Next Article in Journal
Improvement of the Mechanical Properties of Thermosetting-Binding-System-Based Composites by Means of Kneading Procedure Modification and Composite Formulation
Previous Article in Journal
Performance Evaluation of Elimination of Stagnation of Solar Thermal Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rheological Properties of Aqueous Dispersions of Bacterial Cellulose
Open AccessFeature PaperReview

Bacterial Cellulose as a Versatile Platform for Research and Development of Biomedical Materials

Institute of Engineering Materials and Design, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maribor, Smetanova ul. 17, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
Institute of Automation, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, Koroška cesta 46, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
Processes 2020, 8(5), 624;
Received: 8 May 2020 / Revised: 19 May 2020 / Accepted: 20 May 2020 / Published: 22 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Preparation of Bacterial Cellulose and its Biomedical Applications)


The unique pool of features found in intracellular and extracellular bacterial biopolymers attracts a lot of research, with bacterial cellulose (BC) being one of the most versatile and common. BC is an exopolysaccharide consisting solely of cellulose, and the variation in the production process can vary its shape or even its composition when compounding is applied in situ. Together with ex situ modification pathways, including specialised polymers, particles or exclusively functional groups, BC provides a robust platform that yields complex multifunctional compounds that go far beyond ultra-high purity, intrinsic hydrophilicity, mechanical strength and biocompatibility to introduce bioactive, (pH, thermal, electro) responsive, conductive and ‘smart’ properties. This review summarises the research outcomes in BC-medical applications, focusing mainly on data from the past decade (i.e., 2010–2020), with special emphasis on BC nanocomposites as materials and devices applicable in medicine. The high purity and unique structural/mechanical features, in addition to its capacity to closely adhere to irregular skin surfaces, skin tolerance, and demonstrated efficacy in wound healing, all stand as valuable attributes advantageous in topical drug delivery. Numerous studies prove BC compatibility with various human cells, with modifications even improving cell affinity and viability. Even BC represents a physical barrier that can reduce the penetration of bacteria into the tissue, but in its native form does not exhibit antimicrobial properties, therefore carious modifications have been made or specific compounds added to confer antimicrobial or anti-inflammatory properties. Progress in the use of BC-compounds as wound dressings, vascular grafts, and scaffolds for the treatment of cartilage, bone and osteochondral defects, the role as a basement membrane in blood-brain barrier models and many more are discussed to particular extent, emphasising the need for BC compounding to meet specific requirements.
Keywords: bacterial cellulose; biocompatibility; biomedical application; wound dressings; scaffolds; drug delivery; antimicrobial; medical device bacterial cellulose; biocompatibility; biomedical application; wound dressings; scaffolds; drug delivery; antimicrobial; medical device

1. Introduction

Biopolymers are produced by living organisms, namely the prokaryotes and eukaryotes, as extra- or intracellular compounds, synthesised by means of processive enzymes. Latter ‘joins’ the amino acids, sugars, sugar acids, hydroxy fatty acids or inorganic phosphates utilising glucosidic, peptide, ester or anhydride bonds to form molecules with higher molecular weight, such as polysaccharides, polyamides, polyesters, and polyphosphates. Ref. [1] Acting as a prime cell factories, different bacteria utilise the carbon and nitrogen sources, transforming them into complex compounds from group of polysaccharides, polyamides, polyesters, polyphosphates, extracellular DNA and proteins, etc.
The unique combination of properties found in intracellular and extracellular bacterial biopolymers attracts a wide range of research, with bacterial cellulose (BC) being one of the most versatile and common. BC is a homopolysaccharide consisting of cellulose (C6H10O5)n, in the form of a linear monosaccharide chain β-D-glucose linked by a β(1 → 4) bond, the repeating unit consisting of two glucose units, i.e., cellobiose (Figure 1).
BC is produced as an exopolysaccharide from various Gram-, non-pathogenic bacterial strains, such as Achromobacter, Alcaligenes, Aerobacter, Agrobacterium, Azotobacter, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, Sarcina, Dickeya and Rhodobacter, which have been reported to extracellularly produce BC, nevertheless the genus Komagataeibacter (formerly Acetobacter xylinum) is the most commonly reported strain. Ref. [3,4,5,6] This bacterium produces BC by two coupled processes: First presenting the polymerization of glucose residues, joining within β-1,4 linear glycan chains and extracellular secretion, and second, the crystallization phase where chains fuse alongside and formed microfibrils. The second phase follows the formation of layers of glucan chains by van der Waals forces and the assembling of the layers into ribbons, made of up to 100 microfibrils. Ref. [7] A certain number of monofilaments aggregated into fibrous fibres (like ribbons) with a width of 20–60 nm, which solidify on the culturing medium surface of a liquid medium to form a three-dimensional, gelatinous, highly entangled network.
Various wastes and by-products have been studied as carbon sources: fruits, the biodiesel by-product glycerol, date syrup, commercial sucrose, stillage from rice mine distillation, hydrolysates from wheat straw and cotton fabric, grape bagasse, saccharified food waste, flour from bread and confectionery waste, waste from the sunflower-based biodiesel industry, etc. BC share same molecular formula as plant celluloses, yet is free of lignin, hemicelluloses and pectin found in its plant- relatives; it also possess distinguished features, such as ultra-high (up to 90% crystallinity), polymerization degree ~1000 units, large surface area derive from <100 nm-thick fibres, remarkable mechanical properties in term of flexibility and tensile strength, high water holding capacity (two logs higher than its dry weigh), etc. Ref. [8] As a high-purity biological nonwoven, the BC gained interest in medicine for 30 years, where its use range from simple wound bandaging biotextile, up to complex skin replacement, membrane use in dentistry, hemostatic material, artificial membrane for engineering of blood vessels, covering in nerve surgery, dura mater prosthesis, arterial stent coating, scaffolds for bone and cartilage regeneration and even more [8].
The BC conforms fully to green chemistry principles, which fits well with the objectives of the circular economy, including the minimization and reuse of waste as a feedstock, and pointing out on the importance of engaging more research efforts for BC production and adaptation towards high-value markets such as the medical market, Ref. [9]. Together with the unique combination of properties that fit well with the requirements of tailor-made medical products, these are the main reasons for the interest in BC that has grown rapidly over the past decade, as shown by the trend line of publications for the period 2010–2020 (Figure 2).
The aim of the present review is therefore to emphasise the role of BC not as a single material but as a large platform for material development in the biomedical field, focusing on published data from the last decade (2010–2020).

2. BC Modifications and Compounding

Structural compactness derive from small size of voids (pores) within BC network, degradation resistance (particularly in vivo) and lack of bioactivity are among the major limitations of native BC when more specific medical applications are considered. In the latter case, native BC is not sufficient as a stand-alone material, for which various physic-chemical, mechanical and biosynthetic modification routes have been proposed, using (multi) functional polymers, solvents, and particles that introduced new or elicit the superior properties over their plain BC counterparts. Detailed reviews describing the most efficient modification routes have recently been published by Gorgieva and Trček [8].
The microstructure, morphology and composition of BC product can be modified at the stage of biosynthesis, known as in situ modification. The attractive forces and interactions between the BC polysaccharide chains, i.e., Van der Waals forces and intermolecular hydrogen bonds, can be adjusted by simple addition of specific agents or particles. The latter affects the arrangement and composition of the amorphous and crystalline regions, determining the crystallinity profile and microstructure of resulting BC product. Lv et al. [10] fabricate two-layer nanofibrous material using the potato starch (PS) granules in order to interrupt and disassemble dense nanofiber net, formed at liquid–air interface during static culturing. This creates larger voids within the fibre network (Figure 3). Resulting membrane was seeded with the muscle cells on top, creating a biomaterial candidate for the reconstruction of hollow organs, including blood vessels, intestine, bladder and oesophagus.
BC fibre formation is influenced by the culture media (carbon and nitrogen source), culturing conditions (temperature and pH), degree of aeration, stirring rate, and cultivation time. As previously mentioned, the presence of additives can significantly alter and adjust the quality and ultimate properties of BC product [11]. It was observed that under agitated conditions, BC forms as irregular grains, star-shaped and fibrous strands, and also have a tendency to form highly branched, cross-linked structures [12]. In a paper by Fijałkowski et al. [13] the BC product was obtained under rotating magnetic field; resulting product demonstrate lower density, higher water absorption capacity, and significantly reduced microfibrils association compared to the unexposed control. A rotating magnetic field significantly increased the amount of wet cellulose particles obtained, but reduced the weight and thickness of dry cellulose. Gao et al. recently described [14] a new way of BC modification by modifying its building block, i.e., glucose. Before use in the culture medium, the glucose was derivatised using highly fluorescent compound (i.e., 6-carboxyfluorescein, 6CF) and used as a new substrate for fermentation with K. sucrofermentans. The fluorescence intensity of final product was found linearly dependant and adjustable with the concentration of the 6CF-modified glucose in the culture medium. Bianjing et al. [15] show the inclusion of fluoride ions during the biosynthesis of BC and investigate their influence on BC yield, morphology and other properties. A decrease in yield but an increase in Young’s modulus, retention of crystallinity and a significant change in morphology were demonstrated. The mechanism underlying the effect on BC processing is H-bone acceptor action of fluoride ion, which competes with the hydroxyl and acetal oxygen atoms of cellulose. Same keeps the polysaccharide chains on distance to the extent that cellulose network breaks down, while strong ion-dipole interactions are formed between the fluoride and cellulose hydroxyls.
Ultrasonic treatment of BC membranes is ex situ, post-synthetic modification pathway, which, beside physical properties (e.g., roughness), also affects the temperature of pyrolysis onset, shifting the value from 208 °C to 250–268 °C, Ref. [16]. Same type of treatment was found to be a potentially attractive approach for increasing the viscosity, mechanical properties, and swelling capacity of BC. In a study by Paximada et al. Ref. [17], BC suspensions were treated with ultrasound at a frequency of 20 kHz, a final nominal power of 82 W and different periods (0–5 min). The longer periods (5 min) increase the crystallinity of the cellulose and the entangled fibrils, while a short treatment (1 min) was advantageous for the BC suspensions, as the fibrils could be reduced to half of their initial value due to their collapse.
To induce their biodegradability BC nanofibrils were modified by means of gamma irradiation. Study by Darwis et al. [18] show that an irradiated BC membrane with dose of 25 kGy and 50 kGy immersed in a simulated body fluid (SBF) solution, reached 18% and 25% weight loss in 6 months period, in contrast to a degradation resistant, non-irradiated BC. Gamma irradiation significantly affects the tensile strength, particularly after immersion in the SBF solution, mainly due to loosening of the fibril network and the release of small molecular weight fractions.
BC demonstrate very low degradation rate in vivo. The main reason behind is high crystallinity of BC, as well as absence of the cellulose degrading enzymes in human body to carry out the hydrolysis on β-(1, 4) glycosidic bonds. BC implants show only slow, non-enzymatic hydrolysis [19], which depends on the chemical components of a main chain and side groups, the state of aggregation and morphology, the hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance, the surface and other factors. This is advantageous for certain applications, but restricts the use in native form when applications in regenerative medicine are intended. Oxidation by sodium periodate [20], nitrogen dioxide [21], or immobilization of the enzyme cellulase [22] are among the reported approaches to trigger the biodegradation of BC, where final degradation product (i.e., glucose) is considered harmless, which is ideal for bioresorbable purposes in many medical applications.
The chemical modifications of BC utilise the abundant hydroxyl groups, as typical for all cellulosic materials and same include oxidation, etherification, esterification, carbamation and amidation (Figure 4), all resulting in formation of reactive functional and charged groups, such as sulfate, carboxyl, aldehyde, phosphate, amino and thiol groups. Among all, the acetylated BC attract significant interest as non-cytotoxic material for cosmetic products, disinfectants, as well as a platform for further coupling (e.g., drugs, bioactives), for use in drug delivery.
The ‘nanofication’ of BC, as recently introduced term in review of Choi et al. [24], comprises the downstream BC processing by acid, enzymes and ionic liquids, used to transform the long nanofibrils into nano-sized particles with higher crystallinity than initial BC product. The processing of BC crystals is usually performed by acid hydrolysis (hydrochloric acid, sulphuric acid, phosphoric and hydrobromic acids), wherein, similarly to the formation of nanocrystals from plant cellulose, the amorphous regions are hydrolysed. By this, hydrolytic cleavage of glycosidic bonds is enhanced, thereby releasing individual crystallites from the remaining intact crystalline regions of high acid resistance. Such crystal-like forms of BC have been identified as more convenient for drug delivery formulations, e.g., nucleic acid delivery systems (Figure 5) [25].
BC can be suspended by mechanical means and further mixed with hydrocolloids. Examples are guar gum and HA, where the resulting bio nanocomposite films have been further coated with collagen to induce their bioactivity and render them unusable for medical applications, such as wound dressings, scaffolds for regenerative medicine and systems for drug delivery and sustained release) [26].
The biological ‘inertness’ of BC may arise as an issue in certain applications where bioactivity is required; the absence of bioactivity means the absence of cell recognition units to attract (human) cells to attach; but it also means the absence of any active function vis-à-vis an organism, which may also be desirable, such as antimicrobial activity. The combination with materials of choice, e.g., bio- and synthetic polymers and inorganic compounds, is a general approach to elicit certain functions for a targeted application, as shown in Table 1.

3. BC In Vitro/In Vivo Biocompatibility and Biomedical Applications

Biocompatibility in the broadest sense refers to ‘the ability of a biomaterial to perform its intended function in relation to a medical therapy without causing adverse or systemic effects in the recipient or beneficiary of that therapy, but to produce the most appropriate beneficial cellular or tissue response in that specific situation and to optimise the clinically relevant performance of the therapy’ [56].
Because of the combination of exceptional properties offered within a single material, such as ultra-high purity, low coefficient of friction, appropriate surface topography, chemistry and hydrophilicity, BC-based materials are widely used in biomedical applications [22]. BC is generally considered non-cytotoxic in vitro as well as non-immunogenic [23]. According to a review by Petersen and Gatenholm [57] the biocompatibility of BC can be attributed to its similarity to collagen in term of fibril diameter (~100 nm) and assembling mode, i.e., extracellular synthesis out of monomer precursors into long polymer chains. Another advantage is that BC can be purified to rich endotoxin levels below 20 (endotoxin units/device), as approved limit for implant by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Ref. [58] For medical applications, ‘generally accepted as safe’ (GRAS) certification by the FDA is required. The GRAS status is often restricted for bacterial biopolymers (as BC), mainly because of the presence of host cell-derived contaminants, such as endotoxins, which negatively affect product quality.
Numerous studies demonstrate the compatibility of BC with various human cells that can grow and multiply in the presence of BC, such as smooth muscle cells [10], chondrocytes [59], fibroblasts [60], keratinocytes [61], osteoblasts [62], human umbilical vein endothelial cells [63], bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) [64], adipose-derived MSCs [65] etc. The BC potency to stimulate collagen-I formation by MSCs was identified by multiphoton microscopy [66]. The seeded MSCs adhered rapidly and firmly and grew into multilayers, demonstrating the ability of BC to stimulate MSCs for osteogenic differentiation.
Some modifications even improve cell affinity and viability; grafting of a carboxymethyl group on BC improves the initial cell adhesion and also causes a reduced inflammatory response in vivo, Ref. [67]. Scaffolds based on BC and BC/hyaluronic acid (HA) or gelatin (GEL) have been investigated in contact with human pulp stem cells. Confocal microscopy images demonstrate well distributed and adhered cells on both (BC/HA and BC/GEL) type of scaffolds, demonstrating potential for stem cell therapy [68].
Group of Fu et al. [69] synthesised BC films by 7 days static culturing in 24 and 96-well plates. The cell evaluation studies clearly demonstrate better proliferation and adhesion of mouse embryonic fibroblasts (NIH/3T3 line) cultivated on their surfaces, in comparison with control group. The in vivo studies performed on large skin areas showed faster tissue regeneration in BC group, with moderate inflammation reaction, being localised to epithelial tissues.
The group of Pertile et al. [70] found that BC calcified under long-term in vivo exposure. In the same study, the implanted BC caused a mild, benign and declining inflammatory response, which did not induce a foreign body reaction, while four months after implantation, intracellular accumulation of BC nanofibers in subcutaneous foamy macrophage aggregates was observed. Degree of calcification was directly related to the porosity of the material and the duration of exposure. It was speculated that such undesirable fate of implanted biomaterial, may also depend on the tissue type into which the biomaterial is implanted.

3.1. BC in Wound Dressing

The light and transparent native BC membrane, offer extraordinary combination of mechanical properties with a stress–strain behaviour similar to soft tissue, such as skin, which makes this material very perspective for such applications, as already summarised in several reviews [71,72,73]. The easy of inspection (due to its transparency), pain relief effect, reduction of infection with exudate retention capacity, reduced healing time, adherence to the wound and easy removal after improved epithelialisation, are some of superior properties BC over the conventional dressings. BC dressings form a dense physical barrier against microbial contamination and additional injury, while allowing gas exchange. BC is also flexible and can adapt to the contour of a wound, reducing the risk of harmful microbial contamination. They are available in any size and shape, and even large wounds can be covered with a single membrane.
An interesting feature of BC membranes is that they interact differently with wounded and intact skin. Indeed, the segment that comes into contact with intact skin dries out and forms a thin cellophane-like layer that adheres to the outermost layer of the epidermis (stratum corneum). On the other hand, the central membrane segment in contact with the wound remains moist, thus preventing maceration of the skin around the wound caused by long-term exposure to moist dressings. Using a microfluidic-based in vitro wound healing model, Ying et al. [74] showed that the underside of the BC film can better promote cell migration to facilitate wound healing. In addition, the full-thickness skin wounds of Wistar rats showed that the wound covered by the underside of the BC film had a faster healing rate and a lower inflammatory response compared to gauze and the top of the BC film.
Wound healing consists of complex cellular and biochemical events that can be divided into several overlapping stages, i.e., homeostasis, inflammatory response, cell proliferation and synthesis of the extracellular matrix and the posterior period—maturation or remodelling Ref. [75]. Typically, there are five types of wounds: abrasions, lacerations, punctures, lacerations and burns [76] and in almost all types, wound exudates contain elevated levels of reactive oxygen species, cytokines and proteolytic enzymes. Presence of exudates reduced the concentration of proteinase inhibitors and growth factors, leading to tissue degradation and disruption of inflammatory phase, as well as whole healing cascade. Further one, the optimal wound dressing should provide a moist environment (for improved re-epithelisation and reduced scarring), absorb exudates during the inflammatory phase, act as a barrier to infection and fluid loss, cover the wound lightly and tightly and allow the delivery of drug or medication to the wound bed. Water holding capacity, water release rate and water vapour transmission rate are among the most important quantitative physical parameters important for use as a wound dressing and are strongly dependent on available surface area, pore size distribution, etc. [77].
In a study of Moraes et al. [78], a wound dressing based on BC/collagen hydrogel was compared with commercial collagenase ointment, both applied on rat dorsum wound. The composite hydrogel was found to promote better wound healing than collagenase and the control group. Khan et al. [79] recently reported preparation of highly microporous, surface-modified, BC scaffolds for skin regeneration, wherein round shaped GEL microspheres prepared with a water-in-oil emulsion method were used as porogen for porosity improvement.
BC doped with resveratrol was prepared by group of Meng et al. [80], as a wound healing dressing. This polyphenolic compound, naturally found in red grape skins, red wine, peanuts, cranberries and other fruits, is reported to have low toxicity and is well tolerated in humans. The same was found to highly regulate endothelial nitric oxide synthase and vascular endothelial growth factor and promotes angiogenesis in wound healing experiments. 3D shaped, BC/resveratrol scaffolds preserved the normal collagen bundling pattern and induced re-epithelialization in defective rat epidermis, suggesting that the material provides a biocompatible environment for stem cell attachment and growth and promotes epithelial regeneration during wound healing.
BC and copolymer of 3-hydroxybutyric acid and 4-hydroxybutyric acid—a biodegradable polymer of microbial origin was combined in a hybrid dressing [81]. Two groups of hybrid membranes were investigated: BC loaded with a drug that promotes wound healing (actovegan), and BC colonised with epidermal cells different from multipotent MSCs. The in vitro study showed that the most effective scaffolds for fibroblast growth were composite BC-based films loaded with actovegin. In vivo tests using an animal model with third-degree skin burns showed a higher efficiency of both hybrids compared to a commercial wound dressing.
In the work of Khamrai et al. [82] BC was ionically modified using 2-(methacryloyloxy) ethyltrimethylammonium chloride (PMTAC) and poly (sodium 4-vinylbenzene sulfonate) (PSS) as positively and negatively charged polymers, respectively. Modified BC was further incorporated into a GEL-based composite hydrogel, where the interlocking network was formed by the ionic interaction with the oppositely charged, modified BC. The hydrogel patch was loaded with curcumin, which enabled the wound healing activity, which was investigated with the NIH 3 T3 fibroblast cell line. The same patch exhibits antimicrobial activity and self-healing capacity.
Recent clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of BC wound dressing in human burn wounds. Compared with other commercial wound dressing products, the BC-based Biofill demonstrate efficient pain relief and reduction in postoperative discomfort, faster healing, lack of scarring as well as high time- and cost efficiency of the whole clinical treatment. In addition, Biofill protects the wound from infection and is permeable to fluids and gases and acts as a suitable artificial skin. Other products from the same (BioFill, Brazil) company are Dermafill, BioProcess and Nexfill. Xylos Corporation (Langhorne, PA, USA) is another manufacturing company with XCell and Prima CelTM products used as a wound dressing for venous ulcer wounds that promote autolytic debridement, relieve pain and accelerate granulation. Technical University of Lodz develop and marketed two known brands, namely CelMatC and CelMatMG. Polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB)-supplemented BC (Suprasorb X+ PHMB) is a commercial product of the company Activa Healthcare, L&R Company (Needwood Burton on Trent, United Kingdom), which is marketed as a wound dressing that can be used in moderately exuding, infected or critically colonised wounds. Ref. [83] Membracel is a commercial product of the company Vuelo Pharmathat and is marketed as a temporary skin replacement for ulcers, burns and lacerations. Ref. [84] Nanoderm and Nanoderm Ag from Axcelon Biopolymers Corp (Ontario, Canada). are antimicrobial dressings that prevent infections; Nanoskin from Innovatec, which is intended to be used as a blood vessel substitute; and Linfatics, lesions of the glume, facial peeling, infectious dermolysis, abrasion of tattoos and chronic ulcers, which allow the release of gases while inhibiting the entry of microorganisms. EpiProtect® is a product of S2Medical AB (Linköping, Sweden), which has recently been used to heal paediatric patients with burns [85].

3.2. Antimicrobial Activity in BC

BC provide physical barrier that can reduce the penetration of bacteria into the tissue, however, in its native form do not offer any antimicrobial action. To elicit bioactivity towards different bacteria, various modification routs have been proposed or specific compounds have been added to deliver BC products, especially wound dressings, with antimicrobial and/or anti-inflammatory properties. The antibacterial BC composites can be prepared in situ by adding partially deacetylated chitosan nanocrystals to the culture medium or by post-synthetic modification and mixing of both suspensions [86].
The integration of antibiotics into BC dressings is a most common approach. In the work of Laçin [87], the antibiotic chloramphenicol was integrated into oxidised BC membranes, resulting in a prolonged antimicrobial effect and improved adhesion and proliferation of fibroblasts. In the work of Ye et al. [88], the BC sponge was formed by grafting amoxicillin onto regenerated BC, which provide antibacterial activity against Gram+ and Gram- bacteria without toxicity to host cells. Group of Rouabhia [89] prepare gentamicin-activated BC membranes by chemical grafting of arginine-glycine-aspartic acid-cysteine (RGDC) peptides, and using the coupling agent 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane. Resulting gentamicin-RGDC-grafted BC membranes, were found non-toxic to human skin fibroblasts and provide a bactericidal effect against Streptococcus mutans. In a study by Junka et al. [90], BC saturated with gentamicin show prolonged antibiotic release and significantly reduce the levels of biofilm-forming pathogens, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, resulting in low in vitro cytotoxicity to osteoblast cell lines.
In addition to the antibiotics inclusion, the chemical modification of BC can ensure prolonged antimicrobial activity and serve as an alternative method for activating the structure against immune-reactive bacteria, without the addition of exogenous components Ref. [71]. The chemical grafting of aminoalkyl groups onto the surface of their BC network as a mimetic structure for chitosan was investigated in study of Fernandes et al. Ref. [91]. The BC-NH2 membranes obtained were lethal to Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli and non-toxic to MSCs derived from human adipose tissue. Another efficient examples for BC are the introduction of multicationic triazine benzyl groups [92], the introduction of functional hydrophobic sites on the BC surface, etc.
Recent work by Wang et al. [93] has demonstrated the covalent transplantation of the photosensitiser Hypocrellin onto BC. The results showed a 99.5 % reduction of Staphylococcus aureus under illumination, while no statistically significant inactivation of Escherichia coli was observed. The latter was inactivated by potentiation by 99.1% (2 log units). Potassium iodide is due to short-lived reactive iodide radicals, which are the most important biocidal agents. Indirect cytotoxicity tests using mouse skin fibroblast cells (L929) showed no changes in cell viability, indicating a lack of leachable components (e.g., unreacted coupling agent or hypocrellin) that could be cytotoxic to mammalian cells. A study by Vismara et al. [94] describes the manufacture of BC-based wound dressings in which BC has been modified by grafting glycidyl methacrylate crosslinked with ethylene glycol dimethacrylate through a Fenton-type radical process involving the generation of carbon-cantered cellulose radicals that are trapped by methacrylate structures. Modified BC was further loaded with antimicrobial agents, vancomycin and ciprofloxacin, which limit colonization by Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae.
In Maneering’s work [95] the BC membranes were immersed in silver nitrate solution and then the silver ions (Ag+) were reduced to Ag0 by sodium borohydride. The impregnated BC membranes were then freeze-dried; material demonstrate strong activity against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Similar findings were shown by the introduction of copper sulfate into BC enriched with alginate and chitosan [96]. In the work of Ataide [97] BC was immersed in a sterilised bromelain solution and incubated for 24 h at room temperature. Bromelin is a protease found in pineapple pulp and is used in medicine for its anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties, promotion of cell apoptosis, etc. Interestingly, the antimicrobial activity of bromelin increased after its incorporation in BC membranes: in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the bromelain-releasing solution MIC was six times higher than the original solution MIC, while in Staphylococcus aureus, the bromelain-releasing solution MIC was 12 times higher than the original solution MIC.
A mussel mimetic transdermal patch was prepared from carboxylated BC and dopamine (DOPA) by amidation reaction. BC/DOPA patch provide antimicrobial action against both Gram+ (Staphylococcus aureus and Lysinibacillus fusiformis) and Gram- (Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) bacteria. The in vitro wound healing tests, utilising NIH 3T3 cell line and the human lung epithelial cell line A549 show that the presence of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) and Ag nanoparticles in the composite film further accelerates the wound healing process [98].

3.3. BC as Blood Brain Barrier (Bbb) Model

The BBB is a dynamic barrier in the brain that protects the brain from toxic substances arriving from the bloodstream. As such, plays an important role in maintaining homeostasis in the central nervous system. Because of its neuroprotective function, the BBB is also an obstacle for various drugs for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases and brain tumours to enrich the central nervous system from the bloodstream. This is of particular interest for the pre-development of in vitro models of the BBB, especially due to its animal-free concept.
The use of the BC in this area is not very common, even its use as a basement membrane is a promising approach, because of low (non) degradability of BCunder culturing conditions and its nano-porosity (200 nm), which allows cell attachment while preventing cells from changing compartments. In recent work by Bayir et al. [99], unmodified BC has been used as a reliable basement membrane for BBB models in pharmaceutical research (Figure 6). Measurements of transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER) show that the BC membrane leads to statistically higher TEER values than the standard PET Transwell insert membrane. Validation of the model was performed with sucrose and caffeine, whose permeability values are close to the in vivo values.

3.4. BC in Dentistry

BC is a mucoadhesive, flexible and soft material, which makes it a good candidate for dental applications. BC can be used as a wound dressing for the palate in mucosal grafts or as a cover for extraction sockets [100] and can also be used as a temporary implant in dental extraction sockets or as a membrane for guided tissue regeneration [77].
In dental implant and prosthetic dentistry, the preservation of residual alveolar bone volume after tooth loss is critical, but is often compromised by infections, external injuries, and other lesions. Gengiflex® (a product of Biofill, Brazil) is used in the treatment of periodontal defects. Gengiflex® consists of two layers: The inner membrane is made of BC, which makes the membrane rigid, while the outer membrane is chemically modified from alkali cellulose. After Gengiflex® therapy, a complete improvement of the bony defect around a TiAl6V4 implant was reported, but incomplete bone growth was observed in injuries covered with Gengiflex® membranes, resulting in pores and low bone density.
Studies by Weyell et al. [100] have demonstrated the benefits of doxycycline-loaded hydrated and freeze-dried BC in dental therapies such as tooth extraction or mucosal grafting, where the periodate oxidation was investigated towards the modified degradation profile. In addition, native and oxidised doxycycline-loaded BC were tested for infection prophylaxis, with release studies of the drug confirming a comparative biphasic release behaviour.
Group of Jinga [101] showed that the presence of BC nanowhiskers accelerates the curing processes of mineral trioxide aggregate cements, resulting in composites suitable for endodontic application. The same group combined BC powder with silicate cement powder for sustained cell survival and promoted cell proliferation in vitro, demonstrating its potential for application in dentistry [102].
In our recent work [20], we combine BC with GEL to form asymmetric membranes by successive periodate oxidation and a freeze-thaw/carbodiimide crosslinking process, which allows first a Schiff reaction between the respective aldehyde and hydroxyl groups and later GEL stabilisation and microstructuring. The membranes produced no cytotoxic effects on human fibroblasts, MRC-5 cells, maintained their morphology in direct contact with the membrane, adhered to the GEL porous site while not adhering to the thinly GEL-coated BC side, showed beneficial properties for possible applications of guided tissue regeneration as required in periodontal treatment.

3.5. BC in Cartilage, Bone and Osteochondral Regeneration

In bone tissue engineering, ceramics, metals, polymers and composites are most frequent materials of choice. The ceramics, such as hydroxyapatite (HAp) and calcium phosphates (CaP) are most widely used because of their osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties, which are, however, associated with brittleness and low mechanical stability. Metals (e.g., titanium) are biocompatible, but there is increasing concern about dissolved/released metal particles and ions that cause inflammatory reactions around the implant. In particular, the inflammatory cytokine tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) is expressed in the adjacent bone when a titanium implant is used [103]. Synthetic polymers, such as poly (ε-caprolactone), poly (lactic acid), poly (glycolic acid) and their copolymers, poly (carbonates) and poly (anhydrides) are often used as tailor-made precursors, with natural polymers, proteins and polysaccharides also playing an important role in this area.
The mechanical properties of BC give it its use as filler and mechanical enhancer in hard tissue regeneration applications. The elastic modulus of BC, measured by atomic force microscopy was reported to reach 78 GPa and by Raman spectroscopy for individual BC fibres the 114 GPa, which becomes lower when BC foils are measured (their elastic modulus was reported to be in the range of 15–35 GPa), Ref. [104]. Since BC is considered to be collagen mimetic, the mineralised phase HAp or another CaP component is often added by three general methods: (i) In situ cultivation of CaPs in culture media; (ii) ex situ synthesis of CaPs in BC fibres or physical mixing of the two materials; and (iii) synthesis of BC composite from BC solution [61].
The main limitation of BC in bone regeneration is its high density and nanoporosity, which limits cell infiltration. Zaborovska et al. [105] reported on the production of porous BC by introducing 300–500 μm paraffin micro particles during the biosynthesis process. If the macroporous BC was colonised with MC3T3-E1 osteoprogenitor cells, clustering of the cells within the pores and denser mineral deposition occurred as in the control surfaces of the BC. The same approach was used by Andersson, using wax particles of 150–300 µm. Joint chondrocytes from young adult patients and neonatal joint chondrocytes penetrated the pores and multiplied, producing glycosaminoglycan (GAG) in the clustered regions [59]. In order to be used as a reinforcement phase as a single nanofiber instead of nanofibrilar network, the BC was broken down by microfluidisation and ultrasound and the chain aggregation was additionally stabilised by CMC polymer. [106]
Pigossi et al. [45] reported on the preparation of BC-HAp composites associated with osteogenic growth peptide (OGP) or pentapeptide OGP (10–14) and their use for bone regeneration in critical size calvarial defects in mice. Three days after operation, the specific bone markers (Runx2, Tnfrsf11b and Bglap) were upregulated by membranes containing the peptides, suggesting an acceleration of osteoblastic differentiation as well as activity. After 60 and 90 days a high percentage of bone formation was observed for membranes based on BC-HAp and BC-HAp OGP (10–14).
In the study by Coelho et al. [107], the BC membrane was associated with HAp and an antibody against bone morphogenetic proteins (anti-BMP-2) (BC-HAp-anti-BMP-2), which do not demonstrate any toxicity, genotoxicity and mutagenicity. The release kinetics of the anti-BMP-2 antibodies detected in vitro gradually reduces the antibody levels so that they decrease by about 70% in 7 days and by about 90% in 14 days. BC-HAp-anti-BMP-2 increased the expression of several genes involved in bone repair, increased mineralization nodules and levels of alkaline phosphatase activity.
In the work of Zhu [108], BC was used for the treatment of osteochondral defects (particularly for the cartilage segments) by incorporating BC into a double-network hydrogel system of two interpenetrating polymer networks consisting of γ-glutamic acid, lysine and alginate. The results show that the compression modulus of the resulting hydrogel (0.322 MPa) was comparable to that of natural articular cartilage. Martinez et al. [109] demonstrate the efficacy of two-layer BC scaffolds consisting of a dense BC layer and a macroporous nanocellulose/alginate layer for osteochondral regeneration, whereby the scaffold is colonised with human nasoseptal chondrocytes (NC) and cultivated in vitro for up to 6 weeks. Formed two-layer BC scaffolds have a porosity of 75% and an average pore size of 50 ± 25 μm, were non-pyrogenic (0.15 ± 0.09 EU/mL) and non-cytotoxic (cell viability: 97.8 ± 4.7%), provide good mechanical stability and maintain structural integrity. Importantly, they provide a suitable environment for cultured NCs and a combination of isolated NCs and MNCs for cartilage formation in vitro and in vivo.

3.6. BC in Drug Delivery

BC’s high purity, biocompatibility and unique structural and mechanical properties, as well as its ability to adhere to irregular skin surfaces and high skin tolerance are significant attributes for topical drug delivery systems, Ref. [110]. An important advantage is its high temperature stability, which facilitates its sterilisation by autoclaving. BC has been utilised for administration of antibiotics to the wounds, molecularly imprinted polymeric matrix systems for the enantioselective administration of drugs, support in transdermal drug administration and absorption of residues, administration agents in the treatment of dental canals, as matrices and capsule shells for oral drug administration, protein administration in the colon, etc. However, its highly porous structure can hardly resist the free movement of gasses, solvents and other small molecules, which makes native BC an unsuitable biopolymer for controlled drug delivery. The specific chemical modifications are essential to achieve its conversion into the efficient drug delivery cargo [111].
In the work of Narh et al. [112] inulin was introduced into the fructose permeates of the bacterial strain Gluconacetobacter xylinus to synthesise empty cellulose pockets for the storage of drugs. BC/CMC biocomposites with varying degrees of substitution (from 0.7 to 1.2) were loaded with methotrexate (MTX) as an alternative for the topical treatment of psoriasis, Ref. [33]. Study suggests that degree of substitution in CMC is a key factor in modulating BC properties and drug release. Composite films of the same composition crosslinked with citric acid were prepared by solution casting and loaded with ibuprofen sodium salt as a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug with also analgesic and antipyretic effects, Ref. [113]. Acetylated freeze-dried BC was found to efficiently encapsulate both, the poorly water-soluble drug famotidine and the highly water-soluble drug tizinidine [111]. BC and alginate were mixed by an ex situ method with Ag sulfadiazine payload. Loading BC-alginate scaffolds with varying amounts of doxorubicin reduced the cell viability of the HT-29 human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line compared to free dox from about 95 to 53% after 24 h and from 63% to 37% after 48 h, demonstrating the potential for cancer therapies in solid tumours. BC-alginate coacervate films were loaded with doxorubicin by an absorption mechanism. Strong interaction between BC and alginate, creating a highly interpenetrating biopolymeric network that contributes to an improved inclusion and loading capacity of hydrophilic doxorubicin. Other examples of drugs loaded into BC or BC-based composites are bovine serum albumin [114], caffeine, lidocaine, ibuprofen and diclofenac [115], levofloxacin [116], propranolol [117], etc.
Group of Chen et al. [118] develops multifunctional core-shell hybrid microfibers by combining coaxial spinning with a microfluidic device and subsequent dip coating, which contain a hydrogel core of BC and a conductive polymer shell layer of poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene). A diclofenac sodium, was introduced as model drug into the core layer of the microfibers during the synthesis process and its release was enhanced by external electrical stimulation. The resulting hybrid microfibers exhibit a well-controlled microscopic morphology, improved mechanical properties, excellent biocompatibility and electroactivity for PC12 cell cultures, suggesting a potential application for the reconstruction of electrically responsive tissues that mimic muscle fibres or nerve networks.

3.7. Other Applications of BC

Mesh for hernia treatment. An ideal mesh used in hernia repair must meet several requirements: long-term biocompatibility, mechanical stability with low shrinkage, resistance to infection and seroma formation, avoidance of adhesions and fistulas, and the lowest possible hernia recurrence rate. Recent preclinical studies in Wistar rats with different models of ventral hernia show encapsulation and moderate inflammation, but because of the presence of undesirable adhesions and structural instability and shrinkage of the mesh, future modifications were identified as necessary [119]. In a study of Piasecka-Zelga et al. [120] the bio-modified mesh was formed on commercial polypropylene (PP) mesh coated on one or both sides with chitosan-modified BC. Modified BC and PP fabric were well integrated because of the pre-irradiation of the PP fabric with UV. After implantation, the PP-BC composite mesh induces the least immune reaction to the surrounding tissue, effectively induces tissue remodelling, does not induce allergic or intradermal reactions or pathological changes in internal organs, indicating a better performance than the commercial PP mesh.
In the work of Wang et al. [121], the BC was identified as a promising candidate for the prevention of postoperative epidural fibrosis and adhesion. The membrane consisted of BC and exosomes of human umbilical cord MSCs, and these show no cytotoxicity in vivo and no inhibitory effect on epidural fibrosis and peridural adhesion.
Artificial cornea. BC’s high light transmission, favourable mechanical properties, ability to withstand surgical sutures and intraocular pressure, and biocompatibility make it a potential candidate for a scaffold for keratoplasty. Keratoplasty is a widely used technique for replacing damaged corneas, often associated with side effects such as xerophthalmia, corneal neovascularization, donor shortage and graft rejection. The work of Jia [122] demonstrate that corneal stroma cells can be preserved, grow and proliferate on BC scaffolds [123].
In the work of Zhang et al. [124], the biocompatibility of BC as a scaffold for corneal stroma replacement was investigated using rabbit corneal epithelial and stroma cells cultured on BC; the in vivo test confirmed the optical transparency in 3 month study, elucidating the BC potential in this area.
Vascular grafts. Because of its good mechanical strength (a burst pressure of up to 880 mmHg) and blood compatibility, BC was used also for artificial tubes, which can be used as a potential replacement of small (4 mm) or large (6 mm) vascular grafts. Commercial product BASYC® was developed in tubular form directly during cultivation with the aim of developing biomaterials that can be used as coatings in experimental micronerve surgery and as artificial blood vessel interplants with an inner diameter of about 1 mm, Ref. [125]. In addition to artificial blood vessels, BASYC® alone or loaded with a neuroregenerative drug has also shown promising results regarding tissue innervation in animal models after neurosurgical interventions.
In order to improve compliance of BC tubes for use as vascular grafts, poly (vinyl alcohol) (PVA) was introduced into the BC tubes, improving mechanical properties and water permeability. Ref. [126] The BC/PVA composite demonstrate good hemocompatibility with low platelet and factor XII activation and as such is a candidate for cardiac prostheses, Ref. [127]. BC/heparin composite as a mimetic of the natural ECM has been proposed to improve the blood compatibility and regenerative capacity of BC. In the work of Wang et al. [128], a BC-chitosan/heparin composite was prepared and MC3T3-E1 cells were seeded on the obtained samples to test cell compatibility. The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide results showed that the BC-chitosan/heparin composites were suitable for cell proliferation and ingrowth.
Biosensors. Derikvand et al. [129] elaborated a versatile, chemo-enzymatic approach for activation of BC by simple copper (I)-catalysed azide-alkyne cycloaddition ‘click chemistry’ to develop new fluorogen esterase sensors. The facile aqueous modification was identified to facilitate wide applicability to cellulose papers, gauze and hydrogels. Linking the released fluorophore to the cellulose surface prevents signal degradation, allowing highly sensitive and simple visualisation (Figure 7a).
Group of Lv et al. [130] developed a self-powered biosensor using a glucose oxidase-based bioanode and a laccase-based biocathode decorated with multi-walled carbon nanotubes of carboxyl groups and a BC electrode modified with gold nanoparticles (Figure 7b). Experimental results showed that BC 3D network stability would be a very promising support for self-powered biosensors. Yao et al. [131] demonstrated the processing of colour tuneable luminescent macrofibers based on BC nanofibers loaded with CdTe quantum dots by wet spinning. The fluorescence intensity of the enzyme-modified microfibers was highly sensitive to the glucose concentration; their flexibility allows the conversion into a woven structure, which offers a great potential for the development of portable sensor devices.
The magnetic BC was evaluated as a magnetic hydrogel patch in the blood vessel, which was inserted with a stent to seal the neuro-endovascular cavity and normalise blood flow. A similar hydrogel was evaluated to improve the problems observed in the interaction of metallic biomaterials (replaced joints, metal plates and stents) and blood. These magnetic hydrogels and their derivatives, together with immobilised drugs, may be potential candidates for surface coating/printing of metallic implant surfaces, or applied to other drug delivery implants to minimise rejection and immune reactions [132].
The biphasic Janus hydrogels present conducting BC polymer hydrogels with double network that combine electro-activity with biocompatibility in the same device, Ref. [133]. They can act as an interface between biology and device, empowering creation of implantable devices for personalised and regenerative medicine. Electroactive hydrogels were prepared using BC and conductive polymer deposited on the surface of the BC hydrogel. The electrical conductivity gives the composites the ability to react to voltage and current and the BC hydrogel layer provides good biocompatibility, biodegradability, bio adhesion and mass transport properties. Such a system could enable selective biological functions such as molecular recognition and specific catalysis as well as the study of the complex genetic and molecular mechanisms.
Artificial kidneys and dialysis. BC-graphen oxide (GO) composite hydrogels with excellent water stability, tensile strength, as well as improved toughness and discrepant permeation properties for various inorganic/organic ions of different sizes are presented by work of Shi et al. Ref. [134]. Composite membrane demonstrate capacity for very fast ions separation, opening up applications such as artificial kidneys and dialysis, which require precise separation of large and small molecules/ions.
Photodynamic therapy in cancer treatment. Conductive BC/polyaniline mixtures have received increasing attention in the scientific community not only for electronic applications but also for the development of novel electro-responsive drug delivery mechanisms, Ref. [135]. A physical dehydration method was used for the inclusion of the photosensitiser C60, which is used for photodynamic therapy in cancer treatment, successfully incorporating nanoparticles and distributing them evenly in the hyperfine BC network (Figure 8) [136].

4. BC Prospects and Challenges

The BC is fully in line with the principles of green chemistry, which fits well with the objectives of the circular economy, which include the minimization and reuse of waste as a raw material, and points out the importance of increasing research efforts for BC production and adapting to high-value markets such as the medical market. As a high-purity biological nonwoven, BC has gained interest in the medical field for more than 30 years, where it is used as a simple biotextile for bandaging to advanced skin replacement, hemostatic and dental membrane, material for artificial blood vessels, covering in nerve surgery, dura mater prostheses, arterial stent coating, cartilage and bone implants [8].
Since the first documented use of BC in biomedicine by a Brazilian company in 1986, which discussed the applications of Biofill® as skin replacement for burns and ulcers, extensive studies have been conducted on BC and its full application potential in tissue engineering has been gradually realised. BC composites go far beyond their original form (BC) and are developing into advanced technological solutions for applications ranging from drug delivery to tissue engineering. Through compounding, surface modifications or simple mixing with other components, the inertness of the BC is improved, thus increasing its medical potential. The growing interest in BC composites offers great potential for improving the current production of biomedical materials for future regenerative medicine for the diagnosis and cure of various diseases. Although BC is considered biocompatible and non-toxic, the final composites and their degradation products need to be carefully examined, especially in translational research where strict regulations must be strictly adhered to ensure human health and safety.


Research core program group for Textile Chemistry No. P2-0118, and project BI-HR/20-21-00, financed by the Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS).

Conflicts of Interest

The author declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Moradali, M.F.; Rehm, B.H.A. Bacterial biopolymers: From pathogenesis to advanced materials. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 195–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tayeb, A.; Amini, E.; Ghasemi, S.; Tajvidi, M. Cellulose Nanomaterials—Binding Properties and Applications: A Review. Molecules 2018, 23, 2684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Abol-Fotouh, D.; Hassan, M.A.; Shokry, H.; Roig, A.; Azab, M.S.; Kashyout, A.E.H.B. Bacterial nanocellulose from agro-industrial wastes: Low-cost and enhanced production by Komagataeibacter saccharivorans MD1. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Vigentini, I.; Fabrizio, V.; Dellacà, F.; Rossi, S.; Azario, I.; Mondin, C.; Benaglia, M.; Foschino, R. Set-Up of Bacterial Cellulose Production From the Genus Komagataeibacter and Its Use in a Gluten-Free Bakery Product as a Case Study. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Trček, J.; Barja, F. Updates on quick identification of acetic acid bacteria with a focus on the 16S–23S rRNA gene internal transcribed spacer and the analysis of cell proteins by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 196, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Slapšak, N.; Cleenwerck, I.; De Vos, P.; Trček, J. Gluconacetobacter maltaceti sp. nov., a novel vinegar producing acetic acid bacterium. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 36, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brown, R.M. The biosynthesis of cellulose. Top. Catal. 1987, 1, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gorgieva, S.; Trček, J. Bacterial cellulose: Production, modification and perspectives in biomedical applications. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Maleš, L.; Fakin, D.; Bračič, M.; Gorgieva, S. Efficiency of Differently Processed Membranes Based on Cellulose as Cationic Dye Adsorbents. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lv, X.; Yang, J.; Feng, C.; Li, Z.; Chen, S.; Xie, M.; Huang, J.; Li, H.; Wang, H.; Xu, Y. Bacterial Cellulose-Based Biomimetic Nanofibrous Scaffold with Muscle Cells for Hollow Organ Tissue Engineering. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 2, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dufresne, A. Nanocellulose: From Nature to High Performance Tailored Materials; Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2012; ISBN 3110254603. [Google Scholar]
  12. Esa, F.; Tasirin, S.M.; Rahman, N.A. Overview of Bacterial Cellulose Production and Application. Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia 2014, 2, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fijałkowski, K.; Zywicka, A.; Drozd, R.; Niemczyk, A.; Junka, A.F.; Peitler, D.; Kordas, M.; Konopacki, M.; Szymczyk, P.; Fray, M.E.; et al. Modification of bacterial cellulose through exposure to the rotating magnetic field. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 133, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gao, M.; Li, J.; Bao, Z.; Hu, M.; Nian, R.; Feng, D.; An, D.; Li, X.; Xian, M.; Zhang, H. A natural in situ fabrication method of functional bacterial cellulose using a microorganism. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sun, B.; Zhang, L.; Wei, F.; AL-Ammari, A.; Xu, X.; Li, W.; Chen, C.; Lin, J.; Zhang, H.; Sun, D. In situ structural modification of bacterial cellulose by sodium fluoride. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 231, 115765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Tischer, P.C.S.F.; Sierakowski, M.R.; Westfahl, H.; Tischer, C.A. Nanostructural reorganization of bacterial cellulose by ultrasonic treatment. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11, 1217–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Paximada, P.; Dimitrakopoulou, E.A.; Tsouko, E.; Koutinas, A.A.; Fasseas, C.; Mandala, I.G. Structural modification of bacterial cellulose fibrils under ultrasonic irradiation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 150, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Darwis, D.; Khusniya, T.; Hardiningsih, L.; Nurlidar, F.; Winarno, H. In-vitro Degradation Behaviour of Irradiated Bacterial Cellulose Membrane. Atom Indones. 2013, 38, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Czaja, W.K.; Young, D.J.; Kawecki, M.; Brown, R.M. The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gorgieva, S.; Hribernik, S. Microstructured and Degradable Bacterial Cellulose–Gelatin Composite Membranes: Mineralization Aspects and Biomedical Relevance. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Peng, S.; Zheng, Y.; Wu, J.; Wu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Song, W.; Xi, T. Preparation and characterization of degradable oxidized bacterial cellulose reacted with nitrogen dioxide. Polym. Bull. 2012, 68, 415–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hu, Y.; Catchmark, J.M. Integration of cellulases into bacterial cellulose: Toward bioabsorbable cellulose composites. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2011, 97 B, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Foresti, M.L.; Vázquez, A.; Boury, B. Applications of bacterial cellulose as precursor of carbon and composites with metal oxide, metal sulfide and metal nanoparticles: A review of recent advances. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 157, 447–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Choi, S.M.; Shin, E.J. The Nanofication and Functionalization of Bacterial Cellulose and Its Applications. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Singhsa, P.; Narain, R.; Manuspiya, H. Bacterial Cellulose Nanocrystals (BCNC) Preparation and Characterization from Three Bacterial Cellulose Sources and Development of Functionalized BCNCs as Nucleic Acid Delivery Systems. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2018, 1, 209–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Woehl, M.A.; Ono, L.; Riegel Vidotti, I.C.; Wypych, F.; Schreiner, W.H.; Sierakowski, M.R. Bioactive nanocomposites of bacterial cellulose and natural hydrocolloids. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 7034–7044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Noh, Y.K.; Dos Santos Da Costa, A.; Park, Y.S.; Du, P.; Kim, I.H.; Park, K. Fabrication of bacterial cellulose-collagen composite scaffolds and their osteogenic effect on human mesenchymal stem cells. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 219, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhang, W.; Wang, X.C.; Li, X.Y.; Zhang, L.L.; Jiang, F. A 3D porous microsphere with multistage structure and component based on bacterial cellulose and collagen for bone tissue engineering. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 236, 116043–116051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Osorio, M.; Ortiz, I.; Gañán, P.; Naranjo, T.; Zuluaga, R.; van Kooten, T.G.; Castro, C. Novel surface modification of three-dimensional bacterial nanocellulose with cell-derived adhesion proteins for soft tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 100, 697–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lin, W.-C.; Lien, C.-C.; Yeh, H.-J.; Yu, C.-M.; Hsu, S. Bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose–chitosan membranes for wound dressing applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 94, 603–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yuan, H.; Chen, L.; Hong, F.F. A Biodegradable Antibacterial Nanocomposite Based on Oxidized Bacterial Nanocellulose for Rapid Hemostasis and Wound Healing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 3382–3392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yadav, V.; Paniliatis, B.J.; Shi, H.; Lee, K.; Cebe, P.; Kaplan, D.L. Novel in vivo-degradable cellulose-chitin copolymer from metabolically engineered gluconacetobacter xylinus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 6257–6265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. De Lima Fontes, M.; Meneguin, A.B.; Tercjak, A.; Gutierrez, J.; Cury, B.S.F.; dos Santos, A.M.; Ribeiro, S.J.L.; Barud, H.S. Effect of in situ modification of bacterial cellulose with carboxymethylcellulose on its nano/microstructure and methotrexate release properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 179, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wei, J.; Wang, B.; Li, Z.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, M.; Sheng, N.; Liang, Q.; Wang, H.; Chen, S. A 3D-printable TEMPO-oxidized bacterial cellulose/alginate hydrogel with enhanced stability via nanoclay incorporation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 238, 116207–116217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lopes, T.D.; Riegel-Vidotti, I.C.; Grein, A.; Tischer, C.A.; de Sousa Faria-Tischer, P.C. Bacterial cellulose and hyaluronic acid hybrid membranes: Production and characterization. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 67, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jia, Y.; Huo, M.; Huang, H.; Fu, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Jia, S. Preparation and characterization of bacterial cellulose/hyaluronic acid composites. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part N J. Nanoeng. Nanosyst. 2015, 229, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. De Olyveira, G.M.; dos Santos, M.L.; Daltro, P.B.; Basmaji, P.; de Cerqueira Daltro, G.; Guastaldi, A.C. Bacterial cellulose/chondroitin sulfate for dental materials scaffolds. J. Biomater. Tissue Eng. 2014, 4, 150–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Azarniya, A.; Tamjid, E.; Eslahi, N.; Simchi, A. Modification of bacterial cellulose/keratin nanofibrous mats by a tragacanth gum-conjugated hydrogel for wound healing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 134, 280–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Luo, H.; Ao, H.; Li, G.; Li, W.; Xiong, G.; Zhu, Y.; Wan, Y. Bacterial cellulose/graphene oxide nanocomposite as a novel drug delivery system. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2017, 17, 249–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shao, W.; Liu, H.; Liu, X.; Wang, S.; Zhang, R. Anti-bacterial performances and biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose/graphene oxide composites. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 4795–4803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Si, H.; Luo, H.; Xiong, G.; Yang, Z.; Raman, S.R.; Guo, R.; Wan, Y. One-Step In Situ Biosynthesis of Graphene Oxide-Bacterial Cellulose Nanocomposite Hydrogels. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2014, 35, 1706–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Khalid, A.; Ullah, H.; Ul-Islam, M.; Khan, R.; Khan, S.; Ahmad, F.; Khan, T.; Wahid, F. Bacterial cellulose-TiO2 nanocomposites promote healing and tissue regeneration in burn mice model. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 47662–47668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pal, S.; Nisi, R.; Stoppa, M.; Licciulli, A. Silver-Functionalized Bacterial Cellulose as Antibacterial Membrane for Wound-Healing Applications. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 3632–3639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Duarte, E.B.; das Chagas, B.S.; Andrade, F.K.; Brígida, A.I.S.; Borges, M.F.; Muniz, C.R.; Souza Filho, M.d.S.M.; Morais, J.P.S.; Feitosa, J.P.A.; Rosa, M.F. Production of hydroxyapatite–bacterial cellulose nanocomposites from agroindustrial wastes. Cellulose 2015, 22, 3177–3187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pigossi, S.C.; de Oliveira, G.J.P.L.; Finoti, L.S.; Nepomuceno, R.; Spolidorio, L.C.; Rossa, C.; Ribeiro, S.J.L.; Saska, S.; Scarel-Caminaga, R.M. Bacterial cellulose-hydroxyapatite composites with osteogenic growth peptide (OGP) or pentapeptide OGP on bone regeneration in critical-size calvarial defect model. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2015, 103, 3397–3406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Basu, P.; Saha, N.; Alexandrova, R.; Saha, P. Calcium phosphate incorporated bacterial cellulose-polyvinylpyrrolidone based hydrogel scaffold: Structural property and cell viability study for bone regeneration application. Polymers (Basel) 2019, 11, 1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Busuioc, C.; Ghitulica, C.D.; Stoica, A.; Stroescu, M.; Voicu, G.; Ionita, V.; Averous, L.; Jinga, S.I. Calcium phosphates grown on bacterial cellulose template. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 9433–9441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ul-Islam, M.; Khan, T.; Park, J.K. Nanoreinforced bacterial cellulose–montmorillonite composites for biomedical applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 89, 1189–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Khodamoradi, N.; Babaeipour, V.; Sirousazar, M. Bacterial cellulose/montmorillonite bionanocomposites prepared by immersion and in-situ methods: Structural, mechanical, thermal, swelling and dehydration properties. Cellulose 2019, 26, 7847–7861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Velichko, E.V.; Buyanov, A.L.; Saprykina, N.N.; Chetverikov, Y.O.; Duif, C.P.; Bouwman, W.G.; Smyslov, R.Y. High-strength bacterial cellulose–polyacrylamide hydrogels: Mesostructure anisotropy as studied by spin-echo small-angle neutron scattering and cryo-SEM. Eur. Polym. J. 2017, 88, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yuan, N.; Xu, L.; Zhang, L.; Ye, H.; Zhao, J.; Liu, Z.; Rong, J. Superior hybrid hydrogels of polyacrylamide enhanced by bacterial cellulose nanofiber clusters. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 67, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rapid Synthesis of Superabsorbent Smart-Swelling Bacterial Cellulose/Acrylamide-Based Hydrogels for Drug Delivery. Available online: (accessed on 4 May 2020).
  53. Foong, C.Y.; Hamzah, M.S.A.; Razak, S.I.A.; Saidin, S.; Nayan, N.H.M. Influence of Poly(lactic acid) Layer on the Physical and Antibacterial Properties of Dry Bacterial Cellulose Sheet for Potential Acute Wound Healing Materials. Fibers Polym. 2018, 19, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Leitão, A.F.; Silva, J.P.; Dourado, F.; Gama, M. Production and characterization of a new bacterial cellulose/poly(Vinyl Alcohol) nanocomposite. Materials (Basel). 2013, 6, 1956–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Mohamad, N.; Loh, E.Y.X.; Fauzi, M.B.; Ng, M.H.; Mohd Amin, M.C.I. In vivo evaluation of bacterial cellulose/acrylic acid wound dressing hydrogel containing keratinocytes and fibroblasts for burn wounds. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2019, 9, 444–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Black, J. Biological Performance of Materials: Fundamentals of Biocompatibility; CRC Taylor & Francis: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006; ISBN 0849339596. [Google Scholar]
  57. Petersen, N.; Gatenholm, P. Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: Current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 91, 1277–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Guidance for Industry: Pyrogen and Endotoxins Testing: Questions and Answers | FDA. Available online: (accessed on 13 April 2020).
  59. Andersson, J.; Stenhamre, H.; Bäckdahl, H.; Gatenholm, P. Behavior of human chondrocytes in engineered porous bacterial cellulose scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2010, 94, 1124–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Taokaew, S.; Phisalaphong, M.; Newby, B.M.Z. Modification of bacterial cellulose with organosilanes to improve attachment and spreading of human fibroblasts. Cellulose 2015, 22, 2311–2324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sanchavanakit, N.; Sangrungraungroj, W.; Kaomongkolgit, R.; Banaprasert, T.; Pavasant, P.; Phisalaphong, M. Growth of Human Keratinocytes and Fibroblasts on Bacterial Cellulose Film. Biotechnol. Prog. 2006, 22, 1194–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hu, Y.; Catchmark, J.M.; Vogler, E.A. Factors Impacting the Formation of Sphere-Like Bacterial Cellulose Particles and Their Biocompatibility for Human Osteoblast Growth. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 3444–3452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Feil, G.; Horres, R.; Schulte, J.; Mack, A.F.; Petzoldt, S.; Arnold, C.; Meng, C.; Jost, L.; Boxleitner, J.; Kiessling-Wolf, N.; et al. Bacterial cellulose shifts transcriptome and proteome of cultured endothelial cells towards native differentiation. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2017, 16, 1563–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Vadaye Kheiry, E.; Parivar, K.; Baharara, J.; Fazly Bazzaz, B.S.; Iranbakhsh, A. The osteogenesis of bacterial cellulose scaffold loaded with fisetin. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2018, 21, 965–971. [Google Scholar]
  65. Souza, C.M.C.O.; Mesquita, L.A.F.; Souza, D.; Irioda, A.C.; Francisco, J.C.; Souza, C.F.; Guarita-Souza, L.C.; Sierakowski, M.-R.; Carvalho, K.A.T. Regeneration of Skin Tissue Promoted by Mesenchymal Stem Cells Seeded in Nanostructured Membrane. Transplant. Proc. 2014, 46, 1882–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Vielreicher, M.; Kralisch, D.; Völkl, S.; Sternal, F.; Arkudas, A.; Friedrich, O. Bacterial nanocellulose stimulates mesenchymal stem cell expansion and formation of stable collagen-I networks as a novel biomaterial in tissue engineering. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Acasigua, G.; Olyveira, G.; Costa, L.; Braghirolli, D.; Fossati, A.; Guastaldi, A.; Pranke, P.; Daltro, G.; Basmaji, P. Novel Chemically Modified Bacterial Cellulose Nanocomposite as Potential Biomaterial for Stem Cell Therapy Applications. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2014, 9, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Bäckdahl, H.; Helenius, G.; Bodin, A.; Nannmark, U.; Johansson, B.R.; Risberg, B.; Gatenholm, P. Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 2006, 27, 2141–2149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Fu, L.; Zhou, P.; Zhang, S.; Yang, G. Evaluation of bacterial nanocellulose-based uniform wound dressing for large area skin transplantation. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2013, 33, 2995–3000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pértile, R.A.N.; Moreira, S.; Gil Da Costa, R.M.; Correia, A.; Guardão, L.; Gartner, F.; Vilanova, M.; Gama, M. Bacterial cellulose: Long-term biocompatibility studies. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2012, 23, 1339–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sulaeva, I.; Henniges, U.; Rosenau, T.; Potthast, A. Bacterial cellulose as a material for wound treatment: Properties and modifications: A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015, 33, 1547–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kucińska-Lipka, J.; Gubanska, I.; Janik, H. Bacterial cellulose in the field of wound healing and regenerative medicine of skin: Recent trends and future prospectives. Polym. Bull. 2015, 72, 2399–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Anton-Sales, I.; Beekmann, U.; Laromaine, A.; Roig, A.; Kralisch, D. Opportunities of Bacterial Cellulose to Treat Epithelial Tissues. Curr. Drug Targets 2018, 20, 808–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Li, Y.; Wang, S.; Huang, R.; Huang, Z.; Hu, B.; Zheng, W.; Yang, G.; Jiang, X. Evaluation of the Effect of the Structure of Bacterial Cellulose on Full Thickness Skin Wound Repair on a Microfluidic Chip. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16, 780–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Gonzalez, A.C.D.O.; Andrade, Z.D.A.; Costa, T.F.; Medrado, A.R.A.P. Wound healing—A literature review. An. Bras. Dermatol. 2016, 91, 614–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Velnar, T.; Bailey, T.; Smrkolj, V. The wound healing process: An overview of the cellular and molecular mechanisms. J. Int. Med. Res. 2009, 37, 1528–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Portela, R.; Leal, C.R.; Almeida, P.L.; Sobral, R.G. Bacterial cellulose: A versatile biopolymer for wound dressing applications. Microb. Biotechnol. 2019, 12, 586–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. De Sousa Moraes, P.R.F.; Saska, S.; Barud, H.; De Lima, L.R.; Da Conceicao Amaro Martins, V.; De Guzzi Plepis, A.M.; Ribeiro, S.J.L.; Gaspar, A.M.M. Bacterial cellulose/collagen hydrogel for wound healing. Mater. Res. 2016, 19, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Khan, S.; Ul-Islam, M.; Ikram, M.; Islam, S.U.; Ullah, M.W.; Israr, M.; Jang, J.H.; Yoon, S.; Park, J.K. Preparation and structural characterization of surface modified microporous bacterial cellulose scaffolds: A potential material for skin regeneration applications in vitro and in vivo. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 117, 1200–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Meng, E.; Chen, C.L.; Liu, C.C.; Liu, C.C.; Chang, S.J.; Cherng, J.H.; Wang, H.H.; Wu, S.T. Bioapplications of bacterial cellulose polymers conjugated with resveratrol for epithelial defect regeneration. Polymers (Basel) 2019, 11, 1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Volova, T.G.; Shumilova, A.A.; Nikolaeva, E.D.; Kirichenko, A.K.; Shishatskaya, E.I. Biotechnological wound dressings based on bacterial cellulose and degradable copolymer P(3HB/4HB). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 131, 230–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Khamrai, M.; Banerjee, S.L.; Paul, S.; Samanta, S.; Kundu, P.P. Curcumin entrapped gelatin/ionically modified bacterial cellulose based self-healable hydrogel film: An eco-friendly sustainable synthesis method of wound healing patch. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 122, 940–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Suprasorb X+PHMB – L&R Medical (Lohmann & Rauscher UK, formerly Activa Healthcare). Available online: (accessed on 5 May 2020).
  84. Membracel—Membrana Regeneradora Porosa | Vuelo PharmaVuelo Pharma. Available online: (accessed on 5 May 2020).
  85. Delli Santi, G.; Borgognone, A. The use of Epiprotect®, an advanced wound dressing, to heal paediatric patients with burns: A pilot study. Burn. Open 2019, 3, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Butchosa, N.; Brown, C.; Larsson, P.T.; Berglund, L.A.; Bulone, V.; Zhou, Q. Nanocomposites of bacterial cellulose nanofibers and chitin nanocrystals: Fabrication, characterization and bactericidal activity. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 3404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Laçin, N.T. Development of biodegradable antibacterial cellulose based hydrogel membranes for wound healing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 67, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Ye, S.; Jiang, L.; Wu, J.; Su, C.; Huang, C.; Liu, X.; Shao, W. Flexible Amoxicillin-Grafted Bacterial Cellulose Sponges for Wound Dressing: In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 5862–5870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rouabhia, M.; Asselin, J.; Tazi, N.; Messaddeq, Y.; Levinson, D.; Zhang, Z. Production of Biocompatible and Antimicrobial Bacterial Cellulose Polymers Functionalized by RGDC Grafting Groups and Gentamicin. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 1439–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Junka, A.; Bartoszewicz, M.; Dziadas, M.; Szymczyk, P.; Dydak, K.; Żywicka, A.; Owczarek, A.; Bil-Lula, I.; Czajkowska, J.; Fijałkowski, K. Application of bacterial cellulose experimental dressings saturated with gentamycin for management of bone biofilm in vitro and ex vivo. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2020, 108, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Fernandes, S.C.M.; Sadocco, P.; Alonso-Varona, A.; Palomares, T.; Eceiza, A.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Mondragon, I.; Freire, C.S.R. Bioinspired antimicrobial and biocompatible bacterial cellulose membranes obtained by surface functionalization with aminoalkyl groups. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 3290–3297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Hou, A.; Zhou, M.; Wang, X. Preparation and characterization of durable antibacterial cellulose biomaterials modified with triazine derivatives. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009, 75, 328–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wang, T.; Xu, L.; Shen, H.; Cao, X.; Wei, Q.; Ghiladi, R.A.; Wang, Q. Photoinactivation of bacteria by hypocrellin-grafted bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 2020, 27, 991–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Vismara, E.; Bernardi, A.; Bongio, C.; Farè, S.; Pappalardo, S.; Serafini, A.; Pollegioni, L.; Rosini, E.; Torri, G. Bacterial nanocellulose and its surface modification by glycidyl methacrylate and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate. Incorporation of vancomycin and ciprofloxacin. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1668–1690. [Google Scholar]
  95. Maneerung, T.; Tokura, S.; Rujiravanit, R. Impregnation of silver nanoparticles into bacterial cellulose for antimicrobial wound dressing. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 72, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wichai, S.; Chuysinuan, P.; Chaiarwut, S.; Ekabutr, P.; Supaphol, P. Development of bacterial cellulose/alginate/chitosan composites incorporating copper (II) sulfate as an antibacterial wound dressing. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2019, 51, 662–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ataide, J.A.; De Carvalho, N.M.; Rebelo, M.D.A.; Chaud, M.V.; Grotto, D.; Gerenutti, M.; Rai, M.; Mazzola, P.G.; Jozala, A.F. Bacterial Nanocellulose Loaded with Bromelain: Assessment of Antimicrobial, Antioxidant and Physical-Chemical Properties. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Khamrai, M.; Banerjee, S.L.; Paul, S.; Ghosh, A.K.; Sarkar, P.; Kundu, P.P. A Mussel Mimetic, Bioadhesive, Antimicrobial Patch Based on Dopamine-Modified Bacterial Cellulose/rGO/Ag NPs: A Green Approach toward Wound-Healing Applications. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 12083–12097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Bayir, E.; Celtikoglu, M.M.; Sendemir, A. The use of bacterial cellulose as a basement membrane improves the plausibility of the static in vitro blood-brain barrier model. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 126, 1002–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Weyell, P.; Beekmann, U.; Küpper, C.; Dederichs, M.; Thamm, J.; Fischer, D.; Kralisch, D. Tailor-made material characteristics of bacterial cellulose for drug delivery applications in dentistry. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 207, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Jinga, S.I.; Voicu, G.; Stoica-Guzun, A.; Stroescu, M.; Grumezescu, A.M.; Bleotu, C. Biocellulose Nanowhiskers Cement Composites for Endodontic USE. Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostruct. 2014, 9, 543–550. [Google Scholar]
  102. Voicu, G.; Jinga, S.I.; Drosu, B.G.; Busuioc, C. Improvement of silicate cement properties with bacterial cellulose powder addition for applications in dentistry. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 174, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Lechner, J.; Noumbissi, S.; von Baehr, V. Titanium implants and silent inflammation in jawbone—a critical interplay of dissolved titanium particles and cytokines TNF-α and RANTES/CCL5 on overall health? EPMA J. 2018, 9, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Abeer, M.M.; Mohd Amin, M.C.I.; Martin, C. A review of bacterial cellulose-based drug delivery systems: Their biochemistry, current approaches and future prospects. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2014, 66, 1047–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Zaborowska, M.; Bodin, A.; Bäckdahl, H.; Popp, J.; Goldstein, A.; Gatenholm, P. Microporous bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2010, 6, 2540–2547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Andrade, F.K.; Morais, J.P.S.; Muniz, C.R.; Nascimento, J.H.O.; Vieira, R.S.; Gama, F.M.P.; Rosa, M.F. Stable microfluidized bacterial cellulose suspension. Cellulose 2019, 26, 5851–5864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Coelho, F.; Cavicchioli, M.; Specian, S.S.; Scarel-Caminaga, R.M.; Penteado, L.d.A.; Medeiros, A.I.d.; Ribeiro, S.J.d.L.; Capote, T.S.d.O. Bacterial cellulose membrane functionalized with hydroxiapatite and anti-bone morphogenetic protein 2: A promising material for bone regeneration. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0221286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Zhu, X.; Chen, T.; Feng, B.; Weng, J.; Duan, K.; Wang, J.; Lu, X. Biomimetic Bacterial Cellulose-Enhanced Double-Network Hydrogel with Excellent Mechanical Properties Applied for the Osteochondral Defect Repair. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 4, 3534–3544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Martínez Ávila, H.; Feldmann, E.M.; Pleumeekers, M.M.; Nimeskern, L.; Kuo, W.; de Jong, W.C.; Schwarz, S.; Müller, R.; Hendriks, J.; Rotter, N.; et al. Novel bilayer bacterial nanocellulose scaffold supports neocartilage formation invitro and invivo. Biomaterials 2015, 44, 122–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Shoseyov, O.; Kam, D.; Ben Shalom, T.; Shtein, Z.; Vinkler, S.; Posen, Y. Nanocellulose Composite Biomaterials in Industry and Medicine; Springer: Cham, Switzerland; Basel, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 693–784. [Google Scholar]
  111. Badshah, M.; Ullah, H.; Khan, A.R.; Khan, S.; Park, J.K.; Khan, T. Surface modification and evaluation of bacterial cellulose for drug delivery. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 113, 526–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Narh, C.; Charles, F.; Mensah, A.; Qufu, W. Synthesis of highly stable bacterial cellulosic pocket for drug storage. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 206, 625–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Juncu, G.; Stoica-Guzun, A.; Stroescu, M.; Isopencu, G.; Jinga, S.I. Drug release kinetics from carboxymethylcellulose-bacterial cellulose composite films. Int. J. Pharm. 2016, 510, 485–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ahmad, N.; Amin, M.C.I.M.; Mahali, S.M.; Ismail, I.; Chuang, V.T.G. Biocompatible and mucoadhesive bacterial cellulose-g-poly(acrylic acid) hydrogels for oral protein delivery. Mol. Pharm. 2014, 11, 4130–4142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Silva, N.H.C.S.; Mota, J.P.; Santos de Almeida, T.; Carvalho, J.P.F.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Vilela, C.; Rosado, C.; Freire, C.S.R. Topical Drug Delivery Systems Based on Bacterial Nanocellulose: Accelerated Stability Testing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Cacicedo, M.L.; Islan, G.A.; Drachemberg, M.F.; Alvarez, V.A.; Bartel, L.C.; Bolzán, A.D.; Castro, G.R. Hybrid bacterial cellulose-pectin films for delivery of bioactive molecules. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 7457–7467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Bodhibukkana, C.; Srichana, T.; Kaewnopparat, S.; Tangthong, N.; Bouking, P.; Martin, G.P.; Suedee, R. Composite membrane of bacterially-derived cellulose and molecularly imprinted polymer for use as a transdermal enantioselective controlled-release system of racemic propranolol. J. Control. Release 2006, 113, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Chen, C.; Chen, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, L.; Li, C.; Dai, B.; Yang, J.; Liu, J.; Sun, D. Electrically-responsive core-shell hybrid microfibers for controlled drug release and cell culture. Acta Biomater. 2017, 55, 434–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Rauchfuß, F.; Helble, J.; Bruns, J.; Dirsch, O.; Dahmen, U.; Ardelt, M.; Settmacher, U.; Scheuerlein, H. Biocellulose for incisional hernia repair—an experimental pilot study. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Piasecka-Zelga, J.; Zelga, P.; Szulc, J.; Wietecha, J.; Ciechańska, D. An in vivo biocompatibility study of surgical meshes made from bacterial cellulose modified with chitosan. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 116, 1119–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Wang, B.; Li, P.; Shangguan, L.; Ma, J.; Mao, K.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Mao, K. A novel bacterial cellulose membrane immobilized with human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosome prevents epidural fibrosis. Int. J. Nanomedicine 2018, 13, 5257–5273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Jia, H.; Jia, Y.; Wang, J.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Jia, S. Potentiality of bacterial cellulose as the scaffold of tissue engineering of cornea. In Proceedings of the 2009 2nd International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, BMEI 2009, Tianjin, China, 17–19 October 2009. [Google Scholar]
  123. Picheth, G.F.; Pirich, C.L.; Sierakowski, M.R.; Woehl, M.A.; Sakakibara, C.N.; de Souza, C.F.; Martin, A.A.; da Silva, R.; de Freitas, R.A. Bacterial cellulose in biomedical applications: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 104, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Zhang, C.; Cao, J.; Zhao, S.; Luo, H.; Yang, Z.; Gama, M.; Zhang, Q.; Su, D.; Wan, Y. Biocompatibility evaluation of bacterial cellulose as a scaffold material for tissue-engineered corneal stroma. Cellulose 2020, 27, 2775–2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Klemm, D.; Schumann, D.; Udhardt, U.; Marsch, S. Bacterial synthesized cellulose-Artificial blood vessels for microsurgery. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2001, 26, 1561–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Tang, J.; Bao, L.; Li, X.; Chen, L.; Hong, F.F. Potential of PVA-doped bacterial nano-cellulose tubular composites for artificial blood vessels. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 8537–8547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Leitão, A.F.; Gupta, S.; Silva, J.P.; Reviakine, I.; Gama, M. Hemocompatibility study of a bacterial cellulose/polyvinyl alcohol nanocomposite. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2013, 111, 493–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Wang, J.; Wan, Y.; Huang, Y. Immobilisation of heparin on bacterial cellulose-chitosan nano-fibres surfaces via the cross-linking technique. IET Nanobiotechnology 2012, 6, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Derikvand, F.; Yin, D.L.T.; Barrett, R.; Brumer, H. Cellulose-Based Biosensors for Esterase Detection. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 2989–2993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Lv, P.; Zhou, H.; Mensah, A.; Feng, Q.; Wang, D.; Hu, X.; Cai, Y.; Amerigo Lucia, L.; Li, D.; Wei, Q. A highly flexible self-powered biosensor for glucose detection by epitaxial deposition of gold nanoparticles on conductive bacterial cellulose. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 351, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Yao, J.; Ji, P.; Wang, B.; Wang, H.; Chen, S. Color-tunable luminescent macrofibers based on CdTe QDs-loaded bacterial cellulose nanofibers for pH and glucose sensing. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2018, 254, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Allain, J.P.; Echeverry-Rendón, M. Surface treatment of metallic biomaterials in contact with blood to enhance hemocompatibility. In Hemocompatibility of Biomaterials for Clinical Applications: Blood-Biomaterials Interactions; Elsevier Inc.: Oxford, UK, 2018; pp. 279–326. ISBN 9780081004999. [Google Scholar]
  133. Shi, Z.; Li, Y.; Chen, X.; Han, H.; Yang, G. Double network bacterial cellulose hydrogel to build a biology-device interface. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 970–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Fang, Q.; Zhou, X.; Deng, W.; Zheng, Z.; Liu, Z. Freestanding bacterial cellulose-graphene oxide composite membranes with high mechanical strength for selective ion permeation. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Alonso, E.; Faria, M.; Mohammadkazemi, F.; Resnik, M.; Ferreira, A.; Cordeiro, N. Conductive bacterial cellulose-polyaniline blends: Influence of the matrix and synthesis conditions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 183, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Chu, M.; Gao, H.; Liu, S.; Wang, L.; Jia, Y.; Gao, M.; Wan, M.; Xu, C.; Ren, L. Functionalization of composite bacterial cellulose with C60 nanoparticles for wound dressing and cancer therapy. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 18197–18203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Macro-, micro- and molecular structure of bacterial cellulose (BC) membrane. Molecular structure image adapted from [2].
Figure 1. Macro-, micro- and molecular structure of bacterial cellulose (BC) membrane. Molecular structure image adapted from [2].
Processes 08 00624 g001
Figure 2. Trend of annual publications considering BC for 2010–2020 period. Search engine is Web of Science Core Collection and search terms (a), ‘bacterial cellulose’ (b), ‘bacterial cellulose’ AND ‘medicine’, (c) and ‘bacterial cellulose’ AND ‘medicine’ AND ‘review’.
Figure 2. Trend of annual publications considering BC for 2010–2020 period. Search engine is Web of Science Core Collection and search terms (a), ‘bacterial cellulose’ (b), ‘bacterial cellulose’ AND ‘medicine’, (c) and ‘bacterial cellulose’ AND ‘medicine’ AND ‘review’.
Processes 08 00624 g002
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of biosynthesis of BC/potato starch (PS) composites and experimental design in fabrication of tissue engineered urethra. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [10] Copyright (2016) American Chemical Society.
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of biosynthesis of BC/potato starch (PS) composites and experimental design in fabrication of tissue engineered urethra. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [10] Copyright (2016) American Chemical Society.
Processes 08 00624 g003
Figure 4. Chemical modifications of BC. Reprinted with permission from [23]. Copyright (2017) Elsevier.
Figure 4. Chemical modifications of BC. Reprinted with permission from [23]. Copyright (2017) Elsevier.
Processes 08 00624 g004
Figure 5. Processing of BC crystals by acid hydrolysis and cationic surface modification of sulfated BC by physical adsorption using amines and amine-containing polymers. Reprinted with permission from [25]. Copyright (2018) American Chemical Society.
Figure 5. Processing of BC crystals by acid hydrolysis and cationic surface modification of sulfated BC by physical adsorption using amines and amine-containing polymers. Reprinted with permission from [25]. Copyright (2018) American Chemical Society.
Processes 08 00624 g005
Figure 6. BC used as basement membrane in BBB model. Reprinted with permission from [99]. Copyright (2019) Elsevier.
Figure 6. BC used as basement membrane in BBB model. Reprinted with permission from [99]. Copyright (2019) Elsevier.
Processes 08 00624 g006
Figure 7. BC included into (a) esterase biosensor and (b) glucose oxidase biosensor. Reprinted with permission from (a) [129] and (b) [130]. Copyright (2016) American Chemical Society and (2018) Elsevier.
Figure 7. BC included into (a) esterase biosensor and (b) glucose oxidase biosensor. Reprinted with permission from (a) [129] and (b) [130]. Copyright (2016) American Chemical Society and (2018) Elsevier.
Processes 08 00624 g007
Figure 8. Physical de-hydration method for inclusion of photosensitiser C60 in BC for photodynamic therapy in cancer treatment. Reprinted with permission from [136]. Copyright (2018) The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 8. Physical de-hydration method for inclusion of photosensitiser C60 in BC for photodynamic therapy in cancer treatment. Reprinted with permission from [136]. Copyright (2018) The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Processes 08 00624 g008
Table 1. Material use in BC-based nanocomposites, the modification route and biomedical application.
Table 1. Material use in BC-based nanocomposites, the modification route and biomedical application.
MaterialBrief Description of Modification/Processing ProcedureApplicationRef
Gelatin (GEL)BC oxidation (by sodium periodate, NaIO4) and chemical coupling, followed with freeze-thawing.Guided tissue regeneration membrane[20]
Physical mixing of BC slurry and collagen solution, and subsequent freeze-drying.
Chemically modified by Malaprade and Schiff-base reactions and prepared in form of 3D microspheres.
Bone tissue-engineered scaffold[27]
Cell derived proteins after fibroblast seeding.
Soft tissue regeneration[29]
Immersion in chitosan solution, followed by freeze-drying.
Electrostatic coupling of oxidised BC with chitosan and collagen.
Antimicrobial, wound dressing
Haemostasis and wound healing
ChitinMetabolic engineering of BC for introduction of N-acetylglucosamine residues.Non specified biomedical applications[32]
Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC)1% of CMC with different degree of substitution was added during inoculation. Drug (methotrexate) was loaded by immersion, after the oven drying.Drug delivery for the topical treatment of psoriasis.[33]
AlginateMixture for 3D printing, including 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO)-oxidised BC and laponite nanoclay.Non specified biomedical application[34]
Hyaluronic acid (HA)
1% HA dispersion was added to the fermentation process at different time points (first day, third and sixth day) after the start of fermentation.
BC membrane was soaked into the solution of HA- 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC) derivative or first in HA and after in EDC.
Scaffolds for tissue engineering[35]
Chondroitin sulfateIn situ addition of chondroitin sulphate.Dental scaffold[37]
Keratin/BC mats and thermosensitive hydrogel particles (triblock copolymers conjugated with tragacanth gum) were prepared by electrospinning and electro spraying techniques.
In situ processing: filter sterilised keratin (3% w/v) was added to culturing medium; ex situ processing: keratin was impregnated on BC at concentration of 10–15 μL/cm2.
Wound healing
Skin tissue engineering
Graphene oxide (GO)
GO suspension (0.2 mg mL−1) was added to the culture medium.
Dry BC membranes were cut into small pieces and crushed by high speed homogeniser. BC/GO nanosheets composite was synthesised by a sonochemical method, and films were freeze-dried.
One-step in situ biosynthesis by adding GO suspension into the BC culture medium.
Drug delivery
Antibacterial, biomedical application
TE scaffold
Titanium dioxide (TiO2)Impregnation of BC sheets in 1% aqueous suspension of TiO2 nanoparticles; nanocomposites were used in wet or freeze-dried form.Wound dressing for burns[42]
Silver (Ag)Green synthesis of Ag nanoparticles inside the porous BC network by UV light irradiation.Wound healing[43]
Hydroxyapatite (HAp)
Alternate immersion of BC in calcium chloride (CaCl2) and sodium hydrogen phosphate (Na2HPO4) solutions.
BC pellicles were oxidised by 1 wt% sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) solution; HAp was formed in BC by alternating incubation cycles in 0.05 mol L−1 CaCl2 and 0.1 mol L−1 Na2HPO4 solutions at room temperature for 24 h in each cycle. Incorporation of osteogenic growth peptide (OGP) and pentapeptide OGP (10–14) was carried out by adsorption.
Bone tissue regeneration[44]
Calcium phosphate (CaP)
Homogenous BC suspension was prepared by grinding the BC mat in distilled water, where polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP = (0.5 g, w/v), polyethylene glycol (PEG) (1 g, w/v), agar (2 g, w/v), and glycerin (1 mL, v/v) were incorporated. CaP was add-it in the form of β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) and HAp. Cross-linking by moist heat and pressure.
BC used only as sacrificial phase: BC membranes were loaded with CaP by wet chemistry deposition and subsequently freeze-dried.
Mont-morillonite (MMT)
BC sheets were treated with 1%, 2% and 4% MMT suspensions.
Ex situ: immersion of BC membrane into MMT suspension and in situ addition into culture medium.
Non specified biomedical application[48]
BC matrices immersed into aqueous solution containing 55 wt% of acrylamide for 16 h. N,N′-methylenebisacrylamide was used as the crosslinking agent, and cobalt (III) acetate as initiator.
Non specified biomedical application[50]
In situ polymerisation of acrylamide in BC emulsion.
Bone and cartilage repair[51]
Graft polymerisation of acrylamide on BC solubilised in an sodium hydroxide (NaOH)/urea solvent system and on dispersed BC by using N,N′-methylenebisacrylamide as a crosslinker under microwave irradiation.
Oral drug delivery[52]
Poly(lactic acid) (PLA)BC sheets were dried and coated with the PLA solution, followed by loading of antiseptic benzalkonium chloride.Antimicrobial and acute wound healing[53]
Polyvinil alcohol (PVA)Purified BC membranes were immersed in a 10% PVA solution for 24 h at 80 °C, frozen at −20 °C for 24 h and thawed at room temperature in distilled water.Non specified biomedical application[54]
Acryic acid (AA)Hydrogel formed from 1% w/v BC solution was mixed with AA solution, subsequent electron beam irradiation; material have incorporated human epidermal keratinocytes and human dermal fibroblasts.Wound dressing[55]
Back to TopTop