# Analyzing Impacts of Interfacial Instabilities on the Sweeping Power of Newtonian Fluids to Immiscibly Displace Power-Law Materials

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Methodology

#### 2.1. Numerical Approach

#### 2.2. Enforcing Boundary Conditions

#### 2.3. Modeling of Non-Newtonian Fluids

- Shear-thinning or pseudoplastic behavior;
- Viscoplastic behavior;
- Shear-thickening or dilatant behavior.

## 3. Numerical Modeling

#### 3.1. Code Validation

#### 3.2. Lattice Layout Study

#### 3.3. Numerical Procedure

- (1)
- Initialization of distribution functions and relaxation time;
- (2)
- Calculation of the macroscopic velocity and density;
- (3)
- Calculation of equilibrium distribution functions;
- (4)
- Calculation of the velocity gradient;
- (5)
- Calculation of viscosity using the structural equation of non-Newtonian fluids;
- (6)
- Calculation of the new relaxation time for non-Newtonian fluids;
- (7)
- Calculation of new distribution functions in the collision step;
- (8)
- Streaming distribution functions toward their adjacent points (propagation step);
- (9)
- Calculation of a new relaxation time, velocity field, and distribution functions for the next time step;
- (10)
- Repeating this process from step 2 to 9 for the next time step.

## 4. Results

- The location of max and min shear rates;
- The location of max viscosity;
- Max and min viscosity ratio at different cross-sectional areas.

#### 4.1. Impacts of Power-Law Index

#### 4.1.1. Displacement Shape Analyses

#### 4.1.2. Evaluation of Displacement Efficiency

#### 4.2. Impacts of Compatibility Factor

#### 4.2.1. Displacement Shape Analyses

#### 4.2.2. Evaluation of Displacement Efficiency

_{x}in Figure 29. In other words, because of enhanced interfacial instabilities and more severe mixing of the fluids, the mass fraction of the secondary fluid changes more strongly in every cross-section of the channel. It is worth noting that C

_{x}should fluctuate minimally (in the sections where the fingering structure exists) for a stable penetration with the least perturbations at the fluids’ interface.

## 5. Discussion

**Displacement total efficiency:**The viscosity ratio can regulate the displacement efficiency in two main ways; firstly, by altering the viscous forces against the invading fluid movement, and secondly, by adjustment of interfacial instabilities. Because of the higher viscosity of pseudoplastic fluids (compared to dilatant materials), it is more difficult for the injected Newtonian fluids to displace them. On the contrary, dilatant materials’ lower viscosity can magnify interfacial instabilities and violate the finger structure’s integrity, leading to higher efficiency. Therefore, the total displacement efficiency is not an appropriate criterion to determine the successful removal of the static wall layer. Consequently, we decided to investigate the displacement efficiency in each longitudinal and cross-sectional area of the channel over time.

**Static wall layers:**Removing static wall layers is an important issue when dealing with displacement flows and fingering problems. For dilatant materials, the viscous force mitigation against the injected fluid promotes the invading fluid’s tendency to go upward. Therefore, in comparison with other cases, it is expected there will be a thicker wall layer at the bottom of the channel and a thinner one adjacent to the top wall. However, as time elapses, the extension of the finger structure (i.e., interaction surface) magnifies interfacial instabilities. As a result, the static wall layer thickness does not behave according to the expectation for specific periods. In contrast, pseudoplastic fluids possess greater viscosities, and the maximum viscosity takes place around the centerline of the channel. Therefore, the invading fluid tends to move toward the channel walls leading to compression of the static wall layers. This compaction effect causes the static wall layers to initially possess smaller values in displacing pseudoplastic materials.

**Finger structure shape:**Buoyancy, viscous, and inertial forces control the invasion angle of the finger structure. While the buoyancy force pushes the injected fluid towards the channel walls, the viscous force moderates the finger structure’s upward and downward movement. Accordingly, small fluctuations of the fingertip in displacing pseudoplastic fluids represent the stabilizing effect of the forces. However, due to the low viscosity of dilatant fluids and viscosity ratio, the finger structure looks asymmetric along the longitudinal axis.

**Displacing pattern:**By tracing the tails of the finger structure, the sweeping power adjacent to the channel walls can be investigated. In pseudoplastic fluids, the higher viscosity of displaced fluid prevents the injected fluid from moving upward. On the other hand, the maximum viscosity of the displaced fluid occurs at the channel centerline, directing the invading fluid toward the channel walls. The two factors counterbalance the effects of each other. As a result, the location of the finger tail at the top of the channel does not change. The higher viscosity of pseudoplastic leads to compaction of the finger structure. Accordingly, the injected fluid tends to completely fill the cross-sectional areas at the beginning of the channel and move ahead. However, the injected fluid tends to reach the end of the channel rather than filling the cross-sectional areas when a Newtonian fluid is injected to displace a dilatant fluid.

**Compatibility factor vs. power-law index:**There is a linear relationship between viscosity and the compatibility factor. As expected, increasing the compatibility factor of the displaced fluid results in a reduction in displacement efficiency. However, compared to the nonlinear impact of the power-law index, compatibility factor alteration has a negligible effect on the location of the fingertip and top tail.

## 6. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Data Availability Statement

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Muggeridge, A.; Cockin, A.; Webb, K.; Frampton, H.; Collins, I.; Moulds, T.; Salino, P. Recovery rates, enhanced oil recovery and technological limits. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.
**2014**, 372, 20120320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Kargozarfard, Z.; Riazi, M.; Ayatollahi, S. Viscous fingering and its effect on areal sweep efficiency during waterflooding: An experimental study. Pet. Sci.
**2019**, 16, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Suzuki, R.X.; Nagatsu, Y.; Mishra, M.; Ban, T. Phase separation effects on a partially miscible viscous fingering dynamics. J. Fluid Mech.
**2020**, 898, A11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Song, W.; Ramesh, N.N.; Kovscek, A.R. Spontaneous fingering between miscible fluids. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp.
**2020**, 584, 123943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Abdul Hamid, S.A.; Muggeridge, A.H. Fingering regimes in unstable miscible displacements. Phys. Fluids
**2020**, 32, 016601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tsuzuki, R.; Ban, T.; Fujimura, M.; Nagatsu, Y. Dual role of surfactant-producing reaction in immiscible viscous fingering evolution. Phys. Fluids
**2019**, 31, 022102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jackson, S.J.; Power, H.; Giddings, D. Immiscible thermo-viscous fingering in Hele-Shaw cells. Comput. Fluids
**2017**, 156, 621–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Esmaeilpour, M.; Gholami Korzani, M. Enhancement of immiscible two-phase displacement flow by introducing nanoparticles and employing electro- and magneto-hydrodynamics. J. Pet. Sci. Eng.
**2021**, 196, 108044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Goyal, N.; Meiburg, E. Miscible displacements in Hele-Shaw cells: Two-dimensional base states and their linear stability. J. Fluid Mech.
**2006**, 558, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Petitjeans, P.; Maxworthy, T. Miscible displacements in capillary tubes. Part 1. Experiments. J. Fluid Mech.
**1996**, 326, 37–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lajeunesse, E.; Martin, J.; Rakotomalala, N.; Salin, D.; Yortsos, Y.C. Miscible displacement in a Hele-Shaw cell at high rates. J. Fluid Mech.
**1999**, 398, 299–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Taghavi, S.M.; Séon, T.; Wielage-Burchard, K.; Martinez, D.M.; Frigaard, I.A. Stationary residual layers in buoyant Newtonian displacement flows. Phys. Fluids
**2011**, 23, 044105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Taghavi, S.M.; Seon, T.; Martinez, D.M.; Frigaard, I.A. Buoyancy-dominated displacement flows in near-horizontal channels: The viscous limit. J. Fluid Mech.
**2009**, 639, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Sahu, K.C.; Ding, H.; Valluri, P.; Matar, O.K. Pressure-driven miscible two-fluid channel flow with density gradients. Phys. Fluids
**2009**, 21, 043603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Sahu, K.C.; Ding, H.; Valluri, P.; Matar, O.K. Linear stability analysis and numerical simulation of miscible two-layer channel flow. Phys. Fluids
**2009**, 21, 042104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Yang, Z.; Yortsos, Y.C. Asymptotic solutions of miscible displacements in geometries of large aspect ratio. Phys. Fluids
**1997**, 9, 286–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bischofberger, I.; Ramachandran, R.; Nagel, S.R. Fingering versus stability in the limit of zero interfacial tension. Nat. Commun.
**2014**, 5, 5265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shabouei, M.; Nakshatrala, K.B. On Numerical Stabilization in Modeling Double-Diffusive Viscous Fingering. Transp. Porous Media
**2020**, 132, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Redapangu, P.R.; Chandra Sahu, K.; Vanka, S.P. A study of pressure-driven displacement flow of two immiscible liquids using a multiphase lattice Boltzmann approach. Phys. Fluids
**2012**, 24, 102110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Dimakopoulos, Y.; Tsamopoulos, J. Transient displacement of a viscoplastic material by air in straight and suddenly constricted tubes. J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech.
**2003**, 112, 43–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Papaioannou, J.; Karapetsas, G.; Dimakopoulos, Y.; Tsamopoulos, J. Injection of a viscoplastic material inside a tube or between two parallel disks: Conditions for wall detachment of the advancing front. J. Rheol.
**2009**, 53, 1155–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ebrahimi, B.; Mostaghimi, P.; Gholamian, H.; Sadeghy, K. Viscous fingering in yield stress fluids: A numerical study. J. Eng. Math.
**2016**, 97, 161–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wielage-Burchard, K.; Frigaard, I.A. Static wall layers in plane channel displacement flows. J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech.
**2011**, 166, 245–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Frigaard, I.A.; Nouar, C. On the usage of viscosity regularisation methods for visco-plastic fluid flow computation. J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech.
**2005**, 127, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Allouche, M.; Frigaard, I.A.; Sona, G. Static wall layers in the displacement of two visco-plastic fluids in a plane channel. J. Fluid Mech.
**2000**, 424, 243–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mitsoulis, E.; Tsamopoulos, J. Numerical simulations of complex yield-stress fluid flows. Rheol. Acta
**2017**, 56, 231–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Khan, N.A.; Sultan, F. Numerical Analysis for the Bingham—Papanastasiou Fluid Flow Over a Rotating Disk. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys.
**2018**, 59, 638–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Baakeem, S.S.; Bawazeer, S.A.; Mohamad, A.A. Comparison and evaluation of Shan–Chen model and most commonly used equations of state in multiphase lattice Boltzmann method. Int. J. Multiph. Flow
**2020**, 128, 103290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chen, N.; Jin, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, P.; Chen, X. Lattice Boltzmann simulations of droplet dynamics in two-phase separation with temperature field. Phys. Fluids
**2020**, 32, 073312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gholami Korzani, M.; Galindo-Torres, S.A.; Scheuermann, A.; Williams, D.J. Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics for investigating hydraulic and mechanical behaviour of an embankment under action of flooding and overburden loads. Comput. Geotech.
**2018**, 94, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gholami Korzani, M.; Galindo Torres, S.; Scheuermann, A.; Williams, D.J. Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics into the Fluid Dynamics of Classical Problems. Appl. Mech. Mater.
**2016**, 846, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gholami Korzani, M.; Galindo-Torres, S.A.; Williams, D.; Scheuermann, A. Numerical Simulation of Tank Discharge Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics. Appl. Mech. Mater.
**2014**, 553, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Esmaeilpour, M.; Gholami Korzani, M.; Kohl, T. Performance Analyses of Deep Closed-loop U-shaped Heat Exchanger System with a Long Horizontal Extension. In Proceedings of the 46th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford, CA, USA, 16–18 February 2021; Stanford University: Stanford, CA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Sudhakar, T.; Das, A.K. Evolution of Multiphase Lattice Boltzmann Method: A Review. J. Inst. Eng. Ser. C
**2020**, 101, 711–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - He, X.; Chen, S.; Zhang, R. A Lattice Boltzmann Scheme for Incompressible Multiphase Flow and Its Application in Simulation of Rayleigh–Taylor Instability. J. Comput. Phys.
**1999**, 152, 642–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - He, X.; Zhang, R.; Chen, S.; Doolen, G.D. On the three-dimensional Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Phys. Fluids
**1999**, 11, 1143–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sahu, K.C.; Vanka, S.P. A multiphase lattice Boltzmann study of buoyancy-induced mixing in a tilted channel. Comput. Fluids
**2011**, 50, 199–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ezzatneshan, E.; Vaseghnia, H. Evaluation of equations of state in multiphase lattice Boltzmann method with considering surface wettability effects. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl.
**2020**, 541, 123258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ishak, M.H.H.; Ismail, F.; Abdul Aziz, M.S.; Abdullah, M.Z. Effect of adhesive force on underfill process based on lattice Boltzmann method. Microelectron. Int.
**2020**, 37, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yuana, K.A.; Budiana, E.P.; Deendarlianto; Indarto. Modeling and simulation of droplet wettability using multiphase Lattice Boltzmann method (LBM). AIP Conf. Proc.
**2019**, 2192, 070002. [Google Scholar] - Zachariah, G.T.; Panda, D.; Surasani, V.K. Lattice Boltzmann simulations for invasion patterns during drying of capillary porous media. Chem. Eng. Sci.
**2019**, 196, 310–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yang, L.; Yu, Y.; Yang, L.; Hou, G. Analysis and assessment of the no-slip and slip boundary conditions for the discrete unified gas kinetic scheme. Phys. Rev. E
**2020**, 101, 023312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Noble, D.R.; Georgiadis, J.G.; Buckius, R.O. Direct assessment of lattice Boltzmann hydrodynamics and boundary conditions for recirculating flows. J. Stat. Phys.
**1995**, 81, 17–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Guo, Z.; Zheng, C.; Shi, B. An extrapolation method for boundary conditions in lattice Boltzmann method. Phys. Fluids
**2002**, 14, 2007–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chen, S.; Martínez, D.; Mei, R. On boundary conditions in lattice Boltzmann methods. Phys. Fluids
**1996**, 8, 2527–2536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhao-Li, G.; Chu-Guang, Z.; Bao-Chang, S. Non-equilibrium extrapolation method for velocity and pressure boundary conditions in the lattice Boltzmann method. Chin. Phys. B
**2002**, 11, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Amani, A.; Balcázar, N.; Naseri, A.; Rigola, J. A numerical approach for non-Newtonian two-phase flows using a conservative level-set method. Chem. Eng. J.
**2020**, 385, 123896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ionescu, C.M.; Birs, I.R.; Copot, D.; Muresan, C.I.; Caponetto, R. Mathematical modelling with experimental validation of viscoelastic properties in non-Newtonian fluids. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.
**2020**, 378, 20190284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Shende, T.; Niasar, V.J.; Babaei, M. Effective viscosity and Reynolds number of non-Newtonian fluids using Meter model. Rheol. Acta
**2021**, 60, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lin, Y.; Yang, M. Marangoni flow and mass transfer of power-law non-Newtonian fluids over a disk with suction and injection. Commun. Theor. Phys.
**2020**, 72, 095003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yazdani, K.; Sahebjamei, M.; Ahmadpour, A. Natural Convection Heat Transfer and Entropy Generation in a Porous Trapezoidal Enclosure Saturated with Power-Law Non-Newtonian Fluids. Heat Transf. Eng.
**2020**, 41, 982–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Battistella, A.; van Schijndel, S.J.G.; Baltussen, M.W.; Roghair, I.; van Sint Annaland, M. On the terminal velocity of single bubbles rising in non-Newtonian power-law liquids. J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech.
**2020**, 278, 104249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 1.**A schematic illustration of the geometrical configuration (not to scale) and initial flow structure.

**Figure 3.**Viscosity changes versus shear rates in power-law fluids for different n ($\lambda $ = 0.4).

**Figure 4.**A comparison between the results of the present study and Redapangu et al. [19].

**Figure 6.**The effects of changes in the lattice layout on the mean thickness of the static layer left on the lower wall of the channel at different times.

**Figure 12.**A schematic demonstration of the displacement shape. ${X}_{t}$ is the location of the invading fluid front at the top of the channel, and ${X}_{b}$ is a similar location at the bottom of the channel. ${X}_{L}$ is called the attacking front, which is the front of the finger-like structure in the longitudinal direction. ${f}_{t}$ and ${f}_{b}$ represent the length of the finger structure (${f}_{t}={X}_{L}-{X}_{t},{f}_{b}={X}_{L}-{X}_{b}$). ${H}_{L}$ is the height of the attacking front.

**Figure 14.**The invading fluid front at the top of the channel, ${X}_{t}$, over time for different n.

**Figure 15.**The invading fluid front at the bottom of the channel, ${X}_{b}$, over time for different n.

**Figure 16.**The mean thickness of the static layer at the top of the channel, ${H}_{\mathrm{t}}$, over time for different n.

**Figure 17.**The mean thickness of the static layer at the bottom of the channel, ${H}_{\mathrm{b}}$, over time for different n.

**Figure 25.**The location of the advancing front at the bottom of the channel over time for different m.

**Figure 27.**The mean thickness of the static layer over time at the top of the channel for different m.

**Figure 28.**The mean thickness of the static layer over time at the bottom of the channel for different m.

m | Re | Ri | At | Ca | Inclination Angle | Pr | T |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

20 | 100 | 1 | 0.2 | $\infty $ | 45 | 1 | 50 |

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |

© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Esmaeilpour, M.; Gholami Korzani, M. Analyzing Impacts of Interfacial Instabilities on the Sweeping Power of Newtonian Fluids to Immiscibly Displace Power-Law Materials. *Processes* **2021**, *9*, 742.
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9050742

**AMA Style**

Esmaeilpour M, Gholami Korzani M. Analyzing Impacts of Interfacial Instabilities on the Sweeping Power of Newtonian Fluids to Immiscibly Displace Power-Law Materials. *Processes*. 2021; 9(5):742.
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9050742

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Esmaeilpour, Morteza, and Maziar Gholami Korzani. 2021. "Analyzing Impacts of Interfacial Instabilities on the Sweeping Power of Newtonian Fluids to Immiscibly Displace Power-Law Materials" *Processes* 9, no. 5: 742.
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9050742