Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Role of Sleep and Physical Activity in Academic Stress, Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Dropout Intention Among Italian University Students
Previous Article in Journal
Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Systematic Review

Neuroscientific Framework of Cognitive–Behavioral Interventions for Mental Health Across Diverse Cultural Populations: A Systematic Review of Effectiveness, Delivery Methods, and Engagement

by
Evgenia Gkintoni
1,2,* and
Georgios Nikolaou
2
1
Department of Psychiatry, University General Hospital of Patras, 265 04 Patras, Greece
2
Department of Educational Sciences and Social Work, University of Patras, 265 04 Patras, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2026, 16(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe16010002
Submission received: 25 September 2025 / Revised: 30 November 2025 / Accepted: 5 December 2025 / Published: 22 December 2025

Abstract

(1) Background: Mental health disparities persist across culturally diverse populations despite robust cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT) efficacy evidence. Cultural neuroscience suggests that neurobiological processes underlying therapeutic mechanisms may exhibit culturally variable patterns, yet integration of neuroscientific frameworks into culturally adapted interventions remains limited. (2) Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science (January 2014–December 2024) for peer-reviewed studies examining CBT interventions targeting depression, anxiety, PTSD, or psychological distress in culturally diverse populations. Ninety-four studies were synthesized using narrative methods; methodological heterogeneity precluded meta-analytic pooling. (3) Results: Culturally adapted CBT interventions consistently demonstrated superior outcomes compared to standard protocols across diverse populations. Group formats showed exceptional retention in collectivistic cultures, while hybrid technology-enhanced models achieved strong completion rates across contexts. Cultural adaptation enhanced engagement (e.g., 84% vs. 52% retention in refugee populations) and maintenance of treatment gains. Individual studies reported effect sizes ranging from d = 0.29 to d = 2.4; substantial within-group variability was observed, and identified patterns likely reflect learned cultural adaptations rather than inherent biological differences. Direct neuroimaging evidence within included studies remained limited (13.8%). (4) Conclusions: The evidence supports culturally adapted interventions as essential for equitable mental health outcomes. Cultural experiences may influence therapeutic processes, suggesting potential benefit from considering culturally variable processing patterns alongside universal mechanisms. However, conclusions regarding specific neural pathways remain preliminary, and individual assessment remains paramount, with cultural background representing one factor among many in treatment planning.
Keywords: cultural adaptation; neuroscientific framework; cognitive–behavioral interventions; cultural neuroscience; mental health disparities; precision medicine; neuroplasticity; treatment engagement; diverse populations cultural adaptation; neuroscientific framework; cognitive–behavioral interventions; cultural neuroscience; mental health disparities; precision medicine; neuroplasticity; treatment engagement; diverse populations

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gkintoni, E.; Nikolaou, G. Neuroscientific Framework of Cognitive–Behavioral Interventions for Mental Health Across Diverse Cultural Populations: A Systematic Review of Effectiveness, Delivery Methods, and Engagement. Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2026, 16, 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe16010002

AMA Style

Gkintoni E, Nikolaou G. Neuroscientific Framework of Cognitive–Behavioral Interventions for Mental Health Across Diverse Cultural Populations: A Systematic Review of Effectiveness, Delivery Methods, and Engagement. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education. 2026; 16(1):2. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe16010002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gkintoni, Evgenia, and Georgios Nikolaou. 2026. "Neuroscientific Framework of Cognitive–Behavioral Interventions for Mental Health Across Diverse Cultural Populations: A Systematic Review of Effectiveness, Delivery Methods, and Engagement" European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education 16, no. 1: 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe16010002

APA Style

Gkintoni, E., & Nikolaou, G. (2026). Neuroscientific Framework of Cognitive–Behavioral Interventions for Mental Health Across Diverse Cultural Populations: A Systematic Review of Effectiveness, Delivery Methods, and Engagement. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 16(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe16010002

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop