Next Article in Journal
Large-Scale Synthesis of Carbon Dots Driven by Schiff Base Reaction at Room Temperature
Next Article in Special Issue
Tetrazenyl-, Imido-, and Azidoaluminate Derivatives of a Sterically Demanding Bis-Silazide Ligand
Previous Article in Journal
Naturally Occurring Microbiota-Accessible Borates: A Focused Minireview
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Characterization of Extremely Bulky Aminopyridinate Ligands and a Series of Their Groups 1 and 2 Metal Complexes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Oxidative Addition to Group 1 (K, Rb, Cs) Alumanyl Anions as a Route to o-Carboranyl (hydrido)aluminates

Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inorganics 2024, 12(12), 309; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics12120309
Submission received: 25 October 2024 / Revised: 18 November 2024 / Accepted: 22 November 2024 / Published: 27 November 2024

Abstract

The kinetic stability provided by the sterically demanding {SiNDipp}2− dianion (SiNDipp = {CH2SiMe2NDipp}2; Dipp = 2,6-i-Pr2C6H3) is intrinsic to the isolation of not only the group 1 alumanyl reagents ([{SiNDipp}AlM]2; M = K, Rb, Cs) but also facilitates the completely selective oxidative addition of a C-H bond of 1,2-C2B10H12 to the aluminium centre. In each case, the resultant compounds comprise a four-coordinate o-carboranyl (hydrido)aluminate anion, [(SiNDipp)Al(H)(1,2-C2B10H11)], in which the carboranyl cage is bonded to aluminium by an Al-C σ bond. Although the anions further assemble as extended network structures based on Al-H∙∙∙M, B-H∙∙∙M, and C-H∙∙∙M interactions, each structure is unique due to the significant variation in M+ ionic radius as group 1 is descended. The potassium derivative crystallises as a one-dimensional polymer, its rubidium analogue is a dimer due to the polyhapto-sequestration of a molecule of benzene solvent within the alkali metal coordination sphere, and the caesium species is a two-dimensional assembly of hexameric aggregates.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The experimental realisation and structural rationalisation of charge-neutral carborane icosahedra and anionic carboranyl cage structures have proved influential in both the practical and theoretical development of main group element chemistry [1,2,3,4,5]. Initial access to C-bonded organometallic derivatives of carboranes was attempted from the reaction of C-lithiated ortho, meta, or para-carborane with compounds with metal–halogen bonds [6]. Despite long-standing interest, however, structurally characterised species are represented by a surprising paucity of examples, albeit the resultant carboranyl derivatives having been observed to coordinate metals through one [7], two [8], or three [9] B–H agostic interactions, as well as direct C–M [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] and B–M [19] sigma bonding.
With specific reference to the chemistry of aluminium, although several derivatives in which the nido-1,2-B9C2H112− (dicarbollyl) dianion acts as a η5-bonded ligand toward the heavier group, 13 elements have been described [20,21,22,23,24,25], and two derivatives utilising a N,C-chelating 2-dimethylaminomethyl-o-carboranyl, [2-(Me2NCH2)C2B10H10]AlX2 (X = Br, CH3), have been reported [26], C-aluminated examples of the unfunctionalised [closo-1,2-C2B10H11] monoanion appear to have evaded definitive structural characterisation. A likely explanation for this lacuna is provided by Bregadze and co-workers’ report that reactions of aluminium, gallium, indium, and thallium trialkyls or i-Bu2AlH with carboranes in the presence of TMEDA, HMPA, or DME predominantly result in degradation of the carborane cage [27]. These latter issues are reminiscent of various attempts to access well-defined C-bonded carboranyl derivatives of the alkaline earth elements, where crystallographically authenticated examples of carboranyl compounds comprising a group 2 atom were, for over 30 years, restricted to the C-methylated species, [Mg(2-Me-1,2-C2B10H10)2∙2C4H8O2] [28]. In this latter regard, and in common with a multitude of advances in main group element chemistry, we have very recently demonstrated that the kinetic stability imparted by the β-diketiminate (BDI = HC{(Me)CNDipp}2; Dipp = 2,6-i-Pr2C6H3) spectator monoanion to the magnesium and calcium species, I and II, facilitates relatively straightforward access to the C-metallated derivatives of the parent o-carborane, 1,2-C2B10H12 (Figure 1a) [29].
During the last five years, we have reported on the analogous ability of the {SiNDipp}2- dianion (SiNDipp = {CH2SiMe2NDipp}2) to provide the requisite kinetic stability to prevent the disproportionation of the low oxidation state group 2 and group 13 species, III and IVM (Figure 1b/c) [30,31,32,33,34]. The reactivity of III and IVM arises from the reducing potential of the constituent magnesium (I) and aluminium (I) centres [35,36], and we have, for example, very recently observed that the C-H bonds of terminal alkynes are prone to their ready oxidative addition at the low-valence aluminium centres of compounds IVM to yield the corresponding group 1 (M = K, Rb, Cs) alkynyl (hydrido)aluminates (Figure 1c) [37]. The comparable pKa values of the C-H bonds of 1,2-C2B10H12 and terminal acetylenes (~23) [38,39] suggested that an analogous treatment of IVM with ortho-carborane may similarly provide Al(I) oxidative addition and access to the parent o-carboranyl group 13 aluminate complexes. In this contribution, therefore, we demonstrate that the kinetic stability leveraged by the {SiNDipp}2− dianion in conjunction with the highly reducing nature of IVM provide ready access to the C-Al bonded alkali metal o-carboranyl (hydrido)aluminates, [{SiNDipp}Al(H)(1,2-C2B10H11)M] [M = K (1); Rb (2); Cs (3)].

2. Results and Discussion

The addition of two molar equivalents of ortho-carborane to benzene solutions of the dimeric derivatives, IVM (M = K, Rb, Cs), resulted in the decolourisation of the characteristic yellow solutions of the alumanyl anions, either within 10 min (K) or instantaneously (Rb and Cs) at room temperature, to provide compounds 13, respectively (Scheme 1). In all three cases and indicative of the complete consumption of the group 1 alumanyl starting reagents, analysis by 1H NMR spectroscopy revealed the disappearance of the {SiNDipp} iso-propyl methine signals at δ 3.97 (IVK) [31], 4.04 (IVRb), and 4.12 ppm (IVCs). Although these spectra recorded in situ were contaminated by excess ortho-carborane, which was clearly apparent from a residual C-H methine signal at δ 2.07 ppm, the observed data, while not unambiguously diagnostic, were consistent with the formation of three compounds which presented a high degree of commonality in solution. The observation of a single multiplet at ca. δ 4.1 ppm, corresponding to four protons by relative integration in all three solutions, was consistent with the maintenance of the C2-symmetric {SiNDipp} chelate about the aluminium centres. Although no Al-H resonances could be identified due to the quadrupolar nature of the aluminium nucleus (27Al, 100%, I = 5/2), a broadened but diagnostic (1H) singlet could in each case be identified as arising from the remaining C-H methine environment of the o-carboranyl (1,2-C2B10H11) anion. The frequencies of these latter signals evidenced a marginal deshielding with increasing alkali metal atomic weight (1, δH 3.35; 2, 3.33; 3, 3.30 ppm), a trend that was replicated in the 13C NMR chemical shifts in the residual o-carboranyl methine signals (1, δC 63.6; 2, 63.3; 3, 63.0 ppm), which were readily identified in the corresponding HSQC experiments. The unambiguous assignment of 11B chemical shifts in even underivatised 1,2-C2B10H12 can require careful consideration of residual quadrupolar couplings [40]. Although we were unable to obtain 11B NMR spectra that were uncontaminated by 1,2-C2B10H12 for compounds 1 and 2, all three derivatives provided identical 11B{1H} NMR spectra comprising four broad signals between δ11B −0.5 and −11 ppm and consistent with a lowering of the symmetry of the carborane cage. In totality, therefore, these solution-state data infer that the integrity of the carboranyl cage structure in each case has been maintained subsequent to its alumination at a single C-H vertex.
Compounds 13 were isolated in good yields (70–80%) as colourless crystalline solids, suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis, which confirmed the veracity of the solution-based experiments. Although the asymmetric unit of the potassium derivative (1) comprises a single potassium aluminate ion pair and a non-interacting molecule of occluded benzene, the gross structure propagates as one-dimensional polymers parallel to the crystallographic c-axis (Figure 2). The aluminium-bound hydride (H1) was located and refined without restraints and interacts with a potassium cation, which is further encapsulated by close contacts to the B2-H and B3-H units of the aluminated carborane cage and a combination of intra- and intermolecular polyhapto interactions with the Dipp substituents of the chelating {SiNDipp}2- dianions. Although there is no direct precedent for the unsupported Al-C σ bond of 1 [Al1-C31 2.0804(14) Å], this bond length is closely comparable to the dimethylaluminium derivative, [2-(Me2NCH2)C2B10H10]AlMe2 [2.010(6) Å] [26], but is shorter than the range of Al-C interactions [typically ca. 2.25 Å] [20,21,22,23,24,25] reported for several aluminium η5-dicarbollylide derivatives. The Al-C bond of 1 is also only marginally elongated in comparison to the Al-C (sp) bond lengths typically observed in similarly four-coordinate terminal aluminium acetylides [ca. 1.91–1.98 Å] [41,42,43,44,45,46,47].
In contrast to the extended structure of 1, the asymmetric unit of its rubidium analogue (2) comprises half of a dimer, the remainder of which is generated via crystallographic inversion symmetry (Figure 3). The rubidium cations are again enveloped by a combination of Al-H, B-H, and C-H interactions to both the hydridoaluminate and carboranyl units, the latter of which also bridge via B-H∙∙∙Rb close contacts between the two dimer halves. The rubidium coordination environment is completed by its η6 engagement with a single {SiNDipp} N-aryl substituent [range of Rb-C distances: 3.2500(17)–3.5116(16) Å], while polymer propagation analogous to that observed for 1 is prevented by a further polyhapto interaction between both rubidium centres of each dimer and a molecule of benzene solvent [range of Rb-C distances: 3.337(9)–3.563(5) Å]. Although the Al1-C31 bond length in 2 [2.1018(16) Å] is slightly elongated in comparison to that of 1, we suggest that this observation, along with some minor variations across the comparable C-B and B-B bond lengths in the carboranyl cages, are more a reflection of the additional B-H∙∙∙Rb bridging interactions leveraged by the dimeric structure of 2 than any significant perturbation to the electronic structures of the two compounds through the replacement of K+ by Rb+.
A further impact of the increasing radius of the group 1 cation [effective six-coordinate radii: K+ 1.38; Rb+ 1.52; Cs+ 1.67 Å] [48] was made evident from the single crystal X-ray analysis of compound 3. Although complicated by various issues with disorder across both the {SiNDipp} ligands and two molecules of occluded benzene solvent, the structure was identified as a further polymeric array assembled by a complex series of Al-H∙∙∙Cs, B-H∙∙∙Cs, and C-H∙∙∙Cs interactions and η6 engagements between caesium and a Dipp substituent of each {SiNDipp} ligand (Figure 4a). While the asymmetric unit thus comprises three unique caesium o-carboranyl (hydrido)aluminates, the gross structure assembles as a sequence of hexacyclic arrays, which further propagate via peripheral B-H∙∙∙Cs interactions such that the structure is best viewed as an infinite two-dimensional polymer (Figure 4b). The three unique Al-C bond lengths within compound 3 [Al1-C31 2.127(3); Al2-C63 2.129(3); Al3-C95 2.118(3) Å] are self-consistent but are marginally elongated in comparison to the relevant metrics identified in compounds 1 and 2. It has been established that the C-C bonds within such o-carboranyl clusters can be notably longer than that observed in the unperturbed o-carborane (ca. 1.62 Å). While the C31-C32 bonds of all three of the current derivatives are thus comparably elongated [1, 1.6530(18); 2, 1.730(2); 3, 1.713 Å], these values lie at the low end of the range of C-C distances observed within related derivatives, which can even surpass 1.9 Å [49,50].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Considerations

Except stated otherwise, all the experiments were conducted using the standard Schlenk line and/or glovebox techniques under an inert atmosphere of argon. NMR spectra were recorded with an Agilent ProPulse spectrometer (1H at 400 MHz, 11B at 128 MHz, and 13C at 101 MHz). The spectra are referenced relative to residual protio solvent resonances or an external standard. Elemental analyses were performed at Elemental Microanalysis Ltd., Okehampton, Devon, UK. Solvents were dried by passage through a commercially available solvent purification system and stored under argon in ampoules over 4 Å molecular sieves. Benzene-d6 and THF-d8 were purchased from Merck and dried over a potassium mirror before distilling and storage over molecular sieves. [{SiNDipp}AlK]2 (IVK) [30], [{SiNDipp}AlRb]2 (IVRb), and [{SiNDipp}AlCs]2 (IVCs) [32] were prepared according to reported procedures. Other chemicals were purchased from Merck and used without further purification.

3.2. Syntheses of New Complexes

Synthesis of [{SiNDipp}Al(H)(o-C2B10H11)]K (1): In a J Youngs NMR tube, C6D6 (ca. 0.5 mL) was added to [{SiNDipp}AlK]2 (IVK, 28.0 mg, 0.025 mmol), and ortho-carborane (o-C2H12B10, 7.2 mg, 0.05 mmol) was then added to the bright yellow solution. A gradual decolourisation of the benzene solution from bright yellow to colourless was observed within 10 min, whereupon analysis by 1H NMR spectroscopy indicated complete consumption of the alumanyl starting material. The colourless solution was then transferred into a vial and layered with n-hexane (0.5 mL). Maintenance of the vial at room temperature for 3 days provided crystals of 1 suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis. Colourless crystals were collected and washed with n-hexane (2 × 0.3 mL) before the removal of all volatiles in vacuo to produce 1 as a colourless powder. Yield 27 mg, 77%. No meaningful elemental analysis results were obtained even after multiple attempts. Attempts to dissolve compound 1 in CDCl3 or d8-THF resulted in apparent decomposition. NMR data assigned from the in situ recorded spectra: 1H NMR (400 MHz, 298 K, Benzene-d6) δ 7.02–6.57 (m, 6H, ArH), 4.15 (sept, br, J = 6.8 Hz, 4H, CHMe2), 3.51–1.81 (m, 11H, C2H11B10, where CH can be assigned to a sharp singlet at δH = 3.35, 1H ), 1.50 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H, CHMe2), 1.34 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 12H, CHMe2), 1.32–1.27 (m, 6H, CHMe2), 1.16–1.05 (m, 4H, SiCH2), 0.76–0.37 (br, 6H, SiMe2), 0.34–0.15 (br, 6H, SiMe2). 1H resonance correlated to AlH was not observed. n-hexane and grease impurities were observed. 11B{1H} NMR (128 MHz, 298 K, Benzene-d6) δ −0.5, −3.3, −9.0, −10.9 (spectrum contaminated by o-carborane signals at −2.2, −7.6, −13.6, and −14.9 ppm). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, 298 K, benzene-d6) δ 148.1 (i-C6H3), 147.9 (o-C6H3), 125.0 (m-C6H3), 122.3 (p-C6H3), 63.6 (AlCHB10H11), 27.9 (CHMe2), 27.9 (CHMe2), 25.5 (CHMe2), 14.4 (SiCH2, *overlapping with hexane peak), 3.5 (SiMe2), 0.7 (SiMe2).
Synthesis of [{SiNDipp}Al(H)(o-C2B10H11)]Rb (2): In a J Youngs NMR tube, C6D6 (ca. 0.5 mL) was added to [{SiNDipp}AlRb]2 (IVRb, 30.5 mg, 0.025 mmol), and ortho-carborane (o-C2H12B10, 7.2 mg, 0.05 mmol) was then added to the bright yellow solution. An instantaneous decolourisation of the benzene solution was observed, whereupon analysis by 1H NMR spectroscopy indicated complete conversion of the alumanyl starting material. The colourless solution was then transferred into a vial and layered with n-hexane (0.5 mL). Maintenance of the vial at room temperature for 3 days provided single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis. The colourless crystals were collected and washed with n-hexane (2 × 0.3 mL) before the removal of all volatiles in vacuo to produce 2 as a colourless powder. Yield 26 mg, 69%. Anal. calcd. for C38H74AlB2N2RbSi2 (2.C6H14): C, 60.92%; H, 9.96%; N, 3.74%. Found: 61.15%, H, 10.03%; N, 3.37%. Attempts to dissolve compound 2 in CDCl3 or d8-THF resulted in apparent decomposition. NMR data assigned from the in situ recorded spectra: 1H NMR (400 MHz, 298 K, Benzene-d6) δ 7.08–6.63 (m, 6H, ArH), 4.11 (sept, J = 6.6 Hz, 4H, CHMe2), 3.33 (s, 1H, CH of C2H11B10), 3.05–1.83 (m, 10H, BH of C2H11B10), 1.50 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 9H, CHMe2), 1.31 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 12H, CHMe2), 1.29–1.25 (m, 3H, CHMe2), 1.15–1.00 (m, 4H, SiCH2), 0.75–0.35 (br, 6H, SiMe2), 0.34–0.37 (br, 6H, SiMe2). 1H resonance correlated to AlH was not observed. n-hexane and grease impurities were observed. 11B{1H} NMR (128 MHz, 298 K, Benzene-d6) δ −0.9, −3.3, −9.0, −11.1 (spectrum contaminated by o-carborane signals at −2.2, −7.6, −13.6, and −14.9 ppm). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, 298 K, benzene-d6) δ 148.2 (i-C6H3), 148.0 (o-C6H3), 124.8 (m-C6H3), 122.8 (p-C6H3), 63.3 (AlCHB10H11), 27.9 (CHMe2), 27.9 (CHMe2), 25.6 (CHMe2), 14.4 (SiCH2, *overlapping with hexane peak), 4.5 (SiMe2), 1.4 (SiMe2).
Synthesis of [{SiNDipp}Al(H)(o-C2B10H11)]Cs (3): In a J Youngs NMR tube, C6D6 (ca. 0.5 mL) was added to [{SiNDipp}AlCs]2 (IVCs, 32.8 mg, 0.025 mmol), and ortho-carborane (o-C2H12B10, 7.2 mg, 0.05 mmol) was then added to the bright yellow solution. An instantaneous decolourisation of the benzene solution was observed, and 3 precipitated directly as colourless crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis. The pale pink supernatant was then carefully decanted, and the colourless crystalline solids were washed with n-hexane (2 × 0.3 mL) before the removal of all volatiles in vacuo to produce 3 as a colourless powder. Yield 32 mg, 80% (potentially overestimated due to an amount of [(CH2SiMe2)2NDipp] [30] always present throughout various purification attempts and elemental analysis was, therefore, not attempted). Attempts to dissolve compound 3 in CDCl3 or d8-THF resulted in apparent decomposition. 1H NMR (400 MHz, 298 K, benzene-d6) δ 6.99–6.60 (m, 6H, ArH), 4.14 (sept, J = 6.7 Hz, 4H, CHMe2), 3.35 (s, 1H, HC2H10B10), 1.52 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 12H, CHMe2), 1.34 (dapp, J = 6.7 Hz, 16H, CHMe2 and SiCH2, overlapping peaks), 0.80 (s, 2H, SiMe2?), 0.780.34 (br, 4H, SiMe2), 0.27–ca. −0.25 (br, 6H, SiMe2). 11B{1H} NMR (128 MHz, 298 K, benzene-d6) δ −0.2, −3.3, −7.6, −11.0.13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, 298 K, Benzene-d6) δ 147.9 (i-C6H3), 147.7 (o-C6H3), 124.7 (m-C6H3), 123.7 (p-C6H3), 63.0 (CH of), 28.0 (CHMe2), 27.9 (CHMe2), 26.2 (CHMe2), 14.4 (SiCH2), 4.7 (SiMe2), 2.1 (SiMe2). * [(CH2SiMe2)2NDipp] impurity observed.

4. Conclusions

The kinetic stability provided by the sterically demanding {SiNDipp}2− dianion facilitates the selective oxidative addition of a C-H bond of 1,2-C2B10H12 to the aluminium centre of the group 1 alumanyls (IVM; M = K, Rb, Cs). In each case, these reactions provide a four-coordinate o-carboranyl(hydrido)aluminate anion, [(SiNDipp)Al(H)(1,2-C2B10H11)], in which the carboranyl cage is bonded to aluminium by an unsupported Al-C σ bond. All three compounds further assemble as extended network structures based on Al-H∙∙∙M, B-H∙∙∙M, and C-H∙∙∙M interactions. Each structure is unique due to the significant variation in M+ ionic radius as group 1 is descended.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/inorganics12120309/s1. NMR spectra (Figures S1–S17) and details of the X-ray analysis of compounds 13 (Table S1).

Author Contributions

M.S.H. obtained funding for the study, coordinated and conceptualised the study, and authored the initial draft of the manuscript. H.-Y.L. and K.G.P. synthesised and characterised compounds 13. M.F.M. curated and finalised the X-ray data reported in the paper. All authors contributed to the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

We thank the EPSRC (EP/X01181X/1) for their support in this work.

Data Availability Statement

NMR spectra [51] and crystal data [52,53,54] are given in the Supporting Information. Crystal data and details of the data collection and refinement are given in Table S1. Crystallographic data for 1, 2, and 3, respectively, have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC 2369273, 2369274, 2393518). Copies of this information may be obtained free of charge from The Director, CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EZ, UK (fax: +44-1223-336033; email: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk or http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Holzmann, R.T.; Hughes, R.L.; Smith, I.C.; Lawless, E.W.; Midwest Research, I. Production of the Boranes and Related Research; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1967. [Google Scholar]
  2. Callahan, K.P.; Hawthorne, M.F. Organometallic reactions of 1-ethynyl-1,2-carborane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 4574–4580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yang, X.; Jiang, W.; Knobler, C.B.; Hawthorne, M.F. Rigid-rod molecules: Carborods. Synthesis of tetrameric p-carboranes and the crystal structure of bis(tri-n-butylsilyl)tetra-p-carborane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 9719–9721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Grimes, R.N. Carboranes; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bregadze, V.I. Dicarba-closo-dodecaboranes C2B10H12 and their derivatives. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 209–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zakharkin, L.; Bregadze, V.; Okhlobystin, O.Y. Synthesis of organoelement derivatives of barenes (carboranes). J. Organometal. Chem. 1965, 4, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hlatky, G.G.; Turner, H.W.; Eckman, R.R. Ionic, base-free zirconocene catalysts for ethylene polymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 2728–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Brew, S.A.; Jeffery, J.C.; Mortimer, M.D.; Stone, F.G.A. Alkylidyne(carbaborane) complexes of the group 6 metals. Exo-nido-tungstacarborane compounds. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1992, 8, 1365–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Knobler, C.B.; Marder, T.B.; Mizusawa, E.A.; Teller, R.G.; Long, J.A.; Behnken, P.E.; Hawthorne, M.F. Metallacarboranes in catalysis. 4. Structures of closo- and exo-nido-phosphinerhodacarboranes and a [(PPh3)3Rh]+[nido-7-R-7,8-C2B9H11] salt. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 2990–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bresciani, N.; Calligaris, M.; Delise, P.; Nardin, G.; Randaccio, L. Structure of a sigma-carboranyl complex of platinum(II), sigma-1-(2-phenyl-1,2-dicarbadecahydrododecaboranyl)(tripropylphosphine)[dipropylpropylidenephosphine)platinum(II)]. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 5642–5643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kirillova, N.I.; Klimova, T.V.; Struchkov, Y.T.; Stanko, V.I. X-ray diffraction study of C-monosubstituted derivatives of o-carborane with trimethylsilyl and trimethylgermyl substituents. Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR Div. Chem. Sci. 1981, 30, 442–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhu, B.; Yu, Y.; Chen, J.; Wu, Q.; Liu, Q. Novel Reactions of the Rhenium Carbyne Complex [(η-C5H5)(CO)(COC2HB10H10)ReCC6H5] with Metal Carbonyl Compounds. Crystal Structures of [ReFe(μ-CC6H5)(μ-CO)(CO)3(μ-C5H5)(COC2HB10H10)] and [ReCo23-CC6H5)(μ-CO)2(CO)5(η-C5H5)(C2HB10H10)]. Organometallics 1995, 14, 3963–3969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Morel, P.; Schaffer, P.; Britten, J.F.; Valliant, J.F. Solvent-metal interactions in bis [1,2-dicarba-closo-dodecaboran(12)-1-yl]mercury(II) dichloromethane solvate and bis [1,12-dicarba-closo-dodecaboran(12)-1-yl]mercury(II) tetrahydrofuran solvate. Acta Cryst. C 2002, 58, m601–m604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yamamoto, H.; Sasaki, I.; Shiomi, S.; Yamasaki, N.; Imagawa, H. A Carbaboranylmercuric Salt Catalyzed Reaction; Highly Regioselective Cycloisomerization of 1,3-Dienes. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 2266–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ren, S.; Xie, Z. Reaction of a Zirconocene–Carboryne Complex with Pyridines: Ligand C–H Activation. Organometallics 2011, 30, 5953–5959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cao, B.; Ding, Y.; Fang, F.; Chang, J.; Zhang, J.; Li, S.; Chen, X. The stability of group 10 metal POCOP pincer complexes: Decomposition/reconstruction pathways of the pincer backbone. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 13760–13768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Chambrier, I.; Hughes, D.L.; Jeans, R.J.; Welch, A.J.; Budzelaar, P.H.M.; Bochmann, M. Do Gold(III) Complexes Form Hydrogen Bonds? An Exploration of AuIII Dicarboranyl Chemistry. Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 26, 939–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jayaweera, H.D.A.C.; Rahman, M.M.; Pellechia, P.J.; Smith, M.D.; Peryshkov, D.V. Free three-dimensional carborane carbanions. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 10441–10447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lobanova, I.A.; Bregadze, V.I.; Timofeev, S.V.; Petrovskii, P.V.; Starikova, Z.A.; Dolgushin, F.M. Mercury derivatives of exo-nido-ruthenacarborane. J. Organometal. Chem. 2000, 597, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Churchill, M.R.; Reis, A.H. Crystal structure and molecular geometry of 3-ethyl-3-alumina-1,2-dicarba-closo-dodecaborane(12), 1,2-B9C2H11AlEt. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1972, 13, 1317–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schubert, D.M.; Bandman, M.A.; Rees, W.S., Jr.; Knobler, C.B.; Lu, P.; Nam, W.; Hawthorne, M.F. Synthesis of Group 13 element metallacarboranes and related structure-reactivity correlations. Organometallics 1990, 9, 2046–2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bandman, M.A.; Knobler, C.B.; Hawthorne, M.F. Synthesis and X-ray structure of a symmetrical bis(η5-dicarbollide) aluminium sandwich. Inorg. Chem. 1988, 27, 2399–2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rees, W.S.; Schubert, D.M.; Knobler, C.B.; Hawthorne, M.F. Synthesis and X-ray crystal structure of a novel bimetallic bis(η5-dicarbollide) aluminium sandwich complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 5367–5368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Son, K.-C.; Lee, Y.-J.; Cheong, M.; Ko, J.; Kang, S.O. Constrained-Geometry Aluminium Complexes with η5;η-Coordination:  Syntheses, Structures, and Theoretical Studies of Dicarbollylamino Aluminium(III) Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12086–12087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lee, J.-D.; Kim, S.-K.; Kim, T.-J.; Han, W.-S.; Lee, Y.-J.; Yoo, D.-H.; Cheong, M.; Ko, J.; Kang, S.O. Dicarbollylamine Ligand as a Tunable Template for σ,σ- and π,σ-Bonding Modes: Syntheses, Structures, and Theoretical Studies of η51-Coordinated Constrained-Geometry Group 13 Metal Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9904–9917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sohn, H.; Lee, J.-D. Intramolecularly Stabilized o-Carboranyl Aluminum Complexes: Synthesis, Characterization, and X-ray Structural Studies. Crystals 2023, 13, 877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bregadze, V.I.; Usyatinskii, A.Y.; Antonovich, V.A.; Godovikov, N.N. Reaction of carboranes with alkyl derivatives of group III metals. Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR Div. Chem. Sci. 1988, 37, 570–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Clegg, W.; Brown, D.A.; Bryan, S.J.; Wade, K. Preparation and crystal structure of the dicarboranyl-magnesium bis(dioxane) adduct Mg(2-Me-1,2-C2B10H10)2·2C4H8O2. J. Organometal. Chem. 1987, 325, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pearce, K.G.; Morris, L.J.; Robinson, T.P.; Johnson, A.L.; Mahon, M.F.; Hill, M.S. From alkaline earth to coinage metal carboranyls. Dalton Trans. 2024, 53, 6653–6659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, H.Y.; Schwamm, R.J.; Neale, S.E.; Hill, M.S.; McMullin, C.L.; Mahon, M.F. Reductive Dimerization of CO by a Na/Mg(I) Diamide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 17851–17856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schwamm, R.J.; Coles, M.P.; Hill, M.S.; Mahon, M.F.; McMullin, C.L.; Rajabi, N.A.; Wilson, A.S.S. A Stable Calcium Alumanyl. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 3928–3932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Schwamm, R.J.; Hill, M.S.; Liu, H.Y.; Mahon, M.F.; McMullin, C.L.; Rajabi, N.A. Seven-Membered Cyclic Potassium Diamidoalumanyls. Chem. Eur. J. 2021, 27, 14971–14980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, H.-Y.; Hill, M.S.; Mahon, M.F.; McMullin, C.L.; Schwamm, R.J. Seven-Membered Cyclic Diamidoalumanyls of Heavier Alkali Metals: Structures and C–H Activation of Arenes. Organometallics 2023, 42, 2881–2892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Liu, H.-Y.; Neale, S.E.; Hill, M.S.; Mahon, M.F.; McMullin, C.L.; Richards, E. [{SiNDipp}MgNa]2: A Potent Molecular Reducing Agent. Organometallics 2024, 43, 879–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hill, M.S.; Liu, H.-Y.; Neale, S.E.; Mahon, M.F.; McMullin, C.L.; Morrison, B.L. Cooperative Dihydrogen Activation at a Na(I)2/Mg(I)2 Ensemble. Chem. Commun. 2023, 59, 3846–3849. [Google Scholar]
  36. Liu, H.-Y.; Mahon, M.F.; Hill, M.S. Aluminium–Boron Bond Formation by Boron Ester Oxidative Addition at an Alumanyl Anion. Inorg. Chem. 2023, 62, 15310–15319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, H.-Y.; Shere, H.T.W.; Neale, S.E.; Hill, M.S.; Mahon, M.F.; McMullin, C.L. Terminal Alkyne Activation by an Al(I)-centred Anion: Impact on Mechanism of Alkali Metal Identity. Organometallics, 2024; in press. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kashin, A.N.; Butin, K.P.; Stanko, V.I.; Beletskaya, I.P. Acidity of ortho-, meta-, and para-barenes. Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR Div. Chem. Sci. 1969, 18, 1775–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Poater, J.; Viñas, C.; Escayola, S.; Solà, M.; Teixidor, F. Pioneering the Power of Twin Bonds in a Revolutionary Double Bond Formation. Unveiling the True Identity of o-Carboryne as o-Carborene. Chem. Eur. J. 2023, 29, e202302448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rüttger, F.; Stalke, D.; John, M. Resonance and structural assignment in (car)borane clusters using 11B residual quadrupolar couplings. Chem. Commun. 2023, 59, 14657–14660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Reddy, N.D.; Roesky, H.W.; Noltemeyer, M.; Schmidt, H.-G. Reactions of AlH3·NMe3 with Nitriles:  Structural Characterization and Substitution Reactions of Hexameric Aluminium Imides. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 2374–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kumar, S.S.; Reddy, N.D.; Roesky, H.W.; Vidovic, D.; Magull, J.; Winter, R.F. Synthesis, Structure, and Cyclic Voltammetric Studies of [CpFeC5H4C⋮CAlNCH2(C4H3S)]6:  The First Model Compound for the Fixation of Metal-Containing Ligands on an Aluminium Nitride Cluster. Organometallics 2003, 22, 3348–3350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhu, H.P.; Chai, J.F.; Fan, H.J.; Roesky, H.W.; He, C.; Jancik, V.; Schmidt, H.G.; Noltemeyer, M.; Merrill, W.A.; Power, P.R. A stable aluminacyclopropene LA1(η2-2H2) and its end-on azide insertion to an aluminaazacyclobutene. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5090–5093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wu, B.; Yang, X.-J. Reactions of α-diimine-aluminium complexes with sodium alkynides: Versatile structures of aluminium σ-alkynide complexes. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 13671–13680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhu, H.P.; Oswald, R.B.; Fan, H.J.; Roesky, H.W.; Ma, Q.J.; Yang, Z.; Schmidt, H.G.; Noltemeyer, M.; Starke, K.; Hosmane, N.S. Aluminacyclopropene: Syntheses, characterization, and reactivity toward terminal alkynes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5100–5108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zheng, W.; Hohmeister, H.; Mösch-Zanetti, N.C.; Roesky, H.W.; Noltemeyer, M.; Schmidt, H.-G. Syntheses and Characterization of μ,η11-3,5-Di-tert-butylpyrazolato Derivatives of Aluminium. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 2363–2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zheng, W.; Mösch-Zanetti, N.C.; Roesky, H.W.; Hewitt, M.; Cimpoesu, F.; Schneider, T.R.; Stasch, A.; Prust, J. The First Structurally Characterized Aluminium Compounds with Terminal Acetylide Groups. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3099–3101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Shannon, R.D. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Cryst. A 1976, 32, 751–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Oliva, J.M.; Allan, N.L.; Schleyer, P.v.R.; Vinas, C.; Teixidor, F. Strikingly Long C-C Distances in 1,2-Disubstituted ortho-Carboranes and Their Dianions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 13538–13547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, J.; Pang, R.; Li, Z.; Lai, G.; Xiao, X.-Q.; Müller, T. Exceptionally Long C-CSingle Bonds in Diamino-o-carborane as Induced by NegativeHyperconjugation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 1397–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Alekseyeva, E.S.; Batsanov, A.S.; Boyd, L.A.; Fox, M.A.; Hibbert, T.G.; Howard, J.A.K.; MacBridge, J.A.H.; Mackinnon, A.; Wade, K. Intra- and inter-molecular carboranyl C–H⋯N hydrogen bonds in pyridyl-containing ortho-carboranes. Dalton Trans. 2003, 475–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dolomanov, O.V.; Bourhis, L.J.; Gildea, R.J.; Howard, J.A.K.; Puschmann, H. OLEX2: A Complete Structure Solution, Refinement and Analysis Program. J. Appl. Cryst. 2009, 42, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT-Integrated Space-Group and Crystal-Structure Determination. Acta Cryst. 2015, A71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal Structure Refinement with SHELXL. Acta Cryst. 2015, C71, 3–8. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Synthesis of [(BDI)Ae(o-C2B10H11)] (I and II) through the deprotonation of 1,2-C2B10H12; (b) the structure of compound III; (c) the structures of IVM and their reactivity with terminal alkynes.
Figure 1. (a) Synthesis of [(BDI)Ae(o-C2B10H11)] (I and II) through the deprotonation of 1,2-C2B10H12; (b) the structure of compound III; (c) the structures of IVM and their reactivity with terminal alkynes.
Inorganics 12 00309 g001
Scheme 1. Synthesis of compounds 13.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of compounds 13.
Inorganics 12 00309 sch001
Figure 2. Plot depicting the polymeric structure of 1. Ellipsoids are shown at 30% probability. A molecule of benzene solvent and hydrogen atoms (H1 and those attached to C32, B2, and B3 excepted) have been omitted for clarity. Peripheral substituents are depicted as wireframes, also for visual ease. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Al1-N1 1.8905(11), Al1-N2 1.8776(11), Al1-C31 2.0804(14), C31-C32 1.6530(18), C31-B1 1.733(2), C31-B2 1.7090(19), C31-B3 1.7260(19), C31-B4 1.744(2), C32-B1 1.691(2), C32-B4 1.696(2), C32-B8 1.696(2), C32-B9 1.703(2), N2-Al1-N1 113.32(5), N1-Al1-C31 114.25(5), and N2-Al1-C31 111.13(5). Symmetry operations: 1 x, 1 − y, ½ + z; 2 x, 1 − y, −½ + z.
Figure 2. Plot depicting the polymeric structure of 1. Ellipsoids are shown at 30% probability. A molecule of benzene solvent and hydrogen atoms (H1 and those attached to C32, B2, and B3 excepted) have been omitted for clarity. Peripheral substituents are depicted as wireframes, also for visual ease. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Al1-N1 1.8905(11), Al1-N2 1.8776(11), Al1-C31 2.0804(14), C31-C32 1.6530(18), C31-B1 1.733(2), C31-B2 1.7090(19), C31-B3 1.7260(19), C31-B4 1.744(2), C32-B1 1.691(2), C32-B4 1.696(2), C32-B8 1.696(2), C32-B9 1.703(2), N2-Al1-N1 113.32(5), N1-Al1-C31 114.25(5), and N2-Al1-C31 111.13(5). Symmetry operations: 1 x, 1 − y, ½ + z; 2 x, 1 − y, −½ + z.
Inorganics 12 00309 g002
Figure 3. Plot depicting the dimeric structure of 2. Ellipsoids are shown at 30% probability. Hydrogen atoms (H1 and those attached to C32, B4, B9, and B10 excepted) have been omitted for clarity. Some peripheral substituents are depicted as wireframes, also for visual ease. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Al1-N1 1.8928(15), Al1-N2 1.8673(14), Al1-C31 2.1018(16), C31-C32 1.730(2), C31-B1 1.742(2), C31-B2 1.661(2), C31-B3 1.728(3), C31-B4 1.712(2), C32-B1 1.752(3), C32-B4 1.756(3), C32-B9 1.778(3), N2-Al1-N1 113.60(6), N1-Al1-C31 113.56(7), and N2-Al1-C31 110.88(6). Symmetry operations to generate equivalent atoms: 1 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z.
Figure 3. Plot depicting the dimeric structure of 2. Ellipsoids are shown at 30% probability. Hydrogen atoms (H1 and those attached to C32, B4, B9, and B10 excepted) have been omitted for clarity. Some peripheral substituents are depicted as wireframes, also for visual ease. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Al1-N1 1.8928(15), Al1-N2 1.8673(14), Al1-C31 2.1018(16), C31-C32 1.730(2), C31-B1 1.742(2), C31-B2 1.661(2), C31-B3 1.728(3), C31-B4 1.712(2), C32-B1 1.752(3), C32-B4 1.756(3), C32-B9 1.778(3), N2-Al1-N1 113.60(6), N1-Al1-C31 113.56(7), and N2-Al1-C31 110.88(6). Symmetry operations to generate equivalent atoms: 1 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z.
Inorganics 12 00309 g003
Figure 4. (a) Plot depicting the structure of 3. Ellipsoids are shown at 30% probability. Occluded benzene solvent, disordered atoms, and hydrogen atoms (H1 and those attached to C32 and selected B atoms excepted) have been omitted for clarity. Some peripheral substituents are depicted as wireframes, also for visual ease. Symmetry operations to generate equivalent atoms: 1 2 − x, 2 − y, 2 − z. (b) Plot depicting a section of the hexacyclic motifs that dominate the two-dimensional sheets present in 3. Hydrogen atoms, except those attached to the carboranyl cage, have been removed and iso-propyl substituents are shown as wireframes for visual ease. Colour scheme adopted as for (a). Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Al1-N1 1.888(3), Al1-N2 1.867(3), Al1-C31 2.127(3), C31-C32 1.713(5), C31-B1 1.733(5), C31-B4 1.733(4), C31-B5 1.726(5), C32-B1 1.759(5), C32-B4 1.756(3), N2-Al1-N1 114.32(12), N1-Al1-C31 115.10(12), and N2-Al1-C31 110.19(12).
Figure 4. (a) Plot depicting the structure of 3. Ellipsoids are shown at 30% probability. Occluded benzene solvent, disordered atoms, and hydrogen atoms (H1 and those attached to C32 and selected B atoms excepted) have been omitted for clarity. Some peripheral substituents are depicted as wireframes, also for visual ease. Symmetry operations to generate equivalent atoms: 1 2 − x, 2 − y, 2 − z. (b) Plot depicting a section of the hexacyclic motifs that dominate the two-dimensional sheets present in 3. Hydrogen atoms, except those attached to the carboranyl cage, have been removed and iso-propyl substituents are shown as wireframes for visual ease. Colour scheme adopted as for (a). Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Al1-N1 1.888(3), Al1-N2 1.867(3), Al1-C31 2.127(3), C31-C32 1.713(5), C31-B1 1.733(5), C31-B4 1.733(4), C31-B5 1.726(5), C32-B1 1.759(5), C32-B4 1.756(3), N2-Al1-N1 114.32(12), N1-Al1-C31 115.10(12), and N2-Al1-C31 110.19(12).
Inorganics 12 00309 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, H.-Y.; Pearce, K.G.; Hill, M.S.; Mahon, M.F. Oxidative Addition to Group 1 (K, Rb, Cs) Alumanyl Anions as a Route to o-Carboranyl (hydrido)aluminates. Inorganics 2024, 12, 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics12120309

AMA Style

Liu H-Y, Pearce KG, Hill MS, Mahon MF. Oxidative Addition to Group 1 (K, Rb, Cs) Alumanyl Anions as a Route to o-Carboranyl (hydrido)aluminates. Inorganics. 2024; 12(12):309. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics12120309

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Han-Ying, Kyle G. Pearce, Michael S. Hill, and Mary F. Mahon. 2024. "Oxidative Addition to Group 1 (K, Rb, Cs) Alumanyl Anions as a Route to o-Carboranyl (hydrido)aluminates" Inorganics 12, no. 12: 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics12120309

APA Style

Liu, H.-Y., Pearce, K. G., Hill, M. S., & Mahon, M. F. (2024). Oxidative Addition to Group 1 (K, Rb, Cs) Alumanyl Anions as a Route to o-Carboranyl (hydrido)aluminates. Inorganics, 12(12), 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics12120309

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop