Next Article in Journal
Multiple Criteria Decision-Making: A Novel Applications of Network DEA Model
Previous Article in Journal
A Wavelet Transform-Assisted Convolutional Neural Network Multi-Model Framework for Monitoring Large-Scale Fluorochemical Engineering Processes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Processes
Volume 8
Issue 11
10.3390/pr8111481
processes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bactericidal and Virucidal Efficacies and Safety of Puriton®

by
So-Hyeon Bok
1,†,
Min-Hee Kim
2,†,
Soon-Young Lee
1,
Chun-Sik Bae
3,
Min-Jae Lee
4,
Kwang-Ho Kim
5,* and
Dae-Hun Park
1,*
1
College of Korean Medicine, Dongshin University, Naju, Jeonnam 58245, Korea
2
Department of Forestry, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Korea
3
College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Korea
4
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Kangwon National University, Gangwon 24341, Korea
5
Kadesh, Inc., Garden Grove, CA 92841, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors equally contributed.
Processes 2020, 8(11), 1481; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8111481
Submission received: 5 October 2020 / Revised: 9 November 2020 / Accepted: 16 November 2020 / Published: 17 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmaceutical Processes)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In 2016, infectious microbes were one of the leading causes of death, especially in developing countries. Puriton® is a mineral mixture consisting of biotite, kaolinite, montmorillonite, serpentine, clinochlore, and vermiculite, and evaluated antimicrobial activity in vitro and safety in vivo. Nine pathogens and opportunistic bacteria, namely Salmonella typhimurium, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Alcaligenes faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Micrococcus luteus, Mycobacterium smegmatis, and Bacillus subtilis, and the two viruses Zika and Influenza A/Duck/MN/1525/81 were used. A 26-week oral repeated safety study of Puriton® was conducted. Puriton® suppressed the bacterial proliferation, with a minimum proliferative rate of 91.1% in B. subtilis ATCC6633. The virucidal efficacy of Puriton® against Zika virus after 4 h and 18 h of contact time was significant in all groups treated with Puriton®. Twenty-six-week repeated oral administration of Puriton® was considered safe based on physiological results, such as behavior and blood cells/chemistry, and histopathological changes in the brain, heart, kidney, liver, and lung. We concluded that Puriton® exerted bactericidal and virucidal efficacies and was safe for 26-week repeated oral administration.

1. Introduction

In May 2018, the World Health Organization reported the top 10 causes of death in 2016 [1]. Although there was a difference in economic status between developed countries and developing countries, divided as low-income countries, lower-middle-income countries, upper-middle-income countries and high-income countries, the common death causes worldwide were bacterial infections. There were several deaths causes which were directly originated by microorganisms such as malaria, tuberculosis, and diarrheal diseases. In 2012, 2195 children died every day due to infected diarrhea, more than AIDS, malaria, and measles combined [2].
Bacterial infection results from the pathogenicity of bacteria. Salmonella typhimurium [3] and Escherichia coli [4] incur foodborne outbreaks, whereas Pseudomonas aeruginosa is related to many opportunistic infectious diseases in various organs [5]. Alcaligenes faecalis, a resident flora in the gastrointestinal tract, and may cause opportunistic infections, such as chronic suppurative otitis media, peritonitis, and skin and soft tissue infection [6,7,8]. Staphylococcus aureus, a normal flora in the upper respiratory tract and skin/gut [9,10], can be pathogenic in morbid environments, causing skin infection, food poisoning, and bacteremia [11,12]. Enterococcus faecalis is found in healthy people, but can cause various infectious diseases, such as endocarditis, urinary traction infection, meningitis, and septicemia [13,14]. Micrococcus luteus exists not only on mammalian skin but also in the environment, such as in the soil, dust, water, and air; moreover, this species can cause septic shock in various disease-suffering people [15]. Mycobacterium smegmatis has been known as a non-pathogenic bacterium, but in some cases, it causes tuberculosis [16]. Bacillus subtilis is known to produce amylosin, a heat stable toxin, and B. subtilis contamination may cause an outbreak of food poisoning [17]. Microbial infections also cause an increase in metabolic disorders, such as diabetes, a trend which could be observed worldwide over last several years [18]. Defects of insulin modulation cause diabetes mellitus, and induce hyperglycemia; chronic hyperglycemia can lead to severe health problems [19].
Minerals are important elements composing organisms: they function as special constituents, such as heme in hemoglobin, co-enzymes, and regulators of the heartbeat, and they also maintain fluid balance and function in muscle contraction. Besides minerals in the body, many minerals have been used for their biological efficacies. Edible clays have been used as traditional remedies and food materials worldwide [20]. Clay can control the toxic effects of some materials such as metal and organic pollutants, and can discharge consumed toxins [21]. The biological functions of many minerals have been reported. For example, minerals play a role in the intestinal IgA production of deep-sea water organisms [22]. Natural spa minerals are known to exert analgesic effects [23]. Mineral block supplementation showed antioxidant effect and immunity increment in animals [24]. Puriton® is a mineral mixture in sterilized water at a pH of almost 7.0, is a transparent liquid type, and is used as an oral treatment.
In this study, we evaluated Puriton®’s biological efficacies, such as its antibacterial effect antiviral effect, and simultaneously its safety of repeated oral use.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Puriton® Components

Puriton® (Kadesh, Inc., Garden Grove, CA, USA) consisted of 20% biotite, 17% kaolinite, 16% montmorillonite, 12% serpentine, 8 mica, 4% clinochlore, 4% vermiculite, 3% muscovite, 2% brucite, 2% limestone, 2% illite, 1% zeolite, 1% orthoclase, and 8% other minerals in sterilized water (almost pH 7.0).

2.2. Bacterial Culture, Culturable Conditions, Virus Culture, and Cytopathic Effect (CPE) Examination

In this study, nine pathogens and opportunistic bacteria were used. Alacligenes faecalis ATCC1004, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC BAA-1744, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC29212, Micrococcus luteus ATCC9341, and Bacillus subtilis ATCC6633 were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, U.S.A.). We purchased 3 bacteria, Escherichia coli KCTC1923, Salmonella typhimurium KCTC1925, and Staphylococcus aureus KCTC1928, from the Korean Collection for Type Culture (KCTC, Jeonbuk, South Korea). Briefly, test organisms were mixed with distilled water or Puriton® (3.4 × 105~2.2 × 106 cfu/mL) which was made as liquid type under almost pH 7.0 using sterilized water for 30 min, and 10 μL mixture was loaded on to nutrient agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. After incubation, the number of bacterial colonies was counted.
Zika virus (MR766 Uganda) and Influenza A/Duck/MN/1525/81 (H5N1) virus were used in this experiment. Each virus was treated with Puriton® (1 mL) in tubes in triplicate for each time point, 4 h or 18 h. A negative control (water) and positive control (70% EtOH) were included in each replicate. One set of toxicity control tubes was prepared in the same manner without a virus. Viruses were added to the tubes for each time point (4 h and 18 h). Zika virus stock (10 μL) and H5N1 virus stock (100 μL) were added to the respective tubes and mixed thoroughly. The H5N1 virus stock had a lower titer; therefore, its volume was increased so that the highest concentration of drug tested was 90% after the addition of virus, whereas that for Zika virus was 99%. The tubes were incubated at 23 ± 3 °C for 4 h or 18 h. Following incubation, the samples were added to cell culture media at a 1:10 dilution, and serial log dilutions were performed. Diluted samples were each added to four wells of a 96-well plate, which contained 80–90% confluent Canis familiaris kidney-originated MDCK cells (NBL-2, ATCC® CCL-34™) for influenza virus and Vero 76 cells for Zika virus. Toxicity controls were diluted and plated in the same manner as described above. Half of the wells containing uninfected controls were spiked with a virus (30 CCID50/well) to monitor antiviral activity (neutralization controls). The plates were incubated at 37 ± 2 °C and 5% CO2. The cultures were scored for the presence or absence of CPE on day 3 for H5N1 and day 6 for Zika virus. The Reed–Muench method was used to determine end-point titers (50% cell culture infectious dose, CCID50) of the samples [25]. The log reduction value (LRV) of Puriton® compared to the negative control (water) was calculated.

2.3. Animal Experiment

To evaluate the safety of Puriton®, male ICR mice were purchased from SamTako Bio Korea (Osan, Korea) and acclimatized to experimental conditions for 7 days. The mice were divided into three treatment groups and treated for 26 weeks with ad libitum access to the corresponding diet and water. The treatment groups were as follows: (1) control; (2) 400 μL Puriton®; and (3) 800 μL Puriton®. All experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Chonnam National University (Approval No. CNU IACUC-YB-2018-88).

2.4. Macroscopic, Physiological, and Histopathological Evaluations

All animals were observed twice per day for physiological changes, such as changes in movement, fur color/grooming, appetite, aggression, and body weight. Dietary consumption was measured once per week. At 3 h before euthanasia, feeding was restricted and the mice were anesthetized with intraperitoneal injections of 50 mg/kg Zoletil (Virbac, Fort Worth, TX, USA). After euthanasia, all organs were observed with the naked eye to identify any morphological changes due to toxicity. Whole blood was collected via the heart, and blood chemistry (total cholesterol, high-density lipid (HDL), low-density lipid (LDL), and glucose levels) analysis was conducted using a Hemavet Multispecies Hematology System (Drew Scientific Inc., Waterbury, CT, USA) and a HUJI Dri-Chem NX500i (FUJIFILM Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) (n = 8 per group). The brain, heart, kidney, liver, and lung were collected for the evaluation of any morphological changes due to Puriton®. All organs were fixed in 10% (v/v) formaldehyde solution, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (99.9%, 90%, 80%, and 70%), and embedded in paraffin. The paraffin-embedded tissues were then sectioned (5 μm) longitudinally and stained with hematoxylin and eosin.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Group differences were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.01.

3. Results

3.1. Puriton® Controlled the Colonies of Nine Pathogenic Bacteria

Puriton® completely eliminated four bacteria: S. typhimurium KCTC1925, E. coli KCTC1923, P. aeruginosa ATCC BAA-1744, and A. faecalis ATCC1004 at 30 min after treatment, and it strongly inhibited the growth of S. aureus KCTC1928, E. faecalis ATCC29212, M. luteus ATCC9341, M. smegmatis ATCC9341, and B. subtilis ATCC6633 by 99.9%, 97.8%, 96.4%, 93.9%, and 91.1%, respectively (Table 1). Before the colonies were counted, photographs of the bacterial colonies were taken to allow qualitative observation of the bactericidal effect of Puriton® (Figure 1). Although the death rate of each bacterium was different, all of them (nine bacteria strains) were mostly controlled by Puriton®, with B. subtilis ATCC6633 showing the lowest rate of 91.1% (Figure 1E).

3.2. Puriton® Suppressed the Cytopathic Effects of Zika Virus and H5N1 Virus

Neutralization controls showed that the virus was effectively detected in the titer assay. Toxicity controls showed that titer plates were valid, and no toxicity was observed on the test plates. Virucidal results are presented in Table 2 and Table 3. For Zika virus, both 4 h and 18 h of incubation with 70% EtOH were fully effective (CCID50 of Zika virus per 100 μL was 0.7). The undiluted compound and 50% and 90% Puriton® showed effective virucidal effect after 4 h and 18 h of contact time (Table 2). The CCID50 of Zika virus per 100 μL after treatment with 50% and 90% Puriton® was 0.7 for 4 h and 18 h of incubation. For H5N1 virus, 70% EtOH was fully effective (CCID50 of H5N1 per 100 μL was 0.8 ± 0.2 for 4 h incubation and 0.7 for 18 h incubation). The undiluted Puriton® showed effective virucidal effects after 4 h and 18 h of contact times, whereas 50% Puriton® was more effective after 18 h of contact time than after 4 h of contact time. The CCID50 of H5N1 virus per 100 μL after treatment with 50% Puriton® for 4 h was 1.9 ± 0.5 (Table 3).

3.3. Puriton® Oral Administration Was Safe at under 800 μL

To evaluate the safety of Puriton®, a 26-week toxicity testing of repeated oral administration of Puriton® was conducted. The maximum dose was set as 800 μL, considering the maximum dose administered to one mouse (approximately 1000 μL). During the experiment, several safety-related factors were observed every day, namely locomotion and behavior, but body weight (Figure 2A) and food intake (or consumption, Figure 2B) were measured over several-day intervals. There was no significant change in body weight between groups. Puriton® slightly increased body weight in a dose-dependent manner, but the increase was not statistically significant. After treatment, slight differences in body weight were observed between the 800 μL Puriton® group and the other groups.
There was no difference in population of white blood cells (WBCs) between the control, 400 μL Puriton®, and 800 μL Puriton® groups (Figure 3A and Supplementary Materials). Puriton® increased the number of neutrophils in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 3B and Supplementary Materials), but did not alter the number of the other WBCs (Figure 3C,E and Supplementary Materials).
There was no difference in total cholesterol level among the groups (Figure 4A and Supplementary Materials). LDL levels were the lowest in the 400 μL Puriton® group, and there was no difference in LDL levels between the control and 800 μL Puriton® groups (Figure 4B and Supplementary Materials). HDL levels in the 800 μL Puriton® group were higher than that in the 400 μL Puriton® group (Figure 4C and Supplementary Materials). Puriton® treatment effectively suppressed blood glucose level (Figure 4D and Supplementary Materials).
To evaluate the toxicity of Puriton® on five important organs, namely the brain, heart, kidney, liver, and lungs, the organs were observed with hematoxylin and eosin staining. However, the results showed that Puriton® caused no histopathological change in these organs (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

Puriton® is a solution of mineral mixture consisting of 20% biotite, 17% kaolinite, 16% montmorillonite, 12% serpentine, 8% mica, and other minerals in saline solution. Anti-bacterial effects of biotite had been reported, such that it could remove Salmonella enterica serovar via Th1-specific responses [26]. Kaolinite is 16% of Puriton® and is widespread in the world. It has several biological efficacies, such as antibacterial effects, anti-viral effects, and detoxification [27]. Qin et al. reported that Fe3+-saturated montmorillonite could suppress bacterial activity in municipal wastewater effluents [28]. Germanium biotite has been used as a dietary material for preventing porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses [29]. Mica stimulates the activation of the immune system via activation of macrophages, lysosomes, and phagosomes [30], and can inhibit virus activation. Puriton® prevented the proliferation of nine pathogenic bacteria up to 100% and 91.1% in B. subtilis ATCC6633, and inactivated not only Zika virus (CCID50 per 100 μL was 0.7 ± 0.0 at 4 and 18 h) but also the H5N1 virus (CCID50 per 100 μL was 1.9 ± 0.5 at 4 h and <0.7 at 18 h). From the results of the 26-week toxicity testing of repeated oral administration of Puriton®, although Puriton® could influence the commensal flora of the gastrointestinal tract, we found that Puriton® treatment was not only safe, but exerted therapeutic effects, such as an immune-modulating effect (increasing the neutrophil population, Figure 3B), an LDL-suppressing effect by increasing HDL levels (Figure 4B,C), and blood glucose-controlling effects (Figure 4D).
In addition, metabolic syndromes, such as diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, inflammation, and hyperglycemia, are closely correlated with aging [31]. Dyslipidemia indicates increased LDL levels and decreased HDL levels in blood, and it may ultimately induce blood-flow dysfunction [32]. However, oral Puriton® administration exerted a dyslipidemia-modulating effect; it not only decreased LDL levels at 400 μL, but also increased HDL levels at 800 μL. Considering that the important point of dyslipidemia modulation is lower levels of LDL than HDL, Puriton® might be a candidate for effective dyslipidemia modulating. Diabetes mellitus is characterized by hyperglycemia, and Puriton® significantly decreased blood glucose level from 464.0 to 116.90 mg/dL in the control group to 101.5 ± 36.40 mg/dL in the 800 μL Puriton® group. Therefore, Puriton® may be a candidate modulator of diabetes mellitus.
Bacterial infection could lead to severe diseases of the respiratory and intestinal system; in fact, lower respiratory infection was one of the top 10 causes of death worldwide in 2016 [1]. Although synthetic antibiotics have been developed to control microorganisms, these antibiotics exhibit many adverse effects. For example, telithromycin causes visual disturbances, taste and smell disorders, severe liver damage, and loss of consciousness [33]. Moreover, hepatic side-effects [34], destruction of normal flora [35], and hazards to male fertility [36] were reported.

5. Conclusions

Considering that Puriton® exerted inhibitory effects not only on the proliferation of nine pathogenic bacteria but also on the replication of the Zika virus and H5N1 virus, we concluded that Puriton® might a candidate for functional food additives, cosmetics, and drugs with antimicrobial effect. However, in further studies the mechanisms of bactericidal and virucidal effects of Puriton® should be elucidated.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/8/11/1481/s1, S1 Dataset: Raw data for Figure 3 and Figure 4.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.-H.K. and D.-H.P.; Data curation, S.-H.B., M.-H.K., M.-J.L. and C.-S.B.; Formal analysis, S.-H.B. and S.-Y.L.; Funding acquisition, K.-H.K.; Investigation, S.-H.B., M.-H.K., S.-Y.L. and M.-J.L.; Methodology, S.-H.B., M.-H.K., S.-Y.L., C.-S.B. and M.-J.L.; Project administration, K.-H.K. and D.-H.P.; Resources, K.-H.K.; Supervision, K.-H.K. and D.-H.P.; Visualization, K.-H.K. and D.-H.P.; Writing—original draft, S.-H.B.; Writing—review and editing, K.-H.K. and D.-H.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was conducted with financial support by Kadesh, Inc.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. The Top 10 Causes of Death. Available online: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death (accessed on 16 November 2020).
  2. Global Diarrhea Burden. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/healthywater/global/diarrhea-burden.html (accessed on 16 November 2020).
  3. Omer, M.K.; Alvarez-Ordonez, A.; Prieto, M.; Skjerve, E.; Asehun, T.; Alvseike, O.A. A systematic review of bacterial foodborne outbreaks related to red meat and meat products. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2018, 15, 598–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Yang, S.C.; Lin, C.H.; Aljuffali, I.A.; Fang, J.Y. Current pathogenic Escherichia coli foodborne outbreak cases and therapy development. Arch. Microbiol. 2017, 199, 811–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gellatly, S.L.; Hancock, R.E. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: New insights into pathogenesis and host defenses. Path. Dis. 2013, 67, 159–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Bizet, J.; Bizet, C. Strains of Alacligenes faecalis from clinical material. J. Infect. 1997, 35, 167–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Filipe, M.; Reimer, A.; Matuschek, E.; Paul, M.; Pelkonen, T.; Riesbeck, K. Fluoroquinolone-resistant Alacligenes faecalis related to chronic suppurative otitis media, Angola. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2017, 23, 1740–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Tena, D.; Fernandez, C.; Lago, M.R. Alacligenes faecalis: An unusual cause of skin and soft tissue infection. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 2015, 68, 128–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Schenck, L.P.; Surette, M.G.; Bowdish, D.M. Composition and immunological significance of the upper respiratory tract microbiota. FEBS Lett. 2016, 590, 3705–3720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wollina, U. Microbiome in atopic dermatitis. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 2017, 10, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Tong, S.Y.; Davis, J.S.; Eichenberger, E.; Holland, T.L.; Fowler, V.G. Staphylococcus aureus infections: Epidermiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 28, 603–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Rasmussen, R.V.; Fowler, V.G.; Skov, R.; Bruun, N.E. Future challenges and treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia with emphasis on MRSA. Future Microbiol. 2011, 6, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Murray, B.E. The life and times of the Enterococcus. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1990, 3, 46–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hidron, A.I.; Edwards, J.R.; Patel, J.; Horan, T.C.; Sievert, D.M.; Pollock, D.A.; Fridkin, S.K. NHSN annual update: Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: Annual summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006–2007. Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidermiol. 2008, 29, 996–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Albertson, D.; Natsios, G.A.; Gleckman, R. Septic shock with Micrococcus luteus. Arch. Intern. Med. 1978, 138, 487–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Reyrat, J.M.; Kahn, D. Mycrobacterium smegmatis: An absurd model for tuberculosis? Trends Microbiol. 2001, 19, 472–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Apetroaie-Constantin, C.; Mikkola, R.; Andersson, M.A.; Teplova, V.; Suominen, I.; Johansson, T. Salkinoja-salonen M: Bacillus subtilis and B. mojavensis strains connected to food poisoning produced the heat stable toxin amylosin. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 106, 1976–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. World Health Organization: Diabetes. Diabetes Fact Sheet: 30 October 2018. Available online: https://communitymedicine4all.com/2018/11/05/who-updates-fact-sheet-on-diabetes (accessed on 16 November 2020).
  19. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2009, 32 (Suppl. 1), S62–S97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Gomes, C.S.F. Healing and edible clays: A review of basic concepts, benefits and risks. Envrion. Geochem. Health. 2018, 40, 1739–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Parisi, F.; Lazzara, G.; Merli, M.; Milioto, S.; Princivalle, F.; Sciascia, L. Simultaneous removal and recovery of metal ions and dyes from wastewater through montmorillonite clay mineral. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Shiraishi, H.; Fujino, M.; Shirakawa, N.; Ishida, N.; Funato, H.; Hirata, A.; Abe, N.; Iizuka, M.; Jobu, K.; Yokota, J.; et al. Effect of minerals on intestinal IgA production using deep sea water drinks. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2017, 40, 1700–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Hirabayashi, T.; Yamashita, M.; Wada, N.; Takenoya, F.; Ikeda, H.; Kamei, J.; Ryushi, T.; Yamamoto, N.; Shioda, S. Analgesic effect of mineral cream containing natural spa minerals for use on the skin. Biomed. Res. Tokyo 2018, 39, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Wang, H.; Liu, Z.; Huang, M.; Wang, S.; Cui, D.; Dong, S.; Li, S.; Qi, Z.; Liu, Y. Effects of long-term mineral block supplementation on antioxidants, immunity, and health of Tibetan sheep. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2016, 172, 326–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Haggett, P.; Gunawardena, K.A. Determination of population thresholds for settlement functions by the Reed-Muench method. Prof. Geogr. 2010, 16, 6–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, J.A.; Jung, B.G.; Kim, T.H.; Kim, Y.M.; Koh, H.B.; Lee, B.J. Improvement of bacterial clearance and relief of clinical signs of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection in pigs through upregulation of Th1-specific responses by administration of a combination of two silicate minerals, biotite and bentonite. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2015, 77, 1087–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Awad, M.E.; Lopez-Galindo, A.; Setti, M.; El-Rahmany, M.M.; Iborra, C.V. Kaolinite in pharmaceutics and biomedicine. Int. J. Pham. 2017, 533, 34–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Qin, C.; Chen, C.; Shang, C.; Xia, K. Fe(3+)-saturated montmorllonite effectively deactivates bacteria in wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 622–623, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Jung, B.G.; Lee, J.A.; Lee, B.J. Antiviral effect of dietary germanium biotite supplementation in pigs experimentally infected with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. J. Vet. Sci. 2013, 14, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jung, M.; Shin, M.K.; Jung, Y.K.; Yoo, H.S. Modulation of macrophage activities in proliferation, lysosome, and phagosome by the nonspecific immunostimulatory, mica. PLoS ONE. 2015, 10, e0117838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kaur, J. A comprehensive review on metabolic syndrome. Cardiol. Res. Pract. 2014, 2014, 943162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, H.H.; Li, J.J. Aging and dyslipidemia: A review of potential mechanisms. Ageing Res. Rev. 2015, 19, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Telithromycin: Review of adverse effects. Prescrire Int. 2014, 23, 264–266. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25954793/ (accessed on 16 November 2020).
  34. Westphal, J.F.; Vetter, D.; Brogard, J.M. Hepatic side-effects of antibiotics. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1994, 33, 387–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ianiro, G.; Tilg, H.; Gasbarrini, A. Antibiotics as deep modulators of gut microbiota: Between good and evil. Gut 2016, 65, 1906–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Schlegel, P.N.; Chang, T.S.; Marshall, F.F. Antibiotics: Potential hazards to male fertility. Fertil. Steril. 1991, 55, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Processes 08 01481 g001 550
Figure 1. Bactericidal effect after 30 min of Puriton® treatment. The “a” figures were before Puriton® treatment, and the “b” figures were after 30 min of Puriton® treatment. Puriton® efficiently suppresses bacterial proliferation. (A) Alcaligenes faecalis ATCC1004; (B) Enterococcus faecalis ATCC29212; (C) Mycobacterium smegmatis ATCC9341; (D) Micrococcus luteus ATCC9341; (E) Bacillus subtilis ATCC6633.
Figure 1. Bactericidal effect after 30 min of Puriton® treatment. The “a” figures were before Puriton® treatment, and the “b” figures were after 30 min of Puriton® treatment. Puriton® efficiently suppresses bacterial proliferation. (A) Alcaligenes faecalis ATCC1004; (B) Enterococcus faecalis ATCC29212; (C) Mycobacterium smegmatis ATCC9341; (D) Micrococcus luteus ATCC9341; (E) Bacillus subtilis ATCC6633.
Processes 08 01481 g001
Processes 08 01481 g002 550
Figure 2. Changes in body weight and food intake per week of 26-week treatment. The dots represent the mean and SD. (A) Body weight changes during the study; (B) Food intake changes during the study.
Figure 2. Changes in body weight and food intake per week of 26-week treatment. The dots represent the mean and SD. (A) Body weight changes during the study; (B) Food intake changes during the study.
Processes 08 01481 g002
Processes 08 01481 g003 550
Figure 3. Results of white blood cell and differential cell counts. Puriton® slightly increased the number of neutrophils. (A), the difference of WBCs among the groups; (B), the difference of neutrophils among the groups; (C), the difference of eosinophils among the groups; (D), the difference of lymphocytes among the group; (E) the difference of monocyte among the groups. WBC, white blood cell; NE, neutrophil; EO, eosinophil; LY, lymphocyte; MO, monocyte. Each bar represents the mean ± SD (n = 6). * p < 0.05 vs. control (CON) group.
Figure 3. Results of white blood cell and differential cell counts. Puriton® slightly increased the number of neutrophils. (A), the difference of WBCs among the groups; (B), the difference of neutrophils among the groups; (C), the difference of eosinophils among the groups; (D), the difference of lymphocytes among the group; (E) the difference of monocyte among the groups. WBC, white blood cell; NE, neutrophil; EO, eosinophil; LY, lymphocyte; MO, monocyte. Each bar represents the mean ± SD (n = 6). * p < 0.05 vs. control (CON) group.
Processes 08 01481 g003
Processes 08 01481 g004 550
Figure 4. Results of blood chemistry analysis. Although LDL level was the highest, the HDL level was much higher than the level of other parameters. Puriton® significantly decreased glucose levels. (A) Total cholesterol; (B) LDL; (C) HDL; (D) Glucose. LDL, low density lipid; HDL, high density lipid. Each bar represents the mean ± SD (n = 6). * p < 0.05 vs. CON group; ** p < 0.001 vs. CON group; $ p < 0.05 vs. the 400 µL Puriton® group.
Figure 4. Results of blood chemistry analysis. Although LDL level was the highest, the HDL level was much higher than the level of other parameters. Puriton® significantly decreased glucose levels. (A) Total cholesterol; (B) LDL; (C) HDL; (D) Glucose. LDL, low density lipid; HDL, high density lipid. Each bar represents the mean ± SD (n = 6). * p < 0.05 vs. CON group; ** p < 0.001 vs. CON group; $ p < 0.05 vs. the 400 µL Puriton® group.
Processes 08 01481 g004
Processes 08 01481 g005 550
Figure 5. Results of histopathological analysis of Puriton® in the brain, heart, kidney, liver, and lungs. Scale bar, 100 µm; magnification, ×200.
Figure 5. Results of histopathological analysis of Puriton® in the brain, heart, kidney, liver, and lungs. Scale bar, 100 µm; magnification, ×200.
Processes 08 01481 g005
Table
Table 1. Inhibition rate of Puriton® against nine pathogenic bacteria. This experiment was conducted once on a single day.
Table 1. Inhibition rate of Puriton® against nine pathogenic bacteria. This experiment was conducted once on a single day.
NOMicro-OrganismsBefore Treatment
CFU/mL		At 30 min after Treatment CFU/mLInhibition Rate (%)
1Alacligenes faecalis ATCC100421,750,0000100.0
2Escherichia coli KCTC1923317,2000100.0
3Pseudomonas aeruginosa
ATCC BAA-1744		1,147,2000100.0
4Salmonella typhimrium KCTC1925170,0000100.0
5Staphylococcus aureus KCTC1928173,40070099.9
6Enterococcus faecalis ATCC2921213,700,00040,00097.8
7Micrococcus luteus ATCC934123,650,000850,00096.4
8Mycrobacterium smegmatis ATCC93418,400,00090,00093.9
9Bacillus subtilis ATCC66333,100,000275,00091.9
Table
Table 2. Virucidal efficacy of Puriton® against Zika virus after 4 or 18 h of liquid–liquid contact at 22 ± 2 °C.
Table 2. Virucidal efficacy of Puriton® against Zika virus after 4 or 18 h of liquid–liquid contact at 22 ± 2 °C.
Contact Time (h)90% Puriton®50% Puriton®70% Puriton®Water
a CCID50 Per 100 μL40.7 ± 0.0 ***0.7 ± 0.0 ***0.8 ± 0.2 ***5.0 ± 0.00
Log reduction value4>4.3>4.34.2n/a
a CCID50 Per 100 μL18b <0.7 ***0.7 ± 0.0 ***b <0.7 ***5.2 ± 0.3
Log reduction value18>4.54.5>4.5n/a
a Log10 CCID50 of virus per 0.1 mL, average ± SD of triplicate experiments; b for statistical analysis “<” signs were ignored; *** p < 0.001 compared with negative control (water), analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett post-test.
Table
Table 3. Virucidal efficacy of Puriton® against Influenza A virus (H5N1) after 4 or 18 h of liquid–liquid contact at 22 ± 2 °C.
Table 3. Virucidal efficacy of Puriton® against Influenza A virus (H5N1) after 4 or 18 h of liquid–liquid contact at 22 ± 2 °C.
Contact Time (h)90% Puriton®50% Puriton®70% Puriton®Water
a CCID50Per 100 μL4b <0.7 ***1.9 ± 0.5 ***b <0.7 ***4.5 ± 0.2
Log reduction value4>3.82.6>3.8n/a
a CCID50Per 100 μL18b <0.7 ***<0.7 ***b <0.7 ***4.1 ± 0.4
Log reduction value18>3.4>3.4>3.4n/a
a Log10 CCID50 of virus per 0.1 mL, average ± SD of triplicate experiments; b for statistical analysis “<” signs were ignored; *** p < 0.001 compared with negative control (water), analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett post-test.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bok, S.-H.; Kim, M.-H.; Lee, S.-Y.; Bae, C.-S.; Lee, M.-J.; Kim, K.-H.; Park, D.-H. Bactericidal and Virucidal Efficacies and Safety of Puriton®. Processes 2020, 8, 1481. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8111481

AMA Style

Bok S-H, Kim M-H, Lee S-Y, Bae C-S, Lee M-J, Kim K-H, Park D-H. Bactericidal and Virucidal Efficacies and Safety of Puriton®. Processes. 2020; 8(11):1481. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8111481

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bok, So-Hyeon, Min-Hee Kim, Soon-Young Lee, Chun-Sik Bae, Min-Jae Lee, Kwang-Ho Kim, and Dae-Hun Park. 2020. "Bactericidal and Virucidal Efficacies and Safety of Puriton®" Processes 8, no. 11: 1481. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8111481

APA Style

Bok, S.-H., Kim, M.-H., Lee, S.-Y., Bae, C.-S., Lee, M.-J., Kim, K.-H., & Park, D.-H. (2020). Bactericidal and Virucidal Efficacies and Safety of Puriton®. Processes, 8(11), 1481. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8111481

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop