Next Article in Journal
Hybrid Physical-Data Modeling Approach for Surface Scattering Characteristics of Low-Gloss Black Paint
Previous Article in Journal
The Transition of Luminescent Materials and Conductive Electrodes in Upconversion Devices to Flexible Architectures
Previous Article in Special Issue
Extending the ICESAT-2 ATLAS Lidar Capabilities to Other Planets Within Our Solar System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tunable-Charge Optical Vortices Through Edge Diffraction of a High-Order Hermit-Gaussian Mode Laser

School of Optical-Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, No. 516 Jun Gong Road, Shanghai 200093, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contribute equally to this work.
Photonics 2025, 12(11), 1076; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12111076
Submission received: 30 September 2025 / Revised: 24 October 2025 / Accepted: 28 October 2025 / Published: 30 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Solid-State Laser Technology and Applications)

Abstract

An optical vortex is a typical structured light field characterized by a helical wavefront and a central phase singularity. With its expanding applications in modern information technology, the demand for generating vortex beams with diverse topological charges continues to grow. Existing methods for modulating the topological charges of vortex beams involve complex operations and high costs. This study proposes a novel approach to modulate the topological charges of optical vortices through edge diffraction of a high-order Hermit–Gaussian (HG) mode laser. First, a high-order HG mode laser is built using off-axis pumping configuration. By selectively obscuring specific lobes of the high-order HG beam, various optical vortices are generated using a cylindrical lens mode converter. The topological charge can be continuously tuned by controlling the number of obscured lobes. This method substantially improves the efficiency of topological charge modulation, while also enabling the generation of fractional vortex states. These advancements show potential in mode-division-multiplexed optical communications and encryption.

1. Introduction

An optical vortex with a quantized topological charge is a typical structured light beam that carries orbital angular momentum (OAM) [1], characterized by a helical wavefront [2] and a central phase singularity. Owing to this unique property, vortex beams [3] have found expanding applications in optical communications [4,5], optical tweezers [6,7,8,9], imaging [10,11,12], sensing [13,14], and other fields [15], where the manipulation of topological charges [16] has played critical roles. For instance, in optical communications, employing vortex beams with various topological charges as independent channels for parallel data transmission can enhance the capacity by tens to hundreds of times [5]. In holography, vortex beams with distinct topological charges provide independent information channels, enabling multidimensional and high-security information encryption [17,18]. Therefore, the generation of diverse high-order vortex beams holds significant potential in modern information technology.
Currently, the topological charges of optical vortices are mainly manipulated [19] using extra-cavity or intra-cavity methods. Extra-cavity-based methods predominantly employ spatial phase elements, such as a spatial light modulator (SLM) [20] or a spiral phase plate (SPP) [2]. SLMs are characterized by high manufacturing costs and relatively slow response speeds due to the intrinsic response time of liquid crystal molecules. SPPs generate optical vortices by controlling the optical path difference through varying material thickness. This fundamental principle dictates that a single SPP can only generate a single vortex beam with a fixed topological charge [21,22]. Alerting the topological charge requires physical replacement of the element. By tailoring the cavity structure, laser transverse modes with controllable orders can also be directly generated within the resonator [23]. Typical methods include off-axis pumping [24] and etching patterns on cavity mirrors [25]. Off-axis pumping technology enables continuous modulation of the topological charges of vortex beams. Nevertheless, this approach requires precise control of the pump size and position, which limits its flexibility. As for the mirror surface etching technique, the topological charge is adjusted by physically moving the cavity mirror to align with a different etching spot. This operation is difficult to achieve continuous modulation of the topological charges.
In this work, we propose a simple method for tuning the topological charges of optical vortices via edge diffraction using a fixed high-order Hermit–Gaussian (HG) mode laser. Firstly, a high-order HG beam is generated directly from a laser through the off-axis pumping method. Subsequently, by selectively obscuring specific lobes of the high-order HG beam using an aperture, optical vortices with various topological charges are produced using a single-cylindrical-lens mode converter. The topological charge can be continuously tuned by adjusting the number of obscured lobes. This work employs a fixed laser output mode to generate optical vortices with tunable orders in a simple and efficient manner, significantly improving the flexibility and efficiency of topological charge modulation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Setup

To generate optical vortices with continuously tunable topological charges, an experimental setup was constructed, as illustrated in Figure 1. A high-order HG mode laser was built using an off-axis pumping scheme. In detail, an 808 nm pump beam was collimated by lens L1 and focused through lens L2 into an Nd: YVO4 crystal. The focal lengths of L1 and L2 were 100 mm and 125 mm, respectively. As shown in Figure 1a, the resonator consists of a concave mirror M1 with a curvature radius of −100 mm, an output coupler (OC) with a transmittance of 2%, and a Nd: YVO4 crystal with 3 × 3 × 5 mm3 and a doping concentration of 0.5%. By tilting M1 to achieve off-axis pumping, a high-order HG beam was generated. Firstly, the HG mode was converted to an optical vortex using a single-cylindrical-lens mode converter. Thereafter, a single-side aperture was introduced to obscure a specific number of lobes of the HG beam to facilitate a lower-order transverse mode. Subsequently, a lower-charge optical vortex was obtained. In order to characterize the spatial phase of an optical vortex, a Mach–Zehnder interferometer was implemented by splitting the output laser beam into two paths [26]. In the upper path, an optical vortex was obtained using a single-cylindrical-lens mode converter. In the bottom path, one lobe of the high-order HG mode beam was used to interfere with the optical vortex. In the two paths, several lenses were used to control the beam sizes, in which the focal lengths of L3, L4, L5, L6, L7, and L8 were 300 mm, 500 mm, 50 mm, 300 mm, 500 mm, and 50 mm, respectively. In addition, the focal length of the cylindrical lens (CL) was 50 mm. The intensity distributions of HG modes, vortex modes, and interference patterns were recorded using a CCD camera.

2.2. Simulations

In this work, optical vortices with various topological charges were obtained via edge diffraction using a fixed high-order HG mode beam, where an aperture was used to adjust the topological charges and a cylindrical lens was used to generate optical vortices. We employed the diffraction integral method to simulate the processes. In detail, the field distribution of a diffracted obscured HG mode can be expressed as follows:
U in ( x , y ; z ) = e i k z i λ z U 0 ( x , y ) exp i k 2 z ( x x ) 2 + ( y y ) 2 d x d y ,
where the obscured HG mode can be described as the following formula:
U 0 ( x , y ) = E 0 w 0 w ( z 0 ) H m 2 x w ( z 0 ) H n 2 y w ( z 0 ) exp x 2 + y 2 w 2 ( z 0 ) i k ( x 2 + y 2 ) 2 R ( z 0 ) × exp i ψ m , n ( z 0 ) e i k z 0 A ( x x c ) ,
In Equation (1), U i n ( x , y ; z ) is the complex amplitude at the front surface of the cylindrical lens; z is the propagation distance; U 0 ( x , y )   is the complex amplitude after aperture modulation; k   is the wavenumber; and λ is the wavelength. In Equation (2), z 0 is the axial distance from the beam waist to the aperture; E 0   is the overall amplitude coefficient; w 0   is the waist radius; w z 0 = w 0 1 + ( z 0 / z R ) 2 is the beam radius at z 0 ;   H m [ 2 x w ( z 0 ) ]   a n d   H n [ 2 y w ( z 0 ) ] are the Hermite polynomials of orders m and n, respectively; z R = π w 0 2 / λ is the Rayleigh length, R z = z [ 1 + ( z R / z ) 2 ] is the radius of curvature of the equal-phase surface, and the Gouy phase is ψ m , n z = m + n + 1   a r c t a n   ( z / z R ) . Specifically, A ( x x c ) is the Heaviside step function for a single-sided aperture, which equals 1 when x > x c and equals 0 when x < x c .
A cylindrical lens was used to convert the obscured HG mode to an optical vortex, in which the power axis of the cylindrical lens is aligned at a 45° angle with respect to the x-axis. After conversion, the field distribution can be expressed as the following equation:
U f ( X , Y ) = e i k f cos θ i λ f exp i k 2 f ( X cos θ + Y sin θ ) 2 × + U i n ( x , y ) exp i 2 π λ f ( x cos θ + y sin θ ) ( X cos θ + Y sin θ ) d x d y .
In Equation (3), U f ( X , Y ) is the complex amplitude at the focal plane of the cylindrical lens, θ = 45 ° , and f is the cylindrical lens focal length. Under the above conditions, an obscured HG mode is converted into an optical vortex through astigmatic transformation. In the process of mode transformation, the HG mode laser passes through a cylindrical lens and records in the far-field plane. The diffraction process satisfies the Fourier transform from spatial frequency domain to spatial domain. Thus, we utilized the Fourier transform method to simulate the diffraction.
We calculated the expectation value of OAM to quantify the topological charge. The expectation value of OAM can be expressed as follows:
L z = U f * ( L ^ z U f ) d x d y | U f | 2 d x d y .
In Equation (4), L z is the expectation value of OAM in the z direction; L ^ z ( = i / ) is the OAM operator, where is the reduced Planck constant; and is the azimuth angle. Consequently, the topological charge l can be obtained as follows:
l = I m U f * ( U f ϕ ) d x d y | U f | 2 d x d y ,
where I m ( ) is the operation for extracting the imaginary part.

3. Results

First, we built a high-order HG mode laser and demonstrated the continuous modulation of the topological charges of optical vortices from l = 2 to l = 1. By tilting the concave mirror M1 to a specific angle, a HG0,2 mode beam was generated. Using a cylindrical lens, an optical vortex with the topological charge l = 2 was obtained. The intensity distribution of the optical vortex of l = 2 can be observed to exhibit a uniform ring shape. By selectively obscuring the top lobe of the HG0,2 mode beam, the beam was modulated into the TEM0,1 mode. With the CL removed, the intensity distribution of the TEM0,1 was recorded after the beam was focused by L5, as shown in Figure 2a. The corresponding converted optical vortex with the topological charge l = 1 is presented in Figure 2b. The intensity distribution of this optical vortex is non-uniform, with weak intensity on the right side. In contrast to the optical vortex with l = 2, the dark central spot of this beam is substantially smaller. To characterize the spatial phases, the built Mach–Zehnder interferometer was used to produce the interference between an optical vortex and a near-plane wave. The interference patterns are shown in Figure 2c. For the optical vortex with l = 2, the interference pattern presents two bifurcations in the center. For the optical vortex with l = 1, the interference pattern exhibits one bifurcation in the center. As such, the interference results demonstrated the tuning of the topological charge from l = 2 to l = 1. We also retrieve the corresponding phase distributions according to the interference patterns, which further clearly reveal the helical phases with l = 2 and l = 1, respectively.
Numerical simulations were conducted to further reveal the mechanism for tuning the topological charges, as shown in Figure 2e–h. For the unobstructed HG0,2 mode, the phase difference between adjacent lobes is π. This means that the phase transits twice by an amount of π across the transverse plane. As such, after conversion using a CL, the phase distribution of the converted optical vortex is characterized by two full 0 to 2π progressions per single azimuthal rotation. In contrast, when the top lobe of the HG0,2 mode is rightly obscured, the obtained TEM0,1 mode undergoes only single 0 to π phase shift along the transverse direction. This results in the phase distribution with only one cycle per revolution. Moreover, the simulated intensity distribution of the optical vortex with l = 2 exhibits a uniform ring structure, whereas that of the optical vortex with l = 1 is non-uniform. Both the intensity distributions and phase distributions are in good agreement with the experimental results. Therefore, these results demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed edge diffraction method for tuning topological charges.
Next, we demonstrated the modulation across an even broader range of topological charges using a higher-order HG beam laser. By tilting the concave mirror M1 to a larger angle, we generated a HG0,5 mode beam. Using the aforementioned edge diffraction method, a continuous transition from HG0,5 to TEM0,4, TEM0,3, TEM0,2, and TEM0,1 was achieved and recorded by a CCD after propagating a certain distance, in which a TEM0,n mode has n lobes, as shown in Figure 3a. The transverse modes were then converted to optical vortices from l = 5, l = 4, l = 3, l = 2, and l = 1, respectively, as shown in Figure 3b. The intensity distribution of the optical vortex with l = 5 appears as a uniform ring, while those of the modulated optical vortices with l = 4, l = 3, l = 2, and l = 1 show non-uniform distributions. The ring diameters of optical vortices gradually decrease with the reduction in their topological charges. The observed effect is attributed to the lower orbital angular momentum (OAM) carried by a lower-order optical vortex. The diminished OAM manifests as a gentler wavefront phase variation, thereby confining the energy closer to the optical axis and resulting in a smaller ring diameter. The interference patterns of the optical vortices are shown in Figure 3c. The numbers of fringe bifurcations correspond to the topological charges of the optical vortex, which indicate that we have successfully generated optical vortices with l = 4, l = 3, l = 2, and l = 1. Thereby, the results confirmed the feasibility of the proposed method to achieve continuous modulation of topological charges over an extended range. Note that the modulated TEM0,ₙ beams tend to recover to regular HG0,n mode with propagation, as shown in Figure 3a. This evolution can be attributed to the self-healing property of the HG mode after edge diffraction [27].
Furthermore, we also compared the optical vortices generated by obstructing a HG beam from different sides. A HG0,5 mode beam was employed, and optical vortices with l = 3 were created by blocking two lobes from the top, bottom, and both sides simultaneously (Figure 4). The results confirm that the topological charge is determined solely by the number of obscured lobes. However, the intensity distribution of the vortex is highly sensitive to the obscuration ways: top and bottom obstructions lead to weak-intensity regions on the right and left, respectively, while dual-side obscuration reduces intensity on both sides. This demonstrates the possibility of independently controlling the topological charge and the intensity distribution of the optical vortex.
Finally, we recorded the optical field distributions of optical vortices under varying degrees of obscuration applied to a HG beam. By gradually obscuring the top lobe of the HG0,5 mode, the evolution of the vortex field was recorded. We observed that when one lobe of a HG beam is partially obstructed, it generates an optical vortex with an unclosed ring, as shown in the middle column of Figure 5b. As the aperture is continuously moved until it completely blocks the entire lobe, the ring evolves from an unclosed to a closed ring profile. We hypothesize this phenomenon of an unclosed ring to be attributed to the generation of a fractional-charge vortex mode [28,29,30]. To verify this conjecture, we collected and analyzed its interference pattern. As shown in the central part of Figure 5c, the interference fringes exhibit distinct dislocations, which satisfy the typical features of fractional vortex beams and confirm our hypothesis. The region of fringe dislocation indicates an area of phase discontinuity, resulting in an unclosed ring. Therefore, the partially blocked state is responsible for both the generation of a fractional vortex and the non-closure of the ring. The right half of Figure 5 presents simulation results, which show good agreement with the experimental observations. The fractional vortex topological charge was calculated to be 4.23.
It is worth noting that, while the distributions of the phase singularities in both the vortices with l = 5 and l = 4 exhibit relative concentration, the phase singularities in the fractional vortex display significant dispersion (Figure 5f). As depicted in Figure 5e, the intensity distribution of the optical vortex with l = 4 is non-uniform yet continuous. However, the intensity distribution of the fractional optical vortex is discontinuous. We simulated the intensity at the notch position in the vortex beam as the function of obstruction position, as depicted in Figure 6. When a part of a lobe in a HG mode is blocked, the obtained optical vortex can be regarded as the coherent superposition between an integer-order vortex beam and the remaining partial lobe. As such, the destructive interference results in the intensity singularity in the ring.

4. Discussion

Through the experiments, we demonstrated a dynamic method to modulate the topological charges of optical vortices by selectively blocking parts of high-order HG beams. Compared to existing methods such as SPP or cavity structure adjustment, this approach demonstrates superior flexibility and cost efficiency. Additionally, digital micromirror devices (DMDs) can operate at frequencies of several kHz when performing such tasks, while their cost is significantly lower than that of spatial light modulators (SLMs). By employing a DMD as the aperture in our system, the topological charge can be switched much faster.
In our system, the topological charge can be continuously adjusted between two adjacent integers while continuously obscuring one lobe of a HG mode. Under the current experimental conditions, the minimum step size for each adjustment is about 10 μm, and the size of one lobe is approximately 170 μm. As such, the average adjustment resolution of the topological charge is about 0.06. This capability of continuous modulation of topological charges can be applied to the coding space [31], which can significantly enhance the channel capacity of optical communication. Fractional-order vortices exhibit this missing phenomenon in their light intensity. It is equivalent to the interference between a vortex beam carrying an integer topological charge and the remaining partial lobes after obstruction. The intensity singularity is the result of destructive interference. Figure 6 shows the situation of missing intensity in fractional-order vortices. On top of that, the experiment in this study was performed based on a 1064 nm Nd: YVO4 laser. It is worth emphasizing that the proposed method is universal and can be extended to other common laser systems, such as a Ti: Al2O3 laser and erbium-doped fiber laser. The mode transformation between a HG and a LG mode can also be achieved using a tilted lens [32] or an elliptically squeezed axicon [33].
The proposed method exhibits the limitation of energy loss, although the method is simple. In order to quantify the energy loss of this method, we calculated the loss rates under various blocking depths of a fixed HG05 mode. The energy loss is 29.44% when one lobe is blocked, 40.73% when two lobes are blocked, 50.00% when three lobes are blocked, 59.27% when four lobes are blocked, and 70.56% when five lobes are blocked. In addition, the generated vortex beams deviate from standard LG modes. This deviation arises because the obstruction of a HG mode disrupts its original spatial symmetry, which consequently breaks the spatial symmetry of the vortex beam generated through the mode conversion. Such vortex modes are difficult to apply in optical fiber communications. Nevertheless, they still hold practical potential in specific application scenarios such as optical encryption and free-space optical communications, where the encoding dimension is the topological charge itself rather than the precise intensity distribution. In addition, vortex beams with asymmetric intensity distributions also have potential applications in optical tweezers [34], where the rotating motion of a microparticle can be precisely manipulated in a local area.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrates that introducing controllable spatial obscuration into the propagation path of a high-order HG beam enables continuous and dynamic modulation of the topological charges of optical vortices. Experimental results show that localized obscuration in the HG beam induces reconstruction of the diffraction field during propagation, thereby generating an optical vortex with the desired topological charge at the output. In addition, the intensity distribution under a fixed topological charge can also be manipulated by governing the obscuration position of the HG mode. Furthermore, by adjusting the obscuration area ratio of a single lobe, we also demonstrated the generation of a fractional optical vortex. Compared with traditional methods, the edge-diffraction-based modulation mechanism does not require complex optical alignment or phase elements, thereby reducing system complexity, enhancing modulation efficiency, and enabling dynamic control.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Q.; methodology, Z.Q.; software, Y.Z. and S.L.; validation, S.L., Y.Z. and Y.L.; formal analysis, S.L., Y.Z., P.Z. and Z.Q.; investigation, S.L., Y.Z., Y.L. and Z.Q.; resources, Z.Q.; data curation, S.L., Y.Z. and Z.Q.; writing—original draft preparation, S.L. and Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, S.L., Y.Z., L.M. and Z.Q.; visualization, S.L., Y.Z., Y.L., L.M. and Z.Q.; supervision, Z.Q.; project administration, Z.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 62305216.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
HGHermit-Gaussian
OAMorbital angular momentum
OCoutput coupler
CLcylindrical lens
LDlaser diode
SLMspatial light modulator
DMDdigital micromirror device
SPPspiral phase plate
CCDcharge-coupled device
TEMtransverse electromagnetic mode

References

  1. Wang, X.; Nie, Z.; Liang, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, T.; Jia, B. Recent advances on optical vortex generation. Nanophotonics 2018, 7, 1533–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Beijersbergen, M.W.; Coerwinkel, R.P.C.; Kristensen, M.; Woerdman, J.P. Helical-wavefront laser beams produced with a spiral phaseplate. Opt. Commun. 1994, 112, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Qiao, Z.; Kong, L.; Xie, G.; Qin, Z.; Yuan, P.; Qian, L.; Xu, X.; Xu, J.; Fan, D. Ultraclean femtosecond vortices from a tunable high-order transverse-mode femtosecond laser. Opt. Lett. 2017, 42, 2547–2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Willner, A.E.; Pang, K.; Song, H.; Zou, K.; Zhou, H. Orbital angular momentum of light for communications. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2021, 8, 041312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, J.; Yang, J.-Y.; Fazal, I.M.; Ahmed, N.; Yan, Y.; Huang, H.; Ren, Y.; Yue, Y.; Dolinar, S.; Tur, M.; et al. Terabit free-space data transmission employing orbital angular momentum multiplexing. Nat. Photonics 2012, 6, 488–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Grier, D.G. A revolution in optical manipulation. Nature 2003, 424, 810–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Simpson, N.B.; Dholakia, K.; Allen, L.; Padgett, M.J. Mechanical equivalence of spin and orbital angular momentum of light: An optical spanner. Opt. Lett. 1997, 22, 52–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. MacDonald, M.P.; Volke-Sepulveda, K.; Paterson, L.; Arlt, J.; Sibbett, W.; Dholakia, K. Revolving interference patterns for the rotation of optically trapped particles. Opt. Commun. 2002, 201, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kovalev, A.A.; Kotlyar, V.V.; Porfirev, A.P. Optical trapping and moving of microparticles by using asymmetrical Laguerre–Gaussian beams. Opt. Lett. 2016, 41, 2426–2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jack, B.; Leach, J.; Romero, J.; Franke-Arnold, S.; Ritsch-Marte, M.; Barnett, S.M.; Padgett, M.J. Holographic Ghost Imaging and the Violation of a Bell Inequality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 083602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fürhapter, S.; Jesacher, A.; Bernet, S.; Ritsch-Marte, M. Spiral phase contrast imaging in microscopy. Opt. Express 2005, 13, 689–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, L.; Li, F. Beating the Rayleigh limit: Orbital-angular-momentum-based super-resolution diffraction tomography. Phys. Rev. E 2013, 88, 033205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhu, J.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Y.-S.; Li, C.-F.; Guo, G.-C. Synthesis and observation of optical skyrmionic structure in free space. Phys. Rev. A 2024, 110, 043522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Emile, O.; Emile, J. Naked eye picometer resolution in a Michelson interferometer using conjugated twisted beams. Opt. Lett. 2017, 42, 354–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Liang, H.C.; Huang, Y.J.; Lin, Y.C.; Lu, T.H.; Chen, Y.F.; Huang, K.F. Picosecond optical vortex converted from multigigahertz self-mode-locked high-order Hermite-Gaussian Nd:GdVO4 lasers. Opt. Lett. 2009, 34, 3842–3844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Soskin, M.S.; Gorshkov, V.N.; Vasnetsov, M.V.; Malos, J.T.; Heckenberg, N.R. Topological charge and angular momentum of light beams carrying optical vortices. Phys. Rev. A 1997, 56, 4064–4075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mao, L.; Yang, Z.; Zhou, L.; Liu, J.; Su, R.; Zheng, L.; Qiao, Z.; Zhuang, S.; Zhang, D. Manipulating Elliptical Photonic Orbits in Microlasers for High-Dimensional Encryption. Laser Photonics Rev. 2025, 19, 2500238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fang, X.; Ren, H.; Gu, M. Orbital angular momentum holography for high-security encryption. Nat. Photonics 2020, 14, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Arbabi, A.; Horie, Y.; Bagheri, M.; Faraon, A. Dielectric metasurfaces for complete control of phase and polarization with subwavelength spatial resolution and high transmission. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 937–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fisher, A.D. A Review of Spatial Light Modulators. In Proceedings of the Topical Meeting on Optical Computing, Incline Village, NV, USA, 18 March 1985; p. TuC1. [Google Scholar]
  21. Allen, L.; Beijersbergen, M.W.; Spreeuw, R.J.C.; Woerdman, J.P. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes. Phys. Rev. A 1992, 45, 8185–8189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Coullet, P.; Gil, L.; Rocca, F. Optical vortices. Opt. Commun. 1989, 73, 403–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, Y.F.; Huang, T.M.; Kao, C.F.; Wang, C.L.; Wang, S.C. Generation of Hermite-Gaussian modes in fiber-coupled laser-diode end-pumped lasers. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 1997, 33, 1025–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lee, C.Y.; Chang, C.C.; Cho, C.Y.; Tuan, P.H.; Chen, Y.F. Generation of Higher Order Vortex Beams from a YVO4/Nd:YVO4 Self-Raman Laser via Off-Axis Pumping with Mode Converter. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2015, 21, 318–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Qiao, Z.; Xie, G.; Wu, Y.; Yuan, P.; Ma, J.; Qian, L.; Fan, D. Generating High-Charge Optical Vortices Directly from Laser Up to 288th Order. Laser Photonics Rev. 2018, 12, 1800019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pezzé, L.; Smerzi, A. Phase sensitivity of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. Phys. Rev. A 2006, 73, 011801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhao, S.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, Y.; Wang, X.; Jie, Y.; Zhao, C. Self-healing and transformation characteristics of obstructed Hermite-Gaussian modes composed structured beams. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2112.03524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, H.; Zeng, J.; Lu, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, C.; Cai, Y. Review on fractional vortex beam. Nanophotonics 2022, 11, 241–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Berry, M.V. Optical vortices evolving from helicoidal integer and fractional phase steps. J. Opt. A Pure Appl. Opt. 2004, 6, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alexeyev, C.N.; Egorov, Y.A.; Volyar, A.V. Mutual transformations of fractional-order and integer-order optical vortices. Phys. Rev. A 2017, 96, 063807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Z.; Yan, S.; Liu, H.; Chen, X. Superhigh-Resolution Recognition of Optical Vortex Modes Assisted by a Deep-Learning Method. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123, 183902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Vaity, P.; Banerji, J.; Singh, R.P. Measuring the topological charge of an optical vortex by using a tilted convex lens. Phys. Lett. A 2013, 377, 1154–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dwivedi, R.; Sharma, P.; Jaiswal, V.K.; Mehrotra, R. Elliptically squeezed axicon phase for detecting topological charge of vortex beam. Opt. Commun. 2021, 485, 126710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tao, S.H.; Yuan, X.C.; Lin, J.; Peng, X.; Niu, H.B. Fractional optical vortex beam induced rotation of particles. Opt. Express 2005, 13, 7726–7731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic of the optical experimental setup. LD is an 808 nm fiber-coupled laser diode, the transmittance of OC is 2%, CL is a cylindrical lens with a focal length of 50 mm, and CCD is a camera used to record laser patterns. Blue solid frame denotes the reference path in the Mach–Zehnder interferometer. (a) Schematic illustration of off-axis pumping configuration. (b) HG0,5 beam generated from the laser. (c) TEM0,4 and TEM0,3 beams modulated from the HG0,5 mode. (d) Intensity and phase distributions of the converted optical vortices with l = 4 and l = 3 from the modulated TEM0,4 and TEM0,3 beams, respectively.
Figure 1. Schematic of the optical experimental setup. LD is an 808 nm fiber-coupled laser diode, the transmittance of OC is 2%, CL is a cylindrical lens with a focal length of 50 mm, and CCD is a camera used to record laser patterns. Blue solid frame denotes the reference path in the Mach–Zehnder interferometer. (a) Schematic illustration of off-axis pumping configuration. (b) HG0,5 beam generated from the laser. (c) TEM0,4 and TEM0,3 beams modulated from the HG0,5 mode. (d) Intensity and phase distributions of the converted optical vortices with l = 4 and l = 3 from the modulated TEM0,4 and TEM0,3 beams, respectively.
Photonics 12 01076 g001
Figure 2. Topological charge modulation of optical vortices via edge diffraction of a HG0,2 mode laser. (a) Laser patterns of HG0,2 mode and the modulated TEM0,1 mode by obscuring the top lobe of the HG0,2 mode. Inserts show the relative positions of the aperture with respect to the HG0,2 mode. (b) Laser patterns of the optical vortices converted from (a). (c) Interference patterns of the optical vortices in (b), with the white circles indicating the positions of fringe bifurcations. (d) Retrieved phase distributions of the optical vortices with l = 2 and l = 1, respectively. (e,g) Simulated intensity distributions of HG0,2 and modulated TEM0,1 beams, (e) and the corresponding converted optical vortices (g). (f,h) Simulated phase distributions of the HG0,2 and TEM0,1 beams. (f), and the corresponding converted optical vortices (h).
Figure 2. Topological charge modulation of optical vortices via edge diffraction of a HG0,2 mode laser. (a) Laser patterns of HG0,2 mode and the modulated TEM0,1 mode by obscuring the top lobe of the HG0,2 mode. Inserts show the relative positions of the aperture with respect to the HG0,2 mode. (b) Laser patterns of the optical vortices converted from (a). (c) Interference patterns of the optical vortices in (b), with the white circles indicating the positions of fringe bifurcations. (d) Retrieved phase distributions of the optical vortices with l = 2 and l = 1, respectively. (e,g) Simulated intensity distributions of HG0,2 and modulated TEM0,1 beams, (e) and the corresponding converted optical vortices (g). (f,h) Simulated phase distributions of the HG0,2 and TEM0,1 beams. (f), and the corresponding converted optical vortices (h).
Photonics 12 01076 g002
Figure 3. Topological charge modulation of optical vortices via edge diffraction of a HG0,5 mode laser. (a) Laser patterns of HG0,5 modulated TEM0,4, TEM0,3, TEM0,2, and TEM0,1 modes. Inserts show the positions of the relative aperture with respective to the HG0,5 mode. (b) Laser patterns of the converted optical vortices from l = 5 to l = 1. (c) Interference patterns of the converted optical vortices from l = 5 to l = 1. The white circles indicate the locations of fringe bifurcations.
Figure 3. Topological charge modulation of optical vortices via edge diffraction of a HG0,5 mode laser. (a) Laser patterns of HG0,5 modulated TEM0,4, TEM0,3, TEM0,2, and TEM0,1 modes. Inserts show the positions of the relative aperture with respective to the HG0,5 mode. (b) Laser patterns of the converted optical vortices from l = 5 to l = 1. (c) Interference patterns of the converted optical vortices from l = 5 to l = 1. The white circles indicate the locations of fringe bifurcations.
Photonics 12 01076 g003
Figure 4. Experimental results of obscuring two lobes from the top, two lobes from the bottom, and one lobe from each side simultaneously in a HG0,5 mode beam. Dotted frames on the HG0,5 mode denote the blocking regions. The white circles indicate the locations of fringe bifurcations. (a) Blocking of upper two lobes: modulated TEM0,3 mode, optical vortex, and interference patterns. (b) Blocking of lower two lobes: modulated TEM0,3 mode, optical vortex, and interference patterns. (c) Blocking of dual-side two lobes: modulated TEM0,3 mode, optical vortex, and interference patterns.
Figure 4. Experimental results of obscuring two lobes from the top, two lobes from the bottom, and one lobe from each side simultaneously in a HG0,5 mode beam. Dotted frames on the HG0,5 mode denote the blocking regions. The white circles indicate the locations of fringe bifurcations. (a) Blocking of upper two lobes: modulated TEM0,3 mode, optical vortex, and interference patterns. (b) Blocking of lower two lobes: modulated TEM0,3 mode, optical vortex, and interference patterns. (c) Blocking of dual-side two lobes: modulated TEM0,3 mode, optical vortex, and interference patterns.
Photonics 12 01076 g004
Figure 5. Experimental and simulation study of an optical vortice generation by partially obscuring a single lobe of a HG beam. (a) Evolution patterns from HG0,5 to TEM0,4. The obscuration scheme is shown in the top-left corner. (b) Evolution patterns of the corresponding converted optical vortices. White frames indicate the closure characteristics of the intensity distributions. (c) Evolution of interference patterns. Circles annotate the positions of fringe bifurcations. Inset shows dislocation details of the fringes. (df) Simulated evolution of the HG beam, corresponding optical vortices, and the phase distributions from l = 5 to l = 4. White frames highlight the ring closure of the optical vortex. Inset in (f) displays the enlarged phase distribution.
Figure 5. Experimental and simulation study of an optical vortice generation by partially obscuring a single lobe of a HG beam. (a) Evolution patterns from HG0,5 to TEM0,4. The obscuration scheme is shown in the top-left corner. (b) Evolution patterns of the corresponding converted optical vortices. White frames indicate the closure characteristics of the intensity distributions. (c) Evolution of interference patterns. Circles annotate the positions of fringe bifurcations. Inset shows dislocation details of the fringes. (df) Simulated evolution of the HG beam, corresponding optical vortices, and the phase distributions from l = 5 to l = 4. White frames highlight the ring closure of the optical vortex. Inset in (f) displays the enlarged phase distribution.
Photonics 12 01076 g005
Figure 6. Intensity at the notch position in the vortex beam as the function of obstruction position. The gray squares indicate the locations of the intensity sampling points.
Figure 6. Intensity at the notch position in the vortex beam as the function of obstruction position. The gray squares indicate the locations of the intensity sampling points.
Photonics 12 01076 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, S.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Mao, L.; Zhao, P.; Qiao, Z. Tunable-Charge Optical Vortices Through Edge Diffraction of a High-Order Hermit-Gaussian Mode Laser. Photonics 2025, 12, 1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12111076

AMA Style

Li S, Zhang Y, Li Y, Mao L, Zhao P, Qiao Z. Tunable-Charge Optical Vortices Through Edge Diffraction of a High-Order Hermit-Gaussian Mode Laser. Photonics. 2025; 12(11):1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12111076

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Shuaichen, Yiyang Zhang, Ying Li, Linge Mao, Pengfan Zhao, and Zhen Qiao. 2025. "Tunable-Charge Optical Vortices Through Edge Diffraction of a High-Order Hermit-Gaussian Mode Laser" Photonics 12, no. 11: 1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12111076

APA Style

Li, S., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Mao, L., Zhao, P., & Qiao, Z. (2025). Tunable-Charge Optical Vortices Through Edge Diffraction of a High-Order Hermit-Gaussian Mode Laser. Photonics, 12(11), 1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12111076

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop