Next Article in Journal
Challenges in Phosphorus Removal from Eutrophic Waters Using Adsorption: A Laboratory Comparison of Commercial and Moringa-Derived Adsorbents
Previous Article in Journal
Ferrochrome Pollution and Its Consequences on Groundwater Ecosystems and Public Health
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Environmental Pollution and Biological Invasions Threaten Native Freshwater Infaunal Bivalves in the Guandu River Basin, Southeast Brazil

by
Nathália Rodrigues
1,2,
Igor C. Miyahira
1,2,
Antonio J. S. Rodrigues
1,2,
Luciano N. Santos
1,3 and
Raquel A. F. Neves
1,2,*
1
Graduation Program of Neotropical Biodiversity (PPGBIO), Center of Biological Sciences and Health (CCBS), Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Av. Pasteur 458 Room 506A, Rio de Janeiro 22290-240, Brazil
2
Research Group of Experimental and Applied Aquatic Ecology, Institute of Biosciences (IBIO), Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Av. Pasteur 458 Lab 410, Rio de Janeiro 22290-240, Brazil
3
Laboratory of Theoretical and Applied Ichthyology, Institute of Biosciences (IBIO), Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Av. Pasteur 458 Lab 410, Rio de Janeiro 22290-240, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Limnol. Rev. 2025, 25(2), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/limnolrev25020024
Submission received: 10 April 2025 / Revised: 7 May 2025 / Accepted: 26 May 2025 / Published: 3 June 2025

Abstract

Freshwater bivalves play essential ecological roles in ecosystems, but they are among the most threatened fauna worldwide. Despite receiving industrial and domestic wastes, the Guandu River is the main source of drinking water for more than nine million people in the Rio de Janeiro metropolitan region. This study aimed to assess how infaunal bivalves respond to water and sediment quality in the Guandu River basin. Samples were collected at 10 sites across reservoirs, lotic, and lentic systems during cold–dry and warm–rainy seasons. Four bivalves were identified: Anodontites trapesialis, Diplodon ellipticus, Corbicula fluminea (non-native), and C. largillierti (non-native). Native species were restricted to two lentic sites at Guandu Lagoon, with the poorest environmental quality, significantly affected by high chlorophyll a and ammonia in the water. In contrast, C. fluminea was widely distributed and more abundant in the basin but restricted to less degraded sites, suggesting a lower tolerance to environmental pollution. Multivariate analyses indicated significant differences in environmental conditions and species–environment correlation. The non-native species spread and poor environmental quality threaten native bivalves in the Guandu River basin, leading them to a local extinction risk. Results highlight the need for effective management and conservation actions to protect biodiversity in tropical river basins.

1. Introduction

Freshwater ecosystems are experiencing a progressive decline in biodiversity [1]. Although freshwater covers less than 1% of the planet’s surface, more than 50% of the human population lives within 3 km of a freshwater body. This human proximity can threaten freshwater species and habitats, including many biodiversity hotspots, through changes in flow, pollution, overexploitation of species, and invasive species. Human activities pose a major threat to the ecological integrity of river ecosystems, as they impact habitats, the quality of water available to the population, and biota [2]. According to the Living Planet Report [3], a significant average decline in the relative abundance of wildlife populations was found, with the greatest losses in the tropical regions of Latin America and the Caribbean, reaching a drop of 94%, with freshwater organisms being the group with the greatest reduction, around 83%. Furthermore, freshwater is a critical resource for living animals and human society.
According to Sustainable Development Goal (SDS) No. 6 proposed by the United Nations [4], it is necessary to provide safe drinking water for more than 800 million people who lack basic services and improve the accessibility and security of services for more than 2 billion people, mainly in Africa and Latin America. In Brazil, the main urban and industrialized areas are located in the states of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, which explains why a considerable percentage of the Brazilian population lives in these two metropolises and needs resources from their rivers, such as for water supply, animal and plant production, and hydropower electricity generation (more than 60% of the country’s electricity output in 2023) [5]. The Guandu River is the main river basin in Rio de Janeiro state, which runs through its entire territory and supplies eight municipalities, being the only source of drinking water for more than nine million people in the metropolitan region [6]. Although it is of essential importance, the Guandu River receives untreated industrial and domestic waste daily [7].
Freshwater mollusks are among the most threatened fauna groups in the world [8,9]. Thus, concern about the conservation of natural resources has been increasingly frequent, mainly due to habitat alteration, the introduction of non-native species, and excessive use of natural resources, causing a reduction in diversity [10]. The Asian clam Corbicula fluminea (Muller, 1774) is among the most widespread non-native species in Brazil and the most widely distributed freshwater species in South America [11], which can cause several direct and indirect impacts on macroinvertebrate assemblages through the reduction in available habitat [12]. In addition, filtration by invasive bivalves can negatively affect the recruitment of some species [13]. Thus, these effects can alter the abundance and diversity of native mollusks in freshwater ecosystems in America and Europe [14,15,16,17]. A study on the survey of mollusks in the Guandu River Basin evidenced this pattern, where C. fluminea was the species found in all sampling stations [18]. The main problems faced by the invasion of these organisms are changes in environmental conditions and competition with native bivalves, which reduce their populations. Furthermore, due to the excessive input of waste that the Guandu River receives daily, the presence of several types of contaminants, such as phosphate [19], metals [20], and persistent organic pollutants [7], has been observed along its course. This may interfere with local diversity and abundance of species, as evidenced in other rivers [21,22]. Molluscan distribution has been associated with physical and chemical environmental variables, such as pH [23], conductivity [24], and chlorophyll a [25]. Moreover, other studies have demonstrated the molluscan assemblage responses to organic pollution [26] and contaminants [27], which reduce assemblage richness and consequently interfere with the availability of nutrients.
Bivalves are important in providing ecosystem services, playing an essential role in the food web [10], and are among the most vulnerable groups of invertebrates in freshwater ecosystems [18]. One of the possible reasons may be the synergistic effect between habitat degradation and the loss of larval vectors to colonize new habitats, limiting the ability of species to persist [19] and invasive species [28]. In Rio de Janeiro state, where five native and two invasive species have been recorded, the protected areas are ineffective in protecting native freshwater bivalves, especially members of the order Unionida [29]. Recently, the golden mussel Limnoperna fortunei (Dunker, 1857) [30] was recorded in the Santa Branca Reservoir, part of the Paraíba do Sul River Basin in São Paulo state. This new invasive species in the Paraíba do Sul River basin highlights an enormous risk of new introductions, with potential risks of severe ecological and economic impacts, since part of its waters are diverted to the Guandu River basin through a network of reservoirs, pipes, water tunnels, and pumping stations [30]. For this reason, it is of fundamental importance to assess the distribution of freshwater bivalves throughout a gradient of environmental conditions so that there is increasingly more predictability regarding species conservation. Understanding the distribution of native bivalves in freshwater ecosystems, especially in systems subjected to different environmental conditions, can provide important insights to improve conservation status. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the composition, abundance, and spatial distribution of infaunal bivalves in the Guandu River basin (Rio de Janeiro state, southeast Brazil) and evaluate their responses to environmental variables in the water and sediment. For that, the samplings included sites within three freshwater systems in this river basin (i.e., lentic, lotic, and reservoirs).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The Guandu River basin has an extension of 108.5 km and an area of 1385 km2, extending from the confluence of the Ribeirão das Lajes River with the Santana River to the mouth of Sepetiba Bay (22.55–23.19° S and 43.29–44.28° W). The river flow is mainly made up of the discharge from Ribeirão das Lajes regulated by the Pereira Passos Hydroelectric Plant in Piraí city (Rio de Janeiro state). In its upper course, the Guandu River borders low-income urban areas, such as Japeri, Engenheiro Pedreira, and Parque Cesária. In Japeri city, there is a garbage dump that accumulates waste from the population living in this area, and after precipitation events, residuals are drained into the Guandu River. The contribution to the flow of the Guandu River after the diversions of the Paraíba do Sul and Ribeirão das Lajes rivers allowed the construction of the Guandu Water Treatment Station (ETA-CEDAE) for human supply, in operation since 1955, which currently treats around 47 m3s−1 of water for the consumption of the population from the Rio de Janeiro metropolitan region. Upstream of the ETA Guandu intake, there is the Guandu Lagoon, where the Poços and Ipiranga Rivers flow. Both are heavily polluted by domestic sewage, industrial effluents, and solid wastes from surrounding low-income communities. In the mountainous portion of the Guandu River Basin, there are extensive areas of depleted soils, dominated by erosion processes, which, when sediments are released back into the watercourse associated with sand mining activities, produce fine sediments, although prohibited, to be released [31]. Considering that several municipalities intensely use the Guandu River basin in the Baixada Fluminense (i.e., part of the Metropolitan Region of Rio de Janeiro, composed of 13 municipalities, where more than 3.5 million inhabitants live) and by an industrial complex in the municipality of Itaguaí, it has been chronically and gradually affected by pollutants from wastes of diverse nature. The industrial complex located at Baixada Fluminense has more than 100 active industries distributed across eight municipalities, with a higher concentration of industries in the municipalities of Rio de Janeiro, Itaguaí, and Queimados. Half of the large companies are from the metallurgical sector, and there are also important industries in the brewery, printing, and rubber sectors [32]. The metallurgical sector is made up of medium- and large-sized companies, generally old, with low efficiency in the use of raw materials, with a high potential for waste production and precarious conditions in terms of treatment, thus presenting low environmental performance [31].

2.2. Samplings

The Environmental Institute of the State of Rio de Janeiro (INEA) established a water quality gradient following the environmental resolution [33], which specifies the classification of water bodies and environmental guidelines for their classification. Ten sampling sites were surveyed in the Guandu River basin following the river course, encompassing four municipalities of Rio de Janeiro state (Nova Iguaçu, Japeri, Paracambi, Piraí) and an environmental gradient that included sampling sites submitted to different degrees of impacts and anthropogenic activities [34] (Figure 1). In addition, the samplings comprehended sites with lentic (n = 3; ST1, ST2, and ST4) and lotic waters (n = 4; ST3, ST5, ST6, and ST7) and reservoirs (n = 3; ST8, ST9, and ST10) during two seasonal periods: cold–dry (August 2022) and wet–warm (April 2023).
Bivalve sampling was carried out by active search using a handled metallic scoop in all suitable habitats, including marginal and floating vegetation. The samplings were performed by two researchers for 30 min, totaling 60 min per sampling location, and bivalves were surveyed by hand in sandy and muddy sediments to avoid damage to their shells. The sampling protocol was based on a previous study conducted at the Guandu River Basin [18]. After sampling, bivalves were conditioned in plastic zip bags, identified, kept at ice temperature, and, subsequently, frozen at −20 °C for laboratory procedures. The abundance values represent the sum of specimens collected at each sampling station.
Simultaneously, water variables were assessed using a multiparameter probe (model HI98494, Hanna Instruments, Sat Nusfalau, Romania), and chlorophyll a was measured using a calibrated FluoroSense handheld fluorometer (Turner Designs, San Jose, CA, USA). Thus, seven water variables were assessed during samplings: temperature (°C), conductivity (µS/cm), pH, dissolved oxygen (mg/L and %), total dissolved solids, and chlorophyll a (µg/L). Moreover, water (n = 2) and sediment samples (n = 2) were taken for environmental variable measurements in the laboratory. Surface water (~20 cm) samples were collected using a glass bottle (250 mL), previously cleaned, and kept at ice temperature for nutrient and turbidity analyses within a few hours (1–2 h). Surface sediment (~5 cm) was collected in two replicates manually using a stainless-steel core (80 cm2) at each sampling station. All the samples were immediately packed in plastic zip bags and stored at ice temperature until transport to the laboratory, where samples were frozen at −20 °C for further analysis.

2.3. Laboratory Procedures

Water turbidity was analyzed in triplicate in the samples (n = 2) using a turbidimeter (model TD-300, ±0.5 NTU, Instrutherm, São Paulo, Brazil). Phosphate (PO43−), ammonia (NH3), and nitrite ions (NO2) were analyzed in the water samples (n = 2) from the sampling sites. The method for phosphate analysis is an adaptation of the acid ascorbic method [35] using the Hanna Checker colorimeter for low range (0–2.5 mg/L; HI713) with a resolution of 0.01 mg/L and an accuracy of ±0.04 mg/L. The method for ammonia analysis is an adaptation of the Nessler method [36], using the Hanna Instruments Checker colorimeters (Sat Nusfalau, Romania) for low range (0–3 mg/L; HI700) or high range (0–100 mg/L; HI733). The ammonia colorimetric method for low and high ranges has, respectively, a resolution of 0.01 and 0.1 mg/L and an accuracy of ±0.05 or ±1.0 mg/L. The method for nitrite analysis is an adaptation of the EPA Diazotization method 354.1 using the Hanna Checker colorimeter for low range (0–600 μg/L; HI707) with a resolution of 1 μg/L and accuracy of ±20 μg/L.
The sediments were analyzed on the laser diffraction equipment Malvern Hydro 2000 MU (Lancashire, Great Britain), in which the limits of equipment detection and quantification are 0.01 μm and 0.03 μm, respectively. The equipment employs laser diffraction to analyze particle size distributions. A laser beam is directed through a suspension of particles, and a series of detectors measure the light scattered by these particles. Grain size statistics and parameters were calculated by sampling area using the method of moments [37]. Six grain-size parameters were obtained: mean (Φ), median (Φ), sorting coefficient (Φ), skewness, kurtosis, and kurtosis for a normal distribution. Grain classification was determined based on the literature [38,39]. Sediment samples were homogenized, separated in triplicate, and dried for 48 h at 80 °C. Their moisture content (%) was determined by weight loss after sediment drying, and their organic matter content (mg/g sediment dry weight and %) was determined from the weight loss after ignition at 550 °C for 4 h [40,41]. In addition, carbonates, total organic carbon (TOC), nitrogen (TN), and phosphorus (TP) contents were analyzed in the sediment samples. The carbonate content of sediments was assessed by acid dissolution, with a limit of detection (LD) of 0.1% [42]. TOC and TN contents in the sediment were quantified with an infrared combustion using a CHN Flash 2000 carbon analyzer (Thermo Scientific, Milan, Italy) [43]. The LD for TOC and TN in the sediment was, respectively, 0.05 mg/g (0.005%) and 0.07 mg/g (0.007%), and the limit of quantification (LQ) was 0.15 mg TOC/g (0.015%) and 0.21 mg TN/g (0.021%). TP content was assessed by sediment calcination, followed by acid treatment and photometry analysis in the spectrophotometer Lange DR 5000 (Hach, London, ON, Canada) [44]. The LD for TP was 31 × 10−6 mg/g (31 × 10−7%), and the LQ was 93 × 10−6 mg/g (93 × 10−7%).

2.4. Statistical Analyses

Principal component analyses (PCA) were applied to the environmental data (water (n = 9) and sediment (n = 10)) after Hellinger transformation, in order to evaluate which surface water (temperature, conductivity, pH, turbidity, chlorophyll a, dissolved oxygen, ammonia, nitrite ions, and phosphate) and sediment variables (grain size parameters—mean, median, skewness, kurtosis—and the content of organic matter, carbonates, total organic carbon, total nitrogen, total phosphorus) mostly contributed to explaining the environmental quality and seasonal patterns. The Broken-Stick criterion was used to retain the PCA significant axes for sampling ordination. A randomization test was requested with 9999 runs, and the seed for the random number generator was set to 4507 for all eigenvalues and eigenvectors.
A constrained redundancy analysis (RDA) was applied to assess the relationship between bivalve species abundance and environmental variables of water (n = 9) and sediment (n = 10). A forward model selection routine was used for RDA to select the independent variables with significant contributions (9999 permutations, p ≤ 0.05) for the best model explanation. The environmental data were Hellinger-transformed to standardize the variable’s units and improve the performance of the RDA linear method [45]. Axes significance was tested by permutation (9999). PCA and RDA analyses were performed in the software PC-ORD 6 and CANOCO 5, respectively.

3. Results

The first two PCA axes were selected by the Broken-Stick (BS) method, with axes 1 and 2 significantly (p = 0.0001) explaining, respectively, 51.73% (BS eigenvalue = 2.93) and 26.43% (BS eigenvalue = 1.93) of the total variance (Figure 2). Both axes 1 and 2 PCA of surface water data clearly evidenced the formation of two groups, distinguishing samples from the dry–cold (blue symbols) and from the wet–warm (red symbols) seasons. PCA axis 1 mostly distinguished samples with distinct water quality indicators, in which samples from ST1 and ST2 were located on the left side of the biplot and correlated with high concentrations of chlorophyll a (r = 0.77) and ammonia (NH3; r = 0.76), and lower values of dissolved oxygen (r = 0.68), temperature (r = 0.88), and pH (r = 0.82). Except for the sample from ST2 collected during the warm–rainy season, which was on the right side of the biplot and closely associated with the sample from ST10 collected during the warm–rainy season and correlated with high values of turbidity (r = 0.62). PCA axis 2 mostly evidenced seasonal differences among samples from the other sampling sites (ST3–ST10), in which samples collected during the cold–dry season were located on the upper side of the biplot and correlated with high values of dissolved oxygen (r = 0.60), conductivity (r = 0.63), and pH (r = 0.5). Samples collected during the warm–rainy season were correlated with high values of nitrite ions (r = 0.42) and turbidity (r = 0.71).
The mean values of water quality variables measured at sampling sites in the Guandu River basin during the cold–dry and warm–rainy seasons are presented in Table 1. In general, the values of phosphate, ammonia, and chlorophyll a were higher in ST1 and ST2 than in other sampling sites, while dissolved oxygen showed lower concentrations in those sites. Independent of the sampling site in the river basin, water data showed a tendency to increase turbidity and pH, associated with reductions in nutrients (phosphate, ammonia, and nitrite ions) and chlorophyll a during the warm–rainy season (Table 1).
For the sediment data matrix, the first two PCA axes were selected by the Broken-Stick (BS) method, with axes 1 and 2 significantly (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.001, respectively) explaining, respectively, 45.08% (BS eigenvalue = 2.93) and 23.94% (BS eigenvalue = 1.93) of the total variance (Figure 3). Both axes 1 and 2 of PCA of sediment data clearly evidenced the formation of two groups, distinguishing samples from the dry–cold (blue symbols) and the wet–warm (red symbols) seasons. PCA axis 1 grouped samples from various sampling sites, independent of system characteristics (i.e., lotic, lentic, or reservoirs), with a slight tendency to separate by seasons that were mostly distinguished by grain size (median r = 0.85 and mean r = 0.88), content of carbonates (r = 0.88), total carbon (r = 0.79), total nitrogen (r = 0.82), and total phosphorus (r = 0.88). Samples located on the right side of the biplot (e.g., ST5, ST6, ST7, and ST10) were associated with lower values of those variables, while samples on the left side of the biplot (e.g., ST1 and ST2) were related to higher values. PCA axis 2 was mostly correlated with grain-size parameters—positively for skewness (r = 0.82) and sorting (r = 0.75), and negatively for kurtosis (r = −0.81). There was no tendency for group formation by sampling site location, independent of the seasonal period or characteristic of freshwater systems (i.e., lotic, lentic, or reservoir).
Detailed data concerning sediment classification, grain-size parameters, and the content of organic matter, carbonates, and nutrients (organic carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus) are shown in Table 2.
Four species of infaunal bivalves were found in the Guandu River basin, including two native species—Anodontites trapesialis (Lamarck, 1819) and Diplodon ellipticus (Wagner, 1817)—and two non-native species—Corbicula fluminea and Corbicula largillierti (Philippi, 1844), belonging to the families Mycetopodidae, Hyriidae, and Cyrenidae, respectively. An assembly of 2900 bivalves was collected during this study, among which 1182 bivalves were sampled in the dry period and 1718 individuals in the warm–wet season. The non-native C. fluminea was the most abundant species, totaling 2553 individuals (88%), followed by the other non-native species C. largillierti (9%) and the native species D. ellipticus (2%) and A. trapesialis (0.6%). The distribution of native species was restricted to the sampling sites at the Guandu lagoon (i.e., ST1, ST2, and ST4), despite the presence of the non-native species at ST4 and ST1 (only in the wet–warm season) (Figure 4). For all the other sampling sites, only non-native species of Corbicula were found during the two seasonal periods.
A constrained redundancy analysis (RDA) was applied to summarize the abundance of bivalve species (i.e., response variable) that can be explained by the environmental conditions of the Guandu River basin (i.e., explanatory variables), following a stepwise forward criterion for the selection of environmental variables. RDA axes 1 and 2 showed a species–environment correlation of 49.06% and, respectively, accounting for a percentage variation of species–environment relation of 57.4% (Eigenvalue RDA 1 = 0.49) and 8.33% (Eigenvalue RDA 2 = 0.08) (Figure 5). All the canonical axes of this RDA were statistically significant (Permutation test, Axis 1: pseudo-F = 15.4 and p = 0.004; and Axis 2: pseudo-F = 10.8 and p = 0.002). RDA evidenced spatial segregation of native species occurrence (A. trapesialis and D. ellipticus) in the lentic areas (ST1 and ST2), where high concentrations of chlorophyll a (forward selection, percentage of explanation = 42.6%, p = 0.002) and ammonia (forward selection, percentage of explanation = 15.8%, p = 0.016) in the surface water are the main environmental drivers distinguishing these sampling sites in the Guandu River basin. The non-native species (C. fluminea and C. largillierti) were associated with all the other sampling sites with better environmental quality, independent of freshwater systems (i.e., lentic, lotic, or reservoirs).

4. Discussion

The results of the present study evidenced the struggling conditions faced by native infaunal bivalves in the Guandu River basin, where solely two native species (A. trapesialis and D. ellipticus) that still occur in this basin are threatened by the spread of non-native Corbicula species and the severe pressure of pollutants that degrade the environmental quality of infaunal bivalve habitats. It is important to highlight that the sampling sites still not invaded by the non-native species (ST1 and ST2) comprise a lentic area in the Guandu River basin known as Guandu Lagoon, although these species were recorded at these sites by [18]. This lentic area suffers from the input of chemical contaminants and organic wastes from its tributaries (e.g., Ipiranga River, Cabuçu River, Queimados River), mostly untreated domestic sewage, leading to high levels of dissolved total phosphorus, cyanobacteria, enteric bacteria and cyanobacteria blooms [46,47,48]. Fecal contamination by human and animal sources (e.g., bovine, swine, and equine markers) was detected by host-specific genetic markers in the waters of the Guandu River, and it was associated with Escherichia coli presence, but in compliance with Brazilian guidelines (<1000 MPN/100 mL) [48]. This severe environmental quality in the Guandu Lagoon (ST1 and ST2) was evidenced by multivariate analyses in the present study, in which high concentrations of chlorophyll a and ammonia explained most of the species–environmental relationship for bivalve species. These results suggest a high tolerance of the native bivalves A. trapesialis and D. ellipticus to the poor environmental quality caused by high pollution levels, mostly evidenced by the organic pollution indicators. Simultaneously, it is also expected that a lower tolerance of the non-native Corbicula species will be found in the worst water quality habitats. The species C. fluminea has demonstrated a significant response to ammonia contamination, in which mortality was detected when experimental concentrations of ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) in the water increased [49]. Besides organic pollutants, chemical contaminants have already been detected in Guandu Lagoon. Recently, the broad-spectrum insecticide Fipronil—a phenylpyrazole used in industrial, residential, and agricultural sectors—was detected and quantified in the Guandu Lagoon (2.41 µg/L) and two other downstream lotic areas of Guandu River (0.343 and 1.79 µg/L) [50]. Surface waters sampled at two sampling sites (very close to ST1 and ST2) in the Guandu Lagoon induced cytotoxic and genotoxic effects in the Allium cepa system [44]. However, the intensity of cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of polluted waters varied between cold–dry and warm–wet seasons, suggesting the effects of tributary river discharges and an increase in contaminated effluents [51].
The native D. ellipticus and the non-native C. fluminea occurred in sympatry only at the sampling site ST4—a lentic area known as Patos Lagoon and characterized as a system with a transitional environmental quality considering its geographical proximity to Guandu Lagoon but, at the same time, favored by the entrance of water flow from the main Guandu River. This better water quality was indicated by the physical and chemical water variables, such as the dissolved oxygen concentration higher than 5 mg/L and intermediate to low nutrient concentrations. For all the other sampling sites in the Guandu River basin, native species occurred in the Guandu Lagoon (ST1 and ST2), or only the non-native species were found together, or only one non-native species (ST3). However, it is not under discussion the dominance of C. fluminea in the abundance of bivalves and its widespread distribution along the Guandu River basin, occupying all the freshwater systems evaluated herein—lentic, lotic, and reservoirs. Possibly, this high number of non-native Asian clams is affecting the water variables, especially turbidity, chlorophyll a, and nutrients, as well as benthopelagic dynamics affecting organic matter and nutrients in water and sediment in the Guandu River basin. Individuals of C. fluminea have the greatest potential among freshwater bivalves to affect sediment and water exchanges due to their filtering activities [52]. Like other invasive bivalves [53], Corbicula spp. can affect the water quality of invaded systems, increasing water transparency and altering nutrient metabolism [54,55,56]. Corbicula fluminea feeds by filtering organic matter in the water column and cycling organic matter in the sediments of the stream bed, which sustains its rapid growth rate [52]. The widespread distribution of C. fluminea in invaded systems resulted in negative ecological and socioeconomic impacts [57]. A great difference between the native and non-native species in the Guandu River basin is undoubtedly related to the life cycle and reproduction. While Corbicula spp. reach ~35 mm and have a short life span of 2–5 years [57]. In addition, C. fluminea has various reproductive strategies, including sexual dioecious lineages or androgenetic cross- and self-fertilizing hermaphrodites conferring a high fecundity for individuals, which is estimated to range from 25,000 to 75,000 veligers during its lifetime [58].
In contrast, the native A. trapesialis and D. ellipticus are larger individuals (reaching 200 mm) that can live for several years. There is little information about the lifetime of South American mussels, but there are records of species that can live 100 years [59]. They also have complex life cycles that include a parasitic larval stage in fishes. In addition, D. ellipticus and A. trapesialis can filter and remove suspended solids, microalgae, and pathogenic bacteria. However, under stressful conditions, such as poor environmental quality, changes in filtration rates may occur, affecting energy balance, growth, and reproduction [60,61]. Therefore, its rapid growth, earlier sexual maturity, short life span, and high fecundity make Corbicula spp. better competitors in invaded systems, facilitating its widespread colonization of new freshwater environments [57,62]. Moreover, C. fluminea can impair the survival of the parasitic larvae (glochidia) of Unionida freshwater bivalves by filtration and biodeposition, negatively impacting and directly affecting the recruitment of juveniles of the native species [63]. Therefore, invasive species may have pushed out the native species to low-quality environments, making the occurrence of native species in other sites difficult. Complementary, ref. [18] advocated for a natural occurrence of large native mussels at the downstream stretches of the Guandu River. The classical theory of the River Continuum Concept [64] points to the occurrence of large mussels at these portions of the rivers due to naturally high levels of nutrients and chlorophyll a.
The multivariate redundancy analysis evidenced a species–environment relationship explained by indicators of water quality (i.e., chlorophyll a and ammonia concentrations) despite evaluating benthic infauna species. This may be explained by lower differences in sediment characteristics among sampling sites and a slight tendency to separate by seasons, even samples from the same site, mostly affected by grain size and content of carbonates, total carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus. These results suggest a great instability of the benthic compartment between seasonal periods, probably affected by increased input of sediments from adjacent terrestrial sources or tributaries during the rainy season. While the water variables better distinguished the sampling sites along the river basin, especially those located in the Guandu Lagoon (ST1 and ST2), which showed the worst water quality indicators (higher chlorophyll a and ammonia concentrations and lower dissolved oxygen and pH), they also evidenced differences between the seasonal periods. In tropical regions, the warm–rainy season is characterized by higher accumulated precipitation, increasing the input of rainfall and discharge of tributary rivers that also carry contaminants, such as the pesticide glyphosate detected in reservoirs of the Guandu River basin [65]. Independent of the sampling site in the river basin, there was a tendency to increase turbidity and pH in the warm–rainy season, probably related to organic matter and sediment influx from tributaries, associated with lower concentrations of nutrients and chlorophyll a—probably more diluted considering an increase in river flow. Rainfall seasonality can lead to changes in the physical and chemical water variables, such as turbidity, particularly in areas without vegetation and unprotected regions, due to the transport and resuspension of sediments [66]. Water pH may also change due to differences in the concentration and types of organic matter or pollutants present during different seasonal periods [67]. Thus, even for benthic species, the water variables were more effective in indicating differences in the environmental quality of various freshwater systems (i.e., lentic, lotic, and reservoirs) in the Guandu River basin.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the spatial distribution of native bivalves is limited to Guandu Lagoon, the area with the worst water quality in the Guandu River basin, and the low abundances found for these species reinforce a local extinction risk of these native species, especially A. trapesialis, which only occurred in this lentic area (ST1 and ST2). In the Guandu Lagoon, the pollution scenario is a major struggle for the native species since the poor environmental conditions can impact their physiological status and reproduction. Several attempts have been made to improve the water quality of the Guandu River, which provides drinking water for more than nine million people in the metropolitan region of Rio de Janeiro [6], such as the use of bentonite clay, oxygen peroxide, phytoremediation, hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria, and magnetic phosphorus removal [68,69,70]. However, besides some treatment compounds that can have undesirable consequences for human health, none of the treatments seemed to be completely effective in water quality management since they are palliative methods. However, improvements in water quality and environmental conditions in the Guandu Lagoon may also favor the spread of non-native Corbicula to this area, where the genus seems to be tolerance limited. The occurrence of C. largillierti at ST3—a lotic sampling site with high saturation of dissolved oxygen in the main Guandu River, geographically close to the Guandu Lagoon—highlights the concern of the potential spread of Corbicula spp. along the river basin. Thus, an additive effect of pollution and invasive species can enhance the risks of local extinctions of Anodontites and Diplodon species in the Guandu River basin. Unfortunately, native freshwater bivalves are not at risk only in the Guandu River basin; native freshwater bivalves are mostly distributed in areas that offer low levels of protection and frequent sympatry with non-native species in the Rio de Janeiro state, which includes the Paraíba do Sul River [28]. Moreover, the recent introduction of the golden mussel L. fortunei in the Paraíba do Sul River, associated with the predictions of an inevitable introduction in the Guandu River [30], represents an additional factor that endangers these native infaunal bivalves in freshwater ecosystems of the Rio de Janeiro state.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.N.S. and R.A.F.N.; methodology, I.C.M., L.N.S. and R.A.F.N.; validation, L.N.S. and R.A.F.N.; formal analysis, L.N.S.; investigation, N.R., A.J.S.R., I.C.M., L.N.S. and R.A.F.N.; resources, L.N.S. and R.A.F.N.; data curation, N.R. and R.A.F.N.; writing—original draft preparation, N.R. and R.A.F.N.; writing—review and editing, N.R., A.J.S.R., I.C.M., L.N.S. and R.A.F.N.; visualization, N.R., A.J.S.R., I.C.M., L.N.S. and R.A.F.N.; supervision, R.A.F.N.; project administration, R.A.F.N. and L.N.S.; funding acquisition, I.C.M., L.N.S. and R.A.F.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is part of the EcoShift Guandu project financed by the Foundation Carlos Chagas Filho Research Support of the State of Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) through the Temáticos Program (E-26/211.394/2021) and CNPq-MAI/DAI 2020 (403655/2020-0). In addition, this study was supported by FAPERJ through research grants to RAF Neves (E-26/210.024/2024; E-26/204.410/2024), IC Miyahira (E-26/201.347/2021, E-26/204.446/2024), and LN Santos (E-26/200.489/2023). This research was also financed by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) through the Universal grants attributed to RAF Neves (404346/2021-9) and LN Santos (408310/2023-5), as well as the research grants attributed to RAF Neves (PQ2; 306212/2022-6) and LN Santos (PQ2; 315020/2021-0). Furthermore, this study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001 and CNPq through PhD scholarships to N Rodrigues and AJS Rodrigues.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the present study will be made available upon request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Batata and Ademário for their assistance in the field study and to the university’s drivers for transporting researchers to the sampling sites in Rio de Janeiro state.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
STsampling station

References

  1. Dudgeon, D. Prospects for sustaining freshwater biodiversity in the 21st century: Linking ecosystem structure and function. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2010, 2, 422–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zawal, A.; Lewin, I.; Stępień, E.; Szlauer-Łukaszewska, A.; Buczyńska, E.; Buczyński, P.; Stryjecki, R. The influence of the landscape structure within buffer zones, catchment land use and instream environmental variables on mollusc communities in a medium-sized lowland river. Ecol. Res. 2016, 31, 853–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Leung, B.; Hargreaves, A.L.; Greenberg, D.A.; McGill, B.; Dornelas, M.; Freeman, R. Reply to: Emphasizing declining populations in the Living Planet Report. Nature 2022, 601, E25–E26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Arora, N.K.; Mishra, I. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 2030 and environmental sustainability: Race against time. Environ. Sustain. 2019, 2, 339–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pinto, G.R.S.; Arbache, J.; Antonaccio, L.; Chiavari, J. Cutting Down the (Hydropower) Plants: How the Amazon Deforestation Is Jeopardizing Electricity Generation in Brazil. Rio de Janeiro. 2024. Available online: https://bit.ly/DeforestationAndHydropower (accessed on 26 March 2025).
  6. Tubbs Filho, D.; Antunes, J.C.O.; Silva Vettorazzi, J. Bacia Hidrográfica dos Rios Guandu, da Guarda e Guandu-Mirim: Experiências Para a Gestão dos Recursos Hídricos; Instituto Estadual do Meio Ambiente (INEA): Janeiro, Brazil, 2012; p. 339. Available online: https://www.comiteguandu.org.br/conteudo/livroguandu2013.pdf (accessed on 26 March 2025).
  7. Brito, E.M.S.; Vieira, E.D.R.; Torres, J.P.M.; Malm, O. Persistent organic pollutants in two reservoirs along the Paraíba do Sul-Guandu River system, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Quim. Nova 2005, 28, 941–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lydeard, C.; Cowie, R.H.; Ponder, W.F.; Bogan, A.E.; Bouchet, P.; Clark, S.A.; Thompson, F.G. The global decline of nonmarine mollusks. BioScience 2004, 54, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Strong, E.E.; Gargominy, O.; Ponder, W.F.; Bouchet, P. Global diversity of gastropods (Gastropoda; Mollusca) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 2008, 595, 149–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Santos, E.B.D. Variação Espaço-Temporal da Qualidade da Água na Bacia do Rio Guandu: Uma Abordagem Visando a Gestão de Recursos Hídricos. Bachelor’s Thesis, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2023; p. 33. Available online: https://rima.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/20.500.14407/8758 (accessed on 26 March 2025).
  11. Darrigran, G.; Agudo-Padrón, I.; Baez, P.; Belz, C.; Cardoso, F.; Carranza, A.; Collado, G.; Correoso, M.; Cuezzo, M.G.; Fabres, A.; et al. Non-native mollusks throughout South America: Emergent patterns in an understudied continent. Biol. Invasions 2020, 22, 853–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vaughn, C.C.; Hakenkamp, C.C. The functional role of burrowing bivalves in freshwater ecosystems. Freshw. Biol. 2001, 46, 1431–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yeager, M.M.; Cherry, D.S.; Neves, R.J. Feeding and burrowing behaviors of juvenile rainbow mussels, Villosa iris (Bivalvia: Unionidae). J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 1994, 13, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Williams, J.D.; Warren, M.L.; Cummings, K.S., Jr.; Harris, J.L.; Neves, R.J. Conservation status of freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 1993, 18, 6–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Strayer, D.L.; Caraco, N.F.; Cole, J.J.; Findlay, S.; Pace, M.L. Transformation of Freshwater Ecosystems by Bivalves. BioScience 1999, 49, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. McMahon, R.F. Evolutionary and physiological adaptations of aquatic invasive animals: R Selection versus Resistance. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2002, 59, 1235–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sousa, R.; Antunes, C.; Guilhermino, L. Species composition and monthly variation of the Mollusca fauna in the freshwater subtidal area of the River Minho Estuary. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2007, 75, 75–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Miyahira, I.C.; Carneiro, J.B.; Gonçalves, I.C.B.; Lacerda, L.E.M.D.; Oliveira, J.L.D.; Vasconcelos, M.C.D.; Santos, S.B.D. Freshwater mollusks and environmental assessment of Guandu River, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Biota Neotrop. 2017, 17, e20170342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ferreira, A.P. Environmental investigation of psychiatric pharmaceuticals: Guandu River, Rio De Janeiro State, Southeast Brazil. J. Chem. Health Risks 2014, 4, 25–32. [Google Scholar]
  20. Malm, O.; Pfeiffer, W.C.; Fiszman, M.; Azcue, J.M.P. Heavy metal concentrations and availability in the bottom sediments of the Paraiba do Sul-Guandu River system, RJ, Brazil. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 1989, 10, 675–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Terlizzi, A.; Fraschetti, S.; Guidetti, P.; Boero, F. The effects of sewage discharge on shallow hard substrate sessile assemblages. Mar. Pollut. Bul. 2005, 44, 544–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cope, W.G.; Bergeron, C.M.; Archambault, J.M.; Jones, J.W.; Beaty, B.; Lazaro, P.R.; Damian, S.; Callihan, J.S.; Rogers, J.J. Understanding the influence of multiple pollutant stressors on the decline of freshwater mussels in a biodiversity hotspot. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 773, 144757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bespalaya, Y.V.; Aksenova, O.V.; Sokolova, S.E.; Shevchenko, A.R.; Tomilova, A.A.; Zubrii, N.A. Biodiversity and distributions of freshwater mollusks in relation to chemical and physical factors in the thermokarst lakes of the Gydan Peninsula, Russia. Hydrobiologia 2021, 848, 3031–3044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pérez-Quintero, J.C. Distribution patterns of freshwater molluscs along environmental gradients in the southern Guadiana River basin (SW Iberian Peninsula). Hydrobiologia 2011, 678, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Schuler, M.S.; Hintz, W.D.; Jones, D.K.; Mattes, B.M.; Stoler, A.B.; Relyea, R.A. The effects of nutrient enrichment and invasive mollusks in freshwater environments. Ecosphere 2020, 11, e03196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jiang, X.; Li, Z.; Shu, F.; Chen, J. Effects of river-lake disconnection and eutrophication on freshwater mollusc assemblages in floodplain lakes: Loss of congeneric species leads to changes in both assemblage composition and taxonomic relatedness. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 292, 118330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. McMahon, T.A.; Halstead, N.T.; Johnson, S.; Raffel, T.R.; Romansic, J.M.; Crumrine, P.W.; Rohr, J.R. Fungicide-induced declines of freshwater biodiversity modify ecosystem functions and services. Ecol. Lett. 2020, 15, 714–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Miyahira, I.C.; Clavijo, C.; Callil, C.T.; Cuezzo, M.G.; Darrigran, G.; Gomes, S.R.; Lasso, C.A.; Mansur, M.C.D.; Pena, M.S.; Ramírez, R.; et al. The conservation of non-marine molluscs in South America: Where we are and how to move forward. Biodivers. Conserv. 2022, 31, 2543–2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Miyahira, I.C.; Mansur, M.C.D.; Lacerda, L.E.M.; Gonçalves, I.C.B.; Sant’Anna, G.G.; Santos, S.B. Protected areas and native freshwater bivalves are not in the same place in south-east Brazil. Aquat. Conserv. 2023, 33, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Miyahira, I.C.; Neves, R.A.F.; Rocha, R.J.S.; Castelo-Branco, C.W.; Santos, L.N. A new basin, a new river, a new home-the introduction of Limnoperna fortunei (Dunker, 1857) in Paraíba do Sul basin and its potential consequences to the most important basin for water supply in Southeast Brazil. BioInvasions Rec. 2024, 13, 799–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Instituto Estadual do Meio Ambiente. Relatório da Qualidade da Água do Estado do Rio de Janeiro—Rio de Janeiro. 2013. Available online: https://www.inea.rj.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Consolidado-2013-RH-II.pdf (accessed on 26 March 2025).
  32. Serber, J.B. Diagnóstico Ambiental das Atividades do Pólo Industrial de Queimados Como Subsídio ao Termo de Ajustamento de Conduta na Gestão Sustentável da Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Guandu, RJ. Master’s Thesis, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2005. Available online: https://comiteguandu.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/DIAGNOSTICO-AMBIENTAL-DAS-ATIVIDADES-DO-POLO-INDUSTRIAL-DE.pdf (accessed on 26 March 2025).
  33. Resolução CONAMA n° 357/2005, de 17 de Março de 2005. Dispõe Sobre a Classificação dos Corpos de Água e Diretrizes Ambientais Para o Seu Enquadramento, bem Como Estabelece as Condições e Padrões de Lançamento de Efluentes, e dá Outras Providências. Available online: https://conama.mma.gov.br/?option=com_sisconama&task=arquivo.download&id=450 (accessed on 26 March 2025).
  34. Instituto Estadual do Ambiente. Portal Geo INEA: Base de Dados Espaciais. Available online: https://geoportal.inea.rj.gov.br/portal/apps/experiencebuilder/experience/?id=811a0feace564581afae2f9149b8031d (accessed on 26 March 2025).
  35. American Public Health Association (APHA). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed.; American Public Health Association (APHA): Washington, DC, USA, 2001; p. 1325. [Google Scholar]
  36. ASTM. Standard test methods of ammonia nitrogen in water. In Manual of Water and Environmental Technology, D1426; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021; Available online: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/astm/4e86e02a-fa1b-49c4-b263-1f0d37181970/astm-d1426-08#:~:text=SCOPE,any%2C%20associated%20with%20its%20use. (accessed on 15 January 2025).
  37. Bott, E.D.; Riley, E.A.; Kahr, B.; Reid, P.J. Unraveling the dispersed kinetics of dichlorofluorescein in potassium hydrogen phthalate crystals. J. Phys. Chem. A 2010, 114, 7331–7337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wentworth, C.K. A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. J. Geol. 1922, 30, 377–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shepard, F.P. Nomenclature based on sand-silt-clay ratios. J. Sediment. Res. 1954, 24, 151–158. [Google Scholar]
  40. American Public Health Association (APHA). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th ed.; American Public Health Association (APHA): Washington, DC, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  41. Simpson, S.L.; Batley, G.E.; Chariton, A.A.; Stauber, J.L.; King, C.K.; Chapman, J.C.; Hyne, R.V.; Gale, S.A.; Roach, A.C.; Maher, W.A. Handbook for Sediment Quality Assessment; EMCR: Bangor, NSW, Australia, 2005; p. 126. [Google Scholar]
  42. Suguio, K. Introdução a Sedimentologia; Edgard Blucher & Editora da Universidade de São Paulo: São Paulo, Brazil, 1973; p. 317. [Google Scholar]
  43. Wendlandt, W.W.M. Thermal Analysis; John Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1986; p. 460. [Google Scholar]
  44. Protazio, L.T.S.M.C.N.; Tanaka, S.M.C.N.; Cavalcante, P.R.S. Avaliação de procedimentos de extração sequencial de fósforo em sedimento. Analytica 2004, 8, 35–41. [Google Scholar]
  45. Legendre, P.; Gallagher, E.D. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 2001, 129, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bacha, L.; Ventura, R.; Barrios, M.; Seabra, J.; Tschoeke, D.; Garcia, G.; Masi, B.; Macedo, L.; Godoy, J.M.O.; Cosenza, C.; et al. Risk of collapse in water quality in the Guandu River (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). Microb. Ecol. 2022, 84, 314–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Bianco, K.; Albano, R.M.; Oliveira, S.S.A.; Alves Nascimento, A.P.; dos Santos, T.; Clementino, M.M. Possible health impacts due to animal and human fecal pollution in water intended for drinking water supply of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J. Water Supply Res. Technol. 2020, 69, 70–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cooper, N.L.; Bidwell, J.R.; Cherry, D.S. Potential effects of Asian clam (Corbicula fluminea) die-offs on native freshwater mussels (Unionidae) II: Porewater ammonia. J. N. Am. Bethol. Soc. 2005, 24, 381–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pereira, D. Bivalves límnicos na América do Sul: Subsídios Para a Conservação de Espécies Nativas e Para o Controle do Bivalve Invasor Limnoperna fortunei (DUNKER, 1857). PhD. Thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2014. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/206392 (accessed on 26 March 2025).
  50. Ferreira, T.P.; Bauerfeldt, G.F.; Castro, R.N.; Magalhães, V.S.; Alves, M.C.; Scott, F.B.; Cid, Y.P. Determination of fipronil and fipronil-sulfone in surface waters of the Guandu River Basin by high-performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry. Bullet. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2022, 108, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Gomes, J.V.; Teixeira, J.T.D.S.; Lima, V.M.D.; Borba, H.R. Induction of cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of Guandu River waters in the Allium cepa system. Rev. Ambiente Água 2015, 10, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lauritsen, D.D. Filter-feeding in Corbicula fluminea and its effect on seston removal. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 1986, 5, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Neves, R.A.F.; Naveira, C.; Miyahira, I.C.; Portugal, S.G.M.; Krepsky, N.; Santos, L.N. Are invasive species always negative to aquatic ecosystem services? the role of dark false mussel for water quality improvement in a multi-impacted urban coastal lagoon. Water Res. 2020, 184, 116108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Beaver, J.R.; Crisman, T.L.; Brock, R.J. Grazing effects of an exotic bivalve (Corbicula fluminea) on hypereutrophic lake water. Lake Reserv. Manag. 1991, 7, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yamamuro, M.; Koike, I. Nitrogen metabolism of the filter-feeding bivalve Corbicula japonica and its significance in primary production of a brackish lake in Japan. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1993, 38, 997–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nakamura, Y.; Kerciku, F. Effects of filter-feeding bivalves on the distribution of water quality and nutrient cycling in a eutrophic coastal lagoon. J. Mar. Syst. 2000, 26, 209–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hakenkamp, C.C.; Palmer, M.A. Introduced bivalves in freshwater ecosystems: The impact of Corbicula on organic matter dynamics in a sandy stream. Oecologia 1999, 119, 445–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Modesto, V.; Ilarri, M.; Labecka, A.M.; Ferreira-Rodríguez, N.; Coughlan, N.E.; Liu, X.; Sousa, R. What we know and do not know about the invasive Asian clam Corbicula fluminea. Hydrobiologia 2025, 852, 1183–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Philipp, E.E.; Abele, D. Masters of longevity: Lessons from long-lived bivalves—A mini-review. Gerontology 2010, 56, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Albentosa, M.; Sánchez-Hernández, M.; Campillo, J.A.; Moyano, F.J. Relationship between physiological measurements (SFG-scope for growth-) and the functionality of the digestive gland in Mytilus galloprovincialis. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2012, 163, 286–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sokolova, I.M.; Frederich, M.; Bagwe, R.; Lannig, G.; Sukhotin, A.A. Energy homeostasis as an integrative tool for assessing limits of environmental stress tolerance in aquatic invertebrates. Mar. Environ. Res. 2012, 79, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Sousa, R.; Antunes, C.; Guilhermino, L.E.D.P.S. Ecology of the invasive Asian clam Corbicula fluminea (Müller, 1774) in aquatic ecosystems: An overview. Int. J. Limnol. 2008, 44, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Modesto, V.; Castro, P.; Lopes-Lima, M.; Antunes, C.; Ilarri, M.; Sousa, R. Potential impacts of the invasive species Corbicula fluminea on the survival of glochidia. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 673, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Vannote, R.L.; Minshall, G.W.; Cummins, K.; Sedell, J.R.; Cushing, C.E. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1980, 37, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cristofaro, C.D.S.; Castelo-Branco, C.W.; Rocha, M.I.D.A.; Portugal, S.G.M. Assessing glyphosate concentrations in six reservoirs of Paraíba do Sul and Guandu River Basins in southeast Brazil. Rev. Ambiente Água 2021, 16, e2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Marmontel, C.V.F.; Rodrigues, V.A. Parâmetros Indicativos para Qualidade da Água em Nascentes com Diferentes Coberturas de Terra e Conservação da Vegetação Ciliar. Floresta E Ambiente 2015, 22, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Derisio, J.C. Introdução ao Controle de Poluição Ambiental, 2nd ed.; Signus Editora: São Paulo, Brazil, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  68. Barbosa, R.G.; Sleutels, T.; Verstraete, W.; Boon, N. Hydrogen oxidizing bacteria are capable of removing orthophosphate to ultra-low concentrations in a fed batch reactor configuration. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 311, 123494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Castelo-Grande, T.; Augusto, P.A.; Rico, J.; Marcos, J.; Iglesias, R.H.L.; Barbosa, D. Magnetic water treatment in a wastewater treatment plant: Part I—Sorption and magnetic particles. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 281, 111872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rocha, E.G.; Feitosa, P.H.C.; Amorim, C.M.; Barbosa, D.L. Temporal and spatial trends of a floating islands system’s efficiency. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 277, 111367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Geographical location of the ten sampling sites distributed in the Guandu River basin, Rio de Janeiro, southeast Brazil. The samplings were conducted in sites with lentic waters (n = 3—ST1, ST2, and ST4), lotic waters (n = 4—ST3, ST5, ST6, and ST7), and reservoirs (n = 3—ST8, ST9, and ST10).
Figure 1. Geographical location of the ten sampling sites distributed in the Guandu River basin, Rio de Janeiro, southeast Brazil. The samplings were conducted in sites with lentic waters (n = 3—ST1, ST2, and ST4), lotic waters (n = 4—ST3, ST5, ST6, and ST7), and reservoirs (n = 3—ST8, ST9, and ST10).
Limnolrev 25 00024 g001
Figure 2. Biplot diagram of water variables collected during cold–dry (blue symbols) and warm–rainy (red symbols) seasons in the sampling stations (numbers) distributed throughout the Guandu River basin. The water variables analyzed (represented by gray arrows) were dissolved oxygen—DO (mg/L), pH, temperature—°C, conductivity—Cond (μS/cm), phosphate—PO43− (mg/L), ammonia—NH3 (mg/L), chlorophyll a—Chlo (μg/L), nitrite ions—NO2 (mg/L), and turbidity—NTU. Distinct symbols indicate that samples were collected in lentic systems (full circle), lotic systems (full triangle), or reservoirs (full square).
Figure 2. Biplot diagram of water variables collected during cold–dry (blue symbols) and warm–rainy (red symbols) seasons in the sampling stations (numbers) distributed throughout the Guandu River basin. The water variables analyzed (represented by gray arrows) were dissolved oxygen—DO (mg/L), pH, temperature—°C, conductivity—Cond (μS/cm), phosphate—PO43− (mg/L), ammonia—NH3 (mg/L), chlorophyll a—Chlo (μg/L), nitrite ions—NO2 (mg/L), and turbidity—NTU. Distinct symbols indicate that samples were collected in lentic systems (full circle), lotic systems (full triangle), or reservoirs (full square).
Limnolrev 25 00024 g002
Figure 3. Biplot diagram of sediment variables collected during cold–dry (blue symbols) and warm–rainy (red symbols) seasons in the sampling stations (numbers) distributed throughout the Guandu River basin. The sediment variables analyzed (represented by gray arrows) were the grain size parameters (mean grain size—Φmean, median grain size—Φmedian, sorting coefficient—ST (Φ), skewness—SK, and kurtosis—KT), the content of carbonates—C (%), organic matter—OM (mg/g), total organic carbon—TOC (mg/g), total nitrogen—TN (mg/g), and total phosphorus—TP (mg/g). Distinct symbols indicate that samples were collected in lentic systems (full circle), lotic systems (full triangle), or reservoirs (full square).
Figure 3. Biplot diagram of sediment variables collected during cold–dry (blue symbols) and warm–rainy (red symbols) seasons in the sampling stations (numbers) distributed throughout the Guandu River basin. The sediment variables analyzed (represented by gray arrows) were the grain size parameters (mean grain size—Φmean, median grain size—Φmedian, sorting coefficient—ST (Φ), skewness—SK, and kurtosis—KT), the content of carbonates—C (%), organic matter—OM (mg/g), total organic carbon—TOC (mg/g), total nitrogen—TN (mg/g), and total phosphorus—TP (mg/g). Distinct symbols indicate that samples were collected in lentic systems (full circle), lotic systems (full triangle), or reservoirs (full square).
Limnolrev 25 00024 g003
Figure 4. Abundance (No. of individuals) of the species of infaunal bivalves in the sampling sites at the Guandu River basin in the cold–dry and wet–warm seasons. Sampling site codes denote their geographical location as indicated in Figure 1.
Figure 4. Abundance (No. of individuals) of the species of infaunal bivalves in the sampling sites at the Guandu River basin in the cold–dry and wet–warm seasons. Sampling site codes denote their geographical location as indicated in Figure 1.
Limnolrev 25 00024 g004
Figure 5. Biplot of constrained RDA with occurrence of infaunal bivalve species (full blue arrow) and environmental variables (open red arrow). Bivalve species consisted of Anodontites trapesialis, Diplodon ellipticus, Corbicula fluminea, and Corbicula largillierti. A stepwise forward selection criterion has included only two environmental variables in the RDA that contributed significantly to the model explanation: the concentration of chlorophyll a (Chlo—μg/L) and ammonia (NH3, mg/L). Distinct symbols indicate that samples were collected in lentic systems (full circle), lotic systems (full triangle), or reservoirs (full square).
Figure 5. Biplot of constrained RDA with occurrence of infaunal bivalve species (full blue arrow) and environmental variables (open red arrow). Bivalve species consisted of Anodontites trapesialis, Diplodon ellipticus, Corbicula fluminea, and Corbicula largillierti. A stepwise forward selection criterion has included only two environmental variables in the RDA that contributed significantly to the model explanation: the concentration of chlorophyll a (Chlo—μg/L) and ammonia (NH3, mg/L). Distinct symbols indicate that samples were collected in lentic systems (full circle), lotic systems (full triangle), or reservoirs (full square).
Limnolrev 25 00024 g005
Table 1. Water quality in the surface water of sampling sites measured during cold–dry and wet–warm seasons in the Guandu River basin. Measured variables were temperature (°C), conductivity- Cond (µS/cm), dissolved oxygen—DO (mg/L and %), pH, turbidity (NTU), chlorophyll a—Chlo (µg/L), and the nutrients phosphate—PO43− (mg/L), ammonia—NH3 (mg/L), and nitrite ions—NO2 (mg/L). Data are shown as mean values.
Table 1. Water quality in the surface water of sampling sites measured during cold–dry and wet–warm seasons in the Guandu River basin. Measured variables were temperature (°C), conductivity- Cond (µS/cm), dissolved oxygen—DO (mg/L and %), pH, turbidity (NTU), chlorophyll a—Chlo (µg/L), and the nutrients phosphate—PO43− (mg/L), ammonia—NH3 (mg/L), and nitrite ions—NO2 (mg/L). Data are shown as mean values.
VariablesST1ST2ST3ST4ST5ST6ST7ST8ST9ST10
Cold–dry°C22.6623.022.0323.8522.1521.8921.4922.7222.3421.86
Cond (μS/cm)180.0264.089.5088.0089.0090.0089.5089.0086.0097.50
DO (mg/L)3.671.708.366.739.039.589.007.907.638.63
DO (%)42.016.2095.7579.20103.05709.65107.0594.7090.30107.15
pH6.116.936.906.286.686.626.356.526.487.34
NTU1.7730.681.100.352.713.073.210.431.083.75
Chlo (µg/L)31.064.01.002.001.002.503.004.001.002.00
PO43− (mg/L)2.2001.5501.5001.1501.2500.0600.0700.0500.0650.050
NH3 (mg/L)4.5316.3720.1400.0180.0490.0230.0360.000.1820.024
NO2 (mg/L)0.0000.0070.0000.0000.0000.0330.0490.0000.0000.168
Wet–warm°C27.9628.2224.5425.5124.9425.5125.4625.4525.4924.53
Cond (μS/cm)258.082.075.576.574.088.086.573.075.580.5
DO (mg/L)3.8512.487.455.238.357.096.576.456.274.24
DO (%)49.10159.988.9564.75100.888.0082.4580.6079.1055.35
pH7.058.656.496.396.746.406.376.136.297.33
NTU13.4617.6320.639.1018.6723.9824.1921.3921.8140.78
Chlo (µg/L)73.529.50.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
PO43− (mg/L)1.3100.3000.1250.0000.0550.0350.050.0450.0000.065
NH3 (mg/L)8.8260.8270.0790.2250.0000.0550.1090.1270.0910.091
NO2 (mg/L)0.0690.0490.0350.0590.0580.0660.0580.0410.0460.064
Table 2. Grain-size parameters (mean grain size, median grain size, sorting, skewness, and kurtosis), sediment classification (mean, sorting, asymmetry, kurtosis, and Folk’s classification), and sediment content (organic matter (mg/g), carbonates (%), total organic carbon—TOC (mg/g), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP)) of sediments from sampling sites collected during cold–dry and wet–warm seasons in the Guandu River basin, Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil. Sampling sites are presented by codes, as shown in Figure 1, and comprise distinct freshwater systems, such as lotic waters (ST3, ST5, ST6, and ST7), lentic waters (ST1, ST2, and ST4), and reservoirs (ST8, ST9, and ST10).
Table 2. Grain-size parameters (mean grain size, median grain size, sorting, skewness, and kurtosis), sediment classification (mean, sorting, asymmetry, kurtosis, and Folk’s classification), and sediment content (organic matter (mg/g), carbonates (%), total organic carbon—TOC (mg/g), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP)) of sediments from sampling sites collected during cold–dry and wet–warm seasons in the Guandu River basin, Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil. Sampling sites are presented by codes, as shown in Figure 1, and comprise distinct freshwater systems, such as lotic waters (ST3, ST5, ST6, and ST7), lentic waters (ST1, ST2, and ST4), and reservoirs (ST8, ST9, and ST10).
VariablesST1ST2ST3ST4ST5ST6ST7ST8ST9ST10
Cold–dryGrain size parameters
Φmean3.714.734.115.212.653.141.242.871.982.68
Φmedian3.514.533.934.902.583.141.293.051.902.84
Sorting (Φ)2.102.091.922.051.263.451.572.511.842.95
Skewness0.190.170.180.240.231.73−0.01−0.070.120.03
Kurtosis1.151.091.151.031.300.321.201.181.850.77
Sediment classification *
MeanVFSCSCSMSFSVFSMSFSMSFS
SortingVPSVPSPSVPSPSPSPSVPSPSVPS
AsymmetryPAPAPAPAPAVPAASASPAAS
KurtosisLMLMLLLLVLP
Folk’s classificationMSSMMSSMSMSGSSGMSSGMSSGMSSGMS
Sediment content
OM (mg/g)0.6300.3700.8900.6500.3300.3900.4600.6600.4000.620
Carbonates (%)3.4705.0203.7604.2900.9606.6400.7002.7601.2101.100
C (mg/g)59.9448.3825.6815.101.5600.6601.32036.532.29011.45
N (mg/g)5.0004.8502.1501.5800.2400.0600.1701.8200.2701.000
P (mg/g)0.8962.3940.9220.7320.3531.4600.1710.4810.3160.320
Wet–warmGrain size parameters
Φmean0.891.810.320.782.552.091.611.371.832.30
Φmedian0.712.030.230.832.562.121.90−0.362.281.91
Sorting (Φ)1.931.991.931.381.830.782.242.882.682.64
Skewness0.19−0.050.37−0.07−0.030.040.010.90−0.040.27
Kurtosis1.200.770.750.931.600.911.130.550.640.96
Sediment classification *
MeanCSMSCSCSFSFSMSMSMSFS
SortingPSPSPSPSPSMSVPSVPSVPSVPS
AsymmetryPAASVPAASASASASVPAASPA
KurtosisLPPMVLMLVPVPM
Folk’s classificationSGSSGMSSGSSGSSGMSSSGMSSGMSSGMSSGMS
Sediment content
OM (mg/g)0.4200.9400.7600.0900.6700.2100.8401.1600.8100.500
Carbonates (%)0.9302.3901.1500.5601.4701.5301.0601.1102.5300.420
C (mg/g)2.61026.549.1400.5508.8000.4403.6103.66019.935.540
N (mg/g)0.2901.7900.5900.0000.6500.0000.2900.4601.1701.210
P (mg/g)0.1691.0500.2740.0960.4250.2870.2070.1870.3960.096
* Sediment classification: 1. codes by mean: MS = medium silt, CS = coarse silt, VSF = very fine sand, FS = fine sand, MS = medium sand, CS = coarse sand; 2. codes by sorting: VPS = very poorly sorted, PS = poorly sorted, MS = moderately sorted; 3. codes by asymmetry: PA = positive asymmetry, VPA = very positive asymmetry, AS = approximately symmetric; 4. codes by kurtosis: L = leptokurtic, VL = very leptokurtic, M = mesokurtic, P = platykurtic, VP = very platykurtic; 5. codes by Kolk’s classification: SM = sandy mud, MS = muddy sand, S = sand, SGS = slightly gravelly sand, SGMS = slightly gravelly muddy sand.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rodrigues, N.; Miyahira, I.C.; Rodrigues, A.J.S.; Santos, L.N.; Neves, R.A.F. Environmental Pollution and Biological Invasions Threaten Native Freshwater Infaunal Bivalves in the Guandu River Basin, Southeast Brazil. Limnol. Rev. 2025, 25, 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/limnolrev25020024

AMA Style

Rodrigues N, Miyahira IC, Rodrigues AJS, Santos LN, Neves RAF. Environmental Pollution and Biological Invasions Threaten Native Freshwater Infaunal Bivalves in the Guandu River Basin, Southeast Brazil. Limnological Review. 2025; 25(2):24. https://doi.org/10.3390/limnolrev25020024

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rodrigues, Nathália, Igor C. Miyahira, Antonio J. S. Rodrigues, Luciano N. Santos, and Raquel A. F. Neves. 2025. "Environmental Pollution and Biological Invasions Threaten Native Freshwater Infaunal Bivalves in the Guandu River Basin, Southeast Brazil" Limnological Review 25, no. 2: 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/limnolrev25020024

APA Style

Rodrigues, N., Miyahira, I. C., Rodrigues, A. J. S., Santos, L. N., & Neves, R. A. F. (2025). Environmental Pollution and Biological Invasions Threaten Native Freshwater Infaunal Bivalves in the Guandu River Basin, Southeast Brazil. Limnological Review, 25(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/limnolrev25020024

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop