Next Article in Journal
Study on the Influence of Alkane C Chain Length on Coal Slime Flotation Based on Interfacial Thermodynamic Analysis and Characterization
Previous Article in Journal
A Non-Sorted Metaheuristic Method for the Multi-Objective Job-Flow-Shop Scheduling Problem in Conflict-Free Robot Swarm Manufacturing
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Synergistic Impacts of Wormhole Length and Pressure-Depletion Rate on Cyclic Solvent Injection: An Experimental Study Utilizing Microfluidic Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Uncertainty Analysis of Two-Phase Relative Permeability in Porous Media via Pore-Scale Simulation: The Impact of Initial Fluid Distribution

1
Sinopec Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, Beijing 102206, China
2
Sinopec Key Laboratory of Marine Oil & Gas Reservoirs Production, Beijing 102206, China
3
Changqing Downhole Technology Company, CNPC Chuanqing Drilling Engineering Company, Xi’an 710021, China
4
Research Institute of Exploration & Development, PetroChina Liaohe Oilfield Company, Panjin 124010, China
5
School of New Energy, Xi’an Shiyou University, Shaanxi, Xi’an 710065, China
6
School of Petroleum Engineering, Xi’an Shiyou University, Shaanxi, Xi’an 710065, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2026, 14(10), 1656; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14101656
Submission received: 10 April 2026 / Revised: 12 May 2026 / Accepted: 16 May 2026 / Published: 20 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Enhancing Unconventional Oil/Gas Recovery, 3rd Edition)

Abstract

Accurate prediction of steady-state relative permeability via pore-scale modeling is fundamental to understanding multiphase flow processes in diverse engineering applications. However, the stochastic nature of the initial fluid distribution (IFD) in simulations is frequently overlooked, creating uncertainties that may obscure the physical influence of critical parameters on transport behavior. In this study, a color-gradient lattice Boltzmann method was employed to conduct extensive steady-state simulations across two porous media of varying geometric complexity. The investigation focused on evaluating three representative IFD patterns across different capillary numbers (Ca) and viscosity ratios (M). By introducing the coefficient of variation (CV) and distribution interval overlap analysis, the IFD-induced uncertainty was systematically quantified. The results demonstrate that the IFD is a primary source of statistical variance in relative permeability, exhibiting a strong nonlinear coupling with Ca, M, and structural complexity. CV analysis reveals that uncertainty peaks within specific saturation windows, which shift according to the pore geometry. Specifically, the peak uncertainty window for total relative permeability shifts from Sw [0.5, 0.7] in the simple model to Sw [0.3, 0.5] in the heterogeneous model. Notably, the wetting phase exhibits pronounced instability in the low-saturation regime, with the wetting-phase CV reaching its maximum at Sw = 0.3 in the simple model. At low Ca conditions, IFD-induced errors can entirely mask the physical sensitivity of relative permeability to Ca and M within certain saturation intervals. Furthermore, variations in initial configurations lead to divergent evolutions of the fluid-fluid interfacial area relative to wetting saturation, highlighting the role of microscopic topological memory in governing flow behavior. This research provides a quantitative foundation for IFD sensitivity in pore-scale modeling and proposes the integration of a CV-based uncertainty framework into macro-scale models to enhance the robustness and reliability of multiphase flow predictions.

1. Introduction

Relative permeability (Kr) characterizes the effective transport capacity of a fluid phase in the presence of other immiscible phases. As a cornerstone of the multiphase Darcy law, Kr is an indispensable input parameter for macro-scale numerical models and plays a decisive role in predicting multiphase flow behavior [1,2]. In petroleum engineering, Kr directly governs the relative mobility of fluids during displacement, thereby determining sweep efficiency and ultimate recovery factors, particularly in the design of enhanced oil recovery schemes [3]. For carbon capture and storage, Kr characteristics are essential for predicting CO2 plume migration, assessing storage capacity, and evaluating long-term containment integrity [4,5]. In environmental engineering, Kr dictates the migration, distribution, and entrapment of non-aqueous phase liquids and associated contaminants in subsurface formations [6]. Furthermore, in emerging sectors such as geothermal energy and underground hydrogen storage, Kr determines injection capacities, plume evolution, and overall system operational safety [7]. Consequently, the accurate determination of reliable relative permeability curves is of paramount importance for both fundamental research and engineering applications in porous media.
Traditional methods for acquiring Kr curves rely heavily on laboratory core flooding experiments, categorized as either unsteady-state or steady-state based on the attainment of dynamic equilibrium [8,9]. While the unsteady-state method is widely adopted in industry due to its relative simplicity and shorter duration, its results depend significantly on theoretical assumptions such as the Johnson–Bossler–Naumann (JBN) method. This often leads to non-unique solutions and high sensitivity to model assumptions and boundary treatments [10]. Conversely, the steady-state method involves co-injecting phases at fixed ratios until flow rates and pressure gradients stabilize, allowing for direct calculation via Darcy’s law. Given its robust theoretical foundation and physical clarity, it is universally regarded as the benchmark for Kr measurement and model validation [11]. Beyond experimental means, theoretical frameworks like the Corey-type empirical models are utilized for their simplicity. Furthermore, navigating the wide variety of permeability models developed for complex multiphase systems presents a significant challenge. Recent studies have systematically demonstrated the complex equivalency and replaceability among different macroscopic permeability forms, highlighting the critical need for robust model selection and accurate parameter assignment to reduce uncertainties in simulation inputs [12]. However, these macroscopic empirical models often fail to capture the complex pore geometries and multiphase mechanisms inherent in real media [13,14]. Recent advancements, such as dual-wettability network theories [15] and connectedness theory [16], have redefined Kr through the lens of microscopic topology, explaining why the sum of phases typically yields less than unity. Nevertheless, these theories often depend on idealized structural assumptions, limiting their quantitative predictive capacity.
With the rapid development of computational techniques, pore-scale flow simulation has become a vital tool for Kr research. By explicitly resolving pore geometries and the dynamic evolution of fluid-fluid and fluid-solid interfaces, these methods elucidate multiphase flow mechanisms [13,17]. Prominent approaches include pore network modeling [18,19], direct numerical simulation [20], and the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) [21,22,23]. LBM, in particular, has gained traction for its ability to naturally handle complex boundaries and multiphase interfaces [21,24]. Previous LBM studies have identified phenomena such as the lubrication effect, where non-wetting phase permeability can exceed single-phase limits (Kr,nw > 1) [25], and the significant attenuation of non-wetting phase mobility due to wettability alterations [26]. Recent investigations have further explored heterogeneous wettability [27], 3D fractured-porous structures [28], and the sensitivity of Kr curves to capillary number (Ca) and viscosity ratios (M) [29,30]. In summary, an extensive body of literature has systematically examined the impact of critical parameters on relative permeability and elucidated complex pore-scale mechanisms, including droplet fragmentation, snap-off, the topological evolution of phase connectivity, and flow intermittency. These insights have established a robust physical framework for interpreting the emergent macroscopic behavior of relative permeability [31,32,33].
Despite these advancements, a critical factor has been systematically overlooked: the influence of initial fluid distribution (IFD) on steady-state relative permeability. In most existing pore-scale simulations, initial conditions are constructed by randomly assigning fluid phases at a target saturation, implicitly assuming that microscopic distribution variance at a constant saturation is negligible. From a pore-scale perspective, this assumption is often invalid. The IFD fundamentally dictates phase connectivity, cluster morphology, interfacial configurations, and potential flow pathways. Even at identical saturations, disparate initial configurations can yield significantly different flow paths and pressure-drop responses, particularly in capillary-dominated regimes (low Ca). This discrepancy may introduce substantial dispersion and uncertainty into steady-state Kr results. While experimental evidence suggests flow behavior is path-dependent [8], systematic quantification of IFD-induced uncertainty within numerical frameworks remains scarce. Ignoring this factor introduces stochasticity into single-run simulations, potentially undermining the reliability of upscaling pore-scale predictions to macro-scale models.
Motivated by these considerations, this work employs a color-gradient LBM to systematically investigate the impact of IFD on steady-state relative permeability and its associated uncertainty. Extensive parallel simulations were conducted across two porous media under diverse Ca and M combinations. The primary objective is to quantitatively evaluate the variance and statistical uncertainty of Kr under different IFD conditions and to explore the broader implications of this uncertainty for pore-scale prediction and multiscale modeling.

2. Methods

2.1. Color Gradient Lattice Boltzmann Method

In this study, the immiscible two-phase flow in porous media is simulated using the color-gradient lattice Boltzmann method with a D2Q9 lattice structure [34,35]. This framework is chosen for its superior capability in maintaining interface sharpness and minimizing non-physical diffusion between the wetting and nonwetting phases. The evolution of the particle distribution functions, f i α x , t , for fluid component (representing either the red or blue fluid) is governed by the collision-streaming equation [36] shown below:
f i α x + c i δ t , t + δ t = f i α x , t + Ω i α 3 Ω i α 1 + Ω i α 2
where c i denotes the discrete lattice velocity. The evolution process consists of three distinct operators including the single-phase collision Ω i α 1 , the perturbation step Ω i α 2 , and the recoloring step Ω i α 3 . To ensure numerical stability when simulating fluids with different viscosity ratios, the Multiple-Relaxation-Time (MRT) collision operator is adopted. The collision process is performed in the moment space as follows [37]:
Ω i α 1 = M i j 1 S j k m k α m k α , e q
Here, M is the transformation matrix that maps the distribution functions to the moment space vectors m k α , and m k α , e q represents the corresponding equilibrium moments. S is the diagonal relaxation matrix which controls the fluid viscosity and numerical stability.
The interfacial tension is incorporated into the model via the Continuum Surface Force model [38] within the perturbation operator Ω i α 2 . This method effectively suppresses spurious currents at the interface by defining an interfacial force F i f t , proportional to the interface curvature κ and the gradient of the phase field ρ N , as shown below:
F i f t = 1 2 σ κ ρ N ,   with   ρ N = ρ R ρ B ρ R + ρ B
where σ is the interfacial tension, ρ R and ρ B are the density of the red and blue fluids. Following the collision and perturbation steps, the recoloring operator Ω i α 3 is applied to segregate the immiscible fluids and minimize the interface thickness.
Finally, to accurately capture the fluid-solid interaction in complex porous media, we implement a geometrical wetting boundary condition [39,40,41]. This scheme minimizes non-physical mass transfer near solid boundaries and allows for the precise prescription of the static contact angle. To investigate the steady-state relative permeability, the simulation is designed to reach a dynamic equilibrium where both fluid phases flow under a constant pressure gradient. A uniform body force is applied to drive the fluids, implemented through the forcing scheme proposed by Guo et al. [42]. This body force is incorporated into the MRT evolution equation by adding a source term to the collision process in moment space. Then, periodic boundary conditions are applied in the flow direction. This setup ensures that the total mass of each phase and the overall saturation remain constant. Crucially, by eliminating inlet-outlet displacement boundaries, this approach prevents the artificial capillary end effects commonly observed in finite-domain experiments. For the fluid-solid interactions, the half-step bounce-back scheme is utilized on all solid nodes. This boundary treatment ensures second-order accuracy in space and effectively handles the complex geometry, maintaining the no-slip condition at the physical solid-fluid interface.
The simulation must reach a strictly defined steady state before data collection. Given the 2D nature of our domain, the convergence criteria are defined as follows:
u i x , t u i x , t 1000 2 u i x , t 2 < 10 8
where u i is the fluid velocity along the flow direction. Equation (4) means that the relative change in the total kinetic energy of the system over 1000 timesteps must be less than 10−8. Once this criterion is satisfied, the macroscopic velocities of each phase are averaged over the entire space to calculate the relative permeability using Darcy’s law. Comprehensive details regarding the algorithm implementation, matrix parameters, and model validation can be found in our previous studies [41,43,44].

2.2. Porous Geometry and Initial Saturation Configuration

To systematically elucidate the impact of IFD on relative permeability, two porous models, PM1 and PM2, were constructed with contrasting geometric characteristics (see Figure 1). PM1 represents an idealized topological framework with a computational domain of 720 × 366 and a porosity of 0.59. This model consists of a series of circular pores with varying radii interconnected by throats of non-uniform widths, providing a clearly defined structure for mechanistic observation. In contrast, PM2 was designed to emulate the stochastic heterogeneity of natural geological formations. It features a computational domain of 966 × 501 and a lower porosity of 0.33, comprising an assembly of randomly generated, irregularly shaped solid particles that exhibit significantly higher geometric complexity.
Regarding boundary conditions and numerical implementation, the top and bottom of both models were treated as solid walls using the no-slip bounce-back scheme, thereby confining the flow to the longitudinal direction under the influence of an external driving force. To facilitate the implementation of periodic boundary conditions and mitigate potential boundary artifacts, a buffer layer of 5 lattice units (lu) was integrated at both the inlet and outlet. To ensure numerical accuracy, a specific grid independence test was conducted for the porous models used in this study, the details of which are provided in Section P3 of the Supplementary Materials. The results confirm that the current resolution is well-converged for both macroscopic transport properties and microscopic fluid topologies. Furthermore, leveraging the sharp-interface nature of the color-gradient LBM, the geometric scales were strictly controlled to ensure that the minimum clearance between adjacent solid particles remained above 6 lu. This resolution comfortably exceeds the general requirement of 4 lu for numerical stability and flow-field resolution in narrow apertures [45], thereby ensuring the reliability of the simulation results [22].
To initialize the flow field, three representative IFD patterns, denoted as D1, D2, and D3, were developed (illustrated for PM1 in Figure 2), where wetting and non-wetting phases are represented by blue and red nodes, respectively. The D1 pattern, termed “boundary-to-center symmetric distribution,” utilizes an algorithm that traverses fluid nodes symmetrically from the upper and lower boundaries toward the center line. Nodes are assigned to the non-wetting phase based on a stochastic threshold until the target saturation is achieved. The D2 pattern, “center-to-boundary diffusion distribution,” initiates the assignment at the domain centerline and propagates toward the boundaries, resulting in a configuration where the non-wetting phase is centrally concentrated. Finally, the D3 pattern, “global random dispersion,” involves an unordered traversal of the entire pore space. Unlike the spatially clustered configurations of D1 and D2, D3 produces a highly disordered and dispersed initial distribution. Following the initialization of these configurations, a uniform horizontal body force (equivalent to a pressure gradient) was applied to all fluid nodes, and simulations were performed until the system attained a steady state.

3. Results and Discussion

To systematically investigate the influence of IFD on relative permeability curves and multiphase flow patterns, steady-state simulations were conducted across different Ca and M. In this work, the capillary number is defined as the ratio of the applied body force to the interfacial tension, C a = F / σ , where F represents the uniform body force (equivalent to the pressure gradient). This definition follows the work of Yiotis et al. [46] and offers the distinct advantage of bypassing the need for a predefined injection velocity, thereby facilitating the implementation of periodic boundary conditions. M is defined as the ratio of the non-wetting phase viscosity to that of the wetting phase ( M = μ n w / μ w ). The investigation focuses on unfavorable displacement regimes where M > 1. Furthermore, a constant contact angle of 30° was prescribed to emulate the characteristic behavior of oil-water systems in water-wet porous media. Detailed simulation parameters are summarized in Table 1. In addition, to ensure the universality of the results, all physical quantities are reported in lattice units.

3.1. Effects of Ca and M on Relative Permeability Curves

For each combination of Ca and M, five specific Sw were evaluated. To rigorously examine the influence of IFD on transport behavior, six independent simulations were performed for each saturation point, comprising three representative IFD patterns with two replicates each, resulting in a total of 240 numerical experiments. The derived relative permeability curves under varying Ca and M conditions are illustrated in Figure 3. In addition to the ensemble-averaged trends, the discrete nature and fluctuational characteristics arising from varying IFDs are quantified via standard deviation error bars.
As depicted in Figure 3a, Krnw monotonically decreases while Krw increases with rising Sw, consistent with classical multiphase flow theory wherein increased wetting-phase saturation enhances phase connectivity. Across the investigated Ca range, the increasing M significantly impedes wetting-phase mobility while promoting non-wetting phase transport. Under unfavorable viscosity ratios, the high-viscosity non-wetting phase tends to form continuous, preferential flow paths, whereas the low-viscosity wetting phase is relegated to pore corners or grain surfaces, encountering higher flow resistance. At lower Ca, the sensitivity of relative permeability to M diminishes, with the wetting phase exhibiting lower statistical variance than the non-wetting phase. Furthermore, both phases show enhanced mobility with increasing Ca, although this sensitivity wanes near the curve endpoints, suggesting that flow becomes dominated by the pore connectivity rather than the external pressure gradient. The fact that the Krw endpoints are consistently lower than those of Krnw further substantiates the strong hydrophilicity of the medium. Overall, the influence of Ca on the Kr curves outweighs that of M. When the viscous effect become more significant (high Ca), Kr exhibits a near-linear response to saturation over a broad flow window; however, at Ca = 1 × 10−4, capillary trapping intensifies, leading to a drastic morphological shift in the curves, characterized by a distinct slope discontinuity near Sw = 0.5.
Figure 3b reveals more complex nonlinear evolution in the PM2 model. The more complex structure induces an exponential growth of Krw with Sw. Notably, at Ca = 1 × 10−4 and Sw > 0.5, an anomalous increase in Krnw with saturation is observed. While similar behaviors have been noted by Munarin et al. [28], the current study elucidates the topological roots of this phenomenon in Figure 4. Different IFD patterns lead to divergent steady-state fluid topologies; this competition for spatial occupancy, triggered by the initial state, causes profound fluctuations in non-wetting phase transport capacity within specific saturation intervals, resulting in non-monotonic Kr profiles.
The spatial distribution of error bars quantifies the uncertainty introduced by the IFD. In the PM1 model, statistical fluctuations intensify significantly with increasing M and decreasing Ca, with the wetting phase generally exhibiting higher dispersion (e.g., standard deviation > 0.25 at Ca = 1 × 10−4 and Sw > 0.5). However, this trend shifts in the more complex PM2 model, where non-wetting phase uncertainty exceeds that of the wetting phase at Ca = 1 × 10−4 and Sw < 0.5. This indicates that Kr uncertainty is an emergent property resulting from the nonlinear coupling of Ca, M, and structural complexity (refer to Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). Another salient observation occurs at Ca = 1 × 10−3 and M = 10.0, where Krnw in the low-saturation regime exceeds the single-phase flow limit (Krnw > 1.0). Rather than numerical error, this phenomenon stems from the lubrication effect [47,48], a manifestation of viscous coupling. As demonstrated in Figure 5, the continuous low-viscosity wetting film coating the pore walls effectively lubricates the high-viscosity non-wetting phase, reducing shear resistance and enabling a transport capacity that surpasses its single-phase equivalent.

3.2. Effects of Ca and M on the Total Relative Permeability

In addition to individual relative permeabilities, the total relative permeability (Krtotal), defined as the sum of the non-wetting and wetting phase permeabilities (Krtotal = Krnw + Krw), serves as a pivotal metric for evaluating the entire transport capacity within porous media. Following the analysis framework established in Section 3.1, Figure 6 elucidates the evolution of Krtotal as a function of Sw under diverse flow regimes. Our findings indicate that Krtotal remains consistently below unity across the majority of the saturation range, with the notable exception of the Sw = 0.1 regime, where the lubrication effect elevates Krtotal above 1.0. This result underscores that the total flow resistance during multiphase co-existence typically exceeds that of single-phase flow. The mechanism of this phenomenon lies in the interfacial coupling effect, which induces auxiliary momentum exchange and viscous dissipation across the fluid-fluid interfaces [32,49]. Furthermore, Ca and M could significantly shift the Krtotal. An elevation in Ca consistently enhances Krtotal, yielding smoother evolution profiles with attenuated fluctuations. This corroborates that augmenting Ca by increasing the pressure gradient effectively counteracts capillary trapping forces, thereby attenuating the inhibitory effect of interfacial coupling on total flow capacity. Notably, Krtotal typically reaches a minimum in the intermediate saturation regime, reflecting the intensified spatial competition and momentum interference between the two phases.
A comparative assessment of the PM1 and PM2 models elucidates the profound impact of pore structural complexity on the non-linear characteristics of Krtotal. Specifically, the pronounced heterogeneity inherent in the PM2 model induces significantly greater variation amplitude and curvature in the Krtotal profile as a function of Sw compared to the simpler PM1 model. These findings hold substantial implications for practical reservoir numerical simulations. In macroscopic modeling, neglecting the precipitous decline in Krtotal governed by microscopic structural features leads to a severe underestimation of the pressure gradient required for displacement. Consequently, when characterizing reservoirs with strong heterogeneity, reliance on simplistic, smooth empirical relative permeability curves is inadequate. It is imperative to account for flow efficiency losses induced by pore structure and, accordingly, implement necessary non-linear corrections to macroscopic hydrodynamic models.
To quantitatively assess the uncertainty introduced by the IFD mode, the evolution of the standard deviation of Krtotal with respect to Sw was examined (refer to Supplementary Material, Figure S2). The results indicate that under conditions of low Ca and M, the standard deviation of Krtotal remains consistently high. This suggests that the total flow capacity of the system is highly sensitive to the initial topological structure of the fluids within these parameter conditions. Notably, at low Ca, the standard deviation exhibits a complex, non-monotonic evolutionary trajectory. For the PM1 model, maximum dispersion occurs near Sw = 0.7; conversely, for the complex PM2 model, the peak of uncertainty shifts significantly to Sw = 0.3. This distinct shift in peak location further corroborates the intricate coupling between structural heterogeneity and hydrodynamic parameters in determining the robustness of two-phase flow.

3.3. Quantitative Analysis of Uncertainty in Relative Permeability Curves

While the preceding sections utilized standard deviation to provide a preliminary assessment of uncertainty associated with two-phase relative permeabilities and their sum, this absolute metric is inherently sensitive to the mean value of the data. Consequently, standard deviation lacks the objectivity required for cross-comparison across different saturation regimes where Kr values fluctuate by orders of magnitude. To circumvent this limitation, we introduce the dimensionless coefficient of variation (CV), defined as the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean. This relative dispersion index effectively eliminates mean-scale interference, thereby offering a more precise elucidation of how initial fluid distribution influences Kr stochasticity under diverse physical conditions.
Figure 7a depicts the evolution of the non-wetting phase CV (CVnw) in the PM1 model. Under high Ca conditions, CVnw exhibits a monotonic increase with Sw. Conversely, in the low Ca regime, CVnw follows a non-monotonic trend, peaking at Sw = 0.7. Generally, an inverse relationship is observed between Ca and CVnw, confirming that elevating the pressure gradient effectively suppresses the transport fluctuations induced by IFD. Furthermore, a pronounced coupling effect between Ca and M is observed: at high Ca, elevated M amplify uncertainty, whereas at low Ca, the CVnw is paradoxically higher for lower M values. This suggests a complex role of viscous forces on flow stability when capillarity become significant. In contrast, Figure 7b illustrates that the wetting-phase CV (CVw) decreases progressively as Sw increases, a trend diametrically opposed to that of the non-wetting phase. This indicates that the wetting phase is exceptionally sensitive to the IFD in the low-saturation regime. The mechanism of this behavior lies in the microscopic configuration of the wetting phase; at low Sw, it exists primarily as confined thin films or isolated corner flows. In such states, minor stochastic variations in the microscopic topology can trigger drastic fluctuations in flow-path connectivity, significantly inflating CVw. Notably, under low Ca conditions, CVw reaches its maximum at Sw = 0.3. This finding provides critical guidance for engineering simulations: when modeling transport behavior near irreducible water saturation, the number of stochastic realizations must be substantially increased to ensure the robustness of statistical averages. Moreover, we recommend imposing stricter convergence criteria at these sensitive saturation points to shield against random perturbations and ensure the extracted data reflects the intrinsic transport properties of the medium.
Regarding the more complex PM2 model (Figure 8), the evolution of the CV largely aligns with the logic observed in PM1: high Ca consistently reduces uncertainty, and the two phases exhibit opposing CV trends relative to saturation. However, the intense heterogeneity of PM2 introduces more intricate oscillatory patterns. For instance, at Ca = 1 × 10−4 and M = 3.0, CVw follows a rising-falling-rising trend, with a distinct extremum at Sw = 0.5. This implies that in complex media, the randomness of spatial occupancy competition is more deeply influenced by structural topology, causing the “uncertainty risk window” to shift according to structural features. The multi-modal and non-monotonic characteristics of the CV in PM2 provide an essential reference for optimizing pore-scale simulation workflows. When characterizing highly heterogeneous models, a preliminary “CV scan” should be performed with a small sample size to identify critical uncertainty points (e.g., Sw = 0.5). For these saturation points, increasing the number of stochastic initialization samples is necessary to enhance predictive accuracy.
It should be noted that while the statistical analysis in this study is based on six realizations for each saturation point, the computational cost of transient color-gradient LBM simulations reaching steady state is exceptionally high. Each realization requires millions of time steps to satisfy the rigorous kinetic energy convergence criterion. Given these computational constraints, our study prioritizes the investigation of three fundamentally distinct, extreme IFD patterns to identify the uncertainty risk windows. Although this sample size is not intended for exhaustive probability density function mapping, the magnitude of variance captured across these representative patterns is sufficient to demonstrate that IFD is a primary, non-negligible source of uncertainty that can mask the sensitivity of physical parameters like Ca and M.

3.4. Quantitative Analysis of Uncertainty in the Total Relative Permeability Curves

This section delves into the evolutionary characteristics of CVtotal across both porous media models (Figure 9). In contrast to the intricate patterns observed in individual phase uncertainties, CVtotal exhibits a high degree of logical consistency across both PM1 and PM2. Generally, in low Ca regimes, CVtotal fluctuates drastically with Sw, indicating a profound dependence on IFD. Conversely, in high Ca regimes, the magnitude of CVtotal variation is significantly attenuated. This suggests that increasing the pressure gradient effectively suppresses fluctuations in total mobility induced by IFD, leading to enhanced statistical stability. Our investigation further reveals a compelling crossover effect regarding the influence of M on CVtotal. In the low-Ca regime, the CVtotal under low M is paradoxically higher than that under high M. However, this trend reverses in high-Ca regimes, where a higher M yields greater uncertainty. This phenomenon highlights a fundamental shift in the source of stochasticity under different flow mechanisms: when two phase viscosities are comparable, the competition for spatial occupancy within the pore space becomes increasingly intensified under a low Ca situation. Minimal variations in the initial distribution can trigger divergent path-topological evolutions. In contrast, interfacial instabilities and viscous coupling effects, exacerbated by high viscosity contrasts, become the primary contributors to transport uncertainty when Ca is high.
Furthermore, the pore structure significantly dictates the distribution of the “uncertainty sensitivity window”. At low Ca, the CVtotal peaks for the simpler PM1 are concentrated in the mid-to-high saturation range (Sw ∈ [0.5, 0.7]). In contrast, for the heterogeneous PM2, these peaks shift toward the mid-to-low saturation range (Sw ∈ [0.3, 0.5]). This shift underscores how pore geometry reshapes the specific saturation intervals where two phase interference is most pronounced. These insights into CVtotal evolution are instrumental for enhancing the reliability of pore-scale modeling. Practically, while the number of independent stochastic realizations must be increased within these “sensitive windows” at low Ca to mitigate random errors, the sample size can be strategically reduced in low-CV (or high-Ca) regimes to optimize computational resources. Finally, the uncertainty characteristics identified here offer a novel perspective for the parameterization of macro-scale numerical models. When translating Kr curves from micro-scale simulations to macroscopic inputs, focus should transcend mere statistical averages. Instead, CVtotal profiles should be utilized to construct saturation-dependent uncertainty evaluation models. By integrating these micro-physically grounded uncertainty weighting factors, macro-scale models can more accurately predict pressure propagation and fluid distribution. This provides a rigorous probabilistic framework for risk assessment and scheme optimization in engineering applications such as hydrocarbon recovery and geological carbon sequestration.

3.5. Comparison of the Effects of Initial Fluid Distribution, Ca and M on Relative Permeability

Building on the systematic analyses of the mean, standard deviation, and CV, a central physical question naturally arises: is the magnitude of the stochasticity introduced by IFD sufficient to challenge or even obscure the dominance of primary physical parameters (Ca and M)? To quantitatively evaluate the competitive relationship between IFD-induced error and the parametric response, we examined statistically representative saturation points (determined by the peak uncertainty analysis), and plotted the relative permeability ranges across different distribution patterns for both PM1 and PM2 (Figure 10 and Figure 11).
In the PM1 model, the degree of overlap between Kr distribution intervals serves as a direct visual indicator of the “shielding effect” imposed by the IFD on physical parameter responses. As illustrated in Figure 10a, when Sw = 0.1 and M = 3.0, the Krnw ranges for different Ca exhibit almost no overlap, indicating that Ca maintains dominance over the transport behavior. However, when M is increased to 10.0, the Kr intervals for two Ca cases begin to overlap significantly. At Sw = 0.7 (Figure 10b), the Kr values corresponding to different M under low Ca conditions become highly overlapping. This suggests that the influence of initial topological configurations on Krnw has severely interfered with the discernibility of viscosity ratio effects. For the wetting phase at Sw = 0.3, the IFD primarily masks the influence of M; at Sw = 0.9 (Figure 10d), the effects of either Ca or M on Krw are largely eclipsed by the statistical fluctuations stemming from the initial distribution. Analysis of the more complex PM2 model (Figure 11) further substantiates the universality of these conclusions. The interference intensity of the IFD exhibits profound nonlinear coupling with fluid saturation, Ca, and M. For example, at specific conditions such as Sw = 0.1 or Sw = 0.5, the effects of the physical parameters remain relatively separable. By contrast, in high Sw (Figure 11c,d), uncertainty arising from the initial configuration exerts a pronounced control over Krw, rendering the underlying physical trends induced by Ca and M nearly unidentifiable.
Collectively, the results from both models demonstrate that IFD is not merely a source of secondary numerical noise; rather, it is a core variable capable of substantively altering simulation conclusions. This finding mandates a rigorous statistical approach to IFD settings in future steady-state simulations, necessitating multi-sample ensemble averaging to ensure the accurate representation of fundamental physical laws.

3.6. Effect of Initial Fluid Distribution on the Fluid-Fluid Interfacial Characteristics

In multiphase flow through porous media, the fluid-fluid interfacial area (Anw) is intrinsically linked to interphase mass transfer and energy dissipation. It serves as a fundamental bridge for developing thermodynamically consistent relative permeability models, predicting recovery factors, and mitigating capillary pressure hysteresis [50,51,52]. This section investigates whether the stochasticity of IFD substantively alters the constitutive relationship between Anw and Sw, independent of fluid properties or pore geometry.
As illustrated in Figure 12, distinct IFD patterns in both PM1 and PM2 models induce markedly different evolutionary trajectories for the Anw-Sw curves. Specifically, two characteristic trends were observed: a monotonic decrease in interfacial area with increasing Sw, and a non-monotonic trend characterized by an initial increase followed by a subsequent decline. This diversity provides compelling evidence that the initial configuration not only alters flow capacity, but more fundamentally reshapes the pore-scale topology of fluids occupancy and the spatial evolution of interfaces within the pore space. Notably, while similar variations in curve trend have been reported by Adila et al. [53] and Porter et al. [50], such shifts are conventionally attributed to differences in fluid systems (e.g., oil-water vs. gas-water) or displacement modes (e.g., drainage vs. imbibition). By contrast, the present results reveal a more fundamental physical mechanism: even with identical fluid properties, pore structure, and external driving conditions, merely altering the initial fluid distribution is sufficient to reproduce the complex interfacial-area evolution modes described above. This finding offers a novel perspective on complex interfacial behavior in multiphase systems. At the pore scale, the IFD determines whether the fluid occupies the solid surfaces as continuous films or fills the channels as discrete ganglia and liquid bridges. These distinct initial topological states follow fundamentally different pathways of interface coalescence, breakup, and spreading as the system evolves toward steady state. Consequently, the interfacial area hysteresis or curve divergence observed in experimental studies may not stem exclusively from macroscopic displacement paths, but rather from the “topological memory” embedded within the system during its initialization. From a modeling perspective, these results suggest that IFD-induced uncertainty is a hidden driver of inconsistency in interfacial evolution. Unless the influence of the initial distribution is explicitly accounted for, constitutive equations and recovery predictions will struggle to eliminate the biases introduced by capillary hysteresis.

3.7. Implications and Outlook

The findings of this study regarding the influence of IFD on Kr uncertainty extend beyond conventional hydrocarbon recovery, offering critical insights for a wide spectrum of engineering domains involving multiphase transport in porous media. In the context of carbon capture and storage, subtle deviations in Kr curves directly impact injection pressure thresholds and storage capacity assessments. Similarly, in groundwater remediation, the microscopic distribution of non-aqueous phase liquids governs migration pathways and cleanup efficiency, while in the porous electrodes of proton exchange membrane fuel cells, the stochastic occupancy of water and gas profoundly alters mass transport resistance. Therefore, quantifying IFD-induced fluctuations is a prerequisite for the precision control of energy conversion and mass transport in these complex systems. The evolution patterns of CV identified in this work provide a novel probabilistic input strategy for multiscale modeling. Rather than relying on a single ensemble-averaged Kr curve, macro-scale simulators should incorporate uncertainty evaluation models based on CVtotal that evolve dynamically with fluid saturation. By introducing these micro-physically grounded uncertainty weighting factors, one can quantitatively assess how pore-scale stochasticity propagates and manifests at the macroscale as uncertainty in viscous/capillary fingering and sweep efficiency. This transition from deterministic parameters to probabilistic descriptions offers a more scientifically rigorous framework for risk assessment and decision-making in subsurface engineering.
To mitigate or eliminate the simulation biases stemming from IFD, several core methodological improvements are proposed. Priority should be given to the utilization of 3D porous media models, as the enhanced connectivity of 3D space facilitates critical physical processes, such as corner flow and wetting film transport, that are often restricted in 2D frameworks [54]. For instance, 2D assumptions intrinsically overestimate capillary snap-off and underestimate bi-continuity, as out-of-plane bypass routes are absent. These 3D mechanisms may allow fluids to overcome local energy barriers, thereby spontaneously dampening the stochasticity of the initial distribution at the macroscopic level. Furthermore, there is a clear need to transition from simple random assignment to dynamic initialization schemes that emulate geological history or engineering evolution, such as reaching the target saturation through drainage or imbibition processes. Such methods ensure that the microscopic fluid topology remains physically consistent, thereby reducing statistical errors at the source. Furthermore, the present study establishes a foundational baseline by assuming a uniform wettability system. However, natural geological formations frequently exhibit mixed-wet or fractional-wet characteristics. Because wettability fundamentally dictates the topological rules of fluid spatial occupancy at the pore scale, altering the wetting conditions would likely shift the uncertainty risk windows identified in this study to completely different saturation regimes. Therefore, systematically investigating the coupled effects of initial fluid distribution and diverse wettability conditions represents a critical and highly promising direction for future research, which is essential for generalizing these uncertainty frameworks to complex unconventional reservoirs. From a methodological standpoint, ensuring the model size exceeds the representative elementary volume (REV) is crucial for stability, as local stochastic fluctuations can be spatially averaged out. Future research could further leverage geometric topological descriptors, such as Minkowski functionals or the Euler characteristic [55], to establish mathematical mapping models between initial topology and permeability deviation. Such models could facilitate a posteriori compensation for stochastic bias, allowing smaller-scale simulations to reflect statistically significant macro-scale transport properties.
Finally, the evolution of the fluid-fluid interfacial area, which serves as a key metric for flow resistance and interphase mass transfer, is markedly influenced by the IFD. Our observation that disparate initial distributions can induce entirely different evolutionary modes, ranging from monotonic to non-monotonic trends, provides a fresh perspective on the complex interfacial behavior observed across various fluid systems. In light of this, future investigations should treat initial topological features as a primary independent variable rather than a secondary numerical setting. Establishing a correlation between initial topological characteristics and interfacial evolution paths will help elucidate the microscopic physics of capillary hysteresis from a more fundamental level. This approach will significantly enhance the predictive accuracy and physical consistency of models involving hysteretic effects, such as non-steady-state displacement and cyclic injection-production processes, ultimately leading to more robust descriptions of multiphase flow in heterogeneous porous media.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the influence of IFD on the relative permeability and associated uncertainty in two-phase flow through porous media was systematically investigated using the color-gradient lattice Boltzmann method. The primary findings are summarized as follows:
(1)
IFD serves as a critical source of uncertainty for relative permeability. Under unfavorable viscosity ratios, the three representative IFD patterns induce significant dispersion in both Krw and Krnw, a phenomenon particularly pronounced at low Ca. This uncertainty stems from divergent topological pathways during the evolution from the initial state to the steady state, ultimately leading to substantial variations in phase connectivity and flow resistance within the pore space.
(2)
The Kr uncertainty exhibits distinct saturation dependence and structural sensitivity. In the simple PM1 model, the wetting phase is more sensitive to the IFD in the low Sw conditions, whereas the non-wetting phase uncertainty is concentrated in the mid-to-high saturation range. Conversely, in the heterogeneous PM2 model, the increased competition for spatial occupancy shifts the “uncertainty risk window” toward lower saturation levels. The resulting multi-modal characteristics of CV curves suggest that heterogeneous structures act as amplifiers for stochastic perturbations.
(3)
Due to the additional resistance induced by interfacial coupling effects, Krtotal remains generally below unity. A notable exception occurs at Sw = 0.1, where the lubrication effect of a low-viscosity wetting film elevates Krtotal above 1.0. Typically, Krtotal reaches a minimum in the intermediate saturation regime, indicating the peak of interphase momentum interference. The uncertainty of the total flow capacity is also predominantly governed by Ca, with Krtotal exhibiting high sensitivity to the IFD under low-Ca regimes.
(4)
The IFD can obscure the influence of primary physical parameters. Under high Sw or low Ca, the variations in Kr expected from changes in Ca or M can be completely eclipsed by the statistical fluctuations induced by the IFD. Furthermore, the IFD reconfigures the constitutive relationship between Anw and Sw. Even with identical fluid properties and pore geometries, varying the IFD alone can reproduce both monotonic and non-monotonic Anw evolution modes, an observation likely rooted in the “topological memory” associated with the initial topological state.
Despite providing a quantitative foundation for IFD-induced uncertainty, this study has certain methodological limitations primarily stemming from computational constraints. While the physical simplifications regarding dimensionality and uniform wettability have been detailed in Section 3.7, a critical computational bottleneck is the restricted statistical sample size. Due to the immense computational overhead required for transient LBM simulations to reach a rigorous dynamic steady state, our current statistical analysis relies on bounding extreme patterns rather than an exhaustive Monte Carlo ensemble. To overcome this, future research should prioritize the development of machine-learning-based surrogate models. Coupling such data-driven surrogate models with 3D complex pore structures and heterogeneous wettability conditions will ultimately enable large-scale statistical convergence, bridging the gap between pore-scale topological stochasticity and macroscopic reservoir risk assessment.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pr14101656/s1, Figure S1: Evolution of the standard deviation for Krnw and Krw as a function of Sw across diverse conditions for (a) the PM1 model and (b) the PM2 model; Figure S2: Evolution of the standard deviation for Krtotal as a function of Sw across diverse conditions for (a) the PM1 model and (b) the PM2 model; Figure S3: Schematic of the contact angle between the wetting and nonwetting phases; Figure S4: Phase-field patterns of the two fluids at different contact angles when M = 1.0; Figure S5: Comparison between simulated and theoretical contact angles under different viscosity ratios; Figure S6: Schematic of two-phase flow between parallel plates; Figure S7: Comparison of theoretical and simulated relative permeabilities for two-dimensional two-phase flow between parallel plates at different viscosity ratios; Figure S8: Mesh independence verification for the PM2 model at Ca = 1E-3 and M = 3.0. (a) Comparison of the steady-state relative permeability curves between the original mesh and the refined mesh. (b) Steady-state two-phase fluid distribution at Sw = 0.1 using the original mesh. (c) Steady-state two-phase fluid distribution at Sw = 0.1 using the refined mesh.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.Z. and W.Z.; Methodology, R.Z., S.T., Y.C. and Z.C.; Software, S.T.; Validation, S.Z.; Formal analysis, W.Z. and Z.C.; Investigation, S.Z. and Y.C.; Resources, S.Z.; Writing—original draft, R.Z. and Z.C.; Writing—review and editing, Z.C. Funding acquisition, Z.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52204044) and the Youth Innovation Team of Shaanxi Universities (23JP131).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Rui Zhang was employed by the company China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation. Author Shakai Tong was employed by the company CNPC Chuanqing Drilling Engineering Company. Author Shuang Zhang was employed by the company PetroChina Liaohe Oilfield Company. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationship that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bear, J. Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media; Courier Corporation: North Chelmsford, MA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  2. Brooks, R.; Corey, T. Hydraulic Properties of Porous Media; Hydrology Papers; Colorado State University: Fort Collins, CO, USA, 1964; Volume 24, p. 37. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lake, L.W.; Johns, R.; Rossen, B.; Pope, G.A. Fundamentals of Enhanced Oil Recovery; Society of Petroleum Engineers: Richardson, TX, USA, 2014; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rezk, M.G.; Ibrahim, A.F. Numerical investigation of CO2 plume migration and trapping mechanisms in the sleipner field: Does the aquifer heterogeneity matter? Fuel 2025, 394, 135054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Khanal, A.; Khan, M.I. Impact of relative permeability hysteresis and capillary pressure on trapping mechanisms during CO2 sequestration in saline aquifers. In Proceedings of the Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, USA, 11–13 March 2024; pp. 83–92. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mao, B.; Liu, Z.; Liu, S.; Zhang, M.; Lu, T. Investigation of relative permeability, saturation and capillary pressure relations of NAPL-contaminated sands. J. Soils Sediments 2020, 20, 1609–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yekta, A.; Manceau, J.-C.; Gaboreau, S.; Pichavant, M.; Audigane, P. Determination of hydrogen–water relative permeability and capillary pressure in sandstone: Application to underground hydrogen injection in sedimentary formations. Transp. Porous Media 2018, 122, 333–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Honarpour, M.; Mahmood, S. Relative-permeability measurements: An overview. J. Pet. Technol. 1988, 40, 963–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Honarpour, M.M. Relative Permeability of Petroleum Reservoirs; CRC press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, X.; Kianinejad, A.; DiCarlo, D.A. An extended JBN method of determining unsteady-state two-phase relative permeability. Water Resour. Res. 2016, 52, 8374–8383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, G.; Foroughi, S.; Bijeljic, B.; Blunt, M.J. A method to correct steady-state relative permeability measurements for inhomogeneous saturation profiles in one-dimensional flow. Transp. Porous Media 2023, 149, 837–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Fan, Z.; Wei, W.; Li, M.; Wang, Y.; Huang, X.; Song, Y.; Wang, D. Equivalency and Replaceability between Different Permeability Models of Hydrate-Bearing Porous Media When Applied to Numerical Modeling of Hydrate Dissociation: Implications for Model Selection and Parameter Assignment. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 6090–6100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Blunt, M.J. Multiphase Flow in Permeable Media: A Pore-Scale Perspective; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  14. Corey, A.T. The interrelation between gas and oil relative permeabilities. Prod. Mon. 1954, 19, 38–41. [Google Scholar]
  15. Yassin, M.R.; Dehghanpour, H.; Wood, J.; Lan, Q. A theory for relative permeability of unconventional rocks with dual-wettability pore network. Spe J. 2016, 21, 1970–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Glover, P.W.; Wei, W.; Lorinczi, P. Connectedness Theory of Relative Permeability. Transp. Porous Media 2025, 152, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Blunt, M.J.; Bijeljic, B.; Dong, H.; Gharbi, O.; Iglauer, S.; Mostaghimi, P.; Paluszny, A.; Pentland, C. Pore-scale imaging and modelling. Adv. Water Resour. 2013, 51, 197–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Joekar-Niasar, V.; Hassanizadeh, S. Analysis of fundamentals of two-phase flow in porous media using dynamic pore-network models: A review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 42, 1895–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Valvatne, P.H.; Blunt, M.J. Predictive pore-scale modeling of two-phase flow in mixed wet media. Water Resour. Res. 2004, 40, W07406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Raeini, A.Q.; Bijeljic, B.; Blunt, M.J. Modelling capillary trapping using finite-volume simulation of two-phase flow directly on micro-CT images. Adv. Water Resour. 2015, 83, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pan, C.; Hilpert, M.; Miller, C.T. Lattice-Boltzmann simulation of two-phase flow in porous media. Water Resour. Res. 2004, 40, W01501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cheng, Z.; Tong, S.; Shang, X.; Yu, J.; Li, X.; Dou, L. Lattice Boltzmann simulation of counter-current imbibition of oil and water in porous media at the equivalent capillarity. AIP Adv. 2024, 14, 085314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sugimoto, M.; Kaneda, M.; Suga, K.; Shigeta, M. A Compact-Stencil Wetting Boundary Condition for Three-Dimensional Curved Surfaces in a Phase-Field Lattice Boltzmann Method. Fluids 2026, 11, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huang, H.; Lu, X.-y. Relative permeabilities and coupling effects in steady-state gas-liquid flow in porous media: A lattice Boltzmann study. Phys. Fluids 2009, 21, 092104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ramstad, T.; Øren, P.-E.; Bakke, S. Simulation of two-phase flow in reservoir rocks using a lattice Boltzmann method. Spe J. 2010, 15, 917–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Landry, C.; Karpyn, Z.; Ayala, O. Relative permeability of homogenous-wet and mixed-wet porous media as determined by pore-scale lattice Boltzmann modeling. Water Resour. Res. 2014, 50, 3672–3689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yu, S.; Mehana, M.; Guiltinan, E.J.; Germann, T.C.; Gross, M.R.; Kang, Q. Quantifying the effect of pore-size dependent wettability on relative permeabilities using lattice Boltzmann simulation. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2025, 130, e2025JB031392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Munarin, F.F.; Gouze, P.; Nepomuceno Filho, F. Two-phase flow dynamics in 3D fractures: Influence of aperture, wettability, and fluid properties from Lattice Boltzmann Simulations. Adv. Water Resour. 2025, 206, 105133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lv, Z.; Huang, H. Lattice Boltzmann Study of the Steady-State Relative Permeabilities in Porous Media. Adv. Appl. Math. Mech. 2021, 13, 619–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, H.; Ning, Z.; Kang, Q.; Chen, L.; Zhao, T. Relative permeability of two immiscible fluids flowing through porous media determined by lattice Boltzmann method. Int. Commun. Heat. Mass. Transf. 2017, 85, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ramstad, T.; Idowu, N.; Nardi, C.; Øren, P.-E. Relative permeability calculations from two-phase flow simulations directly on digital images of porous rocks. Transp. Porous Media 2012, 94, 487–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhao, J.; Kang, Q.; Yao, J.; Viswanathan, H.; Pawar, R.; Zhang, L.; Sun, H. The Effect of Wettability Heterogeneity on Relative Permeability of Two-Phase Flow in Porous Media: A Lattice Boltzmann Study. Water Resour. Res. 2018, 54, 1295–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hao, L.; Cheng, P. Pore-scale simulations on relative permeabilities of porous media by lattice Boltzmann method. Int. J. Heat. Mass. Transf. 2010, 53, 1908–1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Reis, T.; Phillips, T.N. Lattice Boltzmann model for simulating immiscible two-phase flows. J. Phys. A Math. 2007, 40, 4033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kang, D.H.; Yun, T.S. Minimized Capillary End Effect During CO2 Displacement in 2-D Micromodel by Manipulating Capillary Pressure at the Outlet Boundary in Lattice Boltzmann Method. Water Resour. Res. 2018, 54, 895–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, H.; Valocchi, A.J.; Kang, Q. Three-dimensional lattice Boltzmann model for immiscible two-phase flow simulations. Phys. Rev. E 2012, 85, 046309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lallemand, P.; Luo, L.-S. Theory of the lattice Boltzmann method: Dispersion, dissipation, isotropy, Galilean invariance, and stability. Phys. Rev. E 2000, 61, 6546–6562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lishchuk, S.; Care, C.; Halliday, I. Lattice Boltzmann algorithm for surface tension with greatly reduced microcurrents. Phys. Rev. E 2003, 67, 036701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xu, Z.; Liu, H.; Valocchi, A.J. Lattice Boltzmann simulation of immiscible two-phase flow with capillary valve effect in porous media. Water Resour. Res. 2017, 53, 3770–3790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Akai, T.; Bijeljic, B.; Blunt, M.J. Wetting boundary condition for the color-gradient lattice Boltzmann method: Validation with analytical and experimental data. Adv. Water Resour. 2018, 116, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cheng, Z.; Gao, H.; Ning, Z.; Wang, C.; Li, T. Inertial Effect on Oil/Water Countercurrent Imbibition in Porous Media from a Pore-Scale Perspective. SPE J. 2022, 27, 1619–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Guo, Z.; Zheng, C.; Shi, B. Discrete lattice effects on the forcing term in the lattice Boltzmann method. Phys. Rev. E 2002, 65, 046308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cheng, Z.; Gao, H.; Tong, S.; Zhang, W.; Ning, Z. Pore scale insights into the role of inertial effect during the two-phase forced imbibition. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2023, 278, 118921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cheng, Z.; Zhang, W.; Ning, Z.; Dou, L.; Zhan, J.; Zhao, C. Wettability control on imbibition behavior of oil and water in porous media. Phys. Fluids 2022, 34, 076603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gu, Q.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, H. Pore-scale study of counter-current imbibition in strongly water-wet fractured porous media using lattice Boltzmann method. Phys. Fluids 2019, 31, 086602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yiotis, A.G.; Psihogios, J.; Kainourgiakis, M.E.; Papaioannou, A.; Stubos, A.K. A lattice Boltzmann study of viscous coupling effects in immiscible two-phase flow in porous media. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2007, 300, 35–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, H.; Pan, C.; Miller, C.T. Pore-scale investigation of viscous coupling effects for two-phase flow in porous media. Phys. Rev. E 2005, 72, 026705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Suwandi, N.; Jiang, F.; Tsuji, T. Relative Permeability Variation Depending on Viscosity Ratio and Capillary Number. Water Resour. Res. 2022, 58, e2021WR031501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bertels, S.P.; DiCarlo, D.A.; Blunt, M.J. Measurement of aperture distribution, capillary pressure, relative permeability, and in situ saturation in a rock fracture using computed tomography scanning. Water Resour. Res. 2001, 37, 649–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Porter, M.L.; Schaap, M.G.; Wildenschild, D. Lattice-Boltzmann simulations of the capillary pressure–saturation–interfacial area relationship for porous media. Adv. Water Resour. 2009, 32, 1632–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Schlüter, S.; Berg, S.; Rücker, M.; Armstrong, R.; Vogel, H.J.; Hilfer, R.; Wildenschild, D. Pore-scale displacement mechanisms as a source of hysteresis for two-phase flow in porous media. Water Resour. Res. 2016, 52, 2194–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liu, H.; Valocchi, A.J.; Werth, C.; Kang, Q.; Oostrom, M. Pore-scale simulation of liquid CO2 displacement of water using a two-phase lattice Boltzmann model. Adv. Water Resour. 2014, 73, 144–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Adila, A.; Ebadi, M.; Xi, W.; Qi, X.; Jing, Y.; Mostaghimi, P.; Armstrong, R.T. Comparison of relative permeability hysteresis in oil-brine and gas-brine systems: A pore-scale investigation. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 2025, 194, 105483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhao, B.; MacMinn, C.W.; Juanes, R. Wettability control on multiphase flow in patterned microfluidics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 10251–10256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jiang, H.; Shi, B.; Qin, C.Z.; Arns, C.; Hassanizadeh, S.M. Pore-scale rock-typing and upscaling of relative permeability on a laminated sandstone through Minkowski measures. Water Resour. Res. 2026, 62, e2025WR041036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Two porous media (a) PM1 and (b) PM2 used in relative permeability simulations, where the white and black nodes denote fluid and solid, respectively.
Figure 1. Two porous media (a) PM1 and (b) PM2 used in relative permeability simulations, where the white and black nodes denote fluid and solid, respectively.
Processes 14 01656 g001
Figure 2. Three representative configurations of initial fluid saturation illustrated using the PM1 model at a wetting-phase saturation of Sw = 0.9: (a) D1, (b) D2, and (c) D3. The gray, blue, and red nodes represent the solid matrix, the wetting phase, and the non-wetting phase, respectively.
Figure 2. Three representative configurations of initial fluid saturation illustrated using the PM1 model at a wetting-phase saturation of Sw = 0.9: (a) D1, (b) D2, and (c) D3. The gray, blue, and red nodes represent the solid matrix, the wetting phase, and the non-wetting phase, respectively.
Processes 14 01656 g002
Figure 3. Relative permeability curves with error bars under different Ca and M for (a) PM1 and (b) PM2.
Figure 3. Relative permeability curves with error bars under different Ca and M for (a) PM1 and (b) PM2.
Processes 14 01656 g003
Figure 4. Distributions of wetting and nonwetting fluids in the PM2 model when Ca = 1 × 10−4 and M = 10.0 across three initial distribution modes: (ac) at Sw = 0.5 and for (df) at Sw = 0.7.
Figure 4. Distributions of wetting and nonwetting fluids in the PM2 model when Ca = 1 × 10−4 and M = 10.0 across three initial distribution modes: (ac) at Sw = 0.5 and for (df) at Sw = 0.7.
Processes 14 01656 g004
Figure 5. Distributions of wetting and nonwetting fluids in (a) the PM1 model and (b) the PM2 model when Ca = 1 × 10−3, M = 10.0 and Sw = 0.1 under the D3 mode.
Figure 5. Distributions of wetting and nonwetting fluids in (a) the PM1 model and (b) the PM2 model when Ca = 1 × 10−3, M = 10.0 and Sw = 0.1 under the D3 mode.
Processes 14 01656 g005
Figure 6. Total relative permeability curves with error bars under different Ca and M for (a) the PM1 model and (b) the PM2 model.
Figure 6. Total relative permeability curves with error bars under different Ca and M for (a) the PM1 model and (b) the PM2 model.
Processes 14 01656 g006
Figure 7. CV of relative permeability as a function of Sw for (a) the nonwetting phase and (b) the wetting phase for the PM1 model.
Figure 7. CV of relative permeability as a function of Sw for (a) the nonwetting phase and (b) the wetting phase for the PM1 model.
Processes 14 01656 g007
Figure 8. CV of relative permeability as a function of Sw for (a) the nonwetting phase and (b) the wetting phase for the PM2 model.
Figure 8. CV of relative permeability as a function of Sw for (a) the nonwetting phase and (b) the wetting phase for the PM2 model.
Processes 14 01656 g008
Figure 9. CV of the total relative permeability as a function of Sw for (a) the PM1 model and (b) the PM2 model.
Figure 9. CV of the total relative permeability as a function of Sw for (a) the PM1 model and (b) the PM2 model.
Processes 14 01656 g009
Figure 10. Relative permeability of two fluids for the PM1 model under three initial fluid configurations at specific saturations and various Ca and M. (a) Sw = 0.1; (b) Sw = 0.7; (c) Sw = 0.3; (d) Sw = 0.9.
Figure 10. Relative permeability of two fluids for the PM1 model under three initial fluid configurations at specific saturations and various Ca and M. (a) Sw = 0.1; (b) Sw = 0.7; (c) Sw = 0.3; (d) Sw = 0.9.
Processes 14 01656 g010
Figure 11. Relative permeability of two fluids for the PM2 model under three initial fluid configurations at specific saturations and various Ca and M. (a) Sw = 0.1; (b) Sw = 0.5; (c) Sw = 0.3; (d) Sw = 0.9.
Figure 11. Relative permeability of two fluids for the PM2 model under three initial fluid configurations at specific saturations and various Ca and M. (a) Sw = 0.1; (b) Sw = 0.5; (c) Sw = 0.3; (d) Sw = 0.9.
Processes 14 01656 g011aProcesses 14 01656 g011b
Figure 12. Relationship between Anw and Sw at Ca = 1 × 10−3 and M = 3.0 under three initial fluid configurations for (a) the PM1 model and (b) the PM2 model.
Figure 12. Relationship between Anw and Sw at Ca = 1 × 10−3 and M = 3.0 under three initial fluid configurations for (a) the PM1 model and (b) the PM2 model.
Processes 14 01656 g012
Table 1. Key parameters for steady-state relative permeability simulations.
Table 1. Key parameters for steady-state relative permeability simulations.
Porous ModelCaMσF
PM1 and PM21.00 × 10−33.00.02782.78 × 10−5
10.02.78 × 10−6
1.00 × 10−43.02.78 × 10−5
10.02.78 × 10−6
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, R.; Tong, S.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, W.; Chang, Y.; Cheng, Z. Uncertainty Analysis of Two-Phase Relative Permeability in Porous Media via Pore-Scale Simulation: The Impact of Initial Fluid Distribution. Processes 2026, 14, 1656. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14101656

AMA Style

Zhang R, Tong S, Zhang S, Zhang W, Chang Y, Cheng Z. Uncertainty Analysis of Two-Phase Relative Permeability in Porous Media via Pore-Scale Simulation: The Impact of Initial Fluid Distribution. Processes. 2026; 14(10):1656. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14101656

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Rui, Shaokai Tong, Shuang Zhang, Wentong Zhang, Yuanhao Chang, and Zhilin Cheng. 2026. "Uncertainty Analysis of Two-Phase Relative Permeability in Porous Media via Pore-Scale Simulation: The Impact of Initial Fluid Distribution" Processes 14, no. 10: 1656. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14101656

APA Style

Zhang, R., Tong, S., Zhang, S., Zhang, W., Chang, Y., & Cheng, Z. (2026). Uncertainty Analysis of Two-Phase Relative Permeability in Porous Media via Pore-Scale Simulation: The Impact of Initial Fluid Distribution. Processes, 14(10), 1656. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14101656

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop