Next Article in Journal
Closed Form Analytic Expressions for the Evanescent and Traveling Components of the Electromagnetic Green Function and for Defocused Hemispherical Focusing of Electromagnetic Waves
Previous Article in Journal
Thermo-Mechanical Characterization of the Orthorhombic Nonlinear Optical Crystal PbGa2GeSe6
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ensquared Energy and Optical Centroid Efficiency in Optical Sensors: Part 2, Primary Aberrations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Introduction to Special Issue on “Advances in 3OM: Opto-Mechatronics, Opto-Mechanics, and Optical Metrology”

by
Virgil-Florin Duma
1,2,3,*,
Guillermo Garcia-Torales
4 and
Tomohiko Hayakawa
5
1
3OM Optomechatronics Group, Department of Measurements and Optical Electronics, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications, and Information Technology, Polytechnic University of Timisoara, 2 Vasile Parvan Ave., 300223 Timisoara, Romania
2
Faculty of Engineering, “Aurel Vlaicu” University of Arad, 2 Elena Dragoi Street, 310177 Arad, Romania
3
Center of Research and Development for Mechatronics, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania
4
Departamento de Electro-Fotónica, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara (U. de G.), Blvd. M. García Barragán 1421, Guadalajara 44410, Jalisco, Mexico
5
Research Institute for Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8601, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Photonics 2025, 12(6), 557; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12060557
Submission received: 24 May 2025 / Revised: 29 May 2025 / Accepted: 30 May 2025 / Published: 1 June 2025

1. Introduction

The 3OM concept was introduced in 2008 and combines three complementary domains: opto-mechatronics, opto-mechanics, and optical metrology.
Opto-Mechatronics was introduced in 2005 by Prof. Hyungsuck Cho in a seminal book with the same name [1]. It combines optics and mechatronics, the latter of which is a blend of precision mechanics, electronics, control, and automation, as well as IT. This multidisciplinary approach is beneficial in the engineering and design of complex systems, adding value to each of the component fields. A good example can be seen in the form of laser scanning techniques [2,3], which involve, for example, galvanometer-based [4,5,6], polygon mirror [7,8,9], or Risley prisms [10,11,12,13] and can be designed for a wide range of applications, from commercial to industrial and high-end purposes. These include applications in areas as diverse as biomedical imaging [14] and remote sensing [15].
Opto-Mechanics addresses positioning issues and errors in optical components [16,17] and tolerances of both mechanical and optical parts, as well as methods for tackling these aspects. Researchers in this field strive to fill the gap between the high (theoretical) precision and requirements of optical design and the practical capabilities that are inherent in mechanical technologies [2]. Another aspect that is often overlooked is related to the kinematics and dynamics of systems with optical moving parts (i.e., mirrors, lenses, and prisms). This imposes finite element analyses (FEAs), especially of fast-moving (for example, rotational) parts, in order to control structural integrity issues, as well as deformation levels [3,9]. FEAs and various other mechanical analyses are necessary, even for systems with non-moving or slow-moving (but large and heavy) optical parts (and mounts), for example, with refractive elements (e.g., Risley prisms [18]) or segmented mirrors [19]. These aspects bridge opto-mechanics and opto-mechatronics. This relationship is strengthened by the necessity for control and automation (as included in mechatronics) in (precise positioning and displacements in) systems with moving components [20,21,22].
Optical Metrology comprises a wide area of applications that are related to both domains above, especially opto-mechatronics. It includes domains that range from industrial measurements to imaging, with the latter being used both in industry, with non-destructive testing (NDT), and in the biomedical field, with a wide range of techniques, for example, optical coherence tomography (OCT) [23,24,25], confocal microscopy [26], or photoacoustics.
3OM also enhances laser manufacturing, which, in turn, implies robotics, machine vision, and machine learning, the latter with AI algorithms. Besides biomedical imaging, it is closely connected to various laser techniques in medicine. Finally, its field of interest extends to include remote sensing, as well as security and defense.
Regarding devices and specific technologies, we must highlight the rapidly evolving field of micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMSs), which has applications in all the above fields [24,27,28,29,30].

2. An Overview of the Articles in This Special Issue

In the work described in Contribution 1, the reflectivity of a cholesteric liquid crystal was numerically investigated for an anisotropic defect layer inside. The optical phenomena were modeled for different parameters of the system, as well as adjusting the external applied electric field. The possibilities of controlling the reflection spectrum were obtained.
The authors of Contribution 2 studied a shock wave that may be induced with a high-power laser pulse. A theoretical model of laser material processing was developed, with experimental validation via piezo-resistive methods. The field of laser micromachining was also approached in Contribution 3 for laser drilling. Optical detection achieved a >95% accuracy for tens-of-micrometer-deep holes with a micrometer diameter. Contribution 4 focuses on optical vortices (i.e., ultra-intense laser pulses with helical phases), assessing their field distributions.
The authors of Contribution 5 approached an opto-mechatronic device, introducing and demonstrating a low-cost 3D-printed 1-DOF laser scanner. Its parameters were determined and validated experimentally, offering an alternative to the more expensive (and most common) galvanometer scanners.
Optical metrology was targeted for Contribution 6, with the Digital Image Correlation (DIC) method used for displacement- and stress–strain-invariant deformation measurements. A reverse retrieval strategy was also developed. The DIC measurements allowed for robust and efficient displacement invariance measurement, with an average accuracy of 0.1% observed for the stress–strain results.
A system development is proposed in Contribution 7, with a broadband mode coupler for multimode OCT in the O-band (1.26–1.36 μm). Key design parameters were studied. Reflected signals from the sample were separated using the same fiber device before interfering with the reference light, which had not been previously possible. The proposed fiber device is expected to represent a key component in efficiently achieving multimode OCT operation with better signal collection efficiency and improved penetration depth for deep tissue imaging.
Contribution 8 explores high-performance focal plane arrays and their fields of application, including remote sensing, astronomical, and surveillance instruments. Whereas in the analysis of an instrument performance analysis, it is assumed that the image of a point source is at the center of a detector pixel, in reality, it may fall at any position in the detector pixel. Pointing errors and jitter may lead to errors of up to 20%. Critical factors that impact the performance estimate include the optical centroid efficiency (OCE) and the ensquared energy (i.e., the energy on the rectangular detector pixel (EOD)). Simulations were performed for imaging with and without a generalized rectangular central obscuration. Contribution 10 represents the second part of this study, analyzing the performance of the OCE vs. the EOD. The three Seidel primary aberrations of an optical component (i.e., spherical, coma, and astigmatism, plus defocus) were considered. The study concluded that the choice of the larger pixel might be advantageous for low-aberration instruments in dynamic and unpredictable environments. Thus, for pixels larger than a certain threshold, a small pixel shows better performance in the face of jitter, misalignment, and other environmental conditions.
The authors of Contribution 9 utilized computer simulations to approach microstructure observations using speckle interferometry. This study demonstrates that the separation of two close points is not impossible when coherent light is used. The condition examined comprised different light phases between the two points. This discussion on the resolution of microstructure observations based on speckle interferometry led to a new interpretation of the Rayleigh criterion in super-resolution techniques.

3. Conclusions

In summary, 3OM research is multidisciplinary, bridging several optical, mechanical, and electrical engineering fields. The ten contributions to this Special Issue represent an enticing taster of the many areas of interest involving 3OM. Two of the works were prepared for the second edition of the International Conference Advances in 3OM [31]. During the publishing process, the third edition of this Conference was under development [32], and, linked to it, the second edition of this Special Issue of Photonics was launched [33]. Another Special Issue, this time of Sensors, also addresses a 3OM topic of high interest: laser scanning and its various applications [34]. We hope that these Special Issues offer readers an insight into these fields and inspire scholars to contribute to advancing our knowledge on these topics for the benefit of humankind.

Funding

V.-F. Duma was funded during the development of this Special Issue by the Romanian Ministry of Research, Innovation, and Digitization, CNCS/CCCDI–UEFISCDI, projects PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2020-2600 and PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2020-4423, both within PNCDI III (http://3om-group-optomechatronics.ro/, accessed on 1 April 2025). This research is currently supported by the Romanian IPCEI (Important Project of Common European Interest) on microelectronics, via Polytechnic University of Timisoara and Continental Automotive Romania, as well as by the European Union through COST Action CA21159 (PhoBioS).

Acknowledgments

The Guest Editors of this Special Issue, “Advances in 3OM: Opto-Mechatronics, Opto-Mechanics, and Optical Metrology”, would like to express our sincere thanks and deep appreciation to all authors published in this Special Issue for their contribution to its success. We also thank our reviewers, as well as the Photonics editors and staff for their outstanding support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

List of Contributions

  • Grzelczyk, D.; Awrejcewicz, J. Reflectivity of Cholesteric Liquid Crystals with an Anisotropic Defect Layer Inside. Photonics 2020, 7, 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics7030058.
  • Gonzalez-Romero, R.; Strojnik, M.; Garcia-Torales, G.; Gomez-Rosas, G. Frequency Dependence of a Piezo-Resistive Method for Pressure Measurements of Laser-Induced Shock Waves in Solids. Photonics 2021, 8, 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8040120.
  • Chen, X.; Xu, Y.; Chen, N.-K.; Shy, S.; Chui, H.-C. In Situ Depth Measurement of Laser Micromachining. Photonics 2021, 8, 493. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8110493.
  • Talposi, A.-M.; Iancu, V.; Ursescu, D. Influence of Spatio-Temporal Couplings on Focused Optical Vortices. Photonics 2022, 9, 389. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics9060389.
  • Shen, C.-K.; Huang, Y.-N.; Liu, G.-Y.; Tsui, W.-A.; Cheng, Y.-W.; Yeh, P.-H.; Tsai, J.-c. Low-Cost 3D-Printed Electromagnetically Driven Large-Area 1-DOF Optical Scanners. Photonics 2022, 9, 484. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics9070484.
  • Jain, A.; Mishra, A.; Tiwari, V.; Singh, G.; Singh, R.P.; Singh, S. Deformation Measurement of a SS304 Stainless Steel Sheet Using Digital Image Correlation Method. Photonics 2022, 9, 912. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics9120912.
  • Hu, D.J.J.; Liu, L.; Dong, H.; Zhang, H. Design of a Broadband Fiber Optic Mode Coupler for Multimode Optical Coherence Tomography. Photonics 2023, 10, 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10020162.
  • Strojnik, M.; Bravo-Medina, B.; Martin, R.; Wang, Y. Ensquared Energy and Optical Centroid Efficiency in Optical Sensors: Part 1, Theory. Photonics 2023, 10, 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10030254.
  • Arai, Y.; Chen, T. Simulation-Based Considerations on the Rayleigh Criterion in Super-Resolution Techniques Based on Speckle Interferometry. Photonics 2023, 10, 374. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10040374.
  • Strojnik, M.; Martin, R.; Wang, Y. Ensquared Energy and Optical Centroid Efficiency in Optical Sensors: Part 2, Primary Aberrations. Photonics 2024, 11, 855. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11090855.

References

  1. Cho, H. Optomechatronics: Fusion of Optical and Mechatronic Engineering, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Beiser, L.; Johnson, B. Scanners. In Handbook of Optics, 3rd ed.; Bass, M., Ed.; McGraw Hill Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 30.1–30.68. [Google Scholar]
  3. Marshall, G.F.; Stutz, G.E. (Eds.) Handbook of Optical and Laser Scanning, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  4. Li, Y. Single-mirror beam steering system: Analysis and synthesis of high-order conic-section scan patterns. Appl. Opt. 2008, 47, 386–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Montagu, J. Scanners-galvanometric and resonant. In Encyclopedia of Optical and Photonic Engineering; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2003; pp. 2465–2487. [Google Scholar]
  6. Duma, V.-F. Laser scanners with oscillatory elements: Design and optimization of 1D and 2D scanning functions. Appl. Math. Model. 2019, 67, 456–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, Y.; Katz, J. Asymmetric distribution of the scanned field of a rotating reflective polygon. Appl. Opt. 1997, 36, 342–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Oh, W.Y.; Yun, S.H.; Tearney, G.J.; Bouma, B.E. 115 kHz tuning repetition rate ultrahigh-speed wavelength-swept semiconductor laser. Opt. Lett. 2005, 30, 3159–3161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Duma, V.-F.; Duma, M.-A. Optomechanical Analysis and Design of Polygon Mirror-Based Laser Scanners. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 5592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, Y. Analytic solution of free space optical beam steering using Risley prisms. J. Light. Technol. 2008, 26, 3576–3583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhou, Y.; Fan, D.; Fan, S.; Chen, Y.; Liu, G. Laser scanning by rotating polarization gratings. Appl. Opt. 2016, 55, 5149–5157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, A.; Yi, W.; Zuo, Q.; Sun, W. Performance characterization of scanning beam steered by tilting double prisms. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 23543–23556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Duma, V.-F.; Dimb, A.-L. Exact Scan Patterns of Rotational Risley Prisms Obtained with a Graphical Method: Multi-Parameter Analysis and Design. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Leung, M.K.K.; Mariampillai, A.; Standish, B.A.; Lee, K.K.C.; Munce, N.R.; Vitkin, I.A.; Yang, V.X.D. High-power wavelength-swept laser in Littman telescope-less polygon filter and dual-amplifier configuration for multichannel optical coherence tomography. Opt. Lett. 2009, 34, 2814–2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, A.; Liu, X.; Sun, J.; Lu, Z. Risley-prism-based multi-beam scanning LiDAR for high-resolution three-dimensional imaging. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2022, 150, 106836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bravo-Medina, B.; Strojnik, M.; Garcia-Torales, G.; Torres-Ortega, H.; Estrada-Marmolejo, R.; Beltrán-González, A.; Flores, J.L. Error compensation in a pointing system based on Risley prisms. Appl. Opt. 2017, 56, 2209–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ge, Y.; Liu, J.; Xue, F.; Guan, E.; Yan, W.; Zhao, Y. Effect of mechanical error on dual-wedge laser scanning system and error correction. Appl. Opt. 2018, 57, 6047–6054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, A.; Jiang, X.; Sun, J.; Bian, Y.; Wang, L.; Liu, L. Radial support analysis for large-aperture rotating wedge prism. Opt. Laser Technol. 2012, 44, 1881–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhao, K.; Song, L.; Sun, D.; Huang, Q.; Guo, R.; Tian, G.; He, J. Design and Research of Large-Scale Curvature Adjustment Optical Mirror. Photonics 2025, 12, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yoo, H.W.; Ito, S.; Schitter, G. High speed laser scanning microscopy by iterative learning control of a galvanometer scanner. Control. Eng. Pract. 2016, 50, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hayakawa, T.; Watanabe, T.; Senoo, T.; Ishikawa, M. Gain-compensated sinusoidal scanning of a galvanometer mirror in proportional-integral-differential control using the pre-emphasis technique for motion-blur compensation. Appl. Opt. 2016, 55, 5640–5646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xiao, H.; Jiang, T.; Chen, X. Rejecting fast narrow-band disturbances with slow sensor feedback for quality beam steering in selective laser sintering. Mechatronics 2018, 56, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Drexler, W.; Liu, M.; Kumar, A.; Kamali, T.; Unterhuber, A.; Leitgeb, R.A. Optical coherence tomography today: Speed, contrast, and multimodality. J. Biomed. Opt. 2014, 19, 071412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lu, C.D.; Kraus, M.F.; Potsaid, B.; Liu, J.J.; Choi, W.; Jayaraman, V.; Cable, A.E.; Hornegger, J.; Duker, J.S.; Fujimoto, J.G. Handheld ultrahigh speed swept source optical coherence tomography instrument using a MEMS scanning mirror. Biomed. Opt. Express 2014, 5, 293–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Monroy, G.L.; Won, J.; Spillman, D.R.; Dsouza, R.; Boppart, S.A. Clinical translation of handheld optical coherence tomography: Practical considerations and recent advancements. J. Biomed. Opt. 2017, 22, 121715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Warger, W.C., II; DiMarzio, C.A. Dual-wedge scanning confocal reflectance microscope. Opt. Lett. 2007, 32, 2140–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mu, X.; Zhou, G.; Yu, H.; Du, Y.; Feng, H.; Tsai, J.M.L.; Chau, F.S. Compact MEMS-driven pyramidal polygon reflector for circumferential scanned endoscopic imaging probe. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 6325–6339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Strathman, M.; Liu, Y.; Keeler, E.G.; Song, M.; Baran, U.; Xi, J.; Sun, M.-T.; Wang, R.; Li, X.; Lin, L.Y. MEMS scanning micromirror for optical coherence tomography. Biomed. Opt. Express 2015, 6, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pan, T.; Gao, X.; Yang, H.; Cao, Y.; Zhao, H.; Chen, Q.; Xi, H. A MEMS Mirror-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscope with Image Distortion Correction. IEEE Photonics J. 2023, 15, 3900408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gora, M.J.; Suter, M.J.; Tearney, G.J.; Li, X. Endoscopic optical coherence tomography: Technologies and clinical applications [Invited]. Biomed. Opt. Express 2017, 8, 2405–2444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. 2nd International Conference ‘Advances in 3OM’ 2023. Available online: https://3om-group-optomechatronics.ro/advances-in-3om-conference-2023/ (accessed on 17 May 2025).
  32. 3OM Optomechatronics Group. Available online: https://3om-group-optomechatronics.ro/home/ (accessed on 17 May 2025).
  33. ‘Advances in 3OM: Opto-Mechatronics, Opto-Mechanics and Optical Metrology’ Special Issue in Photonics, 2nd ed. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/photonics/special_issues/NS5DPR2QS9 (accessed on 17 May 2025).
  34. ‘Laser Scanning and Applications’ Special Issue in Sensors. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors/special_issues/1W05Q2ZEC8 (accessed on 17 May 2025).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Duma, V.-F.; Garcia-Torales, G.; Hayakawa, T. Introduction to Special Issue on “Advances in 3OM: Opto-Mechatronics, Opto-Mechanics, and Optical Metrology”. Photonics 2025, 12, 557. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12060557

AMA Style

Duma V-F, Garcia-Torales G, Hayakawa T. Introduction to Special Issue on “Advances in 3OM: Opto-Mechatronics, Opto-Mechanics, and Optical Metrology”. Photonics. 2025; 12(6):557. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12060557

Chicago/Turabian Style

Duma, Virgil-Florin, Guillermo Garcia-Torales, and Tomohiko Hayakawa. 2025. "Introduction to Special Issue on “Advances in 3OM: Opto-Mechatronics, Opto-Mechanics, and Optical Metrology”" Photonics 12, no. 6: 557. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12060557

APA Style

Duma, V.-F., Garcia-Torales, G., & Hayakawa, T. (2025). Introduction to Special Issue on “Advances in 3OM: Opto-Mechatronics, Opto-Mechanics, and Optical Metrology”. Photonics, 12(6), 557. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12060557

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop