Research on a Highly Self-Cleaning Cyclone Separation System for Wheat Breeding Plot Combine Harvesting
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Structural Design of Cyclone Separation Self-Cleaning System Based on High Self-Cleaning Agronomic Requirements
2.1. Overall Structure and Working Principle of the Cyclone Separation Self-Cleaning System
2.2. Research on Structural and Operational Parameters of Key Components in the Cyclone Separation Self-Cleaning System
2.2.1. Research on Structural and Operational Parameters of Negative-Pressure Centrifugal Fans
- (1)
- Overall Structure and Working Principle of the Negative-Pressure Centrifugal Fan
- (2)
- Design of Key Components for the Negative-Pressure Centrifugal Fan
- ①
- Research on Key Structural Parameters of the Negative-Pressure Centrifugal Fan Impeller and Blades
- ②
- Research on Airflow Rate and Air Velocity of Negative-Pressure Centrifugal Fan Based on Feeding Rate
- ③
- Research on Operational Parameters of Negative-Pressure Centrifugal Fans Based on Airflow Rate
2.2.2. Research on the Structure and Operational Parameters of Cyclone Separators
- (1)
- Overall Structure and Working Principle of Cyclone Separator
- (2)
- Design of Key Components for Cyclone Separator
- ①
- Research on Key Structural Parameters of the Cylindrical Section of the Cyclone Separator Wall
- ②
- Design of Inlet, Dust Outlet, and Discharge Outlet Dimensions
- ③
- Research on Spiral Guide Blades Based on Dynamics and Fluid Mechanics
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Design of the Cyclone Separation Self-Cleaning System Test Bench
3.2. Bench Test Plan for Cyclone Separation Self-Cleaning System
3.2.1. Test Materials and Equipment
3.2.2. Test Plan and Methodology
- (1)
- Influence of Cylindrical Section Diameter on Self-Cleaning Rate, Self-Cleaning Time, Impurity Rate, and Loss Rate
- (2)
- Effect of Dust Outlet Diameter on Self-Cleaning Rate, Self-Cleaning Time, Loss Rate, and Impurity Rate
- (3)
- Effect of Negative-Pressure Centrifugal Fan Speed on Self-Cleaning Rate, Self-Cleaning Time, Loss Rate, and Impurity Rate
- (4)
- Multi-factor Box–Behnken Experimental Design for Cyclone Separation Self-Cleaning System
- (5)
- Bench Test Validation Experiment
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Effects of Cylindrical Section Diameter on Self-Cleaning Rate, Self-Cleaning Time, Loss Rate, and Impurity Rate
4.2. Effect of Dust Outlet Diameter on Self-Cleaning Rate, Self-Cleaning Time, Loss Rate, and Impurity Rate
4.3. Effect of Negative-Pressure Centrifugal Fan Speed on Self-Cleaning Rate, Self-Cleaning Time, Loss Rate, and Impurity Rate
4.4. Multi-Factor Box-Behnken Test Results for the Operation of the Cyclone Separation Self-Cleaning System
- (1)
- Self-Cleaning Rate Regression Coefficients and Significance Analysis
- (2)
- Self-Cleaning Time Regression Coefficients and Significance Analysis
- (3)
- Loss Rate Regression Coefficients and Significance Analysis
- (4)
- Impurity Rate Regression Coefficients and Significance Analysis
4.5. Test Bench Validation Experiment Results
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- The structure of the cyclone separation self-cleaning system was designed based on the agronomic requirement of high self-cleaning performance. Through theoretical analysis and single-factor experiments, the ranges for key parameters were determined: the diameter of the cyclone separation cylinder (400–700 mm), the diameter of the dust outlet (290–320 mm), and the rotational speed of the negative-pressure centrifugal fan (1200–1600 r/min). The influence patterns of these parameters on self-cleaning and cleaning effectiveness within these ranges were established, providing a theoretical foundation for subsequent parameter optimization.
- (2)
- The BBD response surface methodology was employed to reveal the interaction mechanisms between factors. Experimental results indicated that the interaction between the fan speed and separation cylinder diameter significantly affected the self-cleaning rate and loss rate, while the interaction between dust outlet diameter and fan speed significantly affected the loss rate. Through response surface analysis, the optimal parameter combination was identified a separation cylinder diameter of 614 mm, a dust outlet diameter of 290 mm, and a negative-pressure centrifugal fan speed of 1495 r/min. Under this optimal combination, both self-cleaning performance and cleaning performance were optimized.
- (3)
- Bench test validation confirmed that the optimized parameters enabled a self-cleaning rate of 100%, a self-cleaning time shortened to 12 s, a loss rate reduced to 1.7%, and an impurity content of 0.16%. In comparison, current traditional wheat breeding plot harvesting and cleaning systems achieved self-cleaning rates of approximately 98–99%, self-cleaning times exceeding 30 s, loss rates around 2–3%, and an impurity content of about 1%. Overall, the developed system demonstrates high-quality, high-speed, and high-efficiency cleaning and separation performance, achieving for the first time the zero-residue requirement for breeding harvesting machinery.
- (4)
- The validation phase of this study was primarily based on bench tests and did not fully consider the impact of complex factors during actual harvesting, such as crop moisture content and field weed density, on the performance of the cleaning and self-cleaning system. Future research will focus on conducting validation through field trials to explore the adaptability and operational stability of the system when harvesting wheat of different varieties and maturity levels.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Geng, D.Y.; Mou, X.D.; Zhang, G.D.; Wang, Z.Y.; Zhu, J.K.; Xu, H.G. Analysis and optimization of cleaning mechanism of wheat combine harvester. J. Jilin Univ. 2022, 52, 119–230. [Google Scholar]
- Jin, C.Q.; Li, Q.L.; Ni, Y.L.; Wang, T.E.; Yin, X. Experimental study on double air outlet multi-ducts cleaning device of wheat combine harvester. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2020, 36, 26–34. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, W.; Wang, F.; Hao, Z.F.; Li, J.D.; Yang, C.; Wang, C. Development Present Situation and Prospect of Plot Breeding Machinery. Agric. Eng. 2014, 4, 7–10. [Google Scholar]
- Xing, G.Y. Research on Intelligent Control System of Plot Grain Combine Harvester. Master’s Thesis, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Wei, L.J.; Dai, F.; Han, Z.S.; Li, X.K.; Gao, A.M. Experiment on plot wheat breeding combine harvester. Acta Agric. Zhejiangensis. 2016, 28, 1082–1088. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Xu, L.Z.; Lv, L.Y.; Shi, Y.; Yu, X. Study on Modeling Method of a Multi-Parameter Control System for Threshing and Cleaning Devices in the Grain Combine Harvester. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, Y.W. Research and Development on Air Blowing Headerof Plot Combine Harvester for Grain. Master’s Thesis, Nanjing Agriculture University, Nanjing, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Dai, F.; Zhao, W.Y.; Han, Z.S.; Li, X.K.; Gao, A.M.; Liu, X.L. Improvement and Experiment on 4GX-100 Type Wheat Harvester for Breeding Plots. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2016, 47, 196–202. [Google Scholar]
- Dai, F. Design and Experimental on Longitudinal Axial Conical Cylinder Threshing Unit of Plot Wheat Seed. Master’s Thesis, Gansu Agriculture University, Lanzhou, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Tao, X.; Xu, Z.X.; Li, J.D.; Yang, W.; Du, Y.Q. Research Situation and Application of Wheat Breeding Field Experiments Mechanization. Agric. Eng. 2013, 3, 12–15. [Google Scholar]
- Ahn, Y.C.; Jeong, H.K.; Shin, H.S.; Hwang, Y.J.; Kim, G.T.; Cheong, S.I.; Lee, J.K.; Kim, C. Design and performance evaluation of vacuum cleaners using cyclone technology. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2006, 23, 925–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazyana, W.I.; Ahmadib, A.; Brinkerhoffa, J.; Ahmedc, H.; Hoorfara, M. Enhancement of cyclone solid particle separation performance based on geometrical modification: Numerical analysis. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 191, 276–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cristobal, C.; Antonia, G. Modeling the gas and particle flow inside cyclone separators. Prog. Energ. Combust. Sci. 2007, 33, 409–452. [Google Scholar]
- Liang, Z.W.; Xu, L.Z.; Baerdemaeker, J.D.; Li, Y.M.; Saeys, W. Optimisation of a multi-duct cleaning device for rice combine harvesters utilising CFD and experiments. Biosyst. Eng. 2020, 190, 25–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, X.Y. Design and Working Mechanical Study on the Cyclone Separation Cleaning System for Rapeseed Combine Haverster. Doctoral Thesis, Huazhong Agriculture University, Wuhan, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, J. Improved Design and Experiment on the Cyclone Separation and Cleaning System for Rapeseed Combine Harvester. Master’s Thesis, Huazhong Agriculture University, Wuhan, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- El-Batsh, H.M. Improving cyclone performance by proper selection of the exit pipe. Appl. Math. Model. 2013, 37, 5286–5303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gebrehiwot, M.G.; Baerdemaeker, J.D.; Baelmans, M. Effect of a cross-flow opening on the performance of a centrifugal fan in a combine harvester: Computational and experimental study. Biosyst. Eng. 2010, 105, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.L.; Zhang, Y.L.; Lu, C.G. Flow and Noise Characteristics of Centrifugal Fan in Low Pressure Environment. Processes 2020, 8, 985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chinese Academy of Agricultural Mechanization Sciences. Agricultural Machinery Design Manual; China Agricultural Science and Technology Press: Beijing, China, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, X.X.; Zheng, S.Y.; Shen, L.L.; Qin, C.Y.; Wang, J.W.; Zhou, L.; Mai, J.D.; Lu, M.B. Enhanced aerodynamic performance of irregular centrifugal fan casings through parametric and level-set topology optimization. Results Eng. 2025, 28, 107316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Z.W.; Wada, M.E. Parameter optimisation of a centrifugal fan for rice combine harvesters based on airflow resistance coefficients and CFD simulations. Biosyst. Eng. 2025, 259, 104287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alamnia, A.T.; Admasu, B.T.; Getie, M.Z.; Tigabu, M.T. Numerical investigation of spiral-walled cyclone separators in solid-solid separation. Powder Technol. 2026, 469, 121934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- NY/T 995-2025; Operating Quality for Grain Combine Harvester. Quality Inspection Center for Agricultural Product Processing Machinery, Ministry of Agriculture: Beijing, China, 2025.











| No. | Diameter of the Cylindrical Section of the Wall (mm) | Self-Cleaning Rate (%) | Self-Cleaning Time (s) | Loss Rate (%) | Impurity Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 400 | 98.45 | / | 1.52 | 0.13 |
| 2 | 450 | 98.76 | / | 1.39 | 0.17 |
| 3 | 500 | 99.06 | / | 1.03 | 0.21 |
| 4 | 550 | 99.31 | 18.9 | 0.81 | 0.24 |
| 5 | 600 | 99.82 | 14.5 | 0.42 | 0.29 |
| 6 | 650 | 99.26 | 17.8 | 0.34 | 0.36 |
| 7 | 700 | 98.78 | / | 0.28 | 0.39 |
| No. | Dust Outlet Diameter (mm) | Self-Cleaning Rate (%) | Self-Cleaning Time (s) | Loss Rate (%) | Impurity Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 290 | 99.05 | 18.4 | 0.52 | 0.37 |
| 2 | 295 | 99.11 | 19.5 | 0.79 | 0.32 |
| 3 | 300 | 99.15 | 17.9 | 1.05 | 0.28 |
| 4 | 305 | 99.02 | 18.5 | 1.21 | 0.24 |
| 5 | 310 | 99.16 | 19.3 | 1.45 | 0.22 |
| 6 | 315 | 99.13 | 17.9 | 1.62 | 0.19 |
| 7 | 320 | 99.08 | 18.6 | 1.78 | 0.14 |
| No. | Rotational Speed of the Negative-Pressure Centrifugal Fan (r/min) | Self-Cleaning Rate (%) | Self-Cleaning Time (s) | Loss Rate (%) | Impurity Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1200 | 98.09 | 0 | 0.53 | 0.31 |
| 2 | 1250 | 98.17 | 0 | 0.75 | 0.28 |
| 3 | 1300 | 98.54 | 0 | 1.05 | 0.25 |
| 4 | 1350 | 99.18 | 0 | 1.18 | 0.24 |
| 5 | 1400 | 99.68 | 19.5 | 1.34 | 0.21 |
| 6 | 1450 | 99.76 | 17.2 | 1.48 | 0.17 |
| 7 | 1500 | 99.81 | 15.9 | 1.69 | 0.14 |
| 8 | 1550 | 99.72 | 14.8 | 1.81 | 0.15 |
| 9 | 1600 | 99.75 | 13.4 | 1.93 | 0.12 |
| Level | A Cylindrical Section Diameter (mm) | B Dust Outlet Diameter (mm) | C Negative-Pressure Centrifugal Fan Speed (r/min) |
|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 550 | 290 | 1400 |
| 0 | 600 | 295 | 1450 |
| 1 | 650 | 300 | 1500 |
| No. | A Cylindrical Wall Section Diameter | B Dust Outlet Diameter | C Negative-Pressure Centrifugal Fan Speed | Self-Cleaning Rate /% | Self-Cleaning Time /s | Loss Rate /% | Impurity Rate /% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mm | mm | r/min | |||||
| 1 | 550 | 295 | 1400 | 99.48 | 15.9 | 1.26 | 0.23 |
| 2 | 650 | 290 | 1450 | 99.5 | 14.3 | 1.4 | 0.2 |
| 3 | 550 | 295 | 1500 | 99.55 | 11.8 | 1.81 | 0.15 |
| 4 | 600 | 300 | 1500 | 99.89 | 10.7 | 1.89 | 0.15 |
| 5 | 650 | 300 | 1450 | 99.49 | 14.1 | 1.53 | 0.18 |
| 6 | 600 | 295 | 1450 | 99.71 | 13.6 | 1.43 | 0.19 |
| 7 | 600 | 295 | 1450 | 99.76 | 13.8 | 1.43 | 0.19 |
| 8 | 600 | 300 | 1400 | 99.68 | 15.3 | 1.33 | 0.22 |
| 9 | 600 | 295 | 1450 | 99.72 | 13.6 | 1.43 | 0.2 |
| 10 | 600 | 290 | 1500 | 99.91 | 10.9 | 1.72 | 0.16 |
| 11 | 600 | 290 | 1400 | 99.65 | 15.1 | 1.23 | 0.24 |
| 12 | 550 | 300 | 1450 | 99.51 | 14.5 | 1.49 | 0.17 |
| 13 | 650 | 295 | 1500 | 99.5 | 11.5 | 1.76 | 0.15 |
| 14 | 650 | 295 | 1400 | 99.39 | 15.6 | 1.29 | 0.23 |
| 15 | 600 | 295 | 1450 | 99.81 | 13.7 | 1.45 | 0.19 |
| 16 | 550 | 290 | 1450 | 99.53 | 14.7 | 1.38 | 0.2 |
| 17 | 600 | 295 | 1450 | 99.78 | 13.8 | 1.45 | 0.19 |
| Regression Term | Sum of Squares | Degrees of Freedom | Mean Square | F-Value | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 0.52 | 9 | 0.058 | 23.03 | 0.0002 |
| A | 3.200 × 10−3 | 1 | 3.200 × 10−3 | 1.27 | 0.2967 |
| B | 1.110 × 10−16 | 1 | 1.110 × 10−16 | 4.411 × 10−14 | 1.0000 |
| C | 0.19 | 1 | 0.19 | 73.91 | <0.0001 |
| AB | 2.500 × 10−5 | 1 | 2.500 × 10−5 | 9.932 × 10−3 | 0.9234 |
| AC | 0.042 | 1 | 0.042 | 16.70 | 0.0047 |
| BC | 2.250 × 10−4 | 1 | 2.250 × 10−4 | 0.089 | 0.7736 |
| A2 | 0.28 | 1 | 0.28 | 110.27 | <0.0001 |
| B2 | 2.866 × 10−4 | 1 | 2.866 × 10−4 | 0.11 | 0.7457 |
| C2 | 0.020 | 1 | 0.020 | 7.79 | 0.0269 |
| Residua | 0.018 | 7 | 2.517 × 10−3 | / | / |
| Lack of Fit | 0.011 | 3 | 3.567 × 10−3 | 2.06 | 0.2480 |
| Error | 6.920 × 10−3 | 4 | 1.730 × 10−3 | / | / |
| Total | 0.54 | 16 | / | / | / |
| Regression Term | Sum of Squares | Degrees of Freedom | Mean Square | F-Value | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 40.35 | 9 | 4.48 | 285.30 | <0.0001 |
| A | 0.24 | 1 | 0.24 | 15.59 | 0.0055 |
| B | 0.020 | 1 | 0.020 | 1.27 | 0.2964 |
| C | 36.12 | 1 | 36.12 | 2298.86 | <0.0001 |
| AB | 0.000 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 1.0000 |
| AC | 0.000 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 1.0000 |
| BC | 0.040 | 1 | 0.040 | 2.55 | 0.1546 |
| A2 | 2.06 | 1 | 2.06 | 131.29 | <0.0001 |
| B2 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 1.0000 |
| C2 | 2.06 | 1 | 2.06 | 131.29 | <0.0001 |
| Residua | 0.11 | 7 | 0.016 | / | / |
| Lack of Fit | 0.070 | 3 | 0.023 | 2.33 | 0.2155 |
| Error | 0.040 | 4 | 0.010 | / | / |
| Total | 40.46 | 16 | / | / | / |
| Regression Term | Sum of Squares | Degrees of Freedom | Mean Square | F-Value | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 0.61 | 9 | 0.068 | 314.44 | <0.0001 |
| A | 2.000 × 10−4 | 1 | 2.000 × 10−4 | 0.93 | 0.3669 |
| B | 0.033 | 1 | 0.033 | 151.22 | <0.0001 |
| C | 0.54 | 1 | 0.54 | 2491.22 | <0.0001 |
| AB | 1.000 × 10−4 | 1 | 1.000 × 10−4 | 0.47 | 0.5172 |
| AC | 1.600 × 10−3 | 1 | 1.600 × 10−3 | 7.44 | 0.0294 |
| BC | 1.225 × 10−3 | 1 | 1.225 × 10−3 | 5.70 | 0.0484 |
| A2 | 2.632 × 10−7 | 1 | 2.632 × 10−7 | 1.224 × 10−3 | 0.9731 |
| B2 | 6.318 × 10−4 | 1 | 6.318 × 10−4 | 2.94 | 0.1302 |
| C2 | 0.036 | 1 | 0.036 | 166.66 | <0.0001 |
| Residua | 1.505 × 10−3 | 7 | 2.150 × 10−4 | / | / |
| Lack of Fit | 1.025 × 10−3 | 3 | 3.417 × 10−4 | 2.85 | 0.1691 |
| Error | 4.800 × 10−4 | 4 | 1.200 × 10−4 | / | / |
| Total | 0.61 | 16 | / | / | / |
| Regression Term | Sum of Squares | Degrees of Freedom | Mean Square | F-Value | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 0.013 | 9 | 1.438 × 10−3 | 64.93 | <0.0001 |
| A | 1.250 × 10−5 | 1 | 1.250 × 10−5 | 0.56 | 0.4769 |
| B | 8.000 × 10−4 | 1 | 8.000 × 10−4 | 36.13 | 0.0005 |
| C | 0.012 | 1 | 0.012 | 542.50 | <0.0001 |
| AB | 2.500 × 10−5 | 1 | 2.500 × 10−5 | 1.13 | 0.3233 |
| AC | 0.000 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 1.0000 |
| BC | 2.500 × 10−5 | 1 | 2.500 × 10−5 | 1.13 | 0.3233 |
| A2 | 5.158 × 10−5 | 1 | 5.158 × 10−5 | 2.33 | 0.1708 |
| B2 | 4.211 × 10−6 | 1 | 4.211 × 10−6 | 0.19 | 0.6759 |
| C2 | 9.474 × 10−6 | 1 | 9.474 × 10−6 | 0.43 | 0.5339 |
| Residua | 1.550 × 10−4 | 7 | 2.214 × 10−5 | / | / |
| Lack of Fit | 7.500 × 10−5 | 3 | 2.500 × 10−5 | 1.25 | 0.4028 |
| Error | 8.000 × 10−5 | 4 | 2.000 × 10−5 | / | / |
| Total | 0.013 | 16 | / | / | / |
| Cylindrical Section Diameter (mm) | Dust Outlet Diameter (mm) | Rotational Speed of Negative-Pressure Centrifugal Fan (r/min) | Self-Cleaning Rate (%) | Self-Cleaning Time (s) | Loss Rate (%) | Impurity Rate (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter Values | 614 | 290 | 1495 | 100 | 11.09 | 1.70 | 0.16 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Gao, Z.; Yang, C.; Xu, N.; Xia, C.; Han, C.; Shang, S.; Wang, D. Research on a Highly Self-Cleaning Cyclone Separation System for Wheat Breeding Plot Combine Harvesting. Processes 2026, 14, 726. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14040726
Gao Z, Yang C, Xu N, Xia C, Han C, Shang S, Wang D. Research on a Highly Self-Cleaning Cyclone Separation System for Wheat Breeding Plot Combine Harvesting. Processes. 2026; 14(4):726. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14040726
Chicago/Turabian StyleGao, Zenghui, Cheng Yang, Nan Xu, Chao Xia, Changjie Han, Shuqi Shang, and Dongwei Wang. 2026. "Research on a Highly Self-Cleaning Cyclone Separation System for Wheat Breeding Plot Combine Harvesting" Processes 14, no. 4: 726. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14040726
APA StyleGao, Z., Yang, C., Xu, N., Xia, C., Han, C., Shang, S., & Wang, D. (2026). Research on a Highly Self-Cleaning Cyclone Separation System for Wheat Breeding Plot Combine Harvesting. Processes, 14(4), 726. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14040726
