Abstract
The purpose of the present paper is to investigate some characterizations for the Wright functions to be in the subclasses . Several sufficient conditions are obtained for the normalized Wright functions to be in these classes. Results obtained in this paper are new and their usefulness is put forth by several corollaries.
1. Introduction, Definitions and Preliminaries
It is well known that special functions play an important role in geometric function theory. It is also well known that the application area of special functions is not limited to the theory of geometric functions. There are wide ranges of applications of these functions in many problems as well as in other branches of mathematics and applied sciences.
In this paper, we will examine the function
named after the British Mathematician E. M. Wright. This function appeared for the first time in the case λ > 0 in connection with Wright’s investigations in the asymptotic theory of partitions [1]. Later on, many other applications were found in Mikusinski operational calculus and in the theory of integral transforms of the Hankel type. Furthermore, extending the methods of Lie groups in partial differential equations to the partial differential equations of fractional order, it was shown that some of the group-invariant solutions of these equations can be given in terms of the Wright and the generalized Wright functions. Recently, Wright functions have appeared in papers related to partial differential equations of fractional order. It was found that the corresponding Green functions can be represented in terms of the Wright functions [2,3]. A series of papers are devoted to the application of the Wright functions in partial differential equations of fractional order extending the classical diffusion and wave equations [4]. Mainardi obtained the result for a fractional diffusion wave equation in terms of the fractional Green function involving the Wright functions [5]. The scale-variant solutions of some partial differential equations of fractional order were obtained in terms of special cases of the generalized Wright functions by Buckwar and Luchko [6] and Luchko and Gorenflo [7].
If λ is a positive rational number, then the Wright function φ(λ, μ, z) can be represented in terms of the more familiar generalized hypergeometric functions (see [8], Section 2.1). In particular, when λ = 1 and μ = p + 1, the functions φ(1, p + 1; −z2/4) are expressed in terms of the Bessel functions Jp(z), given as follows:
Furthermore, the function is known as the generalized Bessel function (sometimes it is also called the Bessel-Wright function). Also, the Wright function generalizes various simple functions such as the Array function, the Whittaker function, (Wright-type) entire auxiliary functions, etc. For the details, we refer to [8].
Let be the class of analytic functions in the open unit disk , normalized by of the form
Also, let denote the subclasses of consisting of functions which are, respectively, starlike and convex of order in the open unit disk . Thus, we have [9,10]
In the special case, are starlike and convex functions, respectively.
An interesting generalization of the functions, the classes and are provided by the classes and of functions , which satisfies the following conditions:
respectively.
Clearly, for , we have and .
Remark 1.1.
For , observe that .
Note that the Wright function defined by Equation (1) does not belong to class . Thus, it is natural to consider the following normalization of the Wright function:
and
Easily, we can write
Furthermore, observe that and are satisfied in the following equations:
where .
Also,
Here, is the normalized Bessel function.
Several researchers have studied classes of analytic functions involving special function to find different conditions such that the members of have certain geometric properties such as starlikeness and convexity in . There is extensive literature dealing with various properties, generalizations and applications of different types of hypergeometric functions [4,11,12,13,14,15,16,17].
Recently, there have been many studies about various properties of hypergeometric functions. On this matter, one can see the works [8,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. In these studies, geometric properties such as starlikeness, convexity and univalency have usually been investigated. Furthermore, in the work by Dziok and Srivastava in [18,19], the analytic function classes related with the generalized hypergeometric function were studied. For these classes, coefficient analysis, distortion theorems, extreme points and the radii of convexity and starlikeness are given. In [20], classes related to some generalized Fox-Wright hypergeometric functions and convolution operations were taken and their properties were researched. Moreover, in [21] it was shown that Dziok-Srivastava and Srivastava-Wright operators were defined from to and a criterion was given for these operators to be univalent. In [22], univalence, starlikeness and convexity of the following generalized hypergeometric function given in the formula below were investigated:
Furthermore, in this work, applications of generalized hypergeometric functions were given.
In the works mentioned above, various properties of generalized hypergeometric functions were investigated.
In the geometric function theory, investigating geometric properties of an analytic function given in the open unit disc is a research subject. On this subject, there are many works such as [11,12,13,17]. In [23], Prajapat investigated some geometric properties such as starlikeness and convexity of the normalized Wright functions and . Investigating geometric properties of the normalized Wright functions and in a class more generalized than the class of starlike and convex functions is also a research interest. In this paper, we investigate the normalized Wright functions and in the classes of and which are generalizations of and , respectively. Several sufficient conditions for the normalized Wright functions and to be in the classes of and are given. From the obtained results, using specific values for parameters, better results than those of previous results found in the literature are obtained.
The following lemmas will be required in our investigation.
Lemma 1.1.
[24] A function belongs to the class if
Lemma 1.2.
[24] A function belongs to the class if
2. Sufficient Conditions for the Wright Functions to be Classes and
In this section, we will give sufficient conditions for the normalized Wright functions to be in the classes .
Theorem 2.1.
Let and assume the following condition is satisfied:
Then, the normalized Wright function belongs to the class .
Proof.
Since
by virtue of Lemma 1.1, it suffices to show that
Let
Setting , and by simple computation, we get
Under the hypothesis , the inequality , for , holds. This inequality is equivalent to
Here, is the Pochhammer (or Appell) symbol defined in terms of the Euler gamma function. Using Equation (14), we obtain
Further, the inequality
holds and this is equivalent to Using Equation (15), we obtain
Hence,
This completes the proof of Theorem 2.1.
Theorem 2.2.
Let and assume the following condition is satisfied:
Then, normalized Wright function belongs to the class .
Proof.
Since
and by virtue of Lemma 1.2, it suffices to show that
Let
Setting
and by simple computation, we can write
Using Equations (14) and (15), we obtain
Thus,
which is equivalent to
This evidently completes the proof of Theorem 2.2.
By setting in Theorems 2.1 and 2.2, we arrive at the following corollaries.
Corollary 2.1.
The normalized Wright function belongs to the class if and the following condition is satisfied:
Corollary 2.2.
The normalized Wright function belongs to the class if and the following condition is satisfied:
By taking in Corollary 2.1 and Corollary 2.2, we obtain the following corollaries.
Corollary 2.3.
Let and , where is the root of the equation
then .
Corollary 2.4.
Let and , where is the root of the equation
then .
Theorem 2.3.
Let and assume the following condition is satisfied:
Then, normalized Wright function belongs to the class .
Proof.
Since
and by virtue of Lemma 1.1, it suffices to show that
Let
By simple computation, we obtain
Using Equations (14) and (15), with , we get
Thus,
which is equivalent to
Thus, the proof of Theorem 2.3 is complete.
By setting in Theorem 2.3, we arrive at the following corollary.
Corollary 2.5.
The normalized Wright function belongs to the class if and the following condition is satisfied:
By taking in Corollary 2.5, we obtain the following corollary.
Corollary 2.6.
Let and , where is the root of the equation
then .
Theorem 2.4.
Let and assume the following condition is satisfied:
then normalized Wright function belongs to the class .
Proof.
The function belongs to the class if and only if is in the class , but from Equation (11) . Then, using Theorem 2.1, we complete the proof of this theorem.
By setting in Theorem 2.4, we arrive at the following corollary.
Corollary 2.7.
The normalized Wright function belongs to the class if and the following condition is satisfied:
By taking in Corollary 2.7, we obtain the following corollary.
Corollary 2.8.
Let and , where is the root of the equation
then .
Remark 2.1.
Note that the results obtained in Corollary 2.3 and Corollary 2.8 are better versions of the results given by Prajapat (see [23], (p. 206, Theorem 2.7 (a), (c))).
3. Sufficient Conditions for the Normalized Bessel Function
In this section, we will give sufficient conditions for the normalized Bessel function to be in the classes and .
Setting in Theorem 2.1, from Equation (13) we obtain the following results.
Theorem 3.1.
The normalized Bessel function belongs to the class if
Corollary 3.1.
The normalized Bessel function belongs to the class if
Corollary 3.2.
The normalized Bessel function belongs to the class if , where is the root of the equation
Setting in Theorem 2.2, from Equation (13) we obtain the following results.
Theorem 3.2.
The normalized Bessel function belongs to the class if
Corollary 3.3.
The normalized Bessel function belongs to the class if
Corollary 3.4.
The normalized Bessel function belongs to the class if , where is the root of the equation
4. Concluding Remarks
In this study, two kinds of normalizations of the Wright function are considered. These normalized Wright functions are examined in the generalized classes of the starlike and convex function classes. In the study, several sufficient conditions for the normalized Wright functions are obtained. The results obtained in this study are compared with the results obtained by Prajapat [23].
Acknowledgments
I would like to express my gratitude to the anonymous reviewers for the careful reading of the paper and for their invaluable comments that helped me to improve it considerably.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
References
- Wright, E.M. On the coefficients of power series having exponential singularities. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 1933, 8, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podlubny, I. Fractional Differential Equations; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Samko, S.G.; Kilbas, A.A.; Marichev, O.I. Fractional Integrals and Derivatives: Theory and Applications; Gordon and Breach: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Kilbas, A.A.; Srivastava, H.M.; Trujillo, J.J. Theory and applications of fractional differential equations. In North-Holland Mathematical Studies; Elsevier (North-Holland) Science Publishers: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; Volume 204. [Google Scholar]
- Mainardi, F. Fractional Calculus: Some Basic Problems in Continuum and Statistical Mechanics; Springer Verlag: Wien, Austria, 1971. [Google Scholar]
- Buckwar, E.; Luchko, Y. Invariance of a partial differential equation of fractional order under the Lie group of scaling transformations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1998, 227, 81–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luchko, Y.; Gorenflo, R. Scale-invariant solutions of a partial differential equation of fractional order. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 1998, 1, 63–78. [Google Scholar]
- Gorenflo, R.; Luchko, Y.; Mainardi, F. Analytic properties and applications of Wright functions. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 1999, 2, 383–414. [Google Scholar]
- Duren, P.L. Univalent Functions, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenshaften, Bd. 259; Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Current Topics in Analytic Function Theory; Srivastava, H.M.; Owa, S. (Eds.) World Scientific Publishing Company: Singapore, 1992.
- Baricz, A.; Ponnusamy, S. Starlikeness and convexity of generalized Bessel functions. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 2010, 21, 641–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, S.S.; Mocanu, P.T. Univalence of Gaussian and confluent hypergeometric functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1990, 110, 333–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ponnusamy, S.; Ronning, F. Geometric properties for convolutions of hypergeometric functions and functions with the derivative in a half plane. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 1999, 8, 121–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ponnusamy, S.; Singh, V.; Vasundhra, P. Starlikeness and convexity of an integral transform. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 2004, 15, 267–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ponnusamy, S.; Vuorinen, M. Univalence and convexity properties for Gaussian hypergeometric functions. Rocky Mountain J. Math. 2001, 31, 327–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ponnusamy, S.; Vuorinen, M. Univalence and convexity properties for confluent hypergeometric functions. Complex Var. Elliptic Equ. 1998, 36, 73–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yagmur, N.; Orhan, H. Hardy space of generalized Struve functions. Complex Var. Elliptic Equ. 2014, 59, 929–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dziok, J.; Srivastava, H.M. Classes of analytic functions associated with the generalized hypergeometric function. Appl. Math. Comput. 1999, 103, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dziok, J.; Srivastava, H.M. Certain subclasses of analytic functions associated with the generalized hypergeometric function. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 2003, 14, 7–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srivastava, H.M. Some Fox-Wright generalized hypergeometric functions and associated families of convolution operators. Appl. Anal. Discrete Math. 2007, 1, 56–71. [Google Scholar]
- Kiryakova, V. Criteria for univalence of the Dziok-Srivastava and the Srivastava-Wright operators in the class A. Appl. Math. Comput. 2011, 218, 883–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Owa, S.; Srivastava, H.M. Univalent and starlike generalized hypergeometric functions. Can. J. Math. 1987, 39, 1057–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prajapat, J.K. Certain geometric properties of the Wright function. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 2015, 26, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thulasiram, T.; Suchithra, K.; Sudharsan, T.V.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G. Some inclusion results associated with certain subclass of analytic functions involving Hohlov operator. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fis. Nat. Ser.–A Math. 2014, 108, 711–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2016 by the author; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).