Next Article in Journal
Targeting Collagen Type III in Proteinuric Kidney Disease: Informing Drug Potential Using the Jaccard–Tanimoto Index
Next Article in Special Issue
Chemical Characterization Using Different Analytical Techniques to Understand Processes: The Case of the Paraffinic Base Oil Production Line
Previous Article in Journal
An Overview of Household Energy Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Iran
Previous Article in Special Issue
As-Synthesized Oleic Amido Propyl Betaine Surfactant Mixture and the Effect on the Crude Oil–Seawater Interfacial Tension
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Heavy Crude Oil Samples and Their SARA Fractions with 13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

1
Institute of Physics, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlevskaya St., Kazan 420008, Russia
2
Department of Physical Chemistry, Butlerov Institute of Chemistry, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya St., Kazan 420008, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2020, 8(8), 995; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8080995
Submission received: 2 July 2020 / Revised: 10 August 2020 / Accepted: 13 August 2020 / Published: 16 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heavy Oils Conversion Processes)

Abstract

:
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) approaches have unique advantages in the analysis of crude oil because they are non-destructive and provide information on chemical functional groups. Nevertheless, the correctness and effectiveness of NMR techniques for determining saturates, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes (SARA analysis) without oil fractioning are still not clear. In this work we compared the measurements and analysis of high-resolution 13C NMR spectra in B0 ≈ 16.5 T (NMR frequency of 175 MHz) with the results of SARA fractioning for four various heavy oil samples with viscosities ranging from 100 to 50,000 mPa·s. The presence of all major hydrocarbon components both in crude oil and in each of its fractions was established quantitatively using NMR spectroscopy. Contribution of SARA fractions in the aliphatic (10–60 ppm) and aromatic (110–160 ppm) areas of the 13C NMR spectra were identified. Quantitative fractions of aromatic molecules and oil functional groups were determined. Aromaticity factor and the mean length of the hydrocarbon chain were estimated. The obtained results show the feasibility of 13C NMR spectroscopy for the express analysis of oil from physical properties to the composition of functional groups to follow oil treatment processes.

1. Introduction

Knowledge of the chemical composition of crude oil is necessary both for fundamental research and technological processes [1]. Despite the high efficiency of the available methods of oil separation and concentration of individual classes of compounds, there is a need for instrumental approaches to obtain additional detailed information about the structure and properties of the obtained fractions, in addition to characterizing complex oil systems in situ [2,3]. Unless modern tools of in-depth analysis are developed and exploited, information about the nature of oils, and products of their fractioning and processing, remain incomplete.
Use of radiospectroscopic techniques such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) [4], and their double (NMR and EPR) resonance combinations [5,6] in high magnetic fields (B0 > 1.5 T) have greatly expanded the possibilities for the selective detection of oil structural fragments and functional groups mainly due to the higher spectral resolution.
NMR spectroscopy is based on the phenomenon of resonance absorption of the energy of a radiofrequency (in the frequency range of about fRF = 1–1000 MHz) electromagnetic field due to atomic nuclei having a non-zero magnetic moment. Absorption frequencies depend on the isotopic species of the atom and, for a given isotope, on the position of the atom in the molecule, i.e., its spatial and electronic environment. Initially, NMR belonged to the realm of physics but after the discovery of the chemical shift (i.e., nuclei in different chemical surroundings have different resonance frequencies) the technique quickly became highly important as an analytical tool in chemistry [7,8,9,10,11]. The development of stronger magnets and of multidimensional NMR methods allowed its entry into the field of biology. As a result of its continuously increasing importance in modern chemistry, biochemistry, and medicine, three Nobel Prizes for NMR followed in 1991 (Richard Ernst), 2002 (Kurt Wuthrich), and 2003 (Lauterbur, Mansfield). NMR spectroscopy has also been known to be used for the characterization of petroleum components since 1959 [12,13,14,15,16,17,18].
The significance of this unique spectral analysis in terms of efficiency lies in the fact that it allows not only the determination of the structure of complex natural molecules, but also to determine their three-dimensional structure. This is achieved due to the fact that each spectrum contains a large amount of information, akin to the fingerprint of a molecule in the form of frequency lines that are stored in a database.
The main advantage of NMR in comparison with other types of spectroscopy is the possibility of transforming and modifying the nuclear spin Hamiltonian at the will of the experimenter practically without any restrictions and adjusting it to the special requirements of the problem to be solved [19,20,21,22,23]. Due to the great complexity of the picture of not fully resolved lines, many infrared and ultraviolet spectra cannot be deciphered. However, in NMR, transforming the Hamiltonian in such a way that the spectrum can be analyzed in detail makes it possible, in many cases, to simplify complex spectra. The ease with which it is possible to transform the nuclear spin Hamiltonian is due to a number of reasons. Because nuclear interactions are weak, strong perturbations can be introduced, sufficient to suppress unwanted interactions. In optical spectroscopy, the corresponding interactions have a much higher energy and such transformations are virtually impossible. The modification of the spin Hamiltonian plays an essential role in many applications of one-dimensional NMR spectroscopy. At present, the simplification of spectra or an increase in their information content with the help of spin decoupling, coherent averaging by multi-pulse sequences, rotation of samples, or partial orientation in liquid crystal solvents has become widespread [24,25,26,27].
Using NMR, it is possible to analyze the chemical nature of individual types of hydrogen and carbon atoms, in various and complex mixtures of petroleum and in the final products obtained by refining processes [28,29,30]. In the NMR spectra, the functional groups of aromatics, aliphatics, and olefins are well illustrated; accordingly, it is possible to differentiate a polynuclear aromatic from a mononuclear aromatic and to identify the fuel physical properties by the concentration of aromatics and the chain length of aliphatics. 1H NMR spectroscopy can be applied to the characterization and identification of crude oil fractions, and is a suitable means of predicting the total hydrogen content and the distribution of hydrogen among functional groups present in crude oil. Conversely, suitable information about the molecular carbon skeleton can be obtained by 13C NMR. For these reasons 13C NMR has become one of the most important methods in the analysis of crude oil fractions [31,32,33].
Interest in the determination of SARA (saturates, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes) components directly from the 13C NMR experiments is also governed by possibilities to enhance the NMR signal in heavy oils through dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) by applying EPR to the native for oil [6,34,35,36,37] or artificially introduced [38] paramagnetic centers. It was shown that 1H NMR signal enhancement depends not only on the type, electronic properties, concentration of paramagnetic species, and viscosity of oils but also on the SARA fraction [6,34] that can be selected in situ by choosing an appropriate repetition time of NMR experiment. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, all of the oil DNP measurements to date have been conducted on 1H nuclei. Obviously, as in the case of other NMR/DNP applications for biological investigations and material science [39], one should expect the rapid development of 13C DNP for oil studies.
Although attempts to find a correlation between the SARA analyses and NMR measurements have been undertaken for some time, in a well-known paper on this topic [19] it is emphasized that “the results cannot be generalized for other samples. To do that, it is mandatory to incorporate a wider range of experimental data of crude oils characterization and their respective” fractions.
Our current work presents the new results of a comprehensive investigation of samples of four crude oils and their sixteen SARA fractions to obtain data on structural group composition using quantitative 13C NMR spectroscopy in the magnetic field of B0 ≈ 16.5 T (fRF = 175 MHz). Information on the content of general functional groups obtained by 13C NMR spectroscopy can be useful for fast prediction of oil product properties that change under different types of treatment, in addition to the development of a fingerprinting approach.

2. Materials and Methods

For the current investigation we took four heavy (viscous) oils of various origin and their four SARA fractions (a total of 20 samples). A list of the studied samples and the viscosities of the initial oil is presented in Table 1.

2.1. SARA Fractionation

According to the ASTM 2007 standard, oil samples were divided into their fractions: saturates, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes (SARA). Asphaltenes were separated from oils by precipitation with heptane (40:1) for 24 h and subsequent purification from maltenes (saturate, aromatic, and resin) in a Soxhlet extractor [40,41]. The results of SARA analysis of all studied oil samples are reported in Table 2. The analytical parameters, tools, and separation conditions for conducting SARA analysis are shown in Table 3.

2.2. 13C NMR Spectroscopy

NMR experiments on the initial oil samples (1–4) and their fractions (1s–1as, 2s–2as, 3s–3as, 4s–4as) were performed on a Bruker Avance III HD 700 MHz spectrometer equipped with a quadruple resonance (1H, 13C, 15N, 31P) QCI CryoProbe. All samples of crude oils and their fractions were diluted in deutered chloroform (CDCl3) solvent. Field lock and shimming were achieved using the deuterium signal of CDCl3. 13C NMR spectra were recorded using 90° pulses with 11.7 μs pulse length and with inverse gated broadband proton decoupling (zgig pulse program); relaxation delay between pulses was 9 s and acquisition time was 3.5 s; spectrum width was set to 220.0 ppm; the number of scans was 3200. An exponential digital filter with the line broadening factor of 10 Hz was applied to process 13C NMR spectra prior to Fourier transformation. Measurements were conducted at the temperature of 30 °C. All NMR spectra were integrated after baseline correction, and at least three integration values were taken for each calculation. The relative standard deviation of the results of manual integration did not exceed 3%. The integration of the resonance lines in the 13C NMR spectra was carried out with respect to the 13C signal of the CDCl3 solvent, for which the value was taken as 1. Estimation of molar fractions of primary (Cp), secondary and quaternary (Csq), tertiary (Ct), aromatic (Car) carbons, aromaticity factor (FCA), and mean chain length (MCL) of aliphatic hydrocarbons was carried out in a way similar to our previous work (see References [40,42] and data presented in Supplementary Materials).

3. Results and Discussion

The 13C NMR spectra of crude oils 1–4 dissolved in CDCl3 are shown in Figure 1.
The broadening of resonance lines in the aromatic region of the spectrum in the transition from the light oil sample (1) to the heavier oil samples (2–4) is observed. Table 4 shows the results of estimating the molar content of various carbon groups of samples 1–4 made by integration of the corresponding areas of 13C NMR spectra.
A quantitative analysis of the composition of the oil samples studied by NMR showed that as the oil viscosity increases, a decrease of Cp and Csq parameters and increase in Ct and Car parameters are observed. Moreover, the concentration of aromatic groups (Car) in heavy oil sample 4 increases almost two times compared to the less viscous oil sample 1. In addition, with increasing viscosity, the aromaticity factor (FCA) shows an obvious tendency to increase.
Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5 show 13C NMR spectra of saturated, aromatic, resin, and asphaltene fractions of the studied oil samples. There is also a trend towards broadening of resonance lines in the aromatic area of the spectrum in the transition from the light saturates fraction to the heavier fractions. Quantitative data on the proportions of primary, secondary, tertiary, quaternary, and aromatic carbon atoms of the studied oil fraction samples were also obtained and are presented in Table 5, Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8.
Quantitative analysis of the composition of saturated compounds (1s), aromatics (1ar), resins (1r), and asphaltene fraction (1as) of oil sample 1 studied by NMR showed that as the fraction gravity increases, a decrease in parameters Cp, Csq and increase in Ct, Car, FCA are observed. In addition, with increasing fraction gravity, there is a tendency for the MCL parameter to increase up to 13.3.
Quantitative analysis of the composition of saturated compounds (2s), aromatics (2ar), resins (2r), and asphaltene fraction (2as) of oil sample 2 studied by NMR showed that as the fraction gravity increases, Cp and Csq parameters decrease. However, the concentration of tertiary carbons (Ct) in this case also decreases on average, unlike in the case of sample 1. The concentration of aromatic carbons (Car) takes the lowest value (4.3%) for the sample of saturates fraction 2s; then, as fraction gravity increases, this parameter evenly increases. In addition, with increasing fraction gravity, there is a tendency for the FCA and MCL parameters to increase.
Quantitative analysis of the composition of saturated compounds (3s), aromatics (3ar), resins (3r), and asphaltene fraction (3as) of oil sample 3 studied by NMR showed that increasing the fraction gravity is accompanied by a decrease in the Cp, Csq, and Ct parameters and an increase in the parameter Car. In addition, with increasing fraction gravity, there is a tendency for the FCA and MCL parameters to increase.
The behavior of the studied parameters for the fraction samples of the heaviest oil 4 is the same as for the fraction samples of the lightest oil 1. A quantitative analysis of the composition of saturated compounds (4s), aromatics (4ar), resins (4r), and asphaltene fraction (4as) extracted from oil sample 4 studied by NMR showed that an increase in the fraction gravity correlates with a decrease in parameters Cp and Csq, and an increase in Ct, Car, FCA, and MCL. Thus, the maximum value of the mean chain length (MCL) equal to 15.8 is observed for the asphaltene fraction of oil sample 4.
Figure 6 shows a summary diagram of changes of the obtained structural group parameters Cp, Csq, Ct, Car, FCA, and MCL for the studied oil samples. This diagram allows us to analyze how the obtained parameters change according to two criteria: the gravity of the fraction (growing from saturates to asphaltenes) and viscosity of the sample (an increase within the same fraction from sample 1 to sample 4). Thus, for the Cp parameter there is a general decrease of approximately twofold in values as the gravity of the fraction increases. However, analysis of the dependence of the parameter Cp on the sample viscosity among individual fractions shows an ambiguous picture: for saturates and asphaltenes there is a slight decrease in the values of Cp, while for the aromatic and resin fractions the values of Cp slightly increase. A similar trend in changes in individual fractions is observed for the parameter Csq. However, it was noticed that the reduction in Csq for saturates and asphaltenes as the viscosity of the sample increases occurs more sharply than for Cp. Analysis of the parameter Ct showed that for each fraction its value increases strongly as the viscosity of the samples increases. Furthermore, by the gravity of the fraction increases, there is an increase in Ct values for samples 1 and 4 and a decrease for samples 2 and 3. The behavior of the Car parameter as the gravity of the fraction increases is exactly opposite to the case of Cp: its values increase sharply. However, its values within individual fractions as the sample viscosity increases have a general tendency to decrease. As an exception to this rule, however, there is a sharp increase in the values of the Car parameter of sample 3 for saturates and asphaltene fractions. In addition, there is a very sharp drop of the Car parameter value (down to 4.3%) of sample 2 for the aromatics fraction.
The remaining parameters—aromaticity factor (FCA) and mean chain length (MCL) of aliphatic hydrocarbons—are indirect. For example, the values of parameter FCA strongly depend on the values of parameter Car. Therefore, the behavior of its value both with increasing the gravity of the fraction and increasing the sample viscosity within a separate fraction is similar to the behavior of parameter Car, however, its changes occur more smoothly. The values of the mean chain length (MCL) of aliphatic hydrocarbons, as expected, grow both as the gravity of the fraction and the sample viscosity within a separate fraction increase.

4. Conclusions

13C NMR spectroscopy can significantly expand the repertoire of research methods to study structural-group composition of oil and oil fractions, and adequately describe qualitatively and quantitatively not only the elemental composition but also the molecular structures of natural organic material, its fractions, and intermediate and target products. These characteristics determine both the properties of objects and the strategy of various technological schemes for oil upgrading or for extraction of different fractions and groups.
Regarding specific results, we determined the contribution of fractions of oil in the aliphatic (10–60 ppm) and aromatic (110–160 ppm) areas of the 13C NMR spectra. We demonstrated that NMR spectroscopy methods make it easy to establish the quantitative presence of the main hydrocarbon components in any fraction of oil. The quantitative fractions of the main functional groups constituting oil hydrocarbons and hydrocarbons of the main oil fractions (saturates, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes) in several samples were determined and their variations were shown.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/8/8/995/s1.

Author Contributions

M.V. and V.K. conceived and designed the research. I.R. and S.E. performed the NMR study. A.A.-M. performed SARA fractionation. I.R., M.G. and V.T. analyzed the data and wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is financially supported by Russian Science Foundation (Project № 19-12-00332).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Speight, J. The Chemistry and Technology of Petroleum, 5th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shukla, A.K. Analytical Characterization Methods for Crude Oil and Related Products; JohnWiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  3. Speight, J.G. Petroleum asphaltenes: Part 1: Asphaltenes, resins and the structure of petroleum. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. Rev. IFP 2004, 59, 467–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Mamin, G.V.; Gafurov, M.R.; Yusupov, R.V.; Gracheva, I.N.; Ganeeva, Y.M.; Yusupova, T.N.; Orlinskii, S.B. Toward the asphaltene structure by electron paramagnetic resonance relaxation studies at high fields (3.4 T). Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 6942–6946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Gafurov, M.; Mamin, G.; Gracheva, I.; Murzakhanov, F.; Ganeeva, Y.; Yusupova, T.; Orlinskii, S. High-Field (3.4 T) ENDOR investigation of asphaltenes in native oil and vanadyl complexes by asphaltene adsorption on alumina surface. Geofluids 2019, 2019, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Gizatullin, B.; Gafurov, M.; Rodionov, A.; Mamin, G.; Mattea, C.; Stapf, S.; Orlinskii, S. Proton–radical interaction in crude oil—A combined NMR and EPR Study. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 11261–11268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kvalheim, O.M.; Aksnes, D.W.; Brekke, T.; Eide, M.O.; Sletten, E. Crude oil characterization and correlation by principal component analysis of 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectra. Anal. Chem. 1985, 57, 2858–2864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gao, G.; Cao, J.; Xu, T.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, K. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of crude oil as proxies for oil source and thermal maturity based on 1H and 13C spectra. Fuel 2020, 271, 117622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Netzel, D.A.; Thompson, L.F. Aromatic tertiary carbons as a check of the validity of NMR fossil fuels. Fuel 1986, 65, 597–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Breitmaier, E.; Hass, G.; Voelter, W. Atlas of Carbon-13 NMR Data; Heyden and Son: London, UK, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  11. Edwards, J.C. A review of applications of NMR spectroscopy in the petroleum industry. In Spectroscopic Analysis of Petroleum Products and Lubricants; Nadkarni, R.A., Ed.; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2011; pp. 423–473. [Google Scholar]
  12. Derome, A.E. Modern NMR Techniques for Chemistry Research; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  13. Günther, H. NMR Spectroscopy: Basic Principles, Concepts, and Applications in Chemistry, 3rd ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ernst, R.; Bodenhausen, G.; Wokaun, A. Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions; International Series of Monographs on Chemistry, Book 14; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  15. Rule, G.S.; Hitchens, T.K. Fundamentals of Protein NMR Spectroscopy; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  16. Friedel, R.A. Absorption spectra and magnetic resonance spectra of asphaltene. J. Chem. Phys. 1959, 31, 280–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Clutter, D.R.; Petrakis, L.; Stenger, J.R.L.; Jensen, R.K. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometry of petroleum fractions. Carbon-13 and proton nuclear magnetic resonance characterizations in terms of average molecule parameters. Anal. Chem. 1972, 44, 1395–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Snape, C.E.; Ladner, W.R.; Bartle, K.D. Survey of carbon-13 chemical shifts in aromatic hydrocarbons and its application to coal-derived materials. Anal. Chem. 1979, 51, 2189–2198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sanchez-Minero, F.; Ancheyta, J.; Silva-Oliver, G.; Flores-Valle, S. Predicting SARA composition of crude oil by means of NMR. Fuel 2013, 110, 318–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kök, M.V.; Varfolomeev, M.A.; Nurgaliev, D.K. Determination of SARA fractions of crude oils by NMR technique. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2019, 179, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  21. Woods, J.; Kung, J.; Kingston, D.; Kotlyar, L.; Sparks, B.; McCracken, T. Canadian crudes: A comparative study of SARA fractions from a modified HPLC separation technique. Oil Gas Sci. Tech. 2008, 63, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Molina, D.; Uribe, U.N.; Murgich, J. Correlations between SARA fractions and physicochemical properties with 1H NMR spectra of vacuum residues from Colombian crude oils. Fuel 2010, 89, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hauser, A.; AlHumaidan, F.; Al-Rabiah, H.; Halabi, M.A. Study on thermal cracking of Kuwaiti heavy oil (vacuum residue) and its SARA fractions by NMR spectroscopy. Energy Fuels 2014, 28, 4321–4332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bahramzadeh, S.; Tabarsa, M.; You, S.; Yelithao, K.; Klochkov, V.; Rakhmatullin, I. An arabinogalactan isolated from Boswellia carterii: Purification, structural elucidation and macrophage stimulation via NF-κB and MAPK pathways. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 52, 450–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Scheeder, G.; Weniger, P.; Blumenberg, M. Geochemical implications from direct Rock-Eval pyrolysis of petroleum. Org. Geochem. 2020, 146, 104051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Davydov, V.V.; Dudkin, V.I.; Vysoczky, M.G.; Myazin, N.S. Small-size NMR Spectrometer for Express Control of Liquid Media State. Appl. Magn. Reson. 2020, 51, 653–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rudyk, S. Relationships between SARA fractions of conventional oil, heavy oil, natural bitumen and residues. Fuel 2018, 216, 330–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Holzgrabe, U. Quantitative NMR, methods and applications. In Encyclopedia of Spectroscopy and Spectrometry, 3rd ed.; Lindon, J.C., Tranter, G.E., Koppenaal, D.W., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 816–823. [Google Scholar]
  29. Poveda, J.-C.; Molina, D.-R.; Pantoja-Agreda, E.-F. 1H- and 13C-NMR structural characterization of asphaltenes from Vacuum residua modified by thermal cracking. CtF 2014, 5, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Oliveira Da Silva, E.C.; Neto, A.C.; Valdemar, L.J.; De Castro, E.V.R.; De Menezes, S.M.C. Study of Brazilian asphaltene aggregation by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Fuel 2014, 117, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. McBeath, A.V.; Smernik, R.J.; Schneider, M.P.W.; Schmidt, M.W.I.; Plant, E.L. Determination of the aromaticity and the degree of aromatic condensation of a thermosequence of wood charcoal using NMR. Org. Geochem. 2011, 42, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fergoug, T.; Bouhadda, Y. Determination of Hassi Messaoud asphaltene aromatic structure from 1H & 13C NMR analysis. Fuel 2014, 115, 521–526. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lee, S.W.; Glavincevski, B.B. NMR method for determination of aromatics in middle distillate oils. Fuel Process. Technol. 1999, 60, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gizatullin, B.; Gafurov, M.; Vakhin, A.; Rodionov, A.; Mamin, G.; Orlinskii, S.; Mattea, C.; Stapf, S. Native Vanadyl Complexes in Crude Oil as Polarizing Agents for In Situ Proton Dynamic Nuclear Polarization. Energy Fuels 2019, 33, 10923–10932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Alexandrov, A.S.; Archipov, R.V.; Ivanov, A.A.; Gnezdilov, O.I.; Gafurov, M.R.; Skirda, V.D. The low-field pulsed mode dynamic nuclear polarization in the pentavalent chromium complex and crude oils. Appl. Magn. Reson. 2014, 45, 1275–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Poindexter, E. An Overhauser Effect in Natural Crude Oil. Nature 1958, 182, 1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Peksoz, A.; Almaz, E.; Yalciner, A. The characterization of asphaltene behavior in some aromatic solvents by dynamic nuclear polarization technique. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2010, 75, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, J.; Feng, J.; Chen, F.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, L.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, C. Characterizing oils in oil-water mixtures inside porous media by Overhauser dynamic nuclear polarization. Fuel 2019, 257, 116107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Corzilius, B. High-Field Dynamic Nuclear Polarization. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2020, 71, 143–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Rakhmatullin, I.Z.; Efimov, S.V.; Tyurin, V.A.; Al-Muntaser, A.A.; Klimovitskii, A.E.; Varfolomeev, M.A.; Klochkov, V.V. Application of high resolution NMR (1H and 13C) and FTIR spectroscopy for characterization of light and heavy crude oils. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2018, 168, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bissada, K.K.A.; Tan, J.; Szymczyk, E.; Darnell, M.; Mei, M.; Zhou, J. Group-type characterization of crude oil and bitumen. Part I: Enhanced separation and quantification of saturates, aromatics, resins and asphaltenes (SARA). Org. Geochem. 2016, 95, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rakhmatullin, I.Z.; Efimov, S.V.; Margulis, B.Y.; Klochkov, V.V. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of oil samples extracted from some Bashkortostan and Tatarstan oilfields based on NMR spectroscopy data. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2017, 156, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. 13C (175 MHz) NMR spectra of oil samples 1–4 in CDCl3.
Figure 1. 13C (175 MHz) NMR spectra of oil samples 1–4 in CDCl3.
Processes 08 00995 g001
Figure 2. 13C (175 MHz) NMR spectra of oil samples 1s–1as (s—saturated compounds, ar—aromatics, r—resins, as—asphaltene fraction).
Figure 2. 13C (175 MHz) NMR spectra of oil samples 1s–1as (s—saturated compounds, ar—aromatics, r—resins, as—asphaltene fraction).
Processes 08 00995 g002
Figure 3. 13C (175 MHz) NMR spectra of oil samples 2s–2as (s—saturated compounds, ar—aromatics, r—resins, as—asphaltene fraction).
Figure 3. 13C (175 MHz) NMR spectra of oil samples 2s–2as (s—saturated compounds, ar—aromatics, r—resins, as—asphaltene fraction).
Processes 08 00995 g003
Figure 4. 13C (175 MHz) NMR spectra of oil samples 3s–3as (s—saturated compounds, ar—aromatics, r—resins, as—asphaltene fraction).
Figure 4. 13C (175 MHz) NMR spectra of oil samples 3s–3as (s—saturated compounds, ar—aromatics, r—resins, as—asphaltene fraction).
Processes 08 00995 g004
Figure 5. 13C (175 MHz) NMR spectra of oil samples 4s–4as (s—saturated compounds, ar—aromatics, r—resins, as—asphaltene fraction).
Figure 5. 13C (175 MHz) NMR spectra of oil samples 4s–4as (s—saturated compounds, ar—aromatics, r—resins, as—asphaltene fraction).
Processes 08 00995 g005
Figure 6. Diagram of changes of obtained parameters Cp, Csq, Ct, Car, FCA, and MCL for the studied samples of oil fractions.
Figure 6. Diagram of changes of obtained parameters Cp, Csq, Ct, Car, FCA, and MCL for the studied samples of oil fractions.
Processes 08 00995 g006
Table 1. Studied oil samples and the viscosities of the initial oil species.
Table 1. Studied oil samples and the viscosities of the initial oil species.
Sample Number 1Viscosity, mPa·sOrigin of Oil
1,
1s, 1ar, 1r, 1as
106Iraq
2,
2s, 2ar, 2r, 2as
1430Ambar gatur (Turkmenistan)
3,
3s, 3ar, 3r, 3as
2420Ashal’cha (Republic of Tatarstan, Russia)
4,
4s, 4ar, 4r, 4as
49,700Cuba
1 s—saturated compounds, ar—aromatics, r—resins, as—asphaltene fraction.
Table 2. SARA analysis (%) of studied oil samples.
Table 2. SARA analysis (%) of studied oil samples.
Sample Number1234
Saturates, %59.673.726.231.0
Aromatics, %26.714.340.639.2
Resins, %12.19.828.514.2
Asphaltenes, %1.62.24.715.6
Table 3. The analytical parameters, tools, and separation conditions for conducting SARA analysis.
Table 3. The analytical parameters, tools, and separation conditions for conducting SARA analysis.
ParameterDetails
sample size1 g of oil
precipitation of asphaltenes
(fold amount of n-alkane)
1:40 heptane
time of precipitation24 h
temperature of precipitationroom temperature
filtration paper2.5 μm filter
asphaltene washinghot heptane
asphaltene extractiontoluene
adsorbentalumina activated at 430 °C
saturates elution200 mL of heptane
aromatics elution200 mL of toluene
resins elution200 mL of 1:1 toluene-isopropyl alcohol
solvent removalrotary evaporator
Table 4. Molar fractions (%) of primary (Cp), secondary and quaternary (Csq), tertiary (Ct), aromatic (Car) groups, aromaticity factor (FCA), and mean chain length (MCL) of aliphatic hydrocarbons based on 13C NMR spectra of samples 1–4.
Table 4. Molar fractions (%) of primary (Cp), secondary and quaternary (Csq), tertiary (Ct), aromatic (Car) groups, aromaticity factor (FCA), and mean chain length (MCL) of aliphatic hydrocarbons based on 13C NMR spectra of samples 1–4.
Sample Number1234
Cp25.818.821.618.8
Csq53.052.648.936.6
Ct10.013.912.815.1
Car12.514.719.327.5
FCA0.1230.1470.1880.275
MCL6.99.17.77.7
Table 5. Molar fractions (%) of primary (Cp), secondary and quaternary (Csq), tertiary (Ct), aromatic (Car) groups, aromaticity factor (FCA), and mean chain length (MCL) of aliphatic hydrocarbons based on 13C NMR spectra of samples 1, 1s–1as.
Table 5. Molar fractions (%) of primary (Cp), secondary and quaternary (Csq), tertiary (Ct), aromatic (Car) groups, aromaticity factor (FCA), and mean chain length (MCL) of aliphatic hydrocarbons based on 13C NMR spectra of samples 1, 1s–1as.
Sample number11s1ar1r1as
SARA fractions, %crude oil (100%)saturated compounds (59.6%)aromatics (26.7%)resins (12.1%)asphaltene fraction (1.6%)
Cp25.816.712.09.59.0
Csq53.054.040.438.733.3
Ct10.014.113.013.117.7
Car12.515.234.638.740.0
FCA0.1230.1520.3460.3870.400
MCL6.910.110.912.913.3
Table 6. Molar fractions (%) of primary (Cp), secondary and quaternary (Csq), tertiary (Ct), aromatic (Car) groups, aromaticity factor (FCA), and mean chain length (MCL) of aliphatic hydrocarbons based on 13C NMR spectra of samples 2, 2s–2as.
Table 6. Molar fractions (%) of primary (Cp), secondary and quaternary (Csq), tertiary (Ct), aromatic (Car) groups, aromaticity factor (FCA), and mean chain length (MCL) of aliphatic hydrocarbons based on 13C NMR spectra of samples 2, 2s–2as.
Sample Number22s2ar2r2as
SARA fractions, %crude oil (100%)saturated compounds (73.7%)aromatics (14.3%)resins (9.8%)asphaltene fraction (2.2%)
Cp18.815.811.59.59.1
Csq52.659.045.239.238.5
Ct13.920.916.018.018.0
Car14.74.327.333.334.4
FCA0.1470.0430.2730.3330.344
MCL9.112.112.614.014.4
Table 7. Molar fractions (%) of primary (Cp), secondary and quaternary (Csq), tertiary (Ct), aromatic (Car) groups, aromaticity factor (FCA), and mean chain length (MCL) of aliphatic hydrocarbons based on 13C NMR spectra of samples 3, 3s–3as.
Table 7. Molar fractions (%) of primary (Cp), secondary and quaternary (Csq), tertiary (Ct), aromatic (Car) groups, aromaticity factor (FCA), and mean chain length (MCL) of aliphatic hydrocarbons based on 13C NMR spectra of samples 3, 3s–3as.
Sample Number33s3ar3r3as
SARA fractions, %crude oil (100%)saturated compounds (26.2%)aromatics (40.6%)resins (28.5%)asphaltene fraction (4.7%)
Cp21.616.412.510.27.1
Csq48.941.141.939.434.8
Ct12.819.920.117.212.2
Car19.322.625.533.245.9
FCA0.1880.2260.2550.3320.459
MCL7.79.411.913.115.2
Table 8. Molar fractions (%) of primary (Cp), secondary and quaternary (Csq), tertiary (Ct), aromatic (Car) groups, aromaticity factor (FCA), and mean chain length (MCL) of aliphatic hydrocarbons based on 13C NMR spectra of samples 4, 4s–4as.
Table 8. Molar fractions (%) of primary (Cp), secondary and quaternary (Csq), tertiary (Ct), aromatic (Car) groups, aromaticity factor (FCA), and mean chain length (MCL) of aliphatic hydrocarbons based on 13C NMR spectra of samples 4, 4s–4as.
Sample Number44s4ar4r4as
SARA fractions, %crude oil (100%)saturated compounds (31.0%)aromatics (39.2%)resins (14.2%)asphaltene fraction (15.6%)
Cp18.815.313.310.78.3
Csq36.648.146.643.027.1
Ct15.125.026.523.930.0
Car27.511.613.622.434.6
FCA0.2750.1160.1360.2240.346
MCL7.711.513.014.515.8

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rakhmatullin, I.; Efimov, S.; Tyurin, V.; Gafurov, M.; Al-Muntaser, A.; Varfolomeev, M.; Klochkov, V. Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Heavy Crude Oil Samples and Their SARA Fractions with 13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Processes 2020, 8, 995. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8080995

AMA Style

Rakhmatullin I, Efimov S, Tyurin V, Gafurov M, Al-Muntaser A, Varfolomeev M, Klochkov V. Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Heavy Crude Oil Samples and Their SARA Fractions with 13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Processes. 2020; 8(8):995. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8080995

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rakhmatullin, Ilfat, Sergey Efimov, Vladimir Tyurin, Marat Gafurov, Ameen Al-Muntaser, Mikhail Varfolomeev, and Vladimir Klochkov. 2020. "Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Heavy Crude Oil Samples and Their SARA Fractions with 13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance" Processes 8, no. 8: 995. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8080995

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop