Next Article in Journal
Antifungal and Antibacterial Activities of Musa paradisiaca L. Peel Extract: HPLC Analysis of Phenolic and Flavonoid Contents
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolic Engineering and Fermentation Process Strategies for L-Tryptophan Production by Escherichia coli
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mechanistic Models of Inducible Synthetic Circuits for Joint Description of DNA Copy Number, Regulatory Protein Level, and Cell Load
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Computational Methods Enabling Next-Generation Bioprocesses

by
Julio R. Banga
1,* and
Filippo Menolascina
2,*
1
(Bio)Process Engineering Group, IIM-CSIC (Spanish National Research Council), 36208 Vigo, Spain
2
School of Engineering, Institute for BioEngineering and SynthSys—Centre for Synthetic and Systems Biology, The University of Edinburgh, Scotland EH9 3FB, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2019, 7(4), 214; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7040214
Submission received: 10 April 2019 / Accepted: 10 April 2019 / Published: 12 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Computational Synthetic Biology)
Synthetic biology—the engineering of cells to rewire the biomolecular networks inside them—has witnessed phenomenal progress. In a little over a decade it has evolved from demonstrating proof-of-concept gene circuits in bacteria to developing a whole new class of cell factories able to produce compounds that would otherwise be prohibitively costly and/or unsustainable to obtain, e.g., squalene.
However, despite a thriving community and some notable successes, the basic task of assembling a predictable gene network from biomolecular parts is still a key challenge; it often takes many months to produce a gene circuit with the desired behavior. Mathematical models and Model-Based Systems Engineering methods offer a unique opportunity to address this issue and change fundamental procedures in Synthetic Biology.
This Special Issue on “Computational Synthetic Biology” aims to (i) review recent progress and (ii) report novel advances in the development and application of computational modeling to synthetic biology. The Special Issue consists of six papers and is available online at https://www.mdpi.com/journal/processes/special_issues/synthetic_biology
Despite over two decades worth of efforts, our ability to predict in silico the in vivo behavior of a gene circuit remains limited. One of the main reasons for this is the limited predictive ability of mathematical models for biological parts, very often due to a lack of informative experimental data. Experiments in biology tend to be time-consuming and expensive, so methods for their systematic design are very much needed. This Special Issue features two articles that attempt to tackle such a problem via Optimal Experimental Design. Bandiera and colleagues [1] show how iterative optimization of chemical stimuli leads to faster and more accurate model calibration of a building block of synthetic biology: an inducible promoter. Braniff and colleagues [2] instead use Optimal Experimental Design to extract the dependence of model parameters on the physiology of the host organism.
A necessary step after experiment design optimization is parameter identification and identifiability analysis. This is the subject of the contribution from Cinquemani [3] for the particular case of biomolecular networks. In this study, the author also proposes new reconstruction methods that leverage an increasingly common type of data in synthetic biology: population snapshots from microscopy or cytometry. Two additional contributions [4,5] tackle modelling issues. While Pasotti and colleagues focus on the derivation of mechanistic models of inducible circuits, Boeing and colleagues develop an aspect-oriented modelling framework that allows us to compose parts into circuits and study how they will interact with the host organism. The composability of parts and the use of optimization methods to automatically synthesize gene circuits robust to parametric uncertainty is the focus of Otero-Muras and Banga [6], whose contribution completes this Special Issue.
In assembling this Issue we sought to cover some of the most active areas of research in Synthetic Biology to stimulate discussion within the process engineering community. We hope these papers will ultimately serve as catalysts for cross-pollination of these fields and for their mutual benefit.

References

  1. Bandiera, L.; Hou, Z.; Kothamachu, V.B.; Balsa-Canto, E.; Swain, P.S.; Menolascina, F. On-Line Optimal Input Design Increases the Efficiency and Accuracy of the Modelling of an Inducible Synthetic Promoter. Processes 2018, 6, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Braniff, N.; Scott, M.; Ingalls, B. Component Characterization in a Growth-Dependent Physiological Context: Optimal Experimental Design. Processes 2018, 7, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cinquemani, E. Identifiability and Reconstruction of Biochemical Reaction Networks from Population Snapshot Data. Processes 2018, 6, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pasotti, L.; Bellato, M.; De Marchi, D.; Magni, P. Mechanistic Models of Inducible Synthetic Circuits for Joint Description of DNA Copy Number, Regulatory Protein Level, and Cell Load. Processes 2019, 7, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Boeing, P.; Leon, M.; Nesbeth, D.N.; Finkelstein, A.; Barnes, C.P. Towards an Aspect-Oriented Design and Modelling Framework for Synthetic Biology. Processes 2018, 6, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Otero-Muras, I.; Banga, J. Distilling Robust Design Principles of Biocircuits Using Mixed Integer Dynamic Optimization. Processes 2019, 7, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Banga, J.R.; Menolascina, F. Computational Methods Enabling Next-Generation Bioprocesses. Processes 2019, 7, 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7040214

AMA Style

Banga JR, Menolascina F. Computational Methods Enabling Next-Generation Bioprocesses. Processes. 2019; 7(4):214. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7040214

Chicago/Turabian Style

Banga, Julio R., and Filippo Menolascina. 2019. "Computational Methods Enabling Next-Generation Bioprocesses" Processes 7, no. 4: 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7040214

APA Style

Banga, J. R., & Menolascina, F. (2019). Computational Methods Enabling Next-Generation Bioprocesses. Processes, 7(4), 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7040214

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop