Next Article in Journal
Formulation Optimization of GG/SS/PVA/GEL Composite Hydrogels for Extrusion-Based Bioprinting Using Response Surface Methodology
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of CO2-CH4-H2O Diffusion in Gas Reservoirs: Combining Experimental Measurement and Molecular Dynamics Simulation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Current-Induced Scour Process Beneath Submarine Piggyback Pipelines: Influence of Geometry Configuration

1
School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
3
School of Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2026, 14(7), 1178; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14071178
Submission received: 6 February 2026 / Revised: 31 March 2026 / Accepted: 3 April 2026 / Published: 6 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Topic Advanced Technology for Oil and Nature Gas Exploration)

Abstract

In offshore engineering, piggyback pipelines have been widely used in recent years, making it practically important to assess scour beneath such pipelines. In this study, the local scour beneath pipelines in a piggyback configuration is numerically investigated. The model is based on the two-dimensional Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations, utilizing the RNG k-ε turbulence model for closure. Sediment movement is characterized by incorporating both the bed load and suspended load transport. The numerical model is validated against published experimental data. The effect of the gap ratio G/D and the position angle α on the scour and time-averaged force coefficients of piggyback pipelines with a diameter ratio d/D = 0.375 is examined, where G is the gap between two pipelines, α is the angle between the line connecting centers of two pipelines and the inflow direction, D is the main pipeline diameter, and d is the small pipeline diameter. The results demonstrate that the largest scour depth is obtained at α = 90° regardless of the gap ratio G/D. At G/D = 0.25, 0.375 and 0.5, the smallest equilibrium scour depth is observed at α = 135°, which is characterized by the suppression of vortex formation behind the main pipeline. The effect of the position angle α on the time-averaged force coefficients of the small pipeline is more significant at smaller gap ratios. The mean drag coefficient on the main pipeline attains its maximum value at α = 90°, and reaches its minimum value when α = 45° for all of the gap ratios examined. The equivalent pipeline method will not only underestimate the equilibrium scour depth, but also significantly underestimate the magnitude of time-averaged force coefficients.
Keywords: piggyback pipeline; steady currents; local scour; force coefficient piggyback pipeline; steady currents; local scour; force coefficient

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Sun, Y.; He, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, H.; Shi, Y. Current-Induced Scour Process Beneath Submarine Piggyback Pipelines: Influence of Geometry Configuration. Processes 2026, 14, 1178. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14071178

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Sun Y, He J, Li J, Zhang H, Shi Y. Current-Induced Scour Process Beneath Submarine Piggyback Pipelines: Influence of Geometry Configuration. Processes. 2026; 14(7):1178. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14071178

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yuan, Yunlong Sun, Junjian He, Jiabao Li, Haitao Zhang, and Yunwei Shi. 2026. "Current-Induced Scour Process Beneath Submarine Piggyback Pipelines: Influence of Geometry Configuration" Processes 14, no. 7: 1178. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14071178

APA Style

Zhang, Y., Sun, Y., He, J., Li, J., Zhang, H., & Shi, Y. (2026). Current-Induced Scour Process Beneath Submarine Piggyback Pipelines: Influence of Geometry Configuration. Processes, 14(7), 1178. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14071178

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop