Next Article in Journal
Pros and Cons of Separation, Fractionation and Cleanup for Enhancement of the Quantitative Analysis of Bitumen-Derived Organics in Process-Affected Waters—A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Rational Fabrication of Benzene-Linked Porous Polymers for Selective CO2 Capture
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis of Carboxymethylcellulose–Acrylamide–Montmorillonite Composite Hydrogels for Wastewater Purification

1
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
2
College of Materials and Environmental Engineering, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Separations 2023, 10(12), 582; https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10120582
Submission received: 3 November 2023 / Revised: 17 November 2023 / Accepted: 22 November 2023 / Published: 23 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Materials in Separation Science)

Abstract

:
The three-dimensional network and ample pore structure of novel hydrogel materials enable outstanding adsorption performance for pollutants such as methylene blue (MB) and Cr6+ ions in wastewater. In order to develop an environmentally friendly hydrogel with high adsorption performance and low cost, a type of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) composite hydrogel was synthesised with montmorillonite (MMT) via chain radical polymerization, which gives it great potential for application in the field of wastewater purification. A series of hydrogel samples were characterised through SEM, FTIR and nitrogen porosimetry analysis, indicating the successful intercalation of MMT nanosheets into the hydrogel crosslinking network. The mass ratio of CMC to MMT, the amounts of adsorbent, the initial concentration of wastes, pH, and the adsorption temperature were investigated and optimised for hydrogel adsorption performance. When the initial concentration of MB is 60 mg/L, pH is 7, the dosage of MB is 0.5 g/L, and the adsorption temperature is 30 °C, the hydrogel sample the highest adsorption capability for MB removal, with an adsorption amount of 112.9 mg/g. When the initial concentration of Cr6+ is 10 mg/L with a pH of 7, the highest adsorption capacity of the hydrogel for Cr6+ removal is 1.35 mg/g. The fitting results of the isothermal models, the kinetic models, internal particle diffusion models and the thermodynamics of the experimental data of the adsorbate adsorption process show that the adsorption of MB by hydrogel is a spontaneous segmented process of multi-layer physical and chemical adsorption. Additionally, the adsorption of Cr6+ ions by hydrogel is a spontaneous segmented process of multi-layer physical adsorption.

1. Introduction

In recent years, with the rapid growth of the population and the high speed of industrialization, water pollution has gradually evolved into one of the most important environmental problems in society [1]. The main sources of water pollution are heavy metal ions and organic dyes [2,3]. Heavy metal ions, such as Cr6+, Cd2+, Hg2+, Pb2+, etc., not only seriously pollute the water body, soil, and the atmosphere, but also enter the human body through the food chain and the bio-concentration effect. This inhibits human growth and development, and excessive accumulation can even lead to diseases such as cancer, high blood pressure and kidney failure. As one of the most widely used dyes in the textile industry, methylene blue (MB) not only inhibits the photosynthesis of aquatic organisms, but also seriously disrupts the ecological balance of water bodies. It can also cause dizziness, nausea, respiratory distress, diarrhoea, vomiting, anaemia, and even neurological damage when ingested into the human body [4,5].
Traditional wastewater treatment techniques include chemical oxidation [6,7], biodegradation [8,9], adsorption [10,11,12], membrane separation [13,14], flocculation [15,16], chemical precipitation [17,18,19] and ion exchange [20,21]. Among them, adsorption method is considered as one of the most effective methods for the removal of heavy metal ions and organic dyes due to its simplicity of operation, wide range of application, cost-effectiveness and environmental friendliness. In recent years, traditional adsorbents such as artificial resins and activated carbon have been widely used because of their advantages such as low cost. However, they are subject to many limitations due to their low adsorption efficiency, easy clogging and poor regeneration performance [22,23]. These adsorption materials, such as zeolites [24], metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) [25,26,27], hydrogels [28,29], and aerogels [30,31,32,33], have gradually appeared in people’s field of vision.
In 1960, Wichterle and Lím synthesised the first generation of hydrogels [28]. As three-dimensional materials, hydrogels have excellent properties such as large specific surface area, high porosity, and excellent water absorption, which give them great potential for application in the field of wastewater purification [34,35]. There are many kinds of hydrogels, such as chitosan-based hydrogels [36,37], cellulose-based hydrogels [38,39], hyaluronic acid hydrogels [40,41], pectin hydrogels [42], etc. However, it is difficult for hydrogels prepared with a single material to meet application needs. Adding other materials to prepare hydrogels with excellent comprehensive properties has become the mainstream trend at present [43]. Chen et al. [29] synthesissed an agar/poly (acrylamide-co-hydroxyethyl acrylate) double-network hydrogel, which had good effect on the removal of Pd2+ and Cd2+. Li et al. [44] reported a cationic adsorbent poly (epichlorohydrin)-ethylenediamine hydrogel (PEE-Gel), and the adsorption results showed that its maximum adsorption capacity for anion dye Congo red (CR) could reach 1540 mg/g.
Carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel has functional groups such as -COOH and -OH on its backbone, which have a strong affinity for pollutants. It not only has the advantages of fast adsorption rate, high adsorption rate, and recyclability as an adsorbent, but also has good biodegradability and biocompatibility [45,46]. In addition, the three-dimensional network pore structure of cellulose hydrogel endows it with strong flexibility, permeability, and the ability to absorb and retain water [47]. Godiya et al. [39] prepared a CMC/PAM composite hydrogel using free radical polymerization of CMC and polyacrylamide (PAM), which was efficiently adsorbed through its good monoanionic affinity for Cu2+. Chen et al. [48] used sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, polyacrylic acid, and polyacrylamide as raw materials to prepare the bio-sorbent CMC-PAMA via a simple thermal cross-linking method for the adsorption of MB. It was shown that a large number of intermolecular hydrogen bonds increased the stability of the structure of CMC-PAMA, resulting in good adsorption of the cationic dye MB. However, the poor mechanical properties and single function of cellulose hydrogel greatly limit its practical application.
Montmorillonite (MMT) has great potential for application in wastewater adsorption due to its excellent cation exchange capacity and layered structure. Through techniques such as chemical peeling [49] and mechanical peeling [50], montmorillonite can be stripped into single or multiple nanosheets. Peeled MMT nanosheets (MMTNS) have small size and high dispersion, and they can be composited into the three-dimensional network structure of the hydrogel, which can effectively improve the comprehensive properties of hydrogel, including its water retention, salt resistance, mechanical strength, and thermal stability [51]. Nie et al. [52] prepared (DMAPMA-co-AA)/Mt composite hydrogel via in situ intercalation polymerization using N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) methacryloyl and acrylic acid as monomers and montmorillonite as fillers. The compressive strength of the composite hydrogel reached 54.4 kPa at 99.8% water content. Irani et al. [53] prepared acrylic–starch/montmorillonite hydrogels with good mechanical strength by adding montmorillonite to acrylic–starch through emulsion polymerization. The composite hydrogel has good water absorption up to 800 g/g.
In this work, in order to develop an hydrogel with high adsorption performance that is cost-effective, easy to operate, and environmentally friendly, MMT was introduced into the sodium carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)–acrylamide (AM) system, and a CMC-AM-MMT composite hydrogel was prepared via chain radical polymerization with N,N-methylenebis-acrylamide (MBA) as a crosslinking agent and sodium persulfate as an initiator. The effects of matrix ratio, initiator, crosslinker dosage, adsorbent dosage, shock time, temperature, and pH on the adsorption of Cr6+ and methylene blue in hydrogel were also investigated. We also carried out a variety of characterizations of hydrogels under optimal preparation conditions, explored the surface structure and properties of hydrogels, analysed the adsorption kinetics isothermal models, internal particle diffusion models and thermodynamics of hydrogels, and explained the mechanism of hydrogel adsorption of Cr6+ and methylene blue.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Chemicals including sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, acrylamide, N,N′-methylenebis-acrylamide, sodium persulfate (Na2S2O8), methylene blue, absolute ethanol, potassium dichromate, phosphoric acid, sulfuric acid, acetone, and diphenyl carbamide were purchased from Aladdin Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. MMT was purchased from Nacor Corporation (cation exchange capacity: 145 m equiv/100 g, particle size: 16–22 μm), and had not been otherwise processed before use. Reagents of analytical grade and deionised water were used for the experiments.

2.2. Preparation of CMC-AM Hydrogel

The hydrogel sample was fabricated by following a previously published procedure with necessary modifications [47]. The mass ratio of CMC was varied to investigate the optimized preparation conditions of the hydrogel sample. A certain mass of CMC was accurately weighed and dissolved in deionised water to prepare CMC solutions with different mass proportions. Subsequently, 6 wt% of AM as a monomer, 0.6 wt% of MBA as a crosslinker, and 0.6 wt% of sodium persulfate as an initiator were added to the beaker and stirred. The formed gel was removed after heating at 70 °C for 4 h. The gel was rinsed with water and soaked three times for 8 h each, and finally freeze-dried at −60 °C to obtain the prepared hydrogel samples. According to different CMC contents (1 wt%, 2 wt%, 3 wt%, 4 wt%), the hydrogel samples were labelled CMC1-AM, CMC2-AM, CMC3-AM, and CMC4-AM, respectively.

2.3. Preparation of CMC-AM-MMT Hydrogel

The preparation process of CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel was based on CMC-AM hydrogel, except for the introduction of MMT materials. A certain mass of CMC was dissolved in deionised water to prepare 3 wt% CMC solution. A certain mass of MMT was added to deionised water, and sonicated for 30 min to prepare MMT solutions with different mass fractions (0, 1 wt%, 2 wt%, 3 wt%, 4 wt%). The MMT solution was then added into the CMC solution, followed by the addition of 6 wt% of AM, 0.6 wt% of MBA and 0.6 wt% of sodium persulfate under mixing. The gel was sealed and removed after constant heating at 70 °C for 4 h. The gel was rinsed with water and soaked three times for 8 h each, and finally freeze-dried at −60 °C. The mass ratio of CMC and MMT was varied to investigate the optimised preparation conditions of the hydrogel sample. According to different CMC: MMT contents (3:1, 3:2, 3:3, 3:4), the hydrogels were labelled CMC-AM-MMT1, CMC-AM-MMT2, CMC-AM-MMT3, and CMC-AM-MMT4, respectively.

2.4. Characterization

The hydrogel samples were characterised using various techniques, including SEM, FTIR and nitrogen porosimetry analysis. A series of freeze-dried composite gel samples were sliced and glued to the conductive plate with conductive glue, and the surface was sprayed with gold and placed in a scanning electron microscope (ZEISS Merlin, Ottobrunn, Germany) to observe the morphology of the composite gel samples at a scanning voltage of 5 kV. The freeze-dried hydrogels were ground into powder and added to potassium bromide, after which they were mixed and pressed into sheets, which were then characterised via Fourier infrared spectroscopy (VERTEX 70, Ettlingen, Germany) with a scanning wavenumber ranging from 400 cm−1 to 4000 cm−1. An ASAP2460 automated specific surface area and porosity analyser was employed to obtain N2 isothermal adsorption and desorption results on the prepared CMC hydrogel at 140 °C for 12 h.

2.5. Adsorption Performance Analysis of Methylene Blue

A certain amount of hydrogel sample was added to 100 mL of methylene blue solution and put into a shaker for 6 h (160 rpm/min). The liquid was filtered through the needle filter (Aqueous phase, 0.22 μm), then 1 mL of liquid was taken, and the absorbance of the colorimetric tube sample was measured at 665 nm with a UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The residual concentration of adsorption was calculated using the standard curve, and then the removal efficiency and other parameters were calculated using the equation. The effects of CMC components, oscillation/standing conditions, hydrogel dosage, methylene blue concentration, temperature, and adsorption time on the adsorption efficiency of hydrogel were investigated.

2.6. Adsorption Performance Analysis of Cr6+ ions

A certain amount of hydrogel sample was added to 100 mL of chromium-containing wastewater simulated using potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7); this was shaken in a shaker at different temperature for 6 h (160 rpm/min). After passing through a needle filter (aqueous phase, 0.22 μm), 1 mL of liquid it was taken and diluted with water by 50 times to set the volume; sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, and colour-rendering agent (diphenyl carbamide) were added. The absorbance was measured at 540 nm with a UV-Vis spectrophotometer to determine the concentration of Cr6+ using the standard curve. The effects of Cr6+ components, simulated chromium-containing wastewater concentration, hydrogel dosage, oscillation time, temperature, and pH on the adsorption efficiency of hydrogel were investigated.

2.7. Calculation Analysis

The concentration of the wastewater before adsorption, recorded as C 0 , the concentration after adsorption, recorded as C t , and the removal rate can be calculated according to Equation (1).
η = C 0 C t C 0 × 100 %
C 0 is the initial concentration of the adsorbate (mg/L); C t is the concentration value of the adsorbed solution at the t moment (mg/L); and η is the removal efficiency of pollutants in water.
Adsorption capacity is calculated using the volume of adsorbent, calculated according to Equation (2).
Q = ( C 0 C t ) V m
C 0   a n d   C t are the same as above Equation (1); m is the mass of the hydrogel (g); V is the adsorbate solution volume (mL); and Q is the mass (mg/g) per gram of adsorbent adsorbed.
The kinetics of dye adsorption are used to simulate the relationship between time and adsorption amount during the adsorption process using suitable kinetic models such as pseudo-primary and secondary adsorption. Pseudo-primary and secondary-order equations are used as shown in Equations (3) and (4).
① Pseudo-first-order kinetic model:
Q t = Q e ( 1 e k 1 t )
Q t is the adsorption capacity (mg/g) representing the adsorption of adsorbent at time t; Q e represents the equilibrium adsorption capacity (mg/g); t is the adsorption time (min); and k1 stands for the kinetic model constant (min−1).
② Pseudo-second-order kinetic model:
Q t = Q e 2 × k 2 t 1 + Q e   × k 2 t
Q t , Q e , t are the same as in the above Equation (3); k 2 represents kinetic adsorption rate constant (g·mg−1·min−1).
The internal particle diffusion is described using the Weber and Morris (W&M) model [54]:
Q t = k W & M t 1 / 2
Q t , t are the same as in the above Equation (3); k W & M is estimated by plotting Q t vs. Q e .
Briefly, 50 mg of hydrogel was added to 200 mL MB and Cr6+ solution at a concentration of 10–100 mg/L to investigate the isothermal adsorption of MB and Cr6+. The data were fitted using the Langmuir (6) and Freundlich (7) models.
① Langmuir model:
Q e = Q m K L C e 1 + K L C e
Q m (mg/g) is the maximum adsorption capacity of hydrogel; C e (mg/L) and Q e (mg/g) are the equilibrium concentrations and the equilibrium adsorption capacity of dye or metal ion in aqueous solution, respectively; and KL (L/mg) are the Langmuir isotherm constants.
② Freundlich model:
Q e = K F C e 1 n
Q t , Q e , t are the same as in the above Formula (6); the parameters Kf (mg(1−1/n)·L1/n·g−1) and n are the adsorption capacity coefficient and adsorption intensity coefficients, respectively.
The values of thermodynamic parameters such as change in Gibbs free energy ( Δ G ), enthalpy ( Δ H ), and entropy ( Δ S ) were calculated using the following equations [55,56]:
Δ G = R T l n K o
l n K L = Δ S R Δ H R T
Ko is the Langmuir constant (L·mol−1) and equal to Q e / C e , R is the universal gas constant (8.314 J·mol−1·K−1), and T is the reaction temperature (K). The values of Δ H and Δ S are obtained from the slope and intercept of the line plotted using l n K o versus 1 / T , respectively.
The bulk density of hydrogels ( ρ a ) is their weight-to-volume ratio. The porosity of hydrogels is calculated following Equation (10):
φ = 1 ρ a ρ b × 100 %
where ρ b (g·cm−3) is the average skeletal density of the hydrogel.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of the CMC Hydrogel

As shown in Figure 1, the hydrogel sample was synthesised via chain radical polymerization with CMC and AM. In the presence of the Na2S2O8 initiator, the CMC portion is performed as the main skeleton of the hydrogel, and the sulfate anion attacks the hydrogen atoms on the hydroxyl group of the CMC backbone to produce a redox system, thereby initiating the grafting of AM on the CMC. In the presence of a crosslinker (MBA), the AM chain is lengthened and crosslinked. Finally, a complete CMC gel network system is formed. MMT can play a role in supporting the gel skeleton structure, as well as providing the active adsorption site for containment removal.
The infrared spectra of the composite hydrogel are shown in Figure 2. The characteristic peaks at 3335 cm−1, 2920 cm−1 and 1315 cm−1 represent the vibration of the –OH bond, the stretching vibration of the C-H bond, and the bending vibration of the CMC bond, respectively [57,58]. The ether bond of the CMC ring appeared at 1199 cm−1. It should be noted that the composite hydrogels show relatively obvious new characteristic absorption peaks at 3178 cm−1, 1610 cm−1 and 1428 cm−1, assigned to the characteristic peaks of -NH, C=O and C-N in the -CO-NH2 groups in polyacrylamide, respectively [47]. The intensity of the peak at 1075 cm−1 of the CMC is significantly weakened due to its graft copolymerization with AM. The peak at 1648 cm−1 is attributed to carboxamide group vibration, and the displacement of the peak from 1673 cm−1 to 1648 cm−1 in the composite hydrogel confirms the grafting of AM onto the CMC backbone [59], suggesting a successful polymerization of PAM in the network of CMC gel. The MMT shows an absorption peak at 3633 cm−1, which belongs to the hydroxyl group vibration from the Al-OH structure. However, this peak disappeared in the composite hydrogel, indicating that AM was grafted onto MMT. The bands at 1032 cm−1 and 452 cm−1 are assigned to the Si-O-Si stretching and bending vibrations from MMT [39].
Table 1 shows the shrinkage, density, porosity and BET of hydrogels with different MMT doping amounts. As can be seen from Table 1, the shrinkage of hydrogels decreases with the increase in MMT doping, along with a high porosity value of greater than 90%. In the hydrogel without MMT nanosheets, the shrinkage rate and density are high due to the lack of MMT support, indicating that the hydrogel undergoes greater pore structure collapse during the drying process. For the samples prepared with more MMT-doped amounts, the shrinkage rate decreased, and the gel skeleton structure was preserved.
The micro-morphology of the as-synthesised hydrogels was observed via SEM microscopy. As shown in Figure 3a, the CMC3-AM sample was successfully prepared to form a three-dimensional porous structure with a neat surface, and the pore size was on the micrometre scale. Figure 3b–e show microscopy images of the hydrogel samples prepared with the incorporation of MMT nanosheets. As can be seen from the figure, the uniformly sized MMT sheets are evenly distributed over the hydrogel surface, so that the CMC surface contains very rich groups, such as -OH, -NH2, -COOH, etc., contributing to an improvement in the adsorption capability of the CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel. As MMT continues to increase, CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel in Figure 3e agglomerates. Therefore, it can be seen from the SEM images that the CMC-AM-MMT3 sample possesses high MMT loading, while avoiding agglomeration.

3.2. Methylene Blue Removal Performance

3.2.1. Initial CMC and MMT Content

Figure 4a,b shows the MB adsorption capacity and removal rate of the CMC-AM-MMT hydrogels prepared with different CMC and MMT amounts. It can be seen from the figure that the adsorption capacity of the hydrogel without MMT incorporation is proportional to the amount of CMC. This is because that with the increase in CMC content, the number of carboxyl groups in the sample increases, and thus the complexation ability with MB is enhanced. When the amount of CMC further increases, although the number of carboxyl groups increases, the gel volume is limited, and its internal pores are compressed, which affects the adsorption amount and removal rate of dyes by the gel. For the samples prepared with the MMT, the adsorption capacity of hydrogel is also positively correlated with the amounts of MMT. This is because MMT acts as the skeleton structure of the hydrogel, which increases the porosity of the gel and thus improves the adsorption capacity of the gel. In addition, MMT is introduced into the hydrogel system. The cation exchange capacity of CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel is increased due to the increase in the Na+ ratio. More MB carrying a positive charge is exchanged or adsorbed to the active site of the CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel. When the amount of MMT reaches a certain extent, MMT is not evenly distributed on the hydrogel surface, resulting in agglomeration, which reduces the homogeneity of the hydrogel structure. The pores of the gel cannot continue to expand, and the adsorption capacity of MB cannot be enhanced. Therefore, when the amount of CMC is 3 g and the mass ratio of CMC to MMT is 1, the adsorption performance of CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel is optimal. Further adsorption experiments were carried out with CMC3-AM and CMC-AM-MMT3 hydrogel.

3.2.2. Dosage of Adsorbent

Figure 4c shows the effect of the dosage of the adsorbent on the adsorption effect of MB. The adsorption efficiency of CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel for MB increased from 25.24% to 95.96%, and the adsorption capacity decreased from 151.44 to 112.75, which was significantly higher than that of CMC-AM hydrogel without the MMT nanosheets when the amount of hydrogel was in the range of 0.01–0.05 g. The adsorption sites bound to MB were positively correlated with the gel dosage. However, when the adsorption of MB by the gel adsorbent reaches saturation, the increase in its dosage does not improve the adsorption efficiency. Therefore, the optimal dosage of gel adsorbent is 0.05 g.

3.2.3. The Initial Concentration of MB

Figure 4d shows the relationship between different initial MB concentrations and gel adsorption capacity. When the initial concentration of MB was in the range of 20–60 mg/L, the adsorption capacity of CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel for MB increased from 39.99 mg/g to 112.71 mg/g, and the adsorption efficiency decreased slightly from 99.98% to 93.93%, which significantly improved the adsorption effect of CMC-AM hydrogel. The amount of hydrogel adsorbed is proportional to the initial concentration of MB. However, there is an upper limit on the adsorption site of MB for hydrogel adsorbents. When the adsorption site of hydrogel is saturated, the increase in the initial concentration of MB will not affect its adsorption performance. Therefore, in order to obtain higher adsorption efficiency, the optimal initial concentration of MB is 60 mg/L.

3.2.4. pH Effect

Figure 4e illustrates the effect of pH on MB adsorption, showing that the adsorption performance of the hydrogel increases first and then decreases with the increase in pH value. When pH is set to 7, the adsorption capacity of the CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel is 112.33 mg/g, and the adsorption efficiency is 93.61%, which is significantly higher than that of CMC-AM hydrogel. This is because in an acidic environment, H+ ions are dominant in MB solution, which competes with the cationic dye methylene blue molecules for the active site of the hydrogel adsorbent, which is not conducive to the adsorption of MB by hydrogel. With the increase in pH value, the ionization of the carboxyl group in the hydrogel is beneficial, which greatly promotes the electrostatic interaction between the hydrogel and MB, and its adsorption capacity for MB is therefore enhanced. In an alkaline environment, OH in solution could affect the ionization of the carboxyl group in hydrogel, resulting in reduced adsorption capacity.

3.2.5. Adsorption Temperature

Figure 4f shows the effect of temperature on the adsorption properties of hydrogel. It can be seen from the figure that the adsorption amount of MB by hydrogel is positively correlated with temperature. The higher the temperature, the more intense the thermal movement of MB molecules, resulting in increased collision probability between MB molecules and hydrogels, and increased adsorption capacity. However, As the temperature of the solution increases, MB tends to escape from the solid phase. This also indicates that the desorption trend of MB from the boundary to the solution increases with the increase in temperature. Therefore, it is comprehensively considered that the adsorption process of MB by the composite hydrogel is carried out at 30 °C.

3.2.6. Adsorption Kinetics and Internal Particle Diffusion

The kinetic model can be used to understand the rate of the adsorbent adsorption of the solute, and to determine the speed-limiting step and optimal adsorption time in the adsorption process. In order to study the adsorption kinetics of hydrogels, 0.05 g of hydrogel sample was added to 100 mL of methylene blue solution with a concentration of 60 mg/L, and the adsorption amount of methylene blue was measured with time. As shown in Figure 5a, when the hydrogel is placed in methylene blue solution, in the initial adsorption stage, the adsorption capacity of the gel sample to methylene blue increases dramatically. In 2 h, the adsorption capacity of the complex hydrogel approaches the maximum, and then the adsorption rate of the gel gradually slows down until it reaches a stable value. This is mainly due to the micron-scale pore structure of the hydrogel, which allows MB molecules to quickly move to the interior of the hydrogel and exchange with abundant adsorption sites (-COOH, -NH2, Na+, -OH). It can be seen from Table 2 that the correlation coefficient R2 of the pseudo-first-order kinetic model and the pseudo-second-order kinetic model is very high, indicating that the composite hydrogel includes physical adsorption and chemical adsorption of MB.
Generally, it is considered that the diffusion of adsorbent in solution can be divided into three stages: from the liquid phase through the boundary layer to the surface of the adsorbent; through the pores to the interior of the particles; and the diffusion of adsorbent at the active site on the surface of the adsorbent. The rate control problem in the reaction was analysed using the Weber and Morris model, which was used to solve the rate constant of hydrogel diffusion. In Figure 5b and Table 3, the fitting results of the Weber and Morris model show that R2 values are high, and KW&M1 > KW&M2 > KW&M3. The whole adsorption process is mainly composed of three linear parts, indicating that three steps are involved in the adsorption process of MB by CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel. The first stage is the process of MB diffusion from the liquid phase to the hydrogel surface, and the rate is affected by the diffusion rate of MB on the surface. In the second stage, the slope of the fitted line is greatly reduced, which indicates the process of MB diffusion inside the hydrogel particles. The gentler curve in the third stage is caused by the diffusion of MB inside the pore where the adsorbent is smaller.

3.2.7. Adsorption Isotherm

Adsorption isotherm is a model to study the relationship between the adsorption amount of organic pollutants and the concentration of pollutants in solution adsorption materials in a state of equilibrium. For the isothermal adsorption equation of CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel, Langmuir and Freundlich, two typical isothermal adsorption models, were selected to fit and analyse the experimental data. It can be seen from Figure 5c that with the increase in the initial concentration of MB, the adsorption capacity of CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel for dyes shows a trend of increasing and gradually slowing down. This is due to the increase in MB concentration, the increase in the number of dye molecules, and more effective contact with the adsorption site on the CMC surface. The probability of MB colliding with -COOH, -NH2, -OH and Na+ is also greatly increased, and the concentration of MB in the solution is reduced. The speed of adsorption and desorption is increased. However, the adsorption sites on the surface of CMC are limited, and the adsorption of dyes gradually slows down when most of the adsorption sites are occupied. The equilibrium concentration of MB in the solution also moves in a higher direction. Table 4 demonstrates that the correlation coefficient R2 of the Freundlich isothermal adsorption equation is 0.9676, which is much greater than the correlation coefficient of the Langmuir isothermal adsorption equation. These results support that the adsorption process of MB by composite hydrogels is carried out according to a multilayer adsorption mechanism.

3.2.8. Thermodynamic Parameters

The adsorption thermodynamics of MB by hydrogel at an adsorption temperature of 2 °C to 50 °C were studied. In Figure 5d and Table 5, Δ G is shown to be negative at all temperatures, which indicates that the adsorption process of MB on the hydrogel is spontaneous. The positive value of Δ H indicates that the adsorption process is endothermic. The adsorption capacity of MB increased with the increase in temperature. In general, the Δ H value of physical adsorption is between 2.1 and 20.9, and the Δ H value of chemical adsorption is between 80 and 200 kJ·mol−1 [55]. The Δ H value of MB adsorption on hydrogel is neither in the range of physical adsorption nor chemisorption, indicating that the adsorption of MB by hydrogel also involves other adsorption processes, such as electrostatic interaction. The Δ S value of the adsorption of cations by hydrogel is positive, indicating that the degree of disorder and randomness of the solid–solution interface increase after adsorption. The thermodynamic calculation results show that the hydrogel prepared under the present experimental conditions can be used as the adsorbent of MB, and can effectively remove MB from aqueous solution at ambient temperature.

3.3. Cr6+ Ions Removal Performance

3.3.1. Initial CMC and MMT Content

Figure 6a,b shows the effects of CMC-AM-MMT hydrogels prepared with different CMC and MMT addition amounts on the adsorption capacity and removal rate of Cr6+. It can be seen from the figure that when MMT is not added and the amount of AM is constant, the adsorption capacity of hydrogel is proportional to the amount of CMC added. This is due to the increase in CMC content, and the carboxyl group inside the gel chelates with Cr6+. When the amount of CMC increases to a certain extent, although the number of carboxyl groups increases, the gel volume is limited, and its internal pores are compressed, which affects the adsorption amount and removal rate of Cr6+ by the gel. When the amount of MMT and AM is constant, the adsorption capacity of hydrogel is also positively correlated with the amount of MMT. This is because MMT acts as the skeleton structure of the hydrogel, which increases the porosity of the gel and thus improves the adsorption capacity of the gel. When the amount of MMT reaches a certain extent, the pores of the gel cannot continue to expand, and the adsorption capacity of Cr6+ cannot be enhanced. Therefore, when the amount of CMC is 3 g and the amount of CMC:MMT is 1:1, the adsorption performance of CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel is better. Further adsorption experiments were carried out with CMC3-AM and CMC-AM-MMT3 hydrogel.

3.3.2. Dosage of Adsorbent

Figure 6c shows the influence of the dosage of hydrogel adsorbent on the adsorption effect of Cr6+. When the amount of hydrogel is in the range of 0.1–0.5 g, the adsorption efficiency of CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel for Cr6+ increases from 31.69% to 67.45%, and the adsorption capacity decreases from 3.17 to 1.35, which shows a great improvement compared with the adsorption effect of CMC-AM hydrogel. This is because the amount of hydrogel adsorbents continues to increase, and the active site is able to bind to Cr6+, so the adsorption efficiency increases. When the adsorption of Cr6+ by the adsorbent reaches saturation, the increase in its dosage does not improve the adsorption efficiency. Therefore, the optimal dosage of gel adsorbent is 0.5 g.

3.3.3. Initial Concentration of Cr6+

Figure 6d shows the relationship between different initial Cr6+ concentrations and gel adsorption effect. When the initial concentration of Cr6+ is in the range of 5–10 mg/L, the adsorption capacity of Cr6+ by CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel increases from 0.69 mg/g to 1.33 mg/g, and the adsorption efficiency decreases from 69.02% to 66.66%, which is significantly higher than the adsorption effect of CMC-AM hydrogel. The amount of hydrogel adsorbed is proportional to the initial concentration of Cr6+. However, there is an upper limit on the adsorption site of Cr6+ for hydrogel adsorbents. When the adsorption site of hydrogel is saturated, the initial concentration of Cr6+ does not increase the adsorption efficiency of hydrogel. Therefore, in order to obtain higher adsorption efficiency, the optimal initial concentration of Cr6+ is 10 mg/L.

3.3.4. pH Effect

Figure 6e shows the influence of different pH values on the adsorption effect of Cr6+. As can be seen from the figure, as the pH increases from 1 to 7, the adsorption capacity of hydrogel increases from 0.24 mg/g to 1.34 mg/g, and the adsorption efficiency increases from 12.44% to 67.05, which is significantly higher than that of CMC-AM hydrogel. This is due to the large amount of H+ and H3O+ in the Cr6+ solution competing with Cr6+ as the active site of the hydrogel adsorbent in the acidic environment. With the increase in pH, the concentration of H+ decreased, which was conducive to the adsorption of hydrogel. In an alkaline environment, the OH in the solution will combine with Cr6+ to form a precipitate. Therefore, when the pH is 7, the gel has the best adsorption effect on Cr6+.

3.3.5. Adsorption Temperature

Figure 6f shows the effect of temperature on the adsorption properties of hydrogel. It can be seen from the figure that the adsorption amount of Cr6+ by hydrogel is positively correlated with temperature. The higher the temperature, the stronger the thermal motion of Cr6+, the greater the probability of collision with hydrogel, and the greater the adsorption capacity. With the increase in temperature, the solubility of the adsorbent increases, which makes the interaction between adsorbent and solvent stronger than the interaction between adsorbent and adsorbate. The curve flattens out. Therefore, the adsorption process of Cr6+ by hydrogel is most favourable at 30 °C.

3.3.6. Adsorption Kinetics and Internal Particle Diffusion

In order to study the adsorption kinetics of hydrogels on Cr6+, 0.5 g of the hydrogel samples was added to 100 mL of Cr6+ solution with a concentration of 10 mg/L. The adsorption amount of Cr6+ was identified. The rapid adsorption rate of hydrogels at the initial stage of adsorption is related to the tightly connected porous three-dimensional network structure and ion exchange adsorption of hydrogel. When the adsorption site is occupied by Cr6+ molecules, the surface transport capacity of the pore is blocked, and the adsorption reaches an equilibrium state. It can be seen from Table 6 that the correlation coefficient R2 of the pseudo-first-order kinetic model is high, indicating that physical adsorption takes place for the composite hydrogel when removing Cr6+ ions.
The internal diffusion model is usually used to study the transfer process and chemical reaction mechanism in adsorption. As shown in Figure 7b and Table 7, the Weber and Morris model has a high degree of fitting. Because KW&M1 > KW&M2 > KW&M3, the fitting curve of the internal diffusion of the particle can be divided into three linear parts, indicating that the adsorption process consists of three stages. The first stage is the diffusion of Cr6+ from the solution to the surface of the hydrogel. In the second stage, Cr6+ passes through the boundary layer of the hydrogel and reacts with the adsorption sites in the hydrogel, which belong to the internal diffusion of particles. In the third stage, the particles reach the micropores and react further with the adsorption sites in the hydrogel. Since the fitting curves of these three stages do not pass through the origin of coordinate axes, this indicates that the adsorption process is controlled by boundary layer diffusion and internal diffusion.

3.3.7. Adsorption Isotherm

Two isothermal adsorption models of Langmuir and Freundlich were applied to fit and analyse the experimental data for Cr6+ ion adsorption. It can be seen from Figure 7c that with the increase in the initial concentration of Cr6+, the adsorption capacity of CMC for dyes shows a trend of increasing and then gradually slowing down. The adsorption process mainly relies on the exchange of -COOH, -NH2, -OH and Na+ on the CMC surface. From Table 8, it can be seen that the correlation coefficient R2 of the Freundlich isothermal adsorption equation is 0.9913, which is slightly greater than the correlation coefficient of Langmuir isothermal adsorption model, which shows that the adsorption process of Cr6+ by the composite hydrogel is performed predominantly through a multilayer adsorption mechanism.

3.3.8. Thermodynamic Parameters

The adsorption thermodynamics of Cr6+ on hydrogel were studied at 20 °C to 50 °C, and the obtained thermodynamic parameters of Cr6+ adsorption on hydrogel are shown in Figure 7d and Table 9. The positive value of Δ S indicates that the randomness of the solid solution interface increases irregularly during the adsorption of Cr6+ on the hydrogel. Δ G is negative at all temperatures, indicating the feasibility of Cr6+ adsorption on hydrogel and the spontaneity of the adsorption process. The Δ H value of Cr6+ adsorbed on hydrogel is very low, which indicates that the influence of temperature on the adsorption of Cr6+ is negligible. On the other hand, it shows that the adsorption process is a physical adsorption process, which is consistent with the results of adsorption kinetics. This confirmed that the adsorption mechanism of Cr6+ on hydrogel includes the existence of weak interaction between the hydrogel surface groups and Cr6+ surface.

4. Conclusions

A novel type of cellulose-based hydrogel material is fabricated as an adsorbent for contaminant removal in wastewater via chain radical polymerization and a freeze-drying process. The incorporation of MMT nanosheets can significantly enhance the organic dye and metal ion adsorption of hydrogel, benefiting from the rigid support of the hydrogel skeleton and providing an active adsorption site for containment removal. The optimal mass ratio of CMC to MMT for the adsorption performance of the hydrogel is verified to be 1:1. The optimal adsorption conditions of CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel for MB are as follows: an initial concentration of MB 60 mg/L, pH 7, a adsorbent dosage of 0.5 g/L, an adsorption temperature of 30 °C, and an adsorption capacity of 112.9 mg/g. The optimal adsorption conditions of CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel for Cr6+ are as follows: an initial concentration of Cr6+ 10 mg/L, pH 7, an adsorbent dosage of 5 g/L, and an adsorption capacity of 1.35 mg/g. The fitting results of the isothermal models, the kinetic models, internal particle diffusion models and thermodynamics of the experimental data of the adsorbate adsorption process show that the adsorption of MB by hydrogel is a spontaneous segmented process of multi-layer physical and chemical adsorption. Additionally, the adsorption of Cr6+ ions by hydrogel is a spontaneous segmented process of multi-layer physical adsorption. The CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel has the advantages of simple preparation, non-toxicity, low cost, good biocompatibility, and environmental friendliness. However, the removal effect of CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel on heavy metal ions is not very satisfactory. Hydrogels with multiple adsorption functions and deeper mechanisms of hydrogel adsorption are being explored, and further facile modification approaches for improving the adsorption performance of cellulose-based materials should be developed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.Z., L.W. and T.J.; Methodology, Y.X. and T.J.; Software, Y.X. and S.Z.; Validation, Y.X., S.Z., Q.D. and Y.H.; Formal analysis, Y.X., S.Z. and Y.H.; Investigation, Y.X. and K.W.; Resources, T.J.; Data curation, Y.X. and T.J.; Writing—original draft, Y.X., S.Z., Q.D. and Y.H.; Writing—review & editing, Y.X., S.Z. and T.J.; Supervision, L.W. and T.J.; Project administration, T.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX23_1485).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zamora-Ledezma, C.; Negrete-Bolagay, D.; Figueroa, F.; Zamora-Ledezma, E.; Ni, M.; Alexis, F.; Guerrero, V.H. Heavy metal water pollution: A fresh look about hazards, novel and conventional remediation methods. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 22, 101504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Patel, Y.N.; Patel, M.P. Adsorption of azo dyes from water by new poly (3-acrylamidopropyl)-trimethylammonium chloride-co-N,N-dimethylacrylamide superabsorbent hydrogel—Equilibrium and kinetic studies. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2013, 1, 1368–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhao, C.; Liu, G.; Tan, Q.; Gao, M.; Chen, G.; Huang, X.; Xu, X.; Li, L.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Polysaccharide-based biopolymer hydrogels for heavy metal detection and adsorption. J. Adv. Res. 2023, 44, 53–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wu, J.; Dong, Z.; Li, X.; Li, P.; Wei, J.; Hu, M.; Geng, L.; Peng, X. Constructing acid-resistant chitosan/cellulose nanofibrils composite membrane for the adsorption of methylene blue. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. El-Ghobashy, M.A.; Salem, I.A.; El-Dahrawy, W.M.; Salem, M.A. Fabrication of α-MnO2/Fe-Mn binary oxide nanocomposite as an efficient adsorbent for the removal of methylene blue from wastewater. J. Mol. Struct. 2023, 1272, 134118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yan, H.; Lai, C.; Wang, D.; Liu, S.; Li, X.; Zhou, X.; Yi, H.; Li, B.; Zhang, M.; Li, L.; et al. In situ chemical oxidation: Peroxide or persulfate coupled with membrane technology for wastewater treatment. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 11944–11960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Domingues, E.; Silva, M.J.; Vaz, T.; Gomes, J.; Martins, R.C. Sulfate radical based advanced oxidation processes for agro-industrial effluents treatment: A comparative review with Fenton’s peroxidation. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 832, 155029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chaturvedi, A.; Rai, B.N.; Singh, R.S.; Jaiswal, R.P. A comprehensive review on the integration of advanced oxidation processes with biodegradation for the treatment of textile wastewater containing azo dyes. Rev. Chem. Eng. 2022, 38, 617–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wolski, E.A.; González, J.F.; Orozco, A.M.F.; Durruty, I.; Ceretta, M.B. Biodegradation of textile wastewater: Enhancement of biodegradability via the addition of co-substrates followed by phytotoxicity analysis of the effluent. Water Sci. Technol. 2018, 2017, 516–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rashid, R.; Shafiq, I.; Akhter, P.; Iqbal, M.J.; Hussain, M. A state-of-the-art review on wastewater treatment techniques: The effectiveness of adsorption method. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 9050–9066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Khani, M.H.; Khamseh, A.G. Statistical analysis, equilibrium and dynamic study on the biosorption of strontium ions on Chlorella vulgaris. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2023, 332, 3325–3334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Khamseh, A.A.G.; Ghorbanian, S.A.; Amini, Y.; Shadman, M.M. Investigation of kinetic, isotherm and adsorption efficacy of thorium by orange peel immobilized on calcium alginate. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 8393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kavitha, E.; Poonguzhali, E.; Nanditha, D.; Kapoor, A.; Arthanareeswaran, G.; Prabhakar, S. Current status and future prospects of membrane separation processes for value recovery from wastewater. Chemosphere 2022, 291, 132690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, J.; Yu, H.; Quan, X.; Chen, S.; Zhang, Y. Ceramic membrane separation coupled with catalytic ozonation for tertiary treatment of dyestuff wastewater in a pilot-scale study. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 301, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, C.; Zhou, J.; Yan, Y.; Yang, L.; Xing, G.; Li, H.; Wu, P.; Wang, M.; Zheng, H. Application of coagulation/flocculation in oily wastewater treatment: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 765, 142795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhang, Z. The flocculation mechanism and treatment of oily wastewater by flocculation. Water Sci. Technol. 2017, 76, 2630–2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Benalia, M.C.; Youcef, L.; Bouaziz, M.G.; Achour, S.; Menasra, H. Removal of Heavy Metals from Industrial Wastewater by Chemical Precipitation: Mechanisms and Sludge Characterization. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2021, 47, 5587–5599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Irawan, C.; Kuo, Y.-L.; Liu, J.C. Treatment of boron-containing optoelectronic wastewater by precipitation process. Desalination 2011, 280, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, W.; Ma, G.; Sun, Y.; Liu, Y.; Song, N.; Xu, Y.; Zheng, H. Effective treatment of high phosphorus pharmaceutical wastewater by chemical precipitation. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2017, 95, 1585–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Raghu, S.; Ahmed Basha, C. Chemical or electrochemical techniques, followed by ion exchange, for recycle of textile dye wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 149, 324–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Babiak, P.; Schaffer-Harris, G.; Kainuma, M.; Fedorovich, V.; Goryanin, I. Development of a New Hydrogel Anion Exchange Membrane for Swine Wastewater Treatment. Membranes 2022, 12, 984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chen, D.; Li, Y.; Zhong, X.; Zeng, H.; Chen, Z.; Tang, Z.; Cen, C. Preparation of Novel MOF with Multipolar Pore and Adsorption Properties of VOCs. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 300, 032008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Deng, H.; Pan, T.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Wu, Q.; Ma, J.; Shan, W.; He, H. Adsorptive removal of toluene and dichloromethane from humid exhaust on MFI, BEA and FAU zeolites: An experimental and theoretical study. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 394, 124986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Aljerf, L. High-efficiency extraction of bromocresol purple dye and heavy metals as chromium from industrial effluent by adsorption onto a modified surface of zeolite: Kinetics and equilibrium study. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 225, 120–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yin, Y.; Shi, M.; Ren, Y.; Wang, S.; Hua, M.; Lu, J.; Zhang, W.; Lv, L. Wrinkle structure on multifunctional MOFs to facilitate PPCPs adsorption in wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 387, 124196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Abd El Salam, H.M. Bio-Sustainable Alternatives Synthesis of Nanoporous Activated Carbon @Al-MOF for the Adsorption of Hazardous Organic Dyes from Wastewater. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2023, 234, 567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Karmakar, S.; Roy, D.; De, S. Multicomponent transport model-based scaling up of long-term adsorptive filtration of MOF incorporated mixed matrix hollow fiber membrane: Treatment of textile effluent. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 403, 125103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wichterle, O.; Lím, D. Hydrophilic Gels for Biological Use. Nature 1960, 185, 117–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, Y.; Wang, T.; Liu, J.; Huang, J.; Zhou, G.; Hu, S. Synthesis of microgel-reinforced double network hydrogel adsorbent and its adsorption on heavy metals. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2023, 98, 1260–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhen-Tao, Q.I.; Fang, H.E. Synthesis of novel MTF aerogels with adsorption performance. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2019, 94, 582–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Huang, T.; Dai, J.; Yang, J.-h.; Zhang, N.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Z.-w. Polydopamine coated graphene oxide aerogels and their ultrahigh adsorption ability. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2018, 86, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ruan, C.; Chen, G.; Ma, Y.; Du, C.; He, C.; Liu, X.; Jin, X.; Chen, Q.; He, S.; Huang, Y. PVA-assisted CNCs/SiO2 composite aerogel for efficient sorption of ciprofloxacin. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2023, 630, 544–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mousavi, S.; Deuber, F.; Petrozzi, S.; Federer, L.; Aliabadi, M.; Shahraki, F.; Adlhart, C. Efficient dye adsorption by highly porous nanofiber aerogels. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2018, 547, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Van Tran, V.; Park, D.; Lee, Y.-C. Hydrogel applications for adsorption of contaminants in water and wastewater treatment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 24569–24599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yu, F.; Yang, P.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Ma, J. Double-network hydrogel adsorbents for environmental applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 426, 131900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, J.; Zhao, K.; Liu, L.; Gao, Y.; Zheng, L.; Liu, M. Modified kaolin hydrogel for Cu2+ adsorption. e-Polymers 2022, 22, 986–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Abdelwahab, H.; Hassan, S.; Mostafa, M.; El Sadek, M. Synthesis and Characterization of Glutamic-Chitosan Hydrogel for Copper and Nickel Removal from Wastewater. Molecules 2016, 21, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fekete, T.; Borsa, J.; Takács, E.; Wojnárovits, L. Synthesis of carboxymethylcellulose/starch superabsorbent hydrogels by gamma-irradiation. Chem. Cent. J. 2017, 11, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Özkahraman, B.; Acar, I.; Emik, S. Removal of Cu2+and Pb2+Ions Using CMC Based Thermoresponsive Nanocomposite Hydrogel. CLEAN—Soil. Air Water 2011, 39, 658–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, N.; Bora, M.; Hao, S.; Tao, K.; Wu, J.; Hu, L.; Liao, J.; Lin, S.; Triantafyllou, M.S.; Li, X. Hyaluronic Acid Methacrylate Hydrogel-Modified Electrochemical Device for Adsorptive Removal of Lead(II). Biosensors 2022, 12, 714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, Y.-H.; Liu, C.-S.; Tian, Y.; Wang, J.; Xin, S.; Sheng, X. An eco-friendly photo-responsive hyaluronic acid-based supramolecular polysaccharide hybrid hydrogels for plant growth regulation and heavy metal ions adsorption. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 242, 125194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Guilherme, M.R.; Reis, A.V.; Paulino, A.T.; Moia, T.A.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; Tambourgi, E.B. Pectin-based polymer hydrogel as a carrier for release of agricultural nutrients and removal of heavy metals from wastewater. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 117, 3146–3154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bhattarai, N.; Gunn, J.; Zhang, M. Chitosan-based hydrogels for controlled, localized drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2010, 62, 83–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Li, D.; Li, Q.; Bai, N.; Dong, H.; Mao, D. One-Step Synthesis of Cationic Hydrogel for Efficient Dye Adsorption and Its Second Use for Emulsified Oil Separation. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 5598–5607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, H.; Rong, L.; Wang, B.; Xie, R.; Sui, X.; Xu, H.; Zhang, L.; Zhong, Y.; Mao, Z. Facile fabrication of redox/pH dual stimuli responsive cellulose hydrogel. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 176, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Abu-Saied, M.A.; Wycisk, R.; Abbassy, M.M.; El-Naim, G.A.; El-Demerdash, F.; Youssef, M.E.; Bassuony, H.; Pintauro, P.N. Sulfated chitosan/PVA absorbent membrane for removal of copper and nickel ions from aqueous solutions—Fabrication and sorption studies. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 165, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Godiya, C.B.; Cheng, X.; Li, D.; Chen, Z.; Lu, X. Carboxymethyl cellulose/polyacrylamide composite hydrogel for cascaded treatment/reuse of heavy metal ions in wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 364, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, Y.; Long, Y.; Li, Q.; Chen, X.; Xu, X. Synthesis of high-performance sodium carboxymethyl cellulose-based adsorbent for effective removal of methylene blue and Pb (II). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 126, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Stevens, L.; Williams, K.; Han, W.Y.; Drage, T.; Snape, C.; Wood, J.; Wang, J. Preparation and CO2 adsorption of diamine modified montmorillonite via exfoliation grafting route. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 215–216, 699–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, T.; Yuan, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Rao, F.; Song, S. Preparation of Montmorillonite Nanosheets through Freezing/Thawing and Ultrasonic Exfoliation. Langmuir 2019, 35, 2368–2374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Feng, Q.; Chen, X.; Zhao, Y.-q.; Hu, S.-s.; Xia, Z.-w.; Yan, Q.-Z. Preparation of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)/montmorillonite composite hydrogel by frontal polymerization. Colloid. Polym. Sci. 2017, 295, 883–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nie, X.; Adalati, A.; Du, J.; Liu, H.; Xu, S.; Wang, J. Preparation of amphoteric nanocomposite hydrogels based on exfoliation of montmorillonite via in-situ intercalative polymerization of hydrophilic cationic and anionic monomers. Appl. Clay Sci. 2014, 97–98, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Irani, M.; Ismail, H.; Ahmad, Z. Preparation and properties of linear low-density polyethylene-g-poly (acrylic acid)/organo-montmorillonite superabsorbent hydrogel composites. Polym. Test. 2013, 32, 502–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, J.; Guo, X. Adsorption kinetic models: Physical meanings, applications, and solving methods. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 390, 122156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lin, J.; Zhan, Y. Adsorption of humic acid from aqueous solution onto unmodified and surfactant-modified chitosan/zeolite composites. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 200–202, 202–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tran, H.N.; You, S.-J.; Chao, H.-P. Thermodynamic parameters of cadmium adsorption onto orange peel calculated from various methods: A comparison study. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 2671–2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jeong, D.; Kim, C.; Kim, Y.; Jung, S. Dual crosslinked carboxymethyl cellulose/polyacrylamide interpenetrating hydrogels with highly enhanced mechanical strength and superabsorbent properties. Eur. Polym. J. 2020, 127, 109586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, W.; Ni, J.; Chen, L.; Ai, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Song, S. Synthesis of carboxymethyl cellulose-chitosan-montmorillonite nanosheets composite hydrogel for dye effluent remediation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 165, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kenawy, E.R.; Azaam, M.M.; El-nshar, E.M. Preparation of carboxymethyl cellulose-g-poly (acrylamide)/montmorillonite superabsorbent composite as a slow-release urea fertilizer. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2018, 29, 2072–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Preparation process of CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel; (b) CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel interpenetrating polymer network mechanism.
Figure 1. (a) Preparation process of CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel; (b) CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel interpenetrating polymer network mechanism.
Separations 10 00582 g001
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of the CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel, MMT, AM, and CMC samples.
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of the CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel, MMT, AM, and CMC samples.
Separations 10 00582 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of (a) CMC3-AM, (b) CMC-AM-MMT1, (c) CMC-AM-MMT2, (d) CMC-AM-MMT3, and (e) CMC-AM-MMT4 hydrogel.
Figure 3. SEM images of (a) CMC3-AM, (b) CMC-AM-MMT1, (c) CMC-AM-MMT2, (d) CMC-AM-MMT3, and (e) CMC-AM-MMT4 hydrogel.
Separations 10 00582 g003
Figure 4. Effect of (a) CMC and (b) MMT components on the adsorption of hydrogel; (c) effect of adsorbent addition amount on adsorption effect of hydrogel; (d) effect of initial concentration of MB on adsorption effect of hydrogel; (e) effect of PH on adsorption of hydrogel; (f) effect of adsorption temperature on adsorption effect of hydrogel.
Figure 4. Effect of (a) CMC and (b) MMT components on the adsorption of hydrogel; (c) effect of adsorbent addition amount on adsorption effect of hydrogel; (d) effect of initial concentration of MB on adsorption effect of hydrogel; (e) effect of PH on adsorption of hydrogel; (f) effect of adsorption temperature on adsorption effect of hydrogel.
Separations 10 00582 g004
Figure 5. (a) Adsorption kinetics and (b) intraparticle diffusion model of MB removal onto CMC3-AM and CMC-AM-MMT3 hydrogel; (c) Isotherm of MB removal onto CMC-AM-MMT3 hydrogel; (d) Figure of ln Ko vs. 1/T of MB removal onto CMC-AM-MMT3 hydrogel.
Figure 5. (a) Adsorption kinetics and (b) intraparticle diffusion model of MB removal onto CMC3-AM and CMC-AM-MMT3 hydrogel; (c) Isotherm of MB removal onto CMC-AM-MMT3 hydrogel; (d) Figure of ln Ko vs. 1/T of MB removal onto CMC-AM-MMT3 hydrogel.
Separations 10 00582 g005
Figure 6. Effect of (a) CMC and (b) MMT components on the adsorption of hydrogel; (c) Effect of adsorbent addition amount on adsorption effect of hydrogel; (d) Effect of initial concentration of Cr6+ on adsorption effect of hydrogel; (e)Effect of PH on adsorption of hydrogel; (f) Effect of adsorption temperature on adsorption effect of hydrogel.
Figure 6. Effect of (a) CMC and (b) MMT components on the adsorption of hydrogel; (c) Effect of adsorbent addition amount on adsorption effect of hydrogel; (d) Effect of initial concentration of Cr6+ on adsorption effect of hydrogel; (e)Effect of PH on adsorption of hydrogel; (f) Effect of adsorption temperature on adsorption effect of hydrogel.
Separations 10 00582 g006
Figure 7. (a) Adsorption kinetics and (b) intraparticle diffusion model of Cr6+ removal onto CMC3-AM and CMC-AM-MMT3 hydrogel; (c) isotherm of Cr6+ removal onto CMC-AM-MMT3 hydrogel; (d) figure of ln Ko vs. 1/T of Cr6+ removal onto CMC-AM-MMT3 hydrogel.
Figure 7. (a) Adsorption kinetics and (b) intraparticle diffusion model of Cr6+ removal onto CMC3-AM and CMC-AM-MMT3 hydrogel; (c) isotherm of Cr6+ removal onto CMC-AM-MMT3 hydrogel; (d) figure of ln Ko vs. 1/T of Cr6+ removal onto CMC-AM-MMT3 hydrogel.
Separations 10 00582 g007
Table 1. Shrinkage, density, and BET of CMC-AM-MMT hydrogels with different MMT-doped amounts.
Table 1. Shrinkage, density, and BET of CMC-AM-MMT hydrogels with different MMT-doped amounts.
CMC:MMTShrinkageDensity (ρ)
g/cm3
BET
m2/g
Porosity (φ)
3:026.32%0.08121.2193.55%
3:117.54%0.07851.2693.53%
3:212.42%0.08462.5493.25%
3:38.33%0.08813.0893.17%
3:47.95%0.08962.4492.95%
Table 2. The parameters of two kinetic models for the adsorption of MB by hydrogels with different MMT contents.
Table 2. The parameters of two kinetic models for the adsorption of MB by hydrogels with different MMT contents.
Initial
Concentration
CMC:MMTPseudo-First-OrderPseudo-Second-Order
QeK1R2QeK2R2
mg/gmin−1 mg/gmin−1
60 mg/L3:084.530.07420.999386.110.00320.9406
3:3112.130.07510.9998114.020.00260.9882
Table 3. The parameters of intraparticle diffusion model for the adsorption of MB by hydrogels with different MMT content.
Table 3. The parameters of intraparticle diffusion model for the adsorption of MB by hydrogels with different MMT content.
Initial
Concentration
CMC:MMTKW&M1CR2KW&M2CR2KW&M3CR2
mg/(g·min)mg/g mg/(g·min)mg/g mg/(g·min)mg/g
60 mg/L3:01.95265.8060.89650.20681.5710.9660.04684.2010.958
3:32.78986.3960.83660.190109.2250.9510.064111.3670.942
Table 4. The parameters of the Langmuir model and Freundlich model for the adsorption of MB by CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel.
Table 4. The parameters of the Langmuir model and Freundlich model for the adsorption of MB by CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel.
CMC:MMTTemperature (K)LangmuirFreundlich
QeKLR2KFnR2
mg/gL/mg mg/g
3:3303173.730.07140.87986.40234.94430.9676
Table 5. Thermodynamic parameters for the adsorption of MB by CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel.
Table 5. Thermodynamic parameters for the adsorption of MB by CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel.
Thermodynamic Constant Temperature (K)
293303313323
Ko91.35228.60315.21373.75
Δ G (×1000 kJ mol−1)−10.99−13.68−14.97−15.90
Δ H (×1000 kJ mol−1)36.1436.1436.1436.14
Δ S (J mol−1 K−1)162.44162.44162.44162.44
Table 6. The parameters of two kinetic models for the adsorption of Cr6+ by hydrogel with different MMT contents.
Table 6. The parameters of two kinetic models for the adsorption of Cr6+ by hydrogel with different MMT contents.
Initial
Concentration
CMC:MMTPseudo-First-OrderPseudo-Secondary
QeK1R2QeK2R2
mg/gmin−1 mg/gmin−1
10 mg/L3:00.950.04850.99720.990.11240.9313
3:31.310.00550.97161.390.04230.9408
Table 7. The parameters of the intraparticle diffusion model for the adsorption of Cr6+ by hydrogels with different MMT contents.
Table 7. The parameters of the intraparticle diffusion model for the adsorption of Cr6+ by hydrogels with different MMT contents.
Initial
Concentration
CMC:MMTKW&M1CR2KW&M2CR2KW&M3CR2
mg/(g·min)mg/g mg/(g·min)mg/g mg/(g·min)mg/g
10 mg/L3:00.04380.5150.96050.01450.8620.97380.00610.9630.9526
3:30.05120.6500.91410.02370.9470.93290.00111.3200.8922
Table 8. The parameters of the Langmuir model and Freundlich model for the adsorption of Cr6+ by CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel.
Table 8. The parameters of the Langmuir model and Freundlich model for the adsorption of Cr6+ by CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel.
CMC:MMTTemperature (K)LangmuirFreundlich
QeKLR2KFnR2
mg/gL/mg mg/g
3:330310.950.03180.95640.731.77710.9931
Table 9. Thermodynamic parameters for the adsorption of Cr6+ by CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel.
Table 9. Thermodynamic parameters for the adsorption of Cr6+ by CMC-AM-MMT hydrogel.
Thermodynamic Constant Temperature (K)
293303313323
Ko1.591.651.691.72
Δ G (×1000 kJ mol−1)−1.14−1.26−1.36−1.46
Δ H (×1000 kJ mol−1)1.981.981.981.98
Δ S (J mol−1 K−1)10.7010.7010.7010.70
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xue, Y.; Zhong, S.; Wang, K.; Dong, Q.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, R.; Wang, L.; Jiang, T. Synthesis of Carboxymethylcellulose–Acrylamide–Montmorillonite Composite Hydrogels for Wastewater Purification. Separations 2023, 10, 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10120582

AMA Style

Xue Y, Zhong S, Wang K, Dong Q, Huang Y, Zhang R, Wang L, Jiang T. Synthesis of Carboxymethylcellulose–Acrylamide–Montmorillonite Composite Hydrogels for Wastewater Purification. Separations. 2023; 10(12):582. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10120582

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xue, Yuxuan, Sai Zhong, Kuanwen Wang, Qianrui Dong, Yue Huang, Rui Zhang, Lei Wang, and Tengyao Jiang. 2023. "Synthesis of Carboxymethylcellulose–Acrylamide–Montmorillonite Composite Hydrogels for Wastewater Purification" Separations 10, no. 12: 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10120582

APA Style

Xue, Y., Zhong, S., Wang, K., Dong, Q., Huang, Y., Zhang, R., Wang, L., & Jiang, T. (2023). Synthesis of Carboxymethylcellulose–Acrylamide–Montmorillonite Composite Hydrogels for Wastewater Purification. Separations, 10(12), 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10120582

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop