Next Article in Journal
Scale Deposition During Water Flooding and the Effect on Reservoir Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Study of Variable-Flow Gas Injection Patterns on CH4 Diffusion Dynamics: Experimental Insights into Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Gas Sources and Productivity-Influencing Factors of Matrix Reservoirs in Xujiahe Formation—A Case Study of Xin 8-5H Well and Xinsheng 204-1H Well

1
Petroleum Engineering Research Institute of Southwest Oil and Gas Company, SINOPEC, Deyang 610080, China
2
Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2025, 13(8), 2644; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13082644
Submission received: 9 June 2025 / Revised: 9 August 2025 / Accepted: 16 August 2025 / Published: 20 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Systems)

Abstract

The tight sandstone gas reservoirs of the Xujiahe Formation are critical targets for tight gas exploration and development in the Sichuan Basin. While Class I reservoirs have been successfully developed using staged volume fracturing technology, efforts are being increasingly directed toward Class II and III matrix-type blocks. These reservoirs are characterized by a low permeability, high geo-stress differentials, strong heterogeneity, and limited fracture development. These properties result in several challenges, including ambiguous gas production sources, low reservoir utilization rates, significant variability in horizontal well performance, and rapid early-stage production decline—all of which hinder the effective development of matrix-type reservoirs. This study examines two representative fractured wells, Xin 8-5H and Xinsheng 204-1H, located in Class II and III blocks of the Xujiahe Formation gas reservoir. To identify gas production sources, we establish full-fracturing-section productivity models. Furthermore, accounting for variations in geological characteristics, we develop distinct productivity models for three key zones, the matrix area, fracture area, and fault area, to evaluate the productivity controls. The findings reveal that well Xin 8-5H primarily produces gas from the matrix and fault zones, whereas well Xinsheng 204-1H derives most of its production from the matrix and natural fractures. In matrix-dominated zones, generating complex fracture networks enhances productivity. An optimal cluster spacing of approximately 14 m ensures broad pressure sweep coverage while maintaining effective inter-cluster fracture connectivity. Additionally, natural fractures in the Xu-2 matrix reservoirs play a vital role in fluid communication. To maximize reservoir contact, well trajectories should be designed such that natural fractures are oriented either parallel or perpendicular to the wellbore, thereby improving lateral and vertical development. Near fault zones, adjusting cluster spacing to 14–25 m—while keeping the distance between faults and fracturing stages below 50 m—effectively connects faults and substantially increases production. This study introduces a systematic methodology for identifying gas sources in matrix reservoirs and optimizes key productivity-influencing parameters. The results provide both theoretical insights and practical strategies for the efficient development of Xu-2 matrix reservoirs.
Keywords: hydraulic fracturing process optimization; matrix reservoir productivity model; gas production sources; fracturing process parameters optimization; unconventional gas reservoirs development hydraulic fracturing process optimization; matrix reservoir productivity model; gas production sources; fracturing process parameters optimization; unconventional gas reservoirs development

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Miao, W.; Wang, X.; Zhang, W.; Qiu, L.; Lu, Q.; Gong, X. Gas Sources and Productivity-Influencing Factors of Matrix Reservoirs in Xujiahe Formation—A Case Study of Xin 8-5H Well and Xinsheng 204-1H Well. Processes 2025, 13, 2644. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13082644

AMA Style

Miao W, Wang X, Zhang W, Qiu L, Lu Q, Gong X. Gas Sources and Productivity-Influencing Factors of Matrix Reservoirs in Xujiahe Formation—A Case Study of Xin 8-5H Well and Xinsheng 204-1H Well. Processes. 2025; 13(8):2644. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13082644

Chicago/Turabian Style

Miao, Weijie, Xingwen Wang, Wen Zhang, Ling Qiu, Qianli Lu, and Xinwei Gong. 2025. "Gas Sources and Productivity-Influencing Factors of Matrix Reservoirs in Xujiahe Formation—A Case Study of Xin 8-5H Well and Xinsheng 204-1H Well" Processes 13, no. 8: 2644. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13082644

APA Style

Miao, W., Wang, X., Zhang, W., Qiu, L., Lu, Q., & Gong, X. (2025). Gas Sources and Productivity-Influencing Factors of Matrix Reservoirs in Xujiahe Formation—A Case Study of Xin 8-5H Well and Xinsheng 204-1H Well. Processes, 13(8), 2644. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13082644

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop