Next Article in Journal
Generation of Controlled Liquid–Liquid Slug Flow by Interlocking Two Diaphragm Pumps
Previous Article in Journal
Simulation of CO2 Capture Process in Flue Gas from Oxy-Fuel Combustion Plant and Effects of Properties of Absorbent
Previous Article in Special Issue
Role of Ionic Liquids in Composites in Analytical Sample Preparation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Recent Advances on Ionic Liquid Uses in Separation Techniques

by
María José Ruiz-Ángel
1,* and
Samuel Carda-Broch
2
1
Departament de Química Analítica, Universitat de València, c/Dr. Moliner 50, 46100 Valencia, Spain
2
Departament de Química Física i Analítica, Universitat Jaume I, Av, Vicent Sos Baynat s/n, 12006 Castelló de la Plana, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Separations 2022, 9(4), 96; https://doi.org/10.3390/separations9040096
Submission received: 5 April 2022 / Accepted: 8 April 2022 / Published: 11 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances on Ionic Liquid Uses in Separation Techniques)

1. Introduction

Ionic liquids (ILs) are non-molecular solvents; specifically, molten salts with low melting points, often below 100 °C and even below room temperature, thus allowing these solvents to remain liquid [1,2,3]. Chemically, they are formed by a bulky organic cation and a variety of usually smaller inorganic/organic anions to achieve electrical neutrality. Therefore, the number of combinations of cations and anions with substituted head-groups is unlimited, whereas the hydrophobicity range is guaranteed by the alkyl chain length of the organic moieties [4]. The physico-chemical properties of ILs include volatility, flammability, thermal stability, viscosity, solvation ability, an electrochemical window and relatively low toxicity, among others [1,2]. All of them can be tuned and modulated by the appropriate selection of both IL cation and anion—but what makes ILs so attractive? The main reason for their popularity is that they are considered a greener alternative to pollutant organic solvents, traditionally used in many technical and scientific fields, to decrease the environmental impact and overall risk of chemical exposure. Consequently, the scientific interest in ILs has been extended to different fields of chemistry with a high impact. In analytical chemistry, ILs have attracted special attention in separation techniques, where new ILs with specific properties, such as amphiphilic, magnetic and chiral properties, among others, are continuously being developed for new applications [3]. All this research has resulted in a rapid growth of the literature on the development and use of ILs, with an almost exponential increase, which usually involves books and Special Issues, such as the one we presented in Separations in 2019–2020.
The Special Issue (SI), entitled “Recent Advances on Ionic Liquid Uses in Separation Techniques”, was devoted to applications of ILs in chromatography, extraction for sample preparation and related techniques. The scope was extended to deep eutectic solvents (DES), which are a promising class of solvents with similar properties to ILs [5]. The SI gathered the collaborations of different authors with wide experience in the IL or DES fields that discussed the state-of-the-art preparation and application of IL-based composites and hydrophobic DES in analytical sample preparation, or presented new results in different HPLC modes for the analysis of basic compounds.

2. Summary of the Special Issue

Two reviews and two original research papers dealing with the use of ILs or DES in liquid chromatography and extraction techniques were published in the SI after the corresponding peer-review process. The topics and the nature of the related papers are described here.
Complex samples are difficult to directly analyze due to the presence of target analytes at trace concentration levels in an environment containing high contents of certain sample matrix components, which can act as interfering species and give rise to an undesirable matrix effect. In this context, sample preparation, referring to all steps carried out in the laboratory before the final measurement with the analytical instruments, plays an essential role to ensure the maximum quality of the results. Conventional extraction methods, both in their liquid and solid-phase modes, are extensively used for sample preparation [6,7]. It should be indicated that sorbent-based extraction methods are preferred over liquid-based in terms of simplicity, cost effectiveness, and robustness. Among sorbent-based analytical sample clean-up procedures, solid-phase extraction (SPE) is the most used preparation method worldwide, with a wide variety of commercially available SPE sorbents for different applications [7,8]. However, drawbacks related to the reusability of SPE devices, and low selectivity and extraction efficiency, still persist. In this context, ILs have been revealed as excellent sorbent or sorbent dopant materials to overcome these problems.
The review presented by Gutiérrez-Serpa et al. [9] gives an overview of the incorporation of ILs, such as polymeric ILs, and the combination of ILs with other materials (magnetic particles, carbon, silica and metal–organic frameworks) to prepare solid IL-based composites, in different SPE devices. In these cases, the IL strongly modifies the final characteristics of the composite materials, which are more homogeneous, porous and permeable, and also participates in the extraction of the substances of interest. It should be noted that imidazolium-based ILs, mainly methyl and alkyl chains between 4 and 16 atoms, were selected in practically all the applications described. The effect of different lengths of the alkyl chain and different anions was frequently explored, as opposed to the tunability of ILs. The authors concluded that selective sorbents with specific properties for certain applications should be prepared and rigorously investigated.
It should be noted that the most studied imidazolium-based ILs, and especially those associated with fluorinated anions, show low biodegradability and biocompatibility, and high toxicity and cost [10,11]. To address this problem, DES are an alternative that share most of the properties of ILs, but unlike ILs, they comprise mixtures of at least two compounds [12], which may limit the reproducibility and accuracy of analyses. Dwamena reviewed the recent advances in a specific type of DES, hydrophobic DES (HDES), focusing on their synthesis, applications, challenges, and future perspectives [13]. The concept of HDES was introduced by van Osch and co-workers in 2015 from the combination of diverse quaternary ammonium salts with decanoic acid [14]. The simple preparation of HDES, together with their low toxicity and water-accessible nature, makes them promising in the liquid–liquid extraction of non-polar analytes and transition metals from an aqueous environment over hydrophobic ILs or conventional organic solvents, although drawbacks related to their high viscosity have been addressed. Nevertheless, as indicated by the author, most research has concentrated mainly on hydrophilic DES. Therefore, the use of HDES is still in its infancy, and extensive work is still required.
In reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC), solutes are retained using conventional alkyl-bonded silica phase columns (octyl or octadecyl) according to their hydrophobicity [15]. However, residual silanols present on these stationary phases are negatively charged at the typical working pH range (between 2 and 8), and are able to establish additional ion-exchange interactions with cationic compounds, increasing their retention and giving rise to broad and asymmetrical peaks [16,17]. The reduction of this process, known as the “silanol effect”, is of great importance in the analysis of basic compounds, which are usually of pharmaceutical interest [18]. The most practical approach to minimize or suppress the undesirable influence of silanols on the chromatographic performance of basic drugs is the addition of different types of additives to the hydro-organic mobile phase [19,20]. Among the common reagents traditionally used to mask the silanophilic activity (i.e., amines, surfactants, etc.), ILs have become a serious alternative due to the significant improvement in peak performance observed with their use [21]. The two research articles included in the SI involved the use of imidazolium ILs differing in their cations/anions as modifiers of the chromatographic behavior of β-adrenoceptor antagonists.
Ruiz-Angel [22] applied a mathematical model based on two chemical equilibria to estimate the association constants between the solutes and alkyl-bonded stationary phase, as well as those between solutes and the additive in the mobile phase. The constant values, together with the changes in retention and peak shape, revealed information about the retention mechanism and reducing the “silanol effect”.
Peris-García et al. compared the chromatographic performance obtained by the addition of ILs with the mobile phase in RPLC for the analysis of a group of β-adrenoceptor antagonists, with the results obtained by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) [23]. ILs are able to adsorb on alkyl-bonded stationary phases, changing their behavior, whereas in HILIC, water forms an adsorbed layer on the surface of the polar stationary phase, which modifies the selectivity with regard to RPLC [24]. In both chromatographic modes, RPLC with added IL and HILIC, the variety of interactions gave rise to complex retention mechanisms, but they were a viable solution to the problem of poor peak shape for basic compounds. However, the use of HILIC is limited by the polarity range of the solutes.
Further topics related to the use of ILs in analytical chemistry remain to be dealt with. New findings and applications are frequently reported, and more research is still needed involving separation techniques and ILs.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation and review, M.J.R.-Á.; writing—review and editing, S.C.-B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grant PID2019-106708GB-I00 funded by MCIN (Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain)/AEI/10.13039/501100011033.

Acknowledgments

Thank you to all the authors that made this Special Issue possible, and the Separations editorial team for their trust and support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Poole, C.F. Chromatographic and Spectroscopic Methods for the Determination of Solvent Properties of Room Temperature Ionic Liquids. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1037, 49–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ho, T.D.; Zhang, C.; Hantao, L.W.; Anderson, J.L. Ionic Liquids in Analytical Chemistry: Fundamentals, Advances, and Perspectives. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 262–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Berthod, A.; Ruiz-Ángel, M.J.; Carda-Broch, S. Recent Advances on Ionic Liquid Uses in Separation Techniques. J. Chromatogr. A 2018, 1559, 2–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hayes, R.; Warr, G.G.; Atkin, R. Structure and Nanostructure in Ionic Liquids. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 6357–6426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Silva, F.A.; Freire, M.G. Achievements and Perspectives of using Deep Eutectic Solvents in the Analytical Chemistry Field. In Ionic Liquids in Analytical Chemistry: New Insights and Recent Developments, 1st ed.; Carda-Broch, S., Ruiz-Ángel, M.J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 33–71. [Google Scholar]
  6. da Silva Buratp, J.S.; Vargas Medina, D.A.; de Toffoli, A.L.; Soares Maciel, E.V.; Lanças, F.M. Recent Advances and Trends in Miniaturized Sample Preparation Techniques. J. Sep. Sci. 2020, 43, 202–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Faraji, M.; Yamini, Y.; Gholami, M. Recent Advances and Trends in Applications of Solid-Phase Extraction Techniques in Food and Environmental Analysis. Chromatographia 2019, 82, 1207–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bielicka-Daszkiewicz, K.; Voelkel, A. Theoretical and Experimental Methods of Determination of the Breakthrough Volume of SPE Sorbents. Talanta 2009, 80, 614–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gutiérrez-Serpa, A.; Napolitano-Tabares, P.I.; Šulc, J.; Pacheco-Fernández, I.; Pino, V. Role of Ionic Liquids in Composites in Analytical Sample Preparation. Separations 2020, 7, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Egorova, K.S.; Ananikov, V.P. Toxicity of Ionic Liquids: Eco(cyto)activity as Complicated, but Unavoidable Parameter for Task-Specific Optimization. ChemSusChem 2014, 7, 336–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Passos, H.; Freire, M.G.; Coutinho, J.A.P. Ionic liquid Solutions as Extractive Solvents for Value-Added Compounds from Biomass. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 4786–4815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Płotka-Wasylka, J.; de la Guardia, M.; Andruch, V.; Vilková, M. Deep Eutectic Solvents vs. Ionic Liquids: Similarities and Differences. Microchem. J. 2020, 159, 105539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dwamena, A.K. Recent Advances in Hydrophobic Deep Eutectic Solvents for Extraction. Separations 2019, 6, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. van Osch, D.J.; Zubeir, L.F.; van den Bruinhorst, A.; Rocha, M.A.; Kroon, M.C. Hydrophobic Deep Eutectic Solvents as Water-Immiscible Extractants. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 4518–4521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Snyder, L.R.; Kirkland, J.J.; Dolan, J.W. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography, 3rd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  16. Nawrocki, J. The silanol group and its role in liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1997, 779, 29–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Engelhardt, H.; Blay, C.; Saar, J. Reversed Phase Chromatography: The Mystery of Surface Silanols. Chromatographia 2005, 62, S19–S29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. McCalley, D.V. The Challenges of the Analysis of Basic Compounds by High Performance Liquid Chromatography: Some Possible Approaches for Improved Separations. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217, 858–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Calabuig-Hernández, S.; García-Alvarez-Coque, M.C.; Ruiz-Angel, M.J. Performance of Amines as Silanol Suppressors in Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 2016, 1465, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ruiz-Ángel, M.J.; Torres-Lapasió, J.R.; García-Álvarez-Coque, M.C.; Carda-Broch, S. Retention Mechanisms for Basic Drugs in the Submicellar and Micellar Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatographic Modes. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 9705–9713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. García-Alvarez-Coque, M.C.; Ruiz-Angel, M.J.; Berthod, A.; Carda-Broch, S. On the Use of Ionic Liquids as Mobile Phase Additives in High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Anal. Chim. Acta 2015, 883, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ruiz-Ángel, M.J. Estimation of Solute-Stationary Phase and Solute-Mobile Phase Interactions in the Presence of Ionic Liquids. Separations 2019, 6, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Peris-García, E.; Burgos-Gil, R.; García-Alvarez-Coque, M.C.; Ruiz-Angel, M.J. Hydrophilic Liquid Chromatography versus Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography in the Absence and the Presence of 1-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium Chloride for the Analysis of Basic Compounds. Separations 2020, 7, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. McCalley, D.V. Understanding and manipulating the separation in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2018, 1523, 49–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ruiz-Ángel, M.J.; Carda-Broch, S. Recent Advances on Ionic Liquid Uses in Separation Techniques. Separations 2022, 9, 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations9040096

AMA Style

Ruiz-Ángel MJ, Carda-Broch S. Recent Advances on Ionic Liquid Uses in Separation Techniques. Separations. 2022; 9(4):96. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations9040096

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ruiz-Ángel, María José, and Samuel Carda-Broch. 2022. "Recent Advances on Ionic Liquid Uses in Separation Techniques" Separations 9, no. 4: 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations9040096

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop