Next Article in Journal
Design and Evaluation of LLDPE/Epoxy Composite Tiles with YOLOv8-Based Defect Detection for Flooring Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Hydraulic Retention Time on Municipal Wastewater Treatment Using a Membraneless Single-Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Valorization of Food Industry Waste for Biodegradable Biopolymer-Based Packaging Films

1
Faculty of Technology, University of Niš, Bulevar Oslobođenja 124, 16000 Leskovac, Serbia
2
Department of Plant Origin Food Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary Sciences, 61242 Brno, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2025, 13(8), 2567; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13082567
Submission received: 22 July 2025 / Revised: 8 August 2025 / Accepted: 12 August 2025 / Published: 14 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Resource Utilization of Food Industry Byproducts)

Abstract

In recent years, food waste management has become one of the key challenges faced by modern society. The significant ecological footprint left by this type of waste can be mitigated through proper valorization. Directing food waste towards the production of biopolymers has attracted considerable attention from researchers. Plant- and animal-based by-products from the food industry are the valuable materials which can be utilized for the production of biopolymer-based films. Although the use of food waste in biopolymer film production holds great potential, various factors such as the type of source and extraction methods significantly affect the physicochemical properties of the films. With the addition of various compounds that enhance their antioxidant and antimicrobial effects, these films can prolong the freshness and safety of packaged products, making them comparable to plastic derived from fossil fuels. This review highlights the potential of biopolymers from food waste for the production of biopolymer-based films and the possibilities of their modification in order to improve their properties for use in the food packaging industry.

1. Introduction

In recent years, modern society has been confronted with significant challenges in waste material management. The food industry generates significant amounts of waste and unused by-products which, when improperly handled and disposed, can result in substantial environmental damage through greenhouse gas emissions [1,2]. According to data of the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), approximately one-third of global food production is annually lost as food industry waste, which adds up to 1.3 billion tons annually [3,4]. The amount of food waste is higher in developed countries than in underdeveloped countries due to higher consumption.
An optimal strategy through which to mitigate this problem involves the valorization of waste into products such as animal feed or fertilizers [5,6]. Additionally, food industry waste has considerable potential for bioenergy production [7]. It also presents a valuable source for the extraction of numerous compounds, including polysaccharides, proteins, lipids, and micronutrients [8]. The development of innovative solutions for the treatment and utilization of food waste is in line with the principles of the circular economy [9].
FAO data (2024) [10] indicate that food waste and by-products from the agri-food industry show great potential as sources of biopolymeric materials for the production of biopolymer-based food packaging films. Biopolymers, obtained from natural sources such as plant residues, food waste, or microorganisms, present a sustainable alternative to petroleum-based polymers. Their application in packaging has a critical role in the consumer supply chain by significantly reducing the use of non-renewable resources and mitigating environmental impact [11,12]. However, the use of food waste to obtain biopolymers poses a major challenge that requires thorough research. The type of source, method, and conditions of biopolymer extraction significantly influence the characteristics of biopolymer-based films. Biopolymer-based films can provide protection to food products by controlling gas transmission. Since these biopolymers can be used as carriers of functional agents, biopolymer-based films may exhibit notable antioxidant and antimicrobial potential [13].
At the same time, food safety remains a primary concern for both producers and consumers, driving increased attention toward the development of packaging systems that ensure product safety and extended shelf life keeping the sustainable development principles [14]. Conventional plastics used in packaging today are derived from non-renewable resources. Their low production cost and wide application have led to extensive use; however, growing consumer awareness of their environmental impact raises concern due to their poor biodegradability, which contributes to long-term environmental pollution. Moreover, the depletion of non-renewable resources directs attention toward alternative solutions [11].
This study reviews the potential of food industry waste as a source for biopolymer extraction intended for the production of biopolymer-based packaging films. Special attention is given to biopolymers derived from plant residues, by-products from fruit and vegetable processing, and those from marine organisms. The aim is to emphasize their functionality and the possibility of modification by adding active components that enhance food freshness and safety. Understanding the physicochemical properties of these biopolymers is crucial for designing films that meet the requirements of the food industry in terms of protection, strength, and permeability.

2. Search Strategy and Methodology

For the purpose of this study, scientific studies published in English between 2016 and 2025 were used, and they were collected from three relevant databases: Google Scholar (GS), Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS). The “all fields” search option was applied in all databases to ensure the inclusion of all potentially relevant information. In Google Scholar, the search was conducted using the keywords “food waste,” “biodegradable films,” and “biopolymer-based,” which resulted in a total of 886 records. The same keywords were used in the Scopus database, yielding 484 records. In Web of Science, the keywords “food waste” and “biodegradable films” were used, resulting in 187 articles. All search results were manually screened and selected based on their relevance to the topic, specifically isolation of biopolymers and characterization of produced biopolymer-based films. A total of 25 articles were used to compile a tabular overview of biopolymer sources, extraction methods, as well as the functional and environmental characteristics of biopolymer-based materials.

3. Biopolymer-Based Films

Food packaging represents a crucial segment of the food industry, serving not only a protective function but also influencing the quality of food along the “farm-to-fork” chain. The main challenge in the production of food packaging is in development of methods to meet market demand for high-quality products free of chemical preservatives without compromising product quality and safety. Biopolymer-based films have demonstrated great potential in addressing these challenges; they are thin, solid membranes (up to 0.3 mm thick) used to coat food products to preserve their properties. This prevents the product’s instability and the deterioration of sensory characteristics and thereby maintains freshness and extends shelf life. In addition to protection, certain properties such as appearance, texture, and flavor can also be enhanced [15,16]. Depending on the film’s composition, the product’s nutritional properties may also be positively influenced [17]. Given their biodegradability, this form of food packaging also contributes positively to environmental conservation.
The primary component of biopolymer-based films is a biopolymer matrix that forms a continuous and cohesive layer [18]. Polysaccharides, proteins, and lipids are commonly used as biopolymeric matrices. Films based on polysaccharide or protein matrices exhibit good mechanical properties but generally have poor barrier properties. In contrast, lipids provide excellent barrier properties but are rarely used alone in film production due to their tendency to form fragile films with poor mechanical strength. Therefore, lipids are typically incorporated into polysaccharide- or protein-based films [19,20].
In addition to the biopolymer matrix, various additives are often introduced to adjust mechanical and barrier characteristics; for example, plasticizers play a crucial role in reducing fragility [18]. Plasticizers are typically colorless and odorless substances that do not affect the transparency or sensory properties of the films. By disrupting polymer–polymer interactions and promoting polymer–plasticizer interactions, plasticizers enhance film flexibility, increasing elongation at break while decreasing tensile strength and elastic modulus. They also increase water vapor permeability [19].
Glycerol is one of the most commonly used plasticizers [21,22,23,24,25], as it produces smooth, transparent, and flexible films with good mechanical properties. Other plasticizers, such as polyols, glycols, and sugars, are also used; however, their effects differ. Glycol-based films tend to be rough and opaque with poor mechanical strength, while sugar-based plasticizers enhance mechanical strength and film extensibility [19].
Beyond plasticizers, other additives, such as probiotics, prebiotics, and plant extracts, are incorporated to modify hydrophilicity, improve mechanical and barrier properties, and impart antimicrobial and antioxidant functionality [18,26].

Biopolymers as Materials for Biopolymer-Based Film Production

The use of biopolymers as materials for film production is not a novel concept. Their application dates back to the mid-19th century, when a British chemist first created plastic materials from biocellulose. Biopolymers were for the first time employed in the production of biopolymer-based films during the 1980s [27]. Today, biopolymers represent the major area of research in the development of sustainable materials for food packaging, due to their potential to surpass the properties of petroleum-derived polymers. These polymers are distinguished by their environmental safety and sustainability. Their biodegradability represents a key advantage over conventional synthetic polymers commonly used in packaging.
However, despite the significant potential of biopolymers for use in biopolymer-based film production, their commercial manufacturing remains associated with high production costs. Consequently, recent research efforts have been focused on identifying inexpensive, renewable sources for biopolymer materials [1]. Table 1 provides an overview of biopolymers that can be applied in the production of biopolymer-based packaging, along with their properties.
Based on the available literature, it can be stated that the majority of film characteristics mainly depend on the type of biopolymer used. Films based on polysaccharides and proteins can have various limitations in use, which can be mitigated through the addition of different additives.
Research has shown that different types of the same biopolymer, as well as their combinations with other biopolymers, significantly affect the mechanical, barrier, and physical properties of the films. The formation of intermolecular bonds creates a compact network that ensures a relatively stable structure. In the case of carrageenan, a low number of sulfate groups in κ-carrageenan and the resulting negative charge lead to greater tensile strength in κ-carrageenan-based films compared to ι-carrageenan-based films [28]. The combination of rice starch and carrageenan has been found to negatively impact film strength. In the study conducted by Prasetyaningrum et al. (2024) [29], films with a higher proportion of carrageenan compared to rice starch exhibited greater tensile strength. The results showed that the best mechanical properties were observed in films made from a 1:1 ratio of starch and carrageenan, likely due to interactions between hydroxyl and carboxyl groups. Thanks to the linear arrangement of amylose in starch molecules, the number of available –OH groups capable of interacting with water is reduced; thus, the solubility of these films decreases as the starch content increases [29]. Water vapor permeability in carrageenan–starch films also declines with increased starch concentration. As starch concentration rises, strong bonds with carrageenan are formed, creating a dense network that reduces the space available for water molecule binding, leading to lower moisture content and reduced water vapor permeability [30].
In the case of starch combined with chitosan, films of high tensile strength were obtained, with tensile strength increasing with greater starch content due to the formation of a compact structure through intermolecular bonds between NH3+ groups of chitosan and OH groups of starch. However, an excessive amount of starch can disrupt these interactions, leading to the formation of intramolecular bonds within the starch chain, thus decreasing the tensile strength of the films [33]. Similarly, with an increased starch concentration, water vapor permeability decreased due to the compact network formed by chitosan–starch interactions. Nevertheless, when excessive starch concentration is present, permeability tends to increase again due to intramolecular bonding within the starch chains [44].
The addition of chitosan to protein-based films can significantly improve cohesion within the internal structure and enhance mechanical properties. Protein-based films often exhibit poor mechanical properties due to protein aggregation and void formation within the network [45]. According to Ghoshal and Kaur (2023) [25], increasing gelatin content relative to starch raised the moisture content and thickness of the films. Higher gelatin content also led to increased water vapor permeability. Conversely, increasing starch concentration reduced the moisture content in starch–gelatin-based films.
Some studies have shown that combining lipids with biopolymers can deteriorate the mechanical properties of films. The incorporation of essential oils into films may lead to a reduction in their tensile strength. For instance, the addition of clove oil reduced the tensile strength of starch-based films [24], while the addition of lemongrass oil decreased the tensile strength of starch- and alginate-based films [46]. This phenomenon can be explained by the disruption of strong intermolecular bonds between starch molecules [47] and the ability of essential oils to act as plasticizers [46].
In addition to affecting tensile strength, the addition of oils can also decrease the elongation force of films. In the study by Souza et al. (2013) [48], control starch-based films exhibited greater elongation force compared to films containing cinnamon oil.
On the other hand, the addition of lipids to biopolymer-based films can significantly improve their physical and barrier properties. Starch-based films generally exhibit low water vapor permeability. The incorporation of essential oils into starch-based films, as well as into other polysaccharide films, can lead to the formation of a compact structure through interactions between starch and polyphenols, resulting in reduced water vapor transmission through the film [24,49,50].
Increasing the concentration of lime essential oil in chitosan-based films leads to a decrease in the moisture content, solubility, and water vapor permeability of the films [36]. This behavior can be attributed to the hydrophobic nature of essential oils. Covalent bonds formed between hydroxyl and amino groups of polysaccharides and the essential oil chain reduce the films’ affinity for water molecules [51].
The study by Nisar et al. (2018) [39] demonstrated that only a limited amount of lipid, such as clove oil, can be added to pectin-based films, as excessive addition negatively affects their physical properties. The combination of oil and commercial pectin exhibited a low affinity for water molecules, resulting in significantly lower values for moisture content, swelling degree, and solubility compared to pectin films without oil. Furthermore, the reduction in water vapor permeability in pectin films with added clove oil can be explained by the formation of an additional lipid network within the biopolymeric matrix, interfering with the passage of water molecules through the film.
The incorporation of essential oils into biopolymer-based films can enhance the films’ functional properties, such as antioxidant and antimicrobial activities [24,36,39]. Film properties can also be significantly influenced by additives rich in polyphenols. The reaction between phenolic hydroxyl groups from natural extracts and the hydroxyl groups of biopolymers restricts the latter’s ability to interact with water [52].
In the case of carrageenan, the addition of Lapacho tea extract reduces moisture content [28], similar to the incorporation of coffee grounds [31]. Souza et al. (2007) [53] reported that polysaccharides derived from red algae, such as carrageenan, owing to their high sulfate group content, possess antioxidant activity. Moreover, these additives significantly enhance both the antioxidant and antimicrobial potential of carrageenan-based films.
The addition of black cumin extract to starch-based films increases their moisture content and solubility. As well as enhancing moisture content, certain extracts can also elevate water vapor transmission through the films [32,54].
According to the results of a study by Ekramian et al. (2020) [32], the addition of turmeric extract to chitosan-based films significantly increased their tensile strength and reduced water vapor permeability. Turmeric extract also led to increased moisture content and solubility of chitosan-based films. However, excessive concentrations of the extract resulted in decreased moisture content and solubility, a trend attributed to interactions between the biopolymer matrix and the phenolic components of the extract [55].
Gelatin-based films generally exhibit relatively good mechanical properties, according to the study by Hu et al. (2019) [40]. However, the addition of Ginkgo biloba extract resulted in an increase in the films’ tensile strength. Interactions between the amino groups of gelatin and the phenolic compounds in the extract enhanced the rigidity of the film. Due to the hydrophobic properties of Ginkgo biloba extract, its presence in the films led to decreased moisture content and water vapor permeability.
Plant extracts, similar to essential oils, can contribute to the functional properties of films [34,38,56]. According to the results of Orozco-Parra et al. (2020) [22], the addition of prebiotics such as fructooligosaccharides and inulin also influenced the reduction of films’ tensile strength. Inulin can function as a plasticizer in edible starch-based films, as indicated by the findings of this study. The addition of probiotic bacteria did not significantly affect the mechanical properties of the films while inulin increased water vapor transmission, due to its hygroscopic properties [22].
Overall, the addition of functional components has a substantial impact on the properties of biopolymer films. Understanding these interactions is essential for the further development of sustainable and functional materials for use in the food and pharmaceutical industries [56].

4. Food Industry Waste as a Source of Biopolymers

According to the definition by the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), food waste encompasses by-products and residues originating from households, canteens, hotels, restaurants, catering services, and various food industries. These materials are often difficult to reintegrate into production processes due to the high costs associated with such processes; therefore, they are mostly used as animal feed, compost, or fertilizer, while some end up in landfills—which is considered an environmentally unacceptable practice [57,58]. The main sectors generating food waste include the fish, meat, dairy, wine, fruit, and vegetable industries. The European Union has issued guidelines for managing food waste, which are based on the prevention of its generation, diversion for human consumption, use as animal feed, recovery, and integration into new industrial processes, with landfill disposal being the last resort [59].
Annual data on losses and the amount of food waste from the Food and Agriculture Organization [10] have attracted significant attention as a renewable resource for the production of polymer materials. Currently, the financial costs of producing biopolymers from conventional sources are considerably higher compared to plastic obtained from fossil fuels [60]. This has led to increasing interest in isolating biopolymers from unconventional sources. Given the high organic content in food waste—including polysaccharides, proteins, lipids, and various micronutrients—there is significant potential for further processing. By applying modern technologies, biopolymers can be isolated and extracted from food waste, which can then be used to produce biopolymer-based packaging due to their favorable physicochemical and mechanical properties [61]. Waste from the food industry represents a particularly attractive renewable resource in this context. Its integration into new industrial processes could not only yield financial savings and ecological benefits but could also promote production in line with the principles of the circular economy [62]. However, isolating biopolymers from food waste comes with a number of challenges that require further research to ensure that packaging made from these materials meets food safety requirements. The properties of this packaging depend on the physical and chemical characteristics of the biopolymer itself and the type of food industry waste from which it was isolated. By optimizing extraction processes and proper pretreatment, it is possible to obtain biopolymer-based packaging that represents a sustainable and ecological solution to reducing the use of conventional plastic packaging [63].
Waste from the meat and fish industry contains proteins such as gelatin, collagen, creatine, as well as the polysaccharide chitin. Biopolymers obtained from the meat and fish industry are highly significant in the development of biopolymer-based packaging, as they not only exhibit biocompatibility and functionality but also show gelling and water retention abilities [64,65]. Collagen is one of the most important extracellular proteins from the skin, bones, tendons, and cartilage of animals. It is crucial for the mechanical protection and regeneration of tissues and organs. This protein is colorless, with high elasticity and biodegradability, making it suitable for the production of biopolymer-based films [66,67,68]. Collagen is partially hydrolyzed to produce gelatin, a water-soluble protein that is widely used in the production of biopolymer-based films and coatings. It is obtained from bovine and pig skins and bones, as well as from fish industry waste [13]. Chitosan is another biopolymer that can be isolated from fish industry waste, most commonly through sequential extraction [69]. It is obtained by deacetylation of chitin, a biopolymer made of N-acetyl-β-D-glucosamine units linked by α (1→4) glycosidic bonds. Chitosan’s resistance to microorganisms and its high degree of biodegradation make it very interesting in the development of biopolymer-based films. Chitosan forms transparent and flexible films with good barrier properties [70,71].
The milk and dairy industry is one of the main sources of wastewater. The annual production of wastewater amounts to around 11 billion tons annually. The valorization of waste from the dairy industry would have significant ecological benefits. The waste generated during pasteurization, homogenization, and butter, cheese, and milk powder production may be an excellent source of proteins [72]. Whey, the main by-product of the dairy industry, is rarely processed in dairies. Due to its organic content, it exhibits high chemical and biological oxygen demand, making its disposal a major ecological issue [73]. Therefore, it is best to direct this type of waste towards isolating whey proteins [74]. Whey proteins can be used as biopolymers for producing biopolymer-based films, although these films show poor barrier and mechanical properties, so it is necessary to correct these properties using additives [74,75].
The fruit and vegetable industry also generates large amounts of waste in the form of peels, pulp, seeds, and damaged and unripe fruits. The valorization of this waste can be directed towards obtaining biopolymers. Inedible parts of plants such as seeds, roots, stems, leaves, and bracts, which are otherwise discarded during industrial processing, can be an excellent source of polysaccharides such as cellulose [76]. Cellulose is one of the most abundant biopolymers. It holds great potential for the development of biopolymer-based packaging due to its structure. The large number of hydrogen bonds in cellulose provides the good barrier properties of cellulose-based films; however, its high hydrophilicity negatively affects structural stability, requiring combination with other biopolymers [77]. Food waste from the fruit, vegetable, and grain industries is a good source of starch [78,79,80,81,82]. Starch is a polysaccharide whose composition varies depending on the source, but it usually consists of 15–30% amylose, a linear, insoluble molecule, and 70–85% amylopectin, a branched, soluble molecule. A higher amylopectin content improves the adhesive properties of starch, while amylose contributes to its gelatinization ability. Thanks to characteristics such as transparency, lack of odor and taste, and good mechanical properties, starch can rival most fossil fuel-derived polymers used in packaging production. The barrier properties of starch-based films are limited, and combination with other materials is required to improve these characteristics [83]. One of the most abundant polysaccharides in plant cell walls is pectin. Pectin is a polysaccharide rich in galacturonic acid, which constitutes about 70% of this polymer. Pectin can be isolated from food waste such as citrus peels, peelings of quinces, leeks, cabbage, green beans, beets, parsley roots, apple peels, carrots, and watermelon [84,85,86,87]. Biopolymer-based films based on pectin exhibit good antimicrobial and antioxidant characteristics, as well as good mechanical properties [69].

Review of Biopolymers Isolated from Different Types of Food Industry Waste

Numerous studies confirm that biopolymer-based packaging can be successfully produced based on biopolymers isolated from food industry waste. Table 2 presents an overview of biopolymers isolated from food industry waste and used in packaging film production.
In searching for sustainable and eco-friendly materials, biopolymer-based films derived from proteins and polysaccharides isolated from food industry waste have attracted increasing research attention. Their application in packaging can contribute to reducing the use of synthetic polymers while simultaneously enhancing the functional properties of packaging materials. Chitosan, pectin, starch, and cellulose from food industry waste have demonstrated significant potential for forming films with improved mechanical, barrier, and antimicrobial properties. By combining these biopolymers with various additives, it is possible to optimize their characteristics, thus opening up opportunities for the development of advanced biopolymer-based packaging materials.
Chitosan extracted by sequential extraction from crab shell waste has a high degree of deacetylation, up to 92%, and a large number of free amino groups, contributing to improved physicochemical, mechanical, and antimicrobial properties of the films in the study by Do Vale et al. (2020) [69]. The addition of glycerol enhanced the films’ flexibility but also increased their water vapor permeability. The results of this study indicated the dependence of the films’ strength and flexibility on the ratio of biopolymers and plasticizers. Films with a higher chitosan concentration had higher tensile strength, reaching 28.88 MPa, while the elongation at break was relatively low (37.59%). Reducing the chitosan concentration resulted in a decrease in tensile strength (1.72 MPa) and an increase in elongation at break (58.48%). The results of Ahmed et al. (2025) [88] indicate that the addition of polyvinyl alcohol and gelatin to chitosan-based films improved their mechanical properties, with tensile strength reaching 53.37 MPa and elongation at 44.12%. These films also showed high thermal stability and biodegradability, while zinc oxide nanoparticles enhanced their antimicrobial activity. Conversely, Baron et al. (2017) [89] obtained chitosan with a lower degree of deacetylation of 80.8%. When combined with pectin isolated from orange peels in various ratios, the resulting films exhibited high tensile strength and flexibility. Since chitosan tends to produce brittle films with high tensile strength, pectin acted as a plasticizer in this context. Pectin also contributed to the films’ hydrophilicity, whereas chitosan improved barrier properties. Due to impurities in the isolated biopolymers, the films had a darker coloration. Pectin isolated from food industry waste exhibited a lower degree of esterification compared to commercial pectin [89,90]. Dash et al. (2019) [90] demonstrated that pectin obtained via microwave-assisted extraction from lemon peels acted as a complementary component within the starch matrix, enhancing the strength and compactness of the film. The binding of nano-titania particles to pectin improved the barrier properties of starch–pectin films. The films based on pectin from Passiflora tripartita var. mollissima showed good mechanical stability and low water vapor permeability [92]. Reichembach et al., in 2024 [91], showed that pectin from Coffea arabica pulp produces films with better properties compared to pectin from residual coffee water. The study of Vallejos-Jiménez et al. (2025) [93] showed that the films based on pectin from Arabica coffee mucilage and pulp exhibited poor mechanical properties and high solubility. The addition of cellulose and spent coffee ground extract led to improved mechanical performance, better biodegradability, and moderate solubility.
Research conducted by Charles et al. (2022) [95] showed that starch isolated from potato peels, combined with carboxymethyl cellulose, produced biopolymer-based films with high thermal stability but poor mechanical properties. The starch isolated from potato peel had an amylose content of 29.49%, higher than that of commercial starch. Due to its higher molecular weight, this starch exhibited stronger intermolecular interactions with carboxymethyl cellulose, reducing water absorption in the films. The denser network structure resulted in reduced film solubility (18.86%) and lower water vapor permeability (0.05 g mm/m2 day kPa). However, there was a noticeable drop in the tensile strength of the films as the starch concentration increased from 58.83 MPa to 9.23 MPa, while elongation was almost halved (15.04%). On the other hand, starch isolated from cassava peels, when combined with appropriate additives such as chitosan [96], formed films with good mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties. According to the results by Dasumiati et al. (2019) [96], increasing the concentration of chitosan led to increased elongation (94.25%) and tensile strength (27.41 kgf/cm2) of starch-based films. In the study conducted by Karki et al. (2020) [98], starch was successfully isolated from potato waste collected from various geographical regions and subsequently used for the production of biopolymer-based films with different modifications and concentrations of plasticizers. The yield and moisture content of the isolated starch varied depending on the type of raw material, its physical condition, and place of origin. For film preparation, different types of starch were used, treated in three ways: native starch, hydrothermally treated starch, and acid–alcohol-treated starch. These treatments significantly influenced the structure and functional properties of the starch and, consequently, the characteristics of the resulting films. Hydrothermal treatment resulted in improved barrier properties and reduced solubility of the films. On the other hand, the acid–alcohol treatment led to partial degradation of the starch chains, resulting in films with increased transparency and elasticity but slightly lower mechanical strength [98]. Gonçalves et al. (2020) [97] suggested that films based on starch derived from potato chip by-products showed higher flexibility but lower tensile strength compared to films based on commercial starch. These results indicate that potato chip by-products can be used as a raw material for producing starch films with improved plastic properties.
Bigi et al. (2023) [99] isolated cellulose from orange peels. In combination with chitosan and laurylamine oxide, the resulting films exhibited high mechanical strength (38.1 MPa) and flexibility (27.8%) due to interactions between cellulose hydroxyl groups and the chitosan matrix through hydrogen bonding. The cellulose from orange peels also showed a synergistic effect with laurylamine oxide, leading to controlled release of laurylamine oxide and subsequently high antimicrobial potential of the film. Similarly, Wichaphian et al. (2025) [101] found that the addition of zinc oxide nanoparticles decreased transparency in composite films. These films had a very low tensile strength (4.38 MPa) and high flexibility (122.89%). However, when combined with mushroom powder, pretreated cellulose, and carboxymethyl cellulose, zinc oxide nanoparticles improved the mechanical properties of the films. Mushroom powder and zinc oxide nanoparticles enhanced the antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of the films through a synergistic effect. Additionally, cellulose isolated from pea husks and applied as nanocrystals combined with carboxymethyl cellulose improved film compatibility and distribution within the biopolymeric matrix. FTIR analysis confirmed interactions between cellulose nanocrystals and carboxymethyl cellulose, resulting in greater film stability. Increasing nanocrystal concentrations reduced transparency but enhanced mechanical strength (32.95 MPa) and barrier properties (4.3 g m/m2 Pa s) [100]. Films based on cellulose nanocrystals from mango waste, combined with chitosan, exhibited high tensile strength and flexibility. The good antifungal effect of the film can be attributed to the presence of chitosan [102].
Collagen-based films extracted by enzymatic methods from chicken skin combined with chitosan exhibited relatively good mechanical properties. As the concentration of collagen increased, the tensile strength decreased from 36.88 MPa to 20.46 MPa, but the film’s flexibility improved from 23.20% to 29.82%. Collagen improved the UV barrier properties and reduced water vapor permeability from 3.48 to 1.96. The increased number of peptide chains in the matrix and higher degree of compaction contributed to an increase in film thickness from 49.50 μm to 34.00 μm [103]. Similarly, the results of the research by Said et al. (2016) [104] show that the concentration of collagen isolated from the chicken skin significantly affects the mechanical properties of the films. Increasing the collagen concentration leads to an increase in the number of hydrophilic components in the film, which results in the formation of a stronger film structure. This, in turn, leads to a decrease in tensile strength from 5.265 MPa to 2.277 MPa and an increase in water vapor permeability. These deficiencies in collagen-based films can be corrected by adding plasticizers such as glycerol [104]. Wang and Wang (2017) [42] reported that an increased concentration of sodium alginate in collagen-based films led to higher tensile strength but reduced elasticity. Films based on collagen extracted from fish skin, combined with chitosan and pomegranate peel extract, showed reduced solubility compared to films without these additives. Films based solely on collagen did not exhibit antimicrobial activity [105]. These findings highlight the synergistic effects of chitosan and pomegranate peel extract reflected in improving antimicrobial properties and structural stability of film properties.
The study conducted by Nazmi et al. (2017) [108] showed that films based on bovine gelatin and carboxymethyl cellulose exhibited better mechanical properties (11.80 MPa tensile strength) compared to films based on chicken skin-derived gelatin and carboxymethyl cellulose (5.53 MPa tensile strength). Ratna et al. (2023) [109] showed that the addition of CMC improves the mechanical properties of gelatin-based films but compromises their physical and barrier properties. This result is attributed to differences in the amino acid composition between gelatins from different sources. In addition to inferior mechanical properties, films based on chicken skin-derived gelatin with carboxymethyl cellulose showed significantly poorer barrier properties compared to those without carboxymethyl cellulose. However, no significant differences in water vapor permeability were found when compared to bovine gelatin films with carboxymethyl cellulose, suggesting that any permeability increase could be attributed to the presence of carboxymethyl cellulose rather than the type of gelatin. A possible explanation lies in the expansion of free volume within the matrix caused by the addition of carboxymethyl cellulose, facilitating water absorption through the film [111]. In the study conducted by Loo et al. (2020) [107], films based on gelatin isolated from chicken skin showed higher solubility (94%) compared to films containing various concentrations of commercial starch (83–88%). This effect of starch addition can be explained by the interaction between the amide groups of gelatin and the hydroxyl groups of starch, causing molecular rearrangements that prevent gelatin from interacting with water [112]. In gelatin-based films produced from fish skin, the addition of the antioxidants butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and α-tocopherol reduced the mechanical properties of the films. This suggests that antioxidants can influence molecular interactions within the gelatin matrix, affecting film elasticity and strength. Other authors [108,113] reported that the addition of palm oil as well as essential oils of oregano and clove significantly improved the antioxidant and antimicrobial potential of gelatin-based films from fish skin. Similarly, the addition of coconut oil to gelatin-based films from chicken skin significantly improved their barrier and mechanical properties. This improvement was attributed to increased hydrophobicity, resulting in lower water vapor permeability and greater flexibility [110].
Based on the reviewed studies, it can be concluded that the mechanical, barrier, and physical properties of biopolymer-based films vary significantly depending on the type of biopolymer used and the added components. Chitosan is one of the strongest biopolymers in terms of mechanical properties, particularly tensile strength, but its rigidity can cause limitations without the addition of plasticizers. On the other hand, starch exhibits good thermal stability and low water vapor permeability, but on its own, it lacks sufficient strength and elasticity, making it more suitable in combination with other biopolymers. Pectin offers a significant advantage due to its flexibility and plasticizing function, but its pronounced hydrophilicity negatively affects barrier properties unless combined with other biopolymers such as chitosan or cellulose. Cellulose nanocrystals, although they reduce transparency, significantly improve mechanical strength and barrier performance, making them excellent reinforcements in composite films. In the case of collagen, it is interesting to note that increasing its concentration improves flexibility but compromises strength, while additives such as chitosan and plant extracts can mitigate these shortcomings. Gelatin appears to be the most unstable in terms of barrier properties, especially when combined with CMC, although the inclusion of plant oils can enhance its functionality. Overall, it can be said that no single biopolymer fully meets the requirements of biodegradable packaging on its own, but through carefully selected combinations, a balance between mechanical and barrier properties can be achieved. Future research should focus on optimizing the ratio between biopolymers and plasticizers, selecting appropriate sources of biopolymers, and controlling their purity and extraction methods, as all of these factors directly influence the final performance of the film.

5. Environmental and Economic Aspects and the Sustainability of Using Food Industry Waste for Biopolymer Isolation

Utilizing food industry waste for the production of biopolymers represents an ecologically sustainable approach. Converting food industry waste into raw materials for the production of biopolymers intended for biopolymer-based packaging offers numerous benefits [114]. Primarily, this process offers a solution to the growing global problem of food waste disposal. As the global population continues to increase, the amount of food industry waste rises, along with the need for greater food production. Thus, integrating food industry waste into new industrial processes has become a necessity. Improper waste disposal promotes microbial contamination and the spread of diseases. Moreover, the decomposition of food industry waste leads to the emission of greenhouse gases, contributing to severe environmental problems. Wastewater from the food industry often ends up in waterways. Its high organic content results in elevated BOD and COD values, potentially leading to eutrophication—a process in which water bodies become enriched with nutrients, promoting excessive algal growth and causing oxygen depletion that harms aquatic life [1,73].
Innovative solutions that replace fossil fuel-derived plastics are urgently needed. The production of packaging materials from renewable, biodegradable resources that protect minimally processed foods will become imperative in the coming years. Food industry waste is an excellent raw material for isolating biopolymers that can be used either alone or combined with other materials to produce biopolymer-based packaging [114,115].
Isolating biopolymers from food industry waste not only aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals but also facilitates the implementation of the circular economy concept, leading to various environmental and economic benefits. The circular economy emphasizes reducing waste by transforming it into valuable products and preserving resources through recycling and reuse [116,117].
However, despite its promising outlook, this approach faces certain challenges. Biopolymers often have inadequate mechanical properties, low stability, and a short shelf life, necessitating additional treatments and the use of diverse technologies and materials. Variations in raw material availability or insufficient supply pose additional barriers to scaling up biopolymer production from food waste to industrial levels [1]. Intensive research, which is ongoing, may lead to promising and innovative solutions to this problem.

6. Conclusions

The review underlines the potential of food industry waste as a source of biopolymers for biopolymer-based packaging films. Commonly studied biopolymers, including starch, pectin, chitosan, gelatin, cellulose, and whey proteins, can be extracted or fortified with the utilization of various food industry by-products. These biopolymers exhibit diverse functional properties that can be improved by the incorporation of additives such as essential oils, plant extracts, or nanoparticles to enhance mechanical strength, barrier performance, and antimicrobial activity. The mechanical properties of the films vary based on composition and treatment. Tensile strength ranges from 5 to 50 MPa depending on the polymer and additives used, while water vapor permeability and solubility are influenced by the molecular structure and hydrophilicity of the films. However, more detailed quantitative data—such as extraction yields, concentrations of biopolymer solutions, and structural characteristics e.g., crystallinity and microscopic properties (determined via SEM and FTIR)—remain limited across studies. To ensure industrial applicability, future research should focus on standardizing extraction conditions, ensuring better reproducibility of experiments. In addition, the economic aspect of biopolymer extraction and film production from food industry waste should also be thoroughly analyzed to assess the feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and potential for large-scale implementation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: B.D. and I.K.; methodology D.D.; writing—original draft preparation, K.C. and S.D.; writing—review and editing, B.D. and D.D.; visualization, S.D.; supervision, B.D. and I.K.; funding acquisition, D.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovations of the Republic of Serbia, grant numbers 451-03-137/2025-03/200133.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sharma, P.; Gaur, V.; Sirohi, R.; Varjani, S.; Kim, S.H.; Wong, J. Sustainable Processing of Food Waste for Production of Bio-Based Products for Circular Bioeconomy. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 325, 124684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Roy, A.; Chakraborty, S. A Comprehensive Review on Sustainable Approach for Microbial Degradation of Plastic and Its Challenges. Sustain. Chem. Environ. 2024, 7, 100153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rukikaire, K.; Loran, S. Tackling Food Loss and Waste: A Triple Win Opportunity; Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 2022; Available online: https://www.fao.org/newsroom/detail/FAO-UNEP-agriculture-environment-food-loss-waste-day-2022/en (accessed on 11 March 2025).
  4. FAO. Global Food Losses and Food Waste—Extent, Causes and Prevention; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2011; Available online: https://www.fao.org/4/mb060e/mb060e.pdf (accessed on 11 March 2025).
  5. Nath, P.C.; Ojha, A.; Debnath, S.; Sharma, M.; Nayak, P.K.; Sridhar, K.; Inbaraj, B.S. Valorization of Food Waste as Animal Feed: A Step towards Sustainable Food Waste Management and Circular Bioeconomy. Animals 2023, 13, 1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Du, C.; Abdullah, J.J.; Greetham, D.; Fu, D.; Yu, M.; Ren, L.; Li, S.; Lu, D. Valorization of Food Waste into Biofertiliser and Its Field Application. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 187, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jarunglumlert, T.; Bampenrat, A.; Sukkathanyawat, H.; Prommuak, C. Enhanced Energy Recovery from Food Waste by Co-Production of Bioethanol and Biomethane Process. Fermentation 2021, 7, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tropea, A. Food Waste Valorization. Fermentation 2022, 8, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, Z.; de Souza, T.S.P.; Holland, B.; Dunshea, F.; Barrow, C.; Suleria, H.A.R. Valorization of Food Waste to Produce Value-Added Products Based on Its Bioactive Compounds. Processes 2023, 11, 840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. FAO. Platform on Food Loss and Waste. 2024. Available online: https://www.fao.org/platform-food-loss-waste/flw-data/en/ (accessed on 18 April 2025).
  11. Ncube, L.K.; Ude, A.U.; Ogunmuyiwa, E.N.; Zulkifli, R.; Beas, I.N. Environmental Impact of Food Packaging Materials: A Review of Contemporary Development from Conventional Plastics to Polylactic Acid Based Materials. Materials 2020, 13, 4994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yadav, A.; Kumar, N.; Upadhyay, A.; Pratibha; Anurag, R.K. Edible Packaging from Fruit Processing Waste: A Comprehensive Review. Food Rev. Int. 2021, 39, 2075–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Marotta, A.; Borriello, A.; Khan, M.R.; Cavella, S.; Ambrogi, V.; Torrieri, E. Boosting Food Packaging Sustainability through the Valorization of Agri-Food Waste and By-Products. Polymers 2025, 17, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Barzan, G.; Sacco, A.; Giovannozzi, A.M.; Portesi, C.; Schiavone, C.; Salafranca, J.; Wrona, M.; Nerín, C.; Rossi, A.M. Development of Innovative Antioxidant Food Packaging Systems Based on Natural Extracts from Food Industry Waste and Moringa oleifera Leaves. Food Chem. 2024, 432, 137088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Matloob, A.; Ayub, H.; Mohsin, M.; Ambreen, S.; Khan, F.A.; Oranab, S.; Rahim, M.A.; Khalid, W.; Nayik, G.A.; Ramniwas, S.; et al. A Review on Edible Coatings and Films: Advances, Composition, Production Methods, and Safety Concerns. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 28932–28944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gaspar, M.C.; Braga, M. Edible Films and Coatings Based on Agrifood Residues: A New Trend in the Food Packaging Research. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2023, 50, 101006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gan, L.; Jiang, G.; Yang, Y.; Zheng, B.; Zhang, S.; Li, X.; Tian, Y.; Peng, B. Development and Characterization of Levan/Pullulan/Chitosan Edible Films Enriched with ε-Polylysine for Active Food Packaging. Food Chem. 2022, 388, 132989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Azeredo, H.M.C.; Morrugares-Carmona, R.; Wellner, N.; Cross, K.; Bajka, B.; Waldron, K.W. Development of Pectin Films with Pomegranate Juice and Citric Acid. Food Chem. 2016, 198, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jeya Jeevahan, J.; Chandrasekaran, M.; Venkatesan, S.P.; Sriram, V.; Britto, J.G.; Mageshwaran, G.; Durairaj, R.B. Scaling Up Difficulties and Commercial Aspects of Edible Films for Food Packaging: A Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 100, 210–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Susmita Devi, L.; Jaiswal, A.K.; Jaiswal, S. Lipid incorporated biopolymer based edible films and coatings in food packaging: A review. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2024, 8, 100720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zabihollahi, N.; Alizadeh, A.; Almasi, H.; Hanifian, S.; Hamishekar, H. Development and Characterization of Carboxymethyl Cellulose Based Probiotic Nanocomposite Film Containing Cellulose Nanofiber and Inulin for Chicken Fillet Shelf Life Extension. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 160, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Orozco-Parra, J.; Mejía, C.M.; Villa, C.C. Development of a Bioactive Synbiotic Edible Film Based on Cassava Starch, Inulin, and Lactobacillus casei. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 104, 105754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bersaneti, G.T.; Prudencio, S.H.; Mali, S.; Pedrine Colabone Celligoi, M.A. Assessment of a New Edible Film Biodegradable Based on Starch-Nystose to Increase Quality and the Shelf Life of Blackberries. Food Biosci. 2021, 42, 101173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Al-Hashimi, A.G.; Ammar, A.B.; G., L.; Cacciola, F.; Lakhssassi, N. Development of a Millet Starch Edible Film Containing Clove Essential Oil. Foods 2020, 9, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ghoshal, G.; Kaur, M. Optimization of Extraction of Starch from Sweet Potato and Its Application in Making Edible Film. Food Chem. Adv. 2023, 3, 100356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Aayush, K.; McClements, D.J.; Sharma, S.; Sharma, R.; Singh, G.P.; Sharma, K.; Oberoi, K. Innovations in the Development and Application of Edible Coatings for Fresh and Minimally Processed Apple. Food Control 2022, 141, 109188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tim, A.O.; Sylvana, G.R. History of Sustainable Bio-Based Polymers. In A Handbook of Applied Biopolymer Technology: Synthesis, Degradation and Applications; Sanjay, K.S., Ackmez, M., Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2011; pp. 1–123. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jancikova, S.; Dordevic, D.; Sedlacek, P.; Nejezchlebova, M.; Treml, J.; Tremlova, B. Edible Films from Carrageenan/Orange Essential Oil/Trehalose—Structure, Optical Properties, and Antimicrobial Activity. Polymers 2021, 13, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Prasetyaningrum, A.; Jos, B.; Ariyanti, D.; Handayani, N.; Rohmah, S.; Syawaldi, F.; Fauzi, H.H.; Hakiim, A.A.; Ashianti, A.D. Effect of Concentration of Kappa-Carrageenan on the Physico-Chemical Properties of Rice Starch Film. Food Res. 2024, 8, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Giyatmi, S.; Melanie, S.; Fransiska, D.; Darmawan, M.; Irianto, H. Barrier and Physical Properties of Arrowroot Starch-Carrageenan Based Biofilms. J. Bio-Sci. 2018, 25, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dordevic, S.; Dordevic, D.; Danilović, B.; Tremlova, B.; Gablo, N. Development of Edible/Biodegradable Packaging Based on κ-Carrageenan with Spent Coffee Grounds as Active Additives. Adv. Technol. 2023, 12, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ekramian, S.; Abbaspour, H.; Roudi, B.; Amjad, L.; Nafchi, A.M. Influence of Nigella sativa L. Extract on Physico-Mechanical and Antimicrobial Properties of Sago Starch Film. J. Polym. Environ. 2021, 29, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zheng, K.; Xiao, S.; Li, W.; Wang, W.; Chen, H.; Yang, F.; Qin, C. Chitosan–Acorn Starch–Eugenol Edible Film: Physico-Chemical, Barrier, Antimicrobial, Antioxidant and Structural Properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 135, 344–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rachtanapun, P.; Klunklin, W.; Jantrawut, P.; Jantanasakulwong, K.; Phimolsiripol, Y.; Seesuriyachan, P.; Leksawasdi, N.; Chaiyaso, T.; Ruksiriwanich, W.; Phongthai, S.; et al. Characterization of Chitosan Film Incorporated with Curcumin Extract. Polymers 2021, 13, 963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Oberlintner, A.; Bajić, M.; Kalčíková, G.; Likozar, B.; Novak, U. Biodegradability Study of Active Chitosan Biopolymer Films Enriched with Quercus Polyphenol Extract in Different Soil Types. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 21, 101318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Filho, J.G.d.O.; de Deus, I.P.B.; Valadares, A.C.F.; Fernandes, C.C.; Estevam, E.B.B.; Egea, M.B. Chitosan Film with Citrus limonia Essential Oil: Physical and Morphological Properties and Antibacterial Activity. Colloids Interfaces 2020, 4, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mirzaei-Mohkam, A.; Garavand, F.; Dehnad, D.; Keramat, J.; Nasirpour, A. Physical, Mechanical, Thermal and Structural Characteristics of Nanoencapsulated Vitamin E Loaded Carboxymethyl Cellulose Films. Prog. Org. Coat. 2020, 138, 105383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rodsamran, P.; Sothornvit, R. Preparation and Characterization of Pectin Fraction from Pineapple Peel as a Natural Plasticizer and Material for Biopolymer Film. Food Bioprod. Process. 2019, 118, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nisar, T.; Wang, Z.-C.; Yang, X.; Tian, Y.; Iqbal, M.; Guo, Y. Characterization of Citrus Pectin Films Integrated with Clove Bud Essential Oil: Physical, Thermal, Barrier, Antioxidant, and Antibacterial Properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 106, 670–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hua, X.; Yuan, L.; Han, L.; Li, S.; Song, L. Characterization of Antioxidant and Antibacterial Gelatin Films Incorporated with Ginkgo biloba Extract. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 27449–27454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Soo, P.Y.; Sarbon, N.M. Preparation and Characterization of Edible Chicken Skin Gelatin Film Incorporated with Rice Flour. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2018, 15, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, Z.; Hu, S.; Wang, H. Scale-Up Preparation and Characterization of Collagen/Sodium Alginate Blend Films. J. Food Qual. 2017, 2017, 4954259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wagh, Y.R.; Pushpadass, H.A.; Eljeeva, F.M.; Nath, B.S. Preparation and Characterization of Milk Protein Films and Their Application for Packaging of Cheddar Cheese. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 3767–3775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Dang, K.M.; Yoksan, R. Morphological Characteristics and Barrier Properties of Thermoplastic Starch/Chitosan Blown Film. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 150, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ben Slimane, E.; Sadok, S. Collagen from Cartilaginous Fish By-Products for a Potential Application in Bioactive Film Composite. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Maizura, M.; Fazilah, A.; Norziah, M.H.; Karim, A.A. Antibacterial Activity and Mechanical Properties of Partially Hydrolyzed Sago Starch–Alginate Edible Film Containing Lemongrass Oil. J. Food Sci. 2007, 72, C324–C330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Warkoyo, W.; Rahardjo, B.; Marseno, D.W.; Karyadi, J.N.W. Sifat Fisik, Mekanik dan Barrier Edible Film Berbasis Pati Umbi Kimpul (Xanthosoma sagittifolium) yang Diinkorporasi dengan Kalium Sorbat. Agritech 2014, 34, 72–81. Available online: https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/agritech/article/view/9525/7100 (accessed on 1 March 2025).
  48. Souza, A.C.; Goto, G.E.O.; Mainardi, J.A.; Coelho, A.C.V.; Tadini, C.C. Cassava Starch Composite Films Incorporated with Cinnamon Essential Oil: Antimicrobial Activity, Microstructure, Mechanical and Barrier Properties. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 54, 346–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shojaee-Aliabadi, S.; Hosseini, H.; Mohammadifar, M.A.; Mohammadi, A.; Ghasemlou, M.; Ojagh, S.M.; Khaksar, R. Characterization of Antioxidant-Antimicrobial κ-Carrageenan Films Containing Satureja hortensis Essential Oil. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 52, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Teixeira-Costa, B.; Andrade, C. Chitosan as a Valuable Biomolecule from Seafood Industry Waste in the Design of Green Food Packaging. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ojagh, S.M.; Rezaei, M.; Razavi, S.H.; Hosseini, S.M.H. Development and Evaluation of a Novel Biodegradable Film Made from Chitosan and Cinnamon Essential Oil with Low Affinity Toward Water. Food Chem. 2010, 122, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liu, Y.; Qin, Y.; Bai, R.; Zhang, X.; Yuan, L.; Liu, J. Preparation of pH-Sensitive and Antioxidant Packaging Films Based on κ-Carrageenan and Mulberry Polyphenolic Extract. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 134, 993–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. de Souza, M.C.R.; Marques, C.T.; Dore, C.M.G.; da Silva, F.R.F.; Rocha, H.A.O.; Leite, E.L. Antioxidant Activities of Sulfated Polysaccharides from Brown and Red Seaweeds. J. Appl. Phycol. 2007, 19, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Benavides, S.; Villalobos-Carvajal, R.; Reyes, J.E. Physical, Mechanical and Antibacterial Properties of Alginate Film: Effect of the Crosslinking Degree and Oregano Essential Oil Concentration. J. Food Eng. 2012, 110, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bitencourt, C.M.; Fávaro-Trindade, C.S.; Sobral, P.J.A.; Carvalho, R.A. Gelatin-Based Films Additivated with Curcuma Ethanol Extract: Antioxidant Activity and Physical Properties of Films. Food Hydrocoll. 2014, 40, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ganesh, K.S.; Sridhar, A.; Vishali, S. Utilization of Fruit and Vegetable Waste to Produce Value-Added Products: Conventional Utilization and Emerging Opportunities—A Review. Chemosphere 2021, 287, 132221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Koutinas, A.A.; Vlysidis, A.; Pleissner, D.; Kopsahelis, N.; Lopez Garcia, I.; Kookos, I.K.; Lin, C.S.K. Valorization of Industrial Waste and By-Product Streams via Fermentation for the Production of Chemicals and Biopolymers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 2587–2627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kavitha, S.; Yukesh, K.R.; Kumar, G.; Gunasekaran, M.; Rajesh, B.J. Introduction: Sources and Characterization of Food Waste and Food Industry Wastes. Food Waste Valuab. Resour. 2020, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. FoodDrinkEurope. Food Wastage Hierarchy. 2019. Available online: https://www.fooddrinkeurope.eu/our-actions/foodwaste-toolkit/food-wastage-hierarchy (accessed on 1 March 2025).
  60. Raza, Z.A.; Abid, S.; Banat, I.M. Polyhydroxyalkanoates: Characteristics, Production, Recent Developments and Applications. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2018, 126, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Routray, W.; Orsat, V. Plant By-Products and Food Industry Waste: A Source of Nutraceuticals and Biopolymers. In Food Bioconversion; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; pp. 279–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Shogren, R.; Wood, D.; Orts, W.; Glenn, G. Plant-Based Materials and Transitioning to a Circular Economy. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2019, 19, 194–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sirohi, R.; Pandey, J.P.; Gaur, V.K.; Gnansounou, E.; Sindhu, R. Critical Overview of Biomass Feedstocks as Sustainable Substrates for the Production of Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB). Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 311, 123536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Khodaei, D.; Álvarez, C.; Mullen, A.M. Biodegradable Packaging Materials from Animal Processing Co-Products and Wastes: An Overview. Polymers 2021, 13, 2561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Pérez-Andrés, J.M.; Álvarez, C.; Cullen, P.; Tiwari, B.K. Effect of Cold Plasma on the Techno-Functional Properties of Animal Protein Food Ingredients. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2019, 58, 102205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sorushanova, A.; Delgado, L.M.; Wu, Z.; Shologu, N.; Kshirsagar, A.; Raghunath, R.; Mullen, A.M.; Bayon, Y.; Pandit, A.; Raghunath, M.; et al. The Collagen Suprafamily: From Biosynthesis to Advanced Biomaterial Development. Adv. Mater. 2018, 31, e1801651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Seggiani, M.; Gigante, V.; Cinelli, P.; Coltelli, M.-B.; Sandroni, M.; Anguillesi, I.; Lazzeri, A. Processing and Mechanical Performances of Poly (Butylene Succinate–co–Adipate) (PBSA) and Raw Hydrolyzed Collagen (HC) Thermoplastic Blends. Polym. Test. 2019, 77, 105900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Scopel, B.S.; Lamers, D.L.; Matos, E.; Baldasso, C.; Dettmer, A. Collagen Hydrolysate Extraction from Chromed Leather Waste for Polymeric Film Production. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc. 2016, 111, 30–40. [Google Scholar]
  69. Do Vale, D.A.; Vieira, C.B.; Vidal, M.F.; Claudino, R.L.; Andrade, F.K.; Sousa, J.R.; de Souza, B.W.S. Chitosan-Based Edible Films Produced from Crab-Uçá Waste: Physicochemical, Mechanical and Antimicrobial Properties. J. Polym. Environ. 2020, 29, 694–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rai, S.; Dutta, P.K.; Mehrotra, G.K. Lignin Incorporated Antimicrobial Chitosan Film for Food Packaging Application. J. Polym. Mater. 2017, 34, 171–183. [Google Scholar]
  71. Shahid-Ul-Islam; Butola, B.S. Recent Advances in Chitosan Polysaccharide and Its Derivatives in Antimicrobial Modification of Textile Materials. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 121, 905–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tikariha, A.; Sahu, O. Study of Characteristics and Treatments of Dairy Industry Waste Water. J. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 2, 16–22. Available online: https://pubs.sciepub.com/jaem/2/1/4/index.html (accessed on 1 March 2025).
  73. Ostojić, S.; Pavlović, M.; Živić, M.; Filipović, Z.; Gorjanović, S.; Hranisavljević, S.; Dojčinović, M. Processing of Whey from Dairy Industry Waste. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2005, 3, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Dubey, N.K.; Dubey, R. Chapter 27—Edible Films and Coatings: An Update on Recent Advances. In Biopolymer-Based Formulations: Biomedical and Food Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 675–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kandasamy, S.; Yoo, J.; Yun, J.; Kang, H.-B.; Seol, K.-H.; Kim, H.-W.; Ham, J.-S. Application of Whey Protein-Based Edible Films and Coatings in Food Industries: An Updated Overview. Coatings 2021, 11, 1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Makroo, H.A.; Naqash, S.; Saxena, J.; Savita Sharma, D.; Majid, D.; Dara, B.N. Recovery and Characteristics of Starches from Unconventional Sources and Their Potential Applications: A Review. Appl. Food Res. 2021, 1, 100001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Jali, S.; Mohan, T.P.; Mwangi, F.M.; Kanny, K. A Review on Barrier Properties of Cellulose/Clay Nanocomposite Polymers for Packaging Applications. Polymers 2024, 16, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Sharmila, V.; Kavitha, S.; Obulisamy, P.K.; Banu, J.R. Production of Fine Chemicals from Food Wastes. In Food Waste to Valuable Resources; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 163–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hasanin, M.S. Simple, Economic, Ecofriendly Method to Extract Starch Nanoparticles from Potato Peel Waste for Biological Applications. Starch-Stärke 2021, 73, 2100005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kringel, D.H.; Dias, A.R.G.; Zavareze, E.d.R.; Gandra, E.A. Fruit Wastes as Promising Sources of Starch: Extraction, Properties, and Applications. Starch-Stärke 2020, 72, 1900200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hernández-Carmona, F.; Morales-Matos, Y.; Lambis-Miranda, H.; Pasqualino, J. Starch Extraction Potential from Plantain Peel Wastes. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 4980–4985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Dorantes-Fuertes, M.-G.; López-Méndez, M.C.; Martínez-Castellanos, G.; Meléndez-Armenta, R.Á.; Jiménez-Martínez, H.-E. Starch Extraction Methods in Tubers and Roots: A Systematic Review. Agronomy 2024, 14, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Tafaa, K.D.; Satheesh, N.; Abera, W. Mechanical Properties of Tef Starch-Based Edible Films: Development and Process Optimization. Heliyon 2023, 9, e13160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Marcon, M.V.; Vriesman, L.C.; Wosiacki, G.; Beleski-Carneiro, E.; Petkowicz, C.L.O. Pectins from Apple Pomace. Polímeros 2005, 15, 127–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Jafari, F.; Khodaiyan, F.; Kiani, H.; Hosseini, S.S. Pectin from Carrot Pomace: Optimization of Extraction and Physicochemical Properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 157, 1315–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Jayesree, N.; Hang, P.K.; Priyangaa, A.; Krishnamurthy, N.P.; Ramanan, R.N.; Turki, M.S.A.; Galanakis, C.M.; Ooi, C.W. Valorisation of Carrot Peel Waste by Water-Induced Hydrocolloidal Complexation for Extraction of Carotene and Pectin. Chemosphere 2021, 272, 129919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Petkowicz, C.L.O.; Vriesmann, L.C.; Williams, P.A. Pectins from Food Waste: Extraction, Characterization and Properties of Watermelon Rind Pectin. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 65, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ahmed, H.; Noyon, M.A.R.; Uddin, M.E.; Rafid, M.M.; Hosen, M.S.; Layek, R.K. Development and Characterization of Chitosan-Based Antimicrobial Films: A Sustainable Alternative to Plastic Packaging. Clean. Chem. Eng. 2025, 11, 100157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Baron, R.D.; Pérez, L.L.; Salcedo, J.M.; Córdoba, L.P.; Sobral, P.J.d.A. Production and Characterization of Films Based on Blends of Chitosan from Blue Crab (Callinectes Sapidus) Waste and Pectin from Orange (Citrus Sinensis Osbeck) Peel. Int. J. Biologi. Macromol. 2017, 98, 676–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Dash, K.K.; Ali, N.A.; Das, D.; Mohanta, D. Thorough Evaluation of Sweet Potato Starch and Lemon-Waste Pectin Based-Edible Films with Nano-Titania Inclusions for Food Packaging Applications. Int. J. Biologi. Macromol. 2019, 139, 449–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Reichembach, L.H.; Guerrero, P.; Petkowicz, C.L.d.O.; de la Caba, K. Valorization of Pectins from Coffee Wastes for the Development of Pectin-Chitosan Films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2024, 334, 122057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Rentería-Ortega, M.; Colín-Alvarez, M.d.L.; Gaona-Sánchez, V.A.; Chalapud, M.C.; García-Hernández, A.B.; León-Espinosa, E.B.; Valdespino-León, M.; Serrano-Villa, F.S.; Calderón-Domínguez, G. Characterization and Applications of the Pectin Extracted from the Peel of Passiflora tripartita var. mollissima. Membranes 2023, 13, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Vallejos-Jiménez, A.; Cadena-Chamorro, E.M.; Santa, J.F.; Buitrago-Sierra, R.; Dugmore, T.I.J.; Bose, S.; Matharu, A.S. Development of Novel Pectin-Based Films from Coffee Waste: Mucilage and Pulp. Waste Biomass Valorization 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Sood, A.; Saini, C.S. Red Pomelo Peel Pectin-Based Edible Composite Films: Effect of Pectin Incorporation on Mechanical, Structural, Morphological, and Thermal Properties of Composite Films. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 123, 107135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Charles, A.L.; Motsa, N.; Abdillah, A.A. A Comprehensive Characterization of Biodegradable Edible Films Based on Potato Peel Starch Plasticized with Glycerol. Polymers 2022, 14, 3462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Dasumiati, S.N.; Malik, M. Food Packaging Development of Bioplastic from Basic Waste of Cassava Peel and Shrimp Shell. In Proceedings of the Conference on Innovation in Technology and Engineering Science (CITES 2018), Padang, Indonesia, 8–9 November 2018; IOP Publishing Ltd.: Bristol, UK, 2019; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Gonçalves, I.; Lopes, J.; Barra, A.; Hernández, D.; Nunes, C.; Kapusniak, K.; Kapusniak, J.; Evtyugin, D.V.; Lopes da Silva, J.A.; Ferreira, P.; et al. Tailoring the Surface Properties and Flexibility of Starch-Based Films Using Oil and Waxes Recovered from Potato Chips Byproducts. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 163, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Karki, D.B.; Yadav, K.C.; Khanal, H.; Bhattarai, P.; Koirala, B.; Khatri, S.B. Analysis of Biodegradable Films of Starch from Potato Waste. Asian Food Sci. J. 2020, 14, 28–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Bigi, F.; Maurizzi, E.; Haghighi, H.; Siesler, H.W.; Licciardello, F.; Pulvirenti, A. Waste Orange Peels as a Source of Cellulose Nanocrystals and Their Use for the Development of Nanocomposite Films. Foods 2023, 12, 960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Li, H.; Shi, H.; He, Y.; Fei, X.; Peng, L. Preparation and Characterization of Carboxymethyl Cellulose-Based Composite Films Reinforced by Cellulose Nanocrystals Derived from Pea Hull Waste for Food Packaging Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 4104–4112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wichaphian, A.; Yasan, P.; Pathom-aree, W.; Lumyong, S.; Suwannarach, N.; Kumla, J.; Chaipoot, S.; Hoijang, S.; Krasian, T.; Worajittiphon, P.; et al. From Agricultural Waste to Active Films: Enhanced Crystallinity of Spent Mushroom Substrate-Derived Cellulose via Deep Eutectic Solvent-Based Microwave-Assisted Pretreatment and Its Application in Reinforcing CMC-Based Composite Films. J. Agric. Food Res. 2025, 20, 101759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Dey, A.; Dhumal, C.V.; Sengupta, P.; Kumar, A.; Pramanik, N.K.; Alam, T. Challenges and Possible Solutions to Mitigate the Problems of Single-Use Plastics Used for Packaging Food Items: A Review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 58, 3251–3269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ocak, B. Film-Forming Ability of Collagen Hydrolysate Extracted from Leather Solid Wastes with Chitosan. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 25, 4643–4655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Said, M.I.; Erwanto, Y.; Abustam, E. Properties of Edible Film Produced Using Combination of Collagen Extracts of Bligon Goatskin with Glycerol. Am. J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2016, 11, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Bhuimbar, M.V.; Bhagwat, P.K.; Dandge, P.B. Extraction and Characterization of Acid Soluble Collagen from Fish Waste: Development of Collagen-Chitosan Blend as Food Packaging Film. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 102983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Da Silva, C.G.; Rodrigues, A.S.; Lima, A.C.; Mello, R.O.; Morisso, F.D.P.; Dornelles, R.C.P.; Kubota, E.H. Gelatin Extracted from Jundiá Skin (Rhamdia quelen): An Alternative to the Discarded By-Product. Food Res. Int. 2022, 161, 111829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Loo, C.P.Y.; Sarbon, N.M. Chicken Skin Gelatin Films with Tapioca Starch. Food Biosci. 2020, 35, 100589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Nazmi, N.N.; Isa, M.I.N.; Sarbon, N.M. Preparation and Characterization of Chicken Skin Gelatin/CMC Composite Film as Compared to Bovine Gelatin Film. Food Biosci. 2017, 19, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ratna; Ulfariati, C.; Yusmanizar; Aprilia, S.; Rahmiati; Munawar, A.A. Development of Biocomposite Edible Film Food Packaging Based on Gelatin from Chicken Claw Waste. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2023, 8, 100371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Jusoha, N.A.M.; Isa, M.I.N.; Sarbon, N.M. Physical, Mechanical and Antioxidant Properties of Chicken Skin Gelatin Films Incorporated with Virgin Coconut Oil. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2022, 45, 102525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Tong, Q.; Xiao, Q.; Lim, L.-T. Preparation and Properties of Pullulan–Alginate–Carboxymethylcellulose Blend Films. Food Res. Int. 2008, 41, 1007–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Tongdeesoontorn, W.; Mauer, L.J.; Wongruong, S.; Sriburi, P.; Rachtanapun, P. Mechanical and Physical Properties of Cassava Starch–Gelatin Composite Films. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2012, 128, 778–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Jongjareonrak, A.; Benjakul, S.; Visessanguan, W.; Tanaka, M. Antioxidative Activity and Properties of Fish Skin Gelatin Films Incorporated with BHT and α-Tocopherol. Food Hydrocoll. 2008, 22, 449–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ranganathan, S.; Dutta, S.; Moses, J.A.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Utilization of Food Waste Streams for the Production of Biopolymers. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Visco, A.; Scolaro, C.; Facchin, M.; Brahimi, S.; Belhamdi, H.; Gatto, V.; Beghetto, V. Agri-food wastes for bioplastics: European prospective on possible applications in their second life for a circular economy. Polymers 2022, 14, 2752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Mak, T.M.W.; Xiong, X.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Yu, I.K.M.; Poon, C.S. Sustainable food waste management towards circular bioeconomy: Policy review, limitations and opportunities. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 297, 122497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Dziuba, R.; Kucharska, M.; Madej-Kiełbik, L.; Sulak, K.; Wisniewska-Wrona, M. Biopolymers and Biomaterials for Special Applications within the Context of the Circular Economy. Materials 2021, 14, 7704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Biopolymers used in the production of packaging films.
Table 1. Biopolymers used in the production of packaging films.
BiopolymerSource of BiopolymerAdditiveKey FindingReference
CarrageenanCommercial carrageenanLapacho tea extractImprovement of tensile strength, moisture content, and antioxidant activity with the addition of the extract[28]
Commercial carrageenanRice starchBest mechanical properties in a starch–carrageenan ratio of 1:1
Solubility and elongation depend on the ratio of starch to carrageenan
[29]
Dried seaweedStarchGood barrier properties and solubility, improvement of mechanical and barrier properties with the addition of starch[30]
Commercial carrageenanCoffee groundHigh moisture content and tensile strength, improvement of elasticity and reduction of moisture content with the addition of coffee grounds[31]
StarchSweet potatoGelatinLow moisture content, swelling degree and water vapour permeability; improvement of moisture content, water vapour permeability and low opacity with the addition of gelatin[25]
MilletClove oilGood mechanical and barrier properties; the addition of clove oil reduces solubility, tensile strength, and elongation, while increasing water vapour permeability and improving antioxidative and antimicrobial activity[24]
CassavaInulin and Lactobacillus caseiHigh moisture content, increased inulin content, improved mechanical and barrier properties and water solubility[22]
SagoBlack seed oilIncrease in film thickness, solubility and moisture content and decreased barrier properties with the addition black seed oil[32]
ChitosanShellsAcorn starch, eugenolImprovement in mechanical and barrier properties with the addition of starch and eugenol; good effect of eugenol on the antimicrobial and antioxidative activity of films[33]
ShrimpsCurcumin extractImprovement of mechanical and barrier properties and antioxidative and antimicrobial activity with the addition of curcumin extract[34]
Commercial chitosanOak extractImproved antioxidative properties of films with the addition of oak extract[35]
Commercial chitosanLime essential oilThe addition of lime essential oil improved the barrier and antimicrobial properties of films[36]
CelluloseCommercial celluloseVitamin E nanoencapsulatedImproved barrier properties and reduced mechanical properties with the addition of nanoencapsulated vitamin E[37]
Carboxymethyl CelluloseInulin, cellulose nanofibrils, Lactobacillus plantarumThe addition of cellulose nanofibrils and inulin led to deterioration in barrier properties[38]
PectinApplePomegranate juice, citric acidDeterioration of barrier properties with the addition of pomegranate juice[18]
Pectin fraction from pineapple peelPectin from pineapple peelImproved antioxidative activity and mechanical properties with the addition of pineapple peel extract[38]
CitrusClove oilIncreased film thickness, improved barrier and mechanical properties, and reduced moisture content and solubility with the addition of clove oil[39]
GelatinCommercial gelatinGinkgo biloba extractThe addition of Ginkgo biloba extract improved barrier properties and the antimicrobial activity of films[40]
Chicken skinRice flourHigh solubility, good barrier properties, but poor mechanical properties of films; the addition of rice flour improved the mechanical properties of films[41]
CollagenFish skinSodium alginate, glutaraldehydeIncorporation of sodium alginate led to improvement in barrier properties[42]
Whey proteinWheyCaseinImprovement in tensile strength and a reduction in elongation and barrier properties of films[43]
Table 2. Biopolymers isolated from food industry waste used in the production of packaging films.
Table 2. Biopolymers isolated from food industry waste used in the production of packaging films.
BiopolymerWasteYieldPretreatmentBiopolymer Isolation TechniqueAdditiveKey FindingReference
Chitosancrab waste10.1%physical and chemical pretreatmentsequential extraction/good antimicrobial activity and mechanical properties[69]
shrimp shell wasten.d.physical and chemical pretreatmentsequential extractionpolyvinyl alcohol (PVA), gelatin, chitosan, zinc oxide nanoparticleshigh thermal stability and biodegradability[88]
zinc oxide nanoparticles enhanced antimicrobial activity
polyvinyl alcohol and gelatin improved the mechanical properties
blue crab waste13.7%physical and chemical pretreatmentsequential extractionpectinan increase in chitosan content led to a reduction in moisture content, solubility and swelling degree[89]
Pectinorange peel5.1%physical and chemical pretreatmentacid extractionchitosangood mechanical properties[89]
lemon peeln.dchemical pretreatmentmicrowave extractionstarch, nano-titania inclusionsimproved barrier properties of films with the addition of nano-titania inclusions[90]
residual coffee water and coffee pulp from Coffea arabica16.1%physical pretreatmentthermal extractionchitosan, acetic acidchelant-soluble pectin positively influenced the mechanical and barrier properties[91]
Coffea arabica pectin led to an increase in the hydrophobicity of the films
residual coffee water and pectin exhibited the least favorable properties
peel of Passiflora tripartita var. mollissima23.02%physical pretreatmentacid extraction/good mechanical stability and low water vapor permeability[92]
Arabica coffee mucilage and pulpn.d.physical pretreatmentacid extractionspent coffee ground extract, bacterial celluloseimproved mechanical performance, better biodegradability, and moderate solubility with the addition of cellulose and spent coffee ground extract[93]
pomelo peeln.d.physical pretreatmentacid extractioncasein and egg albuminhigh tensile strength, low elongation to break, good barrier properties and solubility[94]
low tensile strength and high elongation to break with the addition of casein and egg albumin
Starchpotato peel11.52%/water extractioncarboxymethyl cellulosean increase in starch content led to a reduction in moisture content and solubility, and improved barrier, but not mechanical properties of films[95]
cassava peeln.d.physical pretreatmentsequential extractionchitosangood mechanical and thermal properties[96]
potato chips by-products33.4%physical pretreatmentphysical extractionoils and waxesgreat elasticity and flexibility compared to films made from commercial starch; positive effect on the mechanical properties with the addition oils[97]
potato waste20.5%physical and chemical pretreatmentsequential extraction/good flexibility and biodegradability[98]
Cellulose nanocrystalsorange peel27%physical pretreatmentsequential extractionchitosan, laurylamine oxidesponge-like structure of films[99]
pea peel waste42.5%physical and chemical pretreatmentsequential extraction with ultrasoundcarboxymethyl celluloseincreased water vapour permeability with the addition of carboxymethyl cellulose[100]
spent mushroom substraten.d.physical and chemical pretreatmentsequential extractioncarboxymethyl cellulose, ZnO nanoparticles, mushroom powder, pretreated celluloseZnO nanoparticles decrease transparency[101]
combination with mushroom powder, pretreated cellulose, and carboxymethyl cellulose improves the mechanical properties
mushroom powder and zinc oxide nanoparticles enhance antioxidant and antimicrobial activities
mango wasten.d./sequential extraction with ultrasoundchitosan nanoparticlegood mechanical and barrier properties of films[102]
Collagenskinn.d.chemical pretreatmentenzymatic extractionchitosanlow solubility and good barrier properties[103]
Bligon skinn.d.chemical and physical pretreatmentacid and thermal extraction/low tensile strength, elongation to break and solubility, good barrier properties[104]
fish skeletonn.d.chemical pretreatmentacid and enzymatic extractionchitosanchitosan improved mechanical properties[45]
fish skin25–45%physical pretreatmentsequential extractionchitosan, orange peel extractsmooth and transparent films without antimicrobial activity; the addition of orange peel extract reduced solubility of films [105]
Gelatinfish skin7.3%physical pretreatmentacid extractionpalm oil, gum Arabic, clove and oregano essential oilsthe addition of oils increased mechanical, antimicrobial and antioxidant activity[106]
chicken skinn.d.physical and chemical pretreatmentsequential extractionstarchgood mechanical properties and poor barrier properties; the addition of 10% starch films showed the best mechanical properties[107]
chicken skin and bovine bonesn.d.physical and acid–alkaline pretreatmenthydrothermal extractioncarboxymethyl cellulosegood mechanical properties of bovine gelatin-based films[108]
poor mechanical properties of chicken skin gelatin-based films
the addition of carboxymethyl cellulose deteriorated the barrier properties of films
chicken claw wasten.d.physical and chemical pretreatmentmicrowave extractioncarboxymethyl cellulosegood mechanical and poor barrier and physical properties with the addition of CMC [109]
chicken skinn.d.physical and chemical pretreatmentthermal extractioncoconut oilthe addition of coconut oil improved barrier and mechanical properties of films[110]
n.d.—not defined.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cvetković, K.; Karabegović, I.; Dordevic, S.; Dordevic, D.; Danilović, B. Valorization of Food Industry Waste for Biodegradable Biopolymer-Based Packaging Films. Processes 2025, 13, 2567. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13082567

AMA Style

Cvetković K, Karabegović I, Dordevic S, Dordevic D, Danilović B. Valorization of Food Industry Waste for Biodegradable Biopolymer-Based Packaging Films. Processes. 2025; 13(8):2567. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13082567

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cvetković, Kristina, Ivana Karabegović, Simona Dordevic, Dani Dordevic, and Bojana Danilović. 2025. "Valorization of Food Industry Waste for Biodegradable Biopolymer-Based Packaging Films" Processes 13, no. 8: 2567. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13082567

APA Style

Cvetković, K., Karabegović, I., Dordevic, S., Dordevic, D., & Danilović, B. (2025). Valorization of Food Industry Waste for Biodegradable Biopolymer-Based Packaging Films. Processes, 13(8), 2567. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13082567

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop