Next Article in Journal
Iron Oxide/Salicylic Acid Nanoparticles as Potential Therapy for B16F10 Melanoma Transplanted on the Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane
Previous Article in Journal
Automatic Implementation of a Self-Adaption Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring Method Based on the Convolutional Neural Network
Previous Article in Special Issue
Measuring the Implications of Sustainable Manufacturing in the Context of Industry 4.0
Open AccessReview

A Review of the Criteria and Methods of Reverse Logistics Supplier Selection

by Xumei Zhang 1,*, Zhizhao Li 1 and Yan Wang 2
1
School of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430065, China
2
School of Computing, Engineering & Maths, University of Brighton, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2020, 8(6), 705; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8060705
Received: 30 May 2020 / Revised: 14 June 2020 / Accepted: 15 June 2020 / Published: 18 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Green Technologies for Production Processes)
This article presents a literature review on reverse logistics (RL) supplier selection in terms of criteria and methods. A systematic view of past work published between 2008 and 2020 on Web of Science (WOS) databases is provided by reviewing, categorizing, and analyzing relevant papers. Based on the analyses of 41 articles, we propose a three-stage typology of decision-making frameworks to understanding RL supplier selection, including (a) establishment of the selection criteria; (b) calculation of the relative weights and ranking of the selection criteria; (c) ranking of alternatives (suppliers). The main discoveries of this review are as follows. (1) Attention to the field of RL supplier selection is increasing, as evidenced by the increasing number of papers in the field. With the adaption of circular economy legislation and the need resource and business resilience, it is expected that RL and RL supplier selection will be a hot topic in the near future. (2) A large number of papers take “sustainability” as the theoretical approach to carry out research and use it as the basis for determining the criteria. (3) Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods have been widely used in RL supplier selection and have been constantly innovated. (4) Artificial intelligence methods are also gradually being applied. Finally, gaps in the literature are identified to provide directions for future research. (5) Value-added service is underrepresented in the current study and needs further attention. View Full-Text
Keywords: reverse logistics; supplier selection; MCDM; sustainability reverse logistics; supplier selection; MCDM; sustainability
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Li, Z.; Wang, Y. A Review of the Criteria and Methods of Reverse Logistics Supplier Selection. Processes 2020, 8, 705.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop