesis, Photophysical, Computational and Bioimaging Application in Live Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Platinum–Iron Nanoparticles for Oxygen-Enhanced Sonodynamic Tumor Cell Suppression
Previous Article in Special Issue
Large-Scale Synthesis of Carbon Dots Driven by Schiff Base Reaction at Room Temperature
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Photoluminescence Properties of X-Ray Generated Divalent Sm in Mechanochemically Prepared Nanocrystalline CaF₂:Sm3+

by
Z. Siti Rozaila
1,
Nicolas Riesen
2 and
Hans Riesen
1,*
1
School of Science, The University of New South Wales, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
2
ARC Research Hub for Integrated Devices for End-User Analysis at Low-Levels (IDEAL), Future Industries Institute, STEM, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inorganics 2024, 12(12), 332; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics12120332
Submission received: 27 November 2024 / Revised: 16 December 2024 / Accepted: 17 December 2024 / Published: 20 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synthesis and Application of Luminescent Materials, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
In this study, the mechanochemical preparation of nanocrystalline CaF2:Sm3+ by ball milling calcium acetate hydrate, samarium (III) acetate hydrate, and ammonium fluoride is reported. The photoluminescence of the as-prepared CaF2:Sm3+ shows predominantly Sm3+ 4G5/26HJ(J = 5/2, 7/2, 9/2, and 11/2) f-f luminescence, but intense electric dipole allowed 4f55d (T1u) → 4f6 7F1 (T1g) luminescence by Sm2+ was generated upon X-irradiation. In comparison with the co-precipitated CaF2:Sm3+, the conversion of Sm3+ Sm2+ in the ball-milled sample upon X-irradiation is significantly lower. Importantly, the present results indicate that the crystallite size and X-ray storage phosphor properties of the lanthanide-doped nanocrystalline CaF2 can be modified by adjusting the ball milling time, dopant concentration and post-annealing treatment, yielding crystallite sizes as low as 6 nm under specific experimental conditions.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

CaF2 belongs to the alkaline earth metal fluoride (MF2) compounds which crystallize in the cubic structure with the Fm 3 ¯ m space group [1,2]. The Ca2+ ions lie at the nodes in the face-centred lattice, while F- lies at the centre of the octants [3,4]. There has been growing interest in studying the optical properties of lanthanide (Ln)-doped CaF2 due to its high transmittance properties from the far-UV to the mid-IR range, and the high chemical resistance and low refractive index of this host [5].
Nanocrystalline CaF2:Ln has been prepared by a wide variety of methods, such as co-precipitation [6,7,8], the sol–gel process [9], hydrothermal synthesis [10,11], and thermal decomposition of precursors [12]. In recent years, high-energy ball milling has increasingly been applied to synthesize stoichiometric and non-stoichiometric solid solutions with minimal or solvent free routes [13,14,15,16]. In this process, the mechanical energy caused by the high speed collision of balls in the ball milling jar forces the reagents to react and turn into fine powders that can be on the nanoscale [17]. This method has advantages of increasing the material reactivity, and uniformity of the spatial distribution of elements, and in reducing the possibility of multi-phase formation [18,19]. Heise et al. successfully synthesized Eu3+-doped MF2 (M = Ca, Sr, and Ba) powders by ball milling M(OAc)2, Eu(OAc)3 and NH4F, and crystallite sizes in the range of 12 to 18 nm were obtained [20]. Molaiyan and Witter also reported the preparation of the CaF2:Sm3+ electrolyte by ball milling anhydrous CaF2 and SmF3 in stoichiometric compositions of Sm1−yCayF3−y (0  y  0.15), using a Tanchen planetary ball mill [15]. Although ball milling is a facile method for preparing nanocrystalline powders, this method has still not been widely applied for the preparation of MF2:Ln materials for optical applications.
We have previously reported that nanocrystalline CaF2:Sm3+ prepared by a co-precipitation method can serve as a relatively efficient photoluminescent X-ray storage phosphor, with the storage mechanism based on the reduction of Sm3+ to Sm2+ upon exposure to X-irradiation [21]. It is worth noting that in this case about 65% of trivalent Sm was successfully converted to divalent Sm upon 850 Gy X-irradiation. Samarium-doped systems can be highly sensitive to X-rays, and there is continued interest in identifying potential candidates that display the fast X-ray conversion of Sm3+ to Sm2+ for applications in dosimetry and computed radiography. In the present study, we report the mechanochemical synthesis of nanocrystalline CaF2:Sm3+ by ball milling Ca(OAc)2, Sm(OAc)3, and NH4F at room temperature. The synthesized powders were characterized by XRD, electron microscopy, and luminescence spectroscopy. The effects of the ball milling time, Sm concentration, and post-annealing on the generation of Sm2+ by X-ray were investigated in detail using photoluminescence measurements.

2. Results and Discussion

The XRD patterns of nanocrystalline CaF2:0.1%Sm3+, which were prepared by ball milling for periods of 1, 3, 5 and 8 h, are shown in Figure 1a. In Figure 1b, the XRD patterns of CaF2:ySm3+ ball milled for 8 h with different concentrations of Sm3+ (0 ≤ y ≤ 5%) are illustrated. Finally, in Figure 1c, the XRD patterns of CaF2:0.1%Sm3+ (8 h ball milling period) annealed at temperatures of 200, 300, and 400 °C are shown. The patterns were compared with the standard CaF2 data (PDF-1000043) taken from the Crystallography Open Database [22]. Results from Rietveld refinements obtained by the MAUD 2.93 [23] software package are summarized in Table 1. The goodness of fit G = Rwp/Rexp is <1.5 for all refinements, i.e., implying good fits [24]. As follows from the figures, all the prominent peaks could be indexed to the cubic CaF2 structure with the Fm 3 ¯ m space group [1,2].
As observed in Figure 1a, impurity peaks are still visible after 1 h of milling. A more complete phase formation of nanocrystalline CaF2 can be observed after 3 h. Importantly, prolonged ball milling broadened the diffractions peaks, and this was caused by the decrease of the average crystallite size of CaF2:0.1%Sm3+ from 12 ± 1 to 8 ± 1 nm for ball milling times of 1 to 8 h (Table 1a). A 0.14% expansion of the lattice parameter was also observed with this decrease in the crystallite size. It is noted here that the use of hydrated salts in ball milling may accelerate the formation of CaF2:ySm3+ due to the higher mobility of ions and this was also previously observed in the preparation of nanocrystalline BaFCl [25].
Interestingly, a reduction of the average crystallite size of CaF2:ySm3+ from 12 ± 1 to 6 ± 1 nm (Table 1b) was observed when the Sm3+ concentration was increased from 0 to 5%. The lattice parameter also increased by 0.17% in this case. The latter is most likely caused by the mechanism of charge compensation as Sm3+ substitutes Ca2+. The excess positive charge must be compensated by defects such as O2− impurity ions, substituting F- in the lattice, and/or interstitial F. Also, the electronic repulsion of the ions may increase the lattice parameter [26,27]. Importantly, Sm3+ can easily substitute Ca2+ in the Oh symmetry with eightfold (bcc) coordination, due to their similar ionic radii (Sm3+ = 1.08 Å, compared to Ca2+ = 1.12 Å) [28] and, importantly, phase purity is retained for Sm3+ concentrations up to 5%.
As follows from Figure 1c, the annealing of CaF2:0.1% Sm3+ at 200, 300, and 400 °C significantly narrowed the diffraction peaks. From the Rietveld refinements, average crystallite sizes of 12, 22, and 46 ± 1 nm were obtained, respectively, for these annealing temperatures (Table 1c). The crystallite size appeared to grow by ~T3.4 upon annealing up to 400 °C. Notably, at the higher annealing temperature of 1100 °C, the crystallographic phase purity of CaF2:0.1% Sm3+ is lost, and multiple additional phases are observed in the XRD pattern.
Typical TEM micrographs of CaF2:0.1%Sm3+ prepared by ball milling are displayed in Figure 2. The observed particle size distribution was in qualitative agreement with the average crystallite sizes obtained from the Rietveld refinements. In particular, annealing the sample to 400 °C significantly increased the particle size. A micrograph of CaF2:0.5%Sm3+ prepared by co-precipitation [21] with an average crystallite size of 46 ± 1 nm is shown in Figure 2e for comparison.
Photoluminescence spectra of nanocrystalline CaF2:0.1%Sm3+ prepared by ball milling for 8 h before and after 360 Gy X-irradiation (Cu-Kα) are shown in Figure 3. Sm3+ emission lines centred at 566, 604, 645 and 704 nm (Figure 3a) correspond to 4G5/26HJ (J = 5/2, 7/2, 9/2, and 11/2) f-f transitions, respectively [29,30,31]. Sm3+ 4G5/26H5/2 and 6H7/2 transitions contain magnetic and electric dipole contributions that obey the selection rules J = 0, ±1, while the other two transitions 4G5/26H9/2 and 6H11/2 are purely electric dipole transitions ( J ≤ 6) [32]. The symmetry of the local environment of the trivalent 4f ions can be identified by the relative intensity ratio of electric dipole to magnetic dipole transitions (IR = 4G5/26H9/2/4G5/26H5/2) [33]. The present work indicates that most of the Sm3+ ions occupied the inversion symmetry sites of the CaF2 host lattice, since the IR is <1 [33,34,35]. Note however that charge compensation will in principle lower the site symmetry.
Upon 360 Gy X-irradiation, the luminescence of Sm3+ decreased, as is seen in Figure 3a, accompanied by the rise in the electric dipole allowed Sm2+ 4f55d (T1u) → 4f6 7F1 (T1g) transition at 708.2 nm with vibronic side bands (transverse optical phonon mode of CaF2 due to the Oh5 group symmetry) (Figure 3b) [36,37,38]. Note that the Sm2+ emission is temperature-dependent and very broad at room temperature [39,40,41]. We stress here that no Sm2+ luminescence was observed before X-irradiation, indicating that the Sm ions entered the CaF2 host lattice in their +3 oxidation state. In contrast, Liu et al. reported the presence of Sm2+ emission lines in the absence of X-irradiation in nanocrystalline BaFCl:Sm3+ prepared by ball milling [25].
In Figure 4, the photoluminescence spectra of nanocrystalline CaF2:0.1%Sm3+ are depicted as a function of ball milling time. As follows from Figure 4a, the luminescence of Sm3+ increased with a longer milling time. In contrast, the generation of Sm2+ upon X-irradiation gradually decreased with increasing ball milling time (Figure 4b). This may be due to better embedding and charge compensation for longer ball milling times, e.g., the closer proximity of the charge compensators to the Sm3+ ions. It is also possible that with longer ball milling times, more defects are generated, facilitating efficient non-radiative deactivation paths for the Sm2+.
Photoluminescence spectra of nanocrystalline CaF2:ySm3+ doped with different concentrations of Sm3+ (0.05% ≤ y ≤ 5%), and ball milled for 8 h are shown in Figure 5. As is seen in Figure 5a, the intensity of the Sm3+ luminescence lines of the as-prepared sample increased with the Sm3+ concentration for up to 1%, and then decreased with higher concentrations. Interestingly, the same trend was observed for the Sm2+ luminescence (upon 135 Gy X-irradiation) (Figure 5b). This concentration dependence is most likely due to quenching for concentrations higher than 1%, induced by rapid excitation energy transfer between the Sm ions that leads to non-radiative deactivation at trap sites [42].
In Figure 6, the effect of post-annealing for 1 h at 200, 300, and 400 °C on the luminescence of nanocrystalline CaF2:0.1%Sm3+ (ball milled for 8 h) is summarized. The figure shows that both the Sm3+ luminescence of the as-prepared sample (Figure 6a) and the Sm2+ luminescence of the X-irradiated samples (Figure 6b) became significantly stronger with increasing annealing temperature. The normalized photoluminescence intensity of the Sm3+ and Sm2+ emissions followed a T2.4 and T2.6 power law, respectively. An increase in the photoluminescence intensity of the Sm3+/2+ with increased temperature was previously observed by Liu et al. for BaFCl:Sm3+ [43].
In Figure 7 a comparison is shown between the Sm2+ luminescence of X-irradiated (100 Gy) nanocrystalline CaF2:0.5%Sm3+ prepared by co-precipitation (CPT), and as-prepared (as well as annealed at 400 °C) CaF2:0.5%Sm3+ prepared by 8 h of ball milling (BM). As seen from the inset of this figure, the Sm2+ generation of BM CaF2:0.5%Sm3+ significantly increased by a factor of 23 after annealing at 400 °C, with crystallite size increasing from 8 nm to 44 nm. In addition, both CPT CaF2:0.5%Sm3+ and annealed BM CaF2:0.5%Sm3+ had similar average crystallite sizes of 46 nm and 44 nm, respectively. However, in comparison with the CPT sample, the Sm2+ luminescence intensity of the annealed BM sample was lowered by a factor of 3 after 100 Gy X-irradiation. This indicated a faster Sm3+ → Sm2+ conversion upon X-irradiation in the CPT sample when compared to the BM samples. In the BM sample the trivalent Sm3+ may be more stabilized by a charge compensator due to the prolonged milling and annealing time, enabling ionic rearrangements of the lattice [44]. However, multiple extra peaks in the Sm3+ luminescence were noted in BM CaF2: 0.5% Sm3+ upon annealing at the higher temperature of 1100 °C. This may be related to the extra phases observed in the XRD pattern, which are possibly due to the generation of some oxyfluoride phases.

3. Experimental Methods

Nanocrystalline CaF2:ySm3+ (y = mol%) was prepared by ball milling Ca(OAc)2·H2O (May & Baker Ltd., Essex, England), Sm(OAc)3.xH2O (Sigma Aldrich, Australia), and NH4F (Sigma Aldrich) according to the following solid-state reaction:
1 y Ca OAc 2 · H 2 O + y Sm OAc 3 · x H 2 O + 2 + y NH 4 F Ca 1 y Sm y F 2 + y + 2 + y NH 3 + ( 2 + y ) HOAc +   ( 1 y + xy ) H 2 O
Reagents (with y = 0.1%) were premixed and ground using a mortar and pestle before being transferred into a 12 mL zirconia ball mill jar with six 5 mm diameter zirconia balls. The mixtures were then ball milled for 1, 3, 5 or 8 h to investigate the dependence of physical properties on ball milling time. The ball milling was performed using a Planetary Mill (Pulverisette 7 from Fritsch, Germany) at 10 Hz. The mixture obtained was dried overnight in an oven (Labec, Model H323, Marrickville, Australia) at 60 °C. The final product was then ground using a mortar and pestle to yield a homogenous nanocrystalline powder. Nanocrystalline CaF2:ySm3+ powders with different Sm concentrations (y = 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1, 3, and 5%) were also prepared with a ball milling time of 8 h. Post-annealing by using a muffle furnace (Labec, CEMLS-SD) was undertaken at temperatures of 200, 300, and 400 °C in air.
The phase purity of samples was characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) on a Rigaku MiniFlex-600 benchtop diffractometer with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 0.154 nm, 40 kV and 15 mA) with a scanning step and speed of 0.01° and 0.5°/min, respectively. Data was collected in the 2θ range of 10° to 100°. TEM imaging was undertaken by a Tecnai G2 Spirit transmission electron microscope (FEI, Oregon, USA).
Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of Sm3+ were measured by using a Horiba Jobin-Yvon Spex FluoroMax-3 fluorometer (controlled by the FluorEssence software) at room temperature with 405 nm excitation. Sm2+ luminescence spectra were recorded on a Spex 500 M monochromator (150 grooves/mm grating), equipped with an Andor iDus camera (DV401A-BV Si CCD). A closed-cycle cryostat (CTI-Cryogenics Cryodyne model 22) was used to cool the sample to 27 K. In this case, the samples were excited by a focused 635 nm laser diode. The powders were manually pressed into a counterbore of 5 mm diameter and 0.5 mm depth on an aluminium holder.
The X-ray based reduction of Sm3+ to Sm2+ was undertaken on the Rigaku Miniflex-600 benchtop powder XRD diffractometer at a 2θ angle of 30° (dose rate ~15 mGy s−1). The X-ray dose was cross-calibrated against a Sirona (Erlangen, Germany) HELIODENT Plus dental X-ray source.

4. Conclusions

We have reported a direct and facile mechanochemical preparation route for nanocrystalline CaF2:Sm3+ by ball milling Ca(OAc), Sm(OAc)2, and NH4F at room temperature. The photoluminescence spectra of the as-prepared samples display the Sm3+ 4GJ6HJ luminescence lines, whereas X-irradiation generates Sm2+ with its characteristic luminescence around 708 nm at low temperatures. A ball milling period of 3 to 4 h was found to result in the best single phase, whereas shorter or longer ball milling times resulted in some impurity phases. A longer ball milling period such as 8 h reduced the efficacy of Sm2+ generation by X-irradiation. This is likely due to the stabilization of the trivalent state by embedding the charge compensator in the vicinity of the Sm ion, as well as more effective non-radiative deactivation by the introduction of more defects. Maximum luminescence was observed for the sample with a 1 mol% Sm3+ concentration, and at a higher concentration quenching was observed. Interestingly, post-annealing substantially increases the X-ray induced Sm3+ to Sm2+ conversion. It is noted here that attempts to anneal at higher temperatures such as 1100 °C (in air) generated extra phases in the XRD pattern with an associated change in the Sm3+ luminescence spectrum. In comparison with the co-precipitation (CPT)-sample, the Sm3+ ion in the ball milling sample (BM) is much more stable. The present results demonstrated that the X-ray storage efficiency of nanocrystalline CaF2 can be controlled in the preparation process by varying parameters such as ball milling time, annealing temperature and rare earth ion concentration. This study offers valuable insights into the X-ray storage properties of ball-milled CaF2:Sm3+, particularly the accelerated reduction of Sm ions, with potential applications in areas such as dosimetry and computed radiography.

Author Contributions

Z.S.R.: Sample preparation, investigation, data curation, formal analysis, writing—original draft. N.R.: TEM analysis, writing—review and editing. H.R.: supervision, conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

UNSW International Postgraduate Award.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author(s).

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support of The University of New South Wales (UNSW) at the Australian Defence Force Academy for a University International Postgraduate Award. The authors thank Adelaide Microscopy as well as Nobuyuki Kawashima of the Future Industries Institute at the University of South Australia for assistance with TEM imaging.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have been appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Gerward, L.; Olsen, J.S.; Steenstrup, S.; Malinowski, M.; Åsbrink, S.; Waskowska, A. X-ray Diffraction Investigations of CaF2 at High Pressure. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1992, 25, 578–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hazen, R.M.; Finger, L.W. Calcium fluoride as an internal pressure standard in high-pressure cyrstallography. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1981, 14, 234–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Song, K.S.; Williams, R.T. Alkaline Earth Fluorides. In Self-Trapped Excitons; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1993; pp. 96–122. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cheetham, A.; Fender, B.; Cooper, M. Defect structure of calcium fluoride containing excess anions I. Bragg scattering. J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 2001, 4, 3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ye, W.; Liu, X.; Qiying, H.; Zhou, Z.; Hu, G. Co-precipitation synthesis and self-reduction of CaF2:Eu2+ nanoparticles using different surfactants. Mater. Res. Bull. 2016, 83, 428–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cantelar, E.; Sanz-García, J.A.; Sanz-Martín, A.; Muñoz Santiuste, J.E.; Cussó, F. Structural, photoluminescent properties and Judd-Ofelt analysis of Eu3+-activated CaF2 nanocubes. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 813, 152194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pandurangappa, C.; Lakshminarasappa, B.N. Optical studies of samarium-doped fluoride nanoparticles. Philos. Mag. 2011, 91, 4486–4494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rozaila, Z.S.; Riesen, H. Photoinduced electron transfer in Eu2+ and Sm3+ co-doped CaF2 nanocrystals prepared by co-precipitation. Opt. Mater. 2024, 150, 115225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ritter, B.; Krahl, T.; Rurack, K.; Kemnitz, E. Nanoscale CaF2 doped with Eu3+ and Tb3+ through fluorolytic sol–gel synthesis. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 8607–8613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yuan, G.; Murai, S.; Tamura, S.; Tomita, K.; Tanaka, K. Enhancement of up- and downconversion photoluminescence from Yb3+, Er3+ co-doped CaF2 nanoparticles deposited on two-dimensional plasmonic arrays. In Proceedings of the Proceedings Volume 11194, Plasmonics IV, Hangzhou, China, 20–23 October 2019. [Google Scholar]
  11. Nakhaei, O.; Shahtahmassebi, N.; Mahmood, R. Synthesis and Characterization of CaF2 NPs with Co-precipitation and Hydrothermal Method. J. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 116. [Google Scholar]
  12. Quan, Z.; Yang, D.; Yang, P.; Zhang, X.; Lian, H.; Liu, X.; Lin, J. Uniform Colloidal Alkaline Earth Metal Fluoride Nanocrystals: Nonhydrolytic Synthesis and Luminescence Properties. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 9509–9517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. James, S.; Adams, C.; Bolm, C.; Braga, D.; Collier, P.; Friscic, T.; Grepioni, F.; Harris, K.; Hyett, G.; Jones, W.; et al. Mechanochemistry: Opportunities for new and cleaner synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 41, 413–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Heise, M.; Scholz, G.; Düvel, A.; Heitjans, P.; Kemnitz, E. Mechanochemical synthesis, structure, and properties of solid solutions of alkaline earth metal fluorides: Ma1−xMbxF2 (M: Ca, Sr, Ba). Solid State Sci. 2016, 60, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Molaiyan, P.; Witter, R. Mechanochemical synthesis of solid-state electrolyte Sm1−xCaxF3−x for batteries and other electrochemical devices. Mater. Lett. 2019, 244, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chowdhury, N.; Riesen, N.; Riesen, H. Yb3+ and Er3+ Codoped BaLiF3 Nanocrystals for X-ray Dosimetry and Imaging by Upconversion Luminescence. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 6659–6667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Do, J.-L.; Friščić, T. Mechanochemistry: A Force of Synthesis. ACS Cent. Sci. 2017, 3, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sadykov, V.A.; Mezentseva, N.V.; Bobrova, L.N.; Smorygo, O.L.; Eremeev, N.F.; Fedorova, Y.E.; Bespalko, Y.N.; Skriabin, P.I.; Krasnov, A.V.; Lukashevich, A.I.; et al. Chapter 12—Advanced Materials for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells and Membrane Catalytic Reactors. In Advanced Nanomaterials for Catalysis and Energy; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 435–514. [Google Scholar]
  19. Düvel, A.; Wilkening, M.; Uecker, R.; Wegner, S.; Sepelak, V.; Heitjans, P. Mechanosynthesized nanocrystalline BaLiF3: The impact of grain boundaries and structural disorder on ionic transport. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 11251–11262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Heise, M.; Scholz, G.; Krahl, T.; Kemnitz, E. Luminescent properties of Eu3+ doped CaF2, SrF2, BaF2 and PbF2 powders prepared by high-energy ball milling. Solid State Sci. 2019, 91, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rozaila, Z.S.; Riesen, N.; Riesen, H. Luminescence and photoionization of X-ray generated Sm2+ in coprecipitated CaF2 nanocrystals. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 16205–16213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Crystallography Open Database. Available online: http://www.crystallography.net/cod/index.php (accessed on 1 December 2019).
  23. MAUD. Available online: http://maud.radiographema.eu/ (accessed on 2 December 2019).
  24. Zhang, J.; Riesen, H. Photostimulated and persistent luminescence of samarium ions in BaFCl. J. Lumin. 2019, 207, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, Z.; Stevens-Kalceff, M.A.; Wang, X.; Riesen, H. Mechanochemical synthesis of nanocrystalline BaFCl:Sm3+ storage phosphor by ball milling. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2013, 588, 193–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bensalah, A.; Mortier, M.; Patriarche, G.; Gredin, P.; Vivien, D. Synthesis and optical characterizations of undoped and rare-earth-doped CaF2 nanoparticles. J. Solid State Chem. 2006, 179, 2636–2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhi, G.; Song, J.; Mei, B.; Weibing, Z. Synthesis and Characterization of Er3+ Doped CaF2 Nanoparticles. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 9133–9137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shannon, R.D. Revised Effective Ionic Radii and Systematic Studies of Interatomic Distances in Halides and Chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr. 1976, 32, 751–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wells, J.-P.R. Laser Spectroscopy of Alkaline Earth Fluoride Crystals Doped with Trivalent Samarium and Europium Ions. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zeland, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  30. Mikhail, P.; Ramseyer, K.; Frei, G.; Budde, F.; Hulliger, J. Bleaching of Sm2+ during photoluminescence and cathodoluminescence. Opt. Commun. 2001, 188, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rabbiner, N. Fluorescence of Sm3+ in CaF2. Phys. Rev. 1963, 130, 502–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bungala, C.J.; Kumar, M.; Gopal, K. Fluorescence properties and energy transfer mechanism of Sm3+ ion in lead telluroborate glasses. Opt. Mater. 2011, 33, 1643–1647. [Google Scholar]
  33. Jamalaiah, B.C.; Rasool, S.N. Fluorescence properties of Sm3+ ions in yttrium aluminum borate phosphors for optical applications. J. Mol. Struct. 2015, 1097, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lakshminarayana, G.; Yang, R.; Mao, M.; Qiu, J.; Kityk, I.V. Photoluminescence of Sm3+, Dy3+, and Tm3+-doped transparent glass ceramics containing CaF2 nanocrystals. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2009, 355, 2668–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Qiao, Y.-P.; Chen, P. Luminescence, energy transfer, and color adjustment of CaO-CaF2-Al2O3-B2O3-SiO2 glass co-doped with CeO2 and Sm2O3. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2021, 552, 120461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wood, D.L.; Kaiser, W. Absorption and Fluorescence of Sm2+ in CaF2, SrF2, and BaF2. Phys. Rev. 1962, 126, 2079–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kelly-Gorham, M.R.K.; DeVetter, B.M.; Brauer, C.S.; Cannon, B.D.; Burton, S.D.; Bliss, M.; Johnson, T.J.; Myers, T.L. Complex refractive index measurements for BaF2 and CaF2 via single-angle infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Opt. Mater. 2017, 72, 743–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kaiser, W.; Spitzer, W.G.; Kaiser, R.H.; Howarth, L.E. Infrared properties of CaF2, SrF2, and BaF2. Phys. Rev. 1962, 127, 1950–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rozaila, Z.S.; Hutchison, W.; Riesen, H. Persistent Spectral Hole-Burning and Zeeman Effect of X-ray-Induced Sm2+ in CaF2:Sm3+ Nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. C 2023, 127, 16950–16959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Radzhabov, E.A. Spectroscopy of divalent samarium in alkaline-earth fluorides. Opt. Mater. 2018, 85, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kaiser, W.; Garrett, C.G.B.; Wood, D.L. Fluorescence and Optical Maser Effects in CaF2:Sm++. Phys. Rev. 1961, 123, 766–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Qiao, Y.-P. Influence of Sm2O3 and CaF2 Concentration on the Enhancement of Luminescence and Red Colour in Borosilicate Glass. Trans. Indian Ceram. Soc. 2021, 80, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, Z.Q.; Stevens-Kalceff, M.A.; Riesen, H. Effects of Postannealing on the Photoluminescence Properties of Coprecipitated Nanocrystalline BaFCl:Sm3+. J. Phys. Chem. A 2013, 117, 1930–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Stevens-Kalceff, M.A.; Liu, Z.; Riesen, H. Cathodoluminescence Microanalysis of Irradiated Microcrystalline and Nanocrystalline Samarium Doped BaFCl. Microsc. Microanal. 2012, 18, 1229–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD patterns (semi-logarithmic plot) of (a) nanocrystalline CaF2:0.1% Sm3+ prepared by ball milling for 1, 3, 5 and 8 h, (b) nanocrystalline CaF2:ySm3+ with different concentrations of Sm3+ (0 ≤ y ≤ 5%) ball milled for 8 h, and (c) nanocrystalline CaF2:0.1%Sm3+ as prepared by ball milling for 8 h and subsequently annealed at 200, 300, and 400 °C. Experimental data and Rietveld refinements are shown as black and red lines, respectively. The standard data of cubic CaF2 (PDF-1000043) is shown in blue. The green asterisks indicate impurity phases.
Figure 1. XRD patterns (semi-logarithmic plot) of (a) nanocrystalline CaF2:0.1% Sm3+ prepared by ball milling for 1, 3, 5 and 8 h, (b) nanocrystalline CaF2:ySm3+ with different concentrations of Sm3+ (0 ≤ y ≤ 5%) ball milled for 8 h, and (c) nanocrystalline CaF2:0.1%Sm3+ as prepared by ball milling for 8 h and subsequently annealed at 200, 300, and 400 °C. Experimental data and Rietveld refinements are shown as black and red lines, respectively. The standard data of cubic CaF2 (PDF-1000043) is shown in blue. The green asterisks indicate impurity phases.
Inorganics 12 00332 g001
Figure 2. TEM micrographs of nanocrystalline CaF2:0.1%Sm3+, ball milled for (a) 3 h and (b) 8 h, annealed at (c) 200 °C, (d) 400 °C, and (e) nanocrystalline CaF2:0.5%Sm3+ prepared by co-precipitation.
Figure 2. TEM micrographs of nanocrystalline CaF2:0.1%Sm3+, ball milled for (a) 3 h and (b) 8 h, annealed at (c) 200 °C, (d) 400 °C, and (e) nanocrystalline CaF2:0.5%Sm3+ prepared by co-precipitation.
Inorganics 12 00332 g002
Figure 3. Photoluminescence spectra of nanocrystalline CaF2:0.1% Sm3+ prepared by ball milling for 8 h, before and after 360 Gy X-irradiation. (a) Region of Sm3+ luminescence at 293 K and (b) region of the Sm2+ 4f55d (T1u) → 4f6 7F1 (T1g) emission at 27 K.
Figure 3. Photoluminescence spectra of nanocrystalline CaF2:0.1% Sm3+ prepared by ball milling for 8 h, before and after 360 Gy X-irradiation. (a) Region of Sm3+ luminescence at 293 K and (b) region of the Sm2+ 4f55d (T1u) → 4f6 7F1 (T1g) emission at 27 K.
Inorganics 12 00332 g003
Figure 4. Photoluminescence spectra of nanocrystalline CaF2:0.1% Sm3+ prepared by ball milling for 1, 3, 5, and 8 h (red, black, green and blue traces, respectively). (a) Sm3+ region at 293 K of the as-prepared sample and (b) Sm2+ 4f55d (T1u) → 4f6 7F1 (T1g) region at 27 K after 135 Gy X-irradiation. The insets show corresponding integrated intensities (red circles are data points; the blue dotted line is a guide to the eye) as a function of ball milling time.
Figure 4. Photoluminescence spectra of nanocrystalline CaF2:0.1% Sm3+ prepared by ball milling for 1, 3, 5, and 8 h (red, black, green and blue traces, respectively). (a) Sm3+ region at 293 K of the as-prepared sample and (b) Sm2+ 4f55d (T1u) → 4f6 7F1 (T1g) region at 27 K after 135 Gy X-irradiation. The insets show corresponding integrated intensities (red circles are data points; the blue dotted line is a guide to the eye) as a function of ball milling time.
Inorganics 12 00332 g004
Figure 5. Photoluminescence spectra of CaF2:ySm3+ with 0.05% ≤ y ≤ 5% in the region of (a) Sm3+ at 293 K of the as-prepared sample and (b) Sm2+ 4f55d (T1u) → 4f6 7F1 (T1g) at 27 K upon 135 Gy X-irradiation. Integrated intensities of (a) Sm3+ 4G5/26H5/2 and (b) the Sm2+ emission band as a function of Sm concentration are shown in the insets.
Figure 5. Photoluminescence spectra of CaF2:ySm3+ with 0.05% ≤ y ≤ 5% in the region of (a) Sm3+ at 293 K of the as-prepared sample and (b) Sm2+ 4f55d (T1u) → 4f6 7F1 (T1g) at 27 K upon 135 Gy X-irradiation. Integrated intensities of (a) Sm3+ 4G5/26H5/2 and (b) the Sm2+ emission band as a function of Sm concentration are shown in the insets.
Inorganics 12 00332 g005
Figure 6. Photoluminescence spectra of CaF2:0.1%Sm3+ annealed at 200, 300, and 400 °C for 1 h in air. (a) Sm3+ region of the as-prepared sample at 293 K, (b) Sm2+ region of the 135 Gy X-irradiated sample at 27 K. The insets of (a,b) show normalized intensities of Sm3+ and Sm2+ luminescence, respectively (red circles are data points; the blue dotted lines are exponential fits).
Figure 6. Photoluminescence spectra of CaF2:0.1%Sm3+ annealed at 200, 300, and 400 °C for 1 h in air. (a) Sm3+ region of the as-prepared sample at 293 K, (b) Sm2+ region of the 135 Gy X-irradiated sample at 27 K. The insets of (a,b) show normalized intensities of Sm3+ and Sm2+ luminescence, respectively (red circles are data points; the blue dotted lines are exponential fits).
Inorganics 12 00332 g006
Figure 7. Comparison of photoluminescence spectra of nanocrystalline CaF2:0.5%Sm3+ prepared by co-precipitation (CPT) and as-prepared (as well as annealed at 400 °C) CaF2:0.5%Sm3+ prepared by 8 h of ball milling (BM). The inset shows a 3x magnification of BM CaF2:0.5%Sm3+.
Figure 7. Comparison of photoluminescence spectra of nanocrystalline CaF2:0.5%Sm3+ prepared by co-precipitation (CPT) and as-prepared (as well as annealed at 400 °C) CaF2:0.5%Sm3+ prepared by 8 h of ball milling (BM). The inset shows a 3x magnification of BM CaF2:0.5%Sm3+.
Inorganics 12 00332 g007
Table 1. Summary of XRD results obtained from Rietveld refinements. Rwp and Rexp are the weighted-profile R-factor and expected R-factor. G is the goodness of fit (Rwp/Rexp).
Table 1. Summary of XRD results obtained from Rietveld refinements. Rwp and Rexp are the weighted-profile R-factor and expected R-factor. G is the goodness of fit (Rwp/Rexp).
(a) Ball milling time
CaF2: 0.1% Sm 3+
Time (h)Average crystallite size
± 1 (nm)
Lattice parameter, a (Å)Rietveld refinement
R w p
%
R e x p
%
G
1125.4754 ± 0.001218.914.51.30
3115.4763 ± 0.001019.015.11.26
595.4823 ± 0.001219.414.91.30
885.4832 ± 0.001318.514.91.24
(b) Concentration of Sm 3+
CaF2: ySm 3+, 8 h ball milling time
y%Average crystallite size
± 1 (nm)
Lattice parameter, a (Å)Rietveld refinement
R w p
%
R e x p
%
G
0125.4824 ± 0.001115.913.91.14
0.05115.4826 ± 0.001216.813.81.22
0.195.4832 ± 0.001318.514.91.24
0.395.4838 ± 0.001217.414.41.21
0.585.4844 ± 0.001117.815.21.17
185.4864 ± 0.001017.314.61.18
375.4880 ± 0.001417.114.51.18
565.4915 ± 0.001717.214.61.18
(c) Annealing temperature
CaF2: 0.1% Sm 3+, 8 h ball milling time
Temp.
(°C)
Average crystallite size
± 1 (nm)
Lattice parameter, a (Å)Rietveld refinement
R w p
%
R e x p
%
G
as-pre95.4774 ± 0.001120.915.01.39
200125.4753 ± 0.000719.315.41.25
300225.4701 ± 0.000418.715.31.22
400455.4687 ± 0.000218.715.21.23
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rozaila, Z.S.; Riesen, N.; Riesen, H. Photoluminescence Properties of X-Ray Generated Divalent Sm in Mechanochemically Prepared Nanocrystalline CaF₂:Sm3+. Inorganics 2024, 12, 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics12120332

AMA Style

Rozaila ZS, Riesen N, Riesen H. Photoluminescence Properties of X-Ray Generated Divalent Sm in Mechanochemically Prepared Nanocrystalline CaF₂:Sm3+. Inorganics. 2024; 12(12):332. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics12120332

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rozaila, Z. Siti, Nicolas Riesen, and Hans Riesen. 2024. "Photoluminescence Properties of X-Ray Generated Divalent Sm in Mechanochemically Prepared Nanocrystalline CaF₂:Sm3+" Inorganics 12, no. 12: 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics12120332

APA Style

Rozaila, Z. S., Riesen, N., & Riesen, H. (2024). Photoluminescence Properties of X-Ray Generated Divalent Sm in Mechanochemically Prepared Nanocrystalline CaF₂:Sm3+. Inorganics, 12(12), 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics12120332

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop