Next Article in Journal
A Novel Approach for Voltage Stability Assessment and Optimal Siting and Sizing of DGs in Radial Power Distribution Networks
Previous Article in Journal
Hybrid Cloud-Based Information and Control System Using LSTM-DNN Neural Networks for Optimization of Metallurgical Production
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nano Zero-Valent Iron (nZVI) Encapsulated with ABS (nZVI/(ABS + EC)) for Sustainable Denitrification Performance and Anti-Aggregation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Remediation Strategies for Soil and Water

by
Junxia Wang
and
Xiaoqiang Cui
*
Tianjin Key Lab of Biomass Waste Utilization, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2025, 13(7), 2238; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13072238
Submission received: 26 June 2025 / Accepted: 11 July 2025 / Published: 14 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remediation Strategies for Soil and Water)
With the rapid development of industry worldwide, soil and water pollution has increased in recent decades [1,2]. Pollutants such as heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, antibiotics, and microplastics in soil and water cause severe environmental problems [3,4,5,6], posing serious risks to human health and the ecological system. Approximately 4 billion people, representing about half of the world’s population, suffer from severe physical water scarcity for at least part of the year [7]. Hence, several techniques have been developed for the remediation of contaminated soil and water, including adsorption, membrane separation, advanced oxidation, ion exchange, electrochemical treatment, microbial degradation, and phytoremediation [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Considering the ongoing issue of pollution and emerging pollutants, remediation strategies for soil and water should be further optimized to focus on developing functional materials, improving remediation efficiency, and enhancing integrated remediation processes. This Special Issue entitled “Remediation Strategies for Soil and Water” features six research articles and three review papers, each addressing critical aspects of remediation processes for soil and water. The contributions are briefly described below.
Liu et al. [16] demonstrated the application of the volume-of-fluid (VOF) technique in the prediction of leakage and diffusion of underwater oil spill, providing potential remediation strategies. They determined the impacts of various parameters on leakage and diffusion characteristics by adjusting ocean current velocity, spilled oil velocity, and the density and viscosity of crude oil. Notably, a user-defined function was proposed and used for computational fluid dynamics modeling, and they obtained a critical formula to determine the lateral migration distance of spilled oil under various conditions. Their results can provide a theoretical basis for developing an emergency treatment scheme for offshore oil spills and improve the remediation efficiency of oil-contaminated water.
Yang et al. [17] focused on the effective removal of ammonium from water using ball-milled biochar modified with NaOH. They aimed to explore the feasibility of using modified biochars to achieve the enhanced remediation of ammonium-polluted water. The results indicate that the ball-milling treatment and NaOH modification greatly improved the ammonium sorption capacity of biochar, and the modified biochars showed enhanced sorption performance in a wide pH range (3–7). The surface complexation with functional groups and cation exchange were considered the main sorption mechanisms. The authors concluded that biochar modified via NaOH/ball-milling can be employed as a cost-effective sorbent for the remediation of ammonium-polluted water.
Meng et al. [18] proposed a promising scheme for the sustainable remediation of nitrate-contaminated groundwater through permeable reactive barrier (PRB) remediation systems. They fabricated nano zero-valent iron (nZVI) particles encapsulated within an acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) matrix, which efficiently solved the problem of aggregation and reactivity decrease through regulating the distribution of nZVI particles and controlling the interaction between nZVI particles and the polluted water. The results demonstrate that encapsulation suppressed the aggregation of nZVI, achieving sustainable denitrification performance during wastewater remediation.
Luo et al.’s research [19] delves into the impacts of fertilization on nitrogen and phosphorus pollution in agricultural water bodies. They built a crop–soil runoff water system to determine the variation in crop growth and the pollutant contents in water bodies under different fertilization rates. The authors emphasized that crop growth intercepted the migration of nitrogen and phosphorus, which was further affected by different growth stages. Considering the combined effects of fertilization on soil fertility, crop yield, and environmental risk, they proposed an optimized fertilization rate for an eggplant planting system, achieving the best interception effect on nitrogen and phosphorus in the water system.
Wang et al. [20] provide an overview of a hot topic, reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from farmland soil, especially focusing on the microbial-mediated process. They systematically illuminated the main generation pathways of GHGs (i.e., CO2, CH4, and N2O) in soil and analyzed the impacts of various environmental factors, including soil temperature, organic matter, moisture, and pH, on soil GHG emissions. Additionally, they determined the microbial mechanisms involved in the soil GHG emission process under various soil remediation modes (e.g., the biochar addition, organic fertilizer addition, straw return, and microalgal biofertilizer application modes). They demonstrated the critical role of microalgae biofertilizer in reducing GHG emissions in farmland soil, providing a theoretical basis for achieving carbon neutrality in agriculture production.
Wang et al. [21] systematically reviewed hydrothermal treatment for food waste to address its potential environmental risk. The authors presented an in-depth analysis of the effects of the mechanisms of hydrothermal conditions (e.g., hydrothermal temperature, time, feedstock properties, and catalysts) on the generation of various products, focusing on the potential application of the value-added products derived from the hydrothermal treatment of food waste. Hydrochar, bio-oil, and gaseous products derived from this process showed good potential in environmental remediation, soil improvement, energy production, and new material synthesis. Finally, the authors proposed the potential challenges and development directions for the hydrothermal treatment of food waste.
Liu et al. [22] conducted a study on landfill gas–water joint regulation technology. Low oxygen utilization rates resulted in high energy consumption and operating costs, further restraining the application of in situ aeration technology to stabilize municipal solid waste. The authors aimed to improve oxygen utilization efficiency through observing the dynamic respiratory index and the removal of pollutants. Hence, they constructed three continuous reactors and proposed targeted aeration and re-circulation schemes for various landfill ages. The results imply that a well-designed reactor (aerobic, semi-aerobic, and anaerobic systems) can effectively degrade the organic components of municipal solid waste with various landfill ages, and gas–water joint technology is beneficial to activating microorganisms.
Cao et al. [23] provide a comprehensive overview of oxygenated and nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil, including the sources, quantification, incidence, toxicity, and transport of these PAHs in soil. Considering the high toxicity and distinct environmental effects of oxygenated and nitrated PAHs, their behaviors were systematically summarized. The authors discussed the toxicity, human health risk, and transformation of oxygenated and nitrated PAHs in soil, providing a valuable basis for the efficient remediation of PAH-contaminated soil.
The study by Ortiz-Soto et al. [24] focused on the electrokinetic remediation of heavy-metal-contaminated mining area soil. The electrokinetic remediation (EKR) technique was employed to assess the migration of heavy metal contaminant from fresh mine tailings. Hence, a pilot EKR cell was designed to study the recovery potential of cobalt, nickel, and copper species, and the impacts of electric field intensity, pH, and their interaction on heavy metal recovery performance were determined. The authors found the optimized electric field and pretreatment solution concentration for the enhanced migration of typical heavy metals, promoting the recovery of various species and the remediation of mining area soil.
This Special Issue aims to elucidate the recent advancements and emerging challenges in the remediation of soil and water. We hope that these valuable contributions from outstanding scientists will inspire readers to gain new ideas for future research and promote the development of environmental remediation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, and writing—original draft preparation, J.W.; conceptualization, writing—review and editing, and supervision, X.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Lu, Y.; Song, S.; Wang, R.; Liu, Z.; Meng, J.; Sweetman, A.J.; Jenkins, A.; Ferrier, R.C.; Li, H.; Luo, W.; et al. Impacts of soil and water pollution on food safety and health risks in China. Environ. Int. 2015, 77, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Schwarzenbach, R.P.; Egli, T.; Hofstetter, T.B.; von Gunten, U.; Wehrli, B. Global Water Pollution and Human Health. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2010, 35, 109–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hou, D.Y.; O’Connor, D.; Igalavithana, A.D.; Alessi, D.S.; Luo, J.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Sparks, D.L.; Yamauchi, Y.; Rinklebe, J.; Ok, Y.S. Metal contamination and bioremediation of agricultural soils for food safety and sustainability. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2020, 1, 366–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Al-sareji, O.J.; Grmasha, R.A.; Jakab, M.; Khan, M.S.; Islam, S.; Biswas, T.; Meiczinger, M.; Stenger-Kovacs, C. PAHs in the sediments of the Shatt Al-Hillah River, Babylon, Iraq: Spatial and temporal distribution, pollution sources, human impacts, and treatment strategy. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2025, 200, 107371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sarmah, A.K.; Meyer, M.T.; Boxall, A.B.A. A global perspective on the use, sales, exposure pathways, occurrence, fate and effects of veterinary antibiotics (VAs) in the environment. Chemosphere 2006, 65, 725–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Horton, A.A.; Walton, A.; Spurgeon, D.J.; Lahive, E.; Svendsen, C. Microplastics in freshwater and terrestrial environments: Evaluating the current understanding to identify the knowledge gaps and future research priorities. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 586, 127–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. UN-Water. UN World Water Development Report 2025. Available online: https://www.unwater.org/publications/un-world-water-development-report-2025 (accessed on 21 March 2025).
  8. Cui, X.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Khan, M.B.; Lu, M.; Khan, K.Y.; Song, Y.; He, Z.; Yang, X.; Yan, B.; et al. Biochar from constructed wetland biomass waste: A review of its potential and challenges. Chemosphere 2022, 287, 132259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ighalo, J.O.; Chen, Z.; Ohoro, C.R.; Oniye, M.; Igwegbe, C.A.; Elimhingbovo, I.; Khongthaw, B.; Dulta, K.; Yap, P.-S.; Anastopoulos, I. A review of remediation technologies for uranium-contaminated water. Chemosphere 2024, 352, 141322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wei, K.H.; Ma, J.; Xi, B.D.; Yu, M.D.; Cui, J.; Chen, B.L.; Li, Y.; Gu, Q.B.; He, X.S. Recent progress on in-situ chemical oxidation for the remediation of petroleum contaminated soil and groundwater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 432, 128738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Esfahani, E.B.; Dixit, F.; Zeidabadi, F.A.; Johnson, M.R.; Mayilswamy, N.; Kandasubramanian, B.; Mohseni, M. Ion exchange and advanced oxidation/reduction processes for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances treatment: A mini-review. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2023, 42, 100953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yang, X.; Liu, L.H.; Tan, W.F.; Liu, C.S.; Dang, Z.; Qiu, G.H. Remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils by organic acid extraction and electrochemical adsorption. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 264, 114745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, Y.C.; Li, A.; Cui, C.W. Remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils by electrokinetic technology: Mechanisms and applicability. Chemosphere 2021, 265, 129071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bose, S.; Kumar, P.S.; Vo, D.V.N.; Rajamohan, N.; Saravanan, R. Microbial degradation of recalcitrant pesticides: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 3209–3228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, J.; Cao, X.; Yao, Z.; Lin, Q.; Yan, B.; Cui, X.; He, Z.; Yang, X.; Wang, C.-H.; Chen, G. Phytoremediation of Cd-contaminated farmland soil via various Sedum alfredii-oilseed rape cropping systems: Efficiency comparison and cost-benefit analysis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 419, 126489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Liu, R.; Ding, S.; Ju, G. Numerical Study of Leakage and Diffusion of Underwater Oil Spill by Using Volume-of-Fluid (VOF) Technique and Remediation Strategies for Clean-Up. Processes 2022, 10, 2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, H.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Yang, L.; Ma, Z.; Luo, J.; Cui, X.; Yan, B.; Chen, G. Effective Removal of Ammonium from Aqueous Solution by Ball-Milled Biochar Modified with NaOH. Processes 2023, 11, 1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Meng, F.; Yang, Y.; Li, M.; Zhu, Q.; Qin, B.; Yang, C. Nano Zero-Valent Iron (nZVI) Encapsulated with ABS (nZVI/(ABS + EC)) for Sustainable Denitrification Performance and Anti-Aggregation. Processes 2024, 12, 697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Luo, P.; Xin, C.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Ling, J.; Wang, T.; Huang, J.; Khu, S.-T. Effect of Rational Fertilizer for Eggplants on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Pollutants in Agricultural Water Bodies. Processes 2023, 11, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, H.; Zhao, R.; Zhao, D.; Liu, S.; Fu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Dai, N.; Song, D.; Ding, H. Microbial-Mediated Emissions of Greenhouse Gas from Farmland Soils: A Review. Processes 2022, 10, 2361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, C.; Wang, Z.; Wang, X.; Li, N.; Tao, J.; Zheng, W.; Yan, B.; Cui, X.; Cheng, Z.; Chen, G. A Review on the Hydrothermal Treatment of Food Waste: Processing and Applications. Processes 2022, 10, 2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, J.; Pan, T.; Zhao, H.; Guo, Y.; Chen, G.; Hou, L. Application of Landfill Gas-Water Joint Regulation Technology in Tianjin Landfill. Processes 2023, 11, 2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cao, W.; Yuan, J.; Geng, S.; Zou, J.; Dou, J.; Fan, F. Oxygenated and Nitrated Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Sources, Quantification, Incidence, Toxicity, and Fate in Soil-A Review Study. Processes 2023, 11, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ortiz-Soto, R.; Leal, D.; Gutierrez, C.; Aracena, A.; Leon, M.; Lazo, A.; Lazo, P.; Ottosen, L.; Hansen, H. Incidence of Electric Field and Sulfuric Acid Concentration in Electrokinetic Remediation of Cobalt, Copper, and Nickel in Fresh Copper Mine Tailings. Processes 2023, 11, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, J.; Cui, X. Remediation Strategies for Soil and Water. Processes 2025, 13, 2238. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13072238

AMA Style

Wang J, Cui X. Remediation Strategies for Soil and Water. Processes. 2025; 13(7):2238. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13072238

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Junxia, and Xiaoqiang Cui. 2025. "Remediation Strategies for Soil and Water" Processes 13, no. 7: 2238. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13072238

APA Style

Wang, J., & Cui, X. (2025). Remediation Strategies for Soil and Water. Processes, 13(7), 2238. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13072238

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop