Next Article in Journal
Spray Drying of Jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.) Seeds Protein Concentrate: Physicochemical, Structural, and Thermal Characterization
Previous Article in Journal
Inferential Online Measurement of 3D Fractal Dimension of Spray Fluidized Bed Agglomerates
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characteristics of Deep Coal Reservoirs Based on Logging Parameter Responses and Laboratory Data: A Case Study of the Logging Response Analysis of Reservoir Parameters Is Carried Out in Ordos Basin, China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Numerical Simulation on Carbon Dioxide Geological Storage and Coalbed Methane Drainage Displacement—A Case Study in Middle Hunan Depression of China

1
Hunan Geophysical and Geochemical Survey Institute, Changsha 410014, China
2
Hunan Provincial Geological New Energy Exploration and Development Engineering Technology Research Center, Changsha 410014, China
3
Institute for Advanced Studies, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430070, China
4
Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
5
College of Geosciences and Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China
6
College of Earth Sciences & Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2025, 13(7), 2318; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13072318
Submission received: 26 April 2025 / Revised: 16 July 2025 / Accepted: 18 July 2025 / Published: 21 July 2025

Abstract

Based on a detailed investigation of the geological setting of coalbed methane by previous work in the Xiangzhong Depression, Hunan Province, numerical simulation methods were used to simulate the geological storage of carbon dioxide and displacement gas production in this area. In this simulation, a 400 m × 400 m square well group was constructed for coalbed methane production, and a carbon dioxide injection well was arranged in the center of the well group. Injection storage and displacement gas production simulations were carried out under the conditions of original permeability and 1 mD permeability. At the initial permeability (0.01 mD), carbon dioxide is difficult to inject, and the production of displaced and non-displaced coalbed methane is low. During the 25-year injection process, the reservoir pressure only increased by 7 MPa, and it is difficult to reach the formation fracture pressure. When the permeability reaches 1 mD, the carbon dioxide injection displacement rate can reach 4000 m3/d; the cumulative production of displaced and non-displaced coalbed methane is 7.83 × 106 m3 and 9.56 × 105 m3, respectively, and the average daily production is 1430 m3/d and 175 m3/d. The displacement effect is significantly improved compared to the original permeability. In the later storage stage, the carbon dioxide injection rate can reach 8000 m3/d, reaching the formation rupture pressure after 3 years, and the cumulative carbon dioxide injection volume is 1.17 × 107 m3. This research indicates that permeability has a great impact on carbon dioxide geological storage. During the carbon dioxide injection process, selecting areas with high permeability and choosing appropriate reservoir transformation measures to enhance permeability are key factors in increasing the amount of carbon dioxide injected into the area.

1. Introduction

In recent years, the total energy consumption of the Hunan Province economy has increased [1]. From 2008 to 2015, the total energy consumption of Hunan increased from 123 million tons of standard coal to 155 million tons of standard coal. In 2021, it exceeded 167 million tons of standard coal. From the perspective of consumption structure, Hunan Province is dominated by coal-polluting energy. Coal consumption accounted for 60% of the total in 2015 and 70% in 2021, and it is still the main energy source today [2]. The energy consumption structure is unbalanced, and the proportion of clean energy is lower [3,4]. In recent years, rapid economic development and an imbalance of energy consumption structure have led to an increase in carbon emissions in Hunan Province, and the realization of carbon neutrality is facing serious challenges. The Hunan Energy Development Report 2021 points out that the total carbon emissions from the energy sector in Hunan Province in 2019 are about 310 million tons, and it is predicted that the carbon emissions from the energy sector will peak in 2029–2030 at about 353 million tons. Although the total carbon emission, carbon intensity, and per capita carbon emission data are lower than the national average, the strategic deployment of “carbon peak and carbon neutrality” in Hunan Province is still imminent.
Although Hunan Province has clearly defined the short-term strategic direction of energy transformation under the “dual carbon” goal, the specific implementation path and action plan have not been decided, which is not conducive to the development of corresponding countermeasures and transformation plans in various industries. Hunan Province has large carbon dioxide emissions, and the problem of carbon source storage space can be solved by geological carbon sealing. There are coal seams, shales, sandstones, abandoned mines, goaf, and brackish water beds that can be used for carbon sequestration in the Lianshao Basin, which has good geological conditions and potential for carbon sequestration [5], but their specific characteristics and distribution areas are not clear and have not been studied. In addition, the coalbed methane production in Hunan Province is low, and the coalbed methane production rate can be improved by CO2 injection [6,7,8].
Geological sequestrations of CO2 into coal seams can be effective and successful [9,10,11,12,13]. Some numerical simulations of CO2 geological storage and coalbed methane drainage displacement have been conducted. Vishal et al. used the COMET3 software to simulate CO2-ECBM [14]. Chen et al. simulated the storage effect of injecting pure CO2 and a mixture of CO2 and saline water in the Junggar Basin of China [15]. Jia et al. simulated injection schemes and obtained a favorable threshold time for CO2 injection [16]. Fatah et al. simulated the effect of mineral content in reservoirs on storage potential [17,18]. Fan et al. simulated the sealing effect generated by different injection well heights, temperatures, and pressures [19]. Zou et al. performed CO2-ECBM in coal beds of the Longtan Formation in the Xiangzhong Depression of China [2].
Therefore, the authors of this paper collected geological features of coal and coalbed methane in the middle Hunan Depression of China from previous work, and performed numerical simulations of CO2 geological storage and coalbed methane drainage displacement in the research area. The authors’ conclusions within the paper will facilitate the development of an action plan for Hunan Province to reduce carbon dioxide emissions in the future.

2. Geological Setting

The study area is located in the middle of Hunan Province, and the central Xiangzhong Depression is distributed in the Zhadu, Lengshuijiang, DouShan, Hongshandian, Duanpoqiao, and Gujiaodi mining areas. The specific structure and distribution of the mining areas are shown in Figure 1. It should be noted that Figure 1 is modified from Ref. [5]. The northern part of the Depression is the Lianyuan sag, also known as the Lianyuan coal-bearing area. The Lianyuan fold belt is the northern wing of the Qiyang arc structure, with the Caledonian fold unconformity as the base. There are a series of wide and gentle short-axial synclines distributed from west to east [5,20]. The northern part of the Lianyuan Depression is the Weishan uplift and Xiangtan Depression. The central area is the Shaoyang Depression, with a series of tight to widespread synclines distributed from west to east. The southern area is the Lingling Depression, which has a complex structure consisting of a series of tightly closed folds that are inverted to the northwest and reverse faults that are thrust to the northeast. It often forms an imbricate structure and is also accompanied by transverse faults.
The Longtan Formation (P3l) of the Upper Permian is an important coal-bearing formation in this area. Bounded by 27°40′ north latitude, the Longtan Formation can be divided into two subtypes, north and south, according to the differences in the development of coal-bearing strata and contact with the upper and lower strata. The sedimentation in north Longtan is thin, with fewer coal layers, and is a tidal flat-related coal-bearing sedimentation set consisting of clastic rocks. It is an important coal-bearing formation in the area, composed of sandstone, siltstone, sandy claystone, carbonaceous shale, coal beds, etc. The thickness of the economically exploitable coal seam ranges from 0.7 to 3.2 m. The Longtan Formation has a large thickness, and the variation of lithology and lithofacies is divided into upper and lower sections. The lower part of the Longtan Formation (P3l1) does not contain coal. The upper part of the Longtan Formation (P3l2) is composed of feldspar, quartz, sandstone, siltstone, carbonaceous mudstone, sandy mudstone, and coal seam, which contains 5–10 layers of coal and can be mined from two layers with a total thickness of 0–12.50 m.

3. Geological Variation of Coalbed Methane

Laboratory experiments to obtain the geological variations of coalbed methane have been conducted in authors’ previous works described in Ref. [5], and the conclusions are as follows. The coal rocks of the Longtan Formation are mostly light black to black or steel gray, with a glass, strong glass, or semi-metallic to metallic luster, and a block, granular, banded, or scaly structure. The fissures are well developed, and the fracture is jagged or stepped, with visible shell-like shapes. The rock type in north Longtan is macroscopically classified as semi-bright to semi-dark coal, with less bright coal. The rock type in south Longtan is semi-bright to bright coal, with less semi-dark and dull coal. The results of the determination of the contents of the organic/inorganic microscopic components show that the vitrinite in this area ranges from 54.37 to 87.80%, the inertinite ranges from 11.14 to 25.89%, the exinite ranges from 0.35 to 14.08% (generally less than 1%), and the inorganic component ranges from 0.71 to 5.66% (clay minerals).
Under the microscope, the residual cellular pores and stomata in the coal body and the endogenous cracks were observed. The primary structure of the coal body is complete, as shown in Figure 2. The porosity test results show that the porosity in the region ranges from 6.59 to 15.94%, and the distribution, which ranges from 7 to 9%, is concentrated. The vertical permeability of the coal core is affected by a large buried depth, coal crushing, and high ground stress, resulting in a low permeability of 0.001–0.025 mD. The horizontal permeability was higher than the vertical permeability and ranged from 0.013 to 0.082 mD, which is lower than 0.05 mD.
The reservoir pressure in this area ranges from 3.74 to 11.58 MPa, and the reservoir pressure is high overall, indicating that the energy of the coal seam is high, which is conducive to the adsorption and desorption of coalbed gas. In addition, excessive reservoir pressure is caused by high ground stress, high gas pressure, and high water pressure, resulting in concomitant structural coal and low permeability. From the perspective of permeability and reservoir reformability, it is not conducive to the drainage of coalbed methane. The Langmuir volume varies from 12.43 to 33.27 m3/t, and the main value is greater than 25 m3/t. The Langmuir pressure ranges from 1.05 to 3.63 MPa, and the main value is greater than 2 MPa. Therefore, the high overall Langmuir volume indicates that the Longtan Formation coal seam has a strong adsorption capacity and development potential of coalbed methane.
The main component of coalbed methane in this area is methane, the content of which ranges from 53.7 to 97.68%. More than 80% of the mine area’s methane content is more than 90%. The CO2 content ranges from 0.04 to 8.42%, with most being higher than 2%. The N2 content ranges from 1.5 to 38.4%, with an average of 12.5%. The heavy hydrocarbon content ranges from 0.067 to 8.11%, with an average of 2.6%. Based on desorption in situ, gas content data ranges from 2.0 to 30.3 m3/t, with most of it ranging from 4 to 18 m3/t, as shown in Figure 3.

4. Numerical Simulation of Carbon Dioxide Storage and Displacement

During simulation, the following assumptions are made: 1. The initial gas consists of only methane. 2. The coal reservoir is assumed to be homogeneous. 3. The simulated gas production during the CO2-ECBM stage only includes methane, and there is no CO2 leakage after the CO2 geological sequestration stage.
Based on the above results, combined with Eclipse reservoir numerical simulation software (version 2006.1), a numerical simulation of carbon dioxide storage and displacement gas production in Longtan Formation coal seam was carried out. Based on the experience of single well radius values, the simulation design of a 400 × 400 m square well group coalbed methane mining was generated. A carbon dioxide injection well is placed in the center of the well group to simulate the carbon dioxide injection and storage performance of a single well in the well group, as illustrated in Figure 4. Two stages were designed for this simulation. The first stage is the carbon dioxide injection displacement gas production stage. The design duration is 15 years based on the discharge period of general coalbed methane wells. The long-term low-injection method was chosen for displacement because the original permeability of the coal seam is low and therefore not suitable for a short-term large-scale carbon dioxide injection. First of all, the first 5 years are the gas production stage of carbon dioxide injection displacement. Secondly, the injection well is closed, and only production is generated 10 years later. Finally, the drainage and production were stopped, and the gas-producing wells were closed. The second stage is the carbon dioxide storage stage. The process stops gas production from the square well group and injects CO2 into the target coal seam through injection wells until the formation rupture pressure is reached. Finally, the carbon dioxide storage capacity of a single well is calculated.
Due to the size limitation of the test samples, there is an error between the core permeability measured in the laboratory and the actual formation permeability. In addition, reservoir fracturing is generally required before coalbed methane wells are produced to enhance permeability. Therefore, the effects of carbon dioxide injection storage and displacement gas production under an initial permeability of 1 mD were respectively simulated. The reservoir parameter values set by the simulation generally adopt the average data of the whole region, and the parameters are derived from the data, as shown in Table 1.
In the authors’ previous work, sensitivity analyses for permeability and porosity were performed in detail, as illustrated in Ref. [2], and it was found that permeability is an important parameter in reservoir numerical simulations. In this paper, detailed investigations of permeability on geological sequestration and CO2-ECBM are performed and illustrated as follows.
Figure 5 and Figure 6 show the effects of carbon dioxide storage and displacement gas production at 0.01 mD and 1 mD permeability, respectively.
Figure 5 indicates that at an initial permeability of 0.01 mD, it is difficult to inject carbon dioxide for displacement. The injection rate is only 100 m3/d, and both the displaced and non-displaced coalbed methane production rates are low, with cumulative production volumes of 14.95 × 104 m3 and 1.81 × 104 m3, respectively. During the injection and sequestration phase, the maximum injection rate of carbon dioxide is only 200 m3/d. During the 25-year injection process, the reservoir pressure increases by only 7 MPa, making it difficult to achieve the formation fracture pressure. Therefore, further simulation is not continued.
Figure 6 shows that when the permeability reaches 1 mD, the CO2 injection displacement rate exceeds 4000 m3/d, and the injection rate is higher than that under the original permeability condition. During the 15-year production process, the cumulative coalbed methane production for displacement and non-displacement is 7.83 × 106 m3 and 9.56 × 105 m3, respectively, and the average daily production rates are 1430 m3/d and 175 m3/d, respectively. The displacement results in a significant increase in coalbed methane production. In the later storage stage, the initial carbon dioxide injection rate is set to 8000 m3/d. The formation fracture pressure achieved after 3 years was 58.7 MPa, and the cumulative carbon dioxide injection volume was 1.17 × 107 m3.
Figure 7 shows the molar fraction of carbon dioxide after 5 years of carbon dioxide displacement injection at permeabilities of 0.01 mD and 1 mD. At the original permeability of 0.01 mD, due to the difficulty of injecting carbon dioxide, its diffusion is not significant, with only a small amount of carbon dioxide distribution near the injection well. When the permeability increases to 1 mD, its molar distribution shows significant diffusion during the displacement process with the injection of 4000 m3/d of carbon dioxide and spreads throughout the entire well group area due to the favorable permeability.
As can be seen from the above simulations, various permeabilities result in significantly different CO2 sequestrations, and a higher permeability leads to superior CO2 injection rates and increases the amount of CO2 sequestration. Therefore, during the later stages of carbon dioxide injection, selecting areas with developed permeabilities and implementing reservoir enhancement measures to increase permeability is a crucial factor in increasing the amount of carbon dioxide injection.

5. Conclusions

On the basis of ascertaining the geological background of the study area and the geological characteristics of coalbed methane in detail, the numerical simulation of carbon dioxide geological storage and gas production by displacement was carried out. In this simulation, a square well group measuring 400 m × 400 m was constructed for coalbed methane production, with a carbon dioxide injection well placed at the center of the well group. A simulation of injection storage and displacement gas production under the conditions of original permeability and 1 mD permeability was carried out, and the following conclusions were obtained.
(1)
At the initial permeability of 0.01 mD, it was difficult to inject and displace carbon dioxide with an injection rate of only 100 m3/d. In addition, the production of both displaced and non-displaced coalbed methane was low, with cumulative gas production of 14.95 × 104 m3 and 1.81 × 104 m3, respectively. In the injection and storage stage, the maximum carbon dioxide injection rate was only 200 m3/d. During the 25 years of injection, the reservoir pressure only increased by 7 MPa, making it difficult to achieve the formation fracture pressure.
(2)
The penetration rate reached 1 mD, and the carbon dioxide injection displacement rate exceeded 4000 m3/d, which is a significant increase compared to the original permeability conditions. During the 15 years of drainage and production, the cumulative coalbed methane production of displaced and non-displaced coalbed methane was 7.83 × 106 m3 and 9.56 × 105 m3 respectively, with an average daily production of 1430 m3/d and 175 m3/d. In the later storage stage, the initial carbon dioxide injection rate was set at 8000 m3/d. The formation fracture pressure, which was 58.7 MPa, was reached after 3 years,. The cumulative carbon dioxide injection volume was 1.17 × 107 m3.
(3)
At the original permeability of 0.01 mD, due to the difficulty of injecting carbon dioxide, its diffusion was not significant, with only a small amount of carbon dioxide distributed near the injection well. When the permeability increased to 1 mD, its molar distribution showed significant diffusion during the displacement process with an injection of 4000 m3/d of carbon dioxide and spread throughout the entire well group area due to the favorable permeability.
(4)
The amount of carbon dioxide that was trapped was controlled by the reservoir permeability. During the carbon dioxide injection process, selecting areas with high permeability and choosing appropriate reservoir transformation measures to enhance permeability are key factors in increasing the amount of carbon dioxide injected into the area.
The conclusions in this paper will facilitate the development of an action plan for Hunan Province to reduce carbon dioxide emissions in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.H.; Methodology, K.W.; Validation, F.L. and M.Z.; Investigation, J.C., N.C., Z.L., J.D. and S.G.; Data curation, N.C., Z.L., J.D. and S.G.; Writing—review & editing, J.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by 2023 Research Project of Hunan Provincial Institute of Geology (No. HNGSTP202310) and National Science and Technology Major Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (No. 2024ZD1001000). And the APC was funded by 2023 Research Project of Hunan Provincial Institute of Geology (No. HNGSTP202310).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yang, C. Green Development of Hunan Province Based on Ecological Deficit; Xiamen University Press: Xiamen, China, 2020. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. Zou, M.; Ding, Z.; Cheng, Y.; Yao, L.; Sun, Y.; Wang, K. Numerical simulation of CO2 geological sequestration and CO2-ECBM in coal beds of Longtan Formation, Xiangzhong Depression, Hunan Province, China. Greenh. Gas Sci. Technol. 2024, 14, 743–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dale, A.W.; Sommer, S.; Lichtschlag, A.; Koopmans, D.; Haeckel, M.; Kossel, E.; Deusner, C.; Linke, P.; Scholten, J.; Wallmann, K.; et al. Defining a biogeochemical baseline for sediments at Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) sites: An example from the North Sea (Goldeneye). Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 2021, 106, 103265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhong, Z.; Chen, Y.; Fu, M.; Li, M.; Yang, K.; Zeng, L.; Liang, J.; Ma, R.; Xie, Q. Role of CO2 geological storage in China’s pledge to carbon peak by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2060. Energy 2023, 272, 127165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cai, N.; Wang, K.; Du, J. Geological occurrence and productivity prediction for coalbed methane of central Hunan depression, China. Front. Earth Sci. 2022, 10, 1018465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huang, L.; Ning, Z.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, W.; Cheng, Z.; Wu, X.; Qin, H. Effect of organic type and moisture on CO2/CH4 competitive adsorption in kerogen with implications for CO2 sequestration and enhanced CH4 recovery. Appl. Energy 2018, 210, 28–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Qin, L.; Zhai, C.; Liu, S.; Xu, J.; Wu, S.; Dong, R. Fractal dimensions of low rank coal subjected to liquid nitrogen freeze-thaw based on nuclear magnetic resonance applied for coalbed methane recovery. Powder Technol. 2018, 325, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Z.; Meng, S.; Zhang, S.; Jia, J. CO2-injection parameters in horizontal well of deep coalbed in North Shizhuang block of Qinshui basin. Coal Geol. Explor. 2018, 46, 188–192, (In Chinese with an English abstract). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, L.; Zhao, N.; Wei, W.; Sun, Y. A review of research progress on CO2 capture, storage, and utilization in Chinese Academy of Sciences. Fuel 2013, 108, 112–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ross, H.E.; Hagin, P.; Zoback, M.D. CO2 storage and enhanced coalbed methane recovery: Reservoir characterization and fluid flow simulations of the Big George coal, Powder River Basin, Wyoming, USA. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 2009, 3, 773–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Faiz, M.; Saghafi, A.; Barclay, S.; Stalker, L.; Sherwood, N.; Whitford, D. Evaluating geological sequestration of CO2 in bituminous coals: The southern Sydney Basin, Australia as a natural analogue. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 2007, 1, 223–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Davoodi, S.; Thanh, H.V.; Wood, D.A.; Mehrad, M.; Rukavishnikov, V.S.; Dai, Z. Machine-learning predictions of solubility and residual trapping indexes of carbon dioxide from global geological storage sites. Expert Syst. Appl. 2023, 222, 119796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shaw, R.; Mukherjee, S. The development of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in India: A critical review. Carbon Capture Sci. Technol. 2022, 2, 100036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Vishal, V.; Singh, L.; Pradhan, S.P.; Singh, T.N.; Ranjith, P.G. Numerical Modeling of Gondwana Coal Seams in India as Coalbed Methane Reservoirs Substituted for Carbon Dioxide Sequestration. Energy 2013, 49, 384–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, L.; Liu, D.; Agarwal, R. Numerical Simulation of Enhancement in CO2 Sequestration with Various Water Production Schemes Under Multiple Well Scenarios. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 184, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jia, B.; Tsau, J.; Barati, R. Role of Molecular Diffusion in Heterogeneous, Naturally Fractured Shale Reservoirs During CO2 Huff-n-Puff. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2018, 164, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fatah, A.; Ben Mahmud, H.; Bennour, Z.; Hossain, M.; Gholami, R. Effect of Supercritical CO2 Treatment on Physical Properties and Functional Groups of Shales. Fuel 2021, 303, 121310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fatah, A.; Bennour, Z.; Mahmud, H.K.B.; Gholami, R.; Hossain, M. Surface Wettability Alteration of Shales Exposed to CO2, Implication for Long-Term Integrity of Geological Storage Sites. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2021, 110, 103426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fan, L.; Tan, Q.; Li, H.; Xu, J.; Wang, X.; Liu, S. Simulation on Effects of Injection Parameters on CO2 Enhanced Gas Recovery in a Heterogeneous Natural Gas Reservoir. Adv. Theory Simul. 2021, 4, 21001278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bai, Y.; Yu, Q.; Miao, F.; Zeng, X.; Zeng, P.; Lu, P. Exploration Prospects Analysis of Shale Gas of Middle Permian Xiaojiangbian Formation in the Lianyuan Depression, Central Hunan Province. Geol. Miner. Resour. South China 2016, 32, 159–165, (In Chinese with an English abstract). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Xiangzhong Depression structural outline map and mining area distribution map (modified from Ref. [5]).
Figure 1. Xiangzhong Depression structural outline map and mining area distribution map (modified from Ref. [5]).
Processes 13 02318 g001
Figure 2. Microscopic characteristics of Longtan Formation coal in the study area. (a) Residual cell pores. (b) Endogenous cracks and native structures.
Figure 2. Microscopic characteristics of Longtan Formation coal in the study area. (a) Residual cell pores. (b) Endogenous cracks and native structures.
Processes 13 02318 g002
Figure 3. Gas content data distribution map of the study area (modified from Ref. [5]).
Figure 3. Gas content data distribution map of the study area (modified from Ref. [5]).
Processes 13 02318 g003
Figure 4. Well arrangement during simulation.
Figure 4. Well arrangement during simulation.
Processes 13 02318 g004
Figure 5. Single well gas injection displacement and carbon dioxide storage simulation (0.01 mD).
Figure 5. Single well gas injection displacement and carbon dioxide storage simulation (0.01 mD).
Processes 13 02318 g005
Figure 6. Single well gas injection displacement and carbon dioxide storage simulation (1 mD).
Figure 6. Single well gas injection displacement and carbon dioxide storage simulation (1 mD).
Processes 13 02318 g006
Figure 7. Carbon dioxide mole fraction diagram after 5 years of injection (left: 0.01 mD; right: 1 mD).
Figure 7. Carbon dioxide mole fraction diagram after 5 years of injection (left: 0.01 mD; right: 1 mD).
Processes 13 02318 g007
Table 1. Numerical simulation parameter values.
Table 1. Numerical simulation parameter values.
Reservoir ParametersValueSourceReservoir ParametersValueSource
Gas content, m3/t11Data averageCH4 Langmuir volume, m3/t23Data average
Coal thickness, m2Data averageCH4 Langmuir pressure, MPa2.3Data average
Porosity, %8Data averageReservoir pressure, MPa7.6Data average
Permeability, mD0.01; 1Average value + settingFormation fracture pressure, MPa60.35Material
CO2 Langmuir volume, m3/t31MaterialRock compressibility, 1/KPa10−9Material
CO2 Langmuir pressure, MPa0.4MaterialFormation water compressibility4.35 × 10−7Material
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, L.; Wang, K.; Liao, F.; Cui, J.; Zou, M.; Cai, N.; Liu, Z.; Du, J.; Gong, S.; Bai, J. Numerical Simulation on Carbon Dioxide Geological Storage and Coalbed Methane Drainage Displacement—A Case Study in Middle Hunan Depression of China. Processes 2025, 13, 2318. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13072318

AMA Style

He L, Wang K, Liao F, Cui J, Zou M, Cai N, Liu Z, Du J, Gong S, Bai J. Numerical Simulation on Carbon Dioxide Geological Storage and Coalbed Methane Drainage Displacement—A Case Study in Middle Hunan Depression of China. Processes. 2025; 13(7):2318. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13072318

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Lihong, Keying Wang, Fengchu Liao, Jianjun Cui, Mingjun Zou, Ningbo Cai, Zhiwei Liu, Jiang Du, Shuhua Gong, and Jianglun Bai. 2025. "Numerical Simulation on Carbon Dioxide Geological Storage and Coalbed Methane Drainage Displacement—A Case Study in Middle Hunan Depression of China" Processes 13, no. 7: 2318. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13072318

APA Style

He, L., Wang, K., Liao, F., Cui, J., Zou, M., Cai, N., Liu, Z., Du, J., Gong, S., & Bai, J. (2025). Numerical Simulation on Carbon Dioxide Geological Storage and Coalbed Methane Drainage Displacement—A Case Study in Middle Hunan Depression of China. Processes, 13(7), 2318. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13072318

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop