2.1. Description
Figure 1 illustrates the block diagram of the proposed WDM optical access network with dynamic and bidirectional capacity assignment based on the PolMUX principle. According to a conventional passive optical network (PON) topology, the principal blocks of the network architecture are the central office (CO), the optical link, the remote node (RN) and a group of optical network units (ONUs) remotely located.
Figure 1.
Full-duplex reconfigurable PolMUX-based WDM optical access network.
Figure 1.
Full-duplex reconfigurable PolMUX-based WDM optical access network.
The CO contains a set of optical transceivers. A number N of them (from Tr1F to TrNF) is reserved to the fixed capacity channels assignment whereas a number M of them (from Tr1E to TrME) is reserved to the extra capacity channels assignment. The architecture of all transceivers is identical. Each transceiver is composed by a PolMUX transmitter (PolMUX Tx) and a simple receiver (Rx) structure. In the PolMUX Tx, a single optical source provides an optical wavelength λ1F carrier which is split in two signals by a polarization beam splitter (PBS). In such a way, two orthogonally polarized optical fields are generated at the same wavelength. One of them, λF1,down is chosen as the optical downlink carrier and, thus, it is externally modulated by the downstream signal using an electro-optical modulator (EOM). The other carrier, λF1,up is left as a continuous wave (CW) and takes the role of uplink carrier. Both optical carriers are multiplexed into a polarization beam combiner (PBC) and injected into the network. Therefore, in the CO, a number (M+N) transceivers provide a pair of optical PolMUX carriers for the downlink and uplink transmission.
Every pair of PolMUX carriers at the output of its correspondent transceiver are multiplexed by means of a [N+M]In × [1]Out Arrayed Waveguide Grating (AWG-CO) wavelength multiplexer/demultiplexer. Thus, all combined fixed and extra wavelengths are propagated in downlink direction through the optical fiber link.
The RN is based on a very compact and flexible wavelength router based on a cyclic [N+M]
In × [N+M]
Out AWG where N and M are the number of fixed and extra capacity channels respectively [
6]. The network capacity is dynamically reconfigured in both downlink and uplink directions by means of an [M]
In × [N+M-1]
Out optical switch, being M the number of extra capacity channels.
In the downlink direction, the AWG-RN performs a demultiplexing operation feeding each ONU with its correspondent set of PolMUX wavelengths. Symmetrically, in uplink direction, the AWG-RN multiplexes and forwards the uplink wavelengths from each ONU back to the CO. A number of N ports of the AWG-RN are always used to provide the bidirectional routing of the N wavelengths. In this way a fixed unitary capacity assignment is assured for each ONU. In addition, depending on the actual service demand, all ONUs are allowed to increase their total bandwidth by a number of extra channels. In fact, when extra capacity is required, the reconfiguration state of the optical switch can be varied dynamically in order to enable a maximum number of M ports of the AWG-RN and, thus, supply the M extra capacity wavelengths. The extra wavelengths are launched back from the optical switch to the input ports of the AWG-RN and emerge from the output ports assigned to the demanding ONU. Thanks to the PolMUX approach, each pair of downlink and uplink carriers fills the same spectral portion. In turns, the spectral efficiency of the AWG-RN is doubled. Therefore, the spectral characteristics of the RN described above are better exploited than the one of the remote routers proposed in [
5,
6,
7,
8,
9].
In the system depicted in
Figure 1, all ONUs are identically composed by an optical AWG and a set of (M+1) optical transceivers structured in two principal parts: the PolMUX receiver (PolMUX Rx) and the transmitter (Tx). The first ONU transceiver is reserved to the associated fixed capacity wavelength, λ
1F. Here, operations such as the photodetection and demodulation of the downlink carrier, λ
F1,down as well as the modulation and back-propagation of the uplink wavelength, λ
F1,up are realized once the two optical PolMUX carriers have been separated by the PBS. The remaining M transceivers perform the same operations but with the extra capacity wavelengths. The (M+1) channels are multiplexed back through a [1]
In × [M+1]
Out AWG
i located at ONU i. Note that, the maximum number of ONUs deployed in the network agrees exactly with the number of fixed capacity wavelengths supplied by the CO, which is N. Owing to the integration of the PolMUX scheme into the network, all ONUs present an identical architecture where all receiving and transmitting operations are performed with a minimized number of components in a way perfectly compatible with the reconfigurable architecture of the network. We remark also the main advantage brought by the integration of the PolMUX strategy into the network, which is the fact that all ONUs keep source-free, while the CO centralizes and provides all downlink and uplink carriers.
Furthermore, in the proposed network configuration, the tracking and control of polarization is also centralized, as a main difference to the previous proposal in [
6]. The device employed to perform such polarization tracking and control is the automatic polarization controller (PC) which is now inserted into each CO transceiver rather than its correspondent ONU. Experimentally, the functionality of the PC is to set a certain polarization extinction ratio (PER) between the two PolMUX carriers and to keep the maximum degree of orthogonality between them during the propagation. This condition is mandatory for the success of the PolMUX technique and must be verified just when the two PolMUX carriers are finally separated at the ONU.
In [
6] it was demonstrated that when the PER is kept to levels higher than 30 dB, the quality of downstream and upstream demodulated signals is widely acceptable. Based on the last assertion, a logical position of the PC would be the ONU. However, the location of the PC can be moved from the ONU to the CO without modifying the transmission performances of the PolMUX system. It is based on the following consideration. When the PC is located at the CO, it is capable of setting the required PER between the PolMUX carriers combined before the downlink propagation. Besides this operation, the PC can be also used to supervise and, in case of polarization misalignments, rectify the state of polarization (SoP) of the uplink optical carrier received after the round trip. In fact, once the upstream signal is received at the CO, its quality can be always taken as “feedback” information about the degree of orthogonality of the two PolMUX carriers received remotely at the ONU.
This assumption is supported by the fact that the PolMUX scheme generates two optical carriers in orthogonal SoP at the CO. In other words, a good/bad quality of the upstream signal demodulated at the CO means automatically that also the downstream signal has been demodulated correctly/incorrectly at the ONU. Under this condition, each of the two positions of the PC are conceptually equivalent since the orthogonality between the PolMUX carriers can be always monitored and maintained either locally at the ONU or remotely at the CO taking the SoP of the uplink carrier as reference.
However, the location of the PC is very critical from a practical point of view. Indeed, the insertion of a PC increases the complexity and cost of each ONU and constrains the operator to locally perform the monitoring and control of the polarization as well as all the operations required in case of polarization misalignments, which is a significant drawback in optical access networks where multiple ONUs are deployed. In contrast, the installation of all PCs at the CO avoids inventory and management issues at the ONU favoring the practical implementation of the network.
2.2. Wavelengths Plan and Characteristics of the Routing Components
In order to provide an experimental validation, the proposed network architecture in
Figure 1 has been implemented using a number of 4 and 2 fixed and extra capacity wavelengths, respectively. The four fixed wavelengths identified as λ
1F, λ
2F, λ
3F and λ
4F and the two extra wavelengths, λ
2E and λ
2E are all emitted by a ITU 0.8 nm-spacing WDM grid multi-wavelength optical source operating in the third transmission window. The AWGs employed in the CO and in each of the four ONUs are [40]
In × [1]
Out and [1]
In × [40]
Out respectively with a larger number of ports than required for availability reasons. The AWG-RN is a cyclic [18]
In × [18]
Out AWG. All AWGs are thermally controlled for matching and stabilization into the ITU grid. Since in our experimental setup M + N = 6, the AWG-RN widely satisfies the number of input and output ports required, with high capacity to accommodate new more channels. The optical switch is a [8]
In × [8]
Out prism switch providing channel selection between a pair of input and output fibers with ultra-low insertion loss. Finally, the transmission is run over 10 km of SMF.
Figure 2 shows the wavelength plan measured at the AWG-CO output ports for fixed and extra capacity channels. The first four ports of the AWG-RN are assigned to the fixed capacity wavelengths between the CO and ONUs 1 to 4. The last two ports, 17 and 18, are reserved to route the extra wavelengths λ
2E and λ
1E respectively. Note that, the accommodation of the extra wavelengths keeps available the central part of the AWG-RN spectral grid for further addition of new wavelengths. This approach shows the great flexibility and scalability of the network to manage higher number of ONUs and/or higher reconfiguration capacity.
Figure 2.
Wavelength spectrum measured at the output of the AWG-CO.
Figure 2.
Wavelength spectrum measured at the output of the AWG-CO.
The optical input power of the extra capacity channels was set 4 dB higher than the optical input power of the fixed channels in order to pre-compensate the insertion loss of the AWG-RN (≈3.5 dB) and the optical switch (≈0.5 dB). In this way, the optical power of both fixed and extra wavelengths in the receiver are roughly the same, allowing a better comparison between them and a more realistic evaluation of the network performance. The optical losses undergone by all wavelengths at the AWG-CO output are around 7 dB, as shown in
Figure 2, mainly due to the AWG-CO and the polarization components in the CO.
2.3. Definition of the Routing Scenarios
As previously explained, apart from the fixed channel assignment, the router described in
Figure 1 is capable to dynamically provide a number of extra channels. Experimentally, such traffic reconfiguration can be implemented and evaluated through different routing scenarios where extra service demand from one or more ONUs implies that one or more extra channels must be routed to them. Taking into account the wavelength plan of
Figure 2, and, with no loss of generality, we have implemented two different routing scenarios whose schematic representation is given in
Table 1.
In the first scenario the extra wavelengths, λ
1E and λ
2E, are assigned to ONU3, emulating the case of maximum capacity demand from one single ONU. In the second scenario λ
1E is assigned to ONU1 whereas λ
2E is routed to ONU2. The second scenario is a clear example of network resource-sharing between two different ONUs. In both scenarios, a fixed capacity service is always assured by routing all fixed wavelengths to their corresponding ONUs. The optical spectra measured at the input of each ONU are given in
Figure 3 for (a) scenario 1 and (b) scenario 2, respectively.
Table 1.
Experimental routing scenarios.
Table 1.
Experimental routing scenarios.
| Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 |
---|
Fixed λs | Extra λs | Fixed λs | Extra λs |
---|
ONU1 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ONU2 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ONU3 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ONU4 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Figure 3.
Optical spectra measured at the AWG-RN outputs in downlink direction for (a) scenario 1; (b) scenario 2.
Figure 3.
Optical spectra measured at the AWG-RN outputs in downlink direction for (a) scenario 1; (b) scenario 2.
In
Figure 3a the two extra wavelengths are both routed to ONU
3 and they emerge from the AWG-RN with the same optical amplitude level than the fixed wavelengths due to the optical power precompensation explained above. Note that the amplitude level of all the three wavelengths present in this ONU is reduced by an amount of 3.5 dB with respect to the level in
Figure 2, due to the AWG-RN loss. In
Figure 3b the extra wavelength λ1E is received by ONU1 while the extra wavelength λ2E is routed to the adjacent ONU2 according to the second scenario. Again, all fixed and extra wavelengths show equalized optical power and losses due to the AWG-RN.
Independently of the scenario, it can be also observed that each ONU, apart from the corresponding set of wavelengths, receives also a small amount of optical power from other adjacent channels. This power leakage is due to the unavoidable inter-channel crosstalk at the AWG-RN and, depending on the filtering characteristics of the AWG-RN, it may vary from band to band. However, the crosstalk level is kept always higher than 35 dB (see dashed line of
Figure 3) and does not affect significantly the routing operations.